TURMEL: Supreme Court candidate exclusion ruling coming up
Tom Kenney
<News.Release.@Supreme.Court> wrote:
> From: News.Release.@Supreme.Court <News.Release.@Supreme.Court>
> Subject: Judgments to be Rendered in Leave Applications
> Date: Monday, November 16, 2009, 9:12 AM
> OTTAWA, 2009-11-16. THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA ANNOUNCED
> TODAY THAT JUDGMENT IN THE FOLLOWING APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE
> TO APPEAL WILL BE DELIVERED AT 9:45 A.M. EST ON
> THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 2009. THIS LIST IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE.
> FROM: SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (613) 995-4330
> Note for subscribers:
> The summaries of the cases are available at http://www.scc-
csc.gc.ca
> Click on Cases and on SCC Case Information, type in the Case
Number and press Search. Click on the Case Number on the Search
Results screen, and when the docket screen appears, click on
"Summary" which will appear in the left column. Alternatively,
click on
> http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/news_release/2009/09-11-
16.2a/09-11-16.2a.html
>
> 3. John C. Turmel v. Canadian Radio-Television and
> Telecommunications Commission (F.C.) (Civil) (By Leave)
> (33319)
Jct: We find out if political debates no longer have to give
equitable time to all candidates because of the Ontario Court of
Appeal CBC decision that lets the media exclude any candidates
they wish because debates do not have partisan political effect.
Major issue with much at stake.
http://www.scc-csc.gc.ca/case-dossier/cms-sgd/dock-regi-eng.aspx?cas=33319
My page says: All materials on application for leave submitted to
the Judges, CJ Abe Ro
Must be Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin, bad news bear before
Rosie Silberman Abella, bad news bear before
Marshall Rothstein, bad news bear before
Google for John Turmel and Rothstein for an article on the Pierre
Drouin, Real Menard, John Turmel marijuana POLCOA appeals and
these are the three Supremes who let the court-resurrected law
stand:
JCT: Chief Justice McLachlin and Justice Charron and
Rothstein denied all five of our applications for leave to
appeal. Information on the steps can be found at:
http://cases-dossiers.scc-csc.gc.ca/...et_e.asp?32009
http://cases-dossiers.scc-csc.gc.ca/...et_e.asp?32010
http://cases-dossiers.scc-csc.gc.ca/...et_e.asp?32011
http://cases-dossiers.scc-csc.gc.ca/...et_e.asp?32012
http://cases-dossiers.scc-csc.gc.ca/...et_e.asp?32013
And Abella was on the Ontario Court of Appeal that let Judge
Wright expand the criminal code gaming house definition to get me
in violation of the restricted interpretation of criminal
statutes. Court-resurrected and court-created law okayed by this
Court-Trumped-Up-Charges-Okay panel.
So we have judges who allowed all sorts of legal skullduggery.
The best thing about going to the top is we get to recollect on
the dirty doings of the people we call Justice. Har har har har.
