Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon.
Switch to the new Google Groups.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
BOND #18
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  3 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Kurt Martin  
View profile  
 More options May 31 1996, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.fan.james-bond
From: Kurt Martin <ro...@worldlink.ca>
Date: 1996/05/31
Subject: BOND #18

http://www.islandnet.com/~corona/films/details/jb18.html

James Bond Film #18

Genre: Action/Adventure.

Studio: MGM/UA.
Production Company: Unknown.

Project Phase: Movies Rumored.

Who's In It: Pierce Brosnan (James Bond, Agent 007, who IS confirmed).
Who's Making It: Bruce Feirstein (Screenwriter); Albert R. "Cubby"
Broccoli (Executive
Producer).

Premise: See Scoop Feedback.

Release Date: Unknown.

Comments: None.

Rumors: Unknown.

Scoop Feedback:

March 19, 1996... Pierce Brosnan's Bond returns to confront former Bond
George Lazenby (007
from On Her Majesty's Secret Service), who controls an underwater base
equipped with nuclear
warheads appropriated from the fallen Soviet empire. (Hey, if this isn't
the plotline for the movie, it
damn well should be!) Premise and movie title submitted anonymously via
Scoop Feedback.
Awaiting confirmation. [Thanks to...?]

March 23-25, 1996... Others out there in the electronic community have
send us their thoughts on
this rumored Aquator plotline, and the general sentiment is that it's
bogus. If the producers want to
generate audience build-up for the show, why go with Lazenby as the
villain; why not try for Sean
Connery? Doesn't this plot feel like a bad sequel to The Spy Who Loved
Me? And another
'stolen' nuclear warhead threat? But someone the Bond producers might be
dangling a carrot in
front of is Anthony Hopkins - as 007's nemesis. [Scoop feedback submitted
anonymously.]

Others have heard various snippets about the next Bond outine, and none
have included Lazenby,
stolen nuclear weapons, or megamaniacial billionaires with underwater
lairs in them. 'Clarke009'
heard that the proposed title of Bond #18 might be Dream Weaver - and has
read comments from
"Cubby" Brocolli that he'd never work with Lazenby again. [Thanks to
'Clarke009' and a slew of
anonymous letter-writers out there...]

So, is Aquator the name of the new Bond film, or will it be Dream Weaver?
Or is it all just a mess
of lies, innuendo, and falsehoods being released by a wealthy reclusive
madman with dreams of
global domination under his New World Order? Time will tell.

March 26-27, 1996... The next James Bond movie will not be based on any
John Gardner novel,
or for that matter the novel Colonel Sun, reports the screenwriter.
[Scoop info submitted
anonymously.]

Late March, 1996... One other has heard that the tentative release date
for this film is November
21, 1997. [Scoop reported by 'Clarke009'.]

April 3, 1996... Aquator haters will roll their eyes over this little
news item tossed our way:
sometime in March Jeffrey Caine, Bruce Feirstein, John Heinsleigh, Ron
Friedman and Fred
Wilkens (various studio employees responsible for Bond's last outing)
reportedly came to the Mall
of America for the grand opening of a 007 memoribilia store. In a Q&A
session, it was brought out
that the next Bond film is presently titled Zameer Aquator, and Lazenby
has been cast as the
nemesis "Zameer", an ex-CIA agent who teams up with an ex-KGB agent (to
be portrayed by
Terence Stamp). They steal nuclear missiles from the fallen Soviet Union
and hold the world under
siege. "Aquator" is the name of the base where the missiles are held.
Also mentioned was the casting
of the two new "Bond" girls - Natasha Henstridge (Species) and Salma
Hayek (From Dusk Till
Dawn, Desperado). If this info is true kiddies, then the casting reps for
the film work for MI5,
because nothing indicating any of the above actors has been reported
anywhere. Take it as you
like. [Scoop submitted anonymously.]

April 14, 1996... This just in: someone's informed us that Bruce
Feirstein has denied all rumors,
innuendo and speculation about the proposed Aquator storyline. Of course,
since this submitter was
anonymous, we can't confirm this speculation as well. However, once again
it should be stressed
that nothing concrete, save for Brosnan's involvement with the next Bond
film, has been officially
announced. [Scoop mailed anonymously.]

April 18, 1996... A rumor comes our way that Dean Devlin and Roland
Emmerich (creators of
Independence Day have expressed interest in the next Bond movie. Brosnan
has publically stated
that his choice would be Quentin Tarantino. [Scoop sent in by
'Sylvester'.]

April 30, 1996... Well, another possible Bond storyline has made its way
to ourselves. This one has
James on the run from bounty hunters from across the globe, hoping to net
a cool $1 billion dollars;
the person who gets the stuffed momento is none other than Blofeld's
daughter. As well, a rumored,
completely unconfirmed opening for the new film has Bond testing out a
new gimmick car through
the streets of London, chased by evil-doers - and M is his passenger. At
the end of the scene, with
the Z3 car in shambles, it launches a missile at a helicopter and breaks
in front of a crowd watching
the Queen on parade. Bond gets out, bows to Elizabeth II, who asks her
assistant who was that.
Reply (and duck if you didn't see it coming): "That, my Lady, is Her
Majesty's Secret Service."
[Scoop submitted anonymously - like you couldn't guess it already.]

May 4, 1996... The bounty hunter plotline sounds suspiciously like the
plotline from the John
Gardner novel Nobody Lives Forever. As the Bond producers have said
before, they will not be
using plotlines from any novels, Gardner or otherwise, for the next Bond
film. [Scoop info mailed in
by 'vcmr16c'.]

May 8, 1996... Anthony Hopkins and George Lazenby have reportedly turned
down any offers for
the new Bond show. Joe Don Baker, who portrayed CIA agent Jack Wade, is
reported to be
considering to return in the next installment. A new development has
Sharon Stone portraying
Blofeld's daughter as the main villain. [Scoop sent in anonymously.]

May 17, 1996... From the 'Get the Facts Straight' file: one Bond fan
would like it pointed out that
Lazenby had never been offered or considered for the villain in the new
Bond film, and Hopkins
hasn't been tendered any offer as yet. [Scoop information pointed out
anonymously.]

May 19, 1996... The producers have publically stated that Sharon Stone
will not be playing
Blofeld's daughter. [Scoop sent in anonymously.]

May 20, 1996... The Blofeld's daughter storyline sounds similar to a John
Gardner novel... and as
the producers have stated that the next Bond film will not use any
Gardner material, the rumor must
be bogus. [Scoop handed in anonymously.]

May 14-29, 1996... A number of Bond rumors, rumblings and fan's trains of
thought have been sent
to CA:

"It seems that this Aquator plot has been used once or twice before and
strikes me as being
unimaginative. The makers would do better to look at some of the comics
that have been
produced over the past few years, as the prospects could be a lot more
interesting." The
commentator also addressed the Tarantino-as-director rumor, asking why
the director of
GoldenEye, Martin Campbell, has been neglected. After all, didn't he have
a hand in the
re-invention success of the Bond franchise? [Provided anonymously.]

"I am Peter (formerly Petrov) Huczok. I was born 36 years ago in the
Ukraine. I have
appeared in 23 Russian films, currently living in England 1 year. My
agent has been
approached, I am to play KGB villain Zammeer (name not confirmed they say
it might
change.) I was told A. Hopkins turned down my role...I have signed
contract on May 2, 1996.
Script was written by Bruce Feirstein. I have met Michael Wilson in
London on May 1st,
1996." Unfortunately, the scoop provider did not leave us the means to
confirm this little tidbit, and it
must remain just a wild - but interesting - rumor. [Scoop provided by
'Peter Huczok'.]

A source indicates tell us that all information on possible storylines
and actors for the upcoming
Bond flick that have appeared so far is not true - save one. Anthony
Hopkins' name is being
considered, but without a script, it's pretty difficult to approach the
fella. [Scoop provided
anonymously.]

A rumor brought to us that is circulating on the "alt.fan.jamesbond"
newsgroup has the next Bond
movie titled "The Property of a Lady". The plotline would center on the
return of Hong Kong to
Chinese governship. The title is a reference to a short story by Ian
Fleming. [Scoop sent in by
'jjonnzz'.]

Another e-mail informs us that the band Oasis may be in talks for the
theme song. Also mentioned is
the rumor that Jack Nicholson may be up for the role of Blofeld's
brother. [Scoop comes from an
anonymous source.]

Another submitter tells us that the 18th Bond film is scheduled to go
into production before the end
of 1996. MGM/UA wants to follow-up on the huge success of the previous
film, and a $100 million
budget is expected. Martin Campbell and DoP Phil Meheux are expected to
return, plus Remy
Julienne in charge of the stunts. Co-producer Michael G. Wilson has a
stunt planned which involves
Bond and a girl parachuting from an exploding helicopter, falling through
a chasm of rock and
pursued by the spinning rotor blades from the 'copter. The stunt was
originally pencilled in for
GoldenEye but deemed too expensive and dangerous. China could be a
possible location for
filming. [Scoop mailed in by 'Ernst Stavro Blofeld' from Murren,
Switzerland.]

Yet another contributor lets us know that the storyline will go back to
Bond's early years, sort of a
prequel of sorts, and showcase how he got the double-O moniker (a.k.a.
his licence to kill.) [Scoop
info submitted anonymously.]

"Quentin Tarantino has reportedly signed to direct the next Bond film for
$3.2 million. The
producers are eager to see how Tarantino handles the assignment and may
be looking for a
multipicture deal if they like the project." [Scoop provided - of course
- anonymously.]

This contributor also claims that all the Aquator and Blofeld's daughter
rumors are utterly false, and
then goes on to mention that Cubbi Broccoli has chosen a bacterial
weapons ...

read more »


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Roberta Ann Pisano  
View profile  
 More options Jun 3 1996, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.fan.james-bond
From: rober...@ix.netcom.com(Roberta Ann Pisano)
Date: 1996/06/03
Subject: Re: BOND #18

This post comes from ameth...@dlcwest.com, she was having problems
posting to the newsgroup, so I am doing it for her:

Kurt Martin <ro...@worldlink.ca> wrote:
>This contributor also claims that all the Aquator and Blofeld's
daughter
>rumors are utterly false, and
>then goes on to mention that Cubbi Broccoli has chosen a bacterial
>weapons plot device for the new
>flick pitched by freelance writer David Sommes. Initial reports have
>Broccoli favoring locations in
>Canada, Thailand and Italy. [Scoop sent in by M.S.]

I would like to see a good deal of the on-location shooting in
Canada...preferably western Canada, since it's more scenic.  But I am
biased...I'm a Canadian.  And I can't deny the ulterior motives...I'm a
Pierce Brosnan fan.  

It would be nice, but <sigh> if it's rumoured, it probably won't
happen.
Chances are the writers will wade through all the rumours and write
something that goes completely against them.

>"Sean Connery is rumored to be offered the role of the villain in the
>next Bond film. Those
>around him say that he is thrilled with the idea...however [his] agent
>has denied the
>rumors..." [Scoop submitted by 'ksjs'.]
>As well, two others mention the Connery rumor, one from a New York
radio
>station - both
>anonymous.

It would be interesting to see Connery as a villain, but I think Pierce
would find this difficult to deal with.  He does like and admire the
man as an actor and he felt that Sean was the best Bond and he does try
to bring back to the character some of what Sean gave Bond in the first
place.  

BUT...remember there was an interview where Pierce was relieved that
they used a new studio instead of Pinewood because he felt that there
would be "ghosts" of Sean and Roger there and that would have made it
difficult for him.  I think it would be even more difficult for him to
play Bond opposite Sean Connery.

Now, I am not saying that Pierce is not a good actor and couldn't
handle it...I think he could if he had to.  But it likely wouldn't sit
well with him, as much as I'm sure he would like to work with Sean.  

I'm sure if he were given the chance to work with Sean Connery on
another project, he would jump at the chance, but not Bond.

>So, you sort through the information and see what settles at the
bottom
>and top. Personally, I think
>we need the resources of MI5 to keep up with the Bond dis-information
and  
>speculation.

Well, like I said above, I think they are going to wade throught all
the rumours and go completely against them.  That's what I'd do if I
were them to avoid any advance knowledge.  In fact, I might even plant
a few rumours if I were the writer, just to throw people completely
off.

-=Aine=-


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Discussion subject changed to "BOND #18 [Station C]" by Z. A. Surve&#39;
Z. A. Surve'  
View profile  
 More options Jun 4 1996, 3:00 am
Newsgroups: alt.fan.james-bond
From: az...@socsci.uct.ac.za (Z. A. Surve')
Date: 1996/06/04
Subject: Re: BOND #18 [Station C]

I agree!! (with the bias part too :-), but yes, Station C would DEFINTELY make
a fantastic place to shoot: Alberta, Quebec City/Montreal, or Ottawa in the
winter. Canada is far to picture-perfect picturesque to shoot in the summer.
Canada's real beauty is in the winter, very stark, cruel and merciless. A
metafor for Bond's character. I was always hoping for, that Bond might go off
to Montreal and Quebec City in search of some violent separatist faction of
the PQ, and get involved with some French_Canadian double agent. Theme song:
Celine Dion. Oh well, I can only dream :-)

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »