How to handle Islamic supremacists with Western citizenship
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/07/how-to-handle-islamic-supremacists-with-western-citizenship.html
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
fanabba
Jai Maharaj) wrote:
> How to handle Islamic supremacists with Western citizenship
>
>
> Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> Om Shanti
These are good ideas !
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
fanabba <fan...@aol.com> posted:
>
> Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> > How to handle Islamic supremacists with Western citizenship
> >
> > http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/07/how-to-handle-islamic-supremacists-...
>
Yes they are! A comment from the web page:
By Jaladhi
July 20, 2011
These morons continually show that they will never integrate with the
West nor will show any respect for our laws or for any other
religion. They need to be sent back to their Islamic hell holes now.
Period.
We are being delusional if we think Muslims are here to live like any
other normal human being and their repatriation to their motherlands
is in order. Besides this, Islam has to be banned in all non-Muslim
lands where they have invaded forcefully own their own or peacefully
with the complicity of Western leaders.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/07/how-to-handle-islamic-supremacists-with-western-citizenship.html
Topaz
Today let's talk about some of the things that have changed in America
since September 11. I'm not thinking about all of the new rigamarole
at airports. I'm more interested in the changes in the Politically
Correct party line laid down for the lemmings by the media. I'm
interested in changes in the way Americans view the world. And I'm
interested in the changed prospects for the future of America.
The most interesting thing about the new party line is its stupidity.
The Jews were caught by surprise last month, and they had to whip up
something in a hurry in order to deflect blame from Israel and from
the U.S. government's support for Israel. Apparently the best they
could do on a moment's notice is the explanation that Osama bin Laden
attacked us simply because he hates our freedom and democracy. Since
they first cooked up that explanation they've refined it quite a bit.
Both the Foreign Ministry in Israel and the American Israel Public
Affairs Committee, Israel's enormously powerful lobby in Washington,
have been circulating "talking papers" to their own people, to
politicians, and to everyone else who is likely to be making a public
statement about America's new war or about Washington's past policy in
the Middle East.
These "talking papers" tell people how to counter what the Jews call
Osama bin Laden's "lies" and also how to respond to anyone who
suggests that our government's support of Israel might have had
something to do with the September 11 attack. The papers warn people
never to raise this subject, but if someone else insists on talking
about it, it is to be countered with the explanation that support for
Israel had nothing at all to do with the attack, that we would have
been attacked even if we weren't supporting Israel, and that the only
reason for the attack is Osama bin Laden's irrational hatred of
America's freedom and democracy.
I believe that it's clear that many people actually believe this
nonsense, judging by the number of cars with red, white, and blue
ribbons tied to their antennas. But these are the people who believe
everything Tom Brokaw or their beloved Big Brother in the White House
tells them. If George Bush came on TV and told them with that
mock-solemn expression of his that a Martian invasion force had just
landed, that the Martians were demanding one million sacrificial
virgins as their price for not destroying Hollywood and Washington,
and that U.S. Army troops would be going door to door to collect
virgins, the folks with the ribbons on their antennas would believe
it, and they would prepare to hand over any virgins in their
households. They would consider it their patriotic duty. The party
line may change from time to time, but lemmings never change.
Well, the lemmings may believe that U.S. support for Israel had
nothing to do with the September 11 attack or with the anthrax-laden
letters now going around, but no one else believes it. Last week the
media bosses were kicking themselves because they had let the text of
a statement Osama bin Laden had made be published in the United
States. They said that they had made a mistake in putting this
statement before the American public. They wouldn't publish any
further Osama bin Laden statements, they said, because the statements
might contain secret instructions for his operatives.
Everyone I've spoken with laughed at that excuse. In his last
statement Osama bin Laden said that Americans would not be secure and
would have no peace of mind as long as Palestinians were not secure in
their own land. That's the sort of powerful and simple message that
even Sally Soccer Mom and Joe Sixpack might understand, and that's
what the Jewish media bosses don't want the public to hear. They're
not worried about secret instructions; they're worried about the
lemmings figuring out what's going on.
Actually, I think there's very little danger of that. And really, the
changes I'm more interested in are in the outlook of the minority of
the population able to think for itself: the minority that doesn't
believe whatever Tom Brokaw says. You know, I've been talking to this
minority for years-decades, actually-warning them about the
consequences of letting their government get out of control, warning
them of the consequences of permitting the Jews of Hollywood and New
York to run our country through their control of our mass media,
warning them of the consequences of continuing to sit on their hands
and keep their mouths shut from fear of being denounced by the media
as "anti-Semites" or "racists."
And I wasn't having as much success as I wanted at getting them to pay
attention and change their ways. Many of those who listened wouldn't
do anything because what I was warning them about didn't seem quite
real. Despite all the changes they could see around them-the
deterioration of our cities and our schools, the darkening of the
racial complexion of America, the trashing of our culture by the mass
media, the increasingly obvious efforts of the Jewish media bosses to
persuade our young women that they should bed down with
non-Whites-despite everything, they themselves managed to remain
comfortable and economically secure, so the things I was warning them
about didn't seem quite real. They had convinced themselves that they
were above it all, that they could continue to watch the destruction
of their country and their people all around them, and it would never
affect them personally: that they could remain secure and comfortable
while everything around them went to hell.
Osama bin Laden jolted some of them awake on September 11: some of
those whose attention I hadn't been able to catch with my own
warnings. He convinced some of them that what they had been observing
going on around them for years was in fact real: that continuing to
ignore the degenerative processes promoted by the media and the
government and hoping for the best really wasn't a good strategy for
personal survival. In particular, he convinced many members of the
thinking minority that losing control of our government really is a
serious matter, that permitting our government to be used by the Jews
against their neighbors in the Middle East- and also against the
genuine interests of the American people- could have real consequences
at home.
I have the feeling that many of these thinking people are paying at
least a little more attention now to the things we've been talking
about here every week. The fact that the number of people who download
these broadcasts from my Web site each Saturday has nearly doubled
since September 11 is a pretty good indication of this, I believe.
Just as I'm getting more hate mail from the red-white-and-blue-ribbon
types, I'm also getting more thoughtful responses from the people who
understand and care. Which is to say, I think I have an audience now
that not only is bigger but also is more attentive and responsive.
That is really important.
I'm not discouraged by the fact that the attentive and responsive
people still constitute only a minority of a minority. I'm encouraged
by the fact that the attentive people now make up a larger minority of
the thinking portion of the population than they did before September
11. Important things always are done by minorities. Majorities don't
make decisions; individuals do; small minorities do. History is made
by active minorities. Sometimes an active minority may use the passive
majority as a tool or a weapon, but the minority always acts in accord
with its own will.
What's important is which minority is making the decisions, which
minority is active at any particular moment. For at least the past 60
years it's been the wrong minority, an alien minority that is
implacably hostile to our people. If we are to survive, that must
change. Our minority must become active instead. Our minority must
grow to include more of the thinking portion of our population. And
that is happening now. That's been happening since September 11.
The people who understand and care have been forced to begin paying
attention. I have a very strong premonition that there will be other
things in the reasonably near future that will make them pay even
closer attention.
The Bush government, just like the Clinton government before it,
thinks that it can stop terrorism with cruise missiles and smart
bombs. But just think for a moment: whether Osama bin Laden survives
the Bush government's current war against Israel's enemies in the
Middle East or not, he already has become immortal. In the eyes of
Muslims he has been elevated to a status in heaven alongside Mohammed.
His name will be praised, and stories will be told about him around
campfires throughout the Muslim world for countless generations to
come, long after the Bush government has gone and been forgotten.
Cruise missiles can't take Osama bin Laden's immortality away from
him. There's nothing the Bush government can do to diminish his glory
in the Muslim world. In fact, the more cruise missiles and smart bombs
the United States unleashes on the Muslim world, the higher will Osama
bin Laden's esteem rise; the more will his strike against the United
States seem justified to his fellow Muslims.
Don't be fooled by the tame "house Muslims" the media bosses have been
trotting out to explain to the lemmings that violence is abhorrent to
"real Muslims." The real Muslims are the ones rioting against the
government in Pakistan now. The real Muslims are the ones singing
Osama bin Laden's praises now. And there will be no shortage of other
young Muslims lusting for a share in his glory, lusting to have their
praises sung around campfires too. Cruise missiles don't frighten
them. There are enough of them already in this country to keep things
jumping, thanks to the government's insane immigration policy of
recent decades.
At the University of California in Los Angeles a library worker,
53-year-old Jonnie Hargis, has been suspended without pay because he
sent out an e-mail letter criticizing U.S. support for Israel's
aggression. The university administration explained that it has a
policy against using university computers for political messages, but
Hargis, who has worked at the UCLA library for 22 years, pointed out
that no one who has been sending out pro-Israel and pro-war messages
has been punished.
There are similar situations at other universities around the country.
Jews and neo-conservatives post belligerent, bloodthirsty messages
calling for the annihilation of all of the Jews' enemies in the Middle
East, including Iraq and Iran as well as Afghanistan. Anyone who calls
instead for eliminating the cause of the September 11 attack- that is,
for stopping the blind support by the U.S. government of Israel's
aggression- is censured and threatened with expulsion or with being
fired.
There are still people around who can remember how it was at our
universities during the Vietnam war. That was when treason ruled on
campuses. Students burned their draft cards and put up Viet Cong flags
and posters of Ho Chi Minh in their dormitories. Jewish activists in
groups such as Students for a Democratic Society organized pro-Viet
Cong rallies on campuses. Professors encouraged this activity, and
administrators didn't interfere, citing free speech.
The switch to red, white, and blue ribbons and saluting the flag came
rather suddenly last month, and a lot of thinking people understand
why it came. They understand that it is when America is involved in a
war to promote Jewish interests that pledging allegiance to the flag
suddenly is declared fashionable. When Israel's welfare is threatened,
Jews, ordinarily noted for their cynicism and irreverence, suddenly
put their hands over their hearts and begin singing The Star-Spangled
Banner, and they glare at anyone who isn't singing loudly enough. And
people who make the mistake of asking why get fired or suspended. But
you know, firing people or suspending people who have dissenting
opinions doesn't go down well with the independent thinkers. And I'll
guarantee you:
there will be a lot more dissent before this war is over. And the
Jewish media won't be able to hide it all.
What we are beginning to see now is a sharpening division between the
Jews, their bought politicians, and the "I pledge allegiance,"
authoritarian types on one side, and everyone else on the other side.
We also saw a division, along different lines, during the Vietnam war,
with the authoritarians and the Jews on opposite sides instead of the
same side. I believe that the division this time will develop faster
and become sharper.
I don't know how the war itself will develop. It was clear before it
began that the U.S. military machine is quite capable of flattening
Afghanistan or any other Third World country without suffering any
significant losses to its own personnel, simply because we can hit
them from a distance with a great deal of destructive power, and they
don't have the means to hit back-except through what we call
"terrorism." It is certain that there will be more terrorism,
although, of course, I cannot predict the form it will take or its
magnitude.
I can predict, however, that the media and the politicians will
denounce it as "cowardly" and will act as if America has been wronged:
that whatever form the next blow against America takes and wherever it
comes from, it will be declared "unprovoked." And I can predict that
the polls published by the media will continue to show nearly every
American wildly enthusiastic about the war, even as the opposition to
the war grows.
One interesting thing about the opposition this time is that it is
growing both among the Gentile Left and among genuine patriots. During
the Vietnam war the members of the Gentile Left all were on the Jewish
side. Despite the current agreement between leftists and patriots on
the single issue of ending support for Israel and limiting the war in
the Middle East, I don't see much chance of real collaboration between
these two elements.
The Gentile Left is still hopelessly confused on such essential
issues as race and feminism and homosexuality and permissiveness. But
the war is indeed driving a wedge between Jews and Gentile leftists-a
deeper wedge than that driven by the development of Jewish
neo-conservatism after the Vietnam war, and for that we should be
thankful.
There may be other hopeful developments as well. The assassination in
Jerusalem this week of one of Israel's most bloodthirsty Jewish
militants by the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine
certainly was a welcome move. Until now all of the assassins have been
Jews, and all of the victims have been Palestinians. It's too soon to
know whether or not this one act of retribution against the Israeli
leadership will be followed by other successful blows, but it may be
that the events of recent weeks have emboldened the Palestinians to
act with more imagination and enterprise than before.
Looking ahead a bit, there are several signs of hope here on our own
home front. The heightened sense of reality among non-lemmings, the
lessening of their sense of detachment, the stronger realization that
they cannot survive by continuing to sit on their hands and watch the
Jews destroy the world around them- this is the single most important
consequence of recent events. This, together with the growing
alienation between Gentile leftists and Jews, leaves the Jews in a
weaker position than they have been in a long time. They will crack
their whips more frantically than before, trying to keep everyone in
line, but the principal effect of that will be to generate even more
resentment against them.
Things are a bit brittle now. A few dozen more anthrax cases, another
truck bomb in a well chosen location, and substantial changes could
take place in a hurry: a stock market panic, martial law measures by
the Bush government, and a sharpening of the debate as to how we got
ourselves get into this mess in the first place. As the debate
sharpens, the Jews and their collaborators will pull out all of the
stops in an effort to stifle it, but I don't think that even a
declaration of martial law can stifle it now. Too many people already
smell the stink in Washington. Too many people already understand on
whose hands is the blood of 6,000 innocent Americans who died last
month. Too many people understand the true motivation behind the
current war against Israel's enemies in the Middle East. The genie is
out of the bottle now, and not even Mr. Bush's new anti-terrorism
agency-what does he call it? -- the Office of Homeland Security? --
not even this new Federal agency can put it back in the bottle.
It's a strange thing: in a novel I wrote more than 12 years ago - the
title is Hunter-I talked about the formation of a new anti-terrorism
agency, separate from the FBI. And I pointed out that the principal
aim of the new agency would not be to protect the public from
terrorism, but to protect the government from an increasingly restless
and disillusioned public: a sort of modern Praetorian Guard. I think
that we'll be seeing more developments in that direction in the next
few months, with the timing depending upon when the next surprise
comes and its magnitude.
Of course, I don't know what will happen next to shatter already
jangled nerves, but it is likely that something will happen. My advice
to responsible patriots now is this: Expect a surprise, and remain
calm when it comes. But don't wait for it to come to raise your voice.
Speak out now. Don't be intimidated by the mindless yahoos waving
their flags or by the government or by the media. If you point out
calmly and in a reasoned way who is responsible for what happened to
America last month you will have more people agreeing with you than
you might imagine. If you call for your fellow Americans to join you
in regaining control of their government, the response will be greater
than at any time in recent years.
Thanks for being with me again today.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
Topaz
Liberating America From Israel
by Paul Findley
Nine-eleven would not have occurred if the U.S. government had refused
to help Israel humiliate and destroy Palestinian society. Few express
this conclusion publicly, but many believe it is the truth. I believe
the catastrophe could have been prevented if any U.S. president during
the past 35 years had had the courage and wisdom to suspend all U.S.
aid until Israel withdrew from the Arab land seized in the 1967
Arab-Israeli war.
The U.S. lobby for Israel is powerful and intimidating, but any
determined president-even President Bush this very day-could prevail
and win overwhelming public support for the suspension of aid by
laying these facts before the American people:
Israel's present government, like its predecessors, is determined to
annex the West Bank-biblical Judea and Samaria - so Israel will become
Greater Israel. Ultra-Orthodox Jews, who maintain a powerful role in
Israeli politics, believe the Jewish Messiah will not come until
Greater Israel is a reality. Although a minority in Israel, they are
committed, aggressive, and influential. Because of deep religious
conviction, they are determined to
prevent Palestinians from gaining statehood on any part of the West
Bank.
In its violent assaults on Palestinians, Israel uses the pretext of
eradicating terrorism, but its forces are actually engaged advancing
the territorial expansion just cited. Under the guise of
anti-terrorism, Israeli forces treat Palestinians worse than cattle.
With due process nowhere to be found, hundreds are detained for long
periods and most are tortured. Some are assassinated. Homes, orchards,
and business places are destroyed. Entire cities are kept under
intermittent curfew, some confinements lasting for
weeks. Injured or ill Palestinians needing emergency medical care are
routinely held at checkpoints for an hour or more. Many children are
undernourished. The West Bank and Gaza have become giant concentration
camps. None of this could have occurred without U.S. support. Perhaps
Israeli officials believe life will become so unbearable that most
Palestinians will eventually leave their ancestral homes.
Once beloved worldwide, the U.S. government finds itself reviled in
most countries because it provides unconditional support of Israeli
violations of the United Nations Charter, international law, and the
precepts of all major religious faiths.
How did the American people get into this fix?
Nine-eleven had its principal origin 35 years ago when Israel's U.S.
lobby began its unbroken success in stifling debate about the proper
U.S. role in the Arab-Israeli conflict and effectively concealed from
public awareness the fact that the U.S. government gives massive
uncritical support to Israel.
Thanks to the suffocating influence of Israel's U.S. lobby, open
discussion of the Arab-Israeli conflict has been non-existent in our
government all these years. I have firsthand knowledge, because I was
a member of the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee in
June 1967 when Israeli military forces took control of the Golan
Heights, a part of Syria, as well as the Palestinian West Bank and
Gaza. I continued as a member for 16 years and to this day maintain a
close watch on Congress.
For 35 years, not a word has been expressed in that committee or in
either chamber of Congress that deserves to be called debate on Middle
East policy. No restrictive or limiting amendments on aid to Israel
have been offered for 20 years, and none of the few offered in
previous years received more than a handful of votes. On Capitol Hill,
criticism of Israel, even in private conversation, is all but
forbidden, treated as downright unpatriotic, if not anti-Semitic. The
continued absence of free speech was assured when those few who spoke
out-Senators Adlai Stevenson and Charles Percy, and Reps. Paul
"Pete" McCloskey, Cynthia McKinney, Earl Hilliard, and myself-were
defeated at the polls by candidates heavily financed by pro-Israel
forces.
As a result, legislation dealing with the Middle East has been heavily
biased in favor of Israel and against Palestinians and other Arabs
year after year. Home constituencies, misled by news coverage equally
lop-sided in Israel's favor, remain largely unaware that Congress
behaves as if it were a subcommittee of the Israeli parliament.
However, the bias is widely noted beyond America, where most news
media candidly cover Israel's conquest and generally excoriate
America's complicity and complacency. When President Bush welcomed
Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, sometimes called the Butcher of
Beirut, as "my dear friend" and "a man of peace" after Israeli forces,
using U.S.-donated arms, completed their devastation of the West Bank
last spring, worldwide anger against American policy reached the
boiling point.
The fury should surprise no one who reads foreign newspapers or
listens to BBC. In several televised statements long before 9/11,
Osama bin Laden, believed by U.S. authorities to have masterminded
9/11, cited U.S. complicity in Israel's destruction of Palestinian
society as a principal complaint. Prominent foreigners, in and out of
government, express their opposition to U.S. policies with
unprecedented frequency and severity, especially since Bush announced
his determination to make war against Iraq.
The lobby's intimidation remains pervasive. It seems to reach every
government center and even houses of worship and revered institutions
of higher learning. It is highly effective in silencing the many U.S.
Jews who object to the lobby's tactics and Israel's brutality...
Today, a year after 9/11, President Bush has made no attempt to
redress grievances, or even to identify them. In fact, he has made the
scene far worse by supporting Israel's religious war against
Palestinians, an alliance that has intensified anti-American anger. He
seems oblivious to the fact that nearly two billion people worldwide
regard the plight of Palestinians as today's most important
foreign-policy challenge. No one in authority will admit a calamitous
reality that is skillfully shielded from the American people but
clearly recognized by most of the world: America suffered 9/11 and its
aftermath and may soon be at war with Iraq, mainly because U.S. policy
in the Middle East is made in Israel, not in Washington.
Israel is a scofflaw nation and should be treated as such. Instead of
helping Sharon intensify Palestinian misery, our president should
suspend all aid until Israel ends its occupation of Arab land Israel
seized in 1967. The suspension would force Sharon's compliance or lead
to his removal from office, as the Israeli electorate will not
tolerate a prime minister who is at odds with the White House.
If Bush needs an additional reason for doing the right thing, he can
justify the suspension as a matter of military necessity, an essential
step in winning international support for his war on terrorism. He can
cite a worthy precedent. When President Abraham Lincoln issued the
proclamation that freed only the slaves in states that were then in
rebellion, he make the restriction because of "military necessity."
If Bush suspends U.S. aid, he will liberate all Americans from long
years of bondage to Israel's misdeeds.
Mr. Paul Findley, who served as a Republican congressman from Illinois
for 22 years, is the author of 'They Dare to Speak Out' and a member
of the American Educational Trust's Foreign Relations Committee.
Also See: http://www.stop-us-military-aid-to-israel.net/
Citizens for Fair Legislation ALERT: NO NEW AID TO ISRAEL
http://sf.indymedia.org/news/2003/01/1556560.php
Congressman Paul Findley: Liberating America From Israel
http://www.mediamonitors.net/findley2.html
Pat Buchanan: Why Politicians Prefer Israel over American
Interest?
http://amconmag.com/01_13_03/buchanan7.html
Israeli Minister - 'We've Become Barbarians'
http://rense.com/general33/become.htm
Wales Politician Compares Apartheid Israel to Nazi Germany
http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100news/0200wales/page.cfm?objectid=12498073
&method=full&siteid=50082
Israel's image of liberal democracy takes a battering
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/01/04/wisr04.xml&s
Sheet=/news/2003/01/04/ixworld.html
Israel Bans Christian Politician and Party from Election
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/1845530.stm
Israel to Expel Christian Politician and non-Jewish Parties from
Knesset
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,866348,00.html
Row over Arabs' election ban
http://www.dailytelegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/01/01/wisr01.
xml&sSheet=/news/2003/01/01/ixnewstop.html
How Americas Zionist controlled media spin the facts.
http://jerusalem.indymedia.org/news/2002/12/98414_comment.php
American Media Controlled by Israeli Supporters
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Eric+Alterman+MSNBC+Israel&hl=en&lr=&ie=UT
F-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=3caaa1d0_1%40news.tm.net.my&rnum=1
The Myth of Barak's Generous Offer
http://fair.org/extra/0207/generous.html
Direct Financial Cost of Israel to US: $1.6 trillion and
growing
http://www.csmonitor.com/2002/1209/p16s01-wmgn.html
MAKING MERCHANDISE OUT OF THE PEOPLE OF GOD: SELLING THE UPCOMING
WAR IN
IRAQ http://www.endtimesnetwork.com/m2_s1.html
Zionism Unbound - Vidal Gored 16 Years Ago
http://www.rense.com/general32/unbound.htm
'It's Time To Get Tough With Israel' - Patriotic US Army Brig
General
http://www.rense.com/general33/tough.htm
Israel's Policy Of 'Covert Aggression'
http://www.rense.com/general31/ze.htm
ISRAEL'S SACRED TERRORISM
http://abbc.com/historia/zionism/rokach.html
The Men From JINSA and CSP
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020902&c=1&s=vest
JINSA Behind Drive To Cover-Up Israeli Spy Scandal
http://rense.com/general18/JINSA.HTM
Christian Coalition Abandonment of Palestinian Christians is
Hypocritical http://www.mediamonitors.net/sherri64.html
Where does world-famous televangelist's money go?
http://www.msnbc.com/news/845747.asp#BODY
Christian Patriarch of Holy Land calls for end of Oppressive
Israeli
occupation http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2604761.stm
Zionism versus the Bible - Peace and Jutice on Earth or the
Extremism of
the 'Christian' Right? http://www.mediamonitors.net/williamson4.html
THE UNHOLY ALLIANCE - Christianity & The NWO
http://www.rense.com/general20/unholy.htm
No Joy in Bethlehem
http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/comment/0,10551,865083,00.html
'Saddest Christmas Ever' in Bethlehem
http://dailynews.att.net/cgi-bin/news?e=pri&dt=021225&cat=news&st=newsmideas
tdc
For Unbiased News, visit:
http://www.commondreams.org
http://www.rense.com/
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/
http://www.independent.co.uk/
http://www.thenation.com/
http://www.mediamonitors.net/
http://www.antiwar.com/
http://www.fair.org/
http://www.counterpunch.com/
http://www.indymedia.org/
http://www.progressive.org/
http://www.yellowtimes.org/
http://www.latimes.com/
For Good Analysis and Commentary, visit:
http://www.zmag.org/chomsky/
http://www.robert-fisk.com/
http://www.iacenter.org/
http://www.tikkun.org/magazine/index.cfm
http://www.antiwar.com/hacohen/h-col.html
http://www.nader.org/public_interest.html
http://reese.king-online.com/
http://fair.org/media-beat/
http://avnery-news.co.il/english/
Please distribute....
Topaz
www.mantra.com/jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj) wrote:
>These morons continually show that they will never integrate with the
>West
The West is the White race.
The goal of America is to destroy the White race. The
multi-culture and pluralism they push is only at the expense of
Whites. No one is trying to push multi-culture in China or Japan or
anyplace but on the Whites. And they promote racial intermarriage.
If things continue as they are the White race is doomed.
And who is doing all of this? It is the USA government and the
media, in other words the Jews.
Many Whites are traitors. They support the USA government and their
own destruction. We should look for allies. And anyone who wants to
remove the Jews from power is our ally. In the past the Japanese were
our allies. Today it is the Muslims.
Osama bin Laden
September 24th statement published in Pakistan
"I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We
are against the system, which makes other nations slaves of the United
States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic
freedom. This system is totally in control of the American Jews, whose
first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is simply that the
American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced
to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the
punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it
is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the
U.S. is not uttering a single word."
Michael Ejercito
Nothing you say or write will change that.
Michael
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
fanabba <fan...@aol.com> posted:
>
> Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> > How to handle Islamic supremacists with Western citizenship
> >
> > http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/07/how-to-handle-islamic-supremacists-...
>
> These are good ideas !
Yes they are! A comment from the web page:
By Jaladhi
July 20, 2011
These morons continually show that they will never integrate with the
Sfinx
Jai Maharaj) wrote:
> How to handle Islamic supremacists with Western citizenship
>
>
> Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> Om Shanti
Deport.
Topaz
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
> The goal
of anyone with a conscience is to see Nazi slime exterminated.
Y.
--
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
'This country exists as the fulfillment of a promise made by G-d
Himself. It would be ridiculous to ask it to account for its
legitimacy' (Golda Meir (1898 - 1978))
B J Foster
>
> The West is the White race.
Wee Willie izza White-supremacist Wanker
>
> The goal of America is to destroy the White race. The
So the goal of 'America' is to destroy the West?
>
> Osama bin Laden
Captain America?
>
>
> http://www.kookoo.org/ http://www.klutz.con http://www.klan.org
>
> http://heretica1.com/ http://immigration-g1obalization.blogspot.com/
Topaz
"Jews always position themselves as mediators. These
nasties hold it cardinal they accredit and interpret *everything*.
Nothing has worth or meaning until it's pronounced upon by a generous
scoop of shit in a hate hat. Nothing must be expressed save in jewish
terms. Invaders become undocumented workers. Queers become gays.
Freakins become African-Americans. Attack on Iraq becomes defense of
America. Nothing is legitimate save Big Kike stamp off on it.
BK doesn't like it when a Sheehan steps forward and foghorns facts to
fodder. Instantly, like mosquitoes at twilight, a flock of
bloodthirsty kikes appears, buzzing and sucking and whining. Have you
ever noticed that it is impossible to criticize jews and keep your
character? The jews have literally billions of enemies worldwide, yet
not a single one of them is an honest man of laudable motive. It is
impossible to carry off this charade without controlling the media
and a hell of a lot of other things too. The minute jew-criticism
appears, the ashkenazis and appeaser annies begin the smear. No one
ever opposed a loving kike except invidiously. Smear campaigns are
media control in action. There are other aspects of media control, but
day in day out, making horrible shrieks and gurgles to keep the goyish
herd away from the healthy green fields is the workaday business of
the controllers. Jews determine which issues may be debated, and in
what terms. Jews make up more than fifty percent of the experts on
both sides of these tiny debates. A few vetted goyim are allowed
through to keep up the charade of democratic discussion. The Internet
is the only medium that prevents the illusion of popular conformity
with jewthink being carried off. All that is necessary for jews to
maintain control is to create a congenial if bogus reality through
television and the main dailies, and relentlessly enforce this
orthodoxy through smear campaigns against any who breach it.
The death of a son is one of the few motives strong enough to drive
average goy fodder to breach etiquette and speak truth to kikes. She
must be shut down. How to do that? You can see the jews' uncertainty.
They attack her, at the same time, as both a lefty and a nazi.
Illogical, but in time they'll settle on an approach. Sometimes just
throwing shit and see what sticks is the best way. How dare Sheehan
value her own son more than the interests of Israel?
I say my son died for LIES. George Bush LIED to us and he knew he
was LYING.
And none of the thick rancid honkings Limbaugh and the freeper
patriotards can gainsay it. Remember that bushy came out of manly
Barbara, the wizened maw who asked why she should trouble her
"beautiful mind" about the body bags coming back from Iraq. You know -
the ones you never see, because they have to show you endless pictures
of $440,000-compensated jews being "ethnically cleansed," sniff, yet
again. Only an anti-Semite puts his own life before Israel. The jews
are the one people on earth who routinely are absolved of guilt for
that for which they and they alone are guilty. Isn't that odd?
DaX
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
Topaz
"The 1950s-1960s civil-rights movement might go unnoticed by many
White citizens if it were not for the fact that that movement was
created and steered by Jews, not by Blacks. Indeed, the NAACP was
founded by and run for many years by Jews, such as the Spingarn
brothers. Other key Jews in the NAACP included Henry Moskowitz,
Lillian Wald, Jack Greenberg and Kivie Kaplan.
The groundbreaking Brown v. Board of Education court ruling in 1954
resulted almost entirely from the work of Jewish lawyers connected
with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, for example Jack Greenberg. Indeed,
the legal brief for the Brown case was signed almost exclusively by
Jews. Jewish activist Esther Swirk Brown was also a prime player in
the Brown case. In fact, Swirk Brown actually launched the Brown case
herself [3].
Furthermore, the constitutionally questionable U.S. Civil Rights Act
of 1964 came from a Jew, i.e., Congressman Celler's House bill H.R.
7152. That act created, among other things, affirmative action. It
ended the practice of business owners deciding for themselves whom to
hire and fire. In fact, the destruction of White rights in America was
caused largely by the Jewish-created/led civil-rights movement.
The civil-rights movement also transformed the attitudes of American
Blacks: before the civil-rights movement Blacks were largely
respectful of Whites. Today Blacks openly denigrate White culture and
challenge White authority. They demand that 'whitey' now show them
respect which they may or may not have earned...
Jews have also led the movement in the U.S. Congress to open America
to non-European immigration. The best example of that is the 1965
Immigration Act, aka the Hart-Celler Act, which resulted in a
revolutionary change in U.S. immigration rules. Congressman Emanuel
Celler was the point man for that law, even though he is listed
second, after Hart, in the title 'Hart-Celler.' Indeed, President
Johnson mentioned Celler twice at the signing of the bill - H.R. 2580
into law on Oct. 3, 1965 but did not mention Hart. Other Jews in
Congress also spearheaded the movement to allow more non-Europeans
into America, such as Jacob Javits and Herbert Lehman. And an
influential Jewish immigration lawyer named Edward Dubroff regularly
advised Congressman Celler about immigration issues.
Additionally, powerful Jewish organizations carried out intense,
ongoing campaigns in order to pressure individual Congressmen to vote
for the loosening of U.S. immigration laws. At nearly every step of
the campaign to alter U.S. immigration laws, Jews were at the
forefront....
The controversial 1951 UN/UNESCO 'Statement on the Nature of Race and
Race Differences,' which denied many human racial differences, was
largely the invention of infamous Jewish anthropologist Ashley
Montagu. Here we see the doggedness of the Jewish agenda on race, for
as far back as 1935, Franz Boas - the Jewish godfather of race-denial
who inspired Montagu's efforts - approached two top scientists and
asked them to create an anti-racism/race-denial statement, which would
be signed by many other scientists and then publicized. Both of the
scientists that Boas approached - anthropologist and psychologist
Livingston Farrand and biologist Raymond Pearl - turned Boas down. Not
one to give up easily, Boas then approached yet another race expert,
anthropologist Earnest Hooton. Hooton agreed to create such a race
statement (he sent it to seven top scientists but only one signed
it)...
Other top experts who created race-denying/race-downplaying material
for the UN or UNESCO were also Jewish, including Melville Herskovits,
Otto Klineberg and Harry Shapiro. In fact, Jews virtually pioneered
the questionable-but-now-common 'official' theory that racial
differences between Whites and non-Whites do not really exist. The
teachings of the Jews mentioned above were used to drastically alter
Western culture, e.g. in arguing for the enactment of civil-rights
legislation...
The American political Left was built largely by Jews. For example,
Jewish Frankfurt School icon Herbert Marcuse laid the foundation for
the American 'hippie' counterculture via his popular book
"One-Dimensional Man" (1964). Other famous Jews who led the 1960s
hippie movement included Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin and Paul Krassner.
Lesser Jews drove the counterculture movement behind-the-scenes by
publishing, writing for or editing leftist newspapers and magazines.
Anti-war and college activism groups were disproportionately filled
with Jews, for example Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), whose
top leaders were Jewish, e.g. Todd Gitlin, Mike Spiegel, Al Haber, and
Mike Klonsky.
Most of the leaders of the feminist movement were Jews as well, for
example Betty Friedan, Letty Cottin Pogrebin, Lucy Komisar and Gloria
Steinem. Most of the leaders of the homosexual-rights movement have
been Jewish, too, such as Larry Kramer, Alan Klein and Arnie
Kantrowitz. Gun-control actions in the U.S. Congress have also been
dominated by Jews, such as Charles Schumer, Diane Feinstein and Howard
Metzenbaum. Jews created two landmark anti-gun laws in the 1990s: the
Brady law, which came from Howard Metzenbaum and Charles Schumer, and
the assault-rifle-ban law, which came from Dianne Feinstein and
Schumer. In fact, America's first significant anti-gun legislation,
the Gun Control Act of 1968, came from Congressman Emanuel Celler's
House bill H.R. 17735.
Even the famous Woodstock rock-and-roll concert in 1969 - which was a
noteworthy counterculture event - was created by Jews: Michael Lang,
Artie Kornfeld, Joel Rosenman and John Roberts.
Jews guided almost every step of the American counterculture movement.
THE GROWTH OF HOLLYWOOD/THE U.S. MEDIA
Of major importance to America's culture is that the Hollywood film
community and the American media as well are dominated by Jews.
Indeed, Jews founded the major Hollywood movie studios, e.g. Carl
Laemmle (Universal Pictures), William Fox (Fox Film Corp.), Louis B.
Mayer (Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer) and Adolph Zukor (Paramount Pictures).
Some of the more well-known Jews in modern Hollywood and the media
include film directors Steven Spielberg and Woody Allen, the Disney
Co.'s Michael Eisner, actors Dustin Hoffman and Kirk Douglas,
comedians Milton Berle and Don Rickles and news journalists Mike
Wallace, Barbara Walters and Ted Koppel (more information about Jews,
Hollywood and the media can be found in the essay "Who Rules America?"
by National Vanguard Books, available on the web or in their book
catalogue).
As the 1960s hippie revolution was occurring, another revolution of
sorts was happening in Hollywood. Jewish network executives began to
churn out movies and TV shows featuring Black actors in leading roles.
Hollywood also produced a notorious movie - starring well-known actors
- that featured an interracial relationship. It seemed that the Jews
in Hollywood, believing that the pro-White attitudes of America's
Founders would never return, became much bolder during the 1960s.
(Regarding America's Founders, a law created in the Founders' era,
'Act of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat 103-104),' stated that only Whites
could become American citizens. In fact, non-Whites had no significant
rights in America until the XV Amendment was created in 1870).
As America entered the 1970s it became common for Americans to see
Blacks, Jews and even Asians in prominent vocations on TV shows and in
movies. Those minorities were now seen portraying judges, police
detectives and attorneys across large and small screens all over the
U.S.
Non-Hollywood media also flourished in America from the 1960s onward.
The news departments at most broadcasting companies were run by, or
heavily staffed by, Jews. Major U.S. newspapers also came under Jewish
control as small newspapers were bought out by big media conglomerates
which were dominated by Jews. Furthermore, as American culture was
being socially 'Jewified,' so were the cultures of other Western
countries being similarly Jewified via American movies and TV shows,
which became popular in many countries. America served as a base of
sorts for the exporting of Jewish-created movies and TV shows which
featured leftist and politically-correct messages, which served
various Jewish social objectives...
SUMMARY
The information above shows that the impact that Jews have had upon
the world and especially upon the West since 1776 is remarkable.
Important questions arise from the impact of the Jews: without their
actions, would WWII have occurred? Would America have had a 50-year
Cold War with the Soviet Union? Would the Soviet Union have even
existed in the first place? Would the Vietnam War have occurred? Would
America be as politically liberal as it is today? Those are questions
for Westerners to ponder at length.
Even more remarkable is how the Western public never hears about the
influence of the Jews upon their cultures. Words such as 'leftist'..
in the West but never the word 'Jew.' We suggest that the lack of
mention of the Jews in Western societies is itself mute testimony to
the tremendous power of the Jews. By using a) frequent mentions of the
Holocaust; b) the media; c) Hollywood; d) large amounts of money; and
e) significant political influence, Jews have rebuilt the West to
their ends. Gentiles who complain about that Jewish rebuilding - and
their own dispossession as a result - are labeled 'anti-Semitic' and
marginalized into ineffectiveness. Such Jewish behavior as outlined
above is, again, not a plot by Jews but is instead inborn, proactive
behavior which supposedly helps to offset the chance that Jews will be
oppressed again, or be expelled from Western countries (Jews have been
expelled from most Western countries at one time or another)...."
LIGHT FOR NATIONS:
A Short History of the Jews in the Modern World
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
B J Foster
Uno Hu
B J Foster <bjfo...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:j0q46g$anr$1...@bjf.motzarella.org
> .
How to handle Islamic supremacists with Western citizenship?
Simple.. don't give them citizenhip in the fist place.
(traitors did that)
Same goes for mexicans, african.. whatever.
We've got to many people in this country as it stands.
The environment is turning to shit.
B J Foster
Why don't you improve the environment - emigrate!
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
fyf...@gmail.com
Jai Maharaj) wrote:
> How to handle Islamic supremacists with Western citizenship
>
>
> Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
> Om Shanti
Forget it! None of the proposed is going to materialize. It is
unreal, abstract, difficult to be passed as laws and difficult so
enforce.
Learn to do things the Chinese way: assimilate them. If they refused
to be assimilated, it would be OK as long as they don't break the
law. It is the law that we care, not whether the Islamic women put on
veils.
For example, the muslims in Ughur and the Tibetans in Tibet also
demonstrate the tendency to refuse to be assimilated into the
commercial culture of the Hans. So the Tibetans are left free to do
meditation all day long as long as they don't lean on government
subsidy for their religious practices. They then are forced to get a
job either as a tourist guide or waiting on tables. If they make
trouble, they would be punishable by law, and the only people who
would sympathize with them are the breeding hearts or flower kids in
the west.
Saracene
>
> The American political Left was built largely by Jews. For example,
> Jewish Frankfurt School icon Herbert Marcuse laid the foundation for
> the American 'hippie' counterculture via his popular book
> "One-Dimensional Man" (1964).
That Is not historically accurate. Few people had heard of Marcuse
until the French students got hold of him in 1968. Hippies got going
in 1966 in the US, and the main influences were Timothy Leary and Ken
Kesey, neither of whom were Jewish.
> Other famous Jews who led the 1960s
> hippie movement included Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin and Paul Krassner.
They were 'yippies' not strictly hippies.
>
> Lesser Jews drove the counterculture movement behind-the-scenes by
> publishing, writing for or editing leftist newspapers and magazines.
> Anti-war and college activism groups were disproportionately filled
> with Jews, for example Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), whose
> top leaders were Jewish, e.g. Todd Gitlin, Mike Spiegel, Al Haber, and
> Mike Klonsky.
>
>
> Even the famous Woodstock rock-and-roll concert in 1969 - which was a
> noteworthy counterculture event - was created by Jews: Michael Lang,
> Artie Kornfeld, Joel Rosenman and John Roberts.
> Jews guided almost every step of the American counterculture movement.
Jews would be presumably have a presence in the commercialisation of
any popular movement. That is not to say that they invented it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_hippie_movement
>
Topaz
The West is the White race.
The goal of America is to destroy the White race. The
multi-culture and pluralism they push is only at the expense of
Whites. No one is trying to push multi-culture in China or Japan or
anyplace but on the Whites. And they promote racial intermarriage.
If things continue as they are the White race is doomed.
And who is doing all of this? It is the USA government and the
media, in other words the Jews.
Many Whites are traitors. They support the USA government and their
own destruction. We should look for allies. And anyone who wants to
remove the Jews from power is our ally. In the past the Japanese were
our allies. Today it is the Muslims.
Osama bin Laden
September 24th statement published in Pakistan
"I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We
are against the system, which makes other nations slaves of the United
States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic
freedom. This system is totally in control of the American Jews, whose
first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is simply that the
American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced
to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the
punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it
is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the
U.S. is not uttering a single word."
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
Topaz
Tiptoeing around Our Problems
By Dr. William Pierce
"We've been talking about the very dangerous situation in the Middle
East recently, just because so much is happening there, and
undoubtedly we'll be talking about it much more in the future. For
that reason I want to make very clear what my motives and sympathies
are, lest I lead anyone astray and be thought a hypocrite for doing
so. First, regarding Palestine: although my sympathies definitely lie
with the Palestinians rather than with the Jews, it is not horror at
what the Jews are doing to the Palestinians that motivates me. What
motivates me is horror that my country is being used by the Jews in
their war against the Palestinians. If America were not involved at
all in the Middle East I still would sympathize with the Palestinians
and I would wish that they could be successful in driving the Jews
into the sea and annihilating the abomination that is Israel, but that
conflict between Jews and Palestinians would not be a major concern
for me. At least, my
concern there would be dwarfed by my concern for problems more
directly involving my own people in America and in Europe and in
southern Africa.
Even now, with money and weapons being supplied by America and used to
slaughter Palestinians, my concern is much less with monsters like
Ariel Sharon who are doing the slaughtering than it is with the filthy
creatures among my own people in America who are collaborating with
Jews here to keep the weapons and money flowing to Sharon -- and are
ready to do whatever else the Jews require of them here or abroad.
So when I tell you about Jews in occupied Palestine shooting
Palestinian children, and disapproval and anger are evident in my
voice, what I really am angry about is that the American people, my
people, are being used for this murderous activity. I am angry that
America's whole foreign policy has been perverted to serve Jewish
interests at the expense of American interests. I am angry that
America's political system has been perverted to ensure that we always
have so-called "leaders," whether Democrat or Republican, who are
dependent on the Jewish media or Jewish money or both for their
election and consequently will do the bidding of the Jews. I am angry
that our whole government is riddled with Jews -- Jews in our Defense
Department, Jews in our State
Department, Jews in our Immigration and Naturalization Service, Jews
in our Justice Department, Jews in the President's speech-writing
staff - who really set the policies of our government behind the
scenes, while the politicians are out front in the spotlight making
speeches and kissing babies - and doing as they're told by the Jews
behind the
scenes.
Did you know that it was a Jewish speechwriter, David Frum, who put
the phrase "axis of evil" in George Bush's mouth to justify America's
ongoing war against Israel's enemies? Did you know that a clique of
Jews in the Defense Department and among George Bush's foreign policy
advisers are the people actually running the so-called "war on terror"
in Afghanistan: a war that they intend to expand to Iraq and any other
Middle Eastern country that gets uppity, in order to make that part of
the world safe for Israel at American expense? Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld is a front man for his nominal subordinates, Deputy
Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz and Deputy Undersecretary of
Defense for Policy Douglas Feith; and George Bush's official foreign
policy adviser, Condoleezza Rice, helps him meet his Black quota for
the Cabinet, but it is the Jew Richard Perle, chairman of Bush's
Defense Policy Board, who gives him his foreign policy directives.
As I've said on more than one occasion, George Bush is a feckless
nincompoop who couldn't come up with a defense policy or a foreign
policy on his own if he had to -- which is why he's President. The
real policymakers behind the scenes certainly don't want a man in the
White House who has ideas of his own, because those ideas might
conflict with theirs.
And it is nothing but empty sophistry to make a distinction between
Jews in Israel, such as Ariel Sharon and Simon Peres, and the Jews in
Mr. Bush's administration formulating his policies or the Jews
controlling our mass media. They all are Jews, and that's what really
matters.
There are many knowledgeable Americans besides me who think that it's
not a good thing to have Jews using America to advance Israel's
interests at the expense of America's interests. They know how the
system works: how the Jews exert their control through money and media
and a well-entrenched network of Jewish operatives, such as Wolfowitz
and Feith and Perle. And many of these knowledgeable Americans also
understand how Jewish subterfuge and deceit work: they understand that
the Jews throw up a lot of smoke to conceal their control and make it
appear that they have much less influence than they actually do.
Despite this degree of understanding that many knowledgeable Americans
have, there seem to be very few who are willing or able to draw the
necessary conclusions. What I keep seeing are comments about the need
to get the so-called "peace process" going again in the Middle East,
and how there are hardline supporters of Israel who are obstructing
the "peace process" because they think that it will give too much to
the Palestinians or will compromise Israel's security, or whatever.
These knowledgeable Americans seem to believe that if we could just
get around the Jewish hardliners somehow -- if we could just
neutralize Jews such as Wolfowitz and Feith and Perle; if Ariel Sharon
could be replaced by a "moderate" Jewish prime minister -- then the
"peace process" could proceed, America could gradually reduce its
involvement in helping the Jews keep the Palestinians repressed, and
eventually Israel no longer would be using America, and everything
would be rosy. And so these knowledgeable Americans expend all of
their wit and energy in these trivial pursuits.
Listen! Do you know what the most hopeful aspect of the conflict
between Jews and Palestinians is now? It is the ongoing radicalization
of the Muslim masses throughout the whole Middle East. The
collaborator governments in Pakistan, in Egypt, in Saudi Arabia are
terrified of the reaction they see among their own people to what
Ariel Sharon is doing to the Palestinians. When Sharon's Jewish troops
shoot Palestinian children, Muslim mobs riot, and governments that now
collaborate with the United States quake. Ariel Sharon is the best
thing that has happened in the Middle East in the last 54 years.
The Palestinian tactic of suicide bombing is being denounced by every
politician and every media spokesman over here now. It's nothing but
terrorism, they all say. There's no justification at all for suicide
bombing, they tell us. Of course, whenever you hear that sort of
unanimity from the politicians and the media people you should be
suspicious. In fact, suicide bombing is the best tactic for the
Palestinians to use now, because it provokes the Jews to step up
reprisals. And the reprisals radicalize the masses in every country in
the Middle East. If just one of the collaborator governments falls,
the spines of all the rest will be stiffened, and the Bush government
will be far less likely to find collaborators for building its
so-called "coalition" to do the will of the Jews in the Middle East.
Suicide bombers now hardly put a dent in the population of five
million Jews in occupied Palestine, and Sharon's bloody reprisals
hardly put a dent in the overall Palestinian population. But if
conflict of this sort continues until just one collaborator government
is overthrown, that ultimately will be worth more than ten thousand
successful suicide
bombings in which only 20 or so Jews are killed each time. In the long
run there can be no real peace in the Middle East and no end to
America's shameful role there -- and no future for the Palestinian
people -- as long as there is an Israel. There seems to be a better
understanding of these things among knowledgeable Palestinians than
among knowledgeable Americans.
Shallow thinking and the pursuit of trivial goals is even worse among
knowledgeable Americans when it comes to domestic problems. They
really do not want to grasp these problems with both hands and deal
with them in a forthright way. Look, for example, at what uncontrolled
immigration has done and is doing to America. And what do
knowledgeable Americans propose to do about that? Very little, really.
They make much of the fact that several of the al-Qaeda hijackers who
carried out the September 11 attack were in the United States only
because of very lax immigration policies, and so that's a good reason
for tightening up the policies.
How about simply rounding up all illegal aliens immediately -- all 12
million of them -- and booting them and all of their offspring out of
the country without further ado?
Oh, no, no, no! We can't do that! Why not? Well, the media never would
stand for it. The media would be all over anyone who even proposed a
mass expulsion of illegal aliens. They would denounce any political
leader who tried to do that as a "racist" and a "neo-Nazi." And so
knowledgeable Americans, who understand the immigration disaster quite
well, continue tiptoeing around it, afraid to do or even say anything
really significant about it: terrified even to think about really
radical solutions that might actually end the problem. And it's the
same with the rest of our domestic problems. Lots of people understand
these problems and are worried about them, but they won't tackle them
in any
significant way. They let the Jews -- the Jewish media and Jewish
money and the entrenched Jewish network -- have their way, for all
practical purposes.
Why? Why are the Jews permitted to get away with all of their
destructive policies and activities without being challenged or
opposed in any significant way? Part of the reason is that the Jews
are very powerful, and therefore many people are afraid to cross them.
They're afraid of the sort of media reaction I just mentioned in
connection with immigration. Everyone understands that the Jews stick
together and will viciously attack anyone who opposes them. It's the
old story, so aptly expressed by the late-16th-century writer, Sir
John Harington. Harington wrote: "Treason doth never prosper: what's
the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." Today the
Jewish power structure is
prospering, and none dare oppose it or even call it what it is. Well,
that's only part of the reason Jews are permitted to get away with so
much. There's more to it than that. There's a mystique the Jews have
built very carefully around themselves and nurtured diligently. It is
a mystique of piety and injured innocence. It is a mystique that says
to the Gentile world: "We are a gentle and inoffensive race, and
because of this everyone hates us. We're smart and we work hard and
achieve success, and because of this everyone hates us. We are a
highly moral and ethical race, and because of this everyone hates us.
We are a very talented race, with many gifted members, many geniuses,
and because of this everyone hates us. We are a very altruistic race,
a race of philanthropists who only want to make a better world for
everyone, and because of this everyone hates us."
Many simpletons among the lemmings simply accept these claims at face
value. Many knowledgeable people, however, who can see through these
claims to the real Jews hiding behind them, still hesitate to
challenge them. Part of the Jewish mystique is the so-called
"Holocaust." In its most simpleminded form the "Holocaust" story is
the claim that the
Germans hated the Jews for the reasons I just mentioned -- for their
gentleness and their success and their morality and their talent and
their altruism -- and because of this hatred roasted six million of
them during the Second World War in "gas ovens," to use one of the
Jews' favorite "Holocaust" phrases.
Actually, the "Holocaust" is a very powerful part of the Jewish
mystique. The Jews crafted the "Holocaust" story with great care and
great effort -- well, actually not with as much care as they might
have used: it's as full of holes as a Swiss cheese, but still it is
sufficient to make most people, even those who understand what Jews
are really like, hesitate to attack them. People don't want to be seen
as bullies. They don't want to be seen as so insensitive that they
would criticize the Jews, who already have suffered so much, poor
dears, at the hands of anti-Semites.
In several past broadcasts we've looked at a number of the lies and
exaggerations and distortions that make up the "Holocaust" story.
There are a number of good books available on the subject from the
sponsor of this broadcast, National Vanguard Books, including Norman
Finklestein's excellent book The Holocaust Industry, which I discussed
in an earlier broadcast. The point is that despite the lies, despite
the fact that many knowledgeable Americans are aware of the lies, the
"Holocaust" still serves its purpose for the Jews. People are afraid
of the image conjured up by the "Holocaust."
Perhaps it's that American life is too soft... Whatever the reason,
many otherwise knowledgeable and hardheaded Americans just can't
entertain the idea of rounding up the Jews and getting rid of them,
even when the situation is as urgent as it is in America today. And
really, in the long run that is the only way to solve the Jewish
problem.
The Germans understood that, back in the 1930s, and they had the
courage and the foresight to act on their understanding. Unlike
Americans today, they had an honest government concerned above all
with the survival, welfare, and progress of the German people, and
they began doing what was necessary, forcing the Jews to emigrate
wholesale from Germany beginning in 1933. And because of that the
Jewish propaganda machine has attacked the Germans so viciously, has
so blackened and demonized their image, that today even knowledgeable
people are afraid to be associated with that image. They are afraid to
say that the Germans were right, that the Germans were justified, and
that we need to do the same if we are to survive. So, as I said, the
"Holocaust" story, despite its
glaring discrepancies and lies, still serves as a shield for the Jews;
it still protects them from criticism.
Well, mostly. In parts of Europe not quite as poisoned by Jewish
propaganda as America is, the shield has slipped a bit. A large
British department store chain, Selfridges, has yielded to demands
from anti-Israel demonstrators and has removed from its shelves
products marked "Made in Israel." Last week the second largest
supermarket chain in Norway, Coop Norge -- which is to say, Norway
Coop, announced its decision to boycott all Israeli imports. That
decision was not the result of pressure from anti-Israel demonstrators
but was based on the feeling by Coop Norge management that it would be
immoral to continue supporting the Israeli economy by selling Israeli
imports under the
present circumstances. That is a step forward, though it is a long way
from what is needed.
The Jews, of course, immediately began waving their "Holocaust" story
around, and now, as the boycott movement catches hold in Scandinavia,
they are trying to portray themselves as injured innocents being
attacked once more by "anti-Semites." They are comparing the growing
Scandinavian boycott of Israeli products to the German boycott of
Jewish merchants in the late 1930s. Certainly, a boycott of Israeli
products is a good thing, and the fact that such a boycott is even
thinkable by big businessmen today is a sign that the Jewish mystique
-- and in particular the Jewish "Holocaust" story -- is becoming a bit
shopworn. It no longer has the hypnotic power that it once had -- at
least, in some parts of the world. And I suppose that we should be
happy about that. The unfortunate fact remains, however, that in
America the Jews still have their money and
their media and their entrenched network of bureaucrats, and even if
the "Holocaust" story has lost some of its charm in Europe, it still
keeps most knowledgeable Americans intimidated.
Knowledge isn't enough. Courage and boldness also are necessary.
Honesty and forthrightness are necessary also. Tiptoeing around the
critical issues of our time isn't enough. Tiny reforms in our
disastrous foreign policy and in our disastrous immigration policy and
in a dozen other disastrous policies aren't enough. We need to stop
apologizing to the people who are destroying us and go full bore at
destroying them instead.
Instead of being hypnotized by the "Holocaust" story we need to look
with clear eyes at why there was a need for action against the Jews in
Germany in the 1930s and 1940s. The Jews' claim today that the Germans
were suffering from collective insanity and had no reason for trying
to get the Jews off their backs is as phony as George Bush's claim
that
Osama bin Laden had no reason for attacking America on September 11.
Wherever Jews go they corrupt and destroy. That is their nature,
always and everywhere. Let us be thankful to the Palestinians who now
are making such terrible sacrifices to help the world see what the
Jews are like. And I suppose we also should be thankful to Ariel
Sharon for demonstrating so forthrightly to the world what Jews are
like.
Let us hope that the conflict between Jews and Palestinians
intensifies and lasts long enough to wake up many more of our people
around the world and fill them with disgust at America's continuing
support for the Jews. Let us hope that it lasts long enough to bring
about the overthrow of every collaborationist regime in the Muslim
world. Let us hope that it brings about an airtight oil embargo
against the United States and shuts off the lights in every shopping
mall and every sports stadium in America long enough for the lemmings
to become restless and begin asking questions. Let us hope that it
makes the efforts of every fool and every traitor who is striving for
a resumption of the so-called "peace process" so obviously futile that
these efforts no longer have the power to deceive anyone.
Ultimately, of course, we must not depend on the Palestinian suicide
bombers or on Ariel Sharon's murder squads to do for us what we should
be doing for ourselves. Ultimately we must stop tiptoeing and begin
marching boldly and forthrightly toward solving our own problems."
Topaz
<john...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jul 27, 5:52�pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>
>> The American political Left was built largely by Jews. For example,
>> Jewish Frankfurt School icon Herbert Marcuse laid the foundation for
>> the American 'hippie' counterculture via his popular book
>> "One-Dimensional Man" (1964).
>
>That Is not historically accurate. Few people had heard of Marcuse
>until the French students got hold of him in 1968. Hippies got going
>in 1966 in the US, and the main influences were Timothy Leary and Ken
>Kesey, neither of whom were Jewish.
Those people just liked drugs. What does that have to do with
affirmative action and the rest of the left wing agenda? If as you
say, Marcuse didn't start the hippie movement, he certainly latched on
to it, and gave it a leftist ideology.
>
>> Other famous Jews who led the 1960s
>> hippie movement included Abbie Hoffman, Jerry Rubin and Paul Krassner.
>
>They were 'yippies' not strictly hippies.
>
>>
>> Lesser Jews drove the counterculture movement behind-the-scenes by
>> publishing, writing for or editing leftist newspapers and magazines.
>> Anti-war and college activism groups were disproportionately filled
>> with Jews, for example Students for a Democratic Society (SDS), whose
>> top leaders were Jewish, e.g. Todd Gitlin, Mike Spiegel, Al Haber, and
>> Mike Klonsky.
>>
>>
>> Even the famous Woodstock rock-and-roll concert in 1969 - which was a
>> noteworthy counterculture event - was created by Jews: Michael Lang,
>> Artie Kornfeld, Joel Rosenman and John Roberts.
>> Jews guided almost every step of the American counterculture movement.
>
>Jews would be presumably have a presence in the commercialisation of
>any popular movement. That is not to say that they invented it.
OK well said, but they latch on to movements and are quick to put
their twist on it.
B J Foster
>
> The West is the White race.
Aw, the Witless Wanker is back!
Here we go again...
>
> The goal of America is to destroy...
> Osama bin Laden
Alreddy dunnit, moron
>
>
> http://www.idoot.org/ http://www.notsane.com http://www.nsm33.org
>
> http://heretica1.com/ http://immigration-globa1ization.blogspot.com/
Michael Ejercito
> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 14:51:31 -0700 (PDT), Saracene
>
Michael
Topaz
Topaz
They already did. They say the fight is over "democracy", instead of
the real issue, which is that some of the leaders over there kiss up
to the Jews, and their puppet country the USA.
Democracy is a cruel joke when the Jews control the media.
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation
with the average voter."
Winston Churchill
"Jewry rules from behind the mask of democracy. What one calls
democracy today is concealed Jewish domination. Jews determine what
happens in the democratic states"
Julius Streicher, Der St�rmer, #34/1939.
"A couple of weeks ago I quoted a few sentences from a book published
in 1928 titled Propaganda, by ... Edward Bernays. Today I'll read to
you an expanded set of excerpts from Bernays' book to give you a
little more of the gist of his message. I quote:
"The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits
and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic
society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society
constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of
our country.
"We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes are formed, our
ideas suggested largely by men we have never heard of. This is a
logical result of the way in which our democratic society is
organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner
if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. . . .
"Whatever attitude one chooses to take toward this condition, it
remains a fact that in almost every act of our daily lives, whether in
the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our
ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of
persons . . . who understand the mental processes and social patterns
of the masses.
It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind, who
harness old social forces and contrive new ways to bind and guide the
world. . .
"No serious sociologist believes any longer that the voice of the
people expresses any divine or especially wise and lofty idea. The
voice of the people expresses the mind of the people, and that mind is
made up for it by the group leaders in whom it believes and by those
persons who understand the manipulation of public opinion. . . .
"Whether in the problem of getting elected to office or in the problem
of interpreting and popularizing new issues, or in the problem of
making the day-to-day administration of public affairs a vital part of
the community life, the use of propaganda, carefully adjusted to the
mentality of the masses, is an essential adjunct of political life." -
end of quote -
I should mention that Bernays' book is not profound or especially
valuable in itself. It merely states a few self-evident facts about
the way in which a modern society works. For the person interested in
propaganda, far more useful books are available. The fact that Bernays
was a Jew is not even especially relevant here except to emphasize
that propaganda, the mass media, psychology, and the manipulation of
others always have been subjects of special interest to the Jews. It
is not for nothing that they are as thick in these fields today as
they were in the time of Bernays and Freud. The reason I chose
Bernays' book to quote is that it provides a more concise and clear
summary, in a few quotable paragraphs, of the role of propaganda in
modern life than most other
books on the subject.
If I were you I wouldn't even waste time trying to hunt down a copy of
Bernays' book. All it does is state the obvious: namely, that the
whole concept of democracy is meaningless in an age where a few people
have in their hands the mechanism for controlling the attitudes and
opinions of a majority of the electorate. And Bernays also takes the
disingenuous position that not only is this control a fact of life,
but it is a good thing; it is necessary to control and regiment the
thinking of the public in order to avoid chaos, and it can only lead
us to greater progress and prosperity. He simply glosses over the
question of
who should exercise this control and what their motives should be.
If you really want to study the subject of propaganda, a good place to
start is with the 1962 book, also titled Propaganda, by the Frenchman
Jacques Ellul. That book is still in print and is available from the
sponsor of this program, National Vanguard Books. Professor Ellul
deals with the subject in much greater depth and with much greater
honesty than Bernays does, but he agrees with Bernays on the most
obvious and
fundamental conclusions: on the irrelevance of the idea of democracy,
for example. I quote from Professor Ellul's book:
"If I am in favor of democracy, I can only regret that propaganda
renders the true exercise of it almost impossible. But I think that it
would be even worse to entertain any illusions about a coexistence of
true democracy and propaganda." -- end of quote --
To me it is frustrating that a conclusion that seems so obvious is
nevertheless resisted by so many otherwise intelligent people.
Democracy has become almost a sacred concept to them, this idea that
the policies guiding our nation should be decided by counting the
votes of every featherless biped who has reached the age of 18. It's
like motherhood:
they're almost afraid to question it.
This seems to be as true of intellectuals in our society as it is of
Joe Sixpacks. The fact is that intellectuals are no more likely to be
independent-minded than people who work with their hands; most
intellectuals, just like most Joe Sixpacks, are lemmings. In fact, as
Ellul points out, it is precisely the intellectuals who are most
strongly controlled by propaganda, because they are more open to every
medium of propaganda.
And I must admit that it took me a long time to overcome the ideas
drummed into me when I was in school that under a democracy people are
more free than under any other political system, that under a
democracy we are all free to think and say whatever we want, and that
we have a greater responsibility as citizens of a democracy to make up
our own minds about things independently, and so on. Actually, we
still have some degree of individual freedom in the United States
today because more than 200 years ago men whose temperament was far
more aristocratic than democratic in the modern sense of the word were
willing to go to war against their legitimate government in order to
secure that freedom for us, and people with a truly democratic
temperament, who have been
gnawing away at that freedom ever since, haven't yet succeeded in
suppressing it completely.
Well, it should not be surprising to us that although books such as
Professor Ellul's Propaganda - and many others - are readily
available, almost no one has heard of them. Keeping the public
believing in the myth of democracy is an important element in
maintaining control over the thinking and behavior of the public. It
is simply immoral and
scandalous to question the reality of democracy. It's like questioning
the truth of the "Holocaust" story. And for that reason we're not
likely to be taught in our social studies classes in school or to read
in the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal even the most obvious
and self-evident conclusions presented by Bernays or Ellul. We're
still
taught how democracy safeguards our freedom, even while those who
control the mechanism of propaganda in our democratic society are
working day and night to eliminate that freedom."
B J Foster
> '
(The usual spam)
>
>
> http://www.i4r.org/ http://www.na4van.com http://www.nsm33.org
>
> http://heretica1.com/ http://immigration-globa1ization.b1ogspot.com/
B J Foster
> "Jewry rules from behind the mask of democracy. What one calls
> democracy today is concealed Jewish domination. Jews determine what
> happens in the democratic states"
> Julius Streicher, Der St�rmer, #34/1939.
'Jew' is the nazi word for 'I wish I could be smarter'.
Did you know that Jews, who comprise only 0.2% of the world's
population, are responsible for 30% of the non-political Nobel prizes?
If you're a Nazi, it's quite likely that you owe your life to a Jewish
medical invention. Oh the irony!
saracene
>
> Those people just liked drugs. What does that have to do with
> affirmative action and the rest of the left wing agenda?
Not much. Hippyism originally was not particularly left wing. It was a
form of bohemianism, as traditionally practiced by artists etc,
popularised into youth revolt. That American puritans should see it as
a communist plot is hardly surprising, leftists were also shocked, the
New Statesman writing of 'American anti-socialist beatnikery'.
Of course Marxists jumped on the bandwagon in the pursuit of their
eternal agenda.
> If as you
> say, Marcuse didn't start the hippie movement, he certainly latched on
> to it, and gave it a leftist ideology.
>
>
By 1968 French youth were a bit backward as far as the counterculture
was concerned. When they caught on they overintellectualised as is
their way, linking up with the Marx and Freud they were taught in the
universities and raved about Marcuse's book for a while.
Topaz
<bjfo...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
>'Jew' is the nazi word for 'I wish I could be smarter'.
>
>Did you know that Jews, who comprise only 0.2% of the world's
>population, are responsible for 30% of the non-political Nobel prizes?
Jews give out the prizes and it is a disgrace to get one. For example
"Brokeback Mountain" won a movie prize.
>
>If you're a Nazi, it's quite likely that you owe your life to a Jewish
>medical invention. Oh the irony!
It is said that the Jews, at least the Ashkenazi Jews, have a
higher average IQ than Whites, at least Whites as loosely defined
by the designers of the IQ tests. [ <http://tinyurl.com/ihhe> ]
According to Professor Richard Lynn, writing in Personality and
Individual Differences on April 2d, 2003, the average verbal IQ
of American Jews is about 108, which, some people argue, might
explain the disproportionate number of Jews in certain positions.
[ <http://tinyurl.com/ihif> ] For example, although Jews are only
about 2 to 3% of the U.S. population, they constitute 23% of the
wealthiest Americans, 30% of the faculty at "elite" universities,
11% of Nobel Physics prizes, 60% of Yale graduate students, 60%
of "top Hollywood positions" (according to 60 Minutes), and 76%
of "most influential intellectuals" (according to Alan
Dershowitz).
It's in verbal IQ-not mathematical or visuospatial ability --
that Jews excel, and, when you consider that the fast-talking,
quick-thinking sharpster or con man is almost a Jewish
stereotype, then common experience confirms the data. [
<http://tinyurl.com/ihje> ] This would mean that the Jewish
advantage would show itself mainly in areas like law, politics,
journalism, media, advertising, public relations, and other
fields in which verbal skills, persuasion, word-weaving, or
illusion-weaving are especially valuable. And that's what the
statistics indicate. Though Jews are overrepresented in physics
and math, they are far more overrepresented in Hollywood and law.
This is another case where our day-to-day experience perfectly
matches the science, and is essentially undeniable.
Some have argued that Jewish families are far more concerned than
White families
about the academic and professional success of their offspring,
and concentrate far more of their time and energy and money on
making sure that their children succeed in school and go on to
the best careers possible. Others point out that Jews have a far
higher degree of group consciousness-of racial identity --
than Whites, and that this intense ethnic identity makes Jews
willing and eager to put their group interests above other
interests, even individual economic interests. Thus Jews are more
willing to help their fellow Jews because they are Jews (which
experience tells us they do in so many different ways that it
boggles the mind) than Whites are willing to help their fellow
Whites because they are Whites (which happens far too seldom, and
which is socially unacceptable anyway-even illegal-in the
insane social and "moral" system which crafty Jews and decadent
Whites have imposed on us). So Jews will preferentially hire
other Jews; Jews will openly organize themselves to advance
Jewish interests; Jews will portray Jews as sympathetic
characters in their entertainment media; Jews will show Jewish
interests as morally right in their news media; and, most
importantly in my view, Jews will demonize any who oppose Jewish
interests or who promote White interests. All of these things
have an effect on the Jewish success rate in various fields, and
the last mentioned has a profound effect in making many Gentiles,
many Whites, act to promote Jewish success and Jewish interests
and also makes them, in many cases, act against their own
individual interests and their own racial interests. In fact,
Jewish influence has been paramount in constructing the 'liberal'
moral paradigm of the 20th century, which in effect says that
acting in the interest of White people and doing anything which
tends to support our continued existence in the world-whether
opposing racial mixing or working for an exclusive living space
for Whites-is "racism" and of course "racism" is the ultimate
in evil according to this Jewish-created "morality...
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
and/or www.mantra.com/jai
fanabba <fan...@aol.com> posted:
>
> Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
>
> >
> > http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/07/how-to-handle-islamic-supremacists-...
>
Yes they are! A comment from the web page:
By Jaladhi
July 20, 2011
These morons continually show that they will never integrate with the
West nor will show any respect for our laws or for any other
religion. They need to be sent back to their Islamic hell holes now.
Period.
We are being delusional if we think Muslims are here to live like any
other normal human being and their repatriation to their motherlands
is in order. Besides this, Islam has to be banned in all non-Muslim
lands where they have invaded forcefully own their own or peacefully
with the complicity of Western leaders.
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/07/how-to-handle-islamic-supremacists-with-western-citizenship.html
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
B J Foster
>> If you're a Nazi, it's quite likely that you owe your life to a Jewish
>> >medical invention. Oh the irony!
>
> It is said that the Jews, at least the Ashkenazi Jews, have a
> higher average IQ than Whites, at least Whites as loosely defined
> by the designers of the IQ tests.
The origins of the Ashkenazi Jews have been linked back to the Hasidic
Jews and ancient Israel.
You're a pathetic liar - the designers of the IQ tests never defined
'Whites' loosely or otherwise.
You ought to pay attention to the Jews, what they have achieved as a
community and how they have achieved it in a positive way - by building,
creating, inventing and improving society.
Unlike white trash like you - that preaches jealousy and hate.
Topaz
Dr Joseph Goebbels, Der Angriff, 21 January 1929.
The Jew
by Joseph Goebbels
Everything is discussed openly in Germany, and every German claims the
right to have an opinion on any and all questions. One is Catholic,
the other Protestant, one an employee, the other an employer, a
capitalist, a socialist, a democrat, an aristocrat. There is nothing
dishonorable about choosing one side or the other of a question.
Discussions happen in public, and where matters are unclear or
confused one settles it by argument and counter argument. But there is
one problem that is not discussed publicly, one that it is delicate
even to mention: the Jewish question. It is taboo in our republic.
The Jew is immunized against all dangers: one may call him a
scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like
water off a raincoat. But call him a Jew and you will be astonished at
how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I've
been found out."
One cannot defend himself against the Jew. He attacks with lightening
speed from his position of safety and uses his abilities to crush any
attempt at defense.
Quickly he turns the attacker's charges back on him, and the attacker
becomes the liar, the troublemaker, the terrorist. Nothing could be
more mistaken than to defend oneself. That is just what the Jew wants.
He can invent a new lie every day for the enemy to respond to, and the
result is that the enemy spends so much time defending himself that he
has no time to do what the Jew really fears: to attack. The accused
has become the accuser, and loudly he shoves the accuser into the
dock. So it always was in the past when a person or a movement fought
the Jew. That is what would happen to us as well were we not fully
aware of his nature, and if we lacked the courage to draw the
following radical conclusions:
1. One cannot fight the Jew by positive means. He is a negative, and
this negative must be erased from the German system, or he will
forever corrupt it.
2. One cannot discuss the Jewish question with the Jews. One can
hardly prove to a person that one has the duty to render him harmless.
3. One cannot allow the Jew the same means one would give an honest
opponent, for he is no honorable opponent. He will use generosity and
nobility only to trap his enemy.
4. The Jew has nothing to say about German questions. He is a
foreigner, an alien, who only enjoys the rights of a guest, rights
that he always abuses.
5. The so-called religious morality of the Jews is no morality at all,
rather an encouragement to betrayal. Therefore, they have no claim to
protection from the state.
6. The Jew is not smarter than we are, rather only cleverer and
craftier. His system cannot be defeated economically-he follows
entirely different moral principles than we do. It can only be broken
through political means.
7. A Jew cannot insult a German. Jewish slanders are but badges of
honor for a German opponent of the Jews.
8. The more a German person or a German movement opposes the Jew, the
more valuable it is. If someone is attacked by the Jews, that is a
sure sign of his virtue. He who is not persecuted by the Jews, or who
is praised by them, is useless and dangerous.
9. The Jew evaluates German questions from the Jewish standpoint. As a
result, the opposite of what he says must be true.
10. One must either affirm or reject anti-Semitism. He who defends the
Jews harms his own people. One can only be a Jewish lackey or a Jewish
opponent. Opposing the Jews is a matter of personal hygiene.
These principles give the anti-Jewish movement a chance of success.
Only such a movement will be taken seriously by the Jews, only such a
movement will be feared by them.
The fact that he shouts and complains about such a movement therefore
is only a sign that it is right. We are therefore delighted that we
are constantly attacked in the Jewish gazettes. They may shout about
terror. We answer with Mussolini's familiar words: "Terror? Never! It
is social hygiene. We take these individuals out of circulation just
as a doctor does to a bacterium.
Topaz
The West is the White race.
The goal of America is to destroy the White race. The
multi-culture and pluralism they push is only at the expense of
Whites. No one is trying to push multi-culture in China or Japan or
anyplace but on the Whites. And they promote racial intermarriage.
If things continue as they are the White race is doomed.
And who is doing all of this? It is the USA government and the
media, in other words the Jews.
Many Whites are traitors. They support the USA government and their
own destruction. We should look for allies. And anyone who wants to
remove the Jews from power is our ally. In the past the Japanese were
our allies. Today it is the Muslims.
Osama bin Laden
September 24th statement published in Pakistan
"I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We
are against the system, which makes other nations slaves of the United
States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic
freedom. This system is totally in control of the American Jews, whose
first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is simply that the
American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced
to live according to the principles and laws laid by them. So, the
punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it
is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the
U.S. is not uttering a single word."
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
Topaz
The Real Cost Of US Support
For Israel - $3 Trillion
By Christopher Bollyn
9-19-3
While it is commonly reported that Israel officially receives some $3
billion every year in the form of economic aid from the U.S.
government, this figure is just the tip of the iceberg. There are many
billions of dollars more in hidden costs and economic losses lurking
beneath the surface. A recently published economic analysis has
concluded that U.S. support for the state of Israel has cost American
taxpayers nearly $3 trillion ($3 million millions) in 2002 dollars.
"The Costs to American Taxpayers of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict:
$3 Trillion" is a summary of economic research done by Thomas R.
Stauffer. Stauffer's summary of the research was published in the
June 2003 issue of The Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.
Stauffer is a Washington, D.C.-based engineer and economist who writes
and teaches about the economics of energy and the Middle East.
Stauffer has taught at Harvard University and Georgetown University's
School of Foreign Service. Stauffer's findings were first presented at
an October 2002 conference sponsored by the U.S. Army College and the
University of Maine.
Stauffer's analysis is "an estimate of the total cost to the U.S.
alone of instability and conflict in the region - which emanates from
the core Israeli-Palestinian conflict."
"Total identifiable costs come to almost $3 trillion," Stauffer says.
"About 60 percent, well over half, of those costs - about $1.7
trillion - arose from the U.S. defense of Israel, where most of that
amount has been incurred since 1973."
"Support for Israel comes to $1.8 trillion, including special trade
advantages, preferential contracts, or aid buried in other accounts.
In addition to the financial outlay, U.S. aid to Israel costs some
275,000 American jobs each year." The trade-aid imbalance alone with
Israel of between $6-10 billion costs about 125,000 American jobs
every year, Stauffer says.
The largest single element in the costs has been the series of
oil-supply crises that have accompanied the Israeli-Arab wars and the
construction of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. �?To date these have
cost the U.S. $1.5 trillion (2002 dollars), excluding the additional
costs incurred since 2001,�? Stauffer wrote.
The cost of supporting Israel increased drastically after the 1973
Israeli-Arab war. U.S. support for Israel during that war resulted in
additional costs for the American taxpayer of between $750 billion and
$1 trillion, Stauffer says.
When Israel was losing the war, President Richard Nixon stepped in to
supply the Jewish state with U.S. weapons. Nixon's intervention
triggered the Arab oil embargo which Stauffer estimates cost the U.S.
as much as $600 billion in lost GDP and another $450 in higher oil
import costs.
"The 1973 oil crisis, all in all, cost the U.S. economy no less than
$900 billion, and probably as much as $1,200 billion," he says.
As a result of the oil embargo the United States created the Strategic
Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to "insulate Israel and the U.S. against the
wielding of a future Arab 'oil weapon'." The billion-barrel SPR has
cost U.S. taxpayers $134 billion to date. According to an Oil Supply
Guarantee, which former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger provided
Israel in 1975, Israel gets 'first call' on any oil available to the
U.S. if Israel's oil supply is stopped.
Stauffer's $3 trillion figure is conservative as it does not include
the increased costs incurred during the year-long buildup to the
recent war against Iraq in which Israel played a significant, albeit
covert, role. The higher oil prices that occurred as a result of the
Anglo-American campaign against Iraq were absorbed by the consumers.
The increase in oil prices provided a huge bonus for the leading oil
companies such as British Petroleum and Shell, who are major oil
producers as well as retailers. The major international oil companies
recorded record profits for the first quarter of 2003.
The Washington Report seeks to "provide the American public with
balanced and accurate information concerning U.S. relations with
Middle Eastern states." The monthly journal is known for keeping close
tabs on the amount of U.S. taxpayer money that goes to Israel and how
much pro-Israel money flows back to Members of Congress in the form of
campaign aid.
The journal's website, www.wrmea.com, has an up-to-date counter at the
top that indicates how much official aid flows to Israel. While the
counter currently stands at $88.2 billion, it only reflects the
minimum, as it does not include the many hidden costs.
"The distinction is important, because the indirect or consequential
losses suffered by the U.S. as a result of its blind support for
Israel exceed by many times the substantial amount of direct aid to
Israel," Shirl McArthur wrote in the May 2003 issue of Washington
Report.
McArthur's article, "A Conservative Tally of Total Direct U.S. Aid to
Israel: $97.5 Billion - and Counting" tallies the hidden costs, such
as interest lost due to the early disbursement of aid to Israel and
funds hidden in other accounts. For example, Israel received $5.45
billion in Defense Department funding of Israeli weapons projects
through 2002, McArthur says.
Loans made to Israel by the U.S. government, like the recently awarded
$9 billion, invariably wind up being paid by the American taxpayer. A
recent Congressional Research Service report indicates that Israel has
received $42 billion in waived loans. "Therefore, it is reasonable to
consider all government loans to Israel the same as grants," McArthur
says.
Support for Israel has cost America dearly - well over than $10,000
per
American - however the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been extremely
costly for the entire world. According to Stauffer, the total bill for
supporting Israel is two to four times higher than that for the U.S.
alone -
costing the global community an estimated $6 to $12 trillion
http://www.rense.com/general41/trill.htm
Yitzhak Isaac Goldstein
B J Foster
>
>On 31/07/2011 12:25 PM, B J Foster wrote:
>>>> If you're a Nazi, it's quite likely that you owe your life to a Jewish
>>>> >medical invention. Oh the irony!
>>>
>
>> community and how they have achieved it in a positive way - by building,
>> creating, inventing and improving society.
>>
>> Unlike white trash like you - that preaches jealousy and hate.
Does your head hurt? Probably. Well, if it does, *deal* with it because
aspirin was discovered by a Jew.
If Hitler's prostitute mother had taken oral contraceptives (developed
by a Jew) then we all might have been spared the pain and suffering
caused by that psycho.
OTOH how many low IQ nazi fuckwits like you *don't* get born per annum?
Topaz
"He was born into humble circumstances, the son of an obscure civil
servant in a remote corner of a crumbling empire, yet his name
resounds throughout the world to this day.
He was rejected by the universities of his time for formal enrollment
in art and in architecture, and yet he erected mighty buildings and
monuments, and today a simple postcard that he drew in ink or charcoal
fetches staggering sums at auction.
He fought as a front line soldier through all four years of the
greatest war in history up to that time, never rising above the rank
of corporal, but he won both of his country's highest decorations for
bravery under fire and rose to command the mightiest armies on earth.
Almost unique in the history of his century, he was not a lawyer or an
aristocrat or a man of inherited wealth and privilege, but a man who
once earned his daily bread with the labor of his hands, and yet he
conquered politics and rose to the leadership of the most brilliant
and creative nation on earth. So that his people might travel across
the land he loved quickly and cheaply, he created a simple and sturdy
automobile still in use today, and a network of highways that still
spans Germany. His game and forestry laws are still in force, and are
praised by ecologists as a model of environmental protection. His
economic program received the sincerest form of flattery from the
loathsome Roosevelt, who stole it and copied it into the context of
the American Depression as his own.
Every man who ever met him personally, even those who became his
bitterest enemies, spoke of him forever afterwards with awe and
admiration. His courtesy and his gallantry toward women were
legendary. With his power and his prestige he could have had any woman
he wanted, but the woman he chose as his life's partner, and who
eventually died by his side, was a simple and humble daughter of the
people.
He did not drink. He did not smoke. He was a lifelong lover of animals
and children and was happiest in the company of toddlers rather than
statesmen and soldiers, and no one ever overheard him use a profane
word or tell a smutty joke. He lifted his people up from the mud of
defeat and despair and alien domination, and he died trying to do the
same for all of us.
To this day, his memory is kept green by the Aryan peoples of Germany
and the world, even though it means prison, and in some countries
death, to honor him or his legacy within the sight or hearing of the
tyrant. He has been slandered, vilified, lied about, cursed,
distorted, and damned every day since his death by the most powerful
and evil tyranny mankind has ever known, and yet his name and his
Symbol cannot be suppressed by force or by propaganda. As we begin
this new Millennium, his book is read and his name is on more lips
than ever before and his image and his strength fills the hearts of a
whole new generation of young Aryan men and women."
"When your mother has grown older,
When her dear, faithful eyes
no longer see life as they once did,
When her feet, grown tired,
No longer want to carry her as she walks -
Then lend her your arm in support,
Escort her with happy pleasure.
The hour will come when, weeping, you
Must accompany her on her final walk.
And if she asks you something,
Then give her an answer.
And if she asks again, then speak!
And if she asks yet again, respond to her,
Not impatiently, but with gentle calm.
And if she cannot understand you properly
Explain all to her happily.
The hour will come, the bitter hour,
When her mouth asks for nothing more."
Those lines were written by Adolf Hitler, in 1923."
In the Thicket of the Forest at Artois
"It was in the thicket of the Artois Wood.
Deep in the trees, on blood-soaked ground,
Lay stretched a wounded German warrior,
And his cries rang out in the night.
In vain ... no echo answered his plea ...
Will he bleed to death like a beast,
That shot in the gut dies alone?
Then suddenly ...
Heavy steps approach from the right
He hears how they stamp on the forest floor ...
And new hope springs from his soul.
And now from the left ...
And now from both sides ...
Two men approach his miserable bed
A German it is, and a Frenchman.
And each watches the other with distrustful glance, And threatening
they aim their weapons.
The German warrior asks:
"What do you do here?"
"I was touched by the needy one's call for help."
"It's your enemy!"
"It is a man who suffers."
And both, wordless, lowered their weapons.
Then entwined their hands
And, with muscles tensed, carefully lifted
The wounded warrior, as if on a stretcher,
And carried him through the woods.
'Til they came to the German outposts.
"Now it is over. He will get good care."
And the Frenchman turns back toward the woods.
But the German grasps for his hand,
Looks, moved, into sorrow-dimmed eyes
And says to him with earnest foreboding:
"I know not what fate holds for us,
Which inscrutably rules in the stars.
Perhaps I shall fall, a victim of your bullet.
Maybe mine will fell you on the sand
For indifferent is the chance of battles.
Yet, however it may be and whatever may come:
We lived these sacred hours,
Where man found himself in man ...
And now, farewell! And God be with you!"
Adolf Hitler, 1916
B J Foster
>
> > On 31/07/2011 12:25 PM, B J Foster wrote:
>>>>> If you're a Nazi, it's quite likely that you owe your life to a Jewish
>>>>> >medical invention. Oh the irony!
>>>>
>>> You ought to pay attention to the Jews, what they have achieved as a
>>> community and how they have achieved it in a positive way - by building,
>>> creating, inventing and improving society.
>>>
>>> Unlike white trash like you - that preaches jealousy and hate.
>
> Does your head hurt? Probably. Well, if it does, *deal* with it because aspirin was discovered by a Jew.
>
> If Hitler's prostitute mother had taken oral contraceptives (developed by a Jew) then we all might have been spared the pain and suffering caused by that psycho.
>
> OTOH how many low IQ nazi fuckwits like you *don't* get born per annum?
You might want to try out X-Rays (also invented by a Jew) to do a
brainscan. OTOH a scanning electron microscope (another Jooish plot?)
might be better - think small and scan bottom-up. Report if you find
anything.
Topaz
It is said that the Jews, at least the Ashkenazi Jews, have a
higher average IQ than Whites, at least Whites as loosely defined
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
B J Foster
> "racism" and "racism"
Wotta pity your mum dinnen know about the pill[1]
[1] Jooish invention #765,284
CUNTICA
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART
SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
BURP - BURP!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART
SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
BURP - BURP!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART
SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
BURP - BURP!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART
SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
BURP - BURP!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART
SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
BURP - BURP!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART!
FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAART
SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
FLUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSH!
AWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWH!
CUNTICA
Gobble - gobble, slurp - slurp, licky - licky!
\Y/
^
( )
I I
OI IO
NEMO
Adolf Hitler: his father was almost certainly a bastard son of the jew
Frankenberg. Hitler's born out of wedlock half brother, Alois,
convicted for bigamy and thievery, clearly showed jewish traits
deriving from the common grandfather Frankenberg. Hitler might also be
a Rothschild bastard, see following and judge by yourself:
http://www.davidick.com/icke/articles/hitler.html
Reinhard Tristan Eugen Heydrich: the son of Bruno Heydrich, actually
Suess. This knowledge was actively suppressed by the nazis. The full
jew Suess looked a lot like the lead character of the nazi propaganda
film "Suess the Jew", shown all over the Reich during the war.
Reinhard's mother was a half jewish actress. He was discharged from
the navy after insulting a girl he had knocked up. he was the one to
forge the documents "proving" that Ernst Roehm was plotting against
Hitler. Roehm, commander of 4 million SA troups, mostly battle
veterans, was loyal to the original nazi party line of abolishing
interest. A step harking back to the times of the Knights Templar. The
abolishment of Usury, a jewish speciality, was considered true
christian policy then, but Rome crushed the templars and the usury
free zone. Ernst Roehm also went for the moderate jewish policy, of
only limiting their dominance of the media, entertainment, industry,
law and medicine, intellectual life and only expulison of the recently
settled eastern jews. The murder of Roehm meant killing the moderate
revolutionary wing, and the almost total control of he nazi party by
jewish mongrels. Heydrich had a brother who was denied membership in a
students' union, because of his jewish mannerisms. Reinhard, meaning
approx. "pure" or "pureheart" qua "Lionheart", was a name taken on by
the Goldmanns according to names researcher Kessler.
Heinrich Himmler had a jewish grandmother, an Italian fruit stand
merchant.
Herman Goering's wife's maiden name, Sonneman, derived from the hebrew
Simson.
Hans Frank, Hitler's attorney, wa son of a jewish lawyer from Bamburg.
In 1933 he announced: "The jewish question can only be solved by
establishing a jewish State"
Dr. Joseph Goebbels,prime nazi propagandist, was of spanish jewish
stock, called Rabbi in the school. His jewish mother in law,
Friedlander, lived in his household until the end of the war.
Alfred Rosenberg, baltic jew, totlay infatuated with a jewish
redhead.
Lanz von Liebenfels, dumped for lewd conduct from priest school, son
of the jewess Hopfenreich, published the anti semitic ariosophic
magazine "Ostara" in Vienna, a great inspiration for the young Hitler.
Lanz said: "we grant the jews full right to a state in Palestine"
Ribbentrop and Chaim Weizmann were drinking buddies. Weizmann was the
jewish spokesman to have Judea declare war on germany in 1933.
Hitler took over the "Peoples Observer" in 1920 with economic help
from Trebitsch Lincoln/Moses Pinkeles hungarian jew. when he died in
1943, Rosenberg wrote the obituary in the "Observer". In a beerhall in
Munich Hitler and Lincoln agreed that "anti semitism can only be of
value in jewish hands"
Adolf Eichmann a catholic jew, born near Haifa in Egypt, spoke hebrew,
yiddish and german, came as a child to Solingen, then Linz, Austria.
Kessler documents there were no Eichmanns before the early 19.th
century.
There was close co-operation between Heydrich's gestapo, and jewish
hagana in Palestine.One jewish collaborator in berlin, Schkolnik and
behind him future prime minister of Israel, Levi Eschkol, told the
german magazine "Spiegel"in 1965, that "in the beginning of Hitlers'
regime I stayed within for awhile."
Faivel Polkes, Polish jew and leader of Hagana. met with Eichamnn in
Berlin 1937. he got this written affirmation by Eichmann "A body,
representing jews in Germany, will exert pressure on those leaving
Germany to only emigrate to Palestine. Such a policy is in the
interest of Germany and will be executed by the gestapo. Polkes
invited Eichmann to Palestine. 2nd october 1937, Eichmann as editor of
the "Berlin Daily" stepped down from the ship "Romania" in Haifa.
After coming home he reported: "people of jewish national circles are
very excited about the radical german policy towards jews, because
this has increased jewish population in Palestine manyfold. In a short
time they will be the majority among arabs."
Julius Streicher published the "Stuermer" anti semitic gutter rag,
full of jewish ritual murder and sexual crimes. It was the only
admitted porn mag. in the third Reich, spewing out perverted filth
from 1923-1945. Filthy drawings that gave sensitive souls nightmares
were drawn by the jew Jonas Wolk alias Fritz Brandt. Streicher was to
be hanged in Nuremberg 1946, but he was either strangled or had his
throat slit kosher style. When asked for his name he answered "you
know it" and went to the scaffold with a "heil Hitler" and "purim fest
1946. Observers called the ghastly execution "Scariest of the night".
Two german workers in the crematorium were pledged to silence. The box
was marked "Abraham Goldberg" for him it was indeed. Of 500.000
German jews, 300.000 emigrated before the war, mostly to Palestine.
Takes one to know one i guess?
The nazis rescued the Rebbe Faivel Schneerson out of Warszaw, who is
tied in with the blackest of talmudism and ritual murder.
Hennecke Kardel's book, "Hitler, Founder of Israel", is full of
goodies. Heydrich was a 3/4 jew no less, the one Hitler saw a
potential heir in. Heydrich concocted a plot of forgeries to miscredit
leading USSR personel, and paranoid "Uncle Joe" ate it hook and sink,
a devious plot, worthy of those people who brought us the Holocaust.
Heydrich was in charge of the sonder kommandos on the east front, that
would kill red commissars on sight. Today we know, thanks to
revisionists, that those murders were grossly exagerated after the
war.
Franco was a sephardic jew, supported by Balearic jews.
Admiral Canaris of the abwehr was a greek jew. He tried to get a deal
with the US against USSR and was willing to get rid of Hitler, and was
strangled on a meathook as a traitor.
After Ernst Roehm of the SA, an upright soldier FOR defense AGAINST
agression and a supporter of Feders NS party program of abolishing
interest was snuffed in 1934, the fact was that ALL who had ANY
leverage in the NS leadership had JEWISH BLOOD in them.
Theres many more bits, i cant remember them, I'm sitting in a netcafe.
I have read Des Griffin who also has some good bits and views, and a
quote from Eustace Mullins comes to my mind, that "most conflicts
actually are warring jewish factions". WW2 could be seen as such.
-------
Apart from more Kardel, I'm getting this book Dietrich Bronder's
"Before Hitler came". From that book: "In 1921 Hitler bought the anti
semitic newspaper "Peoples Observer" from the head of the Thule order,
Sebottendorf, for 100.000 marks in cash, of which his friend Trebitsch
Lincoln contributed 30.000 mark"
Another bit: Martin Luther, the church revolutionary who betrayed the
farmers and caused a wave of witch burning in his wake, wrote "The
jews and their Lies". Dr. Goebbels, a dutch jew, seems to be almost
qouting it word for word. According to a german theologian i talked
with recently, Luther was pissed off at the jews for the following
reason: he thought they were going to convert to the christian faith
after his reforms, which didn't happen. Maybe they promised him
something? Luther's name suggests he is of an old "aristocratic"
lineage, going back to Wodan/Odin. My view is, that the catholic
church took on the symbolism of the ancient indo european
spirituality, expressed f. x. in the gothic cathedrals, that are
almost exact analogues to pharaonic egyptian symbolism. Thus,
protestantism broke the powerhold of Rome, but also severed the ties
to its veiled spiritual heritage, laid out in works as f. x. "The
Emerald Tablet" of Hermes Teuth.
---------
If I could get your readership to read Kardel, and debate it, I would
feel I would have accomplished a wee bit. It's dynamite, I judge it to
be at least 90 percent accurate, and if it's ordered from A1 books in
San Diego, they send a stack of papers on zionist crimes along with
it. Get it, it's worthwhile!
I'm trying to make some "inroads" concerning the "Holohoax". A few
weeks ago I smoked a joint and had a beer with a Pole. I started
pointing out that the nazis were blamed and convicted at IMT for the
red army's Katyn massacre, which Gorby admitted was a red army doing
in 1991. And told him some of Wiesels and others' blatant lies. He
couldnt argue against me, but walked out on me and called me a
demagogue(?), wouldn't hear anymore about the Holohoax. 60 years af
brain wash don't go away in 5 minutes - I attest to that. I'm going to
get this to some danish historians in due time, plant some seeds where
they might catch hold.
Further bits: Lanz von Liebenfels, jewish mongrel, the publisher of
"Ostara" in Vienna, anti semitic magazine that influenced Hitler,
acknowledged the right of jews to a state in Palestine. Hans Frank,
another semi heeby jeeby, in charge of occupied Poland, acknowledged
the right of jews to a state in Palestine. And the list goes on,
Eichmann, another yid, acknowledged the right of jews to a state in
Palestine. And so on!
Eichmann was a full jew, with a schnauz that stuck out like the key to
a synagogue.
Hitler's Dr., Morell, was a jew, filled the Fuehrer with speedballs
and other strange concoctions. The snake oil pusher made millions, and
got away frank and free, he had been a "resistance fighter", while Dr.
Brandt was hanged for his involvement in the euthanasia program (and
for telling the fuehrer he was turning into a junkie wreck?)
The pressure was laid on the jews by the nazis to fuck off, but NO ONE
wanted them in. Chaim Weizmann, british spokesyid, close drinking
buddy of Von Ribbentrop (maybe NOT a yid mongrel, just for variety?),
thundered against taking them in. Rabbi Stephen Wise of New York,
thundered against taking them in. And so on!
The pressure was laid on the jews to go to "Holyland" and no where
else if possible. By the wolves, leaders, and hidden sponsors like
Rothschild, who didn't go there themselves.
Madagascar was suggested, but the zion heebies went there and bitched
about the climate. Stalin had a reservation made for them. But
Palestine/Holyland was always #1, great climate, and as Nahum Goldmann
put it: "Palestine was chosen for pragmatic reasons. it is the
geopolitical turning point of three continents, and has lots of
resources."
Overall conclusion: The rivalry between warring factions/tribes of
jews was overruled by the common zionist agenda, that only had few
opponents among jews. The western sephardic nazi jews were somewhat
less brutal and ruthless, than the eastern khazar/ashkenazim red army
brutes. Today in Israel this rivalry continues, and, NO Bob Marley,
you ain't "Jah People"!
---------
In a beerhall in Muenich, the early twenties, Hitler has a
conversation with Trebitsch-Lincoln, alias Moses Pinkeles, an
adventurer, and the first german spy to be a member of the british
House of Commons. They agree that jews, especially eastern jews, are
horrible people obsessed with material possesions and lack of
spirituality. How good to be rid of them, and what better place than
sending them back to the desert, to Palestine.
"What do you need Herr Hitler?" Trebitsch slips Hitler 30.000 marks,
and from other sources he gets the other 70.000 marks to buy the
"Peoples Observer" from Sebottendorf.
Zionism and nazism, two roads, with a common goal!
NEMO
woman.......
& would Carolina Coon ever be happy!
\Y/
^
( )
I I
I I
OI IO
CUNTICA
On Aug 27, 5:43 pm, "Carolina Reb" <walt.hamp...@att.net> wrote:
.