Bammer's attacks on FOX News will backfire big time
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
If FOX is smart they'll adopt as their slogan "Folks, if the govt hates us
- you know we're doing our job."
Keep up the good work. glen.
Demon Buddha
Write Fox and suggest it. Not a bad idea at all.
queenie
wrote:
Suggest that they become a real news organization as well.
RD (The Sandman)
news:3hv9d5dch1kkloqt5...@4ax.com:
Do you watch them? Do you know the difference between a journalist in
radio and a political commentator? Can you name one of their journalists
or news reporters? I am sure you can name some of their political
commentators but are you confusing them?
--
Sleep well tonight,
RD (The Sandman)
On TV, they show how detergents take out bloodstains. A pretty
violent image. I think if you've got a Tshirt full of bloodstains,
maybe laundry isn't your biggest problem. Maybe you should get rid
of the body before you do the wash and get some different friends.
The Greyhound & Jessica Alba
Says the person who takes political talking points from Rolling Stone
magazine.
queenie
Just because you said so, doesn't mean that it's true.
Rev. Dr. Ben Rand III, Esq, PhD
wrote:
>Suggest that they become a real news organization as well.
They should fact check SNL more for Barry, just to make sure everyone
talks honestly about him, our Leader.
And if they don't start doing stories on how good Barry is, we should
firebomb and nuke their buildings and blow up Bill O'Reilly.
And Sean Hannity, he needs to be blown up, real good.
We shall have no dissent at all, because dissent makes everyone angry
and mean and not liking fluffy bunnies and wildlife.
queenie
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote in
>news:3hv9d5dch1kkloqt5...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:55:06 -0400, Demon Buddha <Nob...@no.where>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>>>> If FOX is smart they'll adopt as their slogan "Folks, if the govt
>>>> hates us - you know we're doing our job."
>>>>
>>>> Keep up the good work. glen.
>>>
>>> Write Fox and suggest it. Not a bad idea at all.
>>
>> Suggest that they become a real news organization as well.
>Do you watch them? Do you know the difference between a journalist in
>radio and a political commentator? Can you name one of their journalists
>or news reporters? I am sure you can name some of their political
>commentators but are you confusing them?
Actually, I do watch on occasion and I am never surprised about how
base and low Fox News goes to distort the facts. That's how I know,
among other things, about the inaccuracies in the news crawls...you
know, like when a Republican does something bad, they give the name
but they label them Democrat.
queenie
<fi...@absolution.coim> wrote:
>On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:25:46 -0400, queenie <que...@nospam.com>
>wrote:
>
>>Suggest that they become a real news organization as well.
>
>
>They should fact check SNL more for Barry, just to make sure everyone
>talks honestly about him, our Leader.
Like CNN?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/13/daily-show-destroys-cnn-f_n_318295.html
>And if they don't start doing stories on how good Barry is, we should
>firebomb and nuke their buildings and blow up Bill O'Reilly.
They can spend less time on teabaggers and birthers and talk about the
real issues.
>
>And Sean Hannity, he needs to be blown up, real good.
>We shall have no dissent at all, because dissent makes everyone angry
>and mean and not liking fluffy bunnies and wildlife.
We've always had dissent in this country. Can't you see any
difference between now and 10 years ago?
Demon Buddha
Try applying that adage to your own words. Cuts all ways.
queenie
wrote:
>queenie wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:07:11 -0700 (PDT), "The Greyhound & Jessica
>> Alba" <Graa...@aol.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 13, 6:25 pm, queenie <quee...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:55:06 -0400, Demon Buddha <Nob...@no.where>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>>>>>> If FOX is smart they'll adopt as their slogan "Folks, if the govt hates us
>>>>>> - you know we're doing our job."
>>>>>> Keep up the good work. glen.
>>>>> Write Fox and suggest it. Not a bad idea at all.
>>>> Suggest that they become a real news organization as well.
>>> Says the person who takes political talking points from Rolling Stone
>>> magazine.
>>
>> Just because you said so, doesn't mean that it's true.
>
> Try applying that adage to your own words. Cuts all ways.
It's up to you to apply it to my words. I have absolutely no problem
with that.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
news:G5adnUZ7ZYfYaknX...@giganews.com:
Yes it is a good idea and i've thought for years that if the media was
honest they would use that slogan. Instead they seem to live in fear that
the govt will accuse them of being disloyal if they disagree.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
news:3g1ad5hljuk3cmkue...@4ax.com:
>
> We shall have no dissent at all, because dissent makes everyone angry
> and mean and not liking fluffy bunnies and wildlife.
>
Hell - there's lots of dissent but it's all on the internet. The TV
networks are all pro-bammer.
No Bammer
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:07:11 -0700 (PDT), "The Greyhound & Jessica
> Alba" <Graa...@aol.com> wrote:
>
queenie, are you a female? If not you must be a FAGGOT.
queenie
The TV networks are all pro-big business.
lab~rat >:-)
>queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote in
>news:3hv9d5dch1kkloqt5...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:55:06 -0400, Demon Buddha <Nob...@no.where>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>>>> If FOX is smart they'll adopt as their slogan "Folks, if the govt
>>>> hates us - you know we're doing our job."
>>>>
>>>> Keep up the good work. glen.
>>>
>>> Write Fox and suggest it. Not a bad idea at all.
>>
>> Suggest that they become a real news organization as well.
>>
>>
>
>Do you watch them? Do you know the difference between a journalist in
>radio and a political commentator? Can you name one of their journalists
>or news reporters? I am sure you can name some of their political
>commentators but are you confusing them?
Christi Paul is an excellent news reporter for CNN. I watch her all
the time. I generally don't hear a thing she's saying, but I have to
say that I like her a lot.
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
What news network do you watch that you believe delivers unbiased
reporting? What shows specifically?
And what shows do you watch on FOX?
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
>you
>know, like when a Republican does something bad, they give the name
>but they label them Democrat.
Name one instance that this happened. Just one.
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
Maybe one day they'll launch a network just for you that's all pro
welfare grabbing.
lab~rat >:-)
MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> puked:
To a large extent, Glenn Beck has been using the concept on his show.
He seems to have taken great pride in the fact that the government,
specifically the cowardly white house, is at odds with him.
He even set up a "hotline" phone that only the WH supposedly knows the
number to so they can call at any time to correct any inaccuracies in
his stories.
The Greyhound & Jessica Alba
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:06:38 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
>
>
>
>
>
> <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
Maybe you should watch this before you run your mouth about anyone
distorting facts.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NRRMV_nDBt4
This comes from the Today show, which is on NBC not Fox.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
news:kjhbd5p03v9n367li...@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:20:15 -0500, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
> MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> puked:
>
>>
>>Yes it is a good idea and i've thought for years that if the media was
>>honest they would use that slogan. Instead they seem to live in fear
>>that the govt will accuse them of being disloyal if they disagree.
>
> To a large extent, Glenn Beck has been using the concept on his show.
> He seems to have taken great pride in the fact that the government,
> specifically the cowardly white house, is at odds with him.
>
Sure - all networks should do that. But they seem to worry that if they
make the WH mad, they will lose access. So what? An honest media would do
it's own research. American media has as it's motto - "The govt tells us
what happened and then we tell you". What a bunch of crap.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
news:05fbd5lunab1if4jk...@4ax.com:
They're all pro-govt and pro-business. All of our leaders whether in the
media, govt, military or business work together in a conspiracy against the
public.
queenie
MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote in
>news:05fbd5lunab1if4jk...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:21:55 -0500, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
>> MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Rev. Dr. Ben Rand III, Esq, PhD" <fi...@absolution.coim> wrote in
>>>news:3g1ad5hljuk3cmkue...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> We shall have no dissent at all, because dissent makes everyone angry
>>>> and mean and not liking fluffy bunnies and wildlife.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Hell - there's lots of dissent but it's all on the internet. The TV
>>>networks are all pro-bammer.
>>
>> The TV networks are all pro-big business.
>They're all pro-govt and pro-business. All of our leaders whether in the
>media, govt, military or business work together in a conspiracy against the
>public.
Fortunately, I haven't reached that level of cynicism. I still
believe there are good elected officials and most of them are
Democrat.
RD (The Sandman)
news:fd2ad5t55osm841vf...@4ax.com:
Bullshit. Don't make crap up, Queenie. They are the highest rated news
group on cable TV. They are considered more fair and balanced than their
competition in CNN, MSNBC and CNBC. However, their political
commentators are conservatives. Most folks like you disagree with that
and think everyone should kiss Obama's ass or get a "thrill up their
leg" whenever he appears like Chris Matthews does. BTW, according to
some surveys, they have a larger groups of the middle, people who id
themselves as independents, libertarian and liberal than most of the
other cable news.
So I asked you if you could identify which folks on FOX were newsfolk and
which were political commentators. You have not done that.
RD (The Sandman)
I would agree and Blitzer isn't too bad. However, I would never call
McCafferty any thing other than a political commentator. Same with Chris
Matthews and Keith Olbermann at MSNBC. At FOX, I consider Shepherd Smith
to be a straight newsman, Greta Van Susteren the same, as far fair and
evenly balanced goes and so is Julie Bandaras. O'Reilly is a self
proclaimed Libertarian who surprizes people from time to time with his
stances although most of them are conservative, Hannity is a self
confessed Reagan Conservative and Glen Beck is a Libertarian entertainer.
Most folks, however, seem to confuse those three as the news arm of FOX
news which they are not.
RD (The Sandman)
news:3g1ad5hljuk3cmkue...@4ax.com:
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:25:46 -0400, queenie <que...@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
>>Suggest that they become a real news organization as well.
>
>
> They should fact check SNL more for Barry, just to make sure everyone
> talks honestly about him, our Leader.
>
> And if they don't start doing stories on how good Barry is, we should
> firebomb and nuke their buildings and blow up Bill O'Reilly.
>
> And Sean Hannity, he needs to be blown up, real good.
Excuse me, but neither one of them are on SNL. That is an NBC creation.
RD (The Sandman)
news:05fbd5lunab1if4jk...@4ax.com:
But their editors and reporters are usually liberal.
queenie
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote in
>news:fd2ad5t55osm841vf...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:06:38 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
>> <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Do you watch them? Do you know the difference between a journalist in
>>>radio and a political commentator? Can you name one of their
>>>journalists or news reporters? I am sure you can name some of their
>>>political commentators but are you confusing them?
>>
>> Actually, I do watch on occasion and I am never surprised about how
>> base and low Fox News goes to distort the facts. That's how I know,
>> among other things, about the inaccuracies in the news crawls...you
>> know, like when a Republican does something bad, they give the name
>> but they label them Democrat.
>
>Bullshit. Don't make crap up, Queenie. They are the highest rated news
>group on cable TV.
So what? Who was it who said, "No one ever went broke underestimating
the American public."
> They are considered more fair and balanced than their
>competition in CNN, MSNBC and CNBC.
By whom? What are the demographics? If Teabaggers and Birthers are
any indication....
> However, their political
>commentators are conservatives. Most folks like you disagree with that
>and think everyone should kiss Obama's ass or get a "thrill up their
>leg" whenever he appears like Chris Matthews does. BTW, according to
>some surveys, they have a larger groups of the middle, people who id
>themselves as independents, libertarian and liberal than most of the
>other cable news.
Again, so what? Those people could watch Fox News for the same reason
that I watch....to see how they cover or don't cover certain events.
>
>So I asked you if you could identify which folks on FOX were newsfolk and
>which were political commentators. You have not done that.
What would it prove? I could Google that information. The fact is, I
don't Fox News enough to know the on-air news personalities names. I
know O'Reilly, Hannity and Beck aren't newscasters, they're the morons
worshipped by Teabaggers and Birthers.
Because I couldn't remember the names involved in the mislabeling, I
did Google this and Fox News is even worse than I thought.
http://intershame.com/on/Fox_News/
queenie
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote in
>news:05fbd5lunab1if4jk...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:21:55 -0500, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
>> MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Rev. Dr. Ben Rand III, Esq, PhD" <fi...@absolution.coim> wrote in
>>>news:3g1ad5hljuk3cmkue...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> We shall have no dissent at all, because dissent makes everyone angry
>>>> and mean and not liking fluffy bunnies and wildlife.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Hell - there's lots of dissent but it's all on the internet. The TV
>>>networks are all pro-bammer.
>>
>> The TV networks are all pro-big business.
>
>But their editors and reporters are usually liberal.
So...they take their marching orders from big business when it really
counts.
queenie
wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:44:24 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
><rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote in
>>news:fd2ad5t55osm841vf...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:06:38 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
>>> <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>Do you watch them? Do you know the difference between a journalist in
>>>>radio and a political commentator? Can you name one of their
>>>>journalists or news reporters? I am sure you can name some of their
>>>>political commentators but are you confusing them?
>>>
>>> Actually, I do watch on occasion and I am never surprised about how
>>> base and low Fox News goes to distort the facts. That's how I know,
>>> among other things, about the inaccuracies in the news crawls...you
>>> know, like when a Republican does something bad, they give the name
>>> but they label them Democrat.
>>
>>Bullshit. Don't make crap up, Queenie. They are the highest rated news
>>group on cable TV.
>
>So what? Who was it who said, "No one ever went broke underestimating the taste of
>the American public."
Fixed it.
No Bammer
You never did answer my question. Are you a female or a faggot.
The Greyhound & Jessica Biel
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:07:11 -0700 (PDT), "The Greyhound & Jessica
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Oct 13, 6:25 pm, queenie <quee...@nospam.com> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:55:06 -0400, Demon Buddha <Nob...@no.where>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
> >> >> If FOX is smart they'll adopt as their slogan "Folks, if the govt hates us
> >> >> - you know we're doing our job."
>
> >> >> Keep up the good work. glen.
>
> >> > Write Fox and suggest it. Not a bad idea at all.
>
>
> >magazine.
<< Just because you said so, doesn't mean that it's true.>>
OK. Is this proof enough? I especially like the THINK & LEARN
part.
Newsgroups: alt.fan.howard-stern
From: queenie <quee...@nospam.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:47:38 -0400
Local: Thurs, Oct 9 2008 3:47 pm
Subject: Re: You can't handle the truth!
Silly me to think any Bushie, who has the attention span of a gnat,
would want to read an informative article about the man who is
running
for President! That certainly explains why you think McCain/Palin
are
a fit team to lead the country.
Just in case someone wants to THINK and LEARN, here is the link.
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the_real_john_mccain
RD (The Sandman)
news:neecd5pdra1hid84q...@4ax.com:
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:44:24 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
> <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote in
>>news:fd2ad5t55osm841vf...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:06:38 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
>>> <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>Do you watch them? Do you know the difference between a journalist
>>>>in radio and a political commentator? Can you name one of their
>>>>journalists or news reporters? I am sure you can name some of their
>>>>political commentators but are you confusing them?
>>>
>>> Actually, I do watch on occasion and I am never surprised about how
>>> base and low Fox News goes to distort the facts. That's how I know,
>>> among other things, about the inaccuracies in the news crawls...you
>>> know, like when a Republican does something bad, they give the name
>>> but they label them Democrat.
>>
>>Bullshit. Don't make crap up, Queenie. They are the highest rated
>>news group on cable TV.
>
> So what? Who was it who said, "No one ever went broke underestimating
> the American public."
>
>> They are considered more fair and balanced than their
>>competition in CNN, MSNBC and CNBC.
>
> By whom? What are the demographics? If Teabaggers and Birthers are
> any indication....
The demographics cover the board.
>> However, their political
>>commentators are conservatives. Most folks like you disagree with
>>that and think everyone should kiss Obama's ass or get a "thrill up
>>their leg" whenever he appears like Chris Matthews does. BTW,
>>according to some surveys, they have a larger groups of the middle,
>>people who id themselves as independents, libertarian and liberal than
>>most of the other cable news.
>
> Again, so what? Those people could watch Fox News for the same reason
> that I watch....to see how they cover or don't cover certain events.
Nice dodge.......
>>So I asked you if you could identify which folks on FOX were newsfolk
>>and which were political commentators. You have not done that.
>
> What would it prove? I could Google that information. The fact is, I
> don't Fox News enough to know the on-air news personalities names. I
> know O'Reilly, Hannity and Beck aren't newscasters, they're the morons
> worshipped by Teabaggers and Birthers.
Yep, uh huh....
> Because I couldn't remember the names involved in the mislabeling, I
> did Google this and Fox News is even worse than I thought.
>
>
> http://intershame.com/on/Fox_News/
An opinion site.....my, my. Why don't you produce a cite from Rasmussen
or Pew?
RD (The Sandman)
news:o-mdnTuTHOEM3kvX...@earthlink.com:
I really don't think that makes any difference in opinions. Unless, of
course, you are looking for a hookup....
RD (The Sandman)
news:vmfcd5pqi86ubqfm7...@4ax.com:
Waiting on your proof....... We all opinions, they are like assholes
since everybody has at least one. Anyway, our opinions differ.
queenie
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote in
>news:neecd5pdra1hid84q...@4ax.com:
>> Because I couldn't remember the names involved in the mislabeling, I
>> did Google this and Fox News is even worse than I thought.
>>
>>
>> http://intershame.com/on/Fox_News/
>
>An opinion site.....my, my. Why don't you produce a cite from Rasmussen
>or Pew?
I thought you'd enjoy the pictures.
queenie
I thought that was an excellent article. And America agreed with me
and rejected team McCain/Palin.
queenie
>On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:13:46 -0400, queenie
><que...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>>But their editors and reporters are usually liberal.
>>
>>So...they take their marching orders from big business when it really
>>counts.
>
>No, they do not
>
>Editorial boards with respected news journalists would
>walk out.
No they wouldn't because the like to eat and pay their mortgages on
time.
RD (The Sandman)
news:otlcd5lda0grjjj8a...@4ax.com:
Ahhhh, a sense of humor......often missing in these newsgroups.
queenie
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote in
>news:vmfcd5pqi86ubqfm7...@4ax.com:
>
>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:57:12 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
>> <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>>queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote in
>>>news:05fbd5lunab1if4jk...@4ax.com:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:21:55 -0500, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
>>>> MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Rev. Dr. Ben Rand III, Esq, PhD" <fi...@absolution.coim> wrote in
>>>>>news:3g1ad5hljuk3cmkue...@4ax.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We shall have no dissent at all, because dissent makes everyone
>angry
>>>>>> and mean and not liking fluffy bunnies and wildlife.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Hell - there's lots of dissent but it's all on the internet. The TV
>>>>>networks are all pro-bammer.
>>>>
>>>> The TV networks are all pro-big business.
>>>
>>>But their editors and reporters are usually liberal.
>>
>> So...they take their marching orders from big business when it really
>> counts.
>Waiting on your proof...
Proof of what?
> We all opinions, they are like assholes
>since everybody has at least one.
And some of them stink.
>Anyway, our opinions differ.
Rev. Dr. Ben Rand III, Esq, PhD
>I can't think of any recent story where the corporate
>ownership dictated what news would be
>broadcast.--Except at the Moonie Times and Faux snooze.
MSNBC, daily.
Look it up, brain dead moron.
Morton Davis
"queenie" <que...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:neecd5pdra1hid84q...@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:44:24 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
> <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote in
>>news:fd2ad5t55osm841vf...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:06:38 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
>>> <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>>Do you watch them? Do you know the difference between a journalist in
>>>>radio and a political commentator? Can you name one of their
>>>>journalists or news reporters? I am sure you can name some of their
>>>>political commentators but are you confusing them?
>>>
>>> Actually, I do watch on occasion and I am never surprised about how
>>> base and low Fox News goes to distort the facts. That's how I know,
>>> among other things, about the inaccuracies in the news crawls...you
>>> know, like when a Republican does something bad, they give the name
>>> but they label them Democrat.
>>
>>Bullshit. Don't make crap up, Queenie. They are the highest rated news
>>group on cable TV.
>
> So what? Who was it who said, "No one ever went broke underestimating
> the American public."
>
>> They are considered more fair and balanced than their
>>competition in CNN, MSNBC and CNBC.
>
> By whom? What are the demographics? If Teabaggers and Birthers are
> any indication....
>
Average Americans - usually better educated than these geniuses:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mm1KOBMg1Y8
lab~rat >:-)
<rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> puked:
>> Christi Paul is an excellent news reporter for CNN. I watch her all
>> the time. I generally don't hear a thing she's saying, but I have to
>> say that I like her a lot.
>
>I would agree and Blitzer isn't too bad. However, I would never call
>McCafferty any thing other than a political commentator. Same with Chris
>Matthews and Keith Olbermann at MSNBC. At FOX, I consider Shepherd Smith
>to be a straight newsman
<snip>
Well I think you missed my point, but in case you didn't, there's
nothing wrong with being a straight newsman, you can still think the
guy's hot I guess. But if you want to go outside the hardcore shit, I
like Robin Meade a lot. Especially when she wears those tall black
boots and the tight shirts...
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
>On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:45:47 -0700 (PDT), "The Greyhound & Jessica
>Biel" <Graa...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>On Oct 13, 7:13ÔøΩpm, queenie <quee...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:07:11 -0700 (PDT), "The Greyhound & Jessica
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Alba" <Graaho...@aol.com> wrote:
>>> >On Oct 13, 6:25ÔøΩpm, queenie <quee...@nospam.com> wrote:
>>> >> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:55:06 -0400, Demon Buddha <Nob...@no.where>
>>> >> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> >Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>>> >> >> If FOX is smart they'll adopt as their slogan "Folks, if the govt hates us
>>> >> >> - you know we're doing our job."
>>>
>>> >> >> Keep up the good work. glen.
>>>
>>> >> > ÔøΩ ÔøΩWrite Fox and suggest it. ÔøΩNot a bad idea at all.
>>>
>>> >> Suggest that they become a real news organization as well.
>>>
>>> >Says the person who takes political talking points from Rolling Stone
>>> >magazine.
>>
>>
>><< Just because you said so, doesn't mean that it's true.>>
>>
>>
>>OK. Is this proof enough? I especially like the THINK & LEARN
>>part.
>>
>>
>>Newsgroups: alt.fan.howard-stern
>>From: queenie <quee...@nospam.com>
>>Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:47:38 -0400
>>Local: Thurs, Oct 9 2008 3:47 pm
>>Subject: Re: You can't handle the truth!
>>
>>
>>
>>Silly me to think any Bushie, who has the attention span of a gnat,
>>would want to read an informative article about the man who is
>>running
>>for President! That certainly explains why you think McCain/Palin
>>are
>>a fit team to lead the country.
>>
>>Just in case someone wants to THINK and LEARN, here is the link.
>>
>>http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the_real_john_mccain
>
>I thought that was an excellent article. And America agreed with me
>and rejected team McCain/Palin.
Congratulations on being part of the thoughtless herd...
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
>On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:53:22 -0500, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
>MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote in
>>news:05fbd5lunab1if4jk...@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:21:55 -0500, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
>>> MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Rev. Dr. Ben Rand III, Esq, PhD" <fi...@absolution.coim> wrote in
>>>>news:3g1ad5hljuk3cmkue...@4ax.com:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> We shall have no dissent at all, because dissent makes everyone angry
>>>>> and mean and not liking fluffy bunnies and wildlife.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hell - there's lots of dissent but it's all on the internet. The TV
>>>>networks are all pro-bammer.
>>>
>>> The TV networks are all pro-big business.
>
>>They're all pro-govt and pro-business. All of our leaders whether in the
>>media, govt, military or business work together in a conspiracy against the
>>public.
>
>Fortunately, I haven't reached that level of cynicism. I still
>believe there are good elected officials and most of them are
>Democrat.
Just for kicks, name some of your favorites. Besides JFK and Obama.
lab~rat >:-)
puked:
And no one wants to hear from them...
Boo Radley
"lab~rat >:-)" <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote in message
news:kfhbd51h7c3rc4dgs...@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 19:22:02 -0400, queenie <que...@nospam.com>
> puked:
>
>>you
>>know, like when a Republican does something bad, they give the name
>>but they label them Democrat.
>
Mark Foley
http://www.roughlydrafted.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/oreilly-foley-d-3.jpg
Mark Sanford
http://www.loudmurmurs.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/fnc-20090624-sanford.jpg
Lamar Alexander
http://www3.allaroundphilly.com/blogs/reporter/wesleym/Lamar%20-%20D.jpg
There's 3, enjoy!
lab~rat >:-)
Boo Radley
Nope, all of them are directly from Fox News. Keep that head buried in the
sand.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRcV_ARr-I4
Check out the skills of photoshopping live tv, idiot
Beam Me Up Scotty
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:58:22 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)"
> <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>
>>> I thought that was an excellent article. And America agreed with me
>>> and rejected team McCain/Palin.
>> Congratulations on being part of the thoughtless herd...
>> --
>
> he's right about McCain/Palin
>
> One wonders why you don't get it.
Did Obama lie to get in office? We will never know about McCain and
whether he lied.
So the evidence is that they voted for "someone" similar to McCain since
Obama kept taking the same side of issues that McCain did like TAX CUTS.
Who did they vote for, "Obama" that said he would do these things
below, or Obama that is doing none of them and now is attacking business
and capitalism with a passion.
*Obama*
Failure to keep Lobbyist out of his Administration.
Failure to close GITMO
Failure to hire people Qualified to do their job.
Failure to stop the economic slide into the abyss.
Failure to stop Iran from producing nuclear fissile material
Failure to stop ear marks.
Failure to bring *all* the troops home.
Failure to end the Patriot act.
Failure to create an effective energy plan.
Failure to drill for American Oil.
Failure to make coal cleaner.
Failure to lower taxes for 95%, instead he's raising a carbon tax/VAT tax.
Failure to get a dog from the pound.
Failure to create Bipartisanship in the USA
Failure to negotiate with terrorists/pirates rather than killing them.
Failure to read "line by line" any spending bills before signed
Failure to...
Failure to get the Olympics for Chicago
Failure to get Valerie Jarred big graft for her Chicago Slums
Failure to Talk to his Generals in the War Zone.
Failure to act decisively on the war in Afghanistan.
--
*The Civil war has begun and you just don't know it* ....Look at the
Liberal attacks on the people that raise their heads above the crowd,
the Liberals/Socialists viciously attempt to destroy them.
Joe the Plumber and Palin and Now Wilson and dozens in between.
They attack on every front, Internet hacking attacks, frivolous legal
attacks to consume energy and money, Personal attacks on opponents and
family. Propaganda attacks are coordinated across Liberal Media the
Unions and the Executive Branch and Congress and community organizing
foot soldiers...
If you remember back to the Revolutionary war, the War was waged by
*targeting the officers* of the English military to create disarray and
confusion in our enemy.
The Progressive-Socialists have been using this tactic for some time
now, they have adopted Saul Alinsky's plan to target their opponents and
viscously destroy them, these Socialists even try to *destroy the*
*Families* to destroy anyone that would show signs of organizing the
opposition into a cohesive resistance to the Socialist steam roller.
We haven't yet progressed to large battles with shooting in the streets
but we have violence and protests and subversive sabotage of the enemy.
Obama has declared war on his enemy and they are us.
The left has created a third front in America's war and it is the Civil
War against capitalism, the *Socialist In Chief* has decided to attack
our own, and in the midst of a foreign war he has increased the
hostility against our own people.
The Socialists have diverted the interest in winning in Afghanistan for
the attack and domination of the economy, for Socialism over Capitalism
and for the Government over the people of the USA.
lab~rat >:-)
<Kil...@mockingbird.com> puked:
I was really kidding when I said that, but I consider it a success to
make you call me a name...
lab~rat >:-)
>On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:58:22 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)"
><ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>
>>>I thought that was an excellent article. And America agreed with me
>>>and rejected team McCain/Palin.
>>
>>Congratulations on being part of the thoughtless herd...
>>--
>
>One would think the face evidence is overwhelming that
>he's right about McCain/Palin
>
>One wonders why you don't get it.
As excited as it makes you to think about a guy named "queenie", she's
a she and she's a welfare grabber...
lab~rat >:-)
>On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:59:07 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)"
><ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>
>>>Fortunately, I haven't reached that level of cynicism. I still
>>>believe there are good elected officials and most of them are
>>>Democrat.
>>
>>Just for kicks, name some of your favorites. Besides JFK and Obama.
>
>Just for reality---the policies from FDR to Obama---and
>the historical record of their accomplishments in
>making the middle class and America what it is---would
>seem to be more relevant.
>
>Name anything that conservatism ever did to help
>America become better.
Well I see you're trying to play an entirely different game than the
one that's in play here. Let's finish this one first before we wander
off in the woods.
The Greyhound & Jessica Biel
>
> I thought that was an excellent article. And America agreed with me
>
> - Show quoted text -
Judging from your posts, it makes sense that you get your political
information from a rock & roll magazine.
The Greyhound & Jessica Biel
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:59:07 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)"
>
> <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
> >>believe there are good elected officials and most of them are
> >>Democrat.
>
> >Just for kicks, name some of your favorites. Besides JFK and Obama.
>
> the historical record of their accomplishments in
> making the middle class and America what it is---would
> seem to be more relevant.
Jimmy Carter says "hi".
lab~rat >:-)
Biel" <Graa...@aol.com> puked:
>On Oct 14, 7:03ÔøΩpm, queenie <quee...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:45:47 -0700 (PDT), "The Greyhound & Jessica
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Biel" <Graaho...@aol.com> wrote:
>> >On Oct 13, 7:13ÔøΩpm, queenie <quee...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 16:07:11 -0700 (PDT), "The Greyhound & Jessica
>>
>> >> Alba" <Graaho...@aol.com> wrote:
>> >> >On Oct 13, 6:25ÔøΩpm, queenie <quee...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> >> >> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:55:06 -0400, Demon Buddha <Nob...@no.where>
>> >> >> wrote:
>>
>> >> >> >Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS wrote:
>> >> >> >> If FOX is smart they'll adopt as their slogan "Folks, if the govt hates us
>> >> >> >> - you know we're doing our job."
>>
>> >> >> >> Keep up the good work. glen.
>>
>> >> >> > ÔøΩ ÔøΩWrite Fox and suggest it. ÔøΩNot a bad idea at all.
>>
>> >> >> Suggest that they become a real news organization as well.
>>
>> >> >Says the person who takes political talking points from Rolling Stone
>> >> >magazine.
>>
>> ><< Just because you said so, doesn't mean that it's true.>>
>>
>> >OK. ÔøΩ Is this proof enough? ÔøΩ ÔøΩI especially like the THINK & LEARN
>> >part.
>>
>> >Newsgroups: alt.fan.howard-stern
>> >From: queenie <quee...@nospam.com>
>> >Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 15:47:38 -0400
>> >Local: Thurs, Oct 9 2008 3:47 pm
>> >Subject: Re: You can't handle the truth!
>>
>> >Silly me to think any Bushie, who has the attention span of a gnat,
>> >would want to read an informative article about the man who is
>> >running
>> >for President! ÔøΩThat certainly explains why you think McCain/Palin
>> >are
>> >a fit team to lead the country.
>>
>> >Just in case someone wants to THINK and LEARN, here is the link.
>>
>> >http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the...
>>
>> I thought that was an excellent article. ÔøΩAnd America agreed with me
>> and rejected team McCain/Palin.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>
>Judging from your posts, it makes sense that you get your political
>information from a rock & roll magazine.
I'm surprised it wasn't from JET magazine...
lab~rat >:-)
Biel" <Graa...@aol.com> puked:
>On Oct 15, 11:25ÔøΩam, L...@alot.com wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:59:07 -0400, "lab~rat ÔøΩ>:-)"
>>
>> <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>> >>Fortunately, I haven't reached that level of cynicism. ÔøΩI still
>> >>believe there are good elected officials and most of them are
>> >>Democrat.
>>
>> >Just for kicks, name some of your favorites. ÔøΩBesides JFK and Obama.
>>
>> Just for reality---the policies from FDR to Obama---and
>> the historical record of their accomplishments in
>> making the middle class and America what it is---would
>> seem to be more relevant.
>
>Jimmy Carter says "hi".
Not to mention, Obama's hurting the middle class more than anyone else
with his garbage including health care.
lab~rat >:-)
>On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:19:34 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)"
><ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>
>>I was really kidding when I said that, but I consider it a success to
>>make you call me a name...
>
>Calling someone what they are is bad to you?
Is that what you meant to type?
lab~rat >:-)
>On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:20:50 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)"
><ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>One would think the face evidence is overwhelming that
>>>he's right about McCain/Palin
>>>
>>>One wonders why you don't get it.
>>
>>As excited as it makes you to think about a guy named "queenie", she's
>>a she and she's a welfare grabber...
>
>She's in the wealth class---the ones who really, really
>made out since Reagan's era at the public trough?
Is that a question?
lab~rat >:-)
>On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 13:07:17 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)"
><ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>
>>>Jimmy Carter says "hi".
>>
>>Not to mention, Obama's hurting the middle class more than anyone else
>>with his garbage including health care.
>
>You think a fucking republican induced 5X increase in
>health care costs is a plus in your column?
>
>You're even goofier than you sound.
You think I'm here to defend Republicans?
lab~rat >:-)
>On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:46:35 -0700 (PDT), "The
>Greyhound & Jessica Biel" <Graa...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>>On Oct 15, 11:25ÔøΩam, L...@alot.com wrote:
>>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:59:07 -0400, "lab~rat ÔøΩ>:-)"
>>>
>>> <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>>> >>Fortunately, I haven't reached that level of cynicism. ÔøΩI still
>>> >>believe there are good elected officials and most of them are
>>> >>Democrat.
>>>
>>> >Just for kicks, name some of your favorites. ÔøΩBesides JFK and Obama.
>>>
>>> Just for reality---the policies from FDR to Obama---and
>>> the historical record of their accomplishments in
>>> making the middle class and America what it is---would
>>> seem to be more relevant.
>>
>>Jimmy Carter says "hi".
>
>Jimmy Carter wasn't hand-holding, kissing buddies with
>the Saudi Oil Cartel that placed an embargo on oil.
No, he was cowering under his desk from the Lybians.
>
>You probably remember who is....right?
Yeah, someone you guys can't go a day without thinking about.
queenie
Has been in office only nine months!
queenie
Biel" <Graa...@aol.com> wrote:
>On Oct 14, 7:03�pm, queenie <quee...@nospam.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:45:47 -0700 (PDT), "The Greyhound & Jessica
>>
>>
>> >Just in case someone wants to THINK and LEARN, here is the link.
>>
>> >http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/make_believe_maverick_the...
>>
>> I thought that was an excellent article. �And America agreed with me
>> and rejected team McCain/Palin.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>
>Judging from your posts, it makes sense that you get your political
>information from a rock & roll magazine.
You're a snob.
queenie
>On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:59:07 -0400, "lab~rat >:-)"
><ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>
>>>Fortunately, I haven't reached that level of cynicism. I still
>>>believe there are good elected officials and most of them are
>>>Democrat.
>>
>>Just for kicks, name some of your favorites. Besides JFK and Obama.
>
>Just for reality---the policies from FDR to Obama---and
>the historical record of their accomplishments in
>making the middle class and America what it is---would
>seem to be more relevant.
>
>Name anything that conservatism ever did to help
>America become better.
Yeah, what programs did the Republicans enact to help the middle-class
when they controlled all three branches of government?
queenie
>On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:46:35 -0700 (PDT), "The Greyhound & Jessica
>Biel" <Graa...@aol.com> puked:
>
>>On Oct 15, 11:25�am, L...@alot.com wrote:
>>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:59:07 -0400, "lab~rat �>:-)"
>>>
>>> <ch...@cheeze.net> wrote:
>>> >>Fortunately, I haven't reached that level of cynicism. �I still
>>> >>believe there are good elected officials and most of them are
>>> >>Democrat.
>>>
>>> >Just for kicks, name some of your favorites. �Besides JFK and Obama.
>>>
>>> Just for reality---the policies from FDR to Obama---and
>>> the historical record of their accomplishments in
>>> making the middle class and America what it is---would
>>> seem to be more relevant.
>>
>>Jimmy Carter says "hi".
>
>Not to mention, Obama's hurting the middle class more than anyone else
>with his garbage including health care.
I'll ask you again. What did the Republicans do to help the
middle-class? What did they do when Bush was president to help the
middle-class? We know they did nothing for the poor...remember
Katrina?
Rev. Dr. Ben Rand III, Esq, PhD
>
>You think a fucking republican induced 5X increase in
>health care costs is a plus in your column?
How about a 100%+ increase in costs due to the government being
incapable of running anything anything remotely like a business would,
plus my fucking taxes gonig up to pay for this fucked up idea.
IT DOESNT WORK WHERE ITS TRIED YOU MORON
How come our illustrious President doesn't know what a fucking P/E
ratio is?
The Greyhound & Jessica Biel
> the Saudi Oil Cartel that placed an embargo on oil.
>
No, instead Carter presided over the worst economic downturn since
World War II, doubling inflation while he was in office, with interest
rates at 20% & unemployment at 8%. Not to mention he allowed a bunch
of thugs to seize our embassy and our citizens, keeping them hostage
for 444 days.
Tell me you're not stupid enough to go to bat for Carter. You can't
be that dumb.
The Greyhound & Jessica Biel
<< Judging from the articles and beliefs of the rightwing limpballed
brain dolts here---all their information comes with rolls of ass-wipe
from town-hall. >>
Judging from your remark, I assume you write for Rolling Stone
magazine.
The Greyhound & Jessica Biel
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:51:35 -0400, Beam Me Up Scotty
>
>
>
>
>
>
It's almost 25% of his tenure. How long is all of this going to
take?
Beam Me Up Scotty
queenie
Give him eight years.
Demon Buddha
>> It's almost 25% of his tenure. How long is all of this going to
>> take?
>>
> At this rate.... a thousand years.
Feh. Bloody optimist.
Demon Buddha
> Give him eight years.
That, now, is a *riot*.
Demon Buddha
Well *that* sure showed him.
Great job.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
news:Xns9CA479985...@216.196.97.130:
> queenie <que...@nospam.com> wrote in
> news:05fbd5lunab1if4jk...@4ax.com:
>
>>
>> The TV networks are all pro-big business.
>
> But their editors and reporters are usually liberal.
>
Don't matter none. It's the boys that write the checks that run things.
Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS
> On Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:57:12 -0500, "RD (The Sandman)"
> <rdsandman(spamlock)@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>>>>Hell - there's lots of dissent but it's all on the internet. The TV
>>>>networks are all pro-bammer.
>>>
>>> The TV networks are all pro-big business.
>>
>>But their editors and reporters are usually liberal.
>
> Nonsense
>
> Most editorial boards aren't touched by managment.
>
> Legitimate news rooms simply would walk out.
>
>
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Give my regards to the Easter Bunny. HAHAHA
tankfixer
que...@nospam.com says...
>
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 23:21:55 -0500, "Speeders & Drunk Drivers are
> MURDERERS" <xeto...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >"Rev. Dr. Ben Rand III, Esq, PhD" <fi...@absolution.coim> wrote in
> >news:3g1ad5hljuk3cmkue...@4ax.com:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> We shall have no dissent at all, because dissent makes everyone angry
> >> and mean and not liking fluffy bunnies and wildlife.
> >>
> >
> >Hell - there's lots of dissent but it's all on the internet. The TV
> >networks are all pro-bammer.
>
> The TV networks are all pro-big business.
Backpeddle