Re: 'SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE' skit suggests Sarah's husband guilty of incest...

[tar~bal]

"Alric Knebel" <al...@cableone.net> wrote in message
news:gnqid4h4n9gjqlob9...@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 23:24:10 -0700 (PDT), Remysun
> <remys...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Sep 23, 12:26 am, "dave" <d...@fish.net> wrote:
>>
>>> To me, it suggested that the newsers don't care about truth; they only
>>> care
>>> about entertainment and propaganda.
>>
>>To me, they were making fun of liberalism, and the post-plagarism NY
>>Times.
>
> To me, they were making fun of NEWS, period. The accusations against
> all politicians all the time that put a story out, then stories that
> question the story, and on and on.
>
> I personally can't stand TV news anymore. CNN is downright fluffy. I
> only WISH it was liberal, so I can have somewhere to go to get the
> truth.

Interesting. So you've thought this through and not only are liberal news
sources the only truthful ones, but all liberal news sources are truthful.

Is that your final answer?

[tar~bal]

"Alric Knebel" <al...@cableone.net> wrote in message

news:c7rld4tbh0k8f54sd...@4ax.com...

> Are you saying liberal news sources CAN'T be truthful?

>
> Is that your final answer?

Answering a question with a question tells me more than you want me to know.

[Antonio E. Gonzalez]

It worked for Socrates . . . or Aristotle, one of those Greek guys
. . .

[KK]

Clay Aiken?

[tar~bal]

"Alric Knebel" <al...@cableone.net> wrote in message

news:vk0rd4ttpedv2enkv...@4ax.com...

> Your original comment was so stupid, I already knew what I needed to
> know.

Do you believe everything that you read from liberal news sources?