Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Watch Obama Surrender

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Not Defined

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 6:57:33 AM11/24/09
to
President Barack Obama is expected to address the nation Tuesday on his
new Afghanistan policy, likely in prime time.

MagneticEnergy

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 7:12:27 AM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 11:57 am, "Not Defined" <farce5...@newsrover.com> wrote:
> President Barack Obama is expected to address the nation Tuesday on his
> new Afghanistan policy, likely in prime time.

Yes, American wallets will surrender without objection, they are
making sure that the concept of having a pay check will be a novelty
of the past (already dreaming up more taxes)?

Now we understand why there was a "delay" they had to figure out what
the focus groups said about raising your taxes, and they had to figure
out what comes first, health care or war taxes?

In fact, the first national health care death panel for the United
States is testing its operational effectiveness next week by requiring
that US Citizens hold their breath during the speech while the word
"victory" is not heard?

America the Stupid

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 8:46:47 AM11/24/09
to

"Not Defined" <farc...@newsrover.com> wrote in message
news:xn0gi0wl...@news.albasani.net...

> President Barack Obama is expected to address the nation Tuesday on his
> new Afghanistan policy, likely in prime time.

Can your family foot the bill?


Kevin Cunningham

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 9:38:58 AM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 6:57 am, "Not Defined" <farce5...@newsrover.com> wrote:
> President Barack Obama is expected to address the nation Tuesday on his
> new Afghanistan policy, likely in prime time.

Will you be watching it with draft dodgers like the last
administration? Or like Rush the draft dodger? Will you have some
guests who voted against the military pay raise like Bush wanted? You
know that McCain voted against the very idea of paying our fighting
men and women more. Or will you have over some of the people who
defended the horrible treatment our wounded warriors got from the
Walter Reed?

What do you serve a group like that?

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

clouddreamer

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 4:00:34 PM11/24/09
to
DG wrote:

> "Not Defined" <farc...@newsrover.com> wrote:
>> President Barack Obama is expected to address the nation Tuesday on his
>> new Afghanistan policy, likely in prime time.
>
>
> That would be great! I would love if we got out of Afghanistan.
> Karzai is a puppet and not a very good one at that.
>
> Why were/are we pissing away our money there?


Ask Bush.

Try not to forget that Obama is trying to finish what Bush started and
fucked up royally.

..

pyjamarama

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 4:10:24 PM11/24/09
to
On Nov 24, 11:29 am, "Not Defined" <farce5...@newsrover.com> wrote:

> Kevin Cunningham wrote:
> > On Nov 24, 6:57 am, "Not Defined" <farce5...@newsrover.com> wrote:
> > > President Barack Obama is expected to address the nation Tuesday on
> > > his new Afghanistan policy, likely in prime time.
>
> > Will you be watching it with draft dodgers like the last
> > administration?  
>
> Did Obama serve?

If by "serve" you mean did he snort mountains of blow in college then
yes, he served.

> Did Biden?

Biden received a purple heart after undergoing multiple hair plug
transplants.

> Did Hillary?

Didn't you hear? Hillary's helicopter was fired upon when she was in
Bosnia...

Oh wait, that was discovered to have been a stone-cold, bald faced,
self-serving lie...

That's a habit she picked up from her adulterous husband.

Speaking of which, she did throw ashtrays at him after catching him
fucking somebody's daughter...

That's combat, in a way.

The Wiz

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 12:52:47 AM11/25/09
to
Not Defined wrote:
> President Barack Obama is expected to address the nation Tuesday on his
> new Afghanistan policy, likely in prime time.

He has a policy? Other than socialism?

Not Sure

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 1:15:11 AM11/25/09
to
On Nov 24, 1:00 pm, clouddreamer <savethepla...@save.money.too> wrote:
> DG wrote:

> > "Not Defined" <farce5...@newsrover.com> wrote:
> >> President Barack Obama is expected to address the nation Tuesday on his
> >> new Afghanistan policy, likely in prime time.
>
> > That would be great!  I would love if we got out of Afghanistan.
> > Karzai is a puppet and not a very good one at that.  
>
> > Why were/are we pissing away our money there?
>
> Ask Bush.

Why? Going to give him credit for starting the war you're on record as
supporting? LOL, try not fucking up like this in the future, lardass.

lab~rat >:-)

unread,
Nov 25, 2009, 8:22:28 AM11/25/09
to
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:29:24 +0000 (UTC), "Not Defined"
<farc...@newsrover.com> puked:

>Kevin Cunningham wrote:


>> On Nov 24, 6:57ÔøΩam, "Not Defined" <farce5...@newsrover.com> wrote:
>> > President Barack Obama is expected to address the nation Tuesday on
>> > his new Afghanistan policy, likely in prime time.
>>
>> Will you be watching it with draft dodgers like the last
>> administration?
>

>Did Obama serve? Did Biden? Did Hillary?

Obviously not, otherwise they'd understand the urgency of strategic
decisions...
--
lab~rat >:-)
Do you want polite or do you want sincere?

Dano

unread,
Nov 27, 2009, 9:45:55 PM11/27/09
to

"pyjamarama" <pyjama...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:ef827074-9365-4ff1...@u8g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

> Did Biden?

> Did Hillary?

------------------------------------------------------
Closer than those great chickenhawks Bush & Cheney ever got at any rate.
Real good at sending others to die though. You too.


"the better Slobodan"

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 3:55:51 AM11/28/09
to
On Nov 27, 8:45 pm, "Dano" <janeandd...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "pyjamarama" <pyjamaram...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

+
Obama is going to tell us Tuesday night that he have to use our Bank
of
China credit card for the next 30,000 troops going to Afghanistan.
He will say that only the House healthcare coverage scheme can be
fully financed by our tax dollars in the coming year.

The number one Dan in the land
+

Ubiquitous

unread,
Nov 28, 2009, 8:24:32 AM11/28/09
to
On Nov 24, 4:00 pm, clouddreamer <savethepla...@save.money.too> wrote:

> Try not to forget that Obama is trying to finish what Bush started and
> fucked up royally.

Well, there yuo go trying to blame Bush for all of Obama's fuck-ups
again!

I am waiting for you to blame Bush for the recent revelations that
"global warming" is a hoax.

--
It is simply breathtaking to watch the glee and abandon with which
the liberal media and the Angry Left have been attempting to turn
our military victory in Iraq into a second Vietnam quagmire. Too bad
for them, it's failing.


Oberon

unread,
Nov 29, 2009, 10:11:08 PM11/29/09
to
On Nov 28, 5:24 am, Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 4:00 pm, clouddreamer <savethepla...@save.money.too> wrote:
>
> > Try not to forget that Obama is trying to finish what Bush started and
> > fucked up royally.
>
> Well, there yuo go trying to blame Bush for all of Obama's fuck-ups
> again!
>

You probably blamed Bill Clinton for all of Bush's fuck-ups, which
number a hell of a lot more than Obama has.

Message has been deleted

Slobodan Milosevic

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 1:21:37 PM12/8/09
to
On Nov 24, 3:00 pm, clouddreamer <savethepla...@save.money.too> wrote:
> DG wrote:
+
Coldreamer

You Fucking Idiot

What happened to you saying that president Obama has started a war
that Bush has started? I do not think
so, buddy. We have been giving them money there, the president has
been ignorant lately here. He saying that we
need to bring the troops home. I hope he goes back to Africa and
live with the kaffirs over there and see how he
likes it in the Cape. Right now the reason is that since Barack
Obama took office, he is the fuck responible
for sending our troops to die and not making it home to the states
to see their familes and childern. But the
reason is Since Obama took office he is not helping our troops, and
he is sending thrm off to die.  ..

Dan aka Slobodan Milosevic
+


Dano

unread,
Dec 8, 2009, 10:04:33 PM12/8/09
to

"Slobodan Milosevic" <danma...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b67e33e7-4d7d-4c64...@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com...


You Fucking Idiot

What happened to you saying that president Obama has started a war
that Bush has started? I do not think
so, buddy. We have been giving them money there, the president has
been ignorant lately here. He saying that we
need to bring the troops home. I hope he goes back to Africa and
live with the kaffirs over there and see how he
likes it in the Cape. Right now the reason is that since Barack
Obama took office, he is the fuck responible
for sending our troops to die and not making it home to the states
to see their familes and childern. But the
reason is Since Obama took office he is not helping our troops, and
he is sending thrm off to die. ..

Dan aka Slobodan Milosevic
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
You sound like a very ignorant person.

Thanks for that thoughtless contribution. I wouldn't expect anything less
from a dimwit like you. Goodbye now.

Bill Steele

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 2:37:59 PM12/9/09
to
In article
<b67e33e7-4d7d-4c64...@b15g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
Slobodan Milosevic <danma...@yahoo.com> wrote:

The middle east has the oil. For now we need it. Obama is working to
find alternatives to oil. Jimmy Carter did the same thing, but the oil
propaganda machine pushed him out and we went back to oil. Now they're
trying to do the same thing again. If they can push Obama out we go back
to oil, oil, nothing but oil, and more troops will die. Is that what
you want?

KK

unread,
Dec 9, 2009, 3:42:42 PM12/9/09
to
On Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:37:59 -0500, Bill Steele wrote:

> The middle east has the oil. For now we need it. Obama is working to
> find alternatives to oil. Jimmy Carter did the same thing, but the oil
> propaganda machine pushed him out and we went back to oil.

There's no realistic, large-scale alternative to oil other than nuclear.
And it's not "the oil propagnda machine" that rips on nukes.

0 new messages