Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

New Five-0 Series

10 views
Skip to first unread message

msfabulousaloha

unread,
May 24, 2010, 7:26:00 AM5/24/10
to
Hmmm, not too sure how I feel about them remaking the classic. I've
seen ads for it already. I do like the idea of a woman in the mix
(Kona instead of Kono), but I've also seen a clip of McGarrett saying
"Book 'em Danno", and it wasn't Jack Lord saying it, nor James
MacArthur hearing it! It didn't look or sound right at all. I'm not
sure any other actor will ever be able to say that line like Jack did.
It was his signature, after all. It's like someone else trying to sing
Sinatra or something--it's just not the same.

I'm withholding judgment on whether or not I'll like the series, of
course, and I'm tickled that I'll be able to see beautiful Hawaii
every week again (all those great location shots on the original made
me fall in love with it, as they did for all of us, I'm sure), and I
like the group they've assembled for the cast (all great-looking,
lol!), so we'll see....

Keltec

unread,
May 31, 2010, 8:59:45 PM5/31/10
to
I agree ... that's why, and how I know it will fall flt on its face
like every other cheesy attempt to cash in on past glory. Just shows
you how desperate the television industry is to retain its ever-
dwindling audience. They're even remaking The Rockford Files.
Naturally I predict the same fate for it no matter how well produced
it is, for even in Hollywood, brainfarts emit an odor all their own.

Brian

unread,
May 31, 2010, 11:06:45 PM5/31/10
to

The Rockford files project has been dropped at least for now.

I remember Monte Markham as Perry Mason. Just didn't seem the same.

Keltec

unread,
Jun 11, 2010, 10:02:00 AM6/11/10
to
> The Rockford files project has been dropped at least for now.

I didn't know the pulled the plug on that one, but it's just as well.

> I remember Monte Markham as Perry Mason. Just didn't seem the same.

I saw a few clips of the new H50. Lots of car crashes. explosions and
insignificant faces.

In other words, it's no different than any other action show on TV
today, and we know how long they last.

Brian

unread,
Jun 11, 2010, 11:17:58 PM6/11/10
to
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 07:02:00 -0700 (PDT), Keltec
<deniz...@yahoo.com> wrote:


>I saw a few clips of the new H50. Lots of car crashes. explosions and
>insignificant faces.
>
>In other words, it's no different than any other action show on TV
>today, and we know how long they last.

I'll watch it at first to see but it doesn't sound too promising if
that is what it will be.

Wiseguy

unread,
Jun 11, 2010, 11:48:52 PM6/11/10
to
Brian <drmorri...@comcast.net> wrote in
news:n1v516hpvk4v8iqq7...@4ax.com:

Of course, if they show a few clips they will show car crashes, etc.
What does insignificant faces mean?

Like other remakes/reboots it will be geared to today's audience.
People will complain if it's too similar to the original.
People will complain if it's too different from the original.
Those people who remember the original.
Those people who are not necessarily the main target.

I will celebrate the new series by buying the original on DVD.
But I will watch the new one as well. I hope it does well.

Keltec

unread,
Jun 12, 2010, 9:46:28 AM6/12/10
to
> Like other remakes/reboots it will be geared to today's audience. �
> People will complain if it's too similar to the original.
> People will complain if it's too different from the original.
> Those people who remember the original.
> Those people who are not necessarily the main target.

You're right ... and that's precisely why it will fail like all the
others. True, it may click with a new generation of garden vegetables,
but I'll be surprised if this one lasts a full season before the
studio decides the expense to produce it just ain't worth it.

Brian

unread,
Jun 12, 2010, 8:57:25 PM6/12/10
to
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 06:46:28 -0700 (PDT), Keltec
<deniz...@yahoo.com> wrote:


>You're right ... and that's precisely why it will fail like all the
>others. True, it may click with a new generation of garden vegetables,
>but I'll be surprised if this one lasts a full season before the
>studio decides the expense to produce it just ain't worth it.

Have any TV re-makes been successful as TV shows?

Wiseguy

unread,
Jun 12, 2010, 9:33:42 PM6/12/10
to
Brian <drmorri...@comcast.net> wrote in
news:d6b8169k61qe46q4g...@4ax.com:

Complete remakes or continuations?

Continuations include
Dragnet 1967 (4 years, original 8 years)
Star Trek The Next Generation (7 years, original 3 years)


How long does it have to be on to be successful?

Mission: Impossible (2 years, original 7 years)

Remake:

Battlestar Galactica (4 years, original 2 years counting a continuation)
V (2 years so far, original 2 miniseries and series 1 year)

msfabulousaloha

unread,
Jun 13, 2010, 5:27:58 AM6/13/10
to
Well, I've seen a lengthy trailer for the new series. You can access
it at: http://www.cbs.com/primetime/hawaii_five_o/video/ . It's nearly
4 minutes long, and gives quite a bit of background on the characters.
The pilot seems to focus primarily on how the team met and got
together. In the opening, McGarrett is apparently in the Navy (which
the original was too) and is ferrying a bad guy somewhere. The bad
guy's brother lets McG know he has his (McG's) father and will kill
him if he doesn't release his brother...Well, you know how that works
out. In the original, however, McG's father died when he was just 12
years old. I know this is a new generation, but us oldy afficionados
remember the details!

Also, I noticed that even tho Kono is now a woman, her name is still
Kono, and not the feminine Kona. Interesting, I thought. And Danny is
not a local, tho he was on the original, and doesn't like beaches.
Anyway, they've totally made up new lives and backgrounds for the
characters, which I guess is okay since they're updating the series,
but...they're messing with a classic, and I just can't get my head
around it. Sigh...I dunno.

Brian

unread,
Jun 13, 2010, 7:48:51 PM6/13/10
to
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 01:33:42 GMT, Wiseguy <epw...@yahoo.com> wrote:


>Complete remakes or continuations?
>
>Continuations include
>Dragnet 1967 (4 years, original 8 years)
>Star Trek The Next Generation (7 years, original 3 years)
>

I always considered the Star Trek programs to be continuations of
basically the same show.


>
>How long does it have to be on to be successful?
>
>Mission: Impossible (2 years, original 7 years)

I don't even remember the re-make.

Wiseguy

unread,
May 18, 2012, 5:14:55 PM5/18/12
to
Keltec <deniz...@yahoo.com> wrote in news:9e4de29d-5058-48f5-9e62-
77ced9...@a30g2000yqn.googlegroups.com:

>> Like other remakes/reboots it will be geared to today's audience. ï¿
> ½
>> People will complain if it's too similar to the original.
>> People will complain if it's too different from the original.
>> Those people who remember the original.
>> Those people who are not necessarily the main target.
>
> You're right ... and that's precisely why it will fail like all the
> others. True, it may click with a new generation of garden vegetables,
> but I'll be surprised if this one lasts a full season before the
> studio decides the expense to produce it just ain't worth it.

Renewed for third season!

Darth Dionysus

unread,
May 18, 2012, 5:28:39 PM5/18/12
to
I personally think they have done a remarkiable job so far. I was a little
dissapointed with the "cliffhanger" approach this season (getting tired of
end-of-season cliffhangers in general), but all in all I think the dynamics
are very good.
0 new messages