Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

PMS Takes Control

4 views
Skip to first unread message

ResearcherGuy

unread,
Sep 8, 2005, 7:44:12 PM9/8/05
to
PMS has taken over the CEO position of
Dr. Gene Scott Inc. (California Corporation
#C1288060) per its latest Statement of Officers,
dated 8/17/2005. Loyalist Brad Tubin is the
Secretary and Gary Crane is the CFO.
Agent for Service of Process is Patricia Glaser.
PMS continues to also hold the CEO slot at
Dolores Press (CA Corporation #C0315389).

On the 8/2005 filing, the business of
"Dr Gene Scott Inc." is listed as "Investments."
(Hmmm -- Wasn't it supposed to be for gifts
devoted to supporting the word of the Lord?
Somehow someone may have mistaken it for that).

One such investment owned by Dr. Gene Scott Inc.,
is the lakeside house in Hamilton Branch, on the
NorthEastern shore of Lake Almanor just off Hwy 147 in
the Northern Sierra Nevada Mountains.
The house at 3644 Lake Almanor Drive has a redwood
deck overlooking the lake, a boat ramp and private dock.
Nice. There's also a trailer in front (staff??).

It's a couple of blocks away, from the site where
Gene's parents William Theodore Scott and Inez
Leona Scott used to live, at 3567 Evergreen Circle
(maybe where Scott's staff was sheltered in the
late 1970's to avoid service of FCC depositions)?
That cabin burnt down, and the property was later sold
on 3-12-1990.

It's a few miles away from the "Willits Ranch"
located at 4523 Nelson St in Taylorsville, and
over an hour's drive from the Wescott Church
at 1400 Grand Avenue in Thermalito (West of
Oroville).

Gene Scott transferred as a "gift" his interest to
a joint tenancy with Melissa on 9-20-2004 (Recorded as
Plumas County Document #2004-0009981), and Melissa
had Bradley Dale Tubin (California Notary Public
#1420046) ratify her sole possession, through
recordation of Gene's Death Certificate in Plumas
County on 8-1-2005 (Document #2005-0007862).
Now Melissa owns the lakefront house outright.
Wonder, what she'll do with it -- Conduct prayer
services there??

However, no such change of status has been submitted,
for the religious entities of Wescott Christian Church
(CA Corp #C0454580) and Faith Center (CA Corp #C0218427).
PMS (aka Melissa Pastore) is still listed as Secretary.

Strange -- Could it be the churches don't control the
money, that the other corporations do? How else can
this be explained, in a spiritual sense?

gmartinz

unread,
Sep 8, 2005, 8:58:28 PM9/8/05
to
researcher guy! researcher guy! researcher guy!

(the cheerleaders always cheer you onto the field)

madei...@hotmail.com

unread,
Sep 9, 2005, 7:01:38 AM9/9/05
to
It's a couple of blocks away, from the site where
Gene's parents William Theodore Scott and Inez
Leona Scott used to live, at 3567 Evergreen Circle
(maybe where Scott's staff was sheltered in the
late 1970's to avoid service of FCC depositions)?
That cabin burnt down, and the property was later sold
on 3-12-1990.

I remember when this cabin burned down. Scott make a huge deal about
how the devil had attacked and he swore that he would rebuild the cabin
exactly like it had been to stick it in the eye of the devil. He raised
money (imagine that) to rebuild the cabin. Now we hear that it was sold
and never rebuilt.

Lies, lies....all lies

matt2442

unread,
Sep 9, 2005, 11:20:21 AM9/9/05
to
madeinusa61:

He raised money (imagine that) to rebuild the cabin. Now we hear that it
was sold and never rebuilt.

matt2442:
He actually raised money from the church to rebuild his parents home?
Whether he actually did rebuild it or not, he should not have the church
members paying for it. If he raised money for it, and never rebuilt it,
that's another issue.

gypsi...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 9, 2005, 1:33:04 PM9/9/05
to
matt, I don't think he raised money for that one, the insurance co.
rebuilt it. I recall seeing videos of the new structure. Of course, he
could have presented videos of the other Lake Almanor property and done
a classic scott bait and switch. Mrs. doc had a Lake Almanor property
on the real estate market this year, anyone know if it sold?

But now that we may have a few dots to connect of current events....
does anyone else remember Mrs. doc muti-seven finger salute a few weeks
ago? Could this be one of the dots? Now Mrs. doc announces that she is
'moving'? From the parsonage? She is also finishing up 'all' baptisms
(cleaning up loose ends?) mebbe for a new pastor to step in while she
controls the investment entity?

Anyone remember current dots that may fit here?

gypsie

dear...@yahoo.com

unread,
Sep 9, 2005, 7:48:10 PM9/9/05
to
Gypsie:

re: Anyone remember current dots that may fit here?

reply: per RG:Gene Scott transferred as a "gift" his interest to
a joint tenancy with Melissa on 9-20-2004..hmmm..around the
time he went public with the "new" cancer??...is that a dot?

re: Mrs. doc muti-seven finger salute a few weeks ago?


Could this be one of the dots? Now Mrs. doc announces that she is

'moving'? From the parsonage? Again per RG:PMS has taken over the
CEO of Dr. Gene Scott Inc.position per its latest Statement of
Officers,
dated 8/17/2005.

Does this mean the Will has been probated or completed (or whatever
the legal term is) and the results now set in stone and filed with the
state??
So now she can..(dot..dot)..make a dash for it? Perhaps her moving
from the
parsonage had to do with a provision of the Will??...dot?

If the Will is made a matter of Public Records, I'll bet All the dots
will be connected...boy, I wish RG could get a copy of that!!!!

As I've previously stated I believe PMS is only there doing her little
teachings and preachings as the Will's stipulations forces her to do
so, in order to control all the "ministries monies" and "management".

Elmer Fudd

unread,
Sep 9, 2005, 8:01:35 PM9/9/05
to
Brad is secretary?...Lord help us!...LOL

Where is Suzanne anyhow?


"ResearcherGuy" <worldthun...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1126223052....@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

suse...@hotmail.com

unread,
Sep 9, 2005, 9:15:13 PM9/9/05
to
the last time i heard from suzanne was here at afgs sometime in the
early 90s.

sb

damnthetorpedos

unread,
Sep 9, 2005, 10:24:19 PM9/9/05
to
Matt, read Mrs. Doc's lips.
THERE ARE NO CHURCH MEMBERS.

Only gullible idiots. They sent Gene Scott
checks payable to him knowing he'd use it
for whatever he wanted. And he did.

damnthetorpedos

unread,
Sep 9, 2005, 10:27:25 PM9/9/05
to
Face the reality. The "churches" are
a shell hiding from the government.
The "corporations" are a thin veil.
The "officers" and "board" are rubber
stamp puppets, that is, if they want
their bills or salaries paid and
the pastor's good grace to get them
into heaven.

IT'S ALL A FRAUD. F-R-A-U-D. AKA
SCAM AKA HOAX AKA SCHEME AKA

PRIVATE BUSINESS OWNED AND CONTROLLED
BY MELISSA SCOTT.

gypsi...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 9, 2005, 10:47:21 PM9/9/05
to
How about another dot? Mrs. doc pulls the archives/teaching tapes to
hold as hostage so she could use them as a bargaining chip to get what
she wants. Everyone knows that doc's teaching is paramount. The most
important thing to keep going and she has consistently pared it away.

Sounds like her mega-fuck you a few weeks ago relates to her CEO
standing in Dr. Gene Scott Inc. and if you look at the other players
involved in DGS Inc. well it fits?

gypsie

prettykitty

unread,
Sep 9, 2005, 10:59:16 PM9/9/05
to
gypsie wrote:

gypsie

prettykitty wrote:

Gypsie girl...you hit the nail on the head!!


dear...@yahoo.com

unread,
Sep 10, 2005, 12:26:35 AM9/10/05
to
Gypsie,

re: Mrs. doc pulls the archives/teaching tapes to


hold as hostage so she could use them as a bargaining chip to get what
she wants.

reply: I've got a question for the legal eagles out there. O.k. so at
the end of
Doc's services and festivals a copywrite claim pops up stating that Dr.
Gene
Scott, Inc. claims the copywrite. Yet, about a week or so after Doc
died
PMS goes on air and verbally claims them as hers thru inheritance. She
then
takes the videos off his website and continues to sell them thru
Delores Press.

It would seem to me that she became CEO of DGS, Inc, as soon as it was
legal to do so. This was on 8-17-2005. Wouldn't that mean that the
Inc. along
with all it's holdings was tied up in Probate until August of this
year? Sooooo,
how could she legally have claimed all the "rights" 8 months ago?

Could Doc have legally given her a "gift" of the "rights" or property
that belonged to the Inc., What if there were lawsuites against the
Inc. Knowing he was dying, wouldn't that be like knowing your business
is going belly up, and getting rid of assets before you file the
bankruptcy? Isn't that a form of fraud?

If you were to file a claim against Dr. Gene Scott, Inc. and could
prove he knew he
was dying, could you seize (sp?) or freeze all assets he "gave" away 6
months before his
death?

(I gotta stop pondering these things.)

emptyredseat

unread,
Sep 10, 2005, 12:48:35 AM9/10/05
to
one reason there becomes a c.e.o. is because of losing money and
reorganization.
I thought that Gene Scott had a lady attorney that was his c.e.o,or close
to it. I think mel wants a salary.

matt2442

unread,
Sep 10, 2005, 1:56:52 AM9/10/05
to
DTT:

Matt, read Mrs. Doc's lips.
THERE ARE NO CHURCH MEMBERS.

matt2442:
Of course. I forgot.

Emmett

unread,
Sep 10, 2005, 10:04:01 PM9/10/05
to

Emmett writes:
It would depend on the value placed on the gifts. You can
give a gift of, I think, $11,000.00 free of tax. Anything
over that is taxable. Now this is person to person like parents to
children etc. I don't think a corp. can give tax free gifts unless
it is to charity.
Now placing the value of the tapes and teachings would be a problem.
Some might place a high value for content and ability to make money
by selling them. If I was called into court I would say the tapes
and the teachings aren't worth a shit. They could probably use me for
their defense. :)

gypsi...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 10, 2005, 11:59:26 PM9/10/05
to
DGS Inc. would not own the copyrights, that would probably be Wescott
Inc. (the 'church corporation).

dear...@yahoo.com

unread,
Sep 11, 2005, 12:25:23 AM9/11/05
to
Gypsie,

re:DGS Inc. would not own the copyrights, that would probably be


Wescott
Inc. (the 'church corporation).

Reply: Doesn't "Dr. Gene Scott, Inc
Copywrite" appear at the end of all
the "shows"?

Her status with Wescott, Inc is still
that of Secretary (per RG). Yet she
claims to have inherited the "rights"...

Also regarding the Lake Amador property,
"Joint tendency" by an Inc.and an individual?? uhm....which means her
name was already on the property? PMS was living with a Corp. who quick
claim deeded the property to her???

Nah, it couldn't have already been in Gene
Scott's name, minus the Inc. He said he didn't own anything...He
wouldn't lie about
something like that.

gypsi...@gmail.com

unread,
Sep 11, 2005, 12:56:35 AM9/11/05
to
dear, I never noticed the copyright on the programming. It used to be
copyrighted to W. euGene Scott PhD or Dr. Gene Scott + the year (at
that time doc owned his copyrights, not a corporation). I'll have to
look closer next time. Very interesting question, especially if DGS,
Inc is for 'investments' as stated in the new corp documents.

With re the deed, dunno about this one. But, I remember when Christine
deeded off the SOR property, it was deeded from a person to a
corporation. Where did you get info re this deed?

gypsie

dear...@yahoo.com

unread,
Sep 11, 2005, 1:11:49 AM9/11/05
to
Gypsie,

re: Where did you get info re this deed?

reply: er..I asumed (ha, left out an s) That's what my first
husband and I did with our first house, we had "joint tendency".
He just signed off his rights on a quick claim deed to me.
(in the mid 1980's)

In fact, my bro-in-law obtained property where no money
was involved and the owner (not related) just gave him a
quick claim deed to file. That was in the 1980's too, maybe
things have changed.

dear...@yahoo.com

unread,
Sep 11, 2005, 1:18:30 AM9/11/05
to
Gypsie:

Just googled Quick Claim Deed. (if that's what they did)

FIRST, THE BASICS: A quitclaim deed is sometimes called a quick claim
deed, however quitclaim is the correct name. The quitclaim deed is an
instrument that conveys all ownership rights to another co-owner of a
property without guarantees. Quitclaim deeds are commonly used by
married people seeking a divorce. Usually one spouse signs all his/her
rights to the real estate over to the other. Please understand that
this device conveys ownership rights only and will NOT end an
obligation to re-pay a loan.

A quitclaim deed conveys to the grantee all of the legal or equitable
rights the grantor has in the property that existed at the time of the
conveyance.

Grantor - The person or entity that owns the property and executes the
deed conveying the property to another person or entity.
Grantee - The person or entity than receives title to the property.
Most legal documents like a quitclaim deed must be recorded to be valid

wakemansbud

unread,
Sep 11, 2005, 1:41:06 AM9/11/05
to
/ Mrs Scot says it all belonges to the
Lord anyways so it matters not/
Say no more./ Pastor is God's man

or woman in God's house.//

dear...@yahoo.com

unread,
Sep 11, 2005, 2:01:30 AM9/11/05
to
WB,

Sorry, if it bothers you. I was just curious. What I found out was
that any property, real, stock shares, ect, when held in joint tenancy
(Ah, I spelled it write this time..tenancy) and the spouse dies the
surviving "tenant" pays inheirtance taxes on 1/2 of the value of
said property. But if property is quitclaimed to other owner without
monetary gain before death...er...no inheirtance taxes????
(gawd, I do love google...)

I didn't have to pay taxes on my property that was quitclaim deeded
to me. I didn't have to pay taxes when I sold it also, 'Cos I bought
another house immediately.

0 new messages