Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

AFF is Number One...

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Xydexx Squeakypony

unread,
Apr 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/5/99
to
Just a quick note, for those of us keeping score at home: alt.fan.furry now
ranks as the number one newsgroup to talk about zoophi1ia, and holds second
place for relevance to bestia1ity.

____________________________________________________________
Xydexx Squeakypony [ICQ: 7569393]
Xydexx's Anthrofurry Homepage:
http://www.smart.net/~xydexx/anthrofurry/homepage.htm

-----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==----------
http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

DawnWolf

unread,
Apr 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/5/99
to
Xydexx Squeakypony <xyd...@my-dejanews.com> wrote:

>Just a quick note, for those of us keeping score at home: alt.fan.furry now
>ranks as the number one newsgroup to talk about zoophi1ia, and holds second
>place for relevance to bestia1ity.

Does it matter? In any way, shape or form? I really start wondering
lately ... after all, this is only the OL world, and nothing's truly
real on here. So what, I think. I've got a killfile, and an "ignore
thread" button. Works wonders :o)

DawnWolf


Xydexx Squeakypony

unread,
Apr 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM4/5/99
to
DawnWolf wrote:

> Xydexx Squeakypony wrote:
> >Just a quick note, for those of us keeping score at home: alt.fan.furry now
> >ranks as the number one newsgroup to talk about zoophi1ia, and holds second
> >place for relevance to bestia1ity.
>
> Does it matter? In any way, shape or form?

It depends on who you ask, I think. I've always found it a bit ironic how
some people complain about furry fandom being linked to bestia1ity or some
other kinks from an offhand reference in a magazine, and think nothing at all
of making hundreds of references to it on Usenet. It just seems a little
inconsistent.

For a fandom that claims to have nothing to do with bestia1ity we sure do talk
about it an awful lot, don't we?

The reasons behind this are along the lines of "these things need to be
brought out into the open so we can do something about them". In truth, all
its really accomplished is to have a different group of furry fans bringing
bestia1ity into the spotlight where the media can latch on to it.

IMHO, having the media latch onto bestia1ity is not a good way to improve
furry fandom's image.

______________________________________________________________________
Xydexx Squeakypony, not a Burned Fur [ICQ: 7569393]

0 new messages