Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Co de Kloet's interview with Mark Volman

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Charles Ulrich

unread,
Nov 21, 2005, 12:08:40 AM11/21/05
to
Does anyone know the exact recording date or broadcast date of Co de
Kloet's 1993 interview with Mark Volman (transcribed at
<http://www.lukpac.org/~handmade/patio/misc/interview2.html>)?

Also, how should I refer to the radio station?

--Charles

tactic

unread,
Nov 21, 2005, 5:00:42 AM11/21/05
to
think it was september 18
not sure it was 93 though

co recorded for VPRO radio
or for radio 4fm/nps

--
http://tinyurl.com/4s74f
http://tinyurl.com/7eq8n
"Charles Ulrich" <ulr...@sfu.ca> schreef in bericht
news:ulrich-F7D858.21082520112005@shawnews...

tactic

unread,
Nov 21, 2005, 5:06:08 AM11/21/05
to
correction on that
my cassette cover says
vpro 6-12-1993

somewhere else it says 6-12-96

yellow shark was aired 18/9/92

a hell i don't remember

mail Co and ask him

this is the site
http://www.omroep.nl/nps/output/4fm.html

--
http://tinyurl.com/4s74f
http://tinyurl.com/7eq8n
"Charles Ulrich" <ulr...@sfu.ca> schreef in bericht
news:ulrich-F7D858.21082520112005@shawnews...

Bill

unread,
Nov 21, 2005, 7:10:27 AM11/21/05
to
In article <dls6ah$hl7$1...@news3.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>,
"tactic" <390...@4987909.cm> wrote:

> correction on that
> my cassette cover says
> vpro 6-12-1993
>
> somewhere else it says 6-12-96
>
> yellow shark was aired 18/9/92
>
> a hell i don't remember
>
> mail Co and ask him
>
> this is the site
> http://www.omroep.nl/nps/output/4fm.html

I'm guessing that it was played on 6-12-93, See also following comment
on web page -
[TAL: That's Mark alright, with Co de Kloet, in the Fall of 1993. It
was part of the FZ Memorial program, Supplement, December 93. You can
find lots of audio from these interviews over at Co's website,
www.nps.nl/4fm.]
but not recorded on that date, since there are no 'I miss Frank'
comments one would expect.

tactic

unread,
Nov 21, 2005, 7:12:11 AM11/21/05
to
i believe that this is true
6/12/93

"Bill" <spam...@verizon.net> schreef in bericht
news:spamblock-F7A62...@news.verizon.net...

tactic

unread,
Nov 21, 2005, 7:18:05 AM11/21/05
to
radio 4
NOS
'nieuwe maandag'

a=the station
b=the broadcaster
c=the program title

date 6/12/93

"Bill" <spam...@verizon.net> schreef in bericht
news:spamblock-F7A62...@news.verizon.net...

tactic

unread,
Nov 21, 2005, 8:39:47 AM11/21/05
to
the host of the memorial show says:

first interview was made in '90 NYC with mark and howie,

second interview(the one about PlaygrPsyc) was made "two months ago" in
sproutin wings LA,...so that would be oktober '93

"Charles Ulrich" <ulr...@sfu.ca> schreef in bericht
news:ulrich-F7D858.21082520112005@shawnews...

Charles Ulrich

unread,
Nov 21, 2005, 12:28:41 PM11/21/05
to
In article <dlse21$251$1...@news4.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>,
"tactic" <390...@4987909.cm> wrote:

> radio 4
> NOS
> 'nieuwe maandag'
>
> a=the station
> b=the broadcaster
> c=the program title
>
> date 6/12/93

Thanks for the information.

So was "Supplement" not the title of Co de Kloet's program? Or was this
interview broadcast on a different program?

Do you feel that it's necessary to cite both the station and the
broadcaster? If not, which one should I cite?

--Charles

tactic

unread,
Nov 21, 2005, 12:40:02 PM11/21/05
to
many broadcasters cast broad on radio 4
i think this has been explained before

"Charles Ulrich" <ulr...@sfu.ca> schreef in bericht

news:ulrich-15C9B5.09283921112005@shawnews...


> In article <dlse21$251$1...@news4.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>,
> "tactic" <390...@4987909.cm> wrote:
>
> > radio 4
> > NOS
> > 'nieuwe maandag'
> >
> > a=the station
> > b=the broadcaster
> > c=the program title
> >
> > date 6/12/93
>
> Thanks for the information.
>
> So was "Supplement" not the title of Co de Kloet's program? Or was this
> interview broadcast on a different program?

it was

>
> Do you feel that it's necessary to cite both the station and the
> broadcaster?

yes
cite
"radio4, NOS, nieuwe maandag"

Charles Ulrich

unread,
Nov 21, 2005, 2:50:13 PM11/21/05
to
In article <dlt0th$fdq$1...@news2.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>,
"tactic" <390...@4987909.cm> wrote:

> many broadcasters cast broad on radio 4
> i think this has been explained before

It was indeed. I remembered the explanation of the situation, but not
the advice about what to cite. Looking back, I see that Desaab
recommended citing both the broadcaster and the station, as you have.

> > Do you feel that it's necessary to cite both the station and the
> > broadcaster?
>
> yes
> cite
> "radio4, NOS, nieuwe maandag"

Thanks for your help.

--Charles

tactic

unread,
Nov 21, 2005, 6:33:07 PM11/21/05
to
y w

--
http://tinyurl.com/4s74f
http://tinyurl.com/7eq8n
"Charles Ulrich" <ulr...@sfu.ca> schreef in bericht

news:ulrich-2F4642.11500921112005@shawnews...

hans hendriks

unread,
Nov 27, 2005, 1:14:40 PM11/27/05
to
In article <ulrich-15C9B5.09283921112005@shawnews>,
Charles Ulrich <ulr...@sfu.ca> wrote:

> In article <dlse21$251$1...@news4.zwoll1.ov.home.nl>,
> "tactic" <390...@4987909.cm> wrote:
>
> > radio 4
> > NOS
> > 'nieuwe maandag'
> >
> > a=the station
> > b=the broadcaster
> > c=the program title
> >
> > date 6/12/93
>
> Thanks for the information.
>
> So was "Supplement" not the title of Co de Kloet's program? Or was this
> interview broadcast on a different program?
>

Supplement was indeed another program title. Co de Kloet made many
different programs over the years with one thing in common, a lot of
attention for all things Zappa.

hanzo

0 new messages