Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Tweet - another one bites the dust

0 views
Skip to first unread message

John Dean

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 7:43:27 PM11/5/09
to
A women tweets "I'm in a board meeting. Having a miscarriage. Thank
goodness, because there's a fucked-up three-week hoop-jump to have an
abortion in Wisconsin."

http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/nov/06/penelope-trunk-tweet-miscarriage

And no-one on the board meeting asks "Why are you using your phone when
we're having an important discussion?"?
--
John Dean
Oxford


Boron Elgar

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 8:33:53 PM11/5/09
to
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:43:27 -0000, "John Dean"
<john...@fraglineone.net> wrote:

>
>And no-one on the board meeting asks "Why are you using your phone when
>we're having an important discussion?"?

If one is polite, one keeps one's tweeting, texting and emailing under
cover. People sit around the table at meetings and they all have
Blackberries or smart phones in their laps and are carrying on
conversations like crazy. I swear to the Goddess, though, you look
down the table and it appears as if everyone in the room is beating
off.

I always have a Flip video camera with me, and it is only because I
don't want to lose every single client that I haven't taped one of
these circle jerks and posted it on youtube.

Boron

hpjeannie

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 9:33:31 PM11/5/09
to
On Nov 5, 5:33 pm, Boron Elgar <boron_el...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2009 00:43:27 -0000, "John Dean"
>

What ever happened to "being the teacher" and suddenly asking a
question of the one person who isn't paying attention?

There are certain manager where I work who not only flat-out forbid
anyone to do texting during meetings; they even forbid laptops since
people are doing email under cover of "taking notes." Unfortunately,
those managers are getting fewer and farther between and the new
contingent are worse than teenagers about rudeness in meetings.

Jeannie

Boron Elgar

unread,
Nov 5, 2009, 10:02:07 PM11/5/09
to

The kinds of meetings where this happens are at companies that expect
this level of employee to be multi-tasking all the time. Sounds silly,
but if these people didn't do other things while at meetings, they'd
never get anything done.

These folks go from meeting to meeting all day long. I'd hang myself.
I hate meetings and we have very few at our offices, but we get
dragged to client meetings all the time.

Boron

Bill Turlock

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 12:24:53 AM11/6/09
to

And she's hawt!

Snidely

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 3:42:46 AM11/6/09
to
On Nov 5, 4:43 pm, "John Dean" <john-d...@fraglineone.net> wrote:
> A women tweets "I'm in a board meeting. Having a miscarriage. Thank
> goodness, because there's a fucked-up three-week hoop-jump to have an
> abortion in Wisconsin."
>
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/nov/06/penelope-trunk-twe...

>
> And no-one on the board meeting asks "Why are you using your phone when
> we're having an important discussion?"?

ummm ... I am not sure I understand how the miscarriage wouldn't be a
bigger distraction -- even an upset stomach is likely to cause you to
squirm in your seat and look pale and make sounds other than bland
agreement.

/dps

John Hatpin

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 10:04:18 AM11/6/09
to
Snidely wrote:

"Will you please stop spontaneously aborting foetuses and
haemorrhaging copiously while we're trying to discuss January's
budgetary forecasts? Thank you."
--
John Hatpin
http://uninformedcomment.wordpress.com/

Glenn Dowdy

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 11:25:04 AM11/6/09
to

"Boron Elgar" <boron...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:6p37f5pethlbi87qs...@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 18:33:31 -0800 (PST), hpjeannie
> <hpje...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>>
>>There are certain manager where I work who not only flat-out forbid
>>anyone to do texting during meetings; they even forbid laptops since
>>people are doing email under cover of "taking notes." Unfortunately,
>>those managers are getting fewer and farther between and the new
>>contingent are worse than teenagers about rudeness in meetings.

>


> The kinds of meetings where this happens are at companies that expect
> this level of employee to be multi-tasking all the time. Sounds silly,
> but if these people didn't do other things while at meetings, they'd
> never get anything done.
>
> These folks go from meeting to meeting all day long. I'd hang myself.
> I hate meetings and we have very few at our offices, but we get
> dragged to client meetings all the time.
>

I'm in one of those companies. My most memorable week of meetings had 36.5
hours of meetings. Of course, a lot of those were in the evening with
overseas suppliers, so I did have a bit of time during the day to do real
work.

Glenn D.


Boron Elgar

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 11:29:09 AM11/6/09
to

Does it drive you nuts? Honestly, how does anything get done? When do
you have to analyze or write up or even organize projects when the day
and evening get sucked into meeting vacuums?

I really didn't mind it so much when I was younger (more energetic)
and before I had kids, as my social life was very much entangled with
business buddies, but been there, done that, I guess.

Boron

QueBarbara

unread,
Nov 6, 2009, 2:50:00 PM11/6/09
to

Sheesh.

--
QueBarbara

DT

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 9:22:58 AM11/7/09
to
In article
<714201f8-e485-4928...@x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
snide...@gmail.com says...


I watched "The Oh in Ohio" last night, which is about a business woman who
has never had an orgasm. Until she discovers vibrators, then gets addicted.
She sets her phone to vibrate and stashes it in her panties. But when she
has to make a pitch to their most important client, her husband keeps
trying to get hold of her...


--
Dennis

John Hatpin

unread,
Nov 7, 2009, 11:08:52 AM11/7/09
to
DT wrote:

A woman of my acquaintance, who had a brief but highly physical
relationship with a friend of mine, was profoundly deaf, and had a
vibrating alarm clock which she put under her pillow to wake her up.

According to my friend, this wasn't the only use she got out of it.

Bill Turlock

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 3:52:24 AM11/8/09
to

What?

Snidely

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 10:53:48 AM11/8/09
to
On Nov 7, 8:08 am, John Hatpin
<RemoveThisjfhop...@gmailAndThisToo.com> wrote:
> DT wrote:
> > In article
> > <714201f8-e485-4928-92b3-66652650f...@x5g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> > snidely....@gmail.com says...

According to Scientific American, Joseph Mortimer Granville should be
in the AFCA pantheon.

/dps

QueBarbara

unread,
Nov 8, 2009, 11:07:30 PM11/8/09
to
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 00:52:24 -0800, Bill Turlock <"Bill Turlock
"@sonnnic.invalid> wrote:

I've tried writing a couple of drafts, but I just can't adequately
explain why I thought your reply was sheeshy.

--
QueBarbara

Bill Turlock

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 5:07:00 AM11/9/09
to

Perhaps it was the juxtaposition. I can see where, placed there
in the post, and the thread, it seems inappropriate. Maybe I
should have started another thread, wherein I say, "and how aobut
that Penelope Trunk, she's pretty good lookin'". HTH
Bill

Heather

unread,
Nov 9, 2009, 5:49:19 PM11/9/09
to


FWIW, I felt the same way.


--
Heather

Bill Turlock

unread,
Nov 10, 2009, 2:51:59 AM11/10/09
to


Additionally, I showed no respect for the pain of her situation.

0 new messages