Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Attack of the p*n*s enlargers

0 views
Skip to first unread message

A Magee

unread,
Jun 24, 2001, 2:26:04 AM6/24/01
to

<sigh>

Anne
--
Eschew obfuscation.
afba website at http://www.crosswinds.net/~afba/

Geep

unread,
Jun 24, 2001, 2:45:50 AM6/24/01
to
In message <Xns90CA2326...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
<abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes
>
><sigh>
>
Indeed.

Here I am, sitting quietly, reading Afb-a with the first cuppa of the
day, house is quiet, L & J still asleep, MM curled up on my lap, when,
without a thought, I fire up IE and visit the Afb-a site. Yee-Hah! Poor
MM shot off my lap and out of the room at the speed of light ...

--
Geep

A Magee

unread,
Jun 24, 2001, 2:53:04 AM6/24/01
to
Quoth Geep:

> Here I am, sitting quietly, reading Afb-a with the first cuppa of the
> day, house is quiet, L & J still asleep, MM curled up on my lap, when,
> without a thought, I fire up IE and visit the Afb-a site. Yee-Hah! Poor
> MM shot off my lap and out of the room at the speed of light ...

ROFL!

Thank you, I needed cheering up.

Geep

unread,
Jun 24, 2001, 3:30:13 AM6/24/01
to
In message <Xns90CA27BA...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
<abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes

>Quoth Geep:
>
>> Here I am, sitting quietly, reading Afb-a with the first cuppa of the
>> day, house is quiet, L & J still asleep, MM curled up on my lap, when,
>> without a thought, I fire up IE and visit the Afb-a site. Yee-Hah! Poor
>> MM shot off my lap and out of the room at the speed of light ...
>
>ROFL!

Poor little girl! Dunno where she is now - outside, somewhere. I
notice, though, that she stayed in the kitchen long enough to empty her
bowl [1], so couldn't have been that upset.

[1] No, that isn't a typo ...


>
>Thank you, I needed cheering up.
>

Aww. Any particular reason?
--
Geep, gonna be a hot day today.

A Magee

unread,
Jun 24, 2001, 9:07:42 PM6/24/01
to
Quoth Geep:

> In message <Xns90CA27BA...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
> <abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes
>>Quoth Geep:
>>
>>> Here I am, sitting quietly, reading Afb-a with the first cuppa of the
>>> day, house is quiet, L & J still asleep, MM curled up on my lap,
>>> when, without a thought, I fire up IE and visit the Afb-a site.
>>> Yee-Hah! Poor MM shot off my lap and out of the room at the speed of
>>> light ...
>>
>>ROFL!
>
> Poor little girl! Dunno where she is now - outside, somewhere. I
> notice, though, that she stayed in the kitchen long enough to empty her
> bowl [1], so couldn't have been that upset.

The "yee-hah" probably just reminded her that her bowl was full and her
tummy empty.

> [1] No, that isn't a typo ...

Oh, good.

>>Thank you, I needed cheering up.
>>
> Aww. Any particular reason?

Just feeling a bit under the weather. I'm blaming the ex-tooth, even if the
tooth-yanking was Wednesday and this is Sunday. Or it might actually *be*
the weather, it being somewhat hot and humid though sunless.

A Magee

unread,
Jun 24, 2001, 10:50:11 PM6/24/01
to
Quoth Alan Brand:

> On 24 Jun 2001 06:26:04 GMT, abm...@nbnet.nb.ca (A Magee) wrote:
>
>>
>><sigh>
>
> penis envy?
>

Penis boredom.

Chris Russell

unread,
Jun 25, 2001, 5:28:43 AM6/25/01
to
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 02:50:11 GMT, abm...@nbnet.nb.ca (A Magee) wrote:

>Quoth Alan Brand:
>
>> On 24 Jun 2001 06:26:04 GMT, abm...@nbnet.nb.ca (A Magee) wrote:
>>
>>>
>>><sigh>
>>
>> penis envy?
>>
>
>Penis boredom.

Somehow I doubt any owner has any trouble thinking of anything to do
with his middle stump.

HT

unread,
Jun 25, 2001, 9:50:47 PM6/25/01
to
abm...@nbnet.nb.ca (A Magee) wrote:

>Quoth Geep:


>
>> Poor little girl! Dunno where she is now - outside, somewhere. I
>> notice, though, that she stayed in the kitchen long enough to empty her
>> bowl [1], so couldn't have been that upset.
>
>The "yee-hah" probably just reminded her that her bowl was full and her
>tummy empty.

I looked at the site once with the volume on and got quite a shock. Of
course having got a shock reminded me I was hungry, so it's possible.

>Just feeling a bit under the weather. I'm blaming the ex-tooth, even if the
>tooth-yanking was Wednesday and this is Sunday. Or it might actually *be*
>the weather, it being somewhat hot and humid though sunless.

Have you been doing the saltwater rinses like a good patient? It's
supposed to keep you from getting those annoying slow infections.

As for the weather, yuck.

Tracy, paradoxically feeling tired due to resting all last week

A Magee

unread,
Jun 26, 2001, 1:01:28 AM6/26/01
to
Quoth HT:

> abm...@nbnet.nb.ca (A Magee) wrote:
>
>>Quoth Geep:
>>
>>> Poor little girl! Dunno where she is now - outside, somewhere. I
>>> notice, though, that she stayed in the kitchen long enough to empty
>>> her bowl [1], so couldn't have been that upset.
>>
>>The "yee-hah" probably just reminded her that her bowl was full and her
>>tummy empty.
>
> I looked at the site once with the volume on and got quite a shock. Of
> course having got a shock reminded me I was hungry, so it's possible.

Yes! Michael, you are the yee-haw champeen!


>
>>Just feeling a bit under the weather. I'm blaming the ex-tooth, even if
>>the tooth-yanking was Wednesday and this is Sunday. Or it might
>>actually *be* the weather, it being somewhat hot and humid though
>>sunless.
>
> Have you been doing the saltwater rinses like a good patient? It's
> supposed to keep you from getting those annoying slow infections.

I have, but I don't think I've been doing it often enough. I'm not fond of
warm salty water.

> As for the weather, yuck.

Ar. 'Sbloody hot and humid still. I'm sweating so much that I feel like a
slug. Leaving mucus trails everywhere.



> Tracy, paradoxically feeling tired due to resting all last week

You need another week off to recover from your week off.

Anne, who has a headache

A Magee

unread,
Jun 26, 2001, 2:14:03 AM6/26/01
to
Quoth Chris Russell:

I was referring to non-owners.

Chris Russell

unread,
Jun 26, 2001, 4:17:14 AM6/26/01
to
On 26 Jun 2001 06:14:03 GMT, abm...@nbnet.nb.ca (A Magee) wrote:

>Quoth Chris Russell:
>
>> On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 02:50:11 GMT, abm...@nbnet.nb.ca (A Magee) wrote:
>>
>>>Quoth Alan Brand:
>>>
>>>> On 24 Jun 2001 06:26:04 GMT, abm...@nbnet.nb.ca (A Magee) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>><sigh>
>>>>
>>>> penis envy?
>>>>
>>>
>>>Penis boredom.
>>
>> Somehow I doubt any owner has any trouble thinking of anything to do
>> with his middle stump.
>
>I was referring to non-owners.

Yeah, I can imagine that would be pretty grim.

Geep

unread,
Jun 26, 2001, 9:16:55 AM6/26/01
to
In message <Xns90CAE151...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
<abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes
>Quoth Geep:
>>

>> Poor little girl! Dunno where she is now - outside, somewhere. I
>> notice, though, that she stayed in the kitchen long enough to empty her
>> bowl [1], so couldn't have been that upset.
>
>The "yee-hah" probably just reminded her that her bowl was full and her
>tummy empty.

*Anything* seems to remind her that her tummy is (perceived to be)

empty.
>
>> [1] No, that isn't a typo ...
>
>Oh, good.

Clearing up feathers and bits of rodent is quite bad enough.


>
>>>Thank you, I needed cheering up.
>>>
>> Aww. Any particular reason?
>
>Just feeling a bit under the weather. I'm blaming the ex-tooth, even if the
>tooth-yanking was Wednesday and this is Sunday. Or it might actually *be*
>the weather, it being somewhat hot and humid though sunless.
>

Very hot and headachy here ATM. Hope the tooth is ok(ish).
--
Geep, thunderstorms later, apparently.

Geep

unread,
Jun 26, 2001, 9:18:44 AM6/26/01
to
In message <Xns90CC14CF...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
<abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes
>Quoth HT:

>>
>> Have you been doing the saltwater rinses like a good patient? It's
>> supposed to keep you from getting those annoying slow infections.
>
>I have, but I don't think I've been doing it often enough. I'm not fond of
>warm salty water.
>
Try an antiseptic mouthwash - Listerine or similar. Revolting, but
slightly less revolting than warm salty water.
--
Geep

Richard

unread,
Jun 26, 2001, 3:42:53 PM6/26/01
to
Some people said things, and then:-
Geep added

>Clearing up feathers and bits of rodent is quite bad enough.

Bits of frog are just as bad. Two in twelve hours.


--
Richard, whose Squeaky Chair can be seen at www.squeaky.demon.co.uk

If you wait, it will go away. If it was bad, it will be back.


A Magee

unread,
Jun 26, 2001, 5:50:37 PM6/26/01
to
Quoth Richard:

> Some people said things, and then:-
> Geep added
>
>>Clearing up feathers and bits of rodent is quite bad enough.
>
> Bits of frog are just as bad. Two in twelve hours.

Two bits of the same frog?

A Magee

unread,
Jun 27, 2001, 12:29:49 AM6/27/01
to
Quoth Geep:

> In message <Xns90CAE151...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
> <abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes
>>Quoth Geep:
>>>
>>> Poor little girl! Dunno where she is now - outside, somewhere. I
>>> notice, though, that she stayed in the kitchen long enough to empty
>>> her bowl [1], so couldn't have been that upset.
>>
>>The "yee-hah" probably just reminded her that her bowl was full and her
>>tummy empty.
>
> *Anything* seems to remind her that her tummy is (perceived to be)
> empty.

Heh heh.

>>> [1] No, that isn't a typo ...
>>
>>Oh, good.
>
> Clearing up feathers and bits of rodent is quite bad enough.

Urgle. Sometimes I'm very glad my two are indoor cats.

>>>>Thank you, I needed cheering up.
>>>>
>>> Aww. Any particular reason?
>>
>>Just feeling a bit under the weather. I'm blaming the ex-tooth, even if
>>the tooth-yanking was Wednesday and this is Sunday. Or it might
>>actually *be* the weather, it being somewhat hot and humid though
>>sunless.
>>
> Very hot and headachy here ATM. Hope the tooth is ok(ish).

Still hot and headachy, me and the weather both. Lucky the mad rush at work
is over. For now. The lack-of-tooth is still somewhat uncomfortable, but
getting better.

Richard

unread,
Jun 27, 2001, 4:33:09 AM6/27/01
to
Some people said things, and then:-
A Magee added

>> Very hot and headachy here ATM. Hope the tooth is ok(ish).
>
>Still hot and headachy, me and the weather both. Lucky the mad rush at work
>is over. For now. The lack-of-tooth is still somewhat uncomfortable, but
>getting better.

We had some lovely thunderstorms last night - a really REALLY *BIG* one
crashing out immediately overhead. Loudest noise I've ever heard. But
instead of being fresh it looks as though today is going to be very
muggy.

And no, Sally didn't think much of it; she scarpered off the bed and
legged it downstairs to hide under the sofa. Which is when I found the
rearranged frog.

--
Richard, whose Squeaky Chair can be seen at www.squeaky.demon.co.uk

Worlds Shortest Book:
Great Victories of the Swiss Navy.

Richard

unread,
Jun 27, 2001, 4:29:53 AM6/27/01
to
Some people said things, and then:-
A Magee added

>Quoth Richard:


>> Geep added
>>
>>>Clearing up feathers and bits of rodent is quite bad enough.
>>
>> Bits of frog are just as bad. Two in twelve hours.
>
>Two bits of the same frog?

Nope, different ones. The parts of the second were later artfully
rearranged on the bedroom floor in an ideal place for me to tread on
them in my bare feet.

--
Richard, whose Squeaky Chair can be seen at www.squeaky.demon.co.uk

In modern mobile phone etiquette it is imperative that all calls end with
"Hello? Hello? Hello?"

Geep

unread,
Jun 27, 2001, 9:02:10 AM6/27/01
to
In message <ExftsMAF...@squeaky.demon.co.uk>, Richard
<Ric...@pridge.uk.uk> writes

>
>We had some lovely thunderstorms last night - a really REALLY *BIG* one
>crashing out immediately overhead. Loudest noise I've ever heard. But
>instead of being fresh it looks as though today is going to be very
>muggy.
>
Funny you should say that - someone living a few miles south of us said
the same thing. We had our bedroom windows open all night, but didn't
hear anything.
--
Geep

Geep

unread,
Jun 27, 2001, 8:59:58 AM6/27/01
to
In message <8mRTJTA9...@squeaky.demon.co.uk>, Richard
<Ric...@pridge.uk.uk> writes

>Some people said things, and then:-
>Geep added
>
>>Clearing up feathers and bits of rodent is quite bad enough.
>
>Bits of frog are just as bad. Two in twelve hours.
>
Oh yuk. Frogs normally make a lot of noise when frightened, but
obviously neither of those made enough to terrify Sally.

--
Geep

Tim Miller

unread,
Jun 27, 2001, 9:33:45 AM6/27/01
to
"Richard" <Ric...@pridge.uk.uk> wrote in message
news:ExftsMAF...@squeaky.demon.co.uk...

> a really REALLY *BIG* one

Sorry, I couldn't resist.

Tim (tm)


HT

unread,
Jun 27, 2001, 6:12:23 PM6/27/01
to
abm...@nbnet.nb.ca (A Magee) wrote:


>Still hot and headachy, me and the weather both. Lucky the mad rush at work
>is over. For now. The lack-of-tooth is still somewhat uncomfortable, but
>getting better.


Congrats on the going-awayedness of the Great 3-month Deadline.

Remember the warm salt water. Can you convince yourself it's fries?

Tracy, gullible girl

A Magee

unread,
Jun 27, 2001, 6:16:44 PM6/27/01
to
Quoth HT:

> abm...@nbnet.nb.ca (A Magee) wrote:
>
>
>>Still hot and headachy, me and the weather both. Lucky the mad rush at
>>work is over. For now. The lack-of-tooth is still somewhat
>>uncomfortable, but getting better.
>
>
> Congrats on the going-awayedness of the Great 3-month Deadline.

There is still the possibility of a last-minute panic, but it shouldn't
require long hours. Although, since I'm taking today off, I will have to
make up those long hours somehow.


>
> Remember the warm salt water. Can you convince yourself it's fries?

No, but I'm learning to tolerate it. I think it was Geep's suggestion of
Listerine that made my mouth realize that there are worse things than warm
salt water.

Richard

unread,
Jun 27, 2001, 6:10:27 PM6/27/01
to
Some people said things, and then:-
Geep added

Hmmm...

--
Richard, whose Squeaky Chair can be seen at www.squeaky.demon.co.uk

The sex was so good even the neighbors had a cigarette.

Richard

unread,
Jun 27, 2001, 6:11:26 PM6/27/01
to
Some people said things, and then:-
Tim Miller added

Damn! Caught being on topic!


--
Richard, whose Squeaky Chair can be seen at www.squeaky.demon.co.uk

In todays world our technical skills are racing ahead of our social skills.
Not that we should curb technology - we should be improving our selves.

Richard

unread,
Jun 27, 2001, 6:09:16 PM6/27/01
to
Some people said things, and then:-
Geep added

>>>Clearing up feathers and bits of rodent is quite bad enough.
>>
>>Bits of frog are just as bad. Two in twelve hours.
>>
>Oh yuk. Frogs normally make a lot of noise when frightened, but
>obviously neither of those made enough to terrify Sally.

First one didn't, but the second one did. Amazing how much noise they
can generate, and so different from the standard froggy croak too.


--
Richard, whose Squeaky Chair can be seen at www.squeaky.demon.co.uk

Pizza is a lot like sex. When it's good, it's really good.
When it's bad, it's still pretty good.

Geep

unread,
Jun 28, 2001, 5:41:34 PM6/28/01
to
In message <Kd9uHIAM...@squeaky.demon.co.uk>, Richard
<Ric...@pridge.uk.uk> writes

>Some people said things, and then:-
>Geep added
>>>
>>Oh yuk. Frogs normally make a lot of noise when frightened, but
>>obviously neither of those made enough to terrify Sally.
>
>First one didn't, but the second one did. Amazing how much noise they
>can generate, and so different from the standard froggy croak too.
>
Indeed - I remember one, being cornered by two kittens, that screamed
like a (human) baby - a real hairs on the back of the neck noise.
--
Geep

Richard

unread,
Jun 29, 2001, 4:15:48 AM6/29/01
to
Some people said things, and then:-
Geep added

>In message <Kd9uHIAM...@squeaky.demon.co.uk>, Richard

>>Geep added
>>>>
>>>Oh yuk. Frogs normally make a lot of noise when frightened, but
>>>obviously neither of those made enough to terrify Sally.
>>
>>First one didn't, but the second one did. Amazing how much noise they
>>can generate, and so different from the standard froggy croak too.
>>
>Indeed - I remember one, being cornered by two kittens, that screamed
>like a (human) baby - a real hairs on the back of the neck noise.

This one sounded like a giant mouse. Being summertime, by morning it
already stank to high heaven. I found the big bits, but the pong still
lingered so I had to open up all the doors and windows, blow the house
through, and then track down the odds and ends...

--
Richard, whose Squeaky Chair can be seen at www.squeaky.demon.co.uk

The only substitute for good manners is fast reflexes.

Ken Butler

unread,
Jul 1, 2001, 8:17:35 PM7/1/01
to

My office-mate (who lives in north London -- don't ask) didn't admit
to a thunderstorm either, but there was certainly one here -- just a
medium-sized one.

Could do with one tonight -- still pretty warm in here at 1 am.

A Magee

unread,
Jul 1, 2001, 9:31:10 PM7/1/01
to
Quoth Ken Butler:

We had a humdingeringeringeringer yesterday afternoon. And I say that
advisedly. Overlapping thunderboomers, punctuated by explosions (or what
sounded like explosions), high winds, and oceans of water falling from the
sky. Well, not falling exactly. More like the world's largest high pressure
washing system.

Didn't last very long, but it knocked out the power in parts of the city.
As I discovered when I found Sobeys jammed to the rafters with customers at
a time when it is almost always almost empty. (The power was out in the
Stupidstore and the other supermarkets on the other side of the river, so
everyone came to Sobeys for their pre-holiday grocery-buying panic.)

I was kind of annoyed because I wanted to go to Stupidstore for their no-
name fudgesicles, which are yummy.

> Could do with one tonight -- still pretty warm in here at 1 am.

It got hotter after yesterday's thunderstorm.

Geep

unread,
Jul 2, 2001, 4:21:04 AM7/2/01
to
In message <L7iO+HA0...@squeaky.demon.co.uk>, Richard
<Ric...@pridge.uk.uk> writes

>Some people said things, and then:-
>Geep added
>>>
>>Indeed - I remember one, being cornered by two kittens, that screamed
>>like a (human) baby - a real hairs on the back of the neck noise.
>
>This one sounded like a giant mouse. Being summertime, by morning it
>already stank to high heaven. I found the big bits, but the pong still
>lingered so I had to open up all the doors and windows, blow the house
>through, and then track down the odds and ends...
>
*Bleaugh*

We found some feathers a few days ago, indoors, but haven't found a body
yet. We're rather hoping that MM took the remains outside ...
--
Geep

Geep

unread,
Jul 2, 2001, 10:09:38 AM7/2/01
to
In message <Xns90CDF8A4...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
<abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes
>Quoth Geep:
>

>> *Anything* seems to remind her that her tummy is (perceived to be)
>> empty.
>
>Heh heh.

You'd have heh heh'd when a planned lie in on Saturday was abruptly
cancelled at 07.15 ...


>>
>> Clearing up feathers and bits of rodent is quite bad enough.
>
>Urgle. Sometimes I'm very glad my two are indoor cats.

Mmmm. MM even managed to catch a mouse in daylight the other day. I
thought she only managed that sort of thing during the night.


>>>
>> Very hot and headachy here ATM. Hope the tooth is ok(ish).
>
>Still hot and headachy, me and the weather both. Lucky the mad rush at work
>is over. For now. The lack-of-tooth is still somewhat uncomfortable, but
>getting better.
>

Good. Lack of tooth isn't pleasant - I've got one which isn't quite
lacking, but certainly isn't the usual tight fit in the socket/gum,
which isn't good news.
--
Geep, very hot today. Well, by UK standards, anyway.

Richard

unread,
Jul 2, 2001, 5:41:06 AM7/2/01
to
Some people said things, and then:-
Geep added

>In message <L7iO+HA0...@squeaky.demon.co.uk>, Richard

>>Geep added
>>>>
>>>Indeed - I remember one, being cornered by two kittens, that screamed
>>>like a (human) baby - a real hairs on the back of the neck noise.
>>
>>This one sounded like a giant mouse. Being summertime, by morning it
>>already stank to high heaven. I found the big bits, but the pong still
>>lingered so I had to open up all the doors and windows, blow the house
>>through, and then track down the odds and ends...
>>
>*Bleaugh*

Tracking something by a nasty smell is certainly not a pleasant
pasttime.

>
>We found some feathers a few days ago, indoors, but haven't found a body
>yet. We're rather hoping that MM took the remains outside ...

Open the windows and let lots of flies in - maggots tend to keep down
the smell.


--
Richard, whose Squeaky Chair can be seen at www.squeaky.demon.co.uk

"Bummer," said Pooh when Tigger dropped the joint in the honey jar.

A Magee

unread,
Jul 2, 2001, 7:09:04 PM7/2/01
to
Quoth Geep:

> In message <Xns90CDF8A4...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
> <abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes
>>Quoth Geep:
>>
>>> *Anything* seems to remind her that her tummy is (perceived to be)
>>> empty.
>>
>>Heh heh.
>
> You'd have heh heh'd when a planned lie in on Saturday was abruptly
> cancelled at 07.15 ...

What? No details?

>>> Clearing up feathers and bits of rodent is quite bad enough.
>>
>>Urgle. Sometimes I'm very glad my two are indoor cats.
>
> Mmmm. MM even managed to catch a mouse in daylight the other day. I
> thought she only managed that sort of thing during the night.

Don't mice tend to sleep during the day?

>>> Very hot and headachy here ATM. Hope the tooth is ok(ish).
>>
>>Still hot and headachy, me and the weather both. Lucky the mad rush at
>>work is over. For now. The lack-of-tooth is still somewhat
>>uncomfortable, but getting better.
>>
> Good. Lack of tooth isn't pleasant - I've got one which isn't quite
> lacking, but certainly isn't the usual tight fit in the socket/gum,
> which isn't good news.

Ewww. Nerve-racking, that would be. Doesn't it rather spoil your dining
pleasure?

Geep

unread,
Jul 3, 2001, 9:54:55 AM7/3/01
to
In message <Xns90D2CD6F...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
<abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes
>Quoth Geep:
>>

>> You'd have heh heh'd when a planned lie in on Saturday was abruptly
>> cancelled at 07.15 ...
>
>What? No details?

*Meow*

'Nuff said?


>>
>> Mmmm. MM even managed to catch a mouse in daylight the other day. I
>> thought she only managed that sort of thing during the night.
>
>Don't mice tend to sleep during the day?

This one wasn't tired enough, apparently. No doubt regretting the
decision to go foraging in the middle of the day, now.


>>>
>> Good. Lack of tooth isn't pleasant - I've got one which isn't quite
>> lacking, but certainly isn't the usual tight fit in the socket/gum,
>> which isn't good news.
>
>Ewww. Nerve-racking, that would be. Doesn't it rather spoil your dining
>pleasure?
>

It just means I'm fairly careful how I chew, but it doesn't hurt, so
isn't too bad - does mean regular applications of that ghastly mouthwash
stuff though, to avoid infection.

The alternative is an extraction i.e. there isn't an alternative.
--
Geep, in wimp mode

HT

unread,
Jul 3, 2001, 7:36:19 PM7/3/01
to
Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net> wrote:

>In message <Xns90D2CD6F...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
><abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes
>>Quoth Geep:

>>> Good. Lack of tooth isn't pleasant - I've got one which isn't quite


>>> lacking, but certainly isn't the usual tight fit in the socket/gum,
>>> which isn't good news.
>>
>>Ewww. Nerve-racking, that would be. Doesn't it rather spoil your dining
>>pleasure?
>>
>It just means I'm fairly careful how I chew, but it doesn't hurt, so
>isn't too bad - does mean regular applications of that ghastly mouthwash
>stuff though, to avoid infection.
>
>The alternative is an extraction i.e. there isn't an alternative.

My mother just having endured that, I can tell you more about that
than you wanted.

Once the tooth is extracted, you can't eat anything acidic for 2 weeks
(including citrus and tomato products)

Eventually, they check up on how your jaw is doing. Then they can
drill a big metal rod into your jaw. Heal again (= limited diet again)

After a few months, your mouth has healed over the rod they put in
your mouth, so they go and unheal it for you.

Then they screw your false tooth onto the rod in your mouth.

You guessed it. More healing, more pain, more mouthwash, more
abstention from TF.

They say it's still preferable to false teeths.

Tracy, whose parents have false teeths, but who is settling for
several $600 crowns herself

A Magee

unread,
Jul 4, 2001, 2:13:24 AM7/4/01
to
Quoth Geep:

> In message <Xns90D2CD6F...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
> <abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes
>>Quoth Geep:
>>>
>>> You'd have heh heh'd when a planned lie in on Saturday was abruptly
>>> cancelled at 07.15 ...
>>
>>What? No details?
>
> *Meow*
>
> 'Nuff said?

You wake up *that* easily?

>>> Good. Lack of tooth isn't pleasant - I've got one which isn't quite
>>> lacking, but certainly isn't the usual tight fit in the socket/gum,
>>> which isn't good news.
>>
>>Ewww. Nerve-racking, that would be. Doesn't it rather spoil your dining
>>pleasure?
>>
> It just means I'm fairly careful how I chew, but it doesn't hurt, so
> isn't too bad - does mean regular applications of that ghastly mouthwash
> stuff though, to avoid infection.
>
> The alternative is an extraction i.e. there isn't an alternative.

Can't your dentist pour in some cement and fix it back in place?

Geep

unread,
Jul 10, 2001, 9:15:39 AM7/10/01
to
In message <Xns90D4213D...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
<abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes
>Quoth Geep:
>

>> *Meow*
>>
>> 'Nuff said?
>
>You wake up *that* easily?

The picture was incomplete - I failed to mention that she'll stand on my
head, and try to open an eye with an extended claw, before uttering
*Meow*, so I tend to wake up.


>>>
>> It just means I'm fairly careful how I chew, but it doesn't hurt, so
>> isn't too bad - does mean regular applications of that ghastly mouthwash
>> stuff though, to avoid infection.
>>
>> The alternative is an extraction i.e. there isn't an alternative.
>
>Can't your dentist pour in some cement and fix it back in place?
>

For some reason, she wants to remove it. A change of dentist could be
high on the list of priorities.
--
Geep

Geep

unread,
Jul 10, 2001, 9:16:50 AM7/10/01
to
In message <3b4255b3...@news.earthlink.net>, HT
<not...@earthlink.net> writes

>Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net> wrote:
>>
>>The alternative is an extraction i.e. there isn't an alternative.
>
[Merciful snippage]

>
>Tracy, whose parents have false teeths, but who is settling for
>several $600 crowns herself

Argh!
--
Geep, doesn't enjoy dental work of any description.

Alan Brand

unread,
Jul 10, 2001, 4:26:36 PM7/10/01
to
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:16:50 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
wrote:

Amy had to have a filling this morning. Since I'm unable to drive
(far) at the moment, Jan took her (the first time she's done this in
years, due to my more cavalier attitude to 'regular working hours')
and was very impressed with Amy's fortitude and stoicism. I think she
was referring to Amy's behaviour at the dentist's office, but I made
the mistake of mentioning something about Jan's driving.

--
AlanB

HT

unread,
Jul 10, 2001, 7:36:18 PM7/10/01
to
Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net> wrote:

>In message <3b4255b3...@news.earthlink.net>, HT
><not...@earthlink.net> writes
>>Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>The alternative is an extraction i.e. there isn't an alternative.
>>
>[Merciful snippage]
>>
>>Tracy, whose parents have false teeths, but who is settling for
>>several $600 crowns herself
>
>Argh!

If you were a dentist, you would nod sagely and make remarks about how
lucky we in the US are to have such great dental care available to us.

The insurance pays about 20% of the cost though


-
>Geep, doesn't enjoy dental work of any description.

I think we had established that I have a cute dentist

Tracy, prefers dental work to work, but it's a close-run thing

Joe Hutcheon

unread,
Jul 11, 2001, 6:12:26 AM7/11/01
to
In article <dpbeFhK7$vS7...@binnsroad.demon.co.uk>, Geep says...

>
>In message <Xns90D4213D...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
><abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes
>>Quoth Geep:

>>> It just means I'm fairly careful how I chew, but it doesn't hurt, so


>>> isn't too bad - does mean regular applications of that ghastly mouthwash
>>> stuff though, to avoid infection.
>>>
>>> The alternative is an extraction i.e. there isn't an alternative.
>>
>>Can't your dentist pour in some cement and fix it back in place?
>>
>For some reason, she wants to remove it. A change of dentist could be
>high on the list of priorities.

That's odd, because most dentists these days favour keeping teeth in; presumably
on the premise that once a tooth is extracted, it's no longer a potential source
of revenue.

Joe

Laura TM Salmi

unread,
Jul 11, 2001, 11:53:46 AM7/11/01
to

>>>Tracy, whose parents have false teeths, but who is settling for
>>>several $600 crowns herself

> The insurance pays about 20% of the cost though

I'm born after 1946, I get free dental care. And huge taxes.

Laura, grandma and parents have their original teeth, maybe with
a few fillings.

Sooz B

unread,
Jul 11, 2001, 1:02:25 PM7/11/01
to
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:12:26 GMT, Joe Hutcheon <nos...@newsranger.com>
expected us to believe:

>That's odd, because most dentists these days favour keeping teeth in; presumably
>on the premise that once a tooth is extracted, it's no longer a potential source
>of revenue.

You know my childhood dentist, then?

--Sooz, enough amalgam in my head to pave the Dallas-Ft Worth freeway

---

"Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read."

Groucho

Geep

unread,
Jul 17, 2001, 4:01:30 PM7/17/01
to
In message <3b4b63ed...@news1.on.sympatico.ca>, Alan Brand
<alan....@sympatico.ca> writes

>On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:16:50 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Geep, doesn't enjoy dental work of any description.
>
>Amy had to have a filling this morning. Since I'm unable to drive
>(far) at the moment, Jan took her (the first time she's done this in
>years, due to my more cavalier attitude to 'regular working hours')
>and was very impressed with Amy's fortitude and stoicism. I think she
>was referring to Amy's behaviour at the dentist's office, but I made
>the mistake of mentioning something about Jan's driving.
>
Heh heh ... driving isn't something we tend to discuss at home, ATM ...
--
Geep

Geep

unread,
Jul 17, 2001, 4:05:53 PM7/17/01
to
In message <3b4b8fd4...@news.earthlink.net>, HT
<not...@earthlink.net> writes
>Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>Tracy, whose parents have false teeths, but who is settling for
>>>several $600 crowns herself
>>
>>Argh!
>
>If you were a dentist, you would nod sagely and make remarks about how
>lucky we in the US are to have such great dental care available to us.

Whilst checking the balance of my deposit account.


>
>The insurance pays about 20% of the cost though

But the dentist still receives 100%. I'm sure we have excellent
dentists, at a price - not that I'm degenerating NHS dentists in
particular. I'm not biased - I hate all dentists equally, irrespective
of class, colour or religion.

>>Geep, doesn't enjoy dental work of any description.
>
>I think we had established that I have a cute dentist

Well, yes, but my opinion may differ, cos I'm not a female type girl.

--
Geep

Geep

unread,
Jul 17, 2001, 4:07:10 PM7/17/01
to
In message <eEV27.15097$Kf3.1...@www.newsranger.com>, Joe Hutcheon
<nos...@newsranger.com> writes

>In article <dpbeFhK7$vS7...@binnsroad.demon.co.uk>, Geep says...
>>
>>For some reason, she wants to remove it. A change of dentist could be
>>high on the list of priorities.
>
>That's odd, because most dentists these days favour keeping teeth in;
>presumably
>on the premise that once a tooth is extracted, it's no longer a
>potential source
>of revenue.
>
Indeed - the thought had occurred that, if Miss Dentist wants to oik it
out, it must be beyond redemption.
--
Geep

Alan Brand

unread,
Jul 17, 2001, 4:47:03 PM7/17/01
to
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:05:53 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
wrote:

Neither am I, so I'm pretty sure that you'd agree that I have a cute
dentist and a cute dental hygenist.

--
AlanB

Alan Brand

unread,
Jul 17, 2001, 4:47:34 PM7/17/01
to
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:01:30 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
wrote:

I shan't ask why.

--
AlanB

Geep

unread,
Jul 17, 2001, 4:59:07 PM7/17/01
to
In message <3b54a3cd....@news1.on.sympatico.ca>, Alan Brand
<alan....@sympatico.ca> writes

>On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:01:30 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>wrote:
>
>>Heh heh ... driving isn't something we tend to discuss at home, ATM ...
>
>I shan't ask why.
>
Probably a good idea, as SWMBO is sitting next to me, ATM. Sad, or
what? We're both sitting here, his 'n' hers PCs, with a little monitor
thingy, listening to James snoring ...
--
Geep

Geep

unread,
Jul 18, 2001, 2:59:47 AM7/18/01
to
In message <3b54a401....@news1.on.sympatico.ca>, Alan Brand
<alan....@sympatico.ca> writes

>On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:05:53 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>wrote:
>>In message <3b4b8fd4...@news.earthlink.net>, HT
>>>
>>>I think we had established that I have a cute dentist
>>
>>Well, yes, but my opinion may differ, cos I'm not a female type girl.
>
>Neither am I, so I'm pretty sure that you'd agree that I have a cute
>dentist and a cute dental hygenist.
>
Surreptitiously acquired JPEG?
--
Geep

Alan Brand

unread,
Jul 18, 2001, 7:51:28 AM7/18/01
to
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 07:59:47 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
wrote:

>In message <3b54a401....@news1.on.sympatico.ca>, Alan Brand
><alan....@sympatico.ca> writes
>>On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:05:53 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>>wrote:
>>>In message <3b4b8fd4...@news.earthlink.net>, HT
>>>>
>>>>I think we had established that I have a cute dentist
>>>
>>>Well, yes, but my opinion may differ, cos I'm not a female type girl.
>>
>>Neither am I, so I'm pretty sure that you'd agree that I have a cute
>>dentist and a cute dental hygenist.
>>
>Surreptitiously acquired JPEG?

I believe that you are confusing me with someone else.

--
AlanB

Sooz B

unread,
Jul 18, 2001, 1:02:17 PM7/18/01
to
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:05:53 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
expected us to believe:

>In message <3b4b8fd4...@news.earthlink.net>, HT
><not...@earthlink.net> writes
>>Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>Tracy, whose parents have false teeths, but who is settling for
>>>>several $600 crowns herself
>>>
>>>Argh!
>>
>>If you were a dentist, you would nod sagely and make remarks about how
>>lucky we in the US are to have such great dental care available to us.
>
>Whilst checking the balance of my deposit account.

From your boat or your Lexus.

>>The insurance pays about 20% of the cost though
>
>But the dentist still receives 100%. I'm sure we have excellent
>dentists, at a price - not that I'm degenerating NHS dentists in
>particular. I'm not biased - I hate all dentists equally, irrespective
>of class, colour or religion.

The best dentist I ever had was an NHS dentist in Market Harborough.
Wonderful, kind man and every American & Norwegian (long story)
dentist I've been to since has praised his work as being of
extraordinary quality.

>>>Geep, doesn't enjoy dental work of any description.

I couldn't possibly agree more.

>>I think we had established that I have a cute dentist
>
>Well, yes, but my opinion may differ, cos I'm not a female type girl.

Well, I am a female type girl and I think having a cute one would only
make it worse. Not only do you have the nervousness of being at the
dentist, you have the nervousness of being in proximity to someone
whose clothes you'd like to rip off and, erm, I think I'd better stop
here...

--Sooz, whose brain evaporates in the presence of male pulchritude

A Magee

unread,
Jul 18, 2001, 10:33:58 PM7/18/01
to
Quoth Geep:

If you're holding hands, I'm going to be sick.

Geep

unread,
Jul 19, 2001, 6:11:10 AM7/19/01
to
In message <Xns90E2EFC7...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
<abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes
>Quoth Geep:
>>>

>> Probably a good idea, as SWMBO is sitting next to me, ATM. Sad, or
>> what? We're both sitting here, his 'n' hers PCs, with a little monitor
>> thingy, listening to James snoring ...
>
>If you're holding hands, I'm going to be sick.
>
Heh heh - not quite that bad. Far too busy reading Afb-a ...

We tend to communicate by e-mail when I'm at work, but we haven't quite
sunk to the depths of exchanging e-mail whilst sitting side by side.
Yet.
--
Geep

Sooz B

unread,
Jul 20, 2001, 2:29:35 AM7/20/01
to
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:11:10 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
expected us to believe:

>We tend to communicate by e-mail when I'm at work, but we haven't quite

>sunk to the depths of exchanging e-mail whilst sitting side by side.
>Yet.

I won't say where or when, but I have witnessed this happening. The
closest I've ever come was exchanging zwrite messages with a friend on
the other side of a large, crowded computer lab at ISU.

--Sooz

Joe Hutcheon

unread,
Jul 20, 2001, 4:42:50 AM7/20/01
to
In article <QfJ9oFLu...@ntlworld.com>, Geep says...

And there's the bloodcurdling stories of poor people in days of yore having all
their teeth yanked out to save money on futurte dental treatment. I say days of
yore, but actually this only going back to my parents' early adulthood in the
1930s.

Joe, still has own teeth, hair, a wet nose and glossy coat.

Joe Hutcheon

unread,
Jul 20, 2001, 4:52:58 AM7/20/01
to
In article <3b54a401....@news1.on.sympatico.ca>, Alan Brand says...

>
>On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:05:53 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>wrote:
>
>>In message <3b4b8fd4...@news.earthlink.net>, HT
>><not...@earthlink.net> writes

>>>I think we had established that I have a cute dentist


>>
>>Well, yes, but my opinion may differ, cos I'm not a female type girl.
>
>Neither am I, so I'm pretty sure that you'd agree that I have a cute
>dentist and a cute dental hygenist.

I used to have a cute dental hygenist, but she's moved to another practice and
I've not go around <read: summoned up the courage> to making an appointment to
find out how cute or otherwise her replacement is.

The cutest dentist I've ever had (not, sadly, in the Biblical sense) was a
strapping Aussie wench, with bronzed skin and perfect teeth. She had the usual
dentist's failing of expecting me to engage in conversation when my mouth was
full of various bits of metalwork and numbed with anaesthetic.

Joe

Alan Brand

unread,
Jul 20, 2001, 8:06:18 AM7/20/01
to
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:42:50 GMT, Joe Hutcheon <nos...@newsranger.com>
wrote:

Ah, but were you 'vetted'?

--
AlanB

Joe Hutcheon

unread,
Jul 20, 2001, 8:35:50 AM7/20/01
to
In article <3b581ea9...@news1.on.sympatico.ca>, Alan Brand says...

>
>On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:42:50 GMT, Joe Hutcheon <nos...@newsranger.com>
>wrote:

<snip>

>>Joe, still has own teeth, hair, a wet nose and glossy coat.
>
>Ah, but were you 'vetted'?

Yes. Positively.

Joe

Alan Brand

unread,
Jul 20, 2001, 11:33:36 AM7/20/01
to
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 12:35:50 GMT, Joe Hutcheon <nos...@newsranger.com>
wrote:

>In article <3b581ea9...@news1.on.sympatico.ca>, Alan Brand says...
>>
>>On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:42:50 GMT, Joe Hutcheon <nos...@newsranger.com>
>>wrote:
>
><snip>
>
>>>Joe, still has own teeth, hair, a wet nose and glossy coat.
>>
>>Ah, but were you 'vetted'?
>
>Yes. Positively.

I'd say Balls, but as that may upset some of the more sensitive
readers ... Oblate Spheroids.

--
AlanB

Joe Hutcheon

unread,
Jul 20, 2001, 11:53:27 AM7/20/01
to
In article <3b584f08...@news1.on.sympatico.ca>, Alan Brand says...

I was indeed positively vetted, in 1984 (scarily enough). I could tell you why,
but then Karen Sexton would have to kill you.

Joe

Alan Brand

unread,
Jul 20, 2001, 3:14:35 PM7/20/01
to
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 15:53:27 GMT, Joe Hutcheon <nos...@newsranger.com>
wrote:

>In article <3b584f08...@news1.on.sympatico.ca>, Alan Brand says...
>>
>>On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 12:35:50 GMT, Joe Hutcheon <nos...@newsranger.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In article <3b581ea9...@news1.on.sympatico.ca>, Alan Brand says...
>>>>
>>>>On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 08:42:50 GMT, Joe Hutcheon <nos...@newsranger.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>
>>><snip>
>>>
>>>>>Joe, still has own teeth, hair, a wet nose and glossy coat.
>>>>
>>>>Ah, but were you 'vetted'?
>>>
>>>Yes. Positively.
>>
>>I'd say Balls, but as that may upset some of the more sensitive
>>readers ... Oblate Spheroids.
>
>I was indeed positively vetted, in 1984 (scarily enough). I could tell you why,
>but then Karen Sexton would have to kill you.

Oh. 1992 for me. I was tempted to make some correlation between Ms. S.
and the thread subject, but my survival instinct kicked in.

--
AlanB

Geep

unread,
Jul 20, 2001, 5:16:25 PM7/20/01
to
In message <3b5720b4...@news.CIS.DFN.DE>, Sooz B
<sooz...@yahoo.com> writes

>On Thu, 19 Jul 2001 11:11:10 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>expected us to believe:
>
>>We tend to communicate by e-mail when I'm at work, but we haven't quite
>>sunk to the depths of exchanging e-mail whilst sitting side by side.
>>Yet.
>
>I won't say where or when, but I have witnessed this happening. The
>closest I've ever come was exchanging zwrite messages with a friend on
>the other side of a large, crowded computer lab at ISU.
>
I did contemplate sending a message to Lynne, suggesting that a cup of
tea would be a good idea, but wasn't brave enough ...
--
Geep, made the tea himself

Sooz B

unread,
Jul 21, 2001, 2:39:03 AM7/21/01
to
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 22:16:25 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
expected us to believe:


>I did contemplate sending a message to Lynne, suggesting that a cup of
>tea would be a good idea, but wasn't brave enough ...
>--
>Geep, made the tea himself

One cup or two?

Geep

unread,
Jul 21, 2001, 4:07:25 AM7/21/01
to
In message <3b591eb8...@news.CIS.DFN.DE>, Sooz B
<sooz...@yahoo.com> writes

>On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 22:16:25 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>expected us to believe:
>
>>I did contemplate sending a message to Lynne, suggesting that a cup of
>>tea would be a good idea, but wasn't brave enough ...
>>--
>>Geep, made the tea himself
>
>One cup or two?
>
How brave d'you think I am ...
--
Geep

Alan Brand

unread,
Jul 21, 2001, 10:54:15 AM7/21/01
to
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 09:07:25 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
wrote:

Given that the first cup was obviously for Lynne, did you make a
second for yourself? I always make the maximum in our large teapot,
which translates into a large mug of tea each plus a second one for me
'cos I always down the first one quickly.

--
AlanB

Geep

unread,
Jul 21, 2001, 12:43:42 PM7/21/01
to
In message <3b59970b....@news1.on.sympatico.ca>, Alan Brand
<alan....@sympatico.ca> writes

>On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 09:07:25 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>wrote:

>>>>Geep, made the tea himself


>>>
>>>One cup or two?
>>>
>>How brave d'you think I am ...
>
>Given that the first cup was obviously for Lynne, did you make a
>second for yourself? I always make the maximum in our large teapot,
>which translates into a large mug of tea each plus a second one for me
>'cos I always down the first one quickly.
>

Twin! My first one always disappears whilst Lynne is still thinking
about hers, then she complains that I 'glug' mine, whilst she, of
course, sips delicately.
--
Geep

Alan Brand

unread,
Jul 21, 2001, 1:45:18 PM7/21/01
to
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 17:43:42 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
wrote:

This would translate to 3 large mugs for me, and a delicate china cup
for Lynne.

--
AlanB

Geep

unread,
Jul 21, 2001, 6:28:23 PM7/21/01
to
In message <3b59bf81....@news1.on.sympatico.ca>, Alan Brand
<alan....@sympatico.ca> writes

>On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 17:43:42 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>wrote:
>>>
>>Twin! My first one always disappears whilst Lynne is still thinking
>>about hers, then she complains that I 'glug' mine, whilst she, of
>>course, sips delicately.
>
>This would translate to 3 large mugs for me, and a delicate china cup
>for Lynne.
>
Indeed - mine is a 'builders mug', whereas hers is a mug, but that
delicate see through bone china stuff. Only holds half as much as mine,
too.
--
Geep

Geep

unread,
Jul 21, 2001, 6:32:28 PM7/21/01
to
In message <3b55be93...@news.CIS.DFN.DE>, Sooz B
<sooz...@yahoo.com> writes

>On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:05:53 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>expected us to believe:
>>>
>>>If you were a dentist, you would nod sagely and make remarks about how
>>>lucky we in the US are to have such great dental care available to us.
>>
>>Whilst checking the balance of my deposit account.
>
>From your boat or your Lexus.

Indeed. Is the Lexus popular over there? I'm not sure they've ever
caught on much, here. For that kind of money, people tend to prefer the
M-B C range, or BMW (spit!) 3 series.


>>
>>But the dentist still receives 100%. I'm sure we have excellent
>>dentists, at a price - not that I'm degenerating NHS dentists in
>>particular. I'm not biased - I hate all dentists equally, irrespective
>>of class, colour or religion.
>
>The best dentist I ever had was an NHS dentist in Market Harborough.
>Wonderful, kind man and every American & Norwegian (long story)
>dentist I've been to since has praised his work as being of
>extraordinary quality.

Hmm. My childhood dentist was a butcher - and, worse, an amateur
butcher. OK, I exaggerate, but no happy memories of him.


>>
>>Well, yes, but my opinion may differ, cos I'm not a female type girl.
>
>Well, I am a female type girl and I think having a cute one would only
>make it worse. Not only do you have the nervousness of being at the
>dentist, you have the nervousness of being in proximity to someone
>whose clothes you'd like to rip off and, erm, I think I'd better stop
>here...
>

Heh heh. I wouldn't want a tasty female dentist either - being seen as
a total coward by a male dentist is bad enough.
--
Geep

Geep

unread,
Jul 21, 2001, 6:33:49 PM7/21/01
to
In message <eaS57.514$ar1....@www.newsranger.com>, Joe Hutcheon
<nos...@newsranger.com> writes
>In article <QfJ9oFLu...@ntlworld.com>, Geep says...

>>>
>>Indeed - the thought had occurred that, if Miss Dentist wants to oik it
>>out, it must be beyond redemption.
>
>And there's the bloodcurdling stories of poor people in days of yore having all
>their teeth yanked out to save money on futurte dental treatment. I say days of
>yore, but actually this only going back to my parents' early adulthood in the
>1930s.

*shudder* I suppose the NHS does have some benefits.

--
Geep

Sooz B

unread,
Jul 21, 2001, 10:57:07 PM7/21/01
to
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 09:07:25 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
expected us to believe:

>In message <3b591eb8...@news.CIS.DFN.DE>, Sooz B
><sooz...@yahoo.com> writes
>>On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 22:16:25 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>>expected us to believe:
>>
>>>I did contemplate sending a message to Lynne, suggesting that a cup of
>>>tea would be a good idea, but wasn't brave enough ...
>>>--
>>>Geep, made the tea himself
>>
>>One cup or two?
>>
>How brave d'you think I am ...

Good boy.

--Sooz, can't wait 'til Tim's old enough to make the tea (well, yes I
can)

Sooz B

unread,
Jul 21, 2001, 10:57:09 PM7/21/01
to
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 17:43:42 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
expected us to believe:


>Twin! My first one always disappears whilst Lynne is still thinking
>about hers, then she complains that I 'glug' mine, whilst she, of
>course, sips delicately.

How does she do that? I find it impossible to sip real tea [1].

--Sooz

[1] As opposed to that unmilked, herbal stuff that I get served at
other people's homes

Sooz B

unread,
Jul 21, 2001, 10:57:10 PM7/21/01
to
On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 23:32:28 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
expected us to believe:

>In message <3b55be93...@news.CIS.DFN.DE>, Sooz B
><sooz...@yahoo.com> writes
>>On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:05:53 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>>expected us to believe:
>>>>
>>>>If you were a dentist, you would nod sagely and make remarks about how
>>>>lucky we in the US are to have such great dental care available to us.
>>>
>>>Whilst checking the balance of my deposit account.
>>
>>From your boat or your Lexus.
>
>Indeed. Is the Lexus popular over there? I'm not sure they've ever
>caught on much, here. For that kind of money, people tend to prefer the
>M-B C range, or BMW (spit!) 3 series.

Yep, Lexuses (Lexi?) are pretty popular. But so are M-Bs, Beemers,
Porsche Boxsters and those Audi TTs (which I have to confess I like).
For some reason, Lexus seems to be the one that gets tossed out most
when alluding to conspicuous consumption of the automotive variety.

--Sooz

HT

unread,
Jul 22, 2001, 11:11:07 PM7/22/01
to
sooz...@yahoo.com (Sooz B) wrote:

>On Tue, 17 Jul 2001 21:05:53 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>expected us to believe:

>The best dentist I ever had was an NHS dentist in Market Harborough.


>Wonderful, kind man and every American & Norwegian (long story)
>dentist I've been to since has praised his work as being of
>extraordinary quality.

All of my dentists have been private, and the best ones by far are in
the California practice. They actually pay attention to what you say
and explain what they're doing. And they are happy to give enough
novacaine to dull the pain, unlike a childhood dentist who most
definitely did not.

>>>I think we had established that I have a cute dentist
>>
>>Well, yes, but my opinion may differ, cos I'm not a female type girl.
>
>Well, I am a female type girl and I think having a cute one would only
>make it worse. Not only do you have the nervousness of being at the
>dentist, you have the nervousness of being in proximity to someone
>whose clothes you'd like to rip off and, erm, I think I'd better stop
>here...

I'm far too demure for that. Also, it takes a certain optimism to
believe that any encounter with Cute Dentist could possibly lead to
anything beyond a bit of visual entertainment, even if he's not
married. An optimism I can't even comprehend.

Here's a scary thought- in a way, I enjoy going to the dentist. Now, I
could do without paying nearly $1000 per year for the priviledge, but
at least I get an hour where I can sit back and do nothing guilt-free.
And there's less guilt, pressure, and difficult instructions than at
the hair-cutters'.

>--Sooz, whose brain evaporates in the presence of male pulchritude

My brain evaporates around any strangers. Last week, whenever they
showed up, I ran away and hid.

Tracy, who did see a really attractive man on the plane today, but
never did hear him talk to know if he was German or from some other
Northern country

HT

unread,
Jul 23, 2001, 12:17:12 AM7/23/01
to
Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net> wrote:

Does anybody here drink any caffeinated beverage from any mug smaller
than the largest available?

Tracy, should have eschewed[1] that coffee in Atlanta

[1] Probably "eschewed", but possibly not[2]
[2] Due to currently suffering from an irresistable compulsion to use
words without entirely understanding what they mean or how to spell
them[3]
[3] In case you haven't noticed

Sooz B

unread,
Jul 23, 2001, 2:32:09 AM7/23/01
to
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 03:11:07 GMT, not...@earthlink.net (HT) expected
us to believe:

>sooz...@yahoo.com (Sooz B) wrote:

>>Well, I am a female type girl and I think having a cute one would only
>>make it worse. Not only do you have the nervousness of being at the
>>dentist, you have the nervousness of being in proximity to someone
>>whose clothes you'd like to rip off and, erm, I think I'd better stop
>>here...
>
>I'm far too demure for that. Also, it takes a certain optimism to
>believe that any encounter with Cute Dentist could possibly lead to
>anything beyond a bit of visual entertainment, even if he's not
>married. An optimism I can't even comprehend.

Oh, my nervousness doesn't spring from any optimism that something
might happen. I don't quite know where it comes from, but it isn't
any notion of possible reciprocal attraction.


>Tracy, who did see a really attractive man on the plane today, but
>never did hear him talk to know if he was German or from some other
>Northern country

I take it his clothing gave something away?

HT

unread,
Jul 23, 2001, 7:43:56 PM7/23/01
to
sooz...@yahoo.com (Sooz B) wrote:

>On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 03:11:07 GMT, not...@earthlink.net (HT) expected
>us to believe:

>Oh, my nervousness doesn't spring from any optimism that something


>might happen. I don't quite know where it comes from, but it isn't
>any notion of possible reciprocal attraction.

I will admit to a slight degree of unaccountable fluster, ut it
usually that disappears in the cold light of reason.

>>Tracy, who did see a really attractive man on the plane today, but
>>never did hear him talk to know if he was German or from some other
>>Northern country
>
>I take it his clothing gave something away?

Perhaps that was a factor. It's hard to place what the exact cues
were, especially since he didn't talk or even have time to disable the
bathroom smoke detectors-- he just looked around for a free seat and
sat down-- but I'd still bet you $50 he was German

Tracy, amateur foreigner-spotter
Grand Champion, 2001 No-name-boat Cribbage tournament

Sooz B

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 2:58:46 AM7/24/01
to
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001 23:43:56 GMT, not...@earthlink.net (HT) expected
us to believe:

[handsome stranger]

>Perhaps that was a factor. It's hard to place what the exact cues
>were, especially since he didn't talk or even have time to disable the
>bathroom smoke detectors-- he just looked around for a free seat and
>sat down-- but I'd still bet you $50 he was German

Not having seen the man myself, I'd be a fool to take the bet. I know
what you mean, though. Take Detlef Schrempf. Even in a basketball
uniform, not speaking a word, he screams, "I'm German".

--Sooz

Joe Hutcheon

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 3:55:42 AM7/24/01
to
In article <oXOzakO8...@ntlworld.com>, Geep says...

>Hmm. My childhood dentist was a butcher - and, worse, an amateur
>butcher. OK, I exaggerate, but no happy memories of him.

AOL. My childhood dentis had no notion of using painkillers.

>Heh heh. I wouldn't want a tasty female dentist either - being seen as
>a total coward by a male dentist is bad enough.

I think a female dentist might encourage me to be braver. At any rate, looking
up into an attractive face would be some compensation (though I usually keep my
eyes tight shut during dental work).

Joe

Joe Hutcheon

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 4:19:20 AM7/24/01
to
In article <3b5b8078...@news.earthlink.net>, HT says...

<snip>

>Tracy, who did see a really attractive man on the plane today, but
>never did hear him talk to know if he was German or from some other
>Northern country

I saw a very beautiful young woman on the Piccadilly line yesterday. She was
blonde-haired and blue-eyed, so may have been German, but had rings on two of
her toes, and I don't think Germans go in for that sort of thing to any great
extent. She really was gorgeous.

Joe, will stop drooling now

Richard

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 5:27:02 AM7/24/01
to
Some people said things, and then:-
Joe Hutcheon added

>>Hmm. My childhood dentist was a butcher - and, worse, an amateur
>>butcher. OK, I exaggerate, but no happy memories of him.
>
>AOL. My childhood dentis had no notion of using painkillers.

Mine did, but they never seemed to work too well. In my late twenties I
got a gum infection upper jaw front. The gums drew back, exposing the
dentine and I began to get cavities there with a couple of years. This
meant considerable drilling and that white paste stuff being applied
strategically. No matter how much I told them I seemed to be damn
immune to the novocaine, nor how much they pumped in, it used to hurt
like hell every time.

Over a period of years, moving about a lot as I did in those times, I
had four different dentists and it was always the same.

Finally, arriving here; after the dentist had given me three separate
shots, leaving time between them for them to really take hold and yet me
*still* practically leaping out of the chair in agony, he decided to try
a new tactic. Two minutes after the jab I couldn't feel a thing and I
had my first ever pain free dental work.

Brilliant!

As he explained it - whenever they work on those front teeth they aim
for a particular spot where two nerves come out through the bone. The
left one goes to the left side of the jaw and the right one to the
right. Simple enough - but the thing is that one in a thousand people
have those nerves *crossed over* !! So when they wanted to work on the
*left* of my jaw they'd *actually* be hitting the darn nerve for the
*right* - numb that side fine, and then essentially be doing the work on
the left with virtually zero pain killer! No wonder it always hurt.


--
Richard, whose Squeaky Chair can be seen at www.squeaky.demon.co.uk

We've heard that a million monkeys at keyboards could produce the Complete
Works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know it's not true.

A Magee

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 7:47:02 AM7/24/01
to
Quoth Joe Hutcheon:

> In article <oXOzakO8...@ntlworld.com>, Geep says...
>
>>Hmm. My childhood dentist was a butcher - and, worse, an amateur
>>butcher. OK, I exaggerate, but no happy memories of him.
>
> AOL. My childhood dentis had no notion of using painkillers.

My childhood dentist[1] used general anaesthesia.



>>Heh heh. I wouldn't want a tasty female dentist either - being seen as
>>a total coward by a male dentist is bad enough.
>
> I think a female dentist might encourage me to be braver. At any rate,
> looking up into an attractive face would be some compensation (though I
> usually keep my eyes tight shut during dental work).

I do that too. And I clamp my hands onto the chair arms. (When I had my
first root canal, the dentist said "Just raise your hand if you want me to
stop for any reason." I told him I wouldn't be able to let go of the chair
arm. He thought I was joking.)

Anne

[1] He wasn't actually my childhood dentist. My mother (and possibly all
mothers at the time) had no concept of regular dental checkups, so I only
ever went to a dentist once during my childhood. I vaguely remember being
told to count backwards from 100, then waking up with 8 fewer teeth [2]
than I had when I went in.

[2] Baby teeth.

Anne
--
Eschew obfuscation.
afba website at http://www.crosswinds.net/~afba/

Alan Brand

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 9:18:58 AM7/24/01
to
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 07:55:42 GMT, Joe Hutcheon <nos...@newsranger.com>
wrote:

>In article <oXOzakO8...@ntlworld.com>, Geep says...
>


>>Heh heh. I wouldn't want a tasty female dentist either - being seen as
>>a total coward by a male dentist is bad enough.
>
>I think a female dentist might encourage me to be braver. At any rate, looking
>up into an attractive face would be some compensation (though I usually keep my
>eyes tight shut during dental work).

Having the top of one's head rubbed with her breasts is a major
compensation, allegedly.

--
AlanB

Geep

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 4:32:50 PM7/24/01
to
In message <3b5a2158...@news.CIS.DFN.DE>, Sooz B
<sooz...@yahoo.com> writes

>On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 09:07:25 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>expected us to believe:
>>>
>>>One cup or two?
>>>
>>How brave d'you think I am ...
>
>Good boy.
>
>--Sooz, can't wait 'til Tim's old enough to make the tea (well, yes I
>can)

Woo-Hoo! I already have this mental image of young James waking us at a
civilised hour on Sunday mornings, with a tray of biscuits, and freshly
brewed tea.
--
Geep, dreamer.

Geep

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 4:31:16 PM7/24/01
to
In message <3b5a21c3...@news.CIS.DFN.DE>, Sooz B
<sooz...@yahoo.com> writes

>On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 17:43:42 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>expected us to believe:
>
>
>>Twin! My first one always disappears whilst Lynne is still thinking
>>about hers, then she complains that I 'glug' mine, whilst she, of
>>course, sips delicately.
>
>How does she do that? I find it impossible to sip real tea [1].
>
I've no idea - tea is for glugging, not sipping.

>
>[1] As opposed to that unmilked, herbal stuff that I get served at
>other people's homes

*Bleaugh* Call me a peasant, I don't care, but ordinary, everyday
'builder's tea' is what I need on a regular basis (i.e. once an hour,
minimum) to get through the day.
--
Geep, just put the kettle on. Again.

Stuart Rogers

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 4:11:28 PM7/24/01
to
Alan Brand <alan....@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:3b5d754d...@news1.on.sympatico.ca...

I can vouch for that. My (now sadly) ex-dentist was absolutely
gorgeous. My admiration for her went up and up as I discovered
her work was unfailingly good and painless. (I suppose having
someone reach into your mouth and remove an entire tooth without
the use of anything other than finger and thumb, and with minimal
blood loss would impress anyone.)

My admiration for her dropped like a stone when she decided
not to do NHS work any more, and that if I wanted further
treatment I would have to pay a regular monthly fee that adds up
to far more than I'm prepared to pay. Needless to say I'm on
the look out for a less commercially-minded dentist. A shame.

Stuart, who finds Richard's account almost too painful enough to read.

Geep

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 4:50:10 PM7/24/01
to
In message <cca77.4934$ar1....@www.newsranger.com>, Joe Hutcheon
<nos...@newsranger.com> writes
*sulk*

I didn't see her.
--
Geep, Piccadilly line regular

Stuart Rogers

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 5:19:57 PM7/24/01
to
Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net> wrote in message
news:1oVElOFU...@ntlworld.com...

> >
> >[1] As opposed to that unmilked, herbal stuff that I get served at
> >other people's homes
>
> *Bleaugh* Call me a peasant, I don't care, but ordinary, everyday
> 'builder's tea' is what I need on a regular basis (i.e. once an hour,
> minimum) to get through the day.

I used to share a house with a chap who drank tea every hour,
on the hour. I could always tell how long he had been in the
house by counting the mug ring stains on the kitchen worktop.

Stuart.

Stuart Rogers

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 5:21:29 PM7/24/01
to
Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net> wrote in message
news:8IMG9sFy...@ntlworld.com...

> In message <3b5a2158...@news.CIS.DFN.DE>, Sooz B
> <sooz...@yahoo.com> writes
> >
> >--Sooz, can't wait 'til Tim's old enough to make the tea (well, yes I
> >can)
>
> Woo-Hoo! I already have this mental image of young James waking us at a
> civilised hour on Sunday mornings, with a tray of biscuits, and freshly
> brewed tea.

Yes, but just imagine all of the concoctions he will expect you appreciate
before he catches on to what makes a good cup of tea.

Stuart.

Alan Brand

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 6:15:20 PM7/24/01
to
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:50:10 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
wrote:

Neither did I.

--
AlanB, Picccalilli and cheese sandwich for lunch

HT

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 8:05:03 PM7/24/01
to
Joe Hutcheon <nos...@newsranger.com> wrote:

You're supposed to keep your eyes tight shut. Keeps the bits of silver
& porcelain or whatever that junk is out of scratching your cornea to
bits.

Of course if you're not looking, you don't know when the bad things
are going to happen.

Tracy, expert at fillings girl

A Magee

unread,
Jul 24, 2001, 9:12:59 PM7/24/01
to
Quoth Geep:

He's only 3 months old! Let him get bigger than the tray first.

Sooz B

unread,
Jul 25, 2001, 1:09:50 AM7/25/01
to
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:31:16 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
expected us to believe:

>In message <3b5a21c3...@news.CIS.DFN.DE>, Sooz B
><sooz...@yahoo.com> writes
>>On Sat, 21 Jul 2001 17:43:42 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>>expected us to believe:
>>
>>
>>>Twin! My first one always disappears whilst Lynne is still thinking
>>>about hers, then she complains that I 'glug' mine, whilst she, of
>>>course, sips delicately.
>>
>>How does she do that? I find it impossible to sip real tea [1].
>>
>I've no idea - tea is for glugging, not sipping.
>>
>>[1] As opposed to that unmilked, herbal stuff that I get served at
>>other people's homes
>
>*Bleaugh* Call me a peasant, I don't care, but ordinary, everyday
>'builder's tea' is what I need on a regular basis (i.e. once an hour,
>minimum) to get through the day.

I am totally with you on this, but most Seattleites seem to think that
"tea" is some pale yellow, caffeine-free swill made from pouring hot
water on a bagful of herbs.

>Geep, just put the kettle on. Again.

If you insist.

--Sooz, heading towards the kitchen now

Geep

unread,
Jul 25, 2001, 1:32:26 PM7/25/01
to
In message <VFl77.124755$Do6.5...@nnrp4.clara.net>, Stuart Rogers
<stuart...@aralc.co.uk> writes

>Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net> wrote in message
>news:1oVElOFU...@ntlworld.com...
>>
>> *Bleaugh* Call me a peasant, I don't care, but ordinary, everyday
>> 'builder's tea' is what I need on a regular basis (i.e. once an hour,
>> minimum) to get through the day.
>
>I used to share a house with a chap who drank tea every hour,
>on the hour. I could always tell how long he had been in the
>house by counting the mug ring stains on the kitchen worktop.
>
I'm far too sneaky to be caught like that - the worktop gets wiped after
every cup. 'Tis the biscuit crumbs that catch me out ...

NP Booker T - Time is Tight
--
Geep
http://www.binnsroad.net

Geep

unread,
Jul 25, 2001, 1:35:45 PM7/25/01
to
In message <3b5e427f...@news.CIS.DFN.DE>, Sooz B
<sooz...@yahoo.com> writes

>On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 21:31:16 +0100, Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net>
>expected us to believe:
>>
>>*Bleaugh* Call me a peasant, I don't care, but ordinary, everyday
>>'builder's tea' is what I need on a regular basis (i.e. once an hour,
>>minimum) to get through the day.
>
>I am totally with you on this, but most Seattleites seem to think that
>"tea" is some pale yellow, caffeine-free swill made from pouring hot
>water on a bagful of herbs.

Uh oh ... why make 'tea' with a bouquet garni [WOCAB]?


>
>>Geep, just put the kettle on. Again.
>
>If you insist.
>

LOL!

NP Caravelles - You don't have to be a baby to cry [1]

[1] Bet no-one remembers that.
--
Geep

Geep

unread,
Jul 25, 2001, 1:38:27 PM7/25/01
to
In message <3Gl77.124757$Do6.5...@nnrp4.clara.net>, Stuart Rogers
<stuart...@aralc.co.uk> writes

>Geep <geep...@binnsroad.net> wrote in message
>news:8IMG9sFy...@ntlworld.com...
>>
>> Woo-Hoo! I already have this mental image of young James waking us at a
>> civilised hour on Sunday mornings, with a tray of biscuits, and freshly
>> brewed tea.
>
>Yes, but just imagine all of the concoctions he will expect you appreciate
>before he catches on to what makes a good cup of tea.
>
Hmm. Then there is 'breakfast' to look forward to, I suppose.

Working from home today, so brekkie was a very civilised affair - bran
flakes with sultanas, followed by tea and toast, out in the sunshine.

NP Fortunes - Caroline
--
Geep
http://www.binnsroad.net

Geep

unread,
Jul 25, 2001, 1:41:09 PM7/25/01
to
In message <Xns90E8E26B...@130.133.1.4>, A Magee
<abm...@nbnet.nb.ca> writes
>Quoth Geep:

>>
>> Woo-Hoo! I already have this mental image of young James waking us at a
>> civilised hour on Sunday mornings, with a tray of biscuits, and freshly
>> brewed tea.
>
>He's only 3 months old! Let him get bigger than the tray first.
>
ROFL! He is *huge* now! Well, OK, perhaps an exaggeration, but growing
by the minute. Huge fat thighs instead of the skinny little legs he had
a few weeks ago.

NP Manfred Mann - Do Wah Diddy Diddy
--
Geep

A Magee

unread,
Jul 25, 2001, 2:16:34 PM7/25/01
to
Quoth Geep:

> NP Caravelles - You don't have to be a baby to cry [1]
>
> [1] Bet no-one remembers that.

I almost do, dammit. It's on the tip of my mind. Hum a few bars, wilya?

Anne, that'll be bugging me all day now girl

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages