Re: How the Moon Went into Orbit.
Art Deco
>In article <1171740610.6...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
> "Double-A" <doub...@hush.ai> wrote:
>
>> When some theorist in sci.physics a while back came up with a theory
>> that the planets were blasted out of the Sun, the conventional
>> thinkers were adamant about the fact that the trajectory (orbit) of
>> any object blasted off the surface of the Sun, would carry it back
>> into the Sun again. I wonder what makes their thinking different
>> about the Moon's constituent parts being blasted off the surface of
>> the Earth and being able to go into orbit and not fall back to the
>> Earth's surface?
>
>
>Scale.
Somehow he held himself back in this post from whining about the
"physics cabal" "suppressing the truth" again.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert
chatnoir
> Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <1171740610.686997.213...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Double-A" <double...@hush.ai> wrote:
>
> >> When some theorist in sci.physics a while back came up with a theory
> >> that the planets were blasted out of the Sun, the conventional
> >> thinkers were adamant about the fact that the trajectory (orbit) of
> >> any object blasted off the surface of the Sun, would carry it back
> >> into the Sun again. I wonder what makes their thinking different
> >> about the Moon's constituent parts being blasted off the surface of
> >> the Earth and being able to go into orbit and not fall back to the
> >> Earth's surface?
>
> >Scale.
>
> Somehow he held himself back in this post from whining about the
> "physics cabal" "suppressing the truth" again.
>
Art Deco is not a Carbon based enity!
Phineas T Puddleduck
Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
> >Scale.
>
> Somehow he held himself back in this post from whining about the
> "physics cabal" "suppressing the truth" again.
Yep - the secret room under the mountains in Colorado that houses the Darla's
Spaceship as well. They got it impounded after running up a bunch of speeding
tickets.
--
<-Coffee Boy-> = Preferably white, with two sugars
Saucerheads - denying the blatantly obvious since 2000.
Hagar
"chatnoir" <wolfb...@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:1171746831....@p10g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
Absolutely correct ... Art Dickless is an Asshole based entity.
Art Deco
Hagar
"Art Deco" <er...@caballista.org> wrote in message
news:170220072056333230%er...@caballista.org...
That makes about as much sense as the rest of your drivel riddled screed,
faggot.
Art Deco
Art Deco
>On Feb 19, 1:19 am, thk_...@yahoo.com (Tom Kerr) wrote:
>> In article <1171856828.427246.313...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>,
>> "Double-A" <double...@hush.ai> wrote:
>>
>> >On Feb 18, 5:54 pm, Tim McGaughy <tee...@ispwest.com> wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> >> You're not talking about something being shot out of a cannon. There are
>> >> plenty of forces that can act on an object speeding out of the atmosphere.
>>
>> >This would be more akin to trying to put a satellite into orbit by
>> >shooting it from a cannon. If there are other forces, how would these
>> >differ from forces acting on an object blown out of the Sun?
>>
>> And if you worked it out correctly, you *could* put something into orbit
>> around the earth using a cannon. The physics isn't actually that hard.
>> There are details but I certainly wouldn't be asking you about them.
>
>
>I am surprised you would assert that.
>
>
>> Now, sending something into orbit from the earth is in no way relevant to
>> putting something into orbit from the sun, especially if you have to
>> explain the actual formation of a planet, or several, in different
>> orbits, and also explaining their angular momenta and composition given
>> the massive difference in escape velocities.
>
>
>I am not really trying to defend the solar planetary ejection model
>now. But when I did try to defend Sergey Karavashkin's theory of
>planetary ejection, I got this strong rebuttal from Mark Martin in
>sci.physics:
>
>"> It's possible.
>
> No it's not. Not the way that you describe it. If all solar ejecta
>is on free-fall ballistic trajectories which return to the Sun, then
>no matter how the bits & pieces interact, the average trajectory will
>always return to the Sun. It's dynamically impossible for freely
>falling ejecta to "somehow" find itself in a stable orbit which
>bypasses the Sun. It takes some sort of further interaction to do
>that."
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/93a3fa490d369ada?hl=en&
>
>Do you agree with Mark Martin's statement? My question is, if this
>argument is valid in discrediting the solar planetary ejection model,
>then why wouldn't it also discredit a model where objects are thought
>to have been ejected from Earth and are able to go into orbit?
>Objects moving in the vicinity of the Earth follow the same Keplerian
>paths as objects in the vicinity of the Sun.
>
>
>>
>> That's up to you to describe and explain, as I'm sure you're aware, and
>> I'm sure everyone is waiting with bated breath for your scholarly answer.
>
>
>I have never represented that I am a scholar. For the most part, this
>is not a group of scholars, although a few occasionally drop in. If
>you want to talk to your peers, why don't you go to
>sci.astro.research?
>
>
>> Oh, and by the way, why would our solar system be different to those
>> forming around other young stars with circumstellar disks? Unless of
>> course they also all went through some extremely unusual collision, which
>> I'm sure you're about to enlighten the astronomical community about. I
>> can't wait for you answer.
>
>
>Why are you being so sarcastic? We are just a bunch of friends here
>who like to kick around ideas of astronomy and astrophysics.
You misspelled "delusions".
>
>Double-A
Phineas T Puddleduck
Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
> >Why are you being so sarcastic? We are just a bunch of friends here
> >who like to kick around ideas of astronomy and astrophysics.
>
> You misspelled "delusions".
Notice how he doesn't tell the world about his alien girlfriend, or his sooper
dooper command position on Frootbat's Profoundly Dumb Science team?
Art Deco
>In article <190220071219330310%er...@caballista.org>,
> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>
>> >Why are you being so sarcastic? We are just a bunch of friends here
>> >who like to kick around ideas of astronomy and astrophysics.
>>
>> You misspelled "delusions".
>
>Notice how he doesn't tell the world about his alien girlfriend, or his sooper
>dooper command position on Frootbat's Profoundly Dumb Science team?
Nor the blow-up sex dolls.
Art Deco
>Tom It was observed and shown to break up much before it hit Jupiter. I
>saw the glowing pieces as did most of the world. I read it was 20
>pieces,and it was tidal forces that caused the comet to break up. I
>don;t know how strong its structure was. There was a time I thought
>comets to be "dirty snow balls",but Tempel 1 looked like a strong
>structured rock to me. Its looks with all those old craters gave me a
>big surprise plus a dusty surface. It was hit hard by a solid cooper
>car size missal going at 15,000mph,and it blasted a foot ball size
>crater,and nothing went into orbit it just went off in space.as a fine
>dust.
No doubt this post will induce little napoleon to strut about his inane
black comets again.
Art Deco
>On Feb 19, 11:33 am, Art Deco <e...@caballista.org> wrote:
>> Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >In article <190220071219330310%e...@caballista.org>,
>> > Art Deco <e...@caballista.org> wrote:
>>
>> >> >Why are you being so sarcastic? We are just a bunch of friends here
>> >> >who like to kick around ideas of astronomy and astrophysics.
>>
>> >> You misspelled "delusions".
>>
>> >Notice how he doesn't tell the world about his alien girlfriend, or his
>> >sooper
>> >dooper command position on Frootbat's Profoundly Dumb Science team?
>>
>> Nor the blow-up sex dolls.
>>
>> --
>> Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
>>
>> "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert
>
>
>Go back to your PV arrays, where you at least presumably know what
>you're talking about.
>
>Double-A
Are you trying to censor me?
John "C"
> Double-A <doub...@hush.ai> wrote:
>
> >On Feb 19, 11:33 am, Art Deco <e...@caballista.org> wrote:
> >> Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article <190220071219330310%e...@caballista.org>,
> >> > Art Deco <e...@caballista.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> >Why are you being so sarcastic? We are just a bunch of friends
here
> >> >> >who like to kick around ideas of astronomy and astrophysics.
> >>
> >> >> You misspelled "delusions".
> >>
> >> >Notice how he doesn't tell the world about his alien girlfriend, or
his
> >> >sooper
> >> >dooper command position on Frootbat's Profoundly Dumb Science team?
> >>
> >> Nor the blow-up sex dolls.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
> >>
> >> "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert
> >
> >
> >Go back to your PV arrays, where you at least presumably know what
> >you're talking about.
> >
> >Double-A
>
> Are you trying to censor me?
>
H.J.
John "C"
> G=EMC^2 Glazier <herbert...@webtv.net> wrote:
>
> >Tom It was observed and shown to break up much before it hit Jupiter. I
> >saw the glowing pieces as did most of the world. I read it was 20
> >pieces,and it was tidal forces that caused the comet to break up. I
> >don;t know how strong its structure was. There was a time I thought
> >comets to be "dirty snow balls",but Tempel 1 looked like a strong
> >structured rock to me. Its looks with all those old craters gave me a
> >big surprise plus a dusty surface. It was hit hard by a solid cooper
> >car size missal going at 15,000mph,and it blasted a foot ball size
> >crater,and nothing went into orbit it just went off in space.as a fine
> >dust.
>
> No doubt this post will induce little napoleon to strut about his inane
> black comets again.
>
the city park, again.
H.J.
chatnoir
> Phineas T Puddleduck <phineaspuddled...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> >In article <190220071219330310%e...@caballista.org>,
>
> >> >Why are you being so sarcastic? We are just a bunch of friends here
> >> >who like to kick around ideas of astronomy and astrophysics.
>
> >> You misspelled "delusions".
>
> >Notice how he doesn't tell the world about his alien girlfriend, or his sooper
> >dooper command position on Frootbat's Profoundly Dumb Science team?
>
> Nor the blow-up sex dolls.
Sad to say Art Deco - But your main squeeze was caught and eaten
recently!:
http://news.rin.ru/eng/news///9871/5//
Wonder-fish from Azov sea
Two weeks ago there was a storm in the Azov sea. After the storm the
fishermen from Semibalki village pulled out to the shore a strange
creature, which looked like a shark. The creature got into their net.
The wonder-fish made strange sounds and revolved the eyes. The length
was about 2 metres, the weight is up to 100 kg.
The fishermen were puzzled, "Is that an alien or what?!" They made a
picture with a mobile phone camera and soon all the people around has
the picture.
To the greatest regret of the scientists and ufologists, the fishermen
were not alarmed by the strange look of the "fish" and ate it. They
say, it was the tastiest fish ever.
The scientist who have seen the picture are bewildered - they have
never seen anything like that.
-----
Vat Art Deco use to swin and make love to!:
http://news.rin.ru/eng/pictures/7/9871.jpg
Art Deco
>On Feb 19, 10:22 pm, Tim McGaughy <tee...@ispwest.com> wrote:
>> in article 1171856828.427246.313...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com, Double-A
>> at double...@hush.ai wrote on 2/18/07 9:47 PM:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 18, 5:54 pm, Tim McGaughy <tee...@ispwest.com> wrote:
>> >> in article 1171740610.686997.213...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com, Double-A
>> >> at double...@hush.ai wrote on 2/17/07 1:30 PM:
>>
>> >>> On Feb 17, 11:00 am, herbertglaz...@webtv.net (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
>> >>>> Hagar (not so horrible) take away hit,and make it a very close miss,and
>> >>>> it fits Bert
>>
>> >>> When some theorist in sci.physics a while back came up with a theory
>> >>> that the planets were blasted out of the Sun, the conventional
>> >>> thinkers were adamant about the fact that the trajectory (orbit) of
>> >>> any object blasted off the surface of the Sun, would carry it back
>> >>> into the Sun again. I wonder what makes their thinking different
>> >>> about the Moon's constituent parts being blasted off the surface of
>> >>> the Earth and being able to go into orbit and not fall back to the
>> >>> Earth's surface?
>>
>> >> The space shuttle does it all the time. Doesn't come back until it wants
>> >> to.
>>
>> > The Space Shuttle has a burn to give it sideways motion to put it into
>> > orbit.
>>
>> So?
>>
>> >> You're not talking about something being shot out of a cannon. There are
>> >> plenty of forces that can act on an object speeding out of the atmosphere.
>>
>> > This would be more akin to trying to put a satellite into orbit by
>> > shooting it from a cannon.
>>
>> You could, with a strong enough cannon. Hypothetically, of course. I'm sure
>> a mass the size of Mars slamming into Earth just might create enough energy
>> to do the trick with a somewhat smaller lump of molten rock.
>>
>> If there are other forces, how would these
>>
>> > differ from forces acting on an object blown out of the Sun?
>>
>> Don't know, don't care.
>
>
>A truly brilliant response!
I'd say it is way more intelligent than "it fits".
John "C"
"malscribe" <rogue...@rotted.pencil> wrote in message
news:E2E98DD993823@C7ADCA2...
> John "C" farted out this reeking cloud:
> or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support groups, and
> nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
Thanks for the info!
H.J.
Art Deco
>On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:26:03 -0600, "John \"C\""
><hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>
>> Deco
>
>Can't shake that Deco obsession, eh?
He has a fancy Kevlar collar and leash.
Kali
said:
: Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without breaking a hip
: or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support groups, and
: nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
Which support groups? Evidence?
Kali
--
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called
research, would it?"
- Albert Einstein
Sean Monaghan
news:eri312$ajj$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> In <E2E98DD993823@C7ADCA2>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
> said:
>
>: Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without breaking a
>: hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support
>: groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
>
> Which support groups? Evidence?
alt.astronomy - It's a de facto support-group for saucerheads in denial.
--
Official FAQ for Alt.Usenet.Kooks: http://www.caballista.org/auk
COOSN-266-06-58907
Skepticult: 618-90140-613
Hammer of Thor - August 2005
Pierre Salinger Memorial HL&S awards - 3/2005, 7/2005, 8/2005, 8/2006
Kali
se...@alcatroll.com said:
: Kali <ka...@powder.keg> wrote in
: news:eri312$ajj$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
:
: > In <E2E98DD993823@C7ADCA2>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
: > said:
: >
: >: Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without breaking a
: >: hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support
: >: groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
: >
: > Which support groups? Evidence?
:
: alt.astronomy - It's a de facto support-group for saucerheads in denial.
So "Good ship Darlapop" is new slang for support group. Makes
sense to me, esp. since fr00tbat is the commanding officer.
Thanks, Sean. I learn something new every day on the Usernets.
Phineas T Puddleduck
Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
> Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:26:03 -0600, "John \"C\""
> ><hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
> >
> >> Deco
> >
> >Can't shake that Deco obsession, eh?
>
> He has a fancy Kevlar collar and leash.
I think such level of obsession is amazing. Art just knows how to reel in the
big fish.
nos...@sbcglobal.net
>
> alt.astronomy - It's a de facto support-group for saucerheads in denial.
A bit of (hopefully) comic relief, courtesy of MAD TV:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3L91fmKHjRk
OREO Jackson
>In <Xns98DE8C3C...@204.153.244.156>, Sean Monaghan
>se...@alcatroll.com said:
>: Kali <ka...@powder.keg> wrote in
>: news:eri312$ajj$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>:
>: > In <E2E98DD993823@C7ADCA2>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
>: > said:
>: >
>: >: Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without breaking a
>: >: hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support
>: >: groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
>: >
>: > Which support groups? Evidence?
>:
>: alt.astronomy - It's a de facto support-group for saucerheads in denial.
>
>So "Good ship Darlapop" is new slang for support group. Makes
>sense to me, esp. since fr00tbat is the commanding officer.
>Thanks, Sean. I learn something new every day on the Usernets.
>
>Kali
Coffeegrrl.
Jade
Kali
said:
: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
:
: >: Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without breaking a
: >: hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support
: >: groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
: >
: > Which support groups? Evidence?
: Google is your friend, hon.
:
: Just do an advanced search on group:*.support.* author:"Art Deco" and
: behold the results. Several pages worth.
You made the claim, the onus is on you to back it up.
I'm just as certain there were inadvertent followups to kooks
who like to troll support groups as I am that you are just as
full of shit as the kooks who've banged this drum in the past.
Kadaitcha Man
shallow jester. Thou parasite-infested whoreson caterpillar. Ye tinkled
and ye expelled:
> In <E2E98DE7EBAA3@C7AFBFA>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
> said:
>> Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
>>
>>>> Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without
>>>> breaking a hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of
>>>> trolling support groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
>>>
>>> Which support groups? Evidence?
>>
>> Google is your friend, hon.
>>
>> Just do an advanced search on group:*.support.* author:"Art Deco" and
>> behold the results. Several pages worth.
>
> You made the claim, the onus is on you to back it up.
>
> You are just as much a k0oK as the all the other kooks
> who've banged this drum in the past.
Edited for the sake of TRVTH on usenet.
--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion
Fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist to Kadaitcha Man:
"Imagine if I were to suggest "I have a prehensile tail". You
would, naturally, ask for evidence."
Kadaitcha Man in reply to fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist:
"Not at all. I would unquestionably accept your admission to being
a monkey."
"I have forgotten more about IT than both you sorry bitches combined."
DUHane Arnold in <r_myh.20067$yx6...@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Snarky: "I think 'Wolfy's taking the piss..."
Kadaitcha Man: "In which orifice?"
Kali
ja...@netk0o0oks.org said:
Mr. Coffee says VRRRROOOOOOOOOM!
Kali
nntp...@gmail.com said:
: Kali <ka...@powder.keg> Thou lost soul. Thou vanity in years. Thou boring
: shallow jester. Thou parasite-infested whoreson caterpillar. Ye tinkled
: and ye expelled:
:
: > In <E2E98DE7EBAA3@C7AFBFA>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
: > said:
: >> Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
: >>
: >>>> Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without
: >>>> breaking a hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of
: >>>> trolling support groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
: >>>
: >>> Which support groups? Evidence?
: >>
: >> Google is your friend, hon.
: >>
: >> Just do an advanced search on group:*.support.* author:"Art Deco" and
: >> behold the results. Several pages worth.
: >
: > You made the claim, the onus is on you to back it up.
: >
: > You are just as much a k0oK as the all the other kooks
: > who've banged this drum in the past.
:
: Edited for the sake of TRVTH on usenet.
I haven't completely made up my mind on this one. One third
snuh, one third kookologist, and one third kook.
OREO Jackson
Screw the decaf.
VRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jade
Kali
: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
:
: >: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
: >:
: >: >: Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without breaking
: a
: >: >: hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support
: >: >: groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
: >: >
: >: > Which support groups? Evidence?
: >:
: >: Google is your friend, hon.
: >:
: >: Just do an advanced search on group:*.support.* author:"Art Deco" and
: >: behold the results. Several pages worth.
: >
: > You made the claim, the onus is on you to back it up.
: Just did. Or do you not know how to use Google Groups Advanced Search?
: Do I need to spoon feed li'l baby a URL to the search results?
:
: (I'm guessing that you'd refuse to follow any URL I post. But the only
: people who don't know how to use GGAS are the profoundly retarded, so the
: URL issue is -- or should be -- moot in your case.)
:
: > I'm just as certain there were inadvertent followups
:
: Are you actually trying to justify support group trolling, or are you
: claiming that he's too fucking stupid to check the xpost list before
: submitting an article?
Following up to threads that are consistently crossposted (by
kooks, e.g. Micheal Baldwin Bruce and many others) to a support
group is not the same thing as trolling a support group. Do you
need to have this explained to you?
I could Google all day and not find *one* post where Art Deco
has trolled a support group.
Kadaitcha Man
porpentine. The food is such as hath been belched on by infected lungs.
Ye trickled and ye tehee'd:
It's all k0oK; the rest is fluffy guile. Trust me...
http://groups.google.com.au/groups/search?hl=en&q=%22the+kadaitcha+knows%22
Kadaitcha Man
podgy guilty soul. Thou map of woe. Thou sottish, bloodshot fragment. Ye
commented and ye jargoned:
<sucks two Bawls>
VVVVVVRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!
http://preview.tinyurl.com/pbzua
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
>
>> In <E2E98DE7EBAA3@C7AFBFA>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
>> said:
>>> Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
>>>
>>>>> Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without
>>>>> breaking a hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of
>>>>> trolling support groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
>>>>
>>>> Which support groups? Evidence?
>>>
>>> Google is your friend, hon.
>>>
>>> Just do an advanced search on group:*.support.* author:"Art Deco"
>>> and behold the results. Several pages worth.
>>
>> You made the claim, the onus is on you to back it up.
>
> Search? Do I need to spoon feed li'l baby a URL to the search results?
Oh, I think you should, because googling on group:*.support.*
author:"Art Deco" is going to get you nothing but pages and pages of
froggeries.
> (I'm guessing that you'd refuse to follow any URL I post. But the
> only people who don't know how to use GGAS are the profoundly
> retarded, so the URL issue is -- or should be -- moot in your case.)
In that case, when you use GGAS, you're really googling on "author:Art
author:Deco."
Now how retarded do you feel?
>> I'm just as certain there were inadvertent followups
>
> Are you actually trying to justify support group trolling, or are you
> claiming that he's too fucking stupid to check the xpost list before
> submitting an article?
Everyone makes a mistake now and then. But from what I've seen, Art is
more careful than anyone when it comes to snecking the support groups.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phèdre nó Delaunay
Kali
nntp...@gmail.com said:
: Kali <ka...@powder.keg> Thou relenting fool. Thou pussing boil. Thou
*gasps in horror* You are: The Shadow!
Actually I double checked my math:
1/3 snuh + 1/3 koook = 2/3 kook.
Kali
nntp...@gmail.com said:
: OREO Jackson <ja...@netk0o0oks.org> Thou earth-vexing foul slut. Thou
Yeah, decaf is for amateurs.
VRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!
: <sucks two Bawls>
:
: VVVVVVRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!
:
: http://preview.tinyurl.com/pbzua
Minty fresh eyebrows.
Kali
: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
:
: > group is not the same thing as trolling a support group.
: If a known kook, originally found outside a support group, appears to be
: xposting from a non-support group into a support group, xposting trollish
: responses
Trollish responses?
Failing to notice and remove the support group from the groups
line does != trolling a support group.
: to the support group has the same effect as trolling the
: support group directly; i.e., the regs see that people with problems are
: subject to troll attacks, and they lose faith in that part of their
: support structure.
I share your digust with support group trolls, but I place the
blame where it belongs: with the troll.
: As if that isn't bad enough, consider what might
: happen if the group happens to be somebody's only source of support in
: the whole world and then they decide that it can't be used.
Most support groups on Usenet have their trolls, and most regs
of support groups know how to use a kill file. Most of them are
aware that they are posting their vulnerabilities publically, as
well as the risks involved in doing so. An even larger majority
of support group posters have left Usenet for web forums that
offer some protection from trolls. I'm not suggesting that this
makes it ok to troll or to even inadvertently crosspost to a
support group, but one should be realistic about support seeking
on Usenet.
: (You know
: what troubled people with NO support structure tend to do, right?)
How a troubled person without support would respond to finding a
Usenet newsgroup unusuable depends on many factors.
If you choose to continue your arguments, would you mind leaving
out the melodrama?
: > Do you need to have this explained to you?
:
: Feel free to explain why you think it's fine and dandy to help make
: troubled people lose faith in their (possibly only) source of support for
: whatever ails them.
I'll respond with something just as logical and drama-queen-ish:
Feel free to explain why you think it's fine and dandy to
continue to beat your wife.
The analogy fails of course if you do, in fact, beat your wife.
: > I could Google all day and not find *one* post where Art Deco
: > has trolled a support group.
:
: Uh-huh.
Show me the money: One post demonstrating that Art Deco has
trolled a support group.
: You mean where he specifically trolled a support group reg who
: wasn't xposting outside the support group.
Let's see it, whether it's the entire support group or a
"support group reg". Then I'll show you a "support group reg"
who is one of the most notorious support group trolls, and of
course there are many other variations on this theme.
: But I say you're wrong, for
: reasons explained above.
You are entitled to your opinion, and I, mine. But when you
falsely accuse someone of something esp. as instinctively
abhorrent as "trolling support groups" and you keep repeating
it, you are no longer stating an opinion - you are simply
throwing shit, hoping it will stick. Surely a man of your moral
fiber - the great defender of those poor, hapless support group
inhabitants - wouldn't do a thing like that.
Kali
: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
:
: >: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
: >:
: >: > Following up to threads that are consistently crossposted (by
: >: > kooks, e.g. Micheal Baldwin Bruce and many others) to a support
: >: > group is not the same thing as trolling a support group.
: >:
: >: If a known kook, originally found outside a support group, appears to
: >: be xposting from a non-support group into a support group, xposting
: >: trollish responses
: >
: > Trollish responses?
: >
: > Failing to notice and remove the support group from the groups
: > line does != trolling a support group.
:
: actively participating in groups such as AUK is -- or should be -- ever-
: wary of he xpost list, since it's a common trick to modify the list for
: the purposes of fucking with people. A long time AUK reg cannot use the
: "it was an accident" excuse.
In your opinion.
: >: to the support group has the same effect as trolling the
: >: support group directly; i.e., the regs see that people with problems
: >: are subject to troll attacks, and they lose faith in that part of
: >: their support structure.
: >
: > I share your digust with support group trolls, but I place the
: > blame where it belongs: with the troll.
:
: Agreed. But your definition of "trolling" is a little strange; i.e., you
: are essentially klaming that when a troll xposts they are really only
: trolling some subset of the groups in the xpost list.
Where did I claim that?
: And I say you're
: wrong. Feel free to prove yourself right. (Or prove me wrong. Either
: way is fine.)
Feel free to beat the crap out of your straw man.
: >: As if that isn't bad enough, consider what might
: >: happen if the group happens to be somebody's only source of support
: >: in the whole world and then they decide that it can't be used.
: >
: > Most support groups on Usenet have their trolls, and most regs
: > of support groups know how to use a kill file. Most of them are
: > aware that they are posting their vulnerabilities publically, as
: > well as the risks involved in doing so. An even larger majority
: > of support group posters have left Usenet for web forums that
: > offer some protection from trolls. I'm not suggesting that this
: > makes it ok to troll or to even inadvertently crosspost to a
: > support group, but one should be realistic about support seeking
: > on Usenet.
:
: Trolls drive away Google users, because those people cannot KF. They
: also make the group seem hostile to noobs who select an unfamiliar
: support group with a promising name, and download headers only to find a
: glut of troll shit.
True.
: >: (You know
: >: what troubled people with NO support structure tend to do, right?)
: >
: > How a troubled person without support would respond to finding a
: > Usenet newsgroup unusuable depends on many factors.
: >
: > If you choose to continue your arguments, would you mind leaving
: > out the melodrama?
:
: Life is sometimes dramatic. There's no way to change that.
I'll take that as a "no" answer.
: >: > Do you need to have this explained to you?
: >:
: >: Feel free to explain why you think it's fine and dandy to help make
: >: troubled people lose faith in their (possibly only) source of support
: >: for whatever ails them.
: >
: > I'll respond with something just as logical and drama-queen-ish:
: >
: > Feel free to explain why you think it's fine and dandy to
: > continue to beat your wife.
:
: Evasion noted. (And I'm not married, so your query is meaningless.)
So the analogy is apt.
: [cue continued evasion]
Evasion of what? Your straw man?
: > The analogy fails of course if you do, in fact, beat your wife.
: >
: >: > I could Google all day and not find *one* post where Art Deco
: >: > has trolled a support group.
: >:
: >: Uh-huh.
: >
: > Show me the money: One post demonstrating that Art Deco has
: > trolled a support group.
:
: As I said, xposting trollish responses to support groups has the same
: effect as directly trolling them. That said, here's a fairly recent one:
:
: Message-ID: <030220070943336412%erfc...@usa.net>
Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology, alt.usenet.kooks,
alt.support.diet, alt.support.diabetes, sci.med.nutrition
From: Art Deco <erfc-1...@usa.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 09:43:33 -0700
Local: Sat, Feb 3 2007 10:43 am
Subject: Re: Diet/Exercise Equally Useful for Weight Loss
Quoting:
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD <and...@emorycardiology.com> wrote:
By inference, then, it's not ok when Art responds in an ongoing
thread of this nature because he is an auk poster?
I'm looking at the thread and all things considered, don't see
him trolling at all. I see him participating in a discussion and
pointing out what a fraud Chung is. In a thread on diet.
I suggest that if anyone finds this thriving group unusable it
has more to do with Chung than anything Art Deco has posted.
There's really nothing much more despicable than someone like
Chung - who holds M.D. credentials - preying on people with his
fraud and damnation.
: And here's a few more that I grabbed simply because it was convenient
: (they were on-screen with the one above):
:
: Message-ID: <030220070946377441%erfc...@usa.net>
: Message-ID: <030220070948092989%erfc...@usa.net>
: Message-ID: <030220070951264832%erfc...@usa.net>
Same thread as above.
: [cue the "it was probably unintentional" crap and the "kook did it
: first" bullshit]
Indeed, this is a different kind of situation from the one I had
in mind with Michael Baldwin "Snuh" Bruce, Bruce. The posts you
cite as "trolling" on Art Deco's part are actually minimally
substantive and topical.
: >: You mean where he specifically trolled a support group reg who
: >: wasn't xposting outside the support group.
: >
: > Let's see it, whether it's the entire support group or a
: > "support group reg". Then I'll show you a "support group reg"
: > who is one of the most notorious support group trolls, and of
: > course there are many other variations on this theme.
:
: Just because one person fucks with a support group, that doesn't make it
: right for somebody else to fuck with the same support group.
As far as trite goes, this works.
: >: But I say you're wrong, for
: >: reasons explained above.
: >
: > You are entitled to your opinion, and I, mine. But when you
: > falsely accuse someone of something esp. as instinctively
: > abhorrent as "trolling support groups" and you keep repeating
: > it, you are no longer stating an opinion - you are simply
: > throwing shit, hoping it will stick. Surely a man of your moral
: > fiber - the great defender of those poor, hapless support group
: > inhabitants - wouldn't do a thing like that.
:
: You're just trying to narrow the definition of "trolling" to exclude
: those who xpost troll shit to support groups from non-support groups, for
: some reason, even though I've clearly explained why that is as bad as
: trolling the support group directly.
:
I'm just not into "one size fits all" rules, because there is a
context to every situation. Simpletons and bullshit slingers
like you aren't troubled by context. What you call an
explanation is what I call an opinion. So is there any
particular reason that you would select Art Deco out for your
futile shit slinging exercise?
Kadaitcha Man
found you. Thou bankrupt withered. Thou drunk exceeding puppet. Ye
slobbered and ye cackled:
Getting the sum wrong is a good sign that you're not a kook. Kooks always
get it right. You got it wrong. Try...
1/3 snuh + 1/3 koook = 3/3 kook
Oh. Bugger.
nightbat
> Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:26:03 -0600, "John \"C\""
>><hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Deco
>>
>>Puddles Ducky just can't shake that Deco obsession, eh?
>
>
> He has a fancy for him.
>
Coffeeboys - denying reality since day one -- nightbat
"Doctor, what do we do with these clueless auk orphans?"
"Put them with the rest of the born losers"
nightbat
> Kali <ka...@powder.keg> wrote in
> news:eri312$ajj$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>
>
>>In <E2E98DD993823@C7ADCA2>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
>>said:
>>
>>: Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without breaking a
>>: hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support
>>: groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
>>
>>Which support groups? Evidence?
>
>
> alt.astronomy - It's a de facto support-group for silly coffeeboys in denial.
nightbat
> In <Xns98DE8C3C...@204.153.244.156>, Sean Monaghan
> se...@alcatroll.com said:
> : Kali <ka...@powder.keg> wrote in
> : news:eri312$ajj$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> :
> : > In <E2E98DD993823@C7ADCA2>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
> : > said:
> : >
> : >: Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without breaking a
> : >: hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support
> : >: groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
> : >
> : > Which support groups? Evidence?
> :
> : alt.astronomy - It's a de facto non support-group for coffeeboys in denial.
>
> So "Good ship Darlapop" is new slang for support group. Makes
> sense to me, esp. since the famous Captain nightbat is the commanding officer.
> Thanks, Sean. I learn something new every day on the Usernets.
>
> Kali
Coffeeboys - denying reality since day one -- nightbat
Kali
: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
:
: >: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
: >:
: >: > In <E2E98DE97D1C3@C7AAC74>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
: >: > said:
: >: >: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
: >: >:
: >: >: > Following up to threads that are consistently crossposted (by
: >: >: > kooks, e.g. Micheal Baldwin Bruce and many others) to a support
: >: >: > group is not the same thing as trolling a support group.
: >: >:
: >: >: If a known kook, originally found outside a support group, appears
: >: >: to be xposting from a non-support group into a support group,
: >: >: xposting trollish responses
: >: >
: >: > Trollish responses?
: >: >
: >: > Failing to notice and remove the support group from the groups
: >: > line does != trolling a support group.
: >:
: >: Failing to notice? Puh-lease. Anyone who's spent more than a few
: >: weeks actively participating in groups such as AUK is -- or should be
: >: -- ever- wary of he xpost list, since it's a common trick to modify
: >: the list for the purposes of fucking with people. A long time AUK
: >: reg cannot use the "it was an accident" excuse.
: >
: > In your opinion.
:
: time you get pulled over for speeding or something, and watch the cop's
: eyeballs spin 'round in their sockets before he starts writing out your
: citation.
Motor vehicles are quite capable of killing and maming people
and doing serious damage to property. Laws were created and are
enforced as a means of assuring public safety.
Crossposting on Usenet is the same, according to your analogy,
and the police (or self appointed police) should cite violaters
for similar reasons.
That's kooky.
: >: >: to the support group has the same effect as trolling the
: >: >: support group directly; i.e., the regs see that people with
: >: >: problems are subject to troll attacks, and they lose faith in that
: >: >: part of their support structure.
: >: >
: >: > I share your digust with support group trolls, but I place the
: >: > blame where it belongs: with the troll.
: >:
: >: Agreed. But your definition of "trolling" is a little strange; i.e.,
: >: you are essentially klaming that when a troll xposts they are really
: >: only trolling some subset of the groups in the xpost list.
: >
: > Where did I claim that?
:
: You said failing to remove a support group from the xpost is not trolling
: the support group,
Yes...
: which can be generalized
Careful now...
: as saying that a xposted
: troll article was only meant for a subset of groups in the xpost list.
It depends. A troll fully intends to disrupt a group, where
someone who responds to a troll and fails to notice/remove a
group in the groups line may have absolutely no intention of
doing so.
: Which is crap.
:
: >: And I say you're
:
: This: Feel free to explain why you think it's fine and dandy to help make
: troubled people lose faith in their (possibly only) source of support for
: whatever ails them.
Where have I said that I think "it's fine and dandy to help make
troubled people lose faith in their (possibly only) source of
support for whatever ails them"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
: > Your straw man?
: I read most of those posts. They clearly had no purpose other than to
: poke Chung, a certified kook. That's called trolling.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
: >: >: You mean where he specifically trolled a support group reg who
:
: I call 'em as I see 'em, hon.
:
: I flamed that "Kurt Gavin" idiot, too, a few times. I also smacked
: "Father Haskell" at least once. Both of them started paying more
: attention to xposts soon afterward, so I stopped giving them shit about
: it. Those spankings just weren't very "visible" because they only
: involved one or two posts before the issue was successfully resolved.
: Too bad more people can't be that way, huh.
You issued them a net.cop citation, huh?
lol
nightbat
> In article <200220072149415098%er...@caballista.org>,
> Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
>
>
>>Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:26:03 -0600, "John \"C\""
>>><hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Deco
>>>
>>
>>He has a fancy for him.
>
>
> I think such level of obsession is amazing and excites me. Art just knows how to
> smell like stale fish.
OREO Jackson
I love it when there's a whole lotta
VVVVRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOMMMMMIN'
goin' on!
Jade
OREO Jackson
wrote:
SAD - got it, oh winged tard of the night?
Jade
OREO Jackson
wrote:
You should post this several dozen more times to get your point
across.
BTW - Does your super sekrit orbital science lab have a
Breidbart-o-rometer?
Jade
Jade hasn't said anything about this nym yet...
i would have put them with the rest of the food.
--
jade hasn't said anything about my new sig, either.
Rob "Mop Jockey" "Roberta" Wolfe
OFISHIAL Benevolent Dictator of AUK
HAotM, ConT, dw:OPP, ASPCA , HAND, FOAD
http://netkooks.org/ofishialbenevolentdictator/picture.jpg
<insert more imaginary titles here later>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
Jade hasn't said anything about this nym yet...
then why do bicycles have to observe the traffic laws? they don't kill
people much.
> Crossposting on Usenet is the same, according to your analogy,
> and the police (or self appointed police) should cite violaters
> for similar reasons.
>
> That's kooky.
it's kooky that you replied.
>
> : >: >: to the support group has the same effect as trolling the
> : >: >: support group directly; i.e., the regs see that people with
> : >: >: problems are subject to troll attacks, and they lose faith in that
> : >: >: part of their support structure.
> : >: >
> : >: > I share your digust with support group trolls, but I place the
> : >: > blame where it belongs: with the troll.
> : >:
> : >: Agreed. But your definition of "trolling" is a little strange; i.e.,
> : >: you are essentially klaming that when a troll xposts they are really
> : >: only trolling some subset of the groups in the xpost list.
> : >
> : > Where did I claim that?
> :
> : You said failing to remove a support group from the xpost is not
> : trolling the support group,
>
> Yes...
>
> : which can be generalized
>
> Careful now...
>
> : as saying that a xposted
> : troll article was only meant for a subset of groups in the xpost list.
>
> It depends. A troll fully intends to disrupt a group, where
> someone who responds to a troll and fails to notice/remove a
> group in the groups line may have absolutely no intention of
> doing so.
trolling doesn't HAVE to disrupt anything. and even though you won't
respond out of pure fear, YHBT.
if they can't find a friend in RL, then it's probably better for the world
if they off themselves.
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
how about the straw man argument that people who write zany things on usenet
inherently must be mental patients?
--
Phineas T Puddleduck
nightbat <nigh...@home.ffni.com> wrote:
> Sean Monaghan wrote:
>
> > Kali <ka...@powder.keg> wrote in
> > news:eri312$ajj$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
> >
> >
> >>In <E2E98DD993823@C7ADCA2>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
> >>said:
> >>
> >>: Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without breaking a
> >>: hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support
> >>: groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
> >>
> >>Which support groups? Evidence?
> >
> >
> > alt.astronomy - It's a de facto support-group for silly coffeeboys in
> > denial.
> >
Oh look, frootbat poast-edits!
--
<-Coffee Boy-> = Preferably white, with two sugars
Saucerheads - denying the blatantly obvious since 2000.
Charlotte L. Blackmer
OREO Jackson <ja...@netk0o0oks.org> wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:06:19 -0600, Kali <ka...@powder.keg> wrote:
>
>>In <Xns98DE8C3C...@204.153.244.156>, Sean Monaghan
>>se...@alcatroll.com said:
>>: news:eri312$ajj$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>:
>>: > In <E2E98DD993823@C7ADCA2>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
>>: > said:
>>: >
>>: >: Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without breaking a
>>: >: hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support
>>: >: groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
>>: >
>>: > Which support groups? Evidence?
>>:
>>
>>So "Good ship Darlapop" is new slang for support group. Makes
>>
>>Kali
>
Sub-freakin-scribe!!!1!
Charlotte (and VROOOOOM!!!!!)
--
Kali
: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
:
: It was a sarcastic suggestion of how you might test your "I wasn't paying
: attention" excuse somewhere other than Usenet, to get a better feel for how
: wrong you are. I am sorry you were unable to comprehend my message. I
: should not have presented such a complex concept to somebody so fucking
: stupid.
Your analogy is only acceptable to the degree that speeding is
similar to crossposting. False analogy. You lose. Next?
<makes note to self: consider the potential of all malscribe's
future analogical arguments to be completely irrelevant to
discussion/and/or simply argumentum ad misericordiam; flush
twice>
: > That's kooky.
:
: Suggesting that one should try to be responsible enough follow simple rules
: (like not fucking with support groups) is not kooky. It's called maturity
: -- a concept that is apparently alien to you.
Wow this one's a beauty of illogic.
Mainly argumentum ad hominem.
You lose. Next?
: >: >: >: to the support group has the same effect as trolling the
: >: >: >: support group directly; i.e., the regs see that people with
: >: >: >: problems are subject to troll attacks, and they lose faith in
: >: >: >: that part of their support structure.
: >: >: >
: >: >: > I share your digust with support group trolls, but I place the
: >: >: > blame where it belongs: with the troll.
: >: >:
: >: >: Agreed. But your definition of "trolling" is a little strange;
: >: >: i.e., you are essentially klaming that when a troll xposts they
: >: >: are really only trolling some subset of the groups in the xpost
: >: >: list.
: >: >
: >: > Where did I claim that?
: >:
: >: You said failing to remove a support group from the xpost is not
: >: trolling the support group,
: >
: > Yes...
: >
: >: which can be generalized
: >
: > Careful now...
: >
: >: as saying that a xposted
: >: troll article was only meant for a subset of groups in the xpost
: >: list.
: >
: > It depends. A troll fully intends to disrupt a group, where
: > someone who responds to a troll and fails to notice/remove a
: > group in the groups line may have absolutely no intention of
: > doing so.
:
: If a somebody has no intention of disrupting a group, then they wouldn't
: xpost a troll-response to the group.
Always, except for when one does, unintentionally, crosspost to
a support group in response to a troll. This single part of my
larger argument ignores, of course, intentional cases where one
considers the magnitude of any disruption to be minimal, or one
is welcome in the support group, or one wishes to assert a
topical argument, or... and depends on one's definition of
"trolling" and "distruption" and the context of the situation.
Argumentum ad speculum, you lose.
: (Your "didn't notice" excuse is not a
: valid defense, except maybe for a noob who's only been on the net for a
: week.)
You attacked a single, less relevant component of my argument
and you still can't refute it. Your opinion remains an opinion,
and nothing more. Next?
: >: Which is crap.
:
: You've just spent many hours trying to defend support group trolling, hon.
Many hours? lol.
Now you say I'm "trying to defend support group trolling", which
is fallacious on its face. I'll bet that you are at a loss to
understand why.
: >: > Your straw man?
: I've noticed that you whip out the "straw man" evasion every time I spank
: your ass.
Here's a real challenge for you: present a logical argument and
I'll not point out the fact that it's a fallacious one.
: >: >: >: You mean where he specifically trolled a support group reg who
:
: I don't netcop people, sweetpea. I simply discourage support group trolls,
: unlike you.
:
: Hell, you not only fail to discourage it, you're apparently willing to
: compose lengthy (and weak) arguments in favor of it. How sad.
<whoosh>
At the end of the day, you've utterly failed to prove that Art
Deco is a "support group troll", simpleton. The only thing
you've demonstrated is that you are incapable of constructing
logical arguments when someone disagrees with your opinion. It
took you very little time to embrace the pathetic argument of
last resort in a serious debate: ad hominem.
Congratulations.
OREO Jackson
All Hael teh Coffeegrrls! VVRRRRRRRROOOOOOOM!!!
Jade
Kali
c...@green.rahul.net said:
: In article <1mapt29l9dil4qcb9...@4ax.com>,
Yay, Charlotte! VRRROOOOOOOOOOOOMM!!!!
nightbat
OREO Jackson wrote:
nightbat
Jade, Indy Base One is squarely based on the Earth ground and
ready for advanced Sean Race First Official Landing clearance. The 21th
(Twin Headed) Century love boys Deco/Ducky freaks can lament all they
want to but Darla is coming. The alien auk genetic experiment gone wild
will be dealt with and other sinister outlaw Gray tempering abated. At
first we researcher Team thought widespread but minor Earth human gay
propensity was due to major and historical lead poisoning in the
environment but now we know better. For the most extreme cases, like the
auk coffeeboys Deco/Ducky ones and others, it's not only systematic lead
contamination pollution but failed non stimulated human Earth scientist
found junk gene bio access deficiency.
It's well known it takes a hard man to make a soft chicken, but those
two auk birds are a breed apart of profound stupidity to the
un-imaginary 10^infinity order, what the heck!
back to the lab,
the nightbat
BS meter needle pings whenever all wet coffeeboy posts
Phineas T Puddleduck
nightbat <nigh...@home.ffni.com> wrote:
> Jade, Indy Base One is squarely based on the Earth ground and
> ready for advanced Sean Race First Official Landing clearance.
Long wait.
The 21th
> (Twin Headed) Century love boys Deco/Ducky freaks can lament all they
> want to but Darla is coming. The alien auk genetic experiment gone wild
> will be dealt with and other sinister outlaw Gray tempering abated.
BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
At
> first we researcher Team thought widespread but minor Earth human gay
> propensity was due to major and historical lead poisoning in the
> environment but now we know better. For the most extreme cases, like the
> auk coffeeboys Deco/Ducky ones and others, it's not only systematic lead
> contamination pollution but failed non stimulated human Earth scientist
> found junk gene bio access deficiency.
>
More gay lames. Remember NB, unlike you I am MARRIED. I have a real woman.
> It's well known it takes a hard man to make a soft chicken, but those
> two auk birds are a breed apart of profound stupidity to the
> un-imaginary 10^infinity order, what the heck!
nightbat
Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
> In article <af36d$45de119d$46e3a6bc$32...@COMTECK.COM>,
> nightbat <nigh...@home.ffni.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Jade, Indy Base One is squarely based on the Earth ground and
>>ready for advanced Sean Race First Official Landing clearance.
>
>
> Long wait.
>
> The 21th
>
>>(Twin Headed) Century love boys Deco/Ducky freaks can lament all they
>>want to but Darla is coming. The alien auk genetic experiment gone wild
>>will be dealt with and other sinister outlaw Gray tempering abated.
>
>
> BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA
>
> At
>
>>first we researcher Team thought widespread but minor Earth human gay
>>propensity was due to major and historical lead poisoning in the
>>environment but now we know better. For the most extreme cases, like the
>>auk coffeeboys Deco/Ducky ones and others, it's not only systematic lead
>>contamination pollution but failed non stimulated human Earth scientist
>>found junk gene bio access deficiency.
>>
> Daffy Ducky
>
> More Captain brilliance. Remember NB, unlike you I am MARRIED. I have a real woman.
>
>
nightbat
Married, so what for so are allot of now out of the closet gay
actors, pastors, sports players, etc. they just sometimes swing both
ways. Your tooting means nothing compared to profound real Earth Science
Team Officers. Stunning beautiful Sean Sil is real and does it all, stop
salivating over lucky Science Officers.
>>It's well known it takes a hard man to make a soft chicken, but those
>>two auk birds are a breed apart of profound stupidity to the
>>un-imaginary 10^infinity order, what the heck!
behave,
the nightbat
Jade hasn't said anything about this nym yet...
we know it is because you are an alcoholic in remission that you value those
groups.
"Alcoholism is a disease, but it's like the only disease that you can get
yelled at for having. "Dammit, Otto, you're an alcoholic." "Dammit, Otto,
you have lupus." One of those two doesn't sound right." - mitch hedberg
--
Jade hasn't said anything about this nym yet...
> Sub-freakin-scribe!!!1!
>
> Charlotte (and VROOOOOM!!!!!)
your wet/dry vac has warnings about using it for sexual stimulation.
Art Deco
little napoleon is back to his post editing, how sweet.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert
Art Deco
Art Deco
>In article <8a03f$45dd3de3$46e3a6b0$27...@COMTECK.COM>,
> nightbat <nigh...@home.ffni.com> wrote:
>
>> Sean Monaghan wrote:
>>
>> > Kali <ka...@powder.keg> wrote in
>> > news:eri312$ajj$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>> >
>> >
>> >>In <E2E98DD993823@C7ADCA2>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
>> >>said:
>> >>
>> >>: Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without breaking a
>> >>: hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support
>> >>: groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
>> >>
>> >>Which support groups? Evidence?
>> >
>> >
>> > alt.astronomy - It's a de facto support-group for silly coffeeboys in
>> > denial.
>> >
>
>
>Oh look, frootbat poast-edits!
How profound.
Art Deco
>In <E2E98DE8D0D33@C7A2608>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
>said:
>: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
>:
>: > In <E2E98DE7EBAA3@C7AFBFA>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
>: > said:
>: >: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
>: >:
>: >: >: Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without breaking
>: a
>: >: >: hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support
>: >: >: groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
>: >: >
>: >: > Which support groups? Evidence?
>: >:
>: >: Google is your friend, hon.
>: >:
>: >: Just do an advanced search on group:*.support.* author:"Art Deco" and
>: >: behold the results. Several pages worth.
>: >
>: > You made the claim, the onus is on you to back it up.
>:
>: Just did. Or do you not know how to use Google Groups Advanced Search?
>: Do I need to spoon feed li'l baby a URL to the search results?
>:
>: (I'm guessing that you'd refuse to follow any URL I post. But the only
>: people who don't know how to use GGAS are the profoundly retarded, so the
>: URL issue is -- or should be -- moot in your case.)
>:
>: > I'm just as certain there were inadvertent followups
>:
>: Are you actually trying to justify support group trolling, or are you
>: claiming that he's too fucking stupid to check the xpost list before
>: submitting an article?
>
>Following up to threads that are consistently crossposted (by
>kooks, e.g. Micheal Baldwin Bruce and many others) to a support
>group is not the same thing as trolling a support group. Do you
>need to have this explained to you?
>
>I could Google all day and not find *one* post where Art Deco
>has trolled a support group.
>
>Kali
Note that bowturd/notbowturd, aka the greasy spectre out of the tomb of
the unknown sockpuppet, aka "malscribe", accused me of "trolling
support groups" here:
Message-ID: <E2E98DBEAFC33@C7A27A6>
Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology, alt.christnet.christianlife,
alt.bible.prophecy, alt.atheism, alt.usenet.kooks
The post in question:
Message-ID: <180220071739207388%er...@caballista.org>
Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology, alt.christnet.christianlife,
alt.bible.prophecy, alt.messianic, alt.atheism, alt.usenet.kooks,
comp.os.os2.advocacy, alt.astronomy
Therefore by using ko0k reasoning, alt.messianic, comp.os.os2.advocacy,
and alt.astronomy are all "support" newsgroups.
When this little inconvenient fact was displayed for all usenet to see,
the little weasel was forced to post-edit his/her/its way to freedom:
Message-ID: <E2E98DC5E0FD3@C7AE688>
I certainly hope my little fanboi has never posted anything to any of
these froups. Let's [tinu] check it out:
Results 1 - 1 of 1 for group:comp.os.os2.advocacy author:malscribe
Results 1 - 1 of 1 for group:alt.messianic author:malscribe
Results 1 - 3 of 3 for group:alt.astronomy author:malscribe
Oopsie! Hypocrisy exposed.
And the little snuhtard still doesn't understand what "trolling support
groups" means.
Art Deco
>I've made three things crystal clear for you: (a) Why troll xposts to
>support groups are just as disruptable as trolling them directly. (b) Why
>the "I wasn't paying attention" is not a defense. (c) Experiences with
>others that seemed to suggest that they agree that xposting to support
>groups is wrong.
>
>You simply chose to disregard ALL of that, because your personal definition
>of "support group trolling" is narrow enough.to permit a certain degree of
>such trolling. Apparently, you care more about trolls than about the
>people who might use the group as a critical part of their support
>structure.
>
>> The only thing
>> you've demonstrated is that you are incapable of constructing
>> logical arguments when someone disagrees with your opinion. It
>> took you very little time to embrace the pathetic argument of
>> last resort in a serious debate: ad hominem.
>
>Blah, blah, blah. You're wrong, and you're spanked. Feel free to keep
>crying about it for several days, though, because bawling spankards give me
>a warm, happy feeling.
No post edit this time, bubba?
Art Deco
Assuming it isn't first squashed by an incoming cometH dooooooooooomoid.
>The 21th
>(Twin Headed) Century love boys Deco/Ducky freaks can lament all they
*ding* <tips sombrero>
>want to but Darla is coming.
OK, this explains the overpowering smell of herring.
>The alien auk genetic experiment gone wild
Evidence, please?
>will be dealt with and other sinister outlaw Gray tempering abated. At
>first we researcher Team thought widespread but minor Earth human gay
>propensity was due to major and historical lead poisoning in the
>environment but now we know better.
Yeah, that Grey brain implant you got early on has ceased to function
correctly, rendering you into a lying, laming snuhtard.
>For the most extreme cases, like the
>auk coffeeboys Deco/Ducky ones and others, it's not only systematic lead
*ding* <tips sombrero>
>contamination pollution but failed non stimulated human Earth scientist
>found junk gene bio access deficiency.
English, please?
>
>It's well known it takes a hard man to make a soft chicken,
Only in frootbatville.
>but those
>two auk birds are a breed apart of profound stupidity to the
>un-imaginary 10^infinity order, what the heck!
alt.astronomy: all lames, all the time.
>
> back to the lab,
> the nightbat
>
>BS meter needle pings whenever all wet coffeeboy posts
I think Darla has a leak -- time to break out the vinyl repair kit,
napoleon.
Art Deco
"frootbat! frootbat!"
"he lames he lames and he lames some more!"
"frootbat! frootbat!"
"he lames he lames and he lames some more!"
Sing it!
Art Deco
>Art Deco wrote:
>
>> Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:26:03 -0600, "John \"C\""
>>><hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Deco
>>>
>>>Puddles Ducky just can't shake that Deco obsession, eh?
>>
>>
>> He has a fancy for him.
>>
>
>Coffeeboys - denying reality since day one -- nightbat
>"Doctor, what do we do with these clueless auk orphans?"
>"Put them with the rest of the born losers"
Bravo, ko0k! Hitting the campaign trail hard just before the polls
open next week.
nightbat
> nightbat <nigh...@home.ffni.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Kali wrote:
>>
>>
>>>In <Xns98DE8C3C...@204.153.244.156>, Sean Monaghan
>>>se...@alcatroll.com said:
>>>: Kali <ka...@powder.keg> wrote in
>>>: news:eri312$ajj$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>:
>>>: > In <E2E98DD993823@C7ADCA2>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
>>>: > said:
>>>: >
>>>: >: Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without breaking a
>>>: >: hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support
>>>: >: groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
>>>: >
>>>: > Which support groups? Evidence?
>>>:
>>>: alt.astronomy - It's a de facto non support-group for coffeeboys in denial.
>>>
>>>So "Good ship Darlapop" is new slang for support group. Makes
>>>sense to me, esp. since the famous Captain nightbat is the commanding
>>>officer.
>>>Thanks, Sean. I learn something new every day on the Usernets.
>>>
>>>Kali
>>
>>Coffeeboys - denying reality since day one -- nightbat
>>"Doctor, what do we do with these clueless auk orphans?"
>>"Put them with the rest of the born losers"
> Bart Devo
>
> little napoleon is back to his post editing , how sweet.
>
Translation: I feel so inferior to profound Earth Science Team Officers,
someone help me please!
nightbat
>>SAD - got it, oh winged Captain of the night?
>>
>>Jade
> Bart Devo
>
> subtract the 'S'.
>
Translation: Everyone knows coffeeboys can't really add or substract,
they just learn to bluff it, one lump or two?
Coffeeboy-To err is human, to award cover it up pure coffeeboy--nightbat
nightbat
> Phineas T Puddleduck <phineasp...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>In article <8a03f$45dd3de3$46e3a6b0$27...@COMTECK.COM>,
>>nightbat <nigh...@home.ffni.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Sean Monaghan wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Kali <ka...@powder.keg> wrote in
>>>>news:eri312$ajj$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In <E2E98DD993823@C7ADCA2>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
>>>>>said:
>>>>>
>>>>>: Nah. Old geezers can't run for shit, at least not without breaking a
>>>>>: hip or having a heart attack. But he's fond of trolling support
>>>>>: groups, and nobody ever broke a hip doing that.
>>>>>
>>>>>Which support groups? Evidence?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>alt.astronomy - It's a de facto un-support-group for silly coffeeboys in
>>>>denial.
>>>>
>>
>>
>>Oh look, the Captain profoundly posts!
> Bart Devo
>
> How profound of my favorite Captain.
nightbat
> Bart Devo
>
> Assuming it isn't first squashed by an incoming cometH dooooooooooomoid.
nightbat
Clue: The Seans mission is to rescue those worthy of rescue.
>>The 21th
>>(Twin Headed) Century love boys Deco/Ducky freaks can lament all they
>
>
> *ding* <tips mothers made sombrero>
>
>>want to but Darla is coming.
> Bar Devo
>
> OK, this explains the playing with myself overpowering smell of my herring nano diapers.
>
>>The alien auk genetic experiment gone wild
> Bart Devo
>
> Evidence, please?
nightbat
That's easy, your never changed forbidden nano diapers!
>>will be dealt with and other sinister outlaw Gray tempering abated. At
>>first we researcher Team thought widespread but minor Earth human gay
>>propensity was due to major and historical lead poisoning in the
>>environment but now we know better.
> Bart Devo
>
> Yeah, that Grey brain implant I got early on has ceased to function
> correctly, rendering me into a lying, laming snuhtard.
>
>
>>For the most extreme cases, like the
>>auk coffeeboys Deco/Ducky ones and others, it's not only systematic lead
>
>
> *ding* <tips mothers made sombrero>
>
>>contamination pollution but failed non stimulated human Earth scientist
>>found junk gene bio access deficiency.
> Bart Devo
>
> English, please?
Translation: My 6th grade drop out education doesn't permit me to fully
understand profound Earth Science Team Officers.
>>It's well known it takes a hard man to make a soft chicken,
> Bart Devo
>
> Only in my gay Ducky wildest fantasy imagined frootbatville.
>>but those
>>two auk birds are a breed apart of profound stupidity to the
>>un-imaginary 10^infinity order, what the heck!
> Bart Devo
>
> alt.astronomy: all lames, all the time, because I can't decipher the profound science being presented.
>> back to the lab,
>> the nightbat
>>
>>BS meter needle pings whenever all wet coffeeboy posts
> Bart Devo
>
> I think Darla has a leak -- time to break out the vinyl repair kit,
> napoleon.
>
nightbat
Get your respectful Science Officers correct busboy in
training, Officer Bert's Britney doll may leak, but beautiful Seans full
lips suck, so dream on coffeeboy!
nightbat
Legends are always sung about like Davy, Elvis, and John. and there is
only one real nightbat, net Captain king of the new space frontier.
The genesis project is real, we can restore and give rebirth to planets
Coffeeboy-To err is human, to award cover it up pure coffeeboy-nightbat
nightbat
> nightbat <nigh...@home.ffni.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Art Deco wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Fred Hall <fkh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:26:03 -0600, "John \"C\""
>>>><hones...@centurytel.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Deco
>>>>
>>>>Puddles Ducky just can't shake that Deco obsession, eh?
>>>
>>>
>>>He has a fancy for him.
>>>
>>
>>Coffeeboys - denying reality since day one -- nightbat
>>"Doctor, what do we do with these clueless auk orphans?"
>>"Put them with the rest of the born losers"
> Bart Devo
>
> Bravo, Ducky! Hitting the campaign trail hard just before the polls
> open next week. Vote for Deco clueless wonder of the 21th (twin headed) century.
OREO Jackson
this nym yet..." <ja...@netkooks.org> wrote:
I said something about that name a long tyme ago.
>Charlotte L. Blackmer wrote:
>
>> Sub-freakin-scribe!!!1!
>>
>> Charlotte (and VROOOOOM!!!!!)
>
>your wet/dry vac has warnings about using it for sexual stimulation.
>
>--
>jade hasn't said anything about my new sig, either.
>
Yes I did.
Jade
Kali
: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
:
: Nonsense. It's about accepting (or trying not to accept) responsibility
: for breaking rules.
:
: > False analogy. You lose. Next?
:
: Don't blame me if it went over your head and caused you to make a fool of
: yourself.
:
: > <makes note to self: consider the potential of all malscribe's
: > discussion/and/or simply argumentum ad misericordiam; flush
: > twice>
: >
: >: > That's kooky.
: >:
: >: Suggesting that one should try to be responsible enough follow simple
: >: rules (like not fucking with support groups) is not kooky. It's
: >: called maturity -- a concept that is apparently alien to you.
: >
: > Wow this one's a beauty of illogic.
: "Responsibility" and "maturity" aren't in your vocabulary, huh. That
: explains a lot.
:
: > Mainly argumentum ad hominem.
: >
: > You lose. Next?
:
: I'm guessing this your "white flag"; i.e., how you respond when you've been
: spanked and cannot think of anything better to say.
:
: >: >: >: >: to the support group has the same effect as trolling the
: For the millionth time: The "I didn't notice" argument is not a defense for
: posting troll shit to support groups, except for the newest of noobs.
:
: > a support group in response to a troll. This single part of my
: > considers the magnitude of any disruption to be minimal, or one
: > is welcome in the support group, or one wishes to assert a
: > topical argument, or... and depends on one's definition of
: > "trolling" and "distruption" and the context of the situation.
: Uh-huh. In other words, it's only "trolling" in your world if a post
: specifically targets somebody and results in a big flame war or something.
: Sounds to me like you're just trying to define loopholes to excuse
: inappropriate behavior. I'm guessing that a quick check of your posting
: history would reveal the reason why.
:
: > Argumentum ad speculum, you lose.
:
: Translation: You're spanked.
:
: >: (Your "didn't notice" excuse is not a
: >: a week.)
: >
: > You attacked a single, less relevant component of my argument
: > and you still can't refute it. Your opinion remains an opinion,
: > and nothing more. Next?
:
: excuse. A bullshit excuse.
:
: >
: >: >: Which is crap.
: disruption of support groups with trollish xposts.
:
: >: >: > Your straw man?
:
: If you can convince me that "kookologists" do not follow-up to kooks for
: the sole purpose of trolling them into qualifying for kook awards, then I
: will reconsider my analysis of the posts referenced above. ...Good luck,
: hon.
:
: (You might as well wave your white flag here, too, assuming you even bother
: to follow-up.)
:
: >: >: >: >: You mean where he specifically trolled a support group reg
: I've made three things crystal clear for you: (a) Why troll xposts to
: others that seemed to suggest that they agree that xposting to support
:
: You simply chose to disregard ALL of that, because your personal definition
: of "support group trolling" is narrow enough.to permit a certain degree of
: such trolling. Apparently, you care more about trolls than about the
: structure.
:
: > The only thing
: > logical arguments when someone disagrees with your opinion. It
: > took you very little time to embrace the pathetic argument of
: > last resort in a serious debate: ad hominem.
: Blah, blah, blah. You're wrong, and you're spanked. Feel free to keep
: a warm, happy feeling.
In summary:
You've modified your definition of Art Deco's crossposting from
"trolling support groups" to "crossposting trollish posts".
Certainly this is more reasonable (thus defendable) argument.
I reject the rest of your arguments on this topic because they
are illogical if not downright dishonest, and you seem incapable
or unwilling to recognize your errors in reasoning. Therefore,
there is no point in wasting time on further (serious)
discussion with you.
As to your fantasies of spanking me: No, you may not date me.
malscribe
Exactly the same thing, IMO. The wording is slightly different but the
meaning isn't.
> I reject the rest of your arguments on this topic because they
> are illogical
To you, because you're a dumbass.
> if not downright dishonest, and you seem incapable
> or unwilling to recognize your errors in reasoning. Therefore,
> there is no point in wasting time on further (serious)
> discussion with you.
What a HUGE surprise. You started waving the white flag a long time ago.
> As to your fantasies of spanking me: No, you may not date me.
Keep crying. It's funny.
[XNA removed, all material retained] ...Might as well carve your failure
in stone, to secure your everlasting shame. Don't be surprised if this
comes back to haunt you in future flame wars.
Kali
er...@caballista.org said:
:
: >In <E2E98DE8D0D33@C7A2608>, malscribe rogue...@rotted.pencil
: >said:
[...]
: >I could Google all day and not find *one* post where Art Deco
: >has trolled a support group.
: >
: >Kali
:
: Note that bowturd/notbowturd, aka the greasy spectre out of the tomb of
: the unknown sockpuppet,
Definitely. Snuh logic.
A GKF past or future winner, either way.
: aka "malscribe", accused me of "trolling
: support groups" here:
:
: Message-ID: <E2E98DBEAFC33@C7A27A6>
: Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology, alt.christnet.christianlife,
: alt.bible.prophecy, alt.atheism, alt.usenet.kooks
:
: The post in question:
:
: Message-ID: <180220071739207388%er...@caballista.org>
: Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology, alt.christnet.christianlife,
: alt.bible.prophecy, alt.messianic, alt.atheism, alt.usenet.kooks,
: comp.os.os2.advocacy, alt.astronomy
:
: Therefore by using ko0k reasoning, alt.messianic, comp.os.os2.advocacy,
: and alt.astronomy are all "support" newsgroups.
:
: When this little inconvenient fact was displayed for all usenet to see,
: the little weasel was forced to post-edit his/her/its way to freedom:
:
: Message-ID: <E2E98DC5E0FD3@C7AE688>
lol, and love the pretend hammer. It goes nicely with his
pretend police badge.
: I certainly hope my little fanboi has never posted anything to any of
: these froups. Let's [tinu] check it out:
:
: Results 1 - 1 of 1 for group:comp.os.os2.advocacy author:malscribe
:
: Results 1 - 1 of 1 for group:alt.messianic author:malscribe
:
: Results 1 - 3 of 3 for group:alt.astronomy author:malscribe
:
: Oopsie! Hypocrisy exposed.
:
: And the little snuhtard still doesn't understand what "trolling support
: groups" means.
I think he knows what it means, and enjoys the misrepresentation
for whatever trolling value it can get him. He has, however,
modified his position to "crossposting trollish posts", which is
a step in the direction of cluefulness. But with his reasoning
skills, dishonesty, and, um, other predelictions, he's likely to
remain in that murky snuh lagoon near the shores of kook island
for some time.
Kali
: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
:
Words have meaning. And you know it, which is why you clung to
the former wording so stubbornly.
: > I reject the rest of your arguments on this topic because they
: > are illogical
:
: To you, because you're a dumbass.
:
: > if not downright dishonest, and you seem incapable
: > or unwilling to recognize your errors in reasoning. Therefore,
: > there is no point in wasting time on further (serious)
: > discussion with you.
:
: What a HUGE surprise. You started waving the white flag a long time ago.
:
: > As to your fantasies of spanking me: No, you may not date me.
:
: Keep crying. It's funny.
:
: [XNA removed, all material retained] ...Might as well carve your failure
: in stone, to secure your everlasting shame. Don't be surprised if this
: comes back to haunt you in future flame wars.
:
"you're a dumbass"
"you're crying"
"I spanked you"
"[threats]"
Loser speak, loser.
Phineas T Puddleduck
nightbat <nigh...@home.ffni.com> wrote:
> nightbat
>
> Married, so what for so are allot of now out of the closet gay
> actors, pastors, sports players, etc. they just sometimes swing both
> ways. Your tooting means nothing compared to profound real Earth Science
> Team Officers. Stunning beautiful Sean Sil is real and does it all, stop
> salivating over lucky Science Officers.
>
Sil doesn't exist NB. You're just masturbating over pictures of walrus's again.
Phineas T Puddleduck
Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
> >
> >Oh look, frootbat poast-edits!
>
> How profound.
Sign of a true Earth Science Ossifer.
Phineas T Puddleduck
Art Deco <er...@caballista.org> wrote:
> >Coffeeboys - denying reality since day one -- nightbat
> >"Doctor, what do we do with these clueless auk orphans?"
> >"Put them with the rest of the born losers"
>
> "frootbat! frootbat!"
> "he lames he lames and he lames some more!"
> "frootbat! frootbat!"
> "he lames he lames and he lames some more!"
>
> Sing it!
Lets take it to the bridge!!
Phineas T Puddleduck
nightbat <nigh...@home.ffni.com> wrote:
> > Bart Devo
> >
> > little napoleon is back to his post editing , how sweet.
> >
>
> Translation: I feel so inferior to profound Earth Science Team Officers,
> someone help me please!
BWAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHA
Alien girlfriend still MIA loser?
Kali
Phineas T Puddleduck phineasp...@googlemail.com said:
: In article <e511d$45de35ed$46e3a6bc$14...@COMTECK.COM>,
: nightbat <nigh...@home.ffni.com> wrote:
:
: > nightbat
: >
: > Married, so what for so are allot of now out of the closet gay
: > actors, pastors, sports players, etc. they just sometimes swing both
: > ways. Your tooting means nothing compared to profound real Earth Science
: > Team Officers. Stunning beautiful Sean Sil is real and does it all, stop
: > salivating over lucky Science Officers.
: >
:
: Sil doesn't exist NB. You're just masturbating over pictures of walrus's again.
I thought Sil was a manatee? Dolphin?
Phineas T Puddleduck
nightbat <nigh...@home.ffni.com> wrote:
>
> Legends are always sung about like Davy, Elvis, and John. and there is
> only one real nightbat, net Captain king of the new space frontier.
BWAAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA
Kali
: Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
:
: > er...@caballista.org said:
:
: [filth clipped for the sake of decency]
You act like you're hurting. Are you hurting, socky?
Text restored:
In <ern723$dtg$4...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>, Kali
ka...@powder.keg said:
: In <220220072155352275%er...@caballista.org>, Art Deco
: Eww, a habitual support group troll and support group troll defender
: slurping each other right out in public. That's fucking gross.
Who knows, this campaign of yours could win you a Pickett or
even a Custer, unless someone comes along and verifies that you
are the sock of a GKF'd kook.
But I need you to get just a little bit more foamy, first. Can
you do that for Kali? Or will you simply archive the post so
some other pedestrian fool like you can be my scratching post at
a later date?
nightbat
Kali wrote:
> In <phineaspuddleduck-F...@news.octanews.com>,
> Phineas T Puddleduck phineasp...@googlemail.com said:
> : In article <e511d$45de35ed$46e3a6bc$14...@COMTECK.COM>,
> : nightbat <nigh...@home.ffni.com> wrote:
> :
> : > nightbat
> : >
> : > Married, so what for so are allot of now out of the closet gay
> : > actors, pastors, sports players, etc. they just sometimes swing both
> : > ways. Your tooting means nothing compared to profound real Earth Science
> : > Team Officers. Stunning beautiful Sean Sil is real and does it all, stop
> : > salivating over lucky Science Officers.
> : Daffy Ducky
> :
> : Sil doesn't exist NB. You're just masturbating over pictures of walrus's again.
> Kali
> I thought Sil was a manatee? Dolphin?
>
> Kali
nightbat
Sorry to disappoint you clueless ones, but my net beautiful
Sil, is per Sean rescued pilot Ollie reportedly the most stunning
Universe being ever created next to her lovely mother Darla. And no they
are not Earth manatees or Dolphins silly, but from other far distant
world sea evolved mammal species not unlike ourselves, sheesh! With
powers far beyond those of Earth mortal men. "Look up in the sky, is it
a bird, a plane, or Superman?" No, it's alt.astronomy famous Team
Captain nightbat and his Angelic vixen Sean bride Sil with Starship
nightbat, fighting for truth, justice, and the old American way. Run
coffeeboys you're time is up! Round them up Officer Warhol for Titan
Moon Base processing.
ponder on,
the nightbat
nightbat
malscribe wrote:
> Kali farted out this reeking cloud:
>
>
>>In <220220072155352275%er...@caballista.org>, Art Deco
>>er...@caballista.org said:
>
>
> [filth clipped for the sake of decency]
>
> Eww, a habitual support group troll and support group troll defender
> slurping each other right out in public. That's fucking gross.
nightbat
Thank you malscribe at least there are some other decent net
posters willing to stand up to the gross mentally deficient likes of the
clueless despicable coffeeboys. Fly high and straight.
cheers,
the nightbat
OREO Jackson
wrote:
So's I can shoot you all down with mah flying saucer from HELL!
VVVVVVVVVVVRRRRRRROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!!!!!!!!!!
Jade