Kimberly Kay is a "Carpet-Muncher"...............
John "C"
"Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message
news:glvq1u$ogu$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> In article <71f42b6a3e1941ed...@pseudo.borked.net>,
> "Atlas Bugged" <atlasbug...@gmail.com> hid behind a remailer
> and said...
> >
> > marcia tard wrote:
> > > If you don't want to be referred to as "Ass Bug,"....
> > > I suggest you write/speak to me with respect from now on.
> > > If you can't manage that, I doubt being dubbed "Cuntarcia"
> > > ... will bother me as much as being called "Ass Bug"
> > > bothers you. Your choice.
> >
> > nothing you post bothers me, you fat cunt prozakian drug whore.
> > respect has to be earned, and your usenet ways just don't cut
> > the mustard.
> >
> > go stick a hot buttered screwdriver up your fat ass.
> >
> Misogynist and racist. The more you post, the more you reveal of
> your character.
> --
> Kali
Skank and Lezzy. The more you post, the more you reveal of
your character, Kimberly Kay Barnard of Wisc.
--
Your Pal For life,
HJ
John "C"
"Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message
> In article <0l97o4l44iliai198...@4ax.com>, a6ahlyv02
> @sneakemail.com says...
> > On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:17:57 -0500, in the land of alt.usenet.kooks,
> > Kali <ka...@happy.joy> got double secret probation for writing:
> >
> > >Email if you like.
> >
> > Where is my '61 LaTour?
>
> Too rich for me, honey bunches.
> --
> Kali
Faggot !!
--
Your Pal,
HJ
John "C"
"Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message
> In article <feb6674a-858f-47c2-a5e5-
> 26203d...@a39g2000prl.googlegroups.com>, marcia...@gmail.com
> says...
> > On Jan 30, 4:05 pm, Kali <k...@happy.joy> wrote:
> > > In article <71f42b6a3e1941edd5fa32eadfe3b...@pseudo.borked.net>,
> > > "Atlas Bugged" <atlasbuggedbys...@gmail.com> hid behind a remailer
> > > and said...
> > >
> > > > marcia tard wrote:
> > > > > If you don't want to be referred to as "Ass Bug,"....
> > > > > I suggest you write/speak to me with respect from now on.
> > > > > If you can't manage that, I doubt being dubbed "Cuntarcia"
> > > > > ... will bother me as much as being called "Ass Bug"
> > > > > bothers you. Your choice.
> > >
> > > > nothing you post bothers me, you fat cunt prozakian drug whore.
> > > > respect has to be earned, and your usenet ways just don't cut
> > > > the mustard.
> > >
> > > > go stick a hot buttered screwdriver up your fat ass.
> > >
> > > Misogynist and racist. The more you post, the more you reveal of
> > > your character.
> > > --
> > > Kali
> >
>
> He responded directly... are you sure?
>
> > Uvf anzr vf Mraba Xevfyngl, ubzr tebhc vf gur Pyrirynaq Oebjaf
> > sbbgonyy tebhc. V arrq gb ynl ybj sbe njuvyr; gur thl vf n erny ahg
> > naq yvirf va zl bja fgngr.
> >
> Take care. Email if you like.
> --
> Kali
Why would anyone want to e-mail a Skank like yourself, Kimberly Kay ??
--
Your Pal For Life,
HJ
John "C"
"atlas bugged" <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2httn5....@news.alt.net...
>
> Human values. E-mail me for further info.
>
> Always here to help,
> Your Pal,
> Atlas Bugged
Thanks You for all your help with the "Gay Caballer" Trash in
"alt.usenet.kooks" !!
One day this place might be safe for "Nice & Normal" folks to post !!
--
John C.
atlas bugged
"John "C"" <hones...@centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:S92dnShzTroVwBnU...@centurytel.net...
We thought we had problems like the AUKtards solved when we passed "Megan's
Law" 20 years ago here in Jersey.
I can't believe I'm still trying to take out the garbage.
Maybe it's true that roaches will be the only ones to survive a nuke
exchange.
Is it just my killfile, or have things seemed a little less crappy around
here lately?
>
marcia
wrote:
> "John "C"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote in message
>
> news:S92dnShzTroVwBnU...@centurytel.net...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "atlas bugged" <atlasbuggedbys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:2httn5....@news.alt.net...
>
> >> "Kali" <k...@happy.joy> wrote in message
> >>news:gm05b5$1cs$4...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> >> > In article <feb6674a-858f-47c2-a5e5-
You have a unique and self-serving definition of "garbage" and
"roaches," Mr. Hypocrite.
And so far, all you've shown is that you can shoot fish in a barrel,
since I naively left myself wide open to your research and its
consequences. You should know, and I suspect you do, that the person
behind the anonymous remailer is seriously mentally ill. How does
exploiting a mentally ill person to do your dirty work mesh with your
so-called "human values"?
[Space for denial here]
Gregory Hall
Up until recently there has been a concerted effort by the DataBasux crowd
of criminals and conspiring, criminal activity supporters to systematically
marginalize those of us who exposed the crimes of the unrepentant admin and
his ilk. Thanks to several of us sane folks getting together to battle this
conspiracy and to expose their ways and means, it's gotten so they are
losing supporters fast. They aren't getting their way like they used to.
They are failing fast.
I notice since some of us who are dedicated to justice and fairness have not
hesitated to point out how Kali, Rhonda, Marcia, Cannon, etc. are enabling
the creation of future victims of sex crimes on minors, they seem to have
toned down their support of the abusing DataBasux admin. This is a good
thing.
Do you remember when just about everybody smoked and a non-smoker couldn't
find any clean air to breath anywhere? Then the tables got turned so that
nowadays smokers are pretty much relegated to smoking rooms and areas . This
happened because public pressure was exerted whereby smokers were relegated
to the minority. Their nasty addiction was recognized for what it was -
dangerous to everybody's health. As such it will no longer be tolerated.
Similarly, the combined efforts of those of us who cannot abide haughty
criminals in denial who continue to make our children live in fear of sexual
assault have caused the Burnores of this world to lose face, which face they
have lied and schemed for years to bolster. The tipping point has been
reached. If such scum can't be relegated to prison where they belong at
least they can be labeled and exposed so a righteous public can shun and
decry them.
Thanks for your tireless work on behalf the victims of this type of heinous
crime by adults on minors. Kudos. Good luck finding a current physical
address. Somebody who flees one state to another where the sex offender
registration requirements are slacker and then continues to move from state
to state is somebody I sure wouldn't want to have as a neighbor. I would
move the minute I found out he was near by.
--
Gregory Hall
atlas bugged
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
news:2hufj0....@news.alt.net...
Why, thank you, and that was quite eloquent. <takes bow>
But the truth is, I ain't nothin' but a country lawyer and a small
businessman, with a wonderful staff, and all of them with families.
I'm going to protect myself and them in every imaginable way, using every
imaginable tool at my disposal.
That's a significant aspect that I think AUKtards simply don't get.
--
Captain Steven Hiller: "You think they have any idea what's about to happen
to them?"
David Levinson: "Not a chance in hell. Goodnight!"
- From the movie "Independence Day" (1996)
Duke: "What you lookin' at old man?"
Walt Kowalski: "Ever notice how you come across somebody once in a while you
shouldn't have fucked with? That's me."
- From the movie "Gran Torino" (2008)
And the sixties song, in case no AUKtard has figured it out yet, is "FWIW."
marcia
wrote:
> "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote in message
>
> news:2hufj0....@news.alt.net...
>
>
>
>
>
> > "atlas bugged" <atlasbuggedbys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:2hud6e....@news.alt.net...
>
> >> "John "C"" <honestj...@centurytel.net> wrote in message
> >>news:S92dnShzTroVwBnU...@centurytel.net...
>
> >>> "atlas bugged" <atlasbuggedbys...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:2httn5....@news.alt.net...
>
> >>>> "Kali" <k...@happy.joy> wrote in message
> >>>>news:gm05b5$1cs$4...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> >>>> > In article <feb6674a-858f-47c2-a5e5-
Pffft. Straw man. You and your family have never been in danger from
anyone here, especially me.
You're executing personal vendettas, and you know it. The sad thing
is, you're using other people to do your dirty work, including
exploiting one man who is seriously mentally ill (which you now can't
say you're unaware of), so you can't be connected to anything remotely
illegal, like stalking and harassment, despite being the likely
mastermind. And what protection do you offer them in return? Free
legal defense in the one state where you're licensed to practice?
Yet they look up to you like a hero. lol. There are none so blind as
those who will not see.
Gregory Hall
"marcia" <marcia...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ef19c167-bdf7-48db...@r41g2000prr.googlegroups.com...
<snippage of a hefty nature>
> Yet they look up to you like a hero. lol. There are none so blind as
> those who will not see.
Then open your eyes! Stop supporting registered sex offenders. Start
supporting their victims.
--
Gregory Hall
marcia
> "marcia" <marcia1234...@gmail.com> wrote in message
I do not, and will not, support unsubstantiated claims. I do not, and
will not, accept "documents" (note the scare quotes) posted on a check
forger's site as credible evidence of anything. I'm not making any
judgments unless and until I know the full story and circumstances
surrounding the alleged event, which is unlikely to happen.
I'm applying the same standards a jury would apply, which is only
fair. What you and "Atlas Bugged" are doing is neither fair nor
reasonable nor just, and likely at least some of your persecution
constitutes libel and harassment. I refuse to be a party to that.
As far as "supporting registered sex offenders" goes, I do not. I
helped a prosecutor in another state obtain a longer sentence for one
particular sex offender (he did not offend against anyone in my
family), and have personally kept tabs on him for years. Unlike you,
I've worked through sanctioned legal channels and haven't persecuted
or harassed the person.
Gregory Hall
Hmmm! Looks like I might've struck a nerve. If you refuse to believe actual
photocopies of official documents then just what WILL you believe? And why
not be consistent and refuse to believe Gary's lies?
Blaming everything on an alleged check forger doesn't cut it as far as I'm
concerned. Here's proof that the court records shown were purchased:
http://web.archive.org/web/20061010174028/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_1/Receipt.GIF
--
Gregory Hall
marcia
What makes you think they're "actual photocopies of official
documents"? The fact that they're posted on a check forger's site
*completely* undermines their credibility. The fact that at least one,
and possibly more, of the documents are "testimonials" from anonymous
parties who can't be tracked to real entities *completely* undermines
*their* credibility. You know how easy it is to frog someone and how
often it's done to those identified as "enemies."
Let me ask you this: "Atlas Bugged" has a PACER ID. Why hasn't *he*
provided access to details supporting his claim? Why has he relied on
information from a forger's site, rather than real legal data?
> then just what WILL you believe? And why
I would believe whatever is on file at the courthouse, but not copies
of what's purported to be on file. But let me make one thing clear: It
is NOT my intention to research Gary's background. Even if I knew the
*facts* of what happened, I still wouldn't use any damning
information, if any exists, to persecute him. Justice is the sole
purview of the courts and legal system, which have already dealt with
the situation, whatever it was.
The person I'm tracking is a serious *serial* offender, and I don't
harass him. Do you understand what I'm saying?
> not be consistent and refuse to believe Gary's lies?
What evidence do I have that Gary's told lies? None.
>
> Blaming everything on an alleged check forger doesn't cut it as far as I'm
> concerned. Here's proof that the court records shown were purchased: http://web.archive.org/web/20061010174028/archives.mfn.org/images/bat...
Your link is truncated and doesn't work.
Gregory Hall
Why did you truncate it, marcia? Don't want to see proof? Don't want to
believe you're looking at actual documents purchased from the courthouse?
Corrected:
http://web.archive.org/web/20061010174028/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_1/Receipt.GIF
Don't be afraid to view the truth.
--
Gregory Hall
atlas bugged
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
Notice the claim that *we're* crossing legal lines. But no one seems to
want to "work through sanctioned legal channels" to fix the horrors we've
inflicted.
Instead, I seem to be the bad guy because...wait for it...I'm working
through sanctioned legal channels!!!
>
>
> Hmmm! Looks like I might've struck a nerve.
Yep, both of us.
>If you refuse to believe actual photocopies of official documents then just
>what WILL you believe? And why not be consistent and refuse to believe
>Gary's lies?
I still haven't seen anyone dare to even deny the underlying events. They
seem to only say the docs are "unverified" or false, but no one seems to
deny Burnore did something that the criminal justice system regarded as
intolerable, and that a record of this was made.
They seem to just say, "hey, it wasn't like he did a biggie, it's more like
he smoked a joint, it ain't worth mentioning." And they seem to say we're
turning that into a conviction for selling cocaine, continuing with the
metaphor.
In fact, they've confirmed the underlying event. They have just said "no
biggie."
Yeah, no biggie. LOL. The daughter of his ex-girlfriend is probably
*still* trying to Listerine the taste of Gary's tongue from her mouth.
God knows what Mom's outcome was, both mentally and bacteriologically. Or
virologically. Yeeeeccchhh!!!
Now, Burnore infects the 'net with toxins. I have to admit I like him
better now, but the number of victims has risen exponentially.
>
> Blaming everything on an alleged check forger doesn't cut it as far as I'm
> concerned. Here's proof that the court records shown were purchased:
> http://web.archive.org/web/20061010174028/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_1/Receipt.GIF
Wow. I'll add it to my little "Gary Sig" Hundreds of Usenetizens have
visited them now, according to my link stats.
If Databasux is a business, and not a hobby as it appears, he'd have a clear
cause of action in court if anything I said was knowingly false.
"Sanctioned legal channels," you know...
<crickets>
marcia
I didn't do anything to truncate it. That happens when reading and
posting long URLs to/from Groups sometimes (where I'm reading from).
Don't want to see proof? Don't want to
> believe you're looking at actual documents purchased from the courthouse?
>
> Corrected:http://web.archive.org/web/20061010174028/archives.mfn.org/images/bat...
>
> Don't be afraid to view the truth.
The truth of what I see is a $7.00 receipt for *something* from Santa
Clara County Courthouse. This isn't proof of anything, Greg, even if
you wish it was. Let's assume it's a real receipt. How do you prove
it's connected in any way to Gary, or a report on Gary? How do you
prove that what was posted about Gary is information purchased from
the courthouse? The chain of evidence is broken; there's no case
number or any other identifier tying it to *anyone,* let alone Gary.
That's the truth.
Do you think this receipt would be allowed as evidence in a court of
law?
Do you think *anything* posted on a check forger's web site would be
allowed as evidence in a court of law?
Assuming you reached the correct conclusion, do you understand why all
of that would be excluded?
Do you think "Atlas Bugged" knows the information would be excluded?
I'm thinking yes, since he's allegedly an experience defense attorney
and all.
And again, where's that evidence from PACER? Why is "Atlas Bugged"
withholding that information?
Is it possible the information is privileged, meaning he can't legally
post it here? If that's the case, how would the check forger have
gotten the information from public records?
Is it possible the true facts of the case don't support the claims
made on the check forger's site?
It might be worthwhile to ask yourself how much your dislike/hatred/
anger/whatever you feel for Gary is damaging your ability to look at
this information objectively.
Why don't you ask "Atlas Bugged" why he hasn't posted information from
PACER?
marcia
wrote:
> "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote in message
>
> news:2hupji....@news.alt.net...
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Wow. I'll add it to my little "Gary Sig" Hundreds of Usenetizens have
> visited them now, according to my link stats.
>
> If Databasux is a business, and not a hobby as it appears, he'd have a clear
> cause of action in court if anything I said was knowingly false.
>
> "Sanctioned legal channels," you know...
>
> <crickets>
Having a cause of action and choosing to exercise legal action are not
synonymous. You're very good at manipulating people and their
perceptions; I'll give you that. That doesn't mean you're leading
people to draw *correct* conclusions, even if you're operating
*inside* the law.
I don't know what happened. I don't even know Gary's side of it, and
probably never will. The evidence presented, in the form presented, is
not *credible* and would never stand up in court, which you well know.
Why aren't you providing information from PACER?
<crickets>
Regardless, you *seem* to be trying to enlist people to *persecute*
Gary, and I'm not playing.
Obviously, others are willing to play. You cater to their self-
interests and appeal to their sense of moral outrage (especially when
they're already inclined to dislike him) using clever rhetoric. Like
an effective attorney, your objective is not illuminating the TRUTH,
but presenting an interpretation of the available information (whether
true or not) that supports your case.
And lucky you, you're not bound by the rules of a court, the oversight
of a judge or opposing counsel.
All you have to do is don your super-hero costume, and certain people
will fall in line. You have other methods of dealing with those who
oppose you.
*last post; s/b chain of custody.
Gregory Hall
Whoever put up that web page where it links to all the important details
<http://web.archive.org/web/20070402135000/http://archives.mfn.org/>
in the first place included a scan of the receipt just to show he didn't
make everything up.
>
> Do you think this receipt would be allowed as evidence in a court of
> law?
It would if the receipt number was recorded and tied to the documents it
actually bought.
>
> Do you think *anything* posted on a check forger's web site would be
> allowed as evidence in a court of law?
All I hear is "check forger." How am I supposed that's not just another
Burnore lie? Never is there any proof, even if he was a proven check forger,
that he forged those legal documents. You seem to be acting more on
'feelings' than logic.
>
> Assuming you reached the correct conclusion, do you understand why all
> of that would be excluded?
No, I do not. Courts often use convicted felons as 'snitch' witnesses in
courts of law. They even make deals with them for their testimony and their
testimony is considered valid.
>
> Do you think "Atlas Bugged" knows the information would be excluded?
> I'm thinking yes, since he's allegedly an experience defense attorney
> and all.
I can't speak for what Atlas Bugges knows.
>
> And again, where's that evidence from PACER? Why is "Atlas Bugged"
> withholding that information?
Beats me. He probably has good reason for doing so. Maybe he's not as 'mean'
as you wish to portray him. Same goes for me. I managed to photoshop the sex
offender registration document to the point where I could read Burnore's
social security number. I've looked it up and it does, indeed, belong to
him. How do you think the so-called 'check forger' managed to get that?
>
> Is it possible the information is privileged, meaning he can't legally
> post it here? If that's the case, how would the check forger have
> gotten the information from public records?
See receipt. He purchased copies of records that, at the time, obviously
were not sealed. That's not to say they aren't sealed now as the original
probationary period seems to have expired in the year 2000.
>
> Is it possible the true facts of the case don't support the claims
> made on the check forger's site?
It's possible but where are these 'true facts?' I'd like to read them and
compare and decide for myself.
>
> It might be worthwhile to ask yourself how much your dislike/hatred/
> anger/whatever you feel for Gary is damaging your ability to look at
> this information objectively.
I don't hate Gary. I just think he's a huge hypocrite and I like to rub his
nose in the fact.
>
> Why don't you ask "Atlas Bugged" why he hasn't posted information from
> PACER?
>
Because he probably wouldn't wish to tell me. Atlas Bugged is a free agent.
We don't conspire and we don't care about each other's business. Myself, I'm
attempting to put some balance in a one-sided Burnore obfuscation. Gary's
your typical liberal. He knows if a lie is repeated often enough people will
start believing it. I think that's where you're at.
I'm a good judge of character and I can tell you with all sincerity that
there is something about Gary that doesn't pass the smell test. I don't
whiff that unfortunate odor coming from Atlas Bugged's direction. And, for
what it's worth, yours either. I just think you're being loyal to the wrong
individual.
--
Gregory Hall
atlas bugged
news:gm2c0k$5q7$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
Oddly, they make an ass out of only you. Go figger.
>>
>>Instead, I seem to be the bad guy because...wait for it...I'm working
>>through sanctioned legal channels!!!
>
> See, you're either lying again or stupid. Sanctioned legal channels say
> you
> can't use the information you claimed you've gained in the way you are
> using
> it. It's illegal in CA, NC, NY, NJ and there's federal statute too.
Cite? <crickets> And what info? <crickets> And who's using it?
<crickets> And how are they using it? <crickets>
>
> But, since your defense will be yeah, I know it was all a lie so just sue
> me,
> you're off the hook. Right?
Defense? Defense to what? <crickets>
>>
>>>
>>> Hmmm! Looks like I might've struck a nerve.
>>
>>Yep, both of us.
>
> Only in your k00ky little minds.
>>
>>>If you refuse to believe actual photocopies of official documents then
>>>just
>>>what WILL you believe? And why not be consistent and refuse to believe
>>>Gary's lies?
>>
>>I still haven't seen anyone dare to even deny the underlying events.
>
> I do. There was no sexual assault and there was no sexual assault or
> assault
> on a minor. You CLAIM to be a lawyer. I believe you're LYING.
Well, is Rhonduh real? Or just a screedname? She posts through your
service and has conceded that you got in trouble with LE.
>
>
>>Yeah, no biggie. LOL. The daughter of his ex-girlfriend is probably
>>*still* trying to Listerine the taste of Gary's tongue from her mouth.
>>
>>God knows what Mom's outcome was, both mentally and bacteriologically. Or
>>virologically. Yeeeeccchhh!!!
>
> So now you're saying the daughter infected the mom? You're one sick fuck.
Reading comp issues? Talking about you.
And you call *me* a sick fuck? That would be the IKWYABWAI of all human
history. Call Guinness.
>
>>
>>Now, Burnore infects the 'net with toxins. I have to admit I like him
>>better now, but the number of victims has risen exponentially.
>>>
>>> Blaming everything on an alleged check forger doesn't cut it as far as
>>> I'm
>>> concerned. Here's proof that the court records shown were purchased:
>>> http://web.archive.org/web/20061010174028/archives.mfn.org/images/batch_1/Receipt.GIF
>>
>>Wow. I'll add it to my little "Gary Sig" Hundreds of Usenetizens have
>>visited them now, according to my link stats.
>
> Riiiiigght. Link stats? Fool.
Oh, I guess that takes care of any possible cause of action for you.
I'm wrong, nobody clicked my links, I'm a fool.
>
>>
>>If Databasux is a business,
>
> It's not, tardlett. DataBasix is.
Cite? Incorporation docs? <crickets>
>
>>and not a hobby as it appears, he'd have a clear
>>cause of action in court if anything I said was knowingly false.
>
> If? Heh. You know full well there was no sexual assault. You keep
> claiming
> there was.
How the fuck would I know anything but what I research?
"All I know is what I read in the papers." - Will Rogers
>
>>"Sanctioned legal channels," you know...
>
> Yeah, I know. I know all about it and now pretty much all about you. I
> know
> you're endangering my family.
I didn't even know you had one, and I assumed no women would ever associate
with you - at least not knowingly.
And since you're a documented liar, I still don't know.
>I know you hide behind a fake name in USENet.
No, fuckwit, my real birth name is Atlas J. Bugged. What ever made you
think it was a handle?
> I know you're a coward.
Yeah, go to www.coward.com and check my registration. Figured *someone*
ought to cite *something* once in a while.
>Tell me, bugged. Is your real name Novins and are you
> REALLY a lawyer in New Jersey?
Try to be a man for once in your life. We can easily exchange info.
Instead you beg me for my info like the barking poodle you are.
Guess you'd just take what you want - by force, if you could. Your history
suggests old habits die hard.
Here's all the info I have. If you say it's wrong, and want it "corrected,"
try crawling out from under your rock, asshole. Try growing a pair.
<http://glbcrimes.notlong.com> [GLB's official state record]
<http://gb1faq.notlong.com> [Online adversary's FAQ rundown, dated, but
still useful]
<http://gb2pic.notlong.com> [Mug shot and criminal specs]
<http://glbmegans.notlong.com> [Our boy had to register as a sex offender]
<http://gb4docs.notlong.com> [charging documents, specifying "molestation"]
<http://glb6teenrape.notlong.com> [GF-Mom's account of GLB's rape of 16 yo
daughter]
John "C"
IAWTP !!
--
John C.
atlas bugged
I do? What claim?
>>> >Why hasn't *he*
>>> > provided access to details supporting his claim?
What claim? I have an obligation to "provide access" to Usenet ghosts,
pedos, drunks, libelers, or even anyone I don't have a relationship with?
How's that work?
>>> >Why has he relied on
>>> > information from a forger's site, rather than real legal data?
cite/yawn
Experienced and cutting edge:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/31/washington/31scotus.html?_r=1
Exclusion is *so* yesterday.
>
> I can't speak for what Atlas Bugges knows.
>
>>
>> And again, where's that evidence from PACER? Why is "Atlas Bugged"
>> withholding that information?
>
> Beats me. He probably has good reason for doing so.
Oops. Never assume any part of a question posed by an AUKtard is true.
I'm not "withholding" anything, she's just saying I didn't do the research
*for* her lazy fat ass.
>Maybe he's not as 'mean' as you wish to portray him.
Nope. I'm mean. But only to those who reject reason as a means of
exchange.
In AUK, my desire is to be the worst nightmare of those who cross the line
where civil and moral law intersect. Yes, they do intersect sometimes.
>Same goes for me. I managed to photoshop the sex offender registration
>document to the point where I could read Burnore's social security number.
>I've looked it up and it does, indeed, belong to him. How do you think the
>so-called 'check forger' managed to get that?
No fair, you're using logic and reason. Bully!
>
>>
>> Is it possible the information is privileged, meaning he can't legally
>> post it here? If that's the case, how would the check forger have
>> gotten the information from public records?
>
> See receipt. He purchased copies of records that, at the time, obviously
> were not sealed. That's not to say they aren't sealed now as the original
> probationary period seems to have expired in the year 2000.
>
>>
>> Is it possible the true facts of the case don't support the claims
>> made on the check forger's site?
>
> It's possible but where are these 'true facts?' I'd like to read them and
> compare and decide for myself.
>
>>
>> It might be worthwhile to ask yourself how much your dislike/hatred/
>> anger/whatever you feel for Gary is damaging your ability to look at
>> this information objectively.
>
> I don't hate Gary. I just think he's a huge hypocrite and I like to rub
> his nose in the fact.
>
>>
>> Why don't you ask "Atlas Bugged" why he hasn't posted information from
>> PACER?
>>
>
> Because he probably wouldn't wish to tell me.
I probably would. I happily interact with folks who behave civilly,
articulate their thoughts well, and obey basic societal norms of conduct.
>Atlas Bugged is a free agent.
I am *not* a discontinued (if excellent) software program for reading
Usenet!!
> We don't conspire and we don't care about each other's business. Myself,
> I'm attempting to put some balance in a one-sided Burnore obfuscation.
> Gary's your typical liberal. He knows if a lie is repeated often enough
> people will start believing it. I think that's where you're at.
True.
John "C"
the
> documents that prove that you sodomized a dog and make sure there's
one of a
> receipt, it'll be legal proof that you did it, right?
> >
> >>
> >> Do you think this receipt would be allowed as evidence in a court
of
> >> law?
> >
> >It would if the receipt number was recorded and tied to the documents
it
> >actually bought.
>
one
> important part. In his narrative, he said sexual assault on a 16 year
old but
> the doc says annoying a 17 year old. Oops.
> >
> >>
> >> Do you think *anything* posted on a check forger's web site would
be
> >> allowed as evidence in a court of law?
> >
> >All I hear is "check forger."
>
>
> >How am I supposed that's not just another
> >Burnore lie?
>
Henny
> Youngman. A rather famous comedian. His accomplice was a relative of
> Youngman. Damn, are you that thick?
>
> >Never is there any proof, even if he was a proven check forger,
>
>
> >that he forged those legal documents.
>
>
> > You seem to be acting more on 'feelings' than logic.
>
what was
> the most important possession you ever had: Access to DataBasix.
>
> >>
> >> Assuming you reached the correct conclusion, do you understand why
all
> >> of that would be excluded?
> >
> >No, I do not. Courts often use convicted felons as 'snitch' witnesses
in
> >courts of law.
>
fraud.
>
> > They even make deals with them for their testimony and their
> >testimony is considered valid.
>
Forger:
> Yes. Lawyer, how do we know you're not defrauding now? Oops.
>
> >>
> >> Do you think "Atlas Bugged" knows the information would be
excluded?
> >> I'm thinking yes, since he's allegedly an experience defense
attorney
> >> and all.
> >
> >I can't speak for what Atlas Bugges knows.
>
>
> >> And again, where's that evidence from PACER? Why is "Atlas Bugged"
> >> withholding that information?
> >
> >Beats me. He probably has good reason for doing so. Maybe he's not as
'mean'
> >as you wish to portray him.
>
>
> >Same goes for me. I managed to photoshop the sex offender
registration document to the
> >point where I could read Burnore's social security number. I've
looked it up and it does, indeed, belong to
> >him.
>
>
> > How do you think the so-called 'check forger' managed to get that?
> >>
> >> Is it possible the information is privileged, meaning he can't
legally
> >> post it here? If that's the case, how would the check forger have
> >> gotten the information from public records?
> >
> >See receipt.
>
>
> >He purchased copies of records that, at the time, obviously
> >were not sealed.
>
>
> >That's not to say they aren't sealed now as the original
> >probationary period seems to have expired in the year 2000.
>
> >>
> >> Is it possible the true facts of the case don't support the claims
> >> made on the check forger's site?
> >
> >It's possible but where are these 'true facts?'
>
> included narrative. Why do you suppose that is?
>
> >I'd like to read them and compare and decide for myself.
>
matters
> in your little head. To everyone else except your buddy bugged,
you're just a
> net abuser who's gone sour grapes because I canned your ass for abuse.
>
> >>
> >> It might be worthwhile to ask yourself how much your
dislike/hatred/
> >> anger/whatever you feel for Gary is damaging your ability to look
at
> >> this information objectively.
> >
> >I don't hate Gary.
>
>
> >I just think he's a huge hypocrite and I like to rub his
> >nose in the fact.
>
that pile
> of shit you have NO choice but to hate me. Hate away, poodle.
>
> >
> >>
> >> Why don't you ask "Atlas Bugged" why he hasn't posted information
from
> >> PACER?
> >>
> >
> >Because he probably wouldn't wish to tell me.
>
>
> >Atlas Bugged is a free agent.
> >We don't conspire
>
>
> >and we don't care about each other's business.
>
>
> >Myself, I'm attempting to put some balance in a one-sided Burnore
obfuscation.
>
for net
> abuse.
>
> >Gary's your typical liberal.
>
>
> > He knows if a lie is repeated often enough people will
> > start believing it.
>
keep saying
> sexual assault when a sexual assault never occurred.
>
> >I think that's where you're at.
> >
> >I'm a good judge of character
>
>
hahaha
>
> >and I can tell you with all sincerity that
> >there is something about Gary that doesn't pass the smell test.
>
>
> >I don't whiff that unfortunate odor coming from Atlas Bugged's
direction.
>
together.
>
> > And, for what it's worth,
>
> including your claim that I was charged with and/or convicted of
sexual
> assault.
>
> >yours either. I just think you're being loyal to the wrong
> >individual.
>
doing
> this because I outed your sorry little ass for abuse. Nothing more.
Nothing
> less.
>
> Now jump, poodle. SNIP everything I've just said or ignore it. You
know you
> must.
> --
> Garrry the kiddy's Pal
Oil that chain Garrry or your backpeddler will swarm !!
--
John C.
p.s. I really enjoy your Ko0kdancing, Garrry !!!!
John "C"
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
--
Your Pal,
Honest John C.
p.s. MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!! MORE FOAM, BITCH !!!!
John "C"
"Joeseph P. Blow" <jpb...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:gm29jf$r9t$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> someone who forged checks are `actual photocopies'.
>
> >And why not be consistent and refuse to believe Gary's lies?
>
> >
> >Blaming everything on an alleged check forger doesn't cut it as far
as I'm
> >concerned.
>
> service of the accused for net abuse.
>
> > Here's proof that the court records shown were purchased:
>
>http://web.archive.org/web/20061010174028/archives.mfn.org/images/batch
_1/Receipt.GIF
>
> Probably because they were false.
> --
> Just your average Joe
Art Deco needs a "Blow-Job" so run along to his house in Lakewood,
Colorado.
--
HJ
marcia
wrote:
> "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote in message
>
> news:2hv6i6....@news.alt.net...
<liberal snippage>
> >>> > Let me ask you this: "Atlas Bugged" has a PACER ID.
>
> I do? What claim?
>
> >>> >Why hasn't *he*
>
> >>> > provided access to details supporting his claim?
>
> What claim? I have an obligation to "provide access" to Usenet ghosts,
> pedos, drunks, libelers, or even anyone I don't have a relationship with?
>
> How's that work?
>
> >>> >Why has he relied on
> >>> > information from a forger's site, rather than real legal data?
>
> cite/yawn
The PACER ID that would allow you, an experienced attorney, to
research the accusations you've made against Gary so you don't
negligently republish false information and make libelous statements?
The PACER ID that you, as an experienced criminal defense attorney
(your claim), would normally have for research purposes?
The PACER ID that you might not want to admit having, out of concern
for being accused of acting with actual malice?
That one.
<snip>
>
> >> Do you think "Atlas Bugged" knows the information would be excluded?
> >> I'm thinking yes, since he's allegedly an experience defense attorney
> >> and all.
>
> Experienced and cutting edge:http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/31/washington/31scotus.html?_r=1
> Exclusion is *so* yesterday.
Since the exclusionary rule appears to refer to evidence collected or
analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights being
(sometimes) inadmissible for a criminal prosecution, I'm not sure what
connection you're trying to make here. Perhaps you'd care to
elaborate?
Didn't think so.
I'm talking about the likelihood of information published on an
unofficial website (especially one as inflammatory as the link Greg
provided) being accepted as factual. If you were defending someone,
and the prosecutor tried to introduce the "documents" on that website
as evidence of your client's wrongdoing, you wouldn't object, eh? You
think the judge would allow it?
You're playing games, and *I'm* getting bored.
>
> I'm not "withholding" anything, she's just saying I didn't do the research
> *for* her lazy fat ass.
No, I'm saying you have an obligation to verify the data before trying
to pass it off as fact. You made the accusation; the burden is on
*you.*
>
> >Maybe he's not as 'mean' as you wish to portray him.
>
> Nope. I'm mean. But only to those who reject reason as a means of
> exchange.
Wrong. You're not interested in "reasoning" with people; you want to
manipulate their beliefs by any means necessary.
>
> In AUK, my desire is to be the worst nightmare of those who cross the line
> where civil and moral law intersect. Yes, they do intersect sometimes.
<irony meter explodes>
>
> >Same goes for me. I managed to photoshop the sex offender registration
> >document to the point where I could read Burnore's social security number.
> >I've looked it up and it does, indeed, belong to him. How do you think the
> >so-called 'check forger' managed to get that?
>
> No fair, you're using logic and reason. Bully!
How is that using logic and reason? Since I don't know Gary's SSN, and
can't read it on the document, I'd have to take Greg's word for it,
and Greg's already shown himself to be less than truthful on a number
of occasions (I'm being civil and polite here).
Even if the SSN *does* match, it doesn't prove any of the other claims
are true (for example, the forger labels the table of contents, "The
Burnore Statutory Rape Documents," a claim not substantiated by
California Penal Code 647.6, which doesn't even address rape, nor by
the text of the alleged police report).
But again, you're playing games, and I'm getting bored.
See ya.
John "C"
"Pinku-Sensei" <pinku-...@caballista.org> wrote in message
>
> I'll use my FNVW privilege to bugger him!
> --
> Pinky-Sue Lamb
> Tranny of AUK
> Acting Ghay in AFA-B
Faggot !!
--
Your Pal,
HJ
atlas bugged
news:2i1i2o....@news.alt.net...
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:03:22 -0500, "atlas bugged"
> <atlasbug...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>"Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message
>>> In article <2huv1c....@news.alt.net>,
>>> atlasbug...@gmail.com says...
>>>> "Kali" <ka...@happy.joy> wrote in message
>>>> > In article <2httn5....@news.alt.net>,
>>>> > atlasbug...@gmail.com says...
>>>> > comments about women and minorities is hardly "vile".
>>>> >
>>>> > You are vile. Simply look in the mirror.
>>>> >
>>>> > "Cuntarcia"
>>>> > "Woof! Want to do it with me, Marcia-style?"
>>>> > "We speak English here, you drunk 'injun"
>>>> >
>>>> > In article <2hi2ks....@news.alt.net>,
>>>> > atlasbug...@gmail.com says...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Did I mention I mistook you for a human woman?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Woof! Want to do it with me, Marcia-style?
>>>> >
>>>> > In article <2hi184....@news.alt.net>,
>>>> > atlasbug...@gmail.com says...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> We speak English here, you drunk 'injun
>>>> >
>>>> > In article <2hhv32....@news.alt.net>,
>>>> > atlasbug...@gmail.com says...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Even then, the typical sociopath will apologize because it serves
>>>> >> his
>>>> >> purpose in manipulating others.
>>>> >
>>>> > In article <2hr7u8....@news.alt.net>,
>>>> > atlasbug...@gmail.com says...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> >>And apologies to yer dad, I accidentally posted his addy in
>>>> >> >>Mahwah,
>>>> >> >>thinking
>>>> >> >>it was yours. Naturally, I presumed Dad=With Mom+basement=Kevin
>>>> >> >>Cannon.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > Is that the way a big time lawyer like you works?
>>>> >> > Getting the facts *wrong*?
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I make mistakes. I apologize. I try to make it right.
>>>> >
>>>> > You might be maninpulating someone if you weren't so transparent.
>>>>
>>>> Well, all you've done is posted some of my most entertaining flames.
>>>>
>>>> Good to see you read my every word, however.
>>>>
>>>> If you aren't owned, I am unaware of what the term means.
>>>>
>>>> And there's no symmetry. I've read none but a fraction of your vomit.
>>>>
>>>> When your lips are done moving as you read this post, you have my
>>>> permission
>>>> to reply. Good girl!
>>>
>>> I just read your desperate attempt to flame with Bill O'Reilly's
>>> voice. Hjilarious.
>>
>>"Hilarious" is the operative term, and it means it wasn't an "attempt," it
>>was a success.
>
> Quit pickin on the girls you fucking creep.
>
> ...heh
What? You mistook them for wimmen?
Wotta pisser! I mistook you for a male!
Making mistakes is just human.
Shit. I mistook you for that, too!
Some Guy
[snip]
> Because he probably wouldn't wish to tell me. Atlas Bugged is a free agent.
> We don't conspire and we don't care about each other's business.
[snip]
How odd, then, that Atlas posted this:
Message ID: 2husl1....@news.alt.net
"Notice the claim that *we're* crossing legal lines. But no one seems
to want to "work through sanctioned legal channels" to fix the horrors
we've inflicted."
--
"Nope wrong again there are several trolls / kooks on this group and I
am NOT one of them."
(Jamie)
"I love obvious lies posted about me. They rock. Nothing speaks louder
about the crappy jerk who posted it, and speaks better for me."
(Atlas Bugged)
"thrown under the bus is not the same as riding the bus you moran"
(Jeep America #1)
"most responsable people post the response on top but im not surprised a
bottom feeder as you bottom responds. and you act like im the newbie"
(Jeep America #1)
marcia
wrote:
> Gregory Hall wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > Because he probably wouldn't wish to tell me. Atlas Bugged is a free agent.
> > We don't conspire and we don't care about each other's business.
>
> [snip]
>
> How odd, then, that Atlas posted this:
>
>
> "Notice the claim that *we're* crossing legal lines. But no one seems
> to want to "work through sanctioned legal channels" to fix the horrors
> we've inflicted."
Also notice the rapid dissemination of technical info. Within the last
24-48 hours, at least one member of a certain non-affiliated un-group
learned to use an anonymous remailer, while another member learned to
decode messages. But there's no conspiracy going on; they don't care
about each other's business, or anything. <chortle>
John "C"
"Some Gay Guy" <I'm_Art_Deco@My_Place.Jizz> wrote in message
>
> "Notice the claim that *we're* cross-dressing
> across State Lines. But no one seems
> channels" to fix the horrors we've inflicted."
> --
No one wants to work with Faggots like you Deco !!
--
Your Pal,
HJ
John "C"
"Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
> > Bob Officer <bobof...@127.0.0.7> wrote in
> > news:1358o4pvm1129agrn...@4ax.com:
> >
> >> Path: blackhelicopter.databasix.com!not-for-mail
> >> From: Gary L. Burnore <gbur...@databasix.com>
> >> Newsgroups:
> >>
alt.usenet.kooks,alt.fan.art-bell,alt.free.newsservers,alt.fucknozzles
> >> Subject: Re: NOMINATION: CNotM (was Re: es)
> >> Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:55:19 -0500
> >> Organization: Our news service can beat up your news service
> >> Lines: 150
> >> Message-ID: <glqk7n$6ua$3...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
> >> References: <glqbg7$cvg$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
> >> <2hn1gr....@news.alt.net>
> >> <glqda7$hh2$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
> >> <2hn3or....@news.alt.net>
> >> <glqg2e$pkt$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
> >> <2hn623....@news.alt.net>
> >> <e10ba5e5-6c7f-4b31...@b38g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
> >> <c300d4e2-f017-4448...@s9g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
> >> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> >> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
> >> X-Trace: blackhelicopter.databasix.com 1233179703 7114
> >> blackhelicopter.databasix.com (28 Jan 2009 21:55:03 GMT)
> >> X-Complaints-To: ab...@databasix.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 Jan
> >> 2009 21:55:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 5.00/32.1170
> >> X-No-Archive: Y
> >> Xref: blackhelicopter.databasix.com alt.usenet.kooks:600765
> >> alt.fan.art-bell:153488 alt.free.newsservers:34466
> >> alt.fucknozzles:37981
> >>
> >> On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:15:34 -0800 (PST), marcia
> >> <marcia...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>X-No-Archive: Yes
> >>>On Jan 28, 4:12 pm, marcia <marcia12...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> X-No-Archive: Yes
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jan 28, 1:51 pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
> >>>> > "K. A. Cannon" <kcan...@insurgent.orgy> wrote in
> >>>> > messagenews:glqg2e$pkt$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> >>>>
> >>>> > > "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> posted
> >>>> > > <2hn3or.sfq.1...@news.alt.net> in alt.fan.art-bell on Wed, 28
> >>>> > > Jan 2009 15:12:42 -0500:
> >>>>
> >>>> > You seem to lack clarity of thinking, dude! What you meant to
say
> >>>> > is <atlasbuggedbys...@insurgent.org> can be used IN ITS
ENTIRETY.
> >>>> > But that isn't what you actually wrote. You said it could be
used
> >>>> > and that means it can be used in whole or in part because you
> >>>> > failed to specify in whole. You gave us permission to use it.
> >>>> > Without your specifying in its entirety it then becomes up to
us
> >>>> > how and how much of it to use.
> >>>>
> >>>> > Dolt!
> >>>>
> >>>> > --
> >>>> > Gregory Hall
> >>>>
> >>>> Wow, what a dumbass.
> >>>>
> >>>> I nominate Gregory Hall for the Clueless Newbie of the Month
award
> >>>> based on the above.
> >>>>
> >>>> Seconds?
> >>>
> >>>No, a frogger made that nomination, which means the nomination
doesn't
> >>>count, IIRC. It was a good suggestion, though.
> >>
> >> Darn. So are you nominating?
> >
> > I'll treat your second in MID:
> > <glqk6l$6ua$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
> > as a nomination and use my FNVW privilege to second that.
>
> Pinky Sue Transgendered Queer admits rigging the vote. Typical of
liberals!
> --
> Gregory Hall
LOL !! That's Miss Pinky Sue Lamb !!!!!!
--
Your Pal,
HJ
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:26:59 -0500, "atlas bugged"
> <atlasbug...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Gary L. Burnore" <gbur...@databasix.com> wrote in message
>> news:gm2c0k$5q7$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>>> I do. There was no sexual assault and there was no sexual assault
>>> or assault
>>> on a minor. You CLAIM to be a lawyer. I believe you're LYING.
>>
>> Well, is Rhonduh real? Or just a screedname? She posts through your
>> service and has conceded that you got in trouble with LE.
>
> You forgot to say crickets, dumbass. That someone else can't concede
> for me is known by anyone who's not a kook. That's why you're not
> included.
I never "conceded" anything. I've repeatedly said that Charles Novins is
libeling you when he calls you a child molester and a pedophile, which
you are not.
Much like Greg, Charles Novins has a knack for twisting words to mean
things they do not. I would be interested to see the specific writing he
is using for the basis of my "concession."
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
"You know you can indict a ham sandwich if you want to."
William J. Martini, Judge, United States District Court
Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries
> On Jan 31, 1:58 pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
>> "marcia" <marcia1234...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:28af1366-f0b8-4013...@g3g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
Corrected:http://web.archive.org/web/20061010174028/archives.mfn.org/images/bat...
>>
>> Don't be afraid to view the truth.
>
> The truth of what I see is a $7.00 receipt for *something* from Santa
> Clara County Courthouse.
No. That's not what you see. You see a receipt from the Santa Clara
County *Municipal* Court.
Felonies are not tried in municipal court. Misdemeanors are tried in
municipal court.
marcia
wrote:
> marcia wrote:
> > On Jan 31, 1:58 pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
> >> "marcia" <marcia1234...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>news:28af1366-f0b8-4013...@g3g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
>
> <snipped>
>
> Corrected:http://web.archive.org/web/20061010174028/archives.mfn.org/images/bat...
>
>
>
> >> Don't be afraid to view the truth.
>
> > The truth of what I see is a $7.00 receipt for *something* from Santa
> > Clara County Courthouse.
>
> No. That's not what you see. You see a receipt from the Santa Clara
> County *Municipal* Court.
>
> Felonies are not tried in municipal court. Misdemeanors are tried in
> municipal court.
Thank you. I have *no* short-term memory, which is what I was working
from.
Some Guy
Eh, that doesn't mean too much. Of more importance is Greg's sudden
backpedalling about how he and Atlas aren't really in cahoots. There's
a reason for that, you know.
--
"Yes, the people she is referring to need to be invaded and have their
leaders killed. And if the quickest way to reforming them muslim culture
into a Civilised society is to convert all muslims to christianity, do it."
(Marshall)
"Why do you bother responding to my posts if you think they're crap?
There is plenty of crap on newsgroups, yet I get the privilege of you
responding to me?"
(Carole)
"As I've said Bob and I don't know if you're capable of comprehending,
its not the amount of silica in the water but the way its prepared.
There is a certain technique in making homeopathic remedies where the
mixture is shaken which somehow turns it into a vibrational medicine."
(Carole)
"Let's face it Bob, you just don't understand anything except what
you've learned in the schools that have deliberately had their science
dumbed-down for reasons of national security. There are certain concepts
that just aren't talked about and researched into."
(Carole)
John "C"
"Some Gay Guy" <I'M_Art_Deco@My_Place.Jizz> wrote in message
>
> Eh, that doesn't mean too much. Of more importance is Greg's sudden
> backpedalling about how he and Atlas aren't really in cahoots.
There's
> a reason for that, you know.
> --
And you lack the "critical & logical" thinking skills to determine that,
Pedo Deco !!
Dr. Tholen is correct when he refers to you as a "Buffoon" !!
--
Your Pal For Life,
HJ
marcia
wrote:
> marcia wrote:
> > On Feb 1, 9:52 pm, Some Guy <noemailformetha...@anyplace.invalid>
> > wrote:
> >> Gregory Hall wrote:
>
> >> [snip]
>
> >>> Because he probably wouldn't wish to tell me. Atlas Bugged is a free agent.
> >>> We don't conspire and we don't care about each other's business.
> >> [snip]
>
> >> How odd, then, that Atlas posted this:
>
> >> Message ID: 2husl1.rcc.1...@news.alt.net
>
> >> "Notice the claim that *we're* crossing legal lines. But no one seems
> >> to want to "work through sanctioned legal channels" to fix the horrors
> >> we've inflicted."
>
> > Also notice the rapid dissemination of technical info. Within the last
> > 24-48 hours, at least one member of a certain non-affiliated un-group
> > learned to use an anonymous remailer, while another member learned to
> > decode messages. But there's no conspiracy going on; they don't care
> > about each other's business, or anything. <chortle>
>
> Eh, that doesn't mean too much. Of more importance is Greg's sudden
> backpedalling about how he and Atlas aren't really in cahoots. There's
> a reason for that, you know.
He doesn't want to be involved in a counter-suit?
Some Guy
Greg is a wussy. You can count on a wussy being a wussy when the heat
comes down.
--
"How about you? Prove *anything.* *Ever.*"
(Atlas Bugged)
"I've gotten the impression that this jerkoff's true identity might be
available. I think I smell blood in the water. Yummmm.!"
(Atlas Bugged)
"All unbalanced people are SATANISTS! Look at the world such SMART
PEOPLE have created for themselves. Tell me it is not HELL ON EARTH!!"
(Raymond Karczewski)
"You appear to be a raving idiot. I am a poster that is only here to
watch you squirm, lie, spit, and hide desperately."
(Atlas Bugged)
ah
Why are you posting this in demon.local?
--
ah
ah
> "Gregory Hall" <greg...@home.fake> wrote in message
>>> On Jan 31, 12:28 pm, "Gregory Hall" <gregh...@home.fake> wrote:
>>>> "marcia" <marcia1234...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>> news:ef19c167-bdf7-48db...@r41g2000prr.googlegroups.com...
>>>> <snippage of a hefty nature>
>>>>
>>>> > Yet they look up to you like a hero. lol. There are none so blind as
>>>> > those who will not see.
>>>>
>>>> Then open your eyes! Stop supporting registered sex offenders. Start
>>>> supporting their victims.
>>>
>>> I do not, and will not, support unsubstantiated claims. I do not, and
>>> will not, accept "documents" (note the scare quotes) posted on a check
>>> forger's site as credible evidence of anything. I'm not making any
>>> judgments unless and until I know the full story and circumstances
>>> surrounding the alleged event, which is unlikely to happen.
>>>
>>> I'm applying the same standards a jury would apply, which is only
>>> fair. What you and "Atlas Bugged" are doing is neither fair nor
>>> reasonable nor just, and likely at least some of your persecution
>>> constitutes libel and harassment. I refuse to be a party to that.
>>>
>>> As far as "supporting registered sex offenders" goes, I do not. I
>>> helped a prosecutor in another state obtain a longer sentence for one
>>> particular sex offender (he did not offend against anyone in my
>>> family), and have personally kept tabs on him for years. Unlike you,
>>> I've worked through sanctioned legal channels and haven't persecuted
>>> or harassed the person.
>
> want to "work through sanctioned legal channels" to fix the horrors we've
> inflicted.
>
> through sanctioned legal channels!!!
>>
>>
>
>
>>If you refuse to believe actual photocopies of official documents then just
>>what WILL you believe? And why not be consistent and refuse to believe
>>Gary's lies?
>
> seem to only say the docs are "unverified" or false, but no one seems to
> deny Burnore did something that the criminal justice system regarded as
> intolerable, and that a record of this was made.
>
> They seem to just say, "hey, it wasn't like he did a biggie, it's more like
> he smoked a joint, it ain't worth mentioning." And they seem to say we're
> turning that into a conviction for selling cocaine, continuing with the
> metaphor.
>
> In fact, they've confirmed the underlying event. They have just said "no
> biggie."
>
> Yeah, no biggie. LOL. The daughter of his ex-girlfriend is probably
> *still* trying to Listerine the taste of Gary's tongue from her mouth.
>
> God knows what Mom's outcome was, both mentally and bacteriologically. Or
> virologically. Yeeeeccchhh!!!
>
> Now, Burnore infects the 'net with toxins. I have to admit I like him
> better now, but the number of victims has risen exponentially.
>>
>> concerned. Here's proof that the court records shown were purchased:
>
> Wow. I'll add it to my little "Gary Sig" Hundreds of Usenetizens have
> visited them now, according to my link stats.
You'll not be warned.
>
> If Databasux is a business, and not a hobby as it appears, he'd have a clear
> cause of action in court if anything I said was knowingly false.
>
> "Sanctioned legal channels," you know...
>
> <crickets>
*crickets*
--
a "Hi, Alexa!" h
ah
*plonk*
--
ah
John "C"
"ah" <splif...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4988ec27$0$57670$892e...@auth.newsreader.octanews.com...
Why are you still breathing, you ancient fossil ??
--
HJ
John "C"
"Some Gay Guy" <I'M_Art_Deco@My_Place.Jizz> wrote in message
>
> comes down.
> --
Deco is a Pussy. You can count on a Pussy being a Pussy when the
man-meat comes out.
Art Deco = >:-0 <==8
<sound effects of "Deco-Slurping">
--
Your Pal,
HJ