"Flash®" <
ScarletS...@fastest.man.alive.org> wrote in message news:hg5fsu$vk1$1...@aioe.org...
>
>
> Given the current status of AUK in respect of 'membership', and the
> quality of posts made, I am reasonably sure this post is a complete
> waste of fucking time.. so here is small effort at pissing into a light breeze.
>
> I place a formal objection to the bid by;
> Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler <
fn...@databasix.com>
> aka [K. A. Cannon <kca...@insurgent.orgy>]
>
> in;
> Message-ID: <hfura0$afo$
1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
>
> of;
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:23:12 +0000 (UTC)
>
> to usurp the position of FNVW.
> __________________________________________________
>
> My objection relies on the grounds Cannon is in violation of the
> AUK charter.
> The charter cited at
ftp://ftp.isc.org/pub/usenet/control/alt reads:
> As per discussion on alt.config alt.usenet.kooks
> has been created. Usenet has more of its share of
> conspiracy theorists and kooks and this group has
> been created for the discussion of these people.
> Examples of their work will be posted here and it will
> be a meeting place for kook-hunters to gather and
> swap stories and keep one another up to date as to
> where the new budding kooks can be found. It is
> hoped that through the careful use of the Followup
> line, kooks can be lured into crossposting to alt.usenet.kooks.
>
> Specifically:
> 1. Cannon is not a "kook-hunter".
> Lamer/Troll/Wannabe.. yes.
> 2. Cannon fails to keep "up to date", and, further, refuses to
> update others when requested.
> Message-ID: <hg2iif$mtp$
1...@aioe.org>
> 3. Cannon is technically incompetent. The complexity of fup
> is beyond him.
> 4. Cannon refuses to vacate the target froup
> once the "k00k" has been extracted to <auk>.
> That action alone is condemnation enough of the
> boi's character.
>
> At his best Cannon is a Troll, and not very effective at that either.
> At the lower end of intelligence scales, Cannon fits the bill for "bully"
> and thus cannot be trusted with the AUK Office of FNVW.
>
> __________________________________________________
>
> To bring the issues Cannon has right now with himself, I quote:
> You don't take the position of FNVW...it is and has always
> been a benevolent dictatorship handed down lovingly from
> one kookologist to another. If you had any klue, and it is oh
> so fucking painfully obvious you do not, you would know this.
> To think you could just take such a high office is sacrilege.
>
> My 'sin' was to float an idea in making a nomination.
> Message-ID: <hfg791$tmp$
1...@aioe.org>.
> Cannon simply cannot read. Period.
> In contrast, Cannon has done farkall to move <auk> back on track.
> Cannon did not bother to discover who I am, immediately jumping to a
> wrong conclusion in responding the only way he knows.. a lame troll.
> Having lost that attempt, proving what a buffoon the guy is, IT
> runs up an "announcement".
> The current FNVW has given no indication either in <auk> or by PM
> for any change of Office. Further, I seriously doubt Bob would support
> Cannon as an office bearer of <auk>.
>
>
> Cannon himself is displaying kooky behavior.
> Just take a second grab at Cannon's idea of what constitutes a
> nomination for kookery.
> I would like to nominate the following:
> E-mUtt - Tony Sidaway "Drama Queen" Award
> Mad as a box of frogs - Kluck Lysaght "Tar & Feathers" Award
> Lady Veteran - Black Knight Award - Hasn't been
> given out in a while and she certainly seems to deserve it.
> Greg Hall - Kook of the Year
> My two bits on that 'lits'.
> Emutt -- a sad criminal who should have no air time anywhere.
> KFd
> Not a k00k.
>
> MAABOF -- an "old guy" laughing himself into a coffin. KFd
> for supporting lamers as "Lamey" in <ash>. a froup
> that should be off limits to aukkers.
> Not a k00k.
>
> Lady Veteran -- an ideological activist, LV is guilty only of
> "sticking it right back at 'em" and *proving* a greater
> level of skill in doing so. KFd for supporting lamers as "Lamey".
> Not a K00k.
>
> Greg Hall -- gweggie is plastered with k00k awards, and revels in it.
> Read his words
> "I'm immune to their impotent smear tactics to their chagrin."
> AND
> "The twit is a Brit"-- prompted by gweggie's technical
> incompetence in readiing this line:
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 01:23:12 +0000 (UTC)
> gweggie is a relatively simple person hiding himself in grandiose
> gesture. What he craves is attention and thus is one of the few
> recent <auk> successes.
> Brought to <auk> by yours truly I would add.
> Success being measured by the fact he loves it here, failing to
> unsubscribe for more than a few days before permanently installing
> himself.
> Now, *that is k00ky* buuuut just what depth of insight is required to
> see it (behavior) in such a blatantly simple person as gweggie is?
> Certainly Cannon had to be TOLD by gweggie to get Cannon to
> nominate him.
> Message-ID: <
3c0gpi....@news.alt.net>
>
> As if none of those nominations are not k00ky enough to make a decision
> as to Cannons complex, there is the thought that ALL of these nominees
> are already posting to <auk>, so how does that work as a lits??
>
>
> The icing on the cake?
> Having nominated the only candidates _himself_ Cannon
> makes the usual request
> *Awards*
> As of right now the month of December will be a catch all for
> any and all awards that should have been given since the
> last official awards month. So...if you have a K00k and you
> believe your K00k is a contender put that nomination here
> in this thread.
> There is just a plainly stupid suggestion. Today being the 14th/DEC2009
> there is no respectable courting period to solicit k00ks to <auk> to have
> them correctly vetted.
> Rightly there is only "k00k of the Year" to decide.
> And there was the purpose of my offer, since withdrawn.
> There are two k00ks ripe for the nomination who could easily be
> encouraged to post here again, giving gweggie a run for the Crown
> he considers his by default.
>
> Cannon does not a FNVW make. As he refuses to communicate just
> what if any communication with Bob Larter has transpired AND in
> the absence of PJR, I do place all of the above for froup consideration
> in rejecting this dweebs claim/s outright.
> It is that or vote on peeps already posting to <auk>, hardly a choice.. IMO.
>
> I respectfully submit my objection.
> --
> Flash®
> "Vote early and vote often" is not in the charter.
Even if his "Daddy" helps him out by getting his accountant to count the 10 votes on a typical ballot here in the "Smoking Crater" of 'AUK' ??
--
John C.