I argued for energy from Sun, collected in solar orbit. But that's way
off, Earth-energy should be able to give us much of what we need much
sooner. right?
giveitawhirl2008 wrote:
You mean like in Iceland ?
Works a treat if you have hot springs or the like.
Graham
Works well if you have the right sort of geography and the right sort
of rock formations to trap the heat.
Also needs to be relatively near the surface to reduce the drilling
costs.
But yes, if you have the right conditions, its a real winner.
Just google geothermal hot rocks, and you will learn a lot about it.
The greenies are opposed.
> http://news.opb.org/article/3159-geothermal-project-central-oregon-faces-backlash/
--
For email, replace firstnamelastinitial
with my first name and last initial.
It's used on a small scale in souther Oregon. It's common for
homes to be heated with geothermal. To do it, you drill a 250
ft well, drop two pipes into the well that are joined at the
ends, so that you have a big "U". Then pump water through that.
A heat exchanger gives you hot air for space heating. And a heat
exchanger gives you DHW.
The greenies seem to oppose anything that isnt wind or solar.
Wont even allow Natural Gas Power stations where I live .
Larry Caldwell wrote:
> (Mauried) says...
>
> > But yes, if you have the right conditions, its a real winner.
> > Just google geothermal hot rocks, and you will learn a lot about it.
>
> The greenies are opposed.
>
> > http://news.opb.org/article/3159-geothermal-project-central-oregon-faces-backlash/
The greenies are opposed to anything that might actually work economically. All they want is to make people miserable with high taxes.
Graham
Better scratch wind off that list. Many wind turbines have been held
up due to noise concerns. There have also been complaints that they
don't look nice.