I tried to install some sort of water bottle device years ago, and one had to punch so many holes and make so many connections I was afraid that if I fixed my car, I would very likely break it. Not cost effective.
If I tried something new, a mechanic would have to do it for me.
> I tried to install some sort of water bottle device years ago, and one > had to punch so many holes and make so many connections I was afraid that > if I fixed my car, I would very likely break it. Not cost effective.
> If I tried something new, a mechanic would have to do it for me.
Thanks.
I saw a post on a blog which said the guy bought the plans and they were very poor and difficult to understand so he felt that he had been scammed.
If it was so easy to get that result, wouldn't the manufacturers already be doing it?
Back in the middle of the century (yes I'm that old) cars would show an improvement in performance in the rain or on high humidity days. That was back when squeezing the last bit of energy out of fuel was not a priority. That effect no longer occurs as engines are engineered for optimum use already.
Back in the middle of the century (yes I'm that old) cars would show an improvement in performance in the rain or on high humidity days. That was back when squeezing the last bit of energy out of fuel was not a priority. That effect no longer occurs as engines are engineered for optimum use already.
> Back in the middle of the century (yes I'm that old) cars would show > an improvement in performance in the rain or on high humidity days. > That was back when squeezing the last bit of energy out of fuel was > not a priority. That effect no longer occurs as engines are > engineered for optimum use already.
> Harry K
So why isn't he famous and a millionaire. He has obviously invented the world's first perpetual motion machine.
Again: If it worked, it would be in production autos. The engineers bust thier butts trying to get a minor improvement in efficiency and if all it took was one of those kook machines they would be on it like stink on s***.
> Back in the middle of the century (yes I'm that old) cars would show > an improvement in performance in the rain or on high humidity days. > That was back when squeezing the last bit of energy out of fuel was > not a priority. That effect no longer occurs as engines are > engineered for optimum use already.
> Harry K
So why isn't he famous and a millionaire. He has obviously invented the world's first perpetual motion machine.
Uh, cause he was murdered by Big Oil!
Again: If it worked, it would be in production autos. The engineers bust thier butts trying to get a minor improvement in efficiency and if all it took was one of those kook machines they would be on it like stink on s***.
> > Back in the middle of the century (yes I'm that old) cars would show > > an improvement in performance in the rain or on high humidity days. > > That was back when squeezing the last bit of energy out of fuel was > > not a priority. That effect no longer occurs as engines are > > engineered for optimum use already.
> > Harry K
> So why isn't he famous and a millionaire. He has obviously invented > the world's first perpetual motion machine.
> Uh, cause he was murdered by Big Oil!
> Again: If it worked, it would be in production autos. The engineers > bust thier butts trying to get a minor improvement in efficiency and > if all it took was one of those kook machines they would be on it like > stink on s***.
> Harry K- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
Nothing denser than a true believer wanting a scam to be true.
> > Back in the middle of the century (yes I'm that old) cars would show > > an improvement in performance in the rain or on high humidity days. > > That was back when squeezing the last bit of energy out of fuel was > > not a priority. That effect no longer occurs as engines are > > engineered for optimum use already.
> > Harry K
> So why isn't he famous and a millionaire. He has obviously invented > the world's first perpetual motion machine.
> Uh, cause he was murdered by Big Oil!
> Again: If it worked, it would be in production autos. The engineers > bust thier butts trying to get a minor improvement in efficiency and > if all it took was one of those kook machines they would be on it like > stink on s***.
> Harry K- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
Nothing denser than a true believer wanting a scam to be true.
> > > Back in the middle of the century (yes I'm that old) cars would show > > > an improvement in performance in the rain or on high humidity days. > > > That was back when squeezing the last bit of energy out of fuel was > > > not a priority. That effect no longer occurs as engines are > > > engineered for optimum use already.
> > > Harry K
> > So why isn't he famous and a millionaire. He has obviously invented > > the world's first perpetual motion machine.
> > Uh, cause he was murdered by Big Oil!
> > Again: If it worked, it would be in production autos. The engineers > > bust thier butts trying to get a minor improvement in efficiency and > > if all it took was one of those kook machines they would be on it like > > stink on s***.
> > Harry K- Hide quoted text -
> > - Show quoted text -
> Nothing denser than a true believer wanting a scam to be true.
> Harry K
> Do you get paid in shillings?- Hide quoted text -
> - Show quoted text -
Is that supposed to mean something in this discussion?
You started out asking if it was a scam. The answer is YES. What is your problem?
