Genuine way to produce electricity from water

[Andre]

http://tinyurl.com/rpvk

:)

Comments ?

-A

[Solomon "You Dirty Mother" Kozanski]

"Andre" <test...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:2c2cf14c.0310...@posting.google.com...

its less than 1% efficient and still requires something to "pump" the
water...
--
Brought to you, courtesy of Kozanski's Morgue & Grill, LLC

[Mr Clarke]

"Solomon "You Dirty Mother" Kozanski" <nos...@gospamyourself.com> wrote in
message news:10si0me...@corp.supernews.com...

The research team don`t seem to deny its present pitfalls.
Don`t you think this process has similarities to the Hall effect?
(without magnets of course)
It would of course work perpetually if the "water" created its
own currents, both electronically and kinetically.
Ah well, that`s progress!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashley Clarke
-------------------------------------------------------

[Solomon "You Dirty Mother" Kozanski]

"Mr Clarke" <ash...@UNBOGUSa-clarke.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:cqfkjk$fk2$1$8300...@news.demon.co.uk...

> "Solomon "You Dirty Mother" Kozanski" <nos...@gospamyourself.com> wrote in
> message news:10si0me...@corp.supernews.com...
> > "Andre" <test...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:2c2cf14c.0310...@posting.google.com...
> > > http://tinyurl.com/rpvk
> > >
> > > :)
> > >
> > > Comments ?
> > >
> > > -A
> >
> > its less than 1% efficient and still requires something to "pump" the
> > water...
> > --
> > Brought to you, courtesy of Kozanski's Morgue & Grill, LLC
> >
>
> The research team don`t seem to deny its present pitfalls.
> Don`t you think this process has similarities to the Hall effect?
> (without magnets of course)

the hall effect without a magnetic
field.......................................................................
...........................?

> It would of course work perpetually if the "water" created its
> own currents, both electronically and kinetically.
> Ah well, that`s progress!

uh, no, viscosity tends to be a bitch when it comes to fluid based perpetual
motion devices.

[Mr Clarke]

You`re just a waste of time talking to.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ashley Clarke
-------------------------------------------------------

"Solomon "You Dirty Mother" Kozanski" <nos...@gospamyourself.com> wrote in

message news:10snj4s...@corp.supernews.com...

[Solomon "You Dirty Mother" Kozanski]

then why dont you go talk to somebody else..... like all the trained ivy
league physicists who populate this ng?

[FM - No static at all]

Solomon "You Dirty Mother" Kozanski wrote:

>>>
>> The research team don`t seem to deny its present pitfalls.
>> Don`t you think this process has similarities to the Hall effect?
>> (without magnets of course)
>
> the hall effect without a magnetic
> field.......................................................................
> ...........................?

The presence of an electric current would indicate that a magnetic field
is present, yet ignored.

>
>> It would of course work perpetually if the "water" created its
>> own currents, both electronically and kinetically.

Angular momentum anyone?

> uh, no, viscosity tends to be a bitch when it comes to fluid based perpetual
> motion devices.

Bitch or not, the viscosity of water should not be inhibitive to this
process, it would seem conductivity of electric energy is primary and
the ability to drive any gain in energy through a "pipe" to be stored
and reused. Dual tank circuits that switch their charges back and forth
between the caps, and there always seems to more left over than when I
started t he experiment! Hmmm.... Newton may have missed something here.

Fred Marsico
Quantum Mechanics R & D
Corvallis, Oregon

Change the energy paradigm one electron at a time