harry k & Desertphile talk a load of shit
Mr A Clarke
Desertphile
<aclar...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
> Anyone else?
Ah, the "shit" you read is what every physicist on the planet
says, as well as what every test ever performed reveals. If you
ever see a magical system performing a miracle, do let us know,
okay?
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
spike
a professional skepticist. You do not speak the truth, and that is all i
am interested in.
here some right stuff to get started in Radiant energy (don't call it
free energy, you have to do work to excite the vacuum to give you the
additional radiant, safe and cold(!) Energy in usable form.)
low energy rates (easy to do for yourself at home):
John Bedini
(monopole motor, recharge 4 Batteries from 1, also a very interesting
"schoolgirl motor" that drove the science teachers crazy because it was
way too efficient and could not be explained by our textbook theory)
futher studys:
Nikola Tesla
(inventor ac grid, scalar waves, several hundred patents in existence,
see "wardenclyffe tower" wireless transmitting to power the whole earth
without losses)
Viktor Schauberger
(invented the Implosionmotor, antigravity machines after the concept of
fish swimming against the stream of the river)
Wilhelm Reich
(the us court ordered the burning of all his books in 1957, because the
proper use of Orgone energy would set humans free, he could let it rain
in the desert using an inverted "cloud buster", this is documented science)
edwin v gray,
80-500 hp HVDC Pulsed Radiant energy motor (invented first
motor+circuit that does not need any fuel besides a running battery,
which in turn regenerated radiant energy to charge the second battery.
then you switch the batteries. no power chord ever again. this system is
almost identical with the magnifying transmitter design from Nikola Tesla)
Tom E Bearden
(who invented the MEG, Motionless Electric Generator, put 1 watt in get
5 watt out)
if you are serious, look at these websites:
http://rexresearch.com/
http://www.icehouse.net/john1/index11.html
http://educate-yourself.org/
Desertphile is correct in one sense: our physicists just know what they
learn in the universitys. that does not mean that they know how nature
works. they know how our standard rules apply to general cases. but the
effect we are looking at is a very SPECIFIC effect that, it seems, is
not discovered by mainstream physics. highly intelligent people are
working on these projects and i replicated a few gadgeds from those
people, it is true you get much more radiant energy out than you put
conventional electricity in to excite the effect.
another thing with radiant energy, it manifests usually in high voltage
spike, very short in duration(my 12v motor produces a 85 Volt kickback i
can collect or use.) NO CURRENT FLOWS while the radiant energy
manifests. in simple words: you can collect it with batteries or with
condensators but you can not masure it with amps, so most "scientists"
says it won't work because THEY CANT EVEN MEASURE IT WITH THE TOOLS THEY
GET IN A UNIVERITY you have to plant a scope, that is your only hope to
detect it directly.
I showed such a device to a professionally learned electrician. he said
it can not work. i turned it on, and it worked. again, he said it does
not work. so i put 4 batteries to be charged with the radiant energy. we
measured everything. after that, he still said it could not work if his
textbooks are right. i said to him that maybe his textbooks were not
ENTIERLY right, that this effect was not investigated properly before
writing the book.
he got angry and took off. i never saw him again.
Desertphile schrieb:
Desertphile
wrote:
> harry k & Desertphile do not take this the wrong way, but you sound like
> a professional skepticist.
Thank you! I'm not sure you started out with flattery, but the
complement was nice anyhow.
> You do not speak the truth, and that is all i
> am interested in.
If you ever find something I write or say wrong, perhaps you would
be kind enough to point out the mistake so that I will not repeat
it. I thank you in advance.
harry k
wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:42:02 +0100, spike <sp...@darkhippies.ch>
> wrote:
>
> > harry k & Desertphile do not take this the wrong way, but you sound like
> > a professional skepticist.
>
> Thank you! I'm not sure you started out with flattery, but the
> complement was nice anyhow.
>
> > You do not speak the truth, and that is all i
> > am interested in.
>
> If you ever find something I write or say wrong, perhaps you would
> be kind enough to point out the mistake so that I will not repeat
> it. I thank you in advance.
>
> Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
> "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
Hopefully, when he does he will write it in English vice that
language, whatever it is, he uses here.
He reminds me of the queen in Alice in Wonderland - believes a bunch
of impossible stuff before breakfast.
Harry K
mark krawczuk
"Desertphile" <deser...@invalid-address.net> wrote in message
news:149995tuh7f5417mp...@4ax.com...
Mr A Clarke
"mark krawczuk" <kraw...@adam.com.au> wrote in message
news:WqednUdB0Pq7v4zQ...@adnap.net.au...
harry k
> Pure Irritation
>
> "mark krawczuk" <krawc...@adam.com.au> wrote in message
>
> news:WqednUdB0Pq7v4zQ...@adnap.net.au...
>
>
>
> > hey you should be called pedophile not desertphile..................
>
> >news:149995tuh7f5417mp...@4ax.com...
> >> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:04:07 +0100, "Mr A Clarke"
> >> <aclarke2...@toucansurf.com> wrote:
>
> >>> Anyone else?
>
> >> Ah, the "shit" you read is what every physicist on the planet
> >> says, as well as what every test ever performed reveals. If you
> >> ever see a magical system performing a miracle, do let us know,
> >> okay?
>
> >> --
> >>http://desertphile.org
> >> Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
>
> - Show quoted text -
So when are you going to step up to the plate and show us this amazing
pipe dream?
Harry K
Mr A Clarke
"harry k" <turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ee410aa5-e0d8-4c9d...@u9g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
harry k
>
<snip a batch of confusion due to Mr. Clarks idiot top posting>
>
> So when are you going to step up to the plate and show us this amazing
> pipe dream?
>
> Harry K- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Per you, you have a working model. What is holding you back?
Harry K
mark krawczuk
"schoolgirl motor" that drove the science teachers crazy because it was
way too efficient and could not be explained by our textbook theory)
MMMM NO YOU CANT ,,,,,, THOUGHT SO.....
"harry k" <turnk...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ccf97776-6cde-43e0...@35g2000prt.googlegroups.com...