Received: by 10.68.190.104 with SMTP id gp8mr271741pbc.4.1340298680865;
        Thu, 21 Jun 2012 10:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
Path: l9ni3893pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news4.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Tom P <werot...@freent.dd>
Newsgroups: alt.energy.homepower
Subject: Re: A LENR Explanation
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:11:18 +0200
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <a4h2tnFfgdU1@mid.individual.net>
References: <8b6fc$4fd659bd$4b4c116f$8702@KNOLOGY.NET> <jr62th$270$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: individual.net 6fAUDXZAd729meQ4UQuy0Q0Ai8Xmd4vQfTMJxUsYKp7gKcZGaLII3BmSe6C32l9YE=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ERi/bE/Me9dZ1DuKpaq+JSInMak=
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120430 Thunderbird/12.0.1
In-Reply-To: <jr62th$270$1@speranza.aioe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 06/12/2012 02:36 AM, Morris Dovey wrote:
> On 6/11/12 3:49 PM, amdx wrote:
>>
>> I found this explanation of interest.
>>
>> http://coldfusionnow.org/explaining-lenr/
>>
>> There is a reference to resonance, I can't
>> figure out if this is a naturally occurring resonance or
>> external energy applied at a resonant frequency.
>> If anyone has a clue, please let me know.
>
> It's interesting, but I don't think the author has much of a clue - and
> I'm inclined to the opinion that he's made unjustified assumptions.
>
> I don't have much of a clue, either. :-)
>

If you read the Student's Guide on the website, you'll see what the 
problem is - any nuclear fusion reaction must produce radiation, 
neutrons or gamma rays. No such effect is observed - meaning there is no 
nuclear reaction.