Re: One True Church of Christ?
Sugar Daddy
> In article
> <43b26121-7399-4c94-aba2-6c524d468...@u30g2000vby.googlegroups.com>, "Dr.
> of LOVE, M.D." <quarke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Jul 6, 11:33 am, r...@somis.org (=95 R. L. Measures.) wrote:
> >> In article <4e1976d9.3133...@news.eternal-september.org>,
>
> >> logan.sac...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> >On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 06:36:49 -0700 (PDT), "Dr. of LOVE, M.D."
> >> ><t2judgm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >>On Jul 4, 11:49 pm, "Peter Olcott" <NoS...@OCR4Screen.com> wrote:
> >> >>> I have been investigating the church for several years now
> >> >>> and this seems amiss.
> >> >>> It seems that truth is an all-or-none thing, If doctrine is
> >> >>> not infallibly correct, then it can not aptly called truth.
> >> >>> Since all doctrine comes through inherently fallible human
> >> >>> beings, all doctrine is possibly subject to at some least
> >> >>> traces of error.
>
> >> >>The doctrines that are pertinent to salvation, for instance the
> >> >>necessity and mode of baptism with proper authority to be recognized
> >> >>by Jesus Christ are not in dispute among the saints.
>
> >> >How do we know that they are doctrines pertinent to salvation in the
> >> >first place?
>
> >> =95 Nobody knows Logan,
>
> >I think logan would disagree with you that nobody knows him.
>
> chortle
• R. L. Measures.
<1c7e7caa-fe5d-421f...@fv14g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
Sugar Daddy <yos...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>On Jul 6, 7:46=A0pm, r...@somis.org (=95 R. L. Measures.) wrote:
>> In article
>> <43b26121-7399-4c94-aba2-6c524d468...@u30g2000vby.googlegroups.com>, "Dr.
>> of LOVE, M.D." <quarke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Jul 6, 11:33 am, r...@somis.org (=3D95 R. L. Measures.) wrote:
>> >> In article <4e1976d9.3133...@news.eternal-september.org>,
>>
>> >> logan.sac...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >> >On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 06:36:49 -0700 (PDT), "Dr. of LOVE, M.D."
>> >> ><t2judgm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >>On Jul 4, 11:49 pm, "Peter Olcott" <NoS...@OCR4Screen.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> I have been investigating the church for several years now
>> >> >>> and this seems amiss.
>> >> >>> It seems that truth is an all-or-none thing, If doctrine is
>> >> >>> not infallibly correct, then it can not aptly called truth.
>> >> >>> Since all doctrine comes through inherently fallible human
>> >> >>> beings, all doctrine is possibly subject to at some least
>> >> >>> traces of error.
>>
>> >> >>The doctrines that are pertinent to salvation, for instance the
>> >> >>necessity and mode of baptism with proper authority to be recognized
>> >> >>by Jesus Christ are not in dispute among the saints.
>>
>> >> >How do we know that they are doctrines pertinent to salvation in the
>> >> >first place?
>>
>> >> =3D95 =A0Nobody knows Logan,
>>
>> >I think logan would disagree with you that nobody knows him.
>>
>> chortle
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DDU_ggFovJNo&feature=3Drelated
"The video you have requested is not available."
--
Richard L. Measures. AG6K, 805-386-3734, www.somis.org
Shift 7 or Ampersand
> "The video you have requested is not available."
So?
• R. L. Measures.
<7b9f622c-6e24-4439...@m18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>, Shift
7 or Ampersand <quar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jul 8, 11:39=A0am, r...@somis.org (=95 R. L. Measures.) wrote:
>
>> "The video you have requested is not available."
>
>So?
** Post something that IS.
&
> In article
> <7b9f622c-6e24-4439-a335-b1d2b7de9...@m18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>, Shift
> 7 or Ampersand <quarke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >On Jul 8, 11:39=A0am, r...@somis.org (=95 R. L. Measures.) wrote:
>
> >> "The video you have requested is not available."
>
> >So?
>
> ** Post something that IS.
It was.
And you don't make demands.
• R. L. Measures.
<3323224b-cac1-4226...@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, "&"
<t2jud...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jul 9, 5:18=A0am, r...@somis.org (=95 R. L. Measures.) wrote:
>> In article
>> <7b9f622c-6e24-4439-a335-b1d2b7de9...@m18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>, Shif=
>t
>> 7 or Ampersand <quarke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >On Jul 8, 11:39=3DA0am, r...@somis.org (=3D95 R. L. Measures.) wrote:
>>
>> >> "The video you have requested is not available."
>>
>> >So?
>>
>> ** =A0Post something that IS.
>
>It was.
>And you don't make demands.
** So post something else that is not available.
&
>
>
>
>
>
> <t2judgm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jul 9, 5:18=A0am, r...@somis.org (=95 R. L. Measures.) wrote:
> >> In article
> >> <7b9f622c-6e24-4439-a335-b1d2b7de9...@m18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>, Shif=
> >t
> >> 7 or Ampersand <quarke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> >On Jul 8, 11:39=3DA0am, r...@somis.org (=3D95 R. L. Measures.) wrote:
>
> >> >> "The video you have requested is not available."
>
> >> >So?
>
> >> ** =A0Post something that IS.
>
> >It was.
> >And you don't make demands.
>
> ** So post something else that is not available.
Which part of you don't make demands didn't you understand?
• R. L. Measures.
<e9d459d3-f4a4-44d2...@m10g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>, "&"
<t2jud...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Jul 9, 6:15=A0pm, r...@somis.org (=95 R. L. Measures.) wrote:
>> In article
>> <3323224b-cac1-4226-afc5-dfa8934f8...@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>, "&"
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <t2judgm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Jul 9, 5:18=3DA0am, r...@somis.org (=3D95 R. L. Measures.) wrote:
>> >> In article
>> >> <7b9f622c-6e24-4439-a335-b1d2b7de9...@m18g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>, S=
>hif=3D
>> >t
>> >> 7 or Ampersand <quarke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> >On Jul 8, 11:39=3D3DA0am, r...@somis.org (=3D3D95 R. L. Measures.) wr=
>ote:
>>
>> >> >> "The video you have requested is not available."
>>
>> >> >So?
>>
>> >> ** =3DA0Post something that IS.
>>
>> >It was.
>> >And you don't make demands.
>>
>> ** =A0So post something else that is not available.
>
>Which part of you don't make demands didn't you understand?
** the sins of the fathers are visited on the children.