just when man thought he had Nature really tamed and completely under control....

karmabum

unread,

Mar 31, 2012, 10:01:49 PM3/31/12

to

### - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51yQ7vxKQkE

...nature let him know in no uncertain terms that it was all just only in his
mind...

(heh meet mr balls, first name claude? :)

and here endeth the lesson ;-)

Jeremy H. Donovan

unread,

Apr 3, 2012, 7:21:32 PM4/3/12

to

I don't think anyone should ever be trying to 'tame Nature'.

Utilize it, yes.
https://www.llnl.gov/news/newsreleases/2012/Mar/NR-12-03-02.html

thang ornerythinchus

unread,

Apr 11, 2012, 7:34:35 AM4/11/12

to

Define your terms fool. What do you mean by "tame nature"? Build a
dam, harness(tame) fluid dynamics and create pollution free
electricity? Learn agronomics and agriculture, till (tame)the land,
grow flax and cotton and build plant to spin and weave and create
clothing to prevent your plump nudity from freezing in the winter?
I've heard you utter bullshit and thoughtless, illogical prattle in
the past (even when you had the pride to consider yourself superior in
some way to most other people - remember seven or eight years ago?),
but this one - no one should ever try to tame nature - takes the cake.

What has happened to you? You used to be *worth* talking to.

Oh yes, I'm a professional wordsmith - I write for a living and
clients gladly pay me for my skills. "Utilize" is among my pet hates.
Why not use "use" instead of utilizing "utilize"? You probably say
"orientated" instead of "oriented" too. Do you know how to spell
"affectation"? You Yanks.

thang

Jeremy H. Donovan

unread,

Apr 17, 2012, 6:55:08 PM4/17/12

to

On Apr 11, 4:34 am, thang ornerythinchus <bl...@whomedunnit.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 16:21:32 -0700 (PDT), "Jeremy H. Donovan"
>

Utilize this, professional idiot... :)

Wow, I post something as awesomely cool as that development in fusion
and your only 'response' is this incoherent, irrelevant sh*t... If
you actually can't see the difference between utilizing forces of
nature and 'taming' them, then you're an even bigger idiot than I
thought before.

thang ornerythinchus

unread,

Apr 18, 2012, 5:27:43 AM4/18/12

to

I responded to your second post of the LL labs' work - care to read it
junior?

My reason for biting you on the throat in *this* thread was because
you posted *this* unsolicited and inappropriate crap elsewhere, so I
thought I might take the time to bait you a little:

"Thang, after carefully reading your 'response', I'm back to the same
place I'm always in with you: wondering how anyone in his or her
right mind would ever want to talk with you? That the health of our
oceans is currently in mortal peril is absolutely not in any doubt
whatsoever. There are garbage heaps the size of Texas in the middle
of our oceans right now. Many major species of major game fish that
we've eaten for hundreds of years are severely depleted to dangerous
levels. Coral are kind of like the canary in the coal mine when it
comes to oceans, and the world's coral are in mortal peril. One thing
I can always count on is: you never know shit, Thang."

An ostensibly mature man who uses words and phrases like "awesomely
cool" is hardly worth the time to bait. Find someone to agree with
you and your little suburban pathetic life will be just hunky dorey.

cordial regards

thang

Jeremy H. Donovan

unread,

Apr 20, 2012, 4:46:46 PM4/20/12

to

Yeah, thanks for your completely worthless 'input', douche bag.
Actually, the reason you 'respond' to anything is always the same:
that you're a douche bag. :)

thang ornerythinchus

unread,

Apr 20, 2012, 5:44:24 PM4/20/12

to

Because a tired perplexed ex-cultist and intellectually limited naive
follower says so, yea, it must be so!

have a nice day and thanks for the entertainment

thang

>
>
>