Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: So what is a USN admiral doing leading the 'war efforts' in Iraq and Afghanistan, anywho? Blame GWBush, he installed Adm. Mike Mullen on 10/1/2007! US military chief wants more troops for Afghan war

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Ice Cream too?

unread,
Sep 17, 2009, 6:19:17 AM9/17/09
to
On Sep 17, 6:14 am, "Ice Cream too?" <cake_and_eat_it_...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2:57 pm, "Ouroboros Rex" <i...@casual.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > billzz wrote:
> > > On Sep 16, 9:22 am, "Ouroboros Rex" <i...@casual.com> wrote:
> > >> Daniel wrote:
> > >>> On Sep 16, 10:41 am, "Ice Cream too?"
> > >>> <cake_and_eat_it_...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >>>>http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090916/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_us_afghanistan
>
> > >>>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admiral_Mike_Mullen
> > >>>> Admiral Michael Glenn "Mike" Mullen, USN
> > >>>> current Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (CJCS)
>
> > >>>> Mike, just a tip, fewwa, from someone in the know. You need to lose
> > >>>> the glasses, bubba! Either you wear your motherfunken glasses ALL
> > >>>> the time,
> > >>>> or else you don't fucken need 'em, maggot! You have far enough
> > >>>> money to buy yourself some contacts, maggot, and, besides you are
> > >>>> on that very wonderful US Navy healthcare, maggot, so you go ahead
> > >>>> and you fucken pay the copay on those contacts, maggot, or else
> > >>>> you shall wear NOTHING, maggot! Am i making myself perfectly
> > >>>> clear, maggot?!? now you shut the fuck up, Mike Mullen, you very
> > >>>> sorry puke maggot named to your post by the evil, UnAmerican
> > >>>> GWBush shyster, maggot, and you get the fuck out of here asking
> > >>>> for an even bigger handout, maggot! do i make myself perfectly
> > >>>> fucking clear, maggot? good, my maggot, you go ahead and quit your
> > >>>> sorry ass, goddamn it begging for more money (and, yes, for every
> > >>>> penny expended under your watch we well know you collect a
> > >>>> commission), you sorry goddamnit maggot, and you go ahead and get
> > >>>> your skivvies on, maggot, and you go out in the field, you old man
> > >>>> maggot, and you die along with the rest of the troops, maggot, and
> > >>>> set an example for them, you sorry ass repuglicunt maggot! do i
> > >>>> make myself very dreadfully clear, maggot? yes,
> > >>>> get up off your stupid, ugly, oafish, gaumless ass, maggot, and you
> > >>>> finally do some work again, maggot, as if you ever did do any
> > >>>> work at all, maggot!
>
> > >>>> alt.military.psywar,alt.military,us.military.army,cakewalk.coffeehouse,alt.­­­politics
>
> > >>>> So what is a USN admiral doing leading the 'war efforts' in Iraq
> > >>>> and Afghanistan, anywho? Blame GWBush, he installed Adm. Mike
> > >>>> Mullen on 10/1/2007! US military chief wants more troops for
> > >>>> Afghan war
>
> > >>> You're an idiot. You mean to tell me that you didn't know that the
> > >>> Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staff rotates between the services?
> > >>> Yet more proof that libtards have no business dealing with military
> > >>> matters.
>
> > >> I'll bet I can go out on any streetcorner, poll ten admitted
> > >> republicans, and none of them will know it.
>
> > > I was a student at The National War College, and we studied the
> > > Organization of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.  It is only by tradition,
> > > during peacetime, that the chair rotates.  The Secretary of Defense
> > > can recommend anyone, and the pick of a navy admiral, to head what is
> > > obviously an army and marine corps war, shows that the leadership does
> > > not know what it is doing.
>
> >   Now that you explain it, it does sound odd.  Major source of air support,
> > maybe...?
>
> >   The selection of an undermanned force
>
> > > structure versus the one proposed by General Shinseki also showed that
> > > the former Secretary of Defense did not know what he was doing.  He
> > > tried to do it on the cheap, just like he did in Vietnam, providing
> > > not enough force structure to control, just enough to hide out in
> > > enclaves and go out on patrol, to be ambushed.  Now they are talking
> > > about "surge" or "plus-up" (anything to avoid the use of the term
> > > "escalation" which was used in Vietnam.  The problem is still the
> > > same:  not enough force structure.
>
> >   Yep.  The spring 2003 tax cuts had just been kicked back by Congress at
> > the time.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> yeah, a bunch of gutless cowards, alright, what with their 'smart
> bombs from on high' reining down unmitigated mayhem on the fine,
> innocent, nice, and kind citizens of both iraq and afghanistan from
> the comfort, and, yes, safety, of their sinning airplanes of death
> from high above.  that's, why i always wish i had my gun with me when
> i am near air force bases as those planes are just about to come
> down.... to rein just and due punishment on those nasty cowards in
> those air force planes.  woe be unto them if i ever do get close
> enough to shrap them!
>
> bwahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!
>
> and so goes MY psyops, peeps.....!!!!
>
> alt.military.psywar, alt.military, us.military.army,
> cakewalk.coffeehouse, alt.politics- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

KABLOOMEY!!!!!

0 new messages