Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Impressionist Art (Was: Proposal)

0 views
Skip to first unread message

GENLO...@delphi.com

unread,
Aug 14, 1998, 3:00:00 AM8/14/98
to
In article <01bdc662$8ea7d3e0$4e58...@GB-078.gsbme.unsw.edu.au>, "Geoffrey
Brent" <g.b...@student.unsw.unsw.edu.au> writes:

[nibble]

> No, because Daphnie also holds responsibility for this incident
> and she has _not_ been "dealt with".

Deal with it.

-- General LonGears

*Fouriers* expressing moral outrage?!? Puh-leeez!


Anne Michelle Forbes

unread,
Aug 14, 1998, 3:00:00 AM8/14/98
to
GENLO...@delphi.com wrote:
>
> *Fouriers* expressing moral outrage?!? Puh-leeez!

Ah! It must be tea-time-- the kettle's whistling shrilly! ;)

--Pvt. Sarah Martel

Geoffrey Brent

unread,
Aug 17, 1998, 3:00:00 AM8/17/98
to
My email address is spam-protected. To reply,
remove the duplicate.

GENLO...@delphi.com wrote in article <01J0LYPBH...@delphi.com>...


> In article <01bdc662$8ea7d3e0$4e58...@GB-078.gsbme.unsw.edu.au>,
"Geoffrey
> Brent" <g.b...@student.unsw.unsw.edu.au> writes:
>
> [nibble]
>
> > No, because Daphnie also holds responsibility for this incident
> > and she has _not_ been "dealt with".
>
> Deal with it.

You're such a card, General.*

> -- General LonGears


>
> *Fouriers* expressing moral outrage?!? Puh-leeez!

<shrug> Well, if you can denigrate the Fudds' sexual
prowess, why not ?

Art Black
Fourier

*Major Arcana 0, to be precise.

0 new messages