Veronica Sucks-Cock Karlsson...Jealously Enraged Snit...Or Simply Out Of Date?
Onideus Mad Hatter
I thought it might be kinda fun to point out *HER* website (singular)
for everyone:
http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/
...woah. I mean...holy shit. It looks like some long lost remnant of
HTML v1 coding, slopped together without any sense of style, color
theory, or usability. Hell the bitch is so the fuck out of date she's
still relying on TABLES for CONTENT LAYOUT! o_O
I mean...holy shit. Even the most pathetic of amateur class college
flunkies can figure out division layers, hell I even wrote a basic FAQ
for how to use them:
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.2600/msg/dc582b7a21b9f0e1
...and trust me, it doesn't *GET* any more basic than *THAT*. *rolls
eyes*
This doofy little retard is so the fuck out dated she still has a BLUE
RIBBON on her site (as a poorly compressed GIF I might add), despite
the fact that the blue ribbon campaign essentially went dead
like...over a DECADE ago. Hell, this dipshit is *SO* out of date
she's still using CLIP ART on her site! Single color clip art at
that.
Here, wait, this is even funnier, check out what her server directory
structure looks like:
http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/pics/ascii/chat/archive/
Oh and uh, do note the fact that she's still working on the folder for
TWO THOUSAND. Yup, that's right, Veronica Sucks-Cock Karlsson is
essentially trapped back the fuck in the year 2000. Perhaps it's some
strange temporal anomaly having to do with Y2K? Perhaps some alien
technology was implanted up her fat ugly ass and when the year 2K came
along her anal probe just wasn't Y2K compliant. *nods* That's really
the only plausible explanation I can think of for just how incredibly
out of date she is.
...on the other hand though I think she's from some third world
country over in Europe that everyone else forgot about, so maybe
they're just not very advanced...or their backwards government
restricts their computer learning to everything dated BEFORE 1997. LOL
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
mhm � x �
http://www.backwater-productions.net
http://www.uncensored-inter.net
Hatter Quotes
-------------
"Freedom, true freedom, is nothing more than intellectual advantage over others."
"When I listen to people I don't really listen to what it is they're
saying, so much as what they're saying it for."
"Don't ever fuck with someone who has more creativity than you do."
"You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one of the
best."
"I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch slapped you
with it."
"I'm not a professional, I'm an artist."
"Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!"
"Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, my
bad."
"The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols."
"Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful stupidity
of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to further my art?"
"Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social construct
that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to convince others
of its relevancy."
"Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun and start
creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the champagne proper."
"Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are."
"People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think that
they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like they're just
givin em out for free."
"How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't even
properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts."
"Those who record history are those who control history."
"I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its tormentive rage,
endless suffering, unfathomable pain and unending horror...but you
don't get sent to me...I come for you."
"Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton
tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head."
"Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a
function?"
"Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid.
Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the forecast
indicates an increase in Webtv users."
"Is my .sig delimiter broken? Really? You're sure? Awww,
gee...that's too bad...for YOU!" `, )
Emo Haircut
> Well, Snits has been pretty mouthy here lately about *MY* websites, so
> I thought it might be kinda fun to point out *HER* website (singular)
> for everyone:
You seem strangely angry. Is it because you're a loser?
<bought 22 shares of WMT today>
<you work for *me*, bitch>
--
There's one more kid, that'll never go to school
Never get to fall in love, never get to be cool
Keep on rockin' in the free world
Onideus Mad Hatter
<hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> Well, Snits has been pretty mouthy here lately about *MY* websites, so
>> I thought it might be kinda fun to point out *HER* website (singular)
>> for everyone:
>You seem strangely angry.
You really ought not to project your own feelings on Usenet. Still,
it does give me a nice warm fuzzy feeling to know that my post enraged
you so much. Is it because you have a crush on Veronica? *nods*
Yeah, I think so. You're her knight in shining stupidity, aren't you?
><bought 22 shares of WMT today>
>
><you work for *me*, bitch>
LOL, I own over 200 shares of Wal*Mart stock, Sunshine, so you've got
quite a ways to go. In fact, nearly all the money I make at Wal*Mart
is put directly into stock (unless I take a break on the contract
jobs). The one thing I love about Wal*Mart stock is that it actually
THRIVES during times of economic depression/recession...that and it's
easy to manipulate by countering the efforts of the various Wal*Mart
haet froups:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_Scraps/Personal_-_Walmart_Stock.png
No stock is more stable than Wal*Mart...period.
Emo Haircut
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:04:37 -0600, Emo Haircut
> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> Well, Snits has been pretty mouthy here lately about *MY* websites, so
>>> I thought it might be kinda fun to point out *HER* website (singular)
>>> for everyone:
>
>> You seem strangely angry.
>
> You really ought not to project your own feelings on Usenet.
No, really, you do.
> Still,
> it does give me a nice warm fuzzy feeling to know that my post enraged
> you so much. Is it because you have a crush on Veronica? *nods*
> Yeah, I think so. You're her knight in shining stupidity, aren't you?
Dunno. Is she hot?
>> <bought 22 shares of WMT today>
>>
>> <you work for *me*, bitch>
>
> LOL, I own over 200 shares of Wal*Mart stock, Sunshine, so you've got
> quite a ways to go. In fact, nearly all the money I make at Wal*Mart
> is put directly into stock (unless I take a break on the contract
> jobs). The one thing I love about Wal*Mart stock is that it actually
> THRIVES during times of economic depression/recession...that and it's
> easy to manipulate by countering the efforts of the various Wal*Mart
> haet froups:
> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_Scraps/Personal_-_Walmart_Stock.png
Nice link, guru. WMT is down 20 percent since then. lulz.
> No stock is more stable than Wal*Mart...period.
Stable = dropped 20 percent since you built your wanky little WMT fanboi
page.
Good for me: value investor, buying *after* the crash, looking for
bargains and quick turnarounds (small buys, spread far and wide amongst
the "blue chips", portfolio up 11 percent this month)
Bad for you: moronic twat who says a sinking stock is "stable", and
apparently has no cloo about investing.
Onideus Mad Hatter
<hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> You seem strangely angry.
>> You really ought not to project your own feelings on Usenet.
>No, really, you do.
Still angry and frustrated, are you? Don't worry, I'm only going to
make your butthurt worse...especially after I fuck you up the ass with
your own stupidity (and boy there's a LOT of it). ^__^
>> Still,
>> it does give me a nice warm fuzzy feeling to know that my post enraged
>> you so much. Is it because you have a crush on Veronica? *nods*
>> Yeah, I think so. You're her knight in shining stupidity, aren't you?
>Dunno. Is she hot?
Well if you're into old women I guess. Pretty sure this is her
picture:
http://www.ekapija.com/dokumenti/Veronica_Karlsson.gif
>Nice link, guru. WMT is down 20 percent since then. lulz.
And every other stock is down about 60% since then...what's your
point, Retard? What, did your dumbass just MISS the whole economic
fuck over? The fact that Wal*Mart was able to easily survive and
recover so quickly from the economic downturn is absolute proof of its
stability, you drooling idiot.
Emo Haircut
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:09:59 -0600, Emo Haircut
> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>> You seem strangely angry.
>
>>> You really ought not to project your own feelings on Usenet.
>
>> No, really, you do.
>
> Still angry and frustrated, are you?
No, but *you* sure appear so. Not being a psychic, I can't say you
actually *are* angry. Only a fool would do that (see your comments
above).
However, you certainly *seem* angry. Is it because you're a loser?
> Don't worry, I'm only going to
> make your butthurt worse...especially after I fuck you up the ass with
> your own stupidity (and boy there's a LOT of it). ^__^
>
>>> Still,
>>> it does give me a nice warm fuzzy feeling to know that my post enraged
>>> you so much. Is it because you have a crush on Veronica? *nods*
>>> Yeah, I think so. You're her knight in shining stupidity, aren't you?
>
>> Dunno. Is she hot?
>
> Well if you're into old women I guess. Pretty sure this is her
> picture:
> http://www.ekapija.com/dokumenti/Veronica_Karlsson.gif
She's an attractive woman, and it's rather funny listening to a guy who
wears a diaper go on about the attractiveness of others.
>> Nice link, guru. WMT is down 20 percent since then. lulz.
>
> And every other stock is down about 60% since then
Oh my, that's a rather broad generalization that the facts simply do not
support. Wal-mart has done ok during the recession because, unlike more
upscale stores, their profits have not taken a hit. Target (TGT) has
shown similar performance. (people shop bargains during hard times)
I'm ever so glad to have contributed to your education.
> ...what's your
> point, Retard? What, did your dumbass just MISS the whole economic
> fuck over? The fact that Wal*Mart was able to easily survive and
> recover so quickly from the economic downturn is absolute proof of its
> stability, you drooling idiot.
lulz
See what I meant about that anger thing? You really should get that
looked at.
Does Wal Mart offer an employee mental health benefit?
ah
Onideus Mad Hatter
Awww, are you all angry and upset? Tsch, tsch, tsch, the sloppy bitch
should have kept her idiot mouth shut if she didn't want to play.
Apparently she missed the meeting regarding the whole, "Don't do to
others what you wouldn't want done to yourself...and worse."
The fact that she's trying to belittle and attack *MY* work when her
own work is so far below the level of absolute crap, is pretty much an
instant invitation to getting verbally fucked up the ass in every
other direction. She has no one to blame but herself and she
certainly doesn't need any halfwitted retards liak yourself trying to
be her knight in shining idiocy.
Emo Haircut
>
> Awww, are you all angry and upset? Tsch, tsch, tsch, the sloppy bitch
> should have kept her idiot mouth shut if she didn't want to play.
> Apparently she missed the meeting regarding the whole, "Don't do to
> others what you wouldn't want done to yourself...and worse."
>
> The fact that she's trying to belittle and attack *MY* work when her
> own work is so far below the level of absolute crap, is pretty much an
> instant invitation to getting verbally fucked up the ass in every
> other direction. She has no one to blame but herself and she
> certainly doesn't need any halfwitted retards liak yourself trying to
> be her knight in shining idiocy.
I'm starting to get concerned about you. All this rage is unhealthy.
Onideus Mad Hatter
<hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Still angry and frustrated, are you?
>No, but *you* sure appear so.
...uh huh, right. Here's a free cl00 for ya, Kiddo...if you *WEREN'T*
angry and frustrated...you probably wouldn't be retarding back into
such infantile verbal comebacks. Honestly, when it reaches the point
where you're trying to steal material from Pee Wee Herman...yeah, yer
done, put it down, time for your nap.
>Not being a psychic, I can't say you
>actually *are* angry. Only a fool would do that (see your comments
>above).
>
>However, you certainly *seem* angry. Is it because you're a loser?
I can pass the MHM test...you can't. That proves that you're angry
and upset whilst I cannot ever be angry or upset over mere words.
*shrugs* Don't get all pissy and indignant with me though, it's not
my fault that words can hurt you. I didn't make reality, I just
verbally fucked you up the ass with it. ^__^
>>> Dunno. Is she hot?
>> Well if you're into old women I guess. Pretty sure this is her
>> picture:
>> http://www.ekapija.com/dokumenti/Veronica_Karlsson.gif
>She's an attractive woman,
*snicker*
Oh my, you really do have such "lowered expectations" when it comes to
"attractive women", huh? Not that it should be much of a surprise,
most ugly people like yourself know you're ugly and know you can't do
any better than what you look like yourself. As such you've pretty
much resigned yourself to the "bottom of the fish barrel"...of course
it's even worse for you, what with how you can only shoot blanks. LOL
BTW, wanna know how I know that you're ugly? It's because you don't
post pictures of yourself online. If you were good looking (like me)
then you would have no problems posting pictures of yourself and would
actually enjoy showing off your looks...
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_Photos/Class_Prom_Pic.swf
Heck even as a child I was too cute for words:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_Photos/Jaba.jpg
>and it's rather funny listening to a guy who
>wears a diaper go on about the attractiveness of others.
I only wear a diaper for your mother, and only because it gets her
real hot and excited...apparently it reminds her of the times she
molested you as a toddler. Do you wanna talk about that? *nods* Come
on, it's okay, it'll make you feel better to talk about your childhood
molestation.
>> And every other stock is down about 60% since then
>Oh my, that's a rather broad generalization that the facts simply do not
>support.
...wow...I mean...holy shit d00d, could you ~possibly~ make yourself
look any stupider? *rolls eyes* Apparently in Retard Land, where
this dipshit came from, there wasn't any economic downfall at all and
everything is just happy bubbles and sunshine all around. *snicker*
>Wal-mart has done ok during the recession because, unlike more
>upscale stores, their profits have not taken a hit. Target (TGT) has
>shown similar performance. (people shop bargains during hard times)
Uh, hello, Dipshit, earth to Dipshit, come in Dipshit. What the fuck
did I *JUST* get through explaining in my last post? Dee, dee, dee!
>I'm ever so glad to have contributed to your education.
...he says after ripping off what I wrote and rewording it...quite
poorly at that.
I wonder if he realizes he's doing it though...I mean it's possible
that he's just so entirely fucking stupid that he doesn't even
comprehend on any coherent level that he's simply rewording what I
wrote and essentially arguing with himself.
>> ...what's your
>> point, Retard? What, did your dumbass just MISS the whole economic
>> fuck over? The fact that Wal*Mart was able to easily survive and
>> recover so quickly from the economic downturn is absolute proof of its
>> stability, you drooling idiot.
>lulz
What the fuck are you some 4chan reject?
>See what I meant about that anger thing?
Uh, free cl00...going out of your way to try and get people to think
that you're laughing and having a good time...yeah, pretty much solid
proof of the contrary. If you were *REALLY* having a good time and
enjoying this exchange you wouldn't have such a *NEED* to try and
convince everybody of it. No, the truth is yer just a butthurt little
snit who wants to try and lash out at dat mean 'ol Mad Hatter cause I
all went and hurted yer wittle virtual feewings, now didn't I? *nods*
Cry now, Pussy. Maybe some day you can grow the fuck up and manage to
get an MHM number...after yer balls finally drop, but until
then...WORDS HURT YOU. That is an undeniable fact for anyone who
can't pass the test.
>Does Wal Mart offer an employee mental health benefit?
Sorry, but no amount of mental health is going to be able to fix you.
You just can't fix stupid, ya know? *shrugs* Sorry d00d, but your
whole life is going to amount to little more than a pointless waste of
good oxygen. You could always kill yourself as a gift to humanity
though...at least that way you could have some level of meaning in
your pathetic little existence.
Onideus Mad Hatter
<hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>
>>
>> Awww, are you all angry and upset? Tsch, tsch, tsch, the sloppy bitch
>> should have kept her idiot mouth shut if she didn't want to play.
>> Apparently she missed the meeting regarding the whole, "Don't do to
>> others what you wouldn't want done to yourself...and worse."
>>
>> The fact that she's trying to belittle and attack *MY* work when her
>> own work is so far below the level of absolute crap, is pretty much an
>> instant invitation to getting verbally fucked up the ass in every
>> other direction. She has no one to blame but herself and she
>> certainly doesn't need any halfwitted retards liak yourself trying to
>> be her knight in shining idiocy.
>
>I'm starting to get concerned about you. All this rage is unhealthy.
...you really are a one-trick lame artist, aren't you? I mean, is
that *REALLY* the only comeback you've got?
Tsch, tsch, tsch...you best start producing better, child...lest you
want one of my bots to babysit you.
Emo Haircut
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 19:44:29 -0600, Emo Haircut
> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> Still angry and frustrated, are you?
>
>> No, but *you* sure appear so.
>
> ...uh huh, right. Here's a free cl00 for ya, Kiddo...if you *WEREN'T*
> angry and frustrated...you probably wouldn't be retarding back into
> such infantile verbal comebacks. Honestly, when it reaches the point
> where you're trying to steal material from Pee Wee Herman...yeah, yer
> done, put it down, time for your nap.
>
>> Not being a psychic, I can't say you
>> actually *are* angry. Only a fool would do that (see your comments
>> above).
>>
>> However, you certainly *seem* angry. Is it because you're a loser?
>
> I can pass the MHM test...you can't. That proves that you're angry
> and upset whilst I cannot ever be angry or upset over mere words.
> *shrugs* Don't get all pissy and indignant with me though, it's not
> my fault that words can hurt you. I didn't make reality, I just
> verbally fucked you up the ass with it. ^__^
>
Bla bla bla, if you keep sucking your own dick like that, you'll get a
crick in your neck.
>>>> Dunno. Is she hot?
>
>>> Well if you're into old women I guess. Pretty sure this is her
>>> picture:
>>> http://www.ekapija.com/dokumenti/Veronica_Karlsson.gif
>
>> She's an attractive woman,
>
> *snicker*
>
> Oh my, you really do have such "lowered expectations" when it comes to
> "attractive women", huh? Not that it should be much of a surprise,
> most ugly people like yourself know you're ugly and know you can't do
> any better than what you look like yourself. As such you've pretty
> much resigned yourself to the "bottom of the fish barrel"...of course
> it's even worse for you, what with how you can only shoot blanks. LOL
>
> BTW, wanna know how I know that you're ugly? It's because you don't
> post pictures of yourself online. If you were good looking (like me)
> then you would have no problems posting pictures of yourself and would
> actually enjoy showing off your looks...
> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_Photos/Class_Prom_Pic.swf
How wonderful to see you crazy kids all grown up. I remember back when
you were younger...
http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e310/kensock/tardclass2.jpg
Which one are you? Beavis? Confused Pete?
> Heck even as a child I was too cute for words:
> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_Photos/Jaba.jpg
>
>> and it's rather funny listening to a guy who
>> wears a diaper go on about the attractiveness of others.
>
> I only wear a diaper
Yeah, I know. I'm sure you look real fetching in it.
>>> And every other stock is down about 60% since then
>
>> Oh my, that's a rather broad generalization that the facts simply do not
>> support.
>
> ...wow...I mean...holy shit d00d, could you ~possibly~ make yourself
> look any stupider? *rolls eyes* Apparently in Retard Land, where
> this dipshit came from, there wasn't any economic downfall at all and
> everything is just happy bubbles and sunshine all around. *snicker*
Apparently, in "don't know shit about the market but want to bluff my
way through a discussion", every stock on every index fell by an
identical 60 percent.
As I've already pointed out in a futile attempt to make you smarter,
Target (for a single example) is down by 20%, not 60.
Gosh, you sure are excitable. Is that why you wear a diaper?
Emo Haircut
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:22:29 -0600, Emo Haircut
> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>
>>> Awww, are you all angry and upset? Tsch, tsch, tsch, the sloppy bitch
>>> should have kept her idiot mouth shut if she didn't want to play.
>>> Apparently she missed the meeting regarding the whole, "Don't do to
>>> others what you wouldn't want done to yourself...and worse."
>>>
>>> The fact that she's trying to belittle and attack *MY* work when her
>>> own work is so far below the level of absolute crap, is pretty much an
>>> instant invitation to getting verbally fucked up the ass in every
>>> other direction. She has no one to blame but herself and she
>>> certainly doesn't need any halfwitted retards liak yourself trying to
>>> be her knight in shining idiocy.
>> I'm starting to get concerned about you. All this rage is unhealthy.
>
> ...you really are a one-trick lame artist, aren't you? I mean, is
> that *REALLY* the only comeback you've got?
>
> Tsch, tsch, tsch...you best start producing better, child...lest you
> want one of my bots to babysit you.
Christ, you're boring enough to be a bot. You mean it could be worse?
Onideus Mad Hatter
<hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:22:29 -0600, Emo Haircut
>> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>
>>>> Awww, are you all angry and upset? Tsch, tsch, tsch, the sloppy bitch
>>>> should have kept her idiot mouth shut if she didn't want to play.
>>>> Apparently she missed the meeting regarding the whole, "Don't do to
>>>> others what you wouldn't want done to yourself...and worse."
>>>>
>>>> The fact that she's trying to belittle and attack *MY* work when her
>>>> own work is so far below the level of absolute crap, is pretty much an
>>>> instant invitation to getting verbally fucked up the ass in every
>>>> other direction. She has no one to blame but herself and she
>>>> certainly doesn't need any halfwitted retards liak yourself trying to
>>>> be her knight in shining idiocy.
>>> I'm starting to get concerned about you. All this rage is unhealthy.
>>
>> ...you really are a one-trick lame artist, aren't you? I mean, is
>> that *REALLY* the only comeback you've got?
>>
>> Tsch, tsch, tsch...you best start producing better, child...lest you
>> want one of my bots to babysit you.
>
>Christ, you're boring enough to be a bot. You mean it could be worse?
A lovely IKY lame there, Pee Wee. Don't worry, no one was expecting
better out of the boring little retard who can't come up with anything
better than, "Hurr, hurr, I mad u is teh angree!!1!"
Honestly Spittles, the only possible outcome to engaging with me is
butthurt on your part. Trying to verbally spar against someone with a
true MHM is like trying to attack a tank with a toothpick. Are you
*REALLY* that fuckin stupid? Or are you just some kind of a closet
masochist? Do you get off on having people verbally beat on you?
I suppose maybe your parents were just *REAL* neglectful to you as a
child, that might explain your little need to try and get
attention...the only way you know how. To put it bluntly you simply
don't understand how to interact normally with others on the social
level, so you just lash out and act out like a pissy little spoiled
brat to try and get any attention you can. After all, if someone were
a pathetic as you, well, negative attention is better than no
attention, huh?
Feel free to run and hide again, Downs. I know how much you're afraid
of me, so it's not much of a surprise when you try and alter the froup
line like the PUSSY that you are. ^__^
Emo Haircut
Emo: 1 line of text, 14 words.
Oedipus: Multi-paragraph kookscreed of epic dimensions.
Emo <---- Troll troller.
Onideus Mad Hatter
<hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
Oh boy, you know your opponent has failed epically when their only
recourse is to try and show off their incredible lack of education and
inability to type more than two lines of text per post. I suppose I
can try and dumb all my posts down to his 3rd grade reading level, but
then, honestly, my replies really aren't for him so much as they are
for my readership.
Downs really isn't much more than a convenient canvas for me to paint
my invective word art onto and, quite frankly, I couldn't even sum up
the slightest bother to care whether or not his dumbass walked right
the fuck on out into traffic and got hit by a semi, let alone whether
or not he even had enough intelligence (or Ritalin) to actually read
through one of my posts.
Not to mention of course that it's actually far more entertaining to
make posts that are beyond his reading and writing ability, as it
obviously frustrates him to no end. ^__^
Emo Haircut
Emo: 3 lines of text, 17 words.
Oedipus: On and on and on......
Emo <---- Teh troller of trolls
Onideus Mad Hatter
<hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
So, apparently Downs thinks that he's somehow "trolling" me into
pointing out how fuckin stupid he is...WOW...boy that sure is an
accomplishment! *snicker* As if I needed some kind of an invitation
or anything to verbally slap him around like a red headed step child.
The pissy little loser is so upset he won't even reply directly
anymore, knowing that it's just going to make him cry even harder.
LOL, oh and thanks for letting me know just how much you *LOVE* having
ASH in the froup line, I'll be sure to start adding it onto all my
posts now. ^__^
Emo Haircut
I'll bet you haven't noticed you're putting WAY more effort into this
than I am.
Wanna know why?
Emo <---- gets trolls to dance
Onideus Mad Hatter
<hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
That's pretty relative considering that what you think of as "effort"
is pretty much nothing but a trifle for someone of my incredible
intellect. Keep in mind that I'm not a retard like you, Dipshit. It
really doesn't take me any more than few seconds to churn out these
posts considering I can type at over a 130wpm and since you're not
exactly doing anything that I haven't already ripped apart more than a
dozen times before...yeah, yer pretty much fucked! ^__^
>Wanna know why?
>
>Emo <---- gets trolls to dance
Uh huh, sorry kiddo, but getting people to smack you around like a
sloppy bitch isn't a form of trolling so much as it's, well, just
getting smacked around like a sloppy bitch.
Emo Haircut
>>>>>> Emo: 1 line of text, 14 words.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oedipus: Multi-paragraph kookscreed of epic dimensions.
>>>>>> Emo <---- Troll troller.
>>>> Emo: 3 lines of text, 17 words.
>>>>
>>>> Oedipus: On and on and on......
>>>>
>>>> Emo <---- Teh troller of trolls
>> Emo <---- gets trolls to dance
>
> Uh huh, sorry kiddo, but getting people to smack you around like a
> sloppy bitch isn't a form of trolling so much as it's, well, just
> getting smacked around like a sloppy bitch.
Hehe, 2 words:
<ASH removed>
Onideus Mad Hatter
<hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Emo: 1 line of text, 14 words.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oedipus: Multi-paragraph kookscreed of epic dimensions.
>
>>>>>>> Emo <---- Troll troller.
>
>>>>> Emo: 3 lines of text, 17 words.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oedipus: On and on and on......
>>>>>
>>>>> Emo <---- Teh troller of trolls
>
>>> Emo <---- gets trolls to dance
>>
>> Uh huh, sorry kiddo, but getting people to smack you around like a
>> sloppy bitch isn't a form of trolling so much as it's, well, just
>> getting smacked around like a sloppy bitch.
>
>Hehe, 2 words:
>
>
><ASH removed>
Doesn't take much to entertain a retard I guess. It's too bad he's
broken now...I probably should have gone slower...let him breath
between his lames.
Emo Haircut
Onideus Mad Hatter
Onideus Mad Hatter
Onideus Mad Hatter
http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/docs/feedback/
LOL, the doofy retard is actually trying to ~explain~ the way her site
works to a SPAM BOT!
*Hatter nearly dies laughing*
Oh good Christ...LOL...ahahahahahaha...*sigh*...oh man that's just
hilarious. ^__^
It's too bad she's not intelligent enough to prevent spam bots from
sending her spam through her site. She is rather fortunate though
that no one has taken the bother to teach her an important lesson in
coding, because quite frankly it wouldn't take me more than 4 minutes
to code a web bot capable of essentially crashing her entire server in
a matter of minutes via her little online form there.
I think this is the best part though:
: > ------------------------------------------------------------
: >
: > Log info: 20 Nov. 00:57, 62.7.53.2
: >
: > Name: Max
: > Email: No email address
: > Subject: Your web page
: >
: > Message:
: >
: > Dear Veronica if that is your real name (presuming it is.
: > I have one question what is wrong with you? Did all of your
: > friends have web sites and you did'nt so therefore felt
: > left out so came up with this pile of steaming horse shit. I
: > mean come on how the fuck did you come up with something so shit
: > it has to be the worst site I have ever seen in my entire
: > life. Come on women you silly bitch produce something that
: > is worth seeing or nothing at all I can't even say anything
: > good about this site AT ALL because it is just pure shit.
: > GET A GRIP GET A REAL JOB GET A LIFE GET THIS SITE OFF THE
: > NET GET OUT MORE sorry if I have offended you in any
: > way but due to an ill education bad language is the only
: > way I can express my feelings but this site could
: > make a saint call it SHIT cos sorry lady but thats all it is
: > SHIT SHIT SHIT SHIT SHIT SHIT SHIT SHIT SHIT SHIT SHIT SHIT.
: > ------------------------------------------------------------
:
: What is the purpose of a message like that? He obviously doesn't want
: a reply or he'd have left an email address to reply to! (Also, it
: looks a bit too generic to be taken seriously. He could, and probably
: does, send the same text to just about any personal homepage out
: there...)
It's just so incredibly ironic since her NONpinion about my sites
essentially amounts to little more than a dumbed down version of the
exact same message. LOL
What's *REALLY* funny though is that for all the nastiness and
invectiveness that I portray online...yeah...I very rarely ever get
such incredibly nasty, froth worthy e-mails about me and my sites. Of
course, my sites don't look like fucking shit, so...yeah, something to
think about there Veronica.
On a semi off-topic note, I used to know a Veronica, back when I was a
kid and living in California...she was a complete nut job and did
things like cut off cat's whiskers and then stuff them into mail boxes
(sometimes until they died). At one point she even went around
falsely accusing various adults of molesting her (which caused quite a
lot of problems for a lot of different people), but anyway, whenever I
see Veronica post I always think of that little fruit loop. LOL
Bob Larter
> Well, Snits has been pretty mouthy here lately about *MY* websites, so
> I thought it might be kinda fun to point out *HER* website (singular)
> for everyone:
> http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/
>
> ...woah. I mean...holy shit. It looks like some long lost remnant of
> HTML v1 coding, slopped together without any sense of style, color
> theory, or usability. Hell the bitch is so the fuck out of date she's
> still relying on TABLES for CONTENT LAYOUT! o_O
And yet it's a hell of a lot more entertaining than anything on your
site, DiaperBoi.
--
W
. | ,. w , "Some people are alive only because
\|/ \|/ it is illegal to kill them." Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Larter
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:04:37 -0600, Emo Haircut
> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> Well, Snits has been pretty mouthy here lately about *MY* websites, so
>>> I thought it might be kinda fun to point out *HER* website (singular)
>>> for everyone:
>
>> You seem strangely angry.
>
> You really ought not to project your own feelings on Usenet. Still,
> it does give me a nice warm fuzzy feeling to know that my post enraged
> you so much. Is it because you have a crush on Veronica? *nods*
> Yeah, I think so. You're her knight in shining stupidity, aren't you?
>
>> <bought 22 shares of WMT today>
>>
>> <you work for *me*, bitch>
>
> LOL, I own over 200 shares of Wal*Mart stock, Sunshine, so you've got
> quite a ways to go. In fact, nearly all the money I make at Wal*Mart
> is put directly into stock (unless I take a break on the contract
> jobs). The one thing I love about Wal*Mart stock is that it actually
> THRIVES during times of economic depression/recession...that and it's
> easy to manipulate by countering the efforts of the various Wal*Mart
> haet froups:
> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_Scraps/Personal_-_Walmart_Stock.png
>
> No stock is more stable than Wal*Mart...period.
It sure must suck to be a 28 year old virgin shelf-stacker who still
lives with his mommy. Does she still change your diapers for you too?
Veronica Karlsson
*beams*
But no context kept from previous discussion... Is somebody trying to
change the subject? Why? Could it be because his homepage (singular)
sucks? Could it be be cause he has no good answer to the question "Why
should I give you meaningful critique about your homepage?"
*pokes Mad Boy*
Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>
> Well, Snits has been pretty mouthy here lately about *MY* websites, so
> I thought it might be kinda fun to point out *HER* website (singular)
> for everyone:
> http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/
That's my homepage, yes.
> ...woah. I mean...holy shit.
Yes, I've neglected the poor thing for years. So what?
> It looks like some long lost remnant of
> HTML v1 coding, slopped together without any sense of style, color
> theory, or usability. Hell the bitch is so the fuck out of date she's
> still relying on TABLES for CONTENT LAYOUT! o_O
OK, *that* is an insult! I do not rely on tables for layout! (In fact, I
don't have much "layout", I have content, with a little html as "glue"
to make it presentable on the web.) I did once, and then I learned
better and ripped out that shit, but that was over ten years ago. I
haven't changed much since then (and no, I do not consider that to be a
Bad Thing).
> I mean...holy shit. Even the most pathetic of amateur class college
> flunkies can figure out division layers, hell I even wrote a basic FAQ
> for how to use them:
> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.2600/msg/dc582b7a21b9f0e1
Why would I need these layers? What would they add? Most of what I have
is ascii art and a simple <pre> tag handles that just fine.
> ...and trust me, it doesn't *GET* any more basic than *THAT*. *rolls
> eyes*
Why would I want anything other than extremely basic? I don't have any
content that isn't extremely basic.
(Clue: "extremely basic" is not a synonym for "bad")
> This doofy little retard is so the fuck out dated she still has a BLUE
> RIBBON on her site (as a poorly compressed GIF I might add),
I have plenty of cheesy clipart on my personal homepage, yes. Live with
it!
> despite
> the fact that the blue ribbon campaign essentially went dead
> like...over a DECADE ago.
Yes. Fortunately, the message behind it did not die along with it.
> Hell, this dipshit is *SO* out of date
> she's still using CLIP ART on her site! Single color clip art at
> that.
I also post to Usenet (talk about outdated!). With an ancient news
reader. :-)
> Here, wait, this is even funnier, check out what her server directory
> structure looks like:
> http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/pics/ascii/chat/archive/
>
> Oh and uh, do note the fact that she's still working on the folder for
> TWO THOUSAND.
Yes, that is bad. I might get around to that some day. Or Not. Right now
I'll just continue to ignore it for a while longer.
*shrug*
> Yup, that's right, Veronica Sucks-Cock Karlsson is
> essentially trapped back the fuck in the year 2000. Perhaps it's some
> strange temporal anomaly having to do with Y2K? Perhaps some alien
> technology was implanted up her fat ugly ass and when the year 2K came
> along her anal probe just wasn't Y2K compliant. *nods* That's really
> the only plausible explanation I can think of for just how incredibly
> out of date she is.
>
> ...on the other hand though I think she's from some third world
> country over in Europe that everyone else forgot about, so maybe
> they're just not very advanced...or their backwards government
> restricts their computer learning to everything dated BEFORE 1997. LOL
Oh, yeah: your homepage sucks!
--
__ __ _____ _____ ______ __ _ _ _____ __
||| \ \ ) )/ / \|| | \ \ / / \ \ | \ | || | / / \| ) \
||.. \ \/ /| |_/| | |_/ /| | | || \ | || || | / \
|.PP. \ / | | \| | | \ \| | | || |\_\| || || | / /\ \
_\/___ \_( \_\__/||_| \_\\_\__/_/ |_| |_||_| \_\__/|(_( \_\
|_______ Troll Spokeswoman _____ http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/ ___|
Bob Larter
I doubt it - any shrink would advise their patients to quit working there.
Bob Larter
Not that that would take much, your site is pretty crap, & has no
content to speak of.
> when her
> own work is so far below the level of absolute crap,
And yet she effortlessly manages to make her site far more entertaining
than your site, DiaperBoi.
Veronica Karlsson
Oh, look, another page I haven't looked at in years. Thank you for
reminding me of its existance. I really should do something about it.
:-)
> LOL, the doofy retard is actually trying to ~explain~ the way her site
> works to a SPAM BOT!
>
> *Hatter nearly dies laughing*
>
> Oh good Christ...LOL...ahahahahahaha...*sigh*...oh man that's just
> hilarious. ^__^
>
> It's too bad she's not intelligent enough to prevent spam bots from
> sending her spam through her site. She is rather fortunate though
> that no one has taken the bother to teach her an important lesson in
> coding, because quite frankly it wouldn't take me more than 4 minutes
> to code a web bot capable of essentially crashing her entire server in
> a matter of minutes via her little online form there.
>
> I think this is the best part though:
>
Yes, it's funny. That's why it's there.
--
Bob Larter
> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>
>>
>> Awww, are you all angry and upset? Tsch, tsch, tsch, the sloppy bitch
>> should have kept her idiot mouth shut if she didn't want to play.
>> Apparently she missed the meeting regarding the whole, "Don't do to
>> others what you wouldn't want done to yourself...and worse."
>>
>> The fact that she's trying to belittle and attack *MY* work when her
>> own work is so far below the level of absolute crap, is pretty much an
>> instant invitation to getting verbally fucked up the ass in every
>> other direction. She has no one to blame but herself and she
>> certainly doesn't need any halfwitted retards liak yourself trying to
>> be her knight in shining idiocy.
>
> I'm starting to get concerned about you. All this rage is unhealthy.
He's on another of his meth binges.
Bob Larter
Great rant, DiaperBoi. Nice work, Emo. ;^)
Bob Larter
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:22:29 -0600, Emo Haircut
> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>
>>> Awww, are you all angry and upset? Tsch, tsch, tsch, the sloppy bitch
>>> should have kept her idiot mouth shut if she didn't want to play.
>>> Apparently she missed the meeting regarding the whole, "Don't do to
>>> others what you wouldn't want done to yourself...and worse."
>>>
>>> The fact that she's trying to belittle and attack *MY* work when her
>>> own work is so far below the level of absolute crap, is pretty much an
>>> instant invitation to getting verbally fucked up the ass in every
>>> other direction. She has no one to blame but herself and she
>>> certainly doesn't need any halfwitted retards liak yourself trying to
>>> be her knight in shining idiocy.
>> I'm starting to get concerned about you. All this rage is unhealthy.
>
> ...you really are a one-trick lame artist, aren't you? I mean, is
> that *REALLY* the only comeback you've got?
>
> Tsch, tsch, tsch...you best start producing better, child...lest you
> want one of my bots to babysit you.
You don't have a bot, DiaperBoi. All you have is cut 'n paste.
Bob Larter
> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:22:29 -0600, Emo Haircut
>> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>
>>>> Awww, are you all angry and upset? Tsch, tsch, tsch, the sloppy bitch
>>>> should have kept her idiot mouth shut if she didn't want to play.
>>>> Apparently she missed the meeting regarding the whole, "Don't do to
>>>> others what you wouldn't want done to yourself...and worse."
>>>>
>>>> The fact that she's trying to belittle and attack *MY* work when her
>>>> own work is so far below the level of absolute crap, is pretty much an
>>>> instant invitation to getting verbally fucked up the ass in every
>>>> other direction. She has no one to blame but herself and she
>>>> certainly doesn't need any halfwitted retards liak yourself trying to
>>>> be her knight in shining idiocy.
>>> I'm starting to get concerned about you. All this rage is unhealthy.
>>
>> ...you really are a one-trick lame artist, aren't you? I mean, is
>> that *REALLY* the only comeback you've got?
>>
>> Tsch, tsch, tsch...you best start producing better, child...lest you
>> want one of my bots to babysit you.
DiaperBoi thinks that cut 'n pasting the same lame response to a few
dozen posts is running a bot. He doesn't actually know how to program.
> Christ, you're boring enough to be a bot. You mean it could be worse?
It's actually better, because you can just skip through his cut 'n paste
'bot' posts, without having to wade through pages of butthurt kook-screed.
Bob Larter
It's fucking hilarious that you keep on boasting about having an MHM.
One day, I'm going to let you in on a little secret.
Bob Larter
You're doing well, but you still haven't beaten my record, which was
when I set DiaperBoi off on an all night posting binge with a single two
line post.
Bob Larter
Do you think you could put your "bot" online? - It'd be way more
interesting to read than this drivel.
Bob Larter
> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>
>>>>>>> Emo: 1 line of text, 14 words.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oedipus: Multi-paragraph kookscreed of epic dimensions.
>
>>>>>>> Emo <---- Troll troller.
>
>>>>> Emo: 3 lines of text, 17 words.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oedipus: On and on and on......
>>>>>
>>>>> Emo <---- Teh troller of trolls
>
>>> Emo <---- gets trolls to dance
>>
>> Uh huh, sorry kiddo, but getting people to smack you around like a
>> sloppy bitch isn't a form of trolling so much as it's, well, just
>> getting smacked around like a sloppy bitch.
>
> Hehe, 2 words:
You're getting good at this, Emo. ;^)
Onideus Mad Hatter
wrote:
>H<WHACK>
Either that or he just suddenly got *REAL* jealous that I was giving
somebody else a whole bunch of my attention whilst he hasn't gotten
any from me in weeks (other than bot posts anyway). It must really
suck...going through Hatter withdrawal. Oh well, I can't un-make a
Hatter Addict. *shrugs*
Onideus Mad Hatter
wrote:
>Emo Haircut wrote:
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 20:22:29 -0600, Emo Haircut
>>> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Awww, are you all angry and upset? Tsch, tsch, tsch, the sloppy bitch
>>>>> should have kept her idiot mouth shut if she didn't want to play.
>>>>> Apparently she missed the meeting regarding the whole, "Don't do to
>>>>> others what you wouldn't want done to yourself...and worse."
>>>>>
>>>>> The fact that she's trying to belittle and attack *MY* work when her
>>>>> own work is so far below the level of absolute crap, is pretty much an
>>>>> instant invitation to getting verbally fucked up the ass in every
>>>>> other direction. She has no one to blame but herself and she
>>>>> certainly doesn't need any halfwitted retards liak yourself trying to
>>>>> be her knight in shining idiocy.
>>>> I'm starting to get concerned about you. All this rage is unhealthy.
>>>
>>> ...you really are a one-trick lame artist, aren't you? I mean, is
>>> that *REALLY* the only comeback you've got?
>>>
>>> Tsch, tsch, tsch...you best start producing better, child...lest you
>>> want one of my bots to babysit you.
>
>Di<WHACK>
Get the fuck off my leg, Hatter Addict, yer startin to stain.
Onideus Mad Hatter
Onideus Mad Hatter
wrote:
>Emo Haircut wrote:
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> Emo: 1 line of text, 14 words.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Oedipus: Multi-paragraph kookscreed of epic dimensions.
>>
>>>>>>>> Emo <---- Troll troller.
>>
>>>>>> Emo: 3 lines of text, 17 words.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oedipus: On and on and on......
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Emo <---- Teh troller of trolls
>>
>>>> Emo <---- gets trolls to dance
>>>
>>> Uh huh, sorry kiddo, but getting people to smack you around like a
>>> sloppy bitch isn't a form of trolling so much as it's, well, just
>>> getting smacked around like a sloppy bitch.
>>
>> Hehe, 2 words:
>
>Yo<WHACK>
Get the fuck off my leg, Hatter Addict, yer startin to stain.
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
Onideus Mad Hatter
Onideus Mad Hatter
Onideus Mad Hatter
Onideus Mad Hatter
Onideus Mad Hatter
Onideus Mad Hatter
Onideus Mad Hatter
<veronica...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Oh, look! A long sub-thread with my name on it!
>
>*beams*
Hatter Addicts do love it when I give them some attention. It's nice
to see you're so open about how much you *LOVE* getting it from me.
The feeling I'm afraid is pretty single sided though, as the only
thing I can manage to feel when seeing and reading any of your posts
is, well...pity...mixed with mostly apathy and stolid cynicism.
Your boiler-plate style of nebbish, puerile animadversion most often
amounts to little more than vapid insipidity at its best.
>But no context kept from previous discussion...
What context? You said my website(s) "sucked" (your malformed cock
apparently). Your stuporous paroxysm is senseless verbiage more than
context and hardly worth even mentioning.
>Is somebody trying to
>change the subject? Why? Could it be because his homepage (singular)
>sucks?
This coming from the little girl crying her eyes out cause dat mean
'ol Mad Hatter all went and decided to redirect her little tantrum
back onto her own sites...of course, unlike you, child, I've much moar
than the innocuous irascibility that you derive your halfwitted verbal
"attacks" from. And one can see just how effective my critiques are,
what with how you took the whole site down shortly after reading my
post. LOL You really are *THAT* ashamed of your own work, aren't
you? ^__^
>Could it be be cause he has no good answer to the question "Why
>should I give you meaningful critique about your homepage?"
Well it would certainly take less effort than all the desultory tail
chasing assiduity that you've shown so far...not that you have much
choice in the matter, what with how you're far too nebbish to even
begin to try and formulate an ardorous verbal conflagration of
critical condemnation. Not to mention your incredible poverty of
intellect, a literal vacancy of mind as you fumble about with such
reaching, infantile attempts at painting misnomers onto other people's
work, all the while your own skills clearly defining you as a
perpetual poser class dipshit, all your websites looking like vomit
stained hangovers from the Clinton administration.
>*pokes Mad Boy*
*Hatter sets you ablaze.*
...you make a lovely fire. ^__^
>That's my homepage, yes.
Correction, *WAS* your homepage, it appears you've taken it down out
of shame (unsurprisingly).
>> ...woah. I mean...holy shit.
>Yes, I've neglected the poor thing for years. So what?
Is your stupidity so brobdingnagian that you honestly need me to
explain this to you?
LOL, this moony dipshit apparently thinks that a couple high school
physics classes make her a reliable source to "critique" the works of
Einstein. Sorry, not so much "critiquing" as 2nd grade level name
calling in your particular case, huh Spergs?
>> It looks like some long lost remnant of
>> HTML v1 coding, slopped together without any sense of style, color
>> theory, or usability. Hell the bitch is so the fuck out of date she's
>> still relying on TABLES for CONTENT LAYOUT! o_O
>OK, *that* is an insult! I do not rely on tables for layout! (In fact, I
>don't have much "layout", I have content, with a little html as "glue"
>to make it presentable on the web.) I did once, and then I learned
>better and ripped out that shit, but that was over ten years ago. I
>haven't changed much since then (and no, I do not consider that to be a
>Bad Thing).
Your "glue" looks like it was spaghetti bitched out of Netscape
Composer. Good thing you took down that piece of shit. *checks* Oh
look, you brought it back up with "improved" coding. Let's take a
look!
: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
: <head>
:
: <TITLE>Veronica Karlsson's Homepage</TITLE>
: <META name="description" content="An ascii art chat room,
: info about ascii art, among other things, can be
: found on this site.">
: <META name="keywords" content="ascii art, ascii pictures, ascii images,
: typewriter art, Tove Veronica Karlsson, ascii art chat, chat rooms,
: veronica karlssons hemsida">
: <base target="_top">
: <link rel="shortcut icon" href="/~vk/favicon.ico" />
: <link rel="icon" type="image/x-icon" href="/~vk/favicon.ico" />
:
: <LINK REL="StyleSheet" href="/~vk/ram/1style.css" type="text/css" MEDIA="screen">
: </HEAD>
: <BODY>
: <center>
:
: <i>( v...@ludd.luth.se http://www.ludd.luth.se/users/vk/ )</i><br>
:
: <h1><img src="pics/misc/veronica.gif" alt="Veronica" width=335 height=60>
: <img src="pics/misc/karlssons.gif" alt="Karlsson's" width=394 height=60>
: <img src="pics/misc/homepage.gif" alt="Homepage" width=368 height=60></h1>
:
:
: <P><!-- #include virtual="message.html" -->
:
:
: <div class=drh align=center><hr width="80%" size=2 noshade></div>
:
: <pre>
:
: </pre>
:
: <table cellpadding=15 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr><td align="center">
: <img src="me/me.gif" border=0 WIDTH=93 HEIGHT=137 alt="">
:
: </td><td>
: <h1>Who is Veronica?<br></H1>
: <b><big>I am the best!<br> no question about that,<br>
: so be very very happy,<BR> that I let you visit my homepage!</big></b>
: </td></tr></table>
:
: <pre>
:
: </pre>
:
: <p><big>
: [<A HREF="docs/docs.shtml">misc.</a>]
: [<A HREF="pics/ascii/ascii.shtml">ascii art</a>]
: [<A HREF="pics/ascii/chat/index.shtml">chat</a>]
: [<A HREF="docs/links/links.shtml">links</a>]
: [<A HREF="docs/news.shtml">news</a>]
: </big>
:
: <div class=drh align=center><hr width="80%" size=2 noshade></div>
:
: <P><IMG SRC="pics/misc/blue_ribbon.gif" width=42 height=69 alt="">
: <a href="me/"><img src="pics/misc/catl.gif" width=50 height=50 alt="" border=0 align=left vspace=10></a>
: <img src="pics/misc/cat.gif" width=50 height=50 alt="" border=0 align=right vspace=10>
: <P><a href="mailto:vk@ludd.luth.se">vk@ludd.luth.se</a><br>
:
:
: </CENTER>
: </BODY>
Tsch, tsch, tsch...okay kitten, first thing here, when you start
MIXING tags in ALL CAPS and tags in lower case...yeah that's pretty
much a dead give away that you're spaghetti bitching your code out of
various sites, basically ripping off parts from other people's sites
and then pasting them into your sloppy ass mess because you can't
actually code on your own.
Second, you're *STILL* using tables for content layout:
: <table cellpadding=15 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr><td align="center">
: <img src="me/me.gif" border=0 WIDTH=93 HEIGHT=137 alt="">
:
: </td><td>
: <h1>Who is Veronica?<br></H1>
: <b><big>I am the best!<br> no question about that,<br>
: so be very very happy,<BR> that I let you visit my homepage!</big></b>
: </td></tr></table>
What the fuck is that shit? Are division layers (or just straight
CSS) *REALLY* that complicated for you?
And once again I point out all the MASSIVE mixing of tag styles, which
clearly indicate that you were copying and pasting from dozens of
different sources no doubt.
This right here though:
: <!-- #include virtual="message.html" -->
That's my *FAVORITE* part of your website. Why? Because it's a
cookie cutter imprint, likely from MS FrontPage or some other training
pants web page making piece of shit, specifically designed for
complete amateurs who haven't clue fucking one as to what HTML even
is. LOL
I could go on of course, I can think of more than a dozen different
things just within your code alone that I could easily rip apart, but
I think I've got enough up so far...I don't wanna drown my new toy too
quickly. ^__^
The pleasurable satisfaction of ripping apart some poser class dipshit
with high levels of unwarranted self importance, like yourself, with
meaningful critiques, hard facts and infallible arguments is like pure
ecstasy to someone of my level. And once again, you're so far the
fuck outta yer league you can't even come up with a *SINGLE* critique
of my perfectionistic web work.
>> I mean...holy shit. Even the most pathetic of amateur class college
>> flunkies can figure out division layers, hell I even wrote a basic FAQ
>> for how to use them:
>> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.2600/msg/dc582b7a21b9f0e1
>Why would I need these layers? What would they add? Most of what I have
>is ascii art and a simple <pre> tag handles that just fine.
You don't have to use layers, you could just use CSS directly and the
obvious reason (to anyone who actually knows how to code HTML) is that
you get absolute, independent, precision alignment. Where as with
your tables every part within the table is all dependant upon all the
other parts for their imprecise alignment. Take out even a single
part (or add one) and likely your whole table will fall all apart and
out of the alignment that you wanted.
>> ...and trust me, it doesn't *GET* any more basic than *THAT*. *rolls
>> eyes*
>Why would I want anything other than extremely basic? I don't have any
>content that isn't extremely basic.
>
>(Clue: "extremely basic" is not a synonym for "bad")
That depends on the usage, Kiddo. If you need an "extremely basic",
training pants style guide to building websites with HTML, which isn't
even a real programming language...yeah...yer likely not ever gonna
get above the level of poser class amateur when it comes to making
websites.
That's not necessarily a bad thing though, I mean it's not as if
you're going to be making any professional level websites or anything,
however you really ought to watch your big fat ugly mouth, before you
start mawing off about shit you know nothing about. Your "ability" to
rip off HTML from other people whilst forcibly RAPING it up the ass
does *NOT* in *ANY* way make you qualified to critique a website...or
in your case throw around playground level lames whilst stomping up
and down in indignant frustration.
>> This doofy little retard is so the fuck out dated she still has a BLUE
>> RIBBON on her site (as a poorly compressed GIF I might add),
>I have plenty of cheesy clipart on my personal homepage, yes. Live with
>it!
Your cheesy clipart looks like shit. It does remind me of something
pretty funny though. *looks it up* Ahhh, here it is, the reasons why
Veronica Karlsson is like clipart:
She takes up space in the absence of substance.
She's poorly drawn and badly colored.
There hasn't been a real use for her since Windows 3.11.
She's way too simple.
She sticks out like a sore thumb.
She lacks style.
She's 2D.
She only appeals to the easily impressed.
Her only purpose is to take up space.
She's only worth money in large groups.
Inexpensive, colorful, but ultimately unfulfilling.
She's a placeholder for something better.
In fact, she *IS* the stick man scratching his head in confusion.
Most people cringe when they see her.
>> despite
>> the fact that the blue ribbon campaign essentially went dead
>> like...over a DECADE ago.
>Yes. Fortunately, the message behind it did not die along with it.
Yeah, actually it pretty much has. Basically the blue ribbon campaign
died out when it was suddenly pointed out that the campaign
essentially sought to TAKE AWAY the free speech of those who owned
their own servers. If you own your own server you have *ALL* the free
speech you like, but if you're on SOMEONE ELSE'S server...no, that's
THEIR free speech, not yours, you're just a guest.
>> Hell, this dipshit is *SO* out of date
>> she's still using CLIP ART on her site! Single color clip art at
>> that.
>I also post to Usenet (talk about outdated!). With an ancient news
>reader. :-)
The difference of course being that Usenet still serves a viable
purpose...where as clipart *NEVER* really served any purpose at
all...other than to take up space...senseless filler. Of course the
truly sad thing is that you're not even using MODERN clip art. I
mean, honestly, how the fuck long would it take your dumbass to run a
Google image search to get a newer, better looking graphic? It's like
you're purposefully trying to watch HDTV on some 50 year old black and
white 13 inch television...it's *THAT* stupid.
>> Here, wait, this is even funnier, check out what her server directory
>> structure looks like:
>> http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/pics/ascii/chat/archive/
>>
>> Oh and uh, do note the fact that she's still working on the folder for
>> TWO THOUSAND.
>Yes, that is bad. I might get around to that some day. Or Not. Right now
>I'll just continue to ignore it for a while longer.
>
>*shrug*
I don't think you're ever going to update it actually. Unless you
come under the delusion that somebody actually gives a shit about your
crappy site. They don't, btw, mostly because there are dozens of
sites already that are devoted to your site's primary subject (ASCII
art), most of which have thousands of examples, great organization,
color ASCII art, animated ASCII art, 3D ASCII art and even a variety
of programs to turn your pictures and even video into ASCII art.
At this point I'm not really sure you can call it an "art" so much,
what with how nobody does ASCII art by hand anymore, it's all done via
programs that generates the "art" from any source material you like.
>> Yup, that's right, Veronica Sucks-Cock Karlsson is
>> essentially trapped back the fuck in the year 2000. Perhaps it's some
>> strange temporal anomaly having to do with Y2K? Perhaps some alien
>> technology was implanted up her fat ugly ass and when the year 2K came
>> along her anal probe just wasn't Y2K compliant. *nods* That's really
>> the only plausible explanation I can think of for just how incredibly
>> out of date she is.
>>
>> ...on the other hand though I think she's from some third world
>> country over in Europe that everyone else forgot about, so maybe
>> they're just not very advanced...or their backwards government
>> restricts their computer learning to everything dated BEFORE 1997. LOL
>Oh, yeah: your homepage sucks!
Yeah it sucks yer mama's titties alright. Wanna buy some pictures?
%
Veronica Karlsson
> Veronica Karlsson wrote:
>
> >Oh, look! A long sub-thread with my name on it!
> >
> >*beams*
>
> Hatter Addicts do love it when I give them some attention. It's nice
> to see you're so open about how much you *LOVE* getting it from me.
> The feeling I'm afraid is pretty single sided though, as the only
> thing I can manage to feel when seeing and reading any of your posts
> is, well...pity...mixed with mostly apathy and stolid cynicism.
>
> Your boiler-plate style of nebbish, puerile animadversion most often
> amounts to little more than vapid insipidity at its best.
>
> >But no context kept from previous discussion...
>
> What context? You said my website(s) "sucked" (your malformed cock
> apparently). Your stuporous paroxysm is senseless verbiage more than
> context and hardly worth even mentioning.
>
> >Is somebody trying to
> >change the subject? Why? Could it be because his homepage (singular)
> >sucks?
>
> This coming from the little girl crying her eyes out cause dat mean
> 'ol Mad Hatter all went and decided to redirect her little tantrum
> back onto her own sites...
You mean, change focus away from what was being discussed: your
homepage.
> of course, unlike you, child, I've much moar
> than the innocuous irascibility that you derive your halfwitted verbal
> "attacks" from. And one can see just how effective my critiques are,
> what with how you took the whole site down shortly after reading my
> post. LOL You really are *THAT* ashamed of your own work, aren't
> you? ^__^
>
Ludd has been down all day, including all the homepages there, not just
mine.
> >Could it be be cause he has no good answer to the question "Why
> >should I give you meaningful critique about your homepage?"
>
> Well it would certainly take less effort than all the desultory tail
> chasing assiduity that you've shown so far...not that you have much
> choice in the matter, what with how you're far too nebbish to even
> begin to try and formulate an ardorous verbal conflagration of
> critical condemnation. Not to mention your incredible poverty of
> intellect, a literal vacancy of mind as you fumble about with such
> reaching, infantile attempts at painting misnomers onto other people's
> work, all the while your own skills clearly defining you as a
> perpetual poser class dipshit, all your websites looking like vomit
> stained hangovers from the Clinton administration.
*still not feeling motivated to give meaningful critique about Mad Boy's
homepage*
> >*pokes Mad Boy*
>
> *Hatter sets you ablaze.*
>
> ...you make a lovely fire. ^__^
>
> >That's my homepage, yes.
>
> Correction, *WAS* your homepage, it appears you've taken it down out
> of shame (unsurprisingly).
>
> >> ...woah. I mean...holy shit.
>
> >Yes, I've neglected the poor thing for years. So what?
>
> Is your stupidity so brobdingnagian that you honestly need me to
> explain this to you?
>
> LOL, this moony dipshit apparently thinks that a couple high school
> physics classes make her a reliable source to "critique" the works of
> Einstein. Sorry, not so much "critiquing" as 2nd grade level name
> calling in your particular case, huh Spergs?
*fails to see similarity between Mad Boy and Einstein*
> >> It looks like some long lost remnant of
> >> HTML v1 coding, slopped together without any sense of style, color
> >> theory, or usability. Hell the bitch is so the fuck out of date she's
> >> still relying on TABLES for CONTENT LAYOUT! o_O
>
> >OK, *that* is an insult! I do not rely on tables for layout! (In fact, I
> >don't have much "layout", I have content, with a little html as "glue"
> >to make it presentable on the web.) I did once, and then I learned
> >better and ripped out that shit, but that was over ten years ago. I
> >haven't changed much since then (and no, I do not consider that to be a
> >Bad Thing).
>
> Your "glue" looks like it was spaghetti bitched out of Netscape
> Composer. Good thing you took down that piece of shit. *checks* Oh
> look, you brought it back up with "improved" coding. Let's take a
> look!
>
Huh?
sister~/www/htdocs>ls -l index.shtml
-rw-r--r-- 1 vk ludduser 2104 Feb 3 17:19 index.shtml
sister~/www/htdocs>
No, haven't done anything to that file today.
Or maybe my style changed as I made changes over the last thirteen
years?
> Second, you're *STILL* using tables for content layout:
>
> : <table cellpadding=15 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr><td align="center">
> : <img src="me/me.gif" border=0 WIDTH=93 HEIGHT=137 alt="">
> :
> : </td><td>
> : <h1>Who is Veronica?<br></H1>
> : <b><big>I am the best!<br> no question about that,<br>
> : so be very very happy,<BR> that I let you visit my homepage!</big></b>
> : </td></tr></table>
>
Oh, you are right, so I am! :-D
> What the fuck is that shit? Are division layers (or just straight
> CSS) *REALLY* that complicated for you?
>
> And once again I point out all the MASSIVE mixing of tag styles, which
> clearly indicate that you were copying and pasting from dozens of
> different sources no doubt.
>
> This right here though:
> : <!-- #include virtual="message.html" -->
>
> That's my *FAVORITE* part of your website. Why? Because it's a
> cookie cutter imprint, likely from MS FrontPage or some other training
No, that line is actually handwritten by me. If I remove one space it
ceases to be an html comment and instead includes another file with a
message. Instead of re-learning how to do includes every time I want a
message there I just remove that space... Not elegant, but practical.
:-D
> pants web page making piece of shit, specifically designed for
> complete amateurs who haven't clue fucking one as to what HTML even
> is. LOL
>
> I could go on of course, I can think of more than a dozen different
> things just within your code alone that I could easily rip apart,
Me too. I don't rip up everything I ever made every time I learn
something new. I don't necessarily throw it away either.
> but
> I think I've got enough up so far...I don't wanna drown my new toy too
> quickly. ^__^
>
> The pleasurable satisfaction of ripping apart some poser class dipshit
> with high levels of unwarranted self importance, like yourself, with
> meaningful critiques,
The only "meaningful critique" you've come up with so far is that I'm a
little bit behind in my updating of stuff. I already knew that.
> hard facts and infallible arguments is like pure
> ecstasy to someone of my level. And once again, you're so far the
> fuck outta yer league you can't even come up with a *SINGLE* critique
> of my perfectionistic web work.
Sure I can: it sucks.
> >> I mean...holy shit. Even the most pathetic of amateur class college
> >> flunkies can figure out division layers, hell I even wrote a basic FAQ
> >> for how to use them:
> >> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.2600/msg/dc582b7a21b9f0e1
>
> >Why would I need these layers? What would they add? Most of what I have
> >is ascii art and a simple <pre> tag handles that just fine.
>
> You don't have to use layers, you could just use CSS directly and the
> obvious reason (to anyone who actually knows how to code HTML) is that
> you get absolute, independent, precision alignment. Where as with
> your tables every part within the table is all dependant upon all the
> other parts for their imprecise alignment.
OK... well... my opinion is that "flexible" is better than "precise", on
web pages.
> Take out even a single
> part (or add one) and likely your whole table will fall all apart and
> out of the alignment that you wanted.
>
> >> ...and trust me, it doesn't *GET* any more basic than *THAT*. *rolls
> >> eyes*
>
> >Why would I want anything other than extremely basic? I don't have any
> >content that isn't extremely basic.
> >
> >(Clue: "extremely basic" is not a synonym for "bad")
>
> That depends on the usage, Kiddo. If you need an "extremely basic",
> training pants style guide to building websites with HTML, which isn't
> even a real programming language...yeah...yer likely not ever gonna
> get above the level of poser class amateur when it comes to making
> websites.
Maybe I'm just interested in using my personal homepage to communicate
with people...
> That's not necessarily a bad thing though, I mean it's not as if
> you're going to be making any professional level websites or anything,
> however you really ought to watch your big fat ugly mouth, before you
> start mawing off about shit you know nothing about. Your "ability" to
> rip off HTML from other people whilst forcibly RAPING it up the ass
> does *NOT* in *ANY* way make you qualified to critique a website...or
> in your case throw around playground level lames whilst stomping up
> and down in indignant frustration.
I do know this much: your homepage sucks.
> >> This doofy little retard is so the fuck out dated she still has a BLUE
> >> RIBBON on her site (as a poorly compressed GIF I might add),
>
> >I have plenty of cheesy clipart on my personal homepage, yes. Live with
> >it!
>
> Your cheesy clipart looks like shit. It does remind me of something
> pretty funny though. *looks it up* Ahhh, here it is, the reasons why
> Veronica Karlsson is like clipart:
>
> She takes up space in the absence of substance.
> She's poorly drawn and badly colored.
> There hasn't been a real use for her since Windows 3.11.
> She's way too simple.
> She sticks out like a sore thumb.
> She lacks style.
> She's 2D.
> She only appeals to the easily impressed.
> Her only purpose is to take up space.
> She's only worth money in large groups.
> Inexpensive, colorful, but ultimately unfulfilling.
> She's a placeholder for something better.
> In fact, she *IS* the stick man scratching his head in confusion.
> Most people cringe when they see her.
>
Is this the output of some kind of "funny site"? What's the URL?
> >> despite
> >> the fact that the blue ribbon campaign essentially went dead
> >> like...over a DECADE ago.
>
> >Yes. Fortunately, the message behind it did not die along with it.
>
> Yeah, actually it pretty much has. Basically the blue ribbon campaign
> died out when it was suddenly pointed out that the campaign
> essentially sought to TAKE AWAY the free speech of those who owned
> their own servers. If you own your own server you have *ALL* the free
> speech you like, but if you're on SOMEONE ELSE'S server...no, that's
> THEIR free speech, not yours, you're just a guest.
>
> >> Hell, this dipshit is *SO* out of date
> >> she's still using CLIP ART on her site! Single color clip art at
> >> that.
>
> >I also post to Usenet (talk about outdated!). With an ancient news
> >reader. :-)
>
> The difference of course being that Usenet still serves a viable
> purpose...where as clipart *NEVER* really served any purpose at
> all...other than to take up space...senseless filler. Of course the
> truly sad thing is that you're not even using MODERN clip art. I
> mean, honestly, how the fuck long would it take your dumbass to run a
> Google image search to get a newer, better looking graphic? It's like
> you're purposefully trying to watch HDTV on some 50 year old black and
> white 13 inch television...it's *THAT* stupid.
?
> >> Here, wait, this is even funnier, check out what her server directory
> >> structure looks like:
> >> http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/pics/ascii/chat/archive/
> >>
> >> Oh and uh, do note the fact that she's still working on the folder for
> >> TWO THOUSAND.
>
> >Yes, that is bad. I might get around to that some day. Or Not. Right now
> >I'll just continue to ignore it for a while longer.
> >
> >*shrug*
>
> I don't think you're ever going to update it actually.
That is quite possible.
> Unless you
> come under the delusion that somebody actually gives a shit about your
> crappy site. They don't, btw, mostly because there are dozens of
> sites already that are devoted to your site's primary subject (ASCII
> art), most of which have thousands of examples, great organization,
> color ASCII art, animated ASCII art, 3D ASCII art and even a variety
> of programs to turn your pictures and even video into ASCII art.
As a collector of ascii art I know that I really like to see an artist's
own homepage, because there you are likely to see everything that person
made, including the stuff that didn't appeal to other collectors.
> At this point I'm not really sure you can call it an "art" so much,
> what with how nobody does ASCII art by hand anymore, it's all done via
> programs that generates the "art" from any source material you like.
>
> >> Yup, that's right, Veronica Sucks-Cock Karlsson is
> >> essentially trapped back the fuck in the year 2000. Perhaps it's some
> >> strange temporal anomaly having to do with Y2K? Perhaps some alien
> >> technology was implanted up her fat ugly ass and when the year 2K came
> >> along her anal probe just wasn't Y2K compliant. *nods* That's really
> >> the only plausible explanation I can think of for just how incredibly
> >> out of date she is.
> >>
> >> ...on the other hand though I think she's from some third world
> >> country over in Europe that everyone else forgot about, so maybe
> >> they're just not very advanced...or their backwards government
> >> restricts their computer learning to everything dated BEFORE 1997. LOL
>
> >Oh, yeah: your homepage sucks!
>
> Yeah it sucks yer mama's titties alright. Wanna buy some pictures?
Oh, yeah: your homepage sucks!
ah
> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> I thought it might be kinda fun to point out *HER* website (singular)
>> for everyone:
>> http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/
>>
>> HTML v1 coding, slopped together without any sense of style, color
>> theory, or usability. Hell the bitch is so the fuck out of date she's
>> still relying on TABLES for CONTENT LAYOUT! o_O
>
> site, DiaperBoi.
ROLF!
--
ah
ah
ah
>>> I thought it might be kinda fun to point out *HER* website (singular)
>>> for everyone:
>>> http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/
>>>
>>> HTML v1 coding, slopped together without any sense of style, color
>>> theory, or usability. Hell the bitch is so the fuck out of date she's
>>> still relying on TABLES for CONTENT LAYOUT! o_O
>>>
>>> flunkies can figure out division layers, hell I even wrote a basic FAQ
>>> for how to use them:
>>> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.2600/msg/dc582b7a21b9f0e1
>>>
>>> eyes*
>>>
>>> the fact that the blue ribbon campaign essentially went dead
>>> she's still using CLIP ART on her site! Single color clip art at
>>> that.
>>>
>>> structure looks like:
>>> http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/pics/ascii/chat/archive/
>>>
>>> Oh and uh, do note the fact that she's still working on the folder for
>>> essentially trapped back the fuck in the year 2000. Perhaps it's some
>>> strange temporal anomaly having to do with Y2K? Perhaps some alien
>>> technology was implanted up her fat ugly ass and when the year 2K came
>>> along her anal probe just wasn't Y2K compliant. *nods* That's really
>>> the only plausible explanation I can think of for just how incredibly
>>> out of date she is.
>>>
>>> ...on the other hand though I think she's from some third world
>>> country over in Europe that everyone else forgot about, so maybe
>>> they're just not very advanced...or their backwards government
>>> restricts their computer learning to everything dated BEFORE 1997. LOL
>>
>
> Awww, are you all angry and upset? Tsch, tsch, tsch, the sloppy bitch
> should have kept her idiot mouth shut if she didn't want to play.
> Apparently she missed the meeting regarding the whole, "Don't do to
> others what you wouldn't want done to yourself...and worse."
>
> The fact that she's trying to belittle and attack *MY* work when her
> own work is so far below the level of absolute crap, is pretty much an
> instant invitation to getting verbally fucked up the ass in every
> other direction. She has no one to blame but herself and she
> certainly doesn't need any halfwitted retards liak yourself trying to
> be her knight in shining idiocy.
You really do need to get out of the basement, and breathe some oxygen, and
stuff, Dude.
--
ah
Bob Larter
You know someone's delusional when they boast about their l337
web-design skills, but actually work at WalMart.
Onideus Mad Hatter
>Bob Larter wrote:
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> Well, Snits has been pretty mouthy here lately about *MY* websites, so
>>> I thought it might be kinda fun to point out *HER* website (singular)
>>> for everyone:
>>> http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/
>>>
>>> ...woah. I mean...holy shit. It looks like some long lost remnant of
>>> HTML v1 coding, slopped together without any sense of style, color
>>> theory, or usability. Hell the bitch is so the fuck out of date she's
>>> still relying on TABLES for CONTENT LAYOUT! o_O
>>
>> And yet it's a hell of a lot more entertaining than anything on your
>> site, DiaperBoi.
>
>ROLF!
...that, really wasn't funny...at all. And given how much I
appreciate entertaining flames that's saying quite a lot.
I mean did you ~honestly~ read that and suddenly erupt into a giggling
fit of laughter...cause...WOW! Boy that sure does say a lot about
*YOU*, now doesn't it? I mean maybe you're just desperate for some
Hatter haet material, I dunno, but seriously, is that really all the
better you could find?
Onideus Mad Hatter
>Yo<COCK SLAP>
I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of how incredibly awesome I
am. ^__^
Emo Haircut
> ah wrote:
>>
>> You really do need to get out of the basement, and breathe some
>> oxygen, and
>> stuff, Dude.
>
> You know someone's delusional when they boast about their l337
> web-design skills, but actually work at WalMart.
Wal Mart is an immense company with web presence and no doubt has use
for top notch IT people.......
What's that, you say? Oedipus works as a stock boy?
Oh. Never mind.
--
you're a sad little girl
beautiful and damned
Bob Larter
> Bob Larter wrote:
>> ah wrote:
>
>>>
>>> You really do need to get out of the basement, and breathe some
>>> oxygen, and
>>> stuff, Dude.
>>
>> You know someone's delusional when they boast about their l337
>> web-design skills, but actually work at WalMart.
>
> Wal Mart is an immense company with web presence and no doubt has use
> for top notch IT people.......
>
> What's that, you say? Oedipus works as a stock boy?
>
> Oh. Never mind.
Indeed. Sadder yet, he's a bi-sexual babyfur. What's a "babyfur" you
ask? Well, you'll wish you hadn't:
<http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Image:Onideus-pounced.jpg>
Bob Larter
> On Sun, 03 May 2009 22:09:53 -0400, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>> Well, Snits has been pretty mouthy here lately about *MY* websites, so
>>>> I thought it might be kinda fun to point out *HER* website (singular)
>>>> for everyone:
>>>> http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/
>>>>
>>>> ...woah. I mean...holy shit. It looks like some long lost remnant of
>>>> HTML v1 coding, slopped together without any sense of style, color
>>>> theory, or usability. Hell the bitch is so the fuck out of date she's
>>>> still relying on TABLES for CONTENT LAYOUT! o_O
>>> And yet it's a hell of a lot more entertaining than anything on your
>>> site, DiaperBoi.
>> ROLF!
>
> ...that, really wasn't funny...at all. And given how much I
> appreciate entertaining flames
It's a shame you've never written one.
Bob Larter
>
> I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of my diaper flapping. ^__^
So what else is new?
Onideus Mad Hatter
wrote:
>Emo Haircut wrote:
>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>> ah wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> You really do need to get out of the basement, and breathe some
>>>> oxygen, and
>>>> stuff, Dude.
>>>
>>> You know someone's delusional when they boast about their l337
>>> web-design skills, but actually work at WalMart.
>>
>> Wal Mart is an immense company with web presence and no doubt has use
>> for top notch IT people.......
>>
>> What's that, you say? Oedipus works as a stock boy?
>>
>> Oh. Never mind.
>
>In<WHACK>
Even more disturbing than Lionel's fantasies about me are the things
he does in his spare time:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_Usenet/Bitch_Slaps_-_Lionel_Makes_A_Nice_Poop.jpg
"The Honest One"
"ah" <splif...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> http://www.blackjelly.com/Mag/gallery/kli23.htm
> --
> ah
Demonstrating why "ah" is Usenet's most retarded poster !!
--
HJ
Onideus Mad Hatter
<hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Bob Larter wrote:
>> ah wrote:
>
>>>
>>> You really do need to get out of the basement, and breathe some
>>> oxygen, and
>>> stuff, Dude.
>>
>> You know someone's delusional when they boast about their l337
>> web-design skills, but actually work at WalMart.
>
>Wal Mart is an immense company with web presence and no doubt has use
>for top notch IT people.......
>
>What's that, you say? Oedipus works as a stock boy?
>
>Oh. Never mind.
I'm not a useless bitch like yourself, kid. If I were I might be
interested in an IT job. Those who have teh skillz though...we tend
to avoid IT jobs in general as it usually just equates to getting
horribly used. But as I said, you have no skill, so there's nothing
to exploit with you, now is there?
Onideus Mad Hatter
wrote:
> I'm sorry, I can't hear you over the sound of my diaper flapping. ^__^
So what else is new?
--
Onideus Mad Hatter
Onideus Mad Hatter
wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> On Sun, 03 May 2009 22:09:53 -0400, ah <splif...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>>>> Well, Snits has been pretty mouthy here lately about *MY* websites, so
>>>>> I thought it might be kinda fun to point out *HER* website (singular)
>>>>> for everyone:
>>>>> http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/
>>>>>
>>>>> ...woah. I mean...holy shit. It looks like some long lost remnant of
>>>>> HTML v1 coding, slopped together without any sense of style, color
>>>>> theory, or usability. Hell the bitch is so the fuck out of date she's
>>>>> still relying on TABLES for CONTENT LAYOUT! o_O
>>>> And yet it's a hell of a lot more entertaining than anything on your
>>>> site, DiaperBoi.
>>> ROLF!
>>
>> ...that, really wasn't funny...at all. And given how much I
>> appreciate entertaining flames
>I<WHACK>
BAD DOG, BAD!
*whistles*
Here Lionel, here Stupid! Fetch the post!
Emo Haircut
> Emo Haircut wrote:
>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>> ah wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> You really do need to get out of the basement, and breathe some
>>>> oxygen, and
>>>> stuff, Dude.
>>>
>>> You know someone's delusional when they boast about their l337
>>> web-design skills, but actually work at WalMart.
>>
>> Wal Mart is an immense company with web presence and no doubt has use
>> for top notch IT people.......
>>
>> What's that, you say? Oedipus works as a stock boy?
>>
>> Oh. Never mind.
>
> Indeed. Sadder yet, he's a bi-sexual babyfur. What's a "babyfur" you
> ask? Well, you'll wish you hadn't:
> <http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Image:Onideus-pounced.jpg>
That page is filled with win.
Emo Haircut
> On Mon, 04 May 2009 05:58:16 -0600, Emo Haircut
> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>> ah wrote:
>>>> You really do need to get out of the basement, and breathe some
>>>> oxygen, and
>>>> stuff, Dude.
>>> You know someone's delusional when they boast about their l337
>>> web-design skills, but actually work at WalMart.
>> Wal Mart is an immense company with web presence and no doubt has use
>> for top notch IT people.......
>>
>> What's that, you say? Oedipus works as a stock boy?
>>
>> Oh. Never mind.
>
> I'm not a useless bitch like yourself, kid.
I guess stocking shelves is some sort of skill. I guess. Maybe.
Onideus Mad Hatter
I'll say, I am the one who made it after all...still, needs to be
tidied up some. Lessers like yourself have been mucking it up with
pointless bullshit here lately.
Some have also argued with me that I'm not doing enough to put a
warning on that page, but I think people should have enough sense to
know that they shouldn't do to others what they wouldn't want done to
themselves, and in that sense the whole thing is essentially a warning
in and of itself.
That and it's not exactly some national secret that I use the thing as
a means of bypassing core trolling ethics. Really, that fact should
be more than obvious, what with the ever growing list 'o fauxpic
targets.
It should be noted though that it's not *ALL* fake, granted a lot of
my "fan art" is comissioned, there are quite a number of Hatter
Addicts so terminally obsessed with me that they make that shit all on
their own, out of anger and hatred.
I've got quite a number of semi-famous artists that I've comissioned
"fan art" from, like Astolpho for example:
http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_PoE/Hatter_Fan_Art/hi_matt.jpg
I'd really like to get a piece from Anry and from Mifmaf...something
from Muzz would be pretty cool too.
Onideus Mad Hatter
<hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 May 2009 05:58:16 -0600, Emo Haircut
>> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>> You really do need to get out of the basement, and breathe some
>>>>> oxygen, and
>>>>> stuff, Dude.
>>>> You know someone's delusional when they boast about their l337
>>>> web-design skills, but actually work at WalMart.
>>> Wal Mart is an immense company with web presence and no doubt has use
>>> for top notch IT people.......
>>>
>>> What's that, you say? Oedipus works as a stock boy?
>>>
>>> Oh. Never mind.
>>
>> I'm not a useless bitch like yourself, kid.
>
>I guess stocking shelves is some sort of skill. I guess. Maybe.
Well maybe if you keep stacking those shelves you can work your way up
to head cart pusher! WOW, won't that be something, huh? *nods*
Hu Flung Dung
weapons in a madman's hands, ye expanded:
> Well maybe if you keep stacking those shelves you can work your way up
> to head cart pusher!
... said the WalMart voice of experience,
Emo Haircut
>>>> Wal Mart is an immense company with web presence and no doubt has use
>>>> for top notch IT people.......
>>>>
>>>> What's that, you say? Oedipus works as a stock boy?
>>>>
>>>> Oh. Never mind.
>>> I'm not a useless bitch like yourself, kid.
>> I guess stocking shelves is some sort of skill. I guess. Maybe.
>
> Well maybe if you keep stacking those shelves you can work your way up
> to head cart pusher! WOW, won't that be something, huh? *nods*
See? Keep your chin up, trooper. You won't be a stock-boy forever!
Onideus Mad Hatter
Nah, I don't work in personnel, and I'm already as high as I can go
unless I want to be a department manager. The pay is nice, but the
hours suck horribly. You're scheduled for like 60 hour work
weeks...minimum.
Onideus Mad Hatter
<hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm not a useless bitch like yourself, kid.
>>> I guess stocking shelves is some sort of skill. I guess. Maybe.
>> Well maybe if you keep stacking those shelves you can work your way up
>> to head cart pusher! WOW, won't that be something, huh? *nods*
>Really? I'll keep my chin up. I won't be a stock-boy forever!
That's the spirit!
Emo Haircut
> On Wed, 06 May 2009 08:41:35 -0600, Emo Haircut
> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> I'm not a useless bitch like yourself, kid.
>
>>>> I guess stocking shelves is some sort of skill. I guess. Maybe.
>
>>> Well maybe if you keep stacking those shelves you can work your way up
>>> to head cart pusher! WOW, won't that be something, huh? *nods*
>
>> Really? I'll keep my chin up. I won't be a stock-boy forever!
>
> That's the spirit!
Post editing is for butt-hurt losers.
Loser.
Onideus Mad Hatter
<hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 May 2009 08:41:35 -0600, Emo Haircut
>> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> I'm not a useless bitch like yourself, kid.
>>
>>>>> I guess stocking shelves is some sort of skill. I guess. Maybe.
>>
>>>> Well maybe if you keep stacking those shelves you can work your way up
>>>> to head cart pusher! WOW, won't that be something, huh? *nods*
>>
>>> Really? I'll keep my chin up. I won't be a stock-boy forever!
>>
>> That's the spirit!
>
>I'm a butt-hurt loser who doesn't deserve anything more than post
>editing and bitch slaps across my idiot face.
Loser.
§ñühw¤£f
> On Wed, 06 May 2009 12:28:43 GMT, "Hu Flung Dung"
> <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter, ye wood-headed uncleanly scruples, you put sharp
>> weapons in a madman's hands, ye expanded:
>>
>>> Well maybe if you keep stacking those shelves you can work your way up
>>> to head cart pusher!
>> ... said the WalMart voice of experience,
>
> Nah, I don't work in personnel, and I'm already as high as I can go
> unless I want to be a department manager. The pay is nice, but the
> hours suck horribly. You're scheduled for like 60 hour work
> weeks...minimum.
>
Interesting. You just made the case for my argument that MAllWart abuses
its employados, si!
--
http://www.eyeonpalin.org
_____ ____ ____ __ /\_/\ __ _ ______ _____
/ __/ |/ / / / / // // . . \\ \ |\ | / __ \ \ \ __\
_\ \/ / /_/ / _ / \ / \ \| \| \ \_\ \ \__\ _\
/___/_/|_/\____/_//_/ \_@_/ \__|\__|\____/\____\_\
_..._ ___ ___ ___ ___ _..._
,' `::. ,~ `:. ,~ `:. ,~ `:. ,~ `:. ,' `::.
: `::: `:: `:: `:: `:: `:::
: .::: .:: .:: .:: .:: .:::
: .:::`. .;' `. .;' `. .;'.`. .;': .:::
: .::: `.' .`.'.: `.' ::`.' :. .:::
:. .::' ::: : `: .:::
`: .:: : : .::'
: .:: . :. .::
: ::' `: .::.
.\ `: ,: :. : .::.:
:.\ :. :.: :`: .' .::.:
::`. : :':: : `: : .;'.:
: `.; :'.:: : :: ;:' ::
. :' .::. .: .:: :
: :' ::: :' .:: .
: `:: : .::
:' .::. .: .:::
: .::: ,:. .:. :' .:::
: .:::,' `:. ,' `:.: .:::
: .::: ::: ::: .:::
: .::: ::: ::: .:::
`._ .::'.`._.::' `._.::'.`._ .::' _ Seal _
~~~ :: :: ~~~
Bob Larter
Well, *somebody* has to do it. Those shelves don't just fill themselves,
y'know.
Bob Larter
> On Tue, 05 May 2009 17:25:46 -0600, Emo Haircut
> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>> Emo Haircut wrote:
>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>> You really do need to get out of the basement, and breathe some
>>>>>> oxygen, and
>>>>>> stuff, Dude.
>>>>> You know someone's delusional when they boast about their l337
>>>>> web-design skills, but actually work at WalMart.
>>>> Wal Mart is an immense company with web presence and no doubt has use
>>>> for top notch IT people.......
>>>>
>>>> What's that, you say? Oedipus works as a stock boy?
>>>>
>>>> Oh. Never mind.
>>> Indeed. Sadder yet, he's a bi-sexual babyfur. What's a "babyfur" you
>>> ask? Well, you'll wish you hadn't:
>>> <http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Image:Onideus-pounced.jpg>
>> That page is filled with win.
>
> I'll say, I am the one who made it after all...still, needs to be
> tidied up some. Lessers like yourself have been mucking it up with
> pointless bullshit here lately.
Too bad you don't have edit access at ED, DiaperBoi. ;^)
> Some have also argued with me that I'm not doing enough to put a
> warning on that page, but I think people should have enough sense to
> know that they shouldn't do to others what they wouldn't want done to
> themselves, and in that sense the whole thing is essentially a warning
> in and of itself.
You can't put anything on that page, DiaperBoi, because they blocked you
out for being a complete idiot.
> That and it's not exactly some national secret that I use the thing as
> a means of bypassing core trolling ethics. Really, that fact should
> be more than obvious, what with the ever growing list 'o fauxpic
> targets.
How, exactly, is it "bypassing core trolling ethics" to have ED laughing
at you?
> It should be noted though that it's not *ALL* fake, granted a lot of
> my "fan art" is comissioned, there are quite a number of Hatter
> Addicts so terminally obsessed with me that they make that shit all on
> their own, out of anger and hatred.
>
> I've got quite a number of semi-famous artists that I've comissioned
> "fan art" from, like Astolpho for example:
> http://www.backwater-productions.net/_images/_PoE/Hatter_Fan_Art/hi_matt.jpg
DiaperBoi, the funniest part of all this is that you genuinely think
that anyone would believe that all this shit is just trolling on your
part. You used that same lame excuse when we first discovered all your
diaper-fetish posts, & it didn't fool anyone then either.
Bob Larter
> On Tue, 05 May 2009 17:25:51 -0600, Emo Haircut
> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Mon, 04 May 2009 05:58:16 -0600, Emo Haircut
>>> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>> You really do need to get out of the basement, and breathe some
>>>>>> oxygen, and
>>>>>> stuff, Dude.
>>>>> You know someone's delusional when they boast about their l337
>>>>> web-design skills, but actually work at WalMart.
>>>> Wal Mart is an immense company with web presence and no doubt has use
>>>> for top notch IT people.......
>>>>
>>>> What's that, you say? Oedipus works as a stock boy?
>>>>
>>>> Oh. Never mind.
>>> I'm not a useless bitch like yourself, kid.
>> I guess stocking shelves is some sort of skill. I guess. Maybe.
>
> Well maybe if you keep stacking those shelves you can work your way up
> to head cart pusher! WOW, won't that be something, huh? *nods*
No need to get so excited, DiaperBoi, I'm sure that one day, your boss
will give an opportunity to try out for cart-retrieval.
Bob Larter
Funny how his "world-class Flash designer" skills can't get him a better
job.
Bob Larter
Maybe if he studies maths really hard, they'll let him work a register.
I bet you'd like that, eh DiaperBoi?
Veronica Karlsson
>
> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
> >
> > >Oh, look! A long sub-thread with my name on it!
> > >
> > >*beams*
> >
> > Hatter Addicts do love it when I give them some attention. It's nice
> > to see you're so open about how much you *LOVE* getting it from me.
> > The feeling I'm afraid is pretty single sided though, as the only
> > thing I can manage to feel when seeing and reading any of your posts
> > is, well...pity...mixed with mostly apathy and stolid cynicism.
> >
> > Your boiler-plate style of nebbish, puerile animadversion most often
> > amounts to little more than vapid insipidity at its best.
> >
> > >But no context kept from previous discussion...
> >
> > What context? You said my website(s) "sucked" (your malformed cock
> > apparently). Your stuporous paroxysm is senseless verbiage more than
> > context and hardly worth even mentioning.
> >
> > >Is somebody trying to
> > >change the subject? Why? Could it be because his homepage (singular)
> > >sucks?
> >
> > This coming from the little girl crying her eyes out cause dat mean
> > 'ol Mad Hatter all went and decided to redirect her little tantrum
> > back onto her own sites...
>
> You mean, change focus away from what was being discussed: your
> homepage.
>
> > of course, unlike you, child, I've much moar
> > than the innocuous irascibility that you derive your halfwitted verbal
> > "attacks" from. And one can see just how effective my critiques are,
> > what with how you took the whole site down shortly after reading my
> > post. LOL You really are *THAT* ashamed of your own work, aren't
> > you? ^__^
> >
>
> Ludd has been down all day, including all the homepages there, not just
> mine.
>
> > >Could it be be cause he has no good answer to the question "Why
> > >should I give you meaningful critique about your homepage?"
> >
> > Well it would certainly take less effort than all the desultory tail
> > chasing assiduity that you've shown so far...not that you have much
> > choice in the matter, what with how you're far too nebbish to even
> > begin to try and formulate an ardorous verbal conflagration of
> > critical condemnation. Not to mention your incredible poverty of
> > intellect, a literal vacancy of mind as you fumble about with such
> > reaching, infantile attempts at painting misnomers onto other people's
> > work, all the while your own skills clearly defining you as a
> > perpetual poser class dipshit, all your websites looking like vomit
> > stained hangovers from the Clinton administration.
>
> *still not feeling motivated to give meaningful critique about Mad Boy's
> homepage*
>
> > >*pokes Mad Boy*
> >
> > *Hatter sets you ablaze.*
> >
> > ...you make a lovely fire. ^__^
> >
> > >That's my homepage, yes.
> >
> > Correction, *WAS* your homepage, it appears you've taken it down out
> > of shame (unsurprisingly).
> >
> > >> ...woah. I mean...holy shit.
> >
> > >Yes, I've neglected the poor thing for years. So what?
> >
> > Is your stupidity so brobdingnagian that you honestly need me to
> > explain this to you?
> >
> > LOL, this moony dipshit apparently thinks that a couple high school
> > physics classes make her a reliable source to "critique" the works of
> > Einstein. Sorry, not so much "critiquing" as 2nd grade level name
> > calling in your particular case, huh Spergs?
>
> *fails to see similarity between Mad Boy and Einstein*
>
> > >> It looks like some long lost remnant of
> > >> HTML v1 coding, slopped together without any sense of style, color
> > >> theory, or usability. Hell the bitch is so the fuck out of date she's
> > >> still relying on TABLES for CONTENT LAYOUT! o_O
> >
> > >don't have much "layout", I have content, with a little html as "glue"
> > >to make it presentable on the web.) I did once, and then I learned
> > >better and ripped out that shit, but that was over ten years ago. I
> > >haven't changed much since then (and no, I do not consider that to be a
> > >Bad Thing).
> >
> > Your "glue" looks like it was spaghetti bitched out of Netscape
> > Composer. Good thing you took down that piece of shit. *checks* Oh
> > look, you brought it back up with "improved" coding. Let's take a
> > look!
> >
>
> Huh?
>
> sister~/www/htdocs>ls -l index.shtml
> -rw-r--r-- 1 vk ludduser 2104 Feb 3 17:19 index.shtml
> sister~/www/htdocs>
>
> No, haven't done anything to that file today.
>
> > : <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd">
> > : <head>
> > :
> > : <TITLE>Veronica Karlsson's Homepage</TITLE>
> > : <META name="description" content="An ascii art chat room,
> > : info about ascii art, among other things, can be
> > : found on this site.">
> > : <META name="keywords" content="ascii art, ascii pictures, ascii images,
> > : typewriter art, Tove Veronica Karlsson, ascii art chat, chat rooms,
> > : veronica karlssons hemsida">
> > : <base target="_top">
> > : <link rel="shortcut icon" href="/~vk/favicon.ico" />
> > : <link rel="icon" type="image/x-icon" href="/~vk/favicon.ico" />
> > :
> > : <LINK REL="StyleSheet" href="/~vk/ram/1style.css" type="text/css" MEDIA="screen">
> > : </HEAD>
> > : <BODY>
> > : <center>
> > :
> > : <i>( v...@ludd.luth.se http://www.ludd.luth.se/users/vk/ )</i><br>
> > :
> > : <h1><img src="pics/misc/veronica.gif" alt="Veronica" width=335 height=60>
> > : <img src="pics/misc/karlssons.gif" alt="Karlsson's" width=394 height=60>
> > : <img src="pics/misc/homepage.gif" alt="Homepage" width=368 height=60></h1>
> > :
> > :
> > : <P><!-- #include virtual="message.html" -->
> > :
> > :
> > : <div class=drh align=center><hr width="80%" size=2 noshade></div>
> > :
> > : <pre>
> > :
> > : </pre>
> > :
> > : <table cellpadding=15 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr><td align="center">
> > : <img src="me/me.gif" border=0 WIDTH=93 HEIGHT=137 alt="">
> > :
> > : </td><td>
> > : <h1>Who is Veronica?<br></H1>
> > : <b><big>I am the best!<br> no question about that,<br>
> > : so be very very happy,<BR> that I let you visit my homepage!</big></b>
> > : </td></tr></table>
> > :
> > : <pre>
> > :
> > : </pre>
> > :
> > : <p><big>
> > : [<A HREF="docs/docs.shtml">misc.</a>]
> > : [<A HREF="pics/ascii/ascii.shtml">ascii art</a>]
> > : [<A HREF="pics/ascii/chat/index.shtml">chat</a>]
> > : [<A HREF="docs/links/links.shtml">links</a>]
> > : [<A HREF="docs/news.shtml">news</a>]
> > : </big>
> > :
> > : <div class=drh align=center><hr width="80%" size=2 noshade></div>
> > :
> > : <P><IMG SRC="pics/misc/blue_ribbon.gif" width=42 height=69 alt="">
> > : <a href="me/"><img src="pics/misc/catl.gif" width=50 height=50 alt="" border=0 align=left vspace=10></a>
> > : <img src="pics/misc/cat.gif" width=50 height=50 alt="" border=0 align=right vspace=10>
> > : <P><a href="mailto:vk@ludd.luth.se">vk@ludd.luth.se</a><br>
> > :
> > :
> > : </CENTER>
> > : </BODY>
> >
> > Tsch, tsch, tsch...okay kitten, first thing here, when you start
> > MIXING tags in ALL CAPS and tags in lower case...yeah that's pretty
> > much a dead give away that you're spaghetti bitching your code out of
> > various sites, basically ripping off parts from other people's sites
> > and then pasting them into your sloppy ass mess because you can't
> > actually code on your own.
>
> Or maybe my style changed as I made changes over the last thirteen
> years?
>
> > Second, you're *STILL* using tables for content layout:
> >
> > : <table cellpadding=15 cellspacing=0 border=0><tr><td align="center">
> > : <img src="me/me.gif" border=0 WIDTH=93 HEIGHT=137 alt="">
> > :
> > : </td><td>
> > : <h1>Who is Veronica?<br></H1>
> > : <b><big>I am the best!<br> no question about that,<br>
> > : so be very very happy,<BR> that I let you visit my homepage!</big></b>
> > : </td></tr></table>
> >
>
> Oh, you are right, so I am! :-D
>
> > What the fuck is that shit? Are division layers (or just straight
> > CSS) *REALLY* that complicated for you?
> >
> > And once again I point out all the MASSIVE mixing of tag styles, which
> > clearly indicate that you were copying and pasting from dozens of
> > different sources no doubt.
> >
> > This right here though:
> > : <!-- #include virtual="message.html" -->
> >
> > That's my *FAVORITE* part of your website. Why? Because it's a
> > cookie cutter imprint, likely from MS FrontPage or some other training
>
> No, that line is actually handwritten by me. If I remove one space it
> ceases to be an html comment and instead includes another file with a
> message. Instead of re-learning how to do includes every time I want a
> message there I just remove that space... Not elegant, but practical.
> :-D
>
> > pants web page making piece of shit, specifically designed for
> > complete amateurs who haven't clue fucking one as to what HTML even
> > is. LOL
> >
> > I could go on of course, I can think of more than a dozen different
> > things just within your code alone that I could easily rip apart,
>
> Me too. I don't rip up everything I ever made every time I learn
> something new. I don't necessarily throw it away either.
>
> > but
> > I think I've got enough up so far...I don't wanna drown my new toy too
> > quickly. ^__^
> >
> > The pleasurable satisfaction of ripping apart some poser class dipshit
> > with high levels of unwarranted self importance, like yourself, with
> > meaningful critiques,
>
> The only "meaningful critique" you've come up with so far is that I'm a
> little bit behind in my updating of stuff. I already knew that.
>
> > hard facts and infallible arguments is like pure
> > ecstasy to someone of my level. And once again, you're so far the
> > fuck outta yer league you can't even come up with a *SINGLE* critique
> > of my perfectionistic web work.
>
> Sure I can: it sucks.
>
> > >> I mean...holy shit. Even the most pathetic of amateur class college
> > >> flunkies can figure out division layers, hell I even wrote a basic FAQ
> > >> for how to use them:
> > >> http://groups-beta.google.com/group/alt.2600/msg/dc582b7a21b9f0e1
> >
> > >is ascii art and a simple <pre> tag handles that just fine.
> >
> > You don't have to use layers, you could just use CSS directly and the
> > obvious reason (to anyone who actually knows how to code HTML) is that
> > you get absolute, independent, precision alignment. Where as with
> > your tables every part within the table is all dependant upon all the
> > other parts for their imprecise alignment.
>
> OK... well... my opinion is that "flexible" is better than "precise", on
> web pages.
>
> > Take out even a single
> > part (or add one) and likely your whole table will fall all apart and
> > out of the alignment that you wanted.
> >
> > >> ...and trust me, it doesn't *GET* any more basic than *THAT*. *rolls
> > >> eyes*
> >
> > >content that isn't extremely basic.
> > >
> > >(Clue: "extremely basic" is not a synonym for "bad")
> >
> > That depends on the usage, Kiddo. If you need an "extremely basic",
> > training pants style guide to building websites with HTML, which isn't
> > even a real programming language...yeah...yer likely not ever gonna
> > get above the level of poser class amateur when it comes to making
> > websites.
>
> Maybe I'm just interested in using my personal homepage to communicate
> with people...
>
> > That's not necessarily a bad thing though, I mean it's not as if
> > you're going to be making any professional level websites or anything,
> > however you really ought to watch your big fat ugly mouth, before you
> > start mawing off about shit you know nothing about. Your "ability" to
> > rip off HTML from other people whilst forcibly RAPING it up the ass
> > does *NOT* in *ANY* way make you qualified to critique a website...or
> > in your case throw around playground level lames whilst stomping up
> > and down in indignant frustration.
>
> I do know this much: your homepage sucks.
>
> > >> This doofy little retard is so the fuck out dated she still has a BLUE
> > >> RIBBON on her site (as a poorly compressed GIF I might add),
> >
> > >it!
> >
> > Your cheesy clipart looks like shit. It does remind me of something
> > pretty funny though. *looks it up* Ahhh, here it is, the reasons why
> > Veronica Karlsson is like clipart:
> >
> > She takes up space in the absence of substance.
> > She's poorly drawn and badly colored.
> > There hasn't been a real use for her since Windows 3.11.
> > She's way too simple.
> > She sticks out like a sore thumb.
> > She lacks style.
> > She's 2D.
> > She only appeals to the easily impressed.
> > Her only purpose is to take up space.
> > She's only worth money in large groups.
> > Inexpensive, colorful, but ultimately unfulfilling.
> > She's a placeholder for something better.
> > In fact, she *IS* the stick man scratching his head in confusion.
> > Most people cringe when they see her.
> >
>
> Is this the output of some kind of "funny site"? What's the URL?
>
> > >> despite
> > >> the fact that the blue ribbon campaign essentially went dead
> > >> like...over a DECADE ago.
> >
> >
> > Yeah, actually it pretty much has. Basically the blue ribbon campaign
> > died out when it was suddenly pointed out that the campaign
> > essentially sought to TAKE AWAY the free speech of those who owned
> > their own servers. If you own your own server you have *ALL* the free
> > speech you like, but if you're on SOMEONE ELSE'S server...no, that's
> > THEIR free speech, not yours, you're just a guest.
> >
> > >> Hell, this dipshit is *SO* out of date
> > >> she's still using CLIP ART on her site! Single color clip art at
> > >> that.
> >
> > >reader. :-)
> >
> > The difference of course being that Usenet still serves a viable
> > purpose...where as clipart *NEVER* really served any purpose at
> > all...other than to take up space...senseless filler. Of course the
> > truly sad thing is that you're not even using MODERN clip art. I
> > mean, honestly, how the fuck long would it take your dumbass to run a
> > Google image search to get a newer, better looking graphic? It's like
> > you're purposefully trying to watch HDTV on some 50 year old black and
> > white 13 inch television...it's *THAT* stupid.
>
> ?
>
> > >> Here, wait, this is even funnier, check out what her server directory
> > >> structure looks like:
> > >> http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/pics/ascii/chat/archive/
> > >>
> > >> Oh and uh, do note the fact that she's still working on the folder for
> > >> TWO THOUSAND.
> >
> > >I'll just continue to ignore it for a while longer.
> > >
> > >*shrug*
> >
> > I don't think you're ever going to update it actually.
>
> That is quite possible.
>
> > Unless you
> > come under the delusion that somebody actually gives a shit about your
> > crappy site. They don't, btw, mostly because there are dozens of
> > sites already that are devoted to your site's primary subject (ASCII
> > art), most of which have thousands of examples, great organization,
> > color ASCII art, animated ASCII art, 3D ASCII art and even a variety
> > of programs to turn your pictures and even video into ASCII art.
>
> As a collector of ascii art I know that I really like to see an artist's
> own homepage, because there you are likely to see everything that person
> made, including the stuff that didn't appeal to other collectors.
>
> > At this point I'm not really sure you can call it an "art" so much,
> > what with how nobody does ASCII art by hand anymore, it's all done via
> > programs that generates the "art" from any source material you like.
> >
> > >> Yup, that's right, Veronica Sucks-Cock Karlsson is
> > >> essentially trapped back the fuck in the year 2000. Perhaps it's some
> > >> strange temporal anomaly having to do with Y2K? Perhaps some alien
> > >> technology was implanted up her fat ugly ass and when the year 2K came
> > >> along her anal probe just wasn't Y2K compliant. *nods* That's really
> > >> the only plausible explanation I can think of for just how incredibly
> > >> out of date she is.
> > >>
> > >> ...on the other hand though I think she's from some third world
> > >> country over in Europe that everyone else forgot about, so maybe
> > >> they're just not very advanced...or their backwards government
> > >> restricts their computer learning to everything dated BEFORE 1997. LOL
> >
> >
> > Yeah it sucks yer mama's titties alright. Wanna buy some pictures?
>
> Oh, yeah: your homepage sucks!
_
/' `.
/ /
_ /| _ /__ /
| \ / | '.`-Z__ `/
_ |_/ / \| |\ | "`-._`-._
/ _ | | | \| .::. `-._)
\_/ \ | \ | / ::' a
_/ |/\ :: >
| \ :' _C
_/ /_______,_
||||| .' \_____)_,L
||||.\ / _______)__)
||||| c /_ /
|||| --. / `-..'
//|( ) )\__,__.----. /
\\)____|`--'--.____.'{
'( j | \ \ \
| /\ | \ \ \
VK (_| (_\ \_\__\__
`-` `-` \_\____)
--
__ __ _____ _____ ______ __ _ _ _____ __
||| \ \ ) )/ / \|| | \ \ / / \ \ | \ | || | / / \| ) \
||.. \ \/ /| |_/| | |_/ /| | | || \ | || || | / \
|.PP. \ / | | \| | | \ \| | | || |\_\| || || | / /\ \
_\/___ \_( \_\__/||_| \_\\_\__/_/ |_| |_||_| \_\__/|(_( \_\
|_______ Troll Spokeswoman _____ http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/ ___|
Bob Larter
> On Wed, 06 May 2009 12:28:43 GMT, "Hu Flung Dung"
> <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter, ye wood-headed uncleanly scruples, you put sharp
>> weapons in a madman's hands, ye expanded:
>>
>>> Well maybe if you keep stacking those shelves you can work your way up
>>> to head cart pusher!
>> ... said the WalMart voice of experience,
>
> Nah, I don't work in personnel, and I'm already as high as I can go
> unless I want to be a department manager. The pay is nice, but the
> hours suck horribly. You're scheduled for like 60 hour work
> weeks...minimum.
And yet you still claim that it's a better job than being a
web-designer, which you claim to be so good at.
Bob Larter
> On Wed, 06 May 2009 08:41:35 -0600, Emo Haircut
> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I'm not a useless bitch like yourself, kid.
>>> I guess stocking shelves is some sort of skill. I guess. Maybe.
>> Well maybe if you keep stacking those shelves you can work your way up
>> to head cart pusher! WOW, won't that be something, huh? *nods*
> Really? I'll keep my chin up. I won't be a stock-boy forever!
That's the spirit!
--
Bob Larter
It's the nappy-rash talking. His mommy obviously hasn't been using the
lotion when she's been changing him.
Dur
wrote on 5/7/09 4:39 AM:
> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 May 2009 12:28:43 GMT, "Hu Flung Dung"
>> <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Onideus Mad Hatter, ye wood-headed uncleanly scruples, you put sharp
>>> weapons in a madman's hands, ye expanded:
>>>
>>>> Well maybe if you keep stacking those shelves you can work your way up
>>>> to head cart pusher!
>>> ... said the WalMart voice of experience,
>>
>> Nah, I don't work in personnel, and I'm already as high as I can go
>> unless I want to be a department manager. The pay is nice, but the
>> hours suck horribly. You're scheduled for like 60 hour work
>> weeks...minimum.
>
> And yet you still claim that it's a better job than being a
> web-designer, which you claim to be so good at.
based on two sites
Bob Larter
Both of which are crap.
Emo Haircut
> Emo Haircut wrote:
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Mon, 04 May 2009 05:58:16 -0600, Emo Haircut
>>> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Bob Larter wrote:
>>>>> ah wrote:
>>>>>> You really do need to get out of the basement, and breathe some
>>>>>> oxygen, and
>>>>>> stuff, Dude.
>>>>> You know someone's delusional when they boast about their l337
>>>>> web-design skills, but actually work at WalMart.
>>>> Wal Mart is an immense company with web presence and no doubt has
>>>> use for top notch IT people.......
>>>>
>>>> What's that, you say? Oedipus works as a stock boy?
>>>>
>>>> Oh. Never mind.
>>>
>>> I'm not a useless bitch like yourself, kid.
>>
>> I guess stocking shelves is some sort of skill. I guess. Maybe.
>
> Well, *somebody* has to do it. Those shelves don't just fill themselves,
> y'know.
First In First Out! Labels facing front!
Onideus Mad Hatter
wrote:
>Emo Haircut wrote:
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Wal Mart is an immense company with web presence and no doubt has
>>>>>> use for top notch IT people.......
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's that, you say? Oedipus works as a stock boy?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh. Never mind.
>>>>> I'm not a useless bitch like yourself, kid.
>>>> I guess stocking shelves is some sort of skill. I guess. Maybe.
>>>
>>> Well maybe if you keep stacking those shelves you can work your way up
>>> to head cart pusher! WOW, won't that be something, huh? *nods*
>>
>> See? Keep your chin up, trooper. You won't be a stock-boy forever!
>
>Ma<WHACK>
Holy shit...man this tard just freakin EXPLODED his idiocy all over
the place. I mean he's made like...what...nearly FIFTY posts all in
the span of two hours, all of them hand made, all of them frothing on
about me...yeesh...I musta struck six or eight prime nerves in that
boi to get him so completely undone. Tsch, tsch, tsch...poor boi
can't handle a flame I guess. He just goes all to
pieces...literarily. LOL
With as terminally fuckin lame as he is though it's not really much of
a surprise that he can't comprehend such a simplistic concept as
QUALITY over QUANTITY. The drooling dipshit thinks he's running some
kind of a race or something, but he's so damn stupid he can't figure
it out that he's just running against himself in the Special Olympics,
with those liak me just heckling him on from the side lines. ^__^
Honestly Lionel Bawler, it really doesn't matter how much of a tantrum
you throw...you're still just a retard, and that's all you'll ever be.
*shrugs*
Onideus Mad Hatter
...great, she's replying to herself with garbage text now. Oh well,
at least ~somebody~ took the time to read and reply to her retarded
post...even if it was just her. LOL Personally I just don't have
much patients for retards and spergs, and honestly, it's not like I
can fix stupid. It's like those who are trying to get CWC to back off
and quit making an idiot of himself...he won't listen, because he's an
idiot! Really, Veronica thinking that THIS:
http://www.ludd.luth.se/~vk/
...looks better than my websites, isn't *ANY* different than CWC
thinking that THIS:
: http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/2/29/Chris-chan_self_portrait.jpg
...is the most awesomest artwork ever created. Yeah, I'm tellin ya,
these two "high functioning autistics" were practically made for each
other. What do you say, Veronica, do you want to be Chris's
"boyfriend free girl" that he can "turn into a sweetheart from the
ground up" (no "darkies" though)?
Oh, wait, I think Chris has some sort of aversion to other "high
functioning autistics", as well as blacks, so that might exclude you
then, huh Spergs?
Emo Haircut
As if it wasn't *already* hilarious.....
Onideus Mad Hatter
wrote:
>Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 May 2009 12:28:43 GMT, "Hu Flung Dung"
>> <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> Onideus Mad Hatter, ye wood-headed uncleanly scruples, you put sharp
>>> weapons in a madman's hands, ye expanded:
>>>
>>>> Well maybe if you keep stacking those shelves you can work your way up
>>>> to head cart pusher!
>>> ... said the WalMart voice of experience,
>>
>> Nah, I don't work in personnel, and I'm already as high as I can go
>> unless I want to be a department manager. The pay is nice, but the
>> hours suck horribly. You're scheduled for like 60 hour work
>> weeks...minimum.
>>
>
>Interesting. You just made the case for my argument that MAllWart abuses
>its employados, si!
Except that it's by choice, Dumbass, and considering how much you make
an hour, plus the guaranteed overtime...yeah, you can make a LOT of
money REAL fast.
spooge
news:4a02612c$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au:
> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>> On Tue, 05 May 2009 17:25:46 -0600, Emo Haircut
>> <hairc...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>> That and it's not exactly some national secret that I use the thing
>> as a means of bypassing core trolling ethics. Really, that fact
>> should be more than obvious, what with the ever growing list 'o
>> fauxpic targets.
>
> How, exactly, is it "bypassing core trolling ethics" to have ED
> laughing at you?
After he explains that, perhaps he'll explain what code of ethics he
follows when he does his inane trolling of of web sites with target
audiences of children and/or the emotionally infantile.
IMO he does it because he's comfortable with targetting his peers, but it's
worth asking to get confirmation.
[...]
--
Let me say
Pepsi Generation
A few lines
Of misinformation
Watch your money
Flow away oh so quick
To kill yourself properly,
Coke is it
Bob Larter
Change that diaper!
Bob Larter
Poor friendless DiaperBoi. It really must suck to be a lonely 28 year
old virgin who still lives with his mother.
Bob Larter
> On Wed, 06 May 2009 16:03:26 -0600, ���hw��f <snuh...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Onideus Mad Hatter wrote:
>>> On Wed, 06 May 2009 12:28:43 GMT, "Hu Flung Dung"
>>> <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Onideus Mad Hatter, ye wood-headed uncleanly scruples, you put sharp
>>>> weapons in a madman's hands, ye expanded:
>>>>
>>>>> Well maybe if you keep stacking those shelves you can work your way up
>>>>> to head cart pusher!
>>>> ... said the WalMart voice of experience,
>>> Nah, I don't work in personnel, and I'm already as high as I can go
>>> unless I want to be a department manager. The pay is nice, but the
>>> hours suck horribly. You're scheduled for like 60 hour work
>>> weeks...minimum.
>>>
>> Interesting. You just made the case for my argument that MAllWart abuses
>> its employados, si!
>
> Except that it's by choice, Dumbass, and considering how much you make
> an hour, plus the guaranteed overtime...yeah, you can make a LOT of
> money REAL fast.
Well, more money than /you/ can make as a web-designer, obviously.