The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: alt.design.graphics
From: mark r <markr...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 01:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, May 24 2008 4:44 am
Subject: Re: Where do you stand on website "form vs. function"?
On May 17, 12:23 am, Fred Doyle <fdoy...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:
> WebAward wrote: unless you're brand building where theres no direct financial > > Website design usually gets classified into two categories: functional > > (read: user-friendly) or innovative ('artistic,' lots of interactive, > > etc.). I've noticed that a lot of times sites that are noted as having > > great design are a little difficult for the average user to navigate. > > Do you think form and function are mutually exclusive, or can a site > > be incredibly innovative AND incredibly functional? > They are never mutually exclusive. The aesthetics by which you judge the > Fred motivation to use the site then its function all of the way.. it has to be otherwise you'd be hemorrhaging sales/enquiries etc You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||