Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Where do you stand on website "form vs. function"?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  4 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
WebAward  
View profile
 More options May 16, 2:14 pm
Newsgroups: alt.design.graphics
From: WebAward <webawar...@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:14:11 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 2:14 pm
Subject: Where do you stand on website "form vs. function"?
Website design usually gets classified into two categories: functional
(read: user-friendly) or innovative ('artistic,' lots of interactive,
etc.). I've noticed that a lot of times sites that are noted as having
great design are a little difficult for the average user to navigate.
Do you think form and function are mutually exclusive, or can a site
be incredibly innovative AND incredibly functional?

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Fred Doyle  
View profile
 More options May 16, 7:23 pm
Newsgroups: alt.design.graphics
From: Fred Doyle <fdoy...@nycap.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 19:23:06 -0400
Local: Fri, May 16 2008 7:23 pm
Subject: Re: Where do you stand on website "form vs. function"?

WebAward wrote:
> Website design usually gets classified into two categories: functional
> (read: user-friendly) or innovative ('artistic,' lots of interactive,
> etc.). I've noticed that a lot of times sites that are noted as having
> great design are a little difficult for the average user to navigate.
> Do you think form and function are mutually exclusive, or can a site
> be incredibly innovative AND incredibly functional?

They are never mutually exclusive. The aesthetics by which you judge the
beauty of the site's form are dependent on the goals of the site.

Fred


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
mark r  
View profile
 More options May 24, 4:44 am
Newsgroups: alt.design.graphics
From: mark r <markr...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 01:44:33 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Sat, May 24 2008 4:44 am
Subject: Re: Where do you stand on website "form vs. function"?
On May 17, 12:23 am, Fred Doyle <fdoy...@nycap.rr.com> wrote:

> WebAward wrote:
> > Website design usually gets classified into two categories: functional
> > (read: user-friendly) or innovative ('artistic,' lots of interactive,
> > etc.). I've noticed that a lot of times sites that are noted as having
> > great design are a little difficult for the average user to navigate.
> > Do you think form and function are mutually exclusive, or can a site
> > be incredibly innovative AND incredibly functional?

> They are never mutually exclusive. The aesthetics by which you judge the
> beauty of the site's form are dependent on the goals of the site.

> Fred

unless you're brand building where theres no direct financial
motivation to use the site then its function all of the way.. it has
to be otherwise you'd be hemorrhaging sales/enquiries etc

    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Fred Doyle  
View profile
 More options May 27, 8:36 am
Newsgroups: alt.design.graphics
From: Fred Doyle <fdoy...@nycap.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 08:36:28 -0400
Local: Tues, May 27 2008 8:36 am
Subject: Re: Where do you stand on website "form vs. function"?

The implication in your post is that there are only two types of web
sites, eCommerce and branding. I don't believe that's true. At least one
vendor I work with describes 5 types of sites. Besides eCommerce and
branding, they categorize other sites as:

Self-Service
        Goal to reduce costs by providing alternative means to service
available elsewhere (help desk, forms, etc.)

Lead generation
        Revenue Sources - increasing sales
        The inquiry based site you suggest above

Content
        Revenue sources - ads and selling of names and other market data
        Goals - visitor registration, stickiness

The content site in particular needs to blend form and function
carefully. Information has to be presented in a form that makes it easy
to find (i.e. supports the function) and in a way that lends credibility
and acceptance to the information. Here, form can play a very important
role.

Beyond the 5 listed by the vendor, I'd add a few more. First, personal
sites, i.e. sites that exist for personal expression. Here, form and
function are the hardest to separate.

Hobby sites - Similar to the content sites above but without the revenue
sources.

Social Sites - Goal to build community. May or may not have revenue
goals. The community alone may be the purpose. Form may determine the
acceptance of the site among the social network.

I don't have hard data but the 3 types above may actually outnumber the
hard eCommerce and branding sites in terms of numbers on the Internet.

Fred


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google