George Bush's Nazi Regime George Bush's whole administration has all the earmarks of a well prepared nazi-type regime! They are working on it tooth and claw! The only thing they need now is an internal terrorist threat, or civil disorder growing from anti-war protests to justify declaring a National Emergency with its protests to justify declaring a National Emergency with its legally sanctioned suspension of Constitutionally protected rights. Concentration camps for hard-core anti-war activists will be supported by the stupidity silent majority with their brainless, moronic, imbecilic, blind and bigoted moral retardation. Hence idiotic flag-waving becomes a substitute for rational analysis, and Jerry Falwell Bible Thumping a means of conditioning the rah rah war crowd to perceive anti-war protestors as low-life scum and traitors who need to be locked up or shot by loyal, awesomely patriotic volunteers like Marino Sicki of Arch-hate-a, Calif. who has publicly proclaimed his desire to kill protestors.
So I have a feeling that by this Spring civil unrest and economic turmoil will exacerbate domestic problems sufficiently to permit administrative type detention policies to be implemented by the Tyrant Bush with the complete support of all war-loving red, white, and blue American zombies. This demented hard-hat mental disease was prevalent during the Vietnam war era and those that don't learn from history eventually get a rude awakening. The economy is going to be so bad: the whole situation is going to be so bad; more oppressive measures will be imposed. They're already establishing special camps for those deemed a threat to national determination of your subversive potential rather than on any overt acts you may have committed.
AMERICAN ARE THE MOST BLIND PEOPLE ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH. Bush is taking a typical hard-line Hitlerian attitude. NO, not unless they meet OUR terms. No give. No bending, inflexible, brittle, and the reason is, we don't want to get out the Persian Gulf! We can't get out or our economy will collapse, especially right now, as bad as things are. Usually presidents use War as a remedy for a Depression. They certainly won't get us out of a war already in progress that's barely keeping our heads above water to keep us from going into a full-scale Depression! SO THEY'RE SURE AS HELL NOT GOING TO GET US OUT OF THIS WAR! THEY WILL LIE AND LIE AND LIE AND THEN WRAP THEMSELVES IN THE FLAG WHILE THEY ARE A LIVING DISGRACE TO EVERYTHING NOBLE AND HONORABLE. Why all this sudden desperate show of Americanism? "We are AMERICANS. This is our swastika. Everywhere the swastikas are flying to show that they're a red-blooded, red-white-and blue American. The rest of you are radicals, traitors, hippies, disloyal communists, and whatnot, subhuman scum, etc. and we're gonna wipe you out!"
The Palestinian Revolt: WHY? There is a place in Arab Palestine They call the Jewish State It's founders were bloody terrorists In the year of nineteen-forty-eight.
They murdered, bombed and plundered Stole the Arab's land with glee Saying, "2,000 years ago we lived here It used to be our property"!
But the Arab families who'd been dwelling there Before the first 'Jew' was ever born Resisted the expulsion from their humble homes And met even greater Jewish Hate and Scorn!
The wealth and power of world Jewry was then Funnelled into this unholy cause With absolutely no respect for human rights And in defiance of International Laws.
Millions of innocent Palestinians Were violently driven from their own land By a cruel and relentless oppressor With an evil mind and blood-drenched hand.
Some escaped to Lebanon only To live in refugee camps of pain Where jewish jets dropped fire-ball bombs And jewish soldiers butchered children as Cain
Killed his brother Able in a fit of rage Like King Herod killed the babies under two years of age the butchers cut the babies from the pregnant Arab mother's womb and turned the refugee Camps into an Arab children's tomb.
American Jewish leaders and their bought politician Were very clever and extremely bright In convincing the American public That their wicked deeds were just and right!
In the Jewish occupied places the Arabs had to rebel Against the violent repression of an Israeli-made Hell the Arab children of Palestine ring freedom's bell in a demonstration too powerful for Jewish tyrants to quell.
In article <1991Feb17.195430.20...@lynx.CS.ORST.EDU> na...@mist.CS.ORST.EDU (Abdenacer Moussaoui C.) writes:
> ... much drivel deleted ...
>Joseph Shepherd
Why is this drivel being posted to S.C.J?
And further: Why is this drivel being posted at all? If you oppose what's going on, then do some constructive work to stop it, or to change it. Posting violent, insulting, meaningless drivel to soc.culture.jewish is just about the most counterproductive thing you could possibly do.
If you want to make a political difference, grow up. If you don't, just go away.
<MC> -- ---------------------- Mark Craig Carroll: <MC> ------------------------ ------ U of Del. Grad Student in CIS ------ EE/CIS LabStaff Hacker ------ -- Resident Wierdo @ 105 E Cleveland Ave, Newark DE - carr...@udel.edu -- ---------------------- Shalom Achshav - Peace NOW! ----------------------
In article <1991Feb17.195819.20...@lynx.CS.ORST.EDU> na...@mist.CS.ORST.EDU (Abdenacer Moussaoui C.) writes:
[Visciously Anti-Semitic Poetry Deleted]
>Copyright 1990 Joseph C. Shepherd
UGH! What a horrible bit of Anti-Semitism you have just spewed!
I think you ought to take a long walk and cool off.
You aren't being helpful by spreading lies.
I'm quite serious.
Howard Levene -- Howard B. Levene | "If there's nothing wrong with me, then there disclaimer, | must be something wrong with the universe!" datclaimer. | -- Dr. Beverly Crusher, ST:TNG hlev...@eniac.seas.upenn.edu | Data is a Mechanical Engineer, too.
I'll buy most of the argument. But that hardly qualifies as nazification. The ethic is all wrong. Nazism is feeding hate, and hate always ends up turning in on itself. Besides, terrorist operations in this country are extremely dangerous...unless of course you make the people think the leaders are capable of handling it.
In <1991Feb17.195430.20...@lynx.CS.ORST.EDU> na...@mist.CS.ORST.EDU (Abdenacer Moussaoui C.) writes:
> George Bush's Nazi Regime >George Bush's whole administration has all the earmarks of a >well prepared nazi-type regime! They are working on it >tooth and claw! The only thing they need now is an internal >terrorist threat, or civil disorder growing from anti-war >protests to justify declaring a National Emergency with its >legally sanctioned suspension of Constitutionally protected >rights.
Be realistic. Firstly, your beliefs that President Bush and the Congress are attempting to instill a pseudo-Nazi regime aren't enough to convince most people, myself included, that they actually are. The mere fact that someone >could< do something, much as President Bush
>could< suspend constitutional rights under certain circumstances
means neiher that he will or that he wants to do so. Do you have any hard evidence that the Bush administration is working on it 'tooth and claw?' I'd be most interested to see it.
Also, I haven't noticed any of the protesters 'round my neck of the woods being dispersed by officials simply because they were protesting.
> Concentration camps for hard-core anti-war >activists will be supported by the stupidity silent majority >with their brainless, moronic, imbecilic, blind and bigoted >moral retardation.
Hold on. I've been a silent observer in this group for some time, but I'm in the majority, as far as nationwide polls are concerned. I think that makes me a member of the silent majority. Kindly take your attacks on those who have differing opinions off the net. They have little place on a network which is supposed to promote discussion.
> Hence idiotic flag-waving becomes a >substitute for rational analysis, and Jerry Falwell Bible >Thumping a means of conditioning the rah rah war crowd to >perceive anti-war protestors as low-life scum and traitors >who need to be locked up or shot by loyal,
I can't speak for anyone in particular except myself, but I'd wager that the majority of people who support this war support it because they've actually thought about it. Probably a lot more than you give them credit for. I also doubt that 'Jerry Falwell Bible Thumping' has had that much of an effect on peoples' opinions of the war, and war protestors.
I also know that most of the supporters of the action in the Gulf that I associate with do _not_ advocate the removal of any fundamental rights of the protestors, nor do they regard them as scum who need to be shot or locked up.
> awesomely >patriotic volunteers like Marino Sicki of Arch-hate-a, >Calif. who has publicly proclaimed his desire to kill >protestors.
Hey, I read about this in my argumentative writing class! This is called reasoning by induction-- namely, you latch on to specific examples of a supporter, and graft his attitudes on to all the protesters. I hate to be the one to burst your bubble, but this sort of logic doesn't prove anything at all. You cannot tell me that all supporters are like this individual, because I know otherwise. You
>might< be able to convince me that the majority of supporters
resemble this individual, but you'd need a lot more data. Come on back and give it another try, when you get some information.
>So I have a feeling that by this Spring civil unrest and >economic turmoil will exacerbate domestic problems >sufficiently to permit administrative type detention >policies to be implemented by the Tyrant Bush with the >complete support of all war-loving red, white, and blue >American zombies.
Name calling, name calling. Try to avoid it-- its a waste of your time, my time, and the time of everyone who doesn't automatically skip your postings.
Also, your feeling about anything does little to convince me of anything. Try to provide _evidence._ Evidence like the healthy American stock markets, and falling oil prices. Oh, that doesn't support your 'feeling,' so it isn't mentioned. I'll admit, we may be falling into recession, but that was happening before this situation arose.
> This demented hard-hat mental disease was >prevalent during the Vietnam war era and those that don't >learn from history eventually get a rude awakening.
During the Vietnam War, many people didn't agree with the actions then being taken. If we really weren't thinking, don't you think that we would simply have kept _that_ mindset, rather than get a new one?
> The >economy is going to be so bad: the whole situation is going >to be so bad; more oppressive measures will be imposed. >They're already establishing special camps for those deemed >a threat to national determination of your subversive >potential rather than on any overt acts you may have >committed.
Proof? Proof? Where aaaare you, proof?
>AMERICAN ARE THE MOST BLIND PEOPLE ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH. >Bush is taking a typical hard-line Hitlerian attitude. NO, >not unless they meet OUR terms. No give. No bending, >inflexible, brittle, and the reason is, we don't want to get >out the Persian Gulf!
No, the reason for not bending about the withdrawl is that President Hussein has no right to be in Kuwait. The reason for not bending about President Hussein's vaunted 'linkage' is, quite simply, we would like to send the message out that blackmail of this sort is not acceptable.
> We can't get out or our economy will >collapse, especially right now, as bad as things are. >Usually presidents use War as a remedy for a Depression. >They certainly won't get us out of a war already in progress >that's barely keeping our heads above water to keep us from >going into a full-scale Depression!
Actually, war is only good for the economy on a short term scale. I'm sure that President Bush knows this. He certainly knows more about that situation and all of its facets, than either one of us.
> SO THEY'RE SURE AS HELL >NOT GOING TO GET US OUT OF THIS WAR! THEY WILL LIE AND LIE >AND LIE AND THEN WRAP THEMSELVES IN THE FLAG WHILE THEY ARE >A LIVING DISGRACE TO EVERYTHING NOBLE AND HONORABLE.
Take your finger off the caps lock key. We're not deaf, and you're not using an Apple II. Also, as I've said before, try and provide evidence every once in a while. It lends credence. How long do you really think the administration could lie about things with the network news organizations pouncing all over it, like a cat on a mouse? News _would_ get out.
> Why >all this sudden desperate show of Americanism? "We are >AMERICANS. This is our swastika. Everywhere the swastikas >are flying to show that they're a red-blooded, red-white-and >blue American.
Maybe (gasp) people thought about the situation, thought about the ramifactions, and reached different conclusions than you...! Maybe they're legitimately proud of what we're doing. Nah. Can't be. They disagree with you, thus they must all be idiots.
> The rest of you are radicals, traitors, >hippies, disloyal communists, and whatnot, subhuman scum, >etc. and we're gonna wipe you out!"
Bah! Gerard Vignes may think like this. The individual you cited above may think like this. That's not even a good case of inductive logic considering we live in a nation of 250 million. Not that inductive logic counts for much of anything, in and of itself.
>Joseph Shepherd
-- John S. Novak, III darkn...@buhub.bradley.edu "I don't have an employer not to speak for. I'm unemployed..."
I can't believe that some anti-Semitic S.O.B. would actually post such trash and such a blatant anti-Semitic article to any newsgroup, let along soc.culture.jewish.
All this confirms is that anti-Semitism is alive and well, and there are anti-Semites who are not ashamed to openly show it.
Let's face it: our enemy is not the Jew who insists that a child whose father is Jewish is Jewish because the Reform Rabbi said so, it is not the person who insists that the child of a women converted through the Reform or Conservative movements is just as much a Jew as anyone else, it is not the person who insists that swordfish and sturgeon are Kosher; no, our REAL ENEMIES are the people who are not ashamed to display their hatred of us, simply because of our personal religious beliefs. -- Stan Krieger All opinions, advice, or suggestions, even AT&T UNIX System Laboratories if related to my employment, are my own and Summit, NJ do not represent any public or private att!attunix!smk policies of my employer.
Point One: Once the nazi analgoies start, the subject has been on the net too long or the person who posted it probably needs help.
Point Two: What absolute garbage. Your propaganistic methods will only fool the "blind americans" you refer to.
Point Three: Get a clue, get a life, get another clue. This is not Vietnam. I know you might like to go back and live in that time when some (many, even) would agree with you, but you can't.
Point Four: If you're gonna disagree with what goes on, say it in a coherent manner. Bullshit only begats bullshit.
-Chris Restifo c...@andrew.cmu.edu *************************************************************************** **** Defender of Truth, Justice, The American Way, Chocolate Ice Cream, Pornographic Materials, SEX, Steeler Games, Nuclear Submarines, Tomahawk Cruise Missiles, Trident (I and II) Missiles, Twizzlers, The Eagles, Sting, Back-Tickling, Sleep, and The Right To Geek
"Ain't a day goes by that when I don't suck rubber, I ain't happy......."
Anything "politically incorrect" was probably subconsciously implanted in me by evil white, heterosexual males. Disclaimer: One who disclaims. All opinions copywrite 1991, CMR Inc. (ie--MINE) *************************************************************************** ****
about a 'bigoted poem' by (Abdenacer Moussaoui C.)
> I wonder if the name "Abdenacer Moussaoui C." is just a gohst name >for one of Schmidling, Kolling, etc. > Was Hitler a poet?
No, he was just a lousy painter. But he did use methods similar to those of David Makowsky later as a dictator, i.e. finger pointing at People or groups he had targetted without any basis for his accusations of course.
> George Bush's Nazi Regime >George Bush's whole administration has all the earmarks of a >well prepared nazi-type regime! They are working on it >tooth and claw! The only thing they need now is an internal >terrorist threat, or civil disorder growing from anti-war >protests to justify declaring a National Emergency with its >protests to justify declaring a National Emergency with its >legally sanctioned suspension of Constitutionally protected >rights. Concentration camps for hard-core anti-war >activists will be supported by the stupidity silent majority >with their brainless, moronic, imbecilic, blind and bigoted >moral retardation. Hence idiotic flag-waving becomes a >substitute for rational analysis, and Jerry Falwell Bible >Thumping a means of conditioning the rah rah war crowd to >perceive anti-war protestors as low-life scum and traitors >who need to be locked up or shot by loyal, awesomely >patriotic volunteers like Marino Sicki of Arch-hate-a, >Calif. who has publicly proclaimed his desire to kill >protestors.
In article <8bjjfRW00Vo94Ua...@andrew.cmu.edu>, gh...@andrew.cmu.edu (Gaurang Hirpara) writes...
>I'll buy most of the argument. But that hardly qualifies as nazification. >The ethic is all wrong. Nazism is feeding hate, and hate always ends up >turning in on itself. Besides, terrorist operations in this country are >extremely dangerous...unless of course you make the people think the >leaders are capable of handling it.
>my $.02
>--dan
Will you please take your $.02 out of soc.culture.jewish?
#about a 'bigoted poem' by #(Abdenacer Moussaoui C.)
#> I wonder if the name "Abdenacer Moussaoui C." is just a gohst name #>for one of Schmidling, Kolling, etc. #> Was Hitler a poet?
#No, he was just a lousy painter. But he did use methods similar to those #of David Makowsky later as a dictator, i.e. finger pointing at People or #groups he had targetted without any basis for his accusations of #course.
Three points. First of all, I noticed that you replied to my article, and not the article I was replying to. Considering the contents of the article I was replying to, what does that say about Eric?
Next point. How am I "finger pointing at People or groups he [I - dlm] had targetted without any basis for his [my - dlm] accusations of course"?
And last but not least. Me, a dictator? Do you know something I don't know? Boy do I wish you are right!
The truth is, we don't need a Nazi regime in America. Conformity and doctrinnaire thinking are already conveniently widespread. Instituting a repressive regime would only disturb the current balance of interests that results in 25% voter turnouts and the election of an Eternal Congress and its unified War Party platform. Things couldn't be better for those in power. One doesn't need to dwell on coups that are unnecessary.
makow...@ENUXHA.EAS.ASU.EDU (David Makowsky) writes: >In a@uchicago (Eric Jacquier) writes: >#makow...@ENUXHA.EAS.ASU.EDU (David Makowsky) writes: >#about a 'bigoted poem' by >#(Abdenacer Moussaoui C.) >#> I wonder if the name "Abdenacer Moussaoui C." is just a gohst name >#>for one of Schmidling, Kolling, etc. >#> Was Hitler a poet? >#No, he was just a lousy painter. But he did use methods similar to those >#of David Makowsky later as a dictator, i.e. finger pointing at People or >#groups he had targetted without any basis for his accusations of >#course. > Three points. First of all, I noticed that you replied to my article, >and not the article I was replying to. Considering the contents of the article >I was replying to, what does that say about Eric?
Nothing, it says nothing about "Eric" If you want to know I think the "poem" stinks. That's why I did not dispute your "bigotted poem" qualifier. The point I chose to make was about your methods of bringing the names of posters on this net and associated them to this "poem". I will note that you did not either decide to do a detailed analysis of the poem, why should I have to, before Mr Makowsky decides that i am allowed to make a valid point.
> Next point. How am I "finger pointing at People or groups he [I - dlm] >had targetted without any basis for his [my - dlm] accusations of course"?
ummmm! You have me puzzled! Are you for real? Maybe YOU wrote that poem after all! See, this is an example of using your method.
> And last but not least. Me, a dictator?
No, I just found some similarities between your approach and that of the person whose disgusting name you brought up by associating it with people who post on this network. The mediocrity of your attitude alone won't make you a dictator, don't get all excited.
Ok, now just don't bother elaborating on my ramblings, I won't read you anylonger and waste bandwidth by arguing with you. I probably have done too much of both
In article <1991Feb17.195819.20...@lynx.CS.ORST.EDU> na...@mist.CS.ORST.EDU (Abdenacer Moussaoui C.) writes:
> The Palestinian Revolt: WHY?
alot of bull about the Jews.....
>They murdered, bombed and plundered >Stole the Arab's land with glee >Saying, "2,000 years ago we lived here >It used to be our property"!
more bull about the Jews.........
>Copyright 1990 Joseph C. Shepherd
Let me say that my mother is a 5th generation in the old city of Jerusalem. And non of your CRAP about Jews taking land from "peaceful" Palestinians is the cause of Palestinians revolt.
In article na...@mist.CS.ORST.EDU (Abdenacer Moussaoui C.) writes:
| George Bush's Nazi Regime
What has this guy been smoking?
| Concentration camps for hard-core anti-war | activists will be supported by the stupidity silent majority | with their brainless, moronic, imbecilic, blind and bigoted | moral retardation.
I would suggest that most of the adjectives are examples of psycological projection.
| perceive anti-war protestors as low-life scum and traitors | who need to be locked up or shot by loyal,
Why shoot them? After all, they are *amusing* low-life scum.
| The economy is going to be so bad:
That must explain why the stock market is surging.
| WRAP THEMSELVES IN THE FLAG WHILE THEY ARE | A LIVING DISGRACE TO EVERYTHING NOBLE AND HONORABLE. | Joseph Shepherd
Far from being a disgrace, I think this is one of the finest moments in american history.
------------------------- My comments are my own. They are independent and unrelated to the views of my company , relatives or elected representatives.
In article <1991Feb17.195819.20...@lynx.CS.ORST.EDU> na...@mist.CS.ORST.EDU (Abdenacer Moussaoui C.) writes:
> The Palestinian Revolt: WHY?
> [ much bad poetry deleted. highlights follow ]
>The wealth and power of world Jewry was then
^^^^^^^^^^^
>Where jewish jets dropped fire-ball bombs ^^^^^^^^^^^ >And jewish soldiers butchered children as Cain
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>American Jewish leaders and their bought politician ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >In the Jewish occupied places the Arabs had to rebel ^^^^^^ >demonstration too powerful for Jewish tyrants to quell.
^^^^^^
Not Israeli. Jewish. That makes this drivel anti-semitic, not political expression. It's the rich Jews the world over that are the problem. The old lies are still the best.
>Like King Herod killed the babies under two years
You left out the part where we killed Christ. And murder children to make the Passover Matzohs.
>Copyright 1990 Joseph C. Shepherd
No need to copyright it: your verse stinks. Take my advice, stick to prose.
Ronnie --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Ronnie B. Kon | k...@groundfog.stanford.edu | "I like that everyone becomes food." ...!{decwrl,ames}!mindcrf!ronnie | -- Hobbes --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
In article <1991Feb18.152310.28...@src.dec.com> koll...@wse.dec.com writes: >> In article <1991Feb17.195819.20...@lynx.CS.ORST.EDU> >na...@mist.CS.ORST.EDU (Abdenacer Moussaoui C.) writes:
>> The Palestinian Revolt: WHY?
>The poem as written is antisemitic, since it blames Jews for the >actions of Zionists. Clearly, not all Jews are Zionists.
Thanks for the backhanded defence. But why is this "clear" to you? Is it because you can't imagine all Jews being despicable Zionists? Note how Karen chooses her wording above. "As written". But in principle the general idea is valid. Notwithstanding the fact that the vast majority of Jews have some Zionist sympathies, Karen issues her monthly self-exculpatory pronouncement, naively believing that her slate is now clean for her standard anti-semitic drivel. The answer lies in PO Box in Texas.
In article <1991Feb17.225758.22...@cbnewsl.att.com>, st...@cbnewsl.att.com (Stan Krieger) writes:
> Let's face it: our enemy is not the Jew who insists that a child > whose father is Jewish is Jewish because the Reform Rabbi said so, > it is not the person who insists that the child of a women converted > through the Reform or Conservative movements is just as much a Jew > as anyone else, it is not the person who insists that swordfish > and sturgeon are Kosher [...]
Nor is the enemy Messianic Jews, nor Christians who love Israel. There are plenty of genuine enemies of Jews and Israel without having to go around inventing more! Nuf Ced.
..And in the capital Shushan the Jews killed and destroyed five hundred men. And they killed Parshandata, Dalfon, Aspata, Porata, Adalya, Aridata, Parmashta, Arisai, Aridai and Vayzata, the ten sons of Haman ben Hamdata who terrorised the Jews...And the Jews of Shushan gathered again on the fourteenth of Adar, and killed three hundred men...And the other Jews in the King's cities gathered and fought for their lives, and enjoyed relief from their enemies, killing seventy-five thousand of them...For Haman ben Hamdata the Agagi, who terrorised all the Jews, thought that he would destroy the Jews, and cast a Pur, or lot, to confuse and destroy them...let his evil thought which he thought about the Jews rebound on his head, and they hanged him and his sons on a tree...And these days are remembered and memorial rituals performed in every generation by every Jewish family, in every city and town; and these days of Purim will never pass away from the Jews, and the memory will never leave their descendants. - Esther 9
Haman came to a sticky end, and so did Hitler, and I hope something happens to the author of the referenced article.
P.S. Now someone is going to accuse me of racism or something. Don't bother, you will only be showing your true colours. This is Judaism. If you are against this, then you are by definition antisemitic. -- Zev Sero - z...@bby.oz.au This I say unto you, be not sexist pigs. - The prophetess, Morgori Oestrydingh (S.Tepper)
> I wonder if the name "Abdenacer Moussaoui C." is just a gohst name >for one of Schmidling, Kolling, etc.
No, he seems to be from Corvallis, Oregon. But, his location signature keeps changing from BU, MASS to MIT, MASS, etc. His mail address seems to be Oregon State University, however.
mpos...@gpu.utcs.utoronto.ca (Eli Posner) writes: > In article <1991Feb18.152310.28...@src.dec.com> koll...@wse.dec.com writes: >>> In article <1991Feb17.195819.20...@lynx.CS.ORST.EDU> >>na...@mist.CS.ORST.EDU (Abdenacer Moussaoui C.) writes:
>>> The Palestinian Revolt: WHY?
>>The poem as written is antisemitic, since it blames Jews for the >>actions of Zionists. Clearly, not all Jews are Zionists.
> Thanks for the backhanded defence. But why is this "clear" to you? > Is it because you can't imagine all Jews being despicable Zionists? > Note how Karen chooses her wording above. "As written". But in > principle the general idea is valid. Notwithstanding the fact that > the vast majority of Jews have some Zionist sympathies, Karen issues > her monthly self-exculpatory pronouncement, naively believing that > her slate is now clean for her standard anti-semitic drivel. The > answer lies in PO Box in Texas.
> Eli Posner
I would like to add to this: Kolling's statement is verbatim EXACTLY what Malcom Ross of Moncton New Brunswick writes in his anti-semitic book. The method is to label as a "zionist conspiracy" just about everything Jewish, ascribe it with all sorts of horrendous lies and then retreat by saying "I don't mean all Jews - just the Zionists."
Of course, there are Jews who don't support Israel and are not in fact Zionists, but that is really not the issue.
|
