Newsgroups: alt.dbs.echostar.hack, comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.2600
From: Onideus Mad Hatter <mad_hat...@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:04:54 -0700
Local: Sun, Jun 20 2004 1:04 pm
Subject: Re: Internet Explorer can go take a flying fuck
On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 04:49:56 -0500, Norwegian Formula <R...@bastards.com> wrote: Duh huh huh...boy that was SURE funny! Apparently Norwegians have a very simplistic, almost >>> 1. Quit using FrontPage to design your pages >> Free cl00, Dipshit, the only two programs I use to make websites are Notepad >> and Paint Shop. > No wonder...you're still learning to just type. retarded based sense of humor. Just how fucking inbred ARE the Norwegians these days? >>> 2. Learn to code using accepted standards (http://www.w3.org/) Who asked you to translate my posts into the language of delusional stupid? And BTW that lil stint >>> (Or, do you not know how to write HTML/XML code?) >> Yes, let's all be ignorant fucking monkeys and follow the every whim of the >> W3C, despite the fact that they're pretty much full of shit half the time. > Interpretation: I'm a spoiled ass brat, my mommy and daddy said I can do >whatever I want, so nyah! Don't *ever* ask me to put up proof of anything I say >either! was more of my personal opinion, I have no want or need to "back it up" at this time (although I believe in the past I have on several occasions). >>>No, browsers either comply with accepted standards or they don't. (Guess A lovely backpedal on Johnyboi's behalf. I bet Johnboi is REALLY happy that he has a retarded >>>which browser doesn't. And, no, it's not the one with the spinning globe >>>and "e".) >> What was that? What did your dumbass just say? Tell Sunshine, which browser >> SPECIFICALLY are you >> referring to that you think conforms to ALL of the W3Cs "standards"? Come >> on, Bitch, don't >> hesitate now, I'm about to make you look REALLY stupid! Oh and uh...I'm >> REALLY going to enjoy it. `, ) > Interpretation: I have no clue how to answer that, so I'll act like billy >badass again and pitch a fit...my mommy and daddy said I could! Norwegian like you to think of lame, tail chasing comebacks for him....still, I was sorta hoping one of you might actually be stupid enough to stick with the original claim...which was that non IE browsers follow W3C standards EXACTLY...cause ya know, then I was gonna start posting examples like...oh this: http://www.opera.com/docs/specs/?session= Opera version 7 supports HTML 4.01 with these exceptions: The alink property of the body element is not supported ^_^ Oh yeah, that's following "standards" alright. I win, you lose...but then, what else is new? >>>FWIW, IE is about as functional as your newsreader. (Hint: Set your lines ...yeah pretty much. But then, I fucking THINK, so I can. >>>to wrap at 76 characters.) >> My news reader has a default line setting of 76, I purposefully altered >> it...no real particular >> reason other than give people like you something to bitch about. > Interpretation: See...I do things how *I* want to... >standards and anything else be damned! Isn't the hypocrisy of these tards just AMAZING? I mean they babble on and on and fucking ON about how "standards" are so important, how "standards" make the world go round...and yet they're the ones who are support NON STANDARD BROWSERS. I mean, even in that one article that you MORONS posted in your defense is CLEARLY states that Internet Explorer is in use by NINETY PERCENT of the web populous. Now last I checked, that figure would uh, sorta make Internet Explorer the de facto STANDARD web browser, now wouldn't it? Oh, oh, backpedal now...and hey, do a REALLY shitty job of it too, retard. `, ) > In other words, I'm a real fuck up, but have my mommy and daddy You seem awfully fixated on my "mommy and daddy", what did you grow up in an orphanage and you're >to say it's okay and make me feel better about it. using my posts to relieve pent up frustration and anger? Are you a repressed Norwegian tweenage angsty goth? Hrmmm? Would you like to tell that mean 'ol Mad Hatter about it? Come on, Sunshine, tell us all about how you're REALLY feeling. >> Coincidentally it looks just fine Actually I found my monitor sitting out beside a garbage can. The brightness control was broken, so >> on my end...of course I'm using a 17 inch monitor and a res of 1024x768. > Interpretation: Mommy and daddy get me whatever I want, and they say I can >pretend to be a braggart of some kind if I think I can get away with it or if I >think it actually means anything. I fixed it and VIOLA, Hatter has a new monitor! I stopped relying on my parents a LONG time ago, Little One, but then, you're obviously still in high school so I don't imagine you have any understanding of what that's actually like. >> Maybe you should upgrade? Or maybe I should REALLY give you something to bitch Plonk me, eh? *snicker* You must not frequent many binary groups. ^_^ >> about and start putting a .sig delimiter at the >> very top of each post I make. He, he, he...your God do I love being evil. > Interpretation: My daddy's got more money than your daddy, nyah! I'll show >all you people what it takes to be a real idiot and have the world plonk me. >So what if I'll be replying to myself from then on...at least I'll still have a 17 Yes, cause gosh knows I'm in SUCH short supply of replies from dribbling little clusterfucks like >inch monitor! So there! Nyah! yourself. OH NO, PLEASE, whatever you do, don't stop reading my post and SHUTTING THE FUCK UP, cause GOSH, what a bother THAT would be...*snicker*...see, everything goes better with sarcasm. >> http://www.backwater-productions.net OMG WTF ROFLCOPTER! > BWAHAAHAHAAAHAHA! > Those just from your 'Products' page! LMAO! *checks the sites in IE and in Netscape* Hrmmm, well for some reason they seem to display just fine, I guess the W3C is full of shit. Hey, >There's hardly anything to the page, and yet you had to show somebody you can make frames with scroll bars!? Wow, I had no idea that frames with scroll bars was so...amusing...I guess it's a "Norwegian" thing. >ROFLMAO! *shrugs* > You're right...fuck standards. Why have them when you can fuck things up so You ignore standards by not using and supporting Internet Explorer. Even further, my sites display >easily all by yourself anyway. perfectly in Internet Explorer despite the HUGE list of "errors" found by the W3C...so uh, I guess that sorta proves just how full of shit the W3C is, doesn't it? I mean if the "standards" set by the W3C were *SO* important...how come people can view them just fine? >LMAO! OMG WTF LOLLERSKATES!!1! Doesn't take much to entertain a retarded Norwegian I guess. >Hopefully your mommy and daddy didn't pay Junior is all like, "BLAH BLAH MOMMY AND DADDY BLAH BLAH BLAH EXCLAMATION POINT!" >some college somewhere to teach you your webpage making skills, because if they >did, they should be suing the school for incompetence, or slapping your happy >ass around for wasting their money! >Hell boy, you offer 'anime music video(s)' for downloads!? PMSL! And what's wrong with my AMVs, Sunshine? Other than the fact that you probably don't even KNOW what AMVs are. I know you didn't actually WATCH any of them, cause let's face it, you're too fuckin retarded to even KNOW how to instal an MPEG-2 codec on your system. > For fucks sake, if some poor slob had only a text only browser or was stuck at ...and that's a bad thing? Apparently this retards idea of a perfect site is just a couple >some job where that's all s/he could use, they'd get absolutely *nothing* from >your site. LMAO! paragraphs of text...or maybe that's all his bullshit "standards" will allow before it starts popping up with errors. `, ) -- Onideus Mad Hatter You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||