If Women Ruled the World
Penis Power
I’m converted. Go feminism!
socialist that fear the truth but want to give up all their rights
"Penis Power" <penisp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cdf9025e-297f-470c...@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>If women ruled the world, men would stay at home and raise the kids.
>I�m converted. Go feminism!
The only problem is, it would never happen.... as feminist wouldn't have
anything to cry about, or they wouldn't be able to cry about child support,
funding off government and and cry about violence issues, or hoodwink the
courts and governments to do their bidding while they shove a stick up your
ass...Yes just think, your socilaist world would be such a wonderful idea
and place if feminsit were not around in the first place....but as it is the
extermist man hating feminazis ruling over your kids and making you a
slave...while you bow down to their greatness...
Roy
up all their rights"
<.....Obama.the..saviour....@whitehouse,New.World.Order.UN.Global>
wrote:
> "Penis Power" <penispower...@gmail.com> wrote in message
==
Mark...Why do you hate women so much? Wasn't your mother a women? Did
you hate her too? Did she dominate you and make you eat your broccoli?
Did she make you put on clean clothes when you wanted to wear the same
shit-filled shorts for one more day? Did she laugh at you when you
fell down and scraped your knee? Did she tell you to grow up and be a
MAN, and you didn't want to do that?
==
socialist that fear the truth but want to give up all their rights
"Roy" <wil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:18c122bd-2b34-4bbb...@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
On Oct 29, 11:51 am, "socialist that fear the truth but want to give
up all their rights"
<.....Obama.the..saviour....@whitehouse,New.World.Order.UN.Global>
wrote:
> "Penis Power" <penispower...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:cdf9025e-297f-470c...@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>
> >If women ruled the world, men would stay at home and raise the kids.
> >I�m converted. Go feminism!
>
> The only problem is, it would never happen.... as feminist wouldn't have
> anything to cry about, or they wouldn't be able to cry about child
support,
> funding off government and and cry about violence issues, or hoodwink the
> courts and governments to do their bidding while they shove a stick up
your
> ass...Yes just think, your socilaist world would be such a wonderful idea
> and place if feminsit were not around in the first place....but as it is
the
> extermist man hating feminazis ruling over your kids and making you a
> slave...while you bow down to their greatness...
>Mark...Why do you hate women so much?
Women are lovely Roy, and don't hate women, like you do when, your wife
fucked you up the ass and walk out on you and later died of a deadly
disease, because she was working the streets, just like you do now retard.
Feminazis are not real women, they hate decent women, they hate men and boys
and really hate retards like you Roy, while they shove your face in the dirt
and keep on kicking you when your down.....
A good example is that those feminazi's use lies, use fake studies, which
roy was proved in a court of law, but then you wouldn't know about that
either, being as retarded as you are...So roy, if my sarcism bothers and
hurts your felling, just learn to get over it you kook..... maybe you should
get a life and stop pretending you loved your wife, as she hated your
guts...now fuck off you silly little blue smurf....
Lou Ravi
> "Roy" <wil...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:18c122bd-2b34-4bbb...@x25g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 29, 11:51 am, "socialist that fear the truth but want to give
> up all their rights"
> <.....Obama.the..saviour....@whitehouse,New.World.Order.UN.Global>
> wrote:
>> "Penis Power" <penispower...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:cdf9025e-297f-470c...@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> If women ruled the world, men would stay at home and raise the kids.
>>> I�m converted. Go feminism!
>>
>> The only problem is, it would never happen.... as feminist wouldn't
>> have anything to cry about, or they wouldn't be able to cry about
>> child support, funding off government and and cry about violence
>> issues, or hoodwink the courts and governments to do their bidding
>> while they shove a stick up your ass...Yes just think, your
>> socilaist world would be such a wonderful idea and place if feminsit
>> were not around in the first place....but as it is the extermist man
>> hating feminazis ruling over your kids and making you a
>> slave...while you bow down to their greatness...
>
>> Mark...Why do you hate women so much?
>
> Women are lovely Roy, and don't hate women, like you do when, your
> wife fucked you up the ass and walk out on you and later died of a
> deadly disease, because she was working the streets, just like you do
> now retard.
Jesus fucking wept. How old are you sonny?
klunk
"socialist that fear the truth but want to give up all their rights"
<.....Obama.the..saviour....@whitehouse,New.World.Order.UN.Global> wrote in
message news:wclGm.49791$Db2.12707@edtnps83...
lol... if that's true, then so is the converse... an idiotnazi like you
isn't a real man either.... ;-)
socialist that fear the truth but want to give up all their rights
"Lou Ravi" <j.mu...@libertysurf.fr> wrote in message
news:4ae9e25c$0$907$ba4a...@news.orange.fr...
holy jumping white niggers, how anal are you girly...
>
>
socialist that fear the truth but want to give up all their rights
<ROY STATED> >Mark...Why do you hate women so much?
Women are lovely creatures Roy, and I don't hate women, like you do, when
your wife fucked you up the ass and walk out on you and later died of a
deadly disease, because she was working the streets, just like you do now
retard.
Feminazis are not real women, they hate decent women who love men and their
children, and they hate men and boys and really hate retards like you Roy,
while they shove your face in the dirt and keep on kicking you when your
down.....
A good example is that those feminazi's use lies, use fake studies, which
roy was proved in a court of law, but then you wouldn't know about that
either, being as you are retarded, as you are...So Roy, if my sarcism
bothers and hurts your feelings, just learn to get over it, you kook.....
maybe you should get a life and stop pretending you loved your wife, as she
hated your guts...now fuck off you silly little blue smurf....
> Jesus fucking wept. How old are you sonny?
How anal are you sonny jin.....lets face it, you socilaist wankers all want
to be smurfs while being lied to to make you all feel safe and warm while
ignoring the facts that you all fear so much, so being nice doesn't cut it
to police state moron's, who think screwing over people lives with outdated
feminazi lies and propaganda used to beat people over the head and place in
the laws of the country when it's proven it only used to generate more money
off the sheep....go back to sleep ....
Lee
"Penis Power" <penisp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cdf9025e-297f-470c...@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
If women ruled the world, men would stay at home and raise the kids.
I�m converted. Go feminism!
----------------
I am not so sure after watching Germaine Greer gobble down bulls
testicles on the Heston Blumenthal medieval cooking program a couple of
nights ago the other guest had trouble stopping the woman from eating
the inedible parts in her haste to consume beast balls like some kind of
crack addict.
It is certainly to be hoped that this carniverous woman is not a role
model for all feminists.
socialist that fear the truth but want to give up all their rights
"Lee" <ahhhhg!@127.0.0.1.com> wrote in message
news:2IoGm.32717$fq2....@newsfe18.ams2...
Then you saw a feminazi in action...
>
>
>
Marcus Aurelius
> If women ruled the world, men would stay at home and raise the kids.
> I’m converted. Go feminism!
The following, in rebuttal to the original post, is the URL of an
essay by Thomas Pollock, "The Feminist Totalitarian State", with which
I agree completely:
http://menstribune.com/feminist.htm
"Jurisprudence” by James Mill: To be sure, hard words are the only
instruments of tyranny which they have it in their power to employ.
They employ them, accordingly; and there is scarcely an epithet,
calculated to denote a vicious state of the intellectual, or moral
part, of the human mind, which they do not employ to excite an
unfavourable opinion of those who refuse subscription to their
articles of faith.
Lee
"socialist that fear the truth but want to give up all their rights"
wrote in message news:wRpGm.50756$PH1.36244@edtnps82...
Greer crashed onto the literary scene apparently bemoaning the lack of
testes on women and has since made a four decade long career biting down
hard on balls, unfortunately this deranged authoress has played on the
female trait of follow the pack and has led an extremely noble cause
began by suffragettes who laid down their lives in some cases and turned
it into a unpleasant joke headed by the likes of this elderly woman
knawing savagely on bulls testicles followed in main by a pack of
ladettes getting pissed in the street and staggering along vomiting with
their pants around their ankles.
Precisely the sort of behaviour that the original feminist complained
about so bitterly of their male partners.
A revolution that makes things worse is not much good.
socialist that fear the truth but want to give up all their rights
While there cause made some difference like the right for women to vote and
so they should....it all wasted space now as even women's children (boys)
suffer at their hands, and why would a mother who is a feminist, want to
harm their own child with sick anmd demended feminazi policy. Sad really
when you think about it as most women today are not feminists any more and
have seen what this movement has become...
>
>
>
Lou Ravi
wrote:
> holy jumping white niggers, how anal are you girly...
I was right to ask the question but unfortunately did not get an answer.
12 or so I assume. Anyway, bye
PLONK
I don't have time to talk to spotty youths without brains, sorry.
Topaz
Goebbels speech on March 18, 1933:
"German women, German men !
It is a happy accident that my first speech since taking charge of the
Ministry for Propaganda and People's Enlightenment is to German women.
Although I agree with Treitschke that men make history, I do not
forget that women raise boys to manhood. You know that the National
Socialist movement is the only party that keeps women out of daily
politics. This arouses bitter criticism and hostility, all of it very
unjustified. We have kept women out of the parliamentary-democratic
intrigues of the past fourteen years in Germany not because we do not
respect them, but because we respect them too much. We do not see the
woman as inferior, rather as having a different mission, a different
value, than that of the man. Therefore we believed that the German
woman, who more than any other in the world is a woman in the best
sense of the word, should use her strength and abilities in other
areas than the man.
The woman has always been not only the man's sexual companion, but
also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in
the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices
and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best
suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless
devotion, her readiness to sacrifice.
The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the
past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea
of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and bread
winning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the
man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is
not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her
talents and abilities.
Looking back over the past year's of Germany's decline, we come to the
frightening, nearly terrifying conclusion, that the less German men
were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to
the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men
always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all
great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness and determination
have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually
loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the
woman.
It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must
be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our
attitude toward women.
The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in
government, politics, economics and social relations has not left
women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought
impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some
good, noble and commendable things have happened. But also things that
are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations
have largely taken from women their proper tasks. Their eyes were set
in directions that were not appropriate for them. The result was a
distorted public view of German womanhood that had nothing to do with
former ideals.
A fundamental change is necessary. At the risk of sounding reactionary
and outdated, let me say this clearly: The first, best, and most
suitable place for the women is in the family, and her most glorious
duty is to give children to her people and nation, children who can
continue the line of generations and who guarantee the immortality of
the nation. The woman is the teacher of the youth, and therefore the
builder of the foundation of the future. If the family is the nation's
source of strength, the woman is its core and center. The best place
for the woman to serve her people is in her marriage, in the family,
in motherhood. This is her highest mission. That does not mean that
those women who are employed or who have no children have no role in
the motherhood of the German people. They use their strength, their
abilities, their sense of responsibility for the nation, in other
ways. We are convinced, however, that the first task of a socially
reformed nation must be to again give the woman the possibility to
fulfill her real task, her mission in the family and as a mother.
The national revolutionary government is everything but reactionary.
It does not want to stop the pace of our rapidly moving age. It has no
intention of lagging behind the times. It wants to be the flag bearer
and pathfinder of the future. We know the demands of the modern age.
But that does not stop us from seeing that every age has its roots in
motherhood, that there is nothing of greater importance than the
living mother of a family who gives the state children.
German women have been transformed in recent years. They are beginning
to see that they are not happier as a result of being given more
rights but fewer duties. They now realize that the right to be elected
to public office at the expense of the right to life, motherhood and
her daily bread is not a good trade.
A characteristic of the modern era is a rapidly declining birthrate in
our big cities. In 1900 two million babies were born in Germany. Now
the number has fallen to one million. This drastic decline is most
evident in the national capital. In the last fourteen years, Berlin's
birthrate has become the lowest of any European city. By 1955, without
emigration, it will have only about three million inhabitants. The
government is determined to halt this decline of the family and the
resulting impoverishment of our blood. There must be a fundamental
change. The liberal attitude toward the family and the child is
responsible for Germany's rapid decline. We today must begin worrying
about an aging population. In 1900 there were seven children for each
elderly person, today it is only four. If current trends continue, by
1988 the ratio will be 1 : 1. These statistics say it all. They are
the best proof that if Germany continues along its current path, it
will end in an abyss with breathtaking speed. We can almost determine
the decade when Germany collapses because of depopulation.
We are not willing to stand aside and watch the collapse of our
national life and the destruction of the blood we have inherited. The
national revolutionary government has the duty to rebuilt the nation
on its original foundations, to transform the life and work of the
woman so that it once again best serves the national good. It intends
to eliminate the social inequalities so that once again the life of
our people and the future of our people and the immortality of our
blood is assured..."
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
Nick 'my dad (correction) didnt fly spitfires' Griffin
> If women ruled the world, men would stay at home and raise the kids.
> I’m converted. Go feminism!
don't stop there....have the full conversion
socialist that fear the truth but want to give up all their rights
well good for you chimpy von goof. One less kook to deal with.
>
>
Moderator
Amazing how much sense that makes. It doesn't appear to be propoganda
but a heartfelt position backed up with some numbers and resounding
logic.
If understand correctly, there was a tremendous amount of "liberal"
policies floating around before the National Socialists gained power.
Given today's legislative insanity its no bloody wonder the pendulum
went so far the other way. I suspect it will happen again and perhaps
that's what the design is; a total collapse of the status quo and this
time the Anglo Saxons.
Duncan Patton a Campbell
to give up all their rights wrote:
> Feminazis are not real women, they hate decent women who love men and
> their children, and they hate men and boys and really hate retards like
> you Roy, while they shove your face in the dirt and keep on kicking you
> when your down.....
>
WooHooo. Put down that bottle, Mark.
It's stimulating the mad-cow prions or something.
Dhu
--
Duncan Patton a Campbell is Dhu
socialist that fear the truth but want to give up all their rights
"Duncan Patton a Campbell" <camp...@neotext.ca> wrote in message
news:pan.2009.10...@neotext.ca...
So when you had your balls cut off, you ran around and told feminazis you
suuport them now... didn't you duh....
sarge
I assume then you are against having a strong military since this is
what the National Socialists wanted.
Moderator
I don't support or reject positions because the Nazis supported or
rejected them. Your premise is ADL bait which I don't support. I can't
wait for your inflammatory response.
Topaz
<grease...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>I assume then you are against having a strong military since this is
>what the National Socialists wanted.
America is ruled by the Jews. The National Socialists didn't want the
Jews to have a strong military. America is always involved in the
Middle East because America is ruled by the Jews.
Here is a quote from an article by Julius Streicher in 1944:
Der St�rmer, #23/1944, What is Americanism
"The Jews have made America what it is today: a nation raped by the
Jews , a nation whose 130,000,000 people of many colors and races have
been forced into helping the Jews achieve world domination!"
ZerkonXXXX
> If women ruled the world, men would stay at home and raise the kids. I’m
> converted. Go feminism!
Ruled? If?
How much of the world is ruled by men and women in need or want of each
other?
This need rules the world of both.
Moderator
I'm not advocating. I'm demonstrating.
MCP
"Penis Power" <penisp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cdf9025e-297f-470c...@t11g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
I'm converted. Go feminism!
"If women ruled the world"
We would still be living in mud huts and cooking over an open fire....IF
fire was invented that is!