Re: FORSOOTH - PANGBORN IS A SOOTHSAYER
krp
"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e7aac4a7-a2d8-4bb8...@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
MY PREDICTION: Maureen would say or suggest it was a "FAKE."
MOE> The jpeg you sent me of his " honorable discharge" certificate was
MOE> interesting.
MOE> One that he used a camera to make the image, not scan it. And did it
MOE> slightly off, angle-wise. Wonder why he simply didn't scan it. It
MOE> would have been easier.
MOE> The font used for his name and date are also curious.
ON CUE - Maureen suggests it *IS* a fake! Golly - I must be "Carnack
the magnificent."
womanGoddess
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
I said it was curious, not that it was a fake.
Perhaps you ave difficulty in reading comprehension again.
All I said is that there are a few things in the jpeg you posted that
raise questions.
Kent's point about you redacting the rank is a good point.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
krp
> MY PREDICTION: Maureen would say or suggest it was a "FAKE."
>
> MOE> The jpeg you sent me of his " honorable discharge" certificate was
> MOE> interesting.
>
> MOE> One that he used a camera to make the image, not scan it. And did it
> MOE> slightly off, angle-wise. Wonder why he simply didn't scan it. It
> MOE> would have been easier.
>
> MOE> The font used for his name and date are also curious.
>
> ON CUE - Maureen suggests it *IS* a fake! Golly - I must be "Carnack
> the magnificent."
MOE> I said it was curious, not that it was a fake.
Oh SURE you endorse it as REAL, don't ya, Moe. All those comments were
PRAISE, weren't they?
womanGoddess
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Kennie, why should I praise you? Is that what you want? Praise?
After all the SHIT you've said about me and my father?
It LOOKS legit, BUT it is a photo not a scan. And it may be a copy
you made of the original, I dunno.
What I DO know is that " honorable discharge" could mean anything
from serving actually with honor to serving without getting your ass
in court martial type trouble.
I never said you never served in the first place. What I question is
your claims ABOUT your service.
, But if you want praise from me, you can go to hell, shit boy.
Dan Sullivan
"krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4b1ed8fe$0$4973$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
In the YEARS you've been posting on asCPS, ken pangborn, I've yet to see a
single client of yours post their thanks for how you helped them prevail
against CPS or any person or in ANY court of law.
Greegor
DJS3 > ken pangborn, I've yet to see a single client
DJS3 > of yours post their thanks for how you helped
DJS3 > them prevail against CPS or any person or
DJS3 > in ANY court of law.
Moe says Ken is begging for praise
Dan says no past customers ever posted praise
How many praises for ANYBODY do you
see in usenet, Dan, and how many of those
are the principal themself using a sock or a shill?
" Pangborn begging for praise "
35 womanGoddess Dec 8
" In the YEARS you've been posting on asCPS, ken
pangborn, I've yet to see a single client of yours post
their thanks for how you helped them prevail against
CPS or any person or in ANY court of law. "
36 Dan Sullivan Dec 8
Kent Wills
There's a reason Ken brags about the whole ONE client he's had
that won.
"you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team claiming in misc.legal
that David Moore can
and does edit Google's Usenet archive.
Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
Kent Wills
wrote:
>DJS3 > In the YEARS you've been posting on asCPS,
>DJS3 > ken pangborn, I've yet to see a single client
>DJS3 > of yours post their thanks for how you helped
>DJS3 > them prevail against CPS or any person or
>DJS3 > in ANY court of law.
>
>Moe says Ken is begging for praise
He was and is.
>Dan says no past customers ever posted praise
None have.
>
>How many praises for ANYBODY do you
>see in usenet,
Just yesterday you said I'm appealing. Of course, given your
psychological NEED to lie, your praise may not be as flattering as you
made it appear.
>Dan, and how many of those
>are the principal themself using a sock or a shill?
None would be my guess. You're free to prove there is a higher
number if you can.
>
>
>" Pangborn begging for praise "
>35 womanGoddess Dec 8
>
>" In the YEARS you've been posting on asCPS, ken
>pangborn, I've yet to see a single client of yours post
>their thanks for how you helped them prevail against
>CPS or any person or in ANY court of law. "
>36 Dan Sullivan Dec 8
You seem to think proving someone wrote that which they have
never denied writing means something. Maybe within your drug addled
mind this is a win, but to those of us NOT under the influence of
anything stronger than spring water, it means nothing.
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (either directly or through the same standards he
DEMANDS be held to others):
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
As of Sunday, Nov. 29, 2009:
Financials
Title: STATE OF IOWA VS HANSON, GREG SCOTT
Case: 06571 AGCR015216 (LINN)
Citation Number:
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 9200.00 850.00 8350.00
FINE 500.00 500.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 150.00 150.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 0.00 0.00 0.00
$9850.00 $1500.00 $8350.00
Yes, Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson still owes over
$8000.00 related to his convictions for BEATING his ex-wife.
krp
"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:4b1f07f2$0$31286$607e...@cv.net...
>>> MY PREDICTION: Maureen would say or suggest it was a "FAKE."
>>>
>>> MOE> The jpeg you sent me of his " honorable discharge" certificate was
>>> MOE> interesting.
>>>
>>> MOE> One that he used a camera to make the image, not scan it. And did
>>> it
>>> MOE> slightly off, angle-wise. Wonder why he simply didn't scan it. It
>>> MOE> would have been easier.
>>>
>>> MOE> The font used for his name and date are also curious.
>>>
>>> ON CUE - Maureen suggests it *IS* a fake! Golly - I must be "Carnack
>>> the magnificent."
>>
>> MOE> I said it was curious, not that it was a fake.
>>
>> Oh SURE you endorse it as REAL, don't ya, Moe. All those comments were
>> PRAISE, weren't they?
>
> In the YEARS you've been posting on asCPS, ken pangborn, I've yet to see a
> single client of yours post their thanks for how you helped them prevail
> against CPS or any person or in ANY court of law.
Could that be because you have turned ASCPS into your own personal
wasteland, Danny? They say it in other places (other than Usenet) like in
Falseacc and in other family rights discussion groups. Places that won't let
YOU in! Golly, I wonder WHY????
krp
> > MY PREDICTION: Maureen would say or suggest it was a "FAKE."
>
> > MOE> The jpeg you sent me of his " honorable discharge" certificate was
> > MOE> interesting.
>
> > MOE> One that he used a camera to make the image, not scan it. And did
> > it
> > MOE> slightly off, angle-wise. Wonder why he simply didn't scan it. It
> > MOE> would have been easier.
>
> > MOE> The font used for his name and date are also curious.
>
> > ON CUE - Maureen suggests it *IS* a fake! Golly - I must be "Carnack
> > the magnificent."
>
> MOE> I said it was curious, not that it was a fake.
>
> Oh SURE you endorse it as REAL, don't ya, Moe. All those comments were
> PRAISE, weren't they?
MOE> It LOOKS legit, BUT it is a photo not a scan. And it may be a copy
MOE> you made of the original, I dunno.
Maureen, SCANS are usually done into IMAGE files or text files. Image =
JPEG.
MOE> What I DO know is that " honorable discharge" could mean anything
MOE> from serving actually with honor to serving without getting your ass
MOE> in court martial type trouble.
There you go again, the "BRAT" who thinks that daddy having serves makes
THEM an expert on the military. Thanks to the PEANUT FARMER from Georgia,
military discharges were changed dramatically. But before Jimmy Carter an
Honorable Discharge actually MEANT "HONORABLE" service. The other end of the
spectrum was the "DISHONORABLE DISCHARGE." That meaning you were a BAD boy
or girl. Then the "BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE" sort of like George Carlin. But
right above that was the "GENERAL" discharge. That's for those whose
service was more or less honorable but managed just not to be court
martialed. Article 15 cases. So back in those days "HONORABLE" actually
MEANT "HONORABLE."
You are sort of right on one thing. That certificate IS a duplicate. My
original (along with almost all documentation of my life to that time) was
destroyed by my first wife in one of her drunken rages. That one actually
said, "HONORABLE DISCHARGE (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS") Yes Maureen they
USED to specify the nature of your service. The only things better are
various awards granted and commendations. I had some of those as well. Oh,
and Maureen, ONE of them was signed by General Callish. It seems that Mather
AFB being in California would get tapped from time to time to send guys to
help fight forest fires. I did 3 of them in my years at Mather. In one my
group was trapped on a mountain surrounded by approaching fire. I'll spare
the details - but I got a commendation signed from my squadron to group to
the base commander with endorsements all the way up. And then to the AF
Chief of Staff. General Bomb them into the stone age) himself. I am willing
to be that you'll claim PROOF it never happened. The people had to be
airlifted off the mountain. The helicopter took 2 or 3 at a time. I was the
LAST one taken off. Which had something to do with the awards that followed.
Dan Sullivan
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4b1f07f2$0$31286$607e...@cv.net...
>
>>>> MY PREDICTION: Maureen would say or suggest it was a "FAKE."
>>>>
>>>> MOE> The jpeg you sent me of his " honorable discharge" certificate was
>>>> MOE> interesting.
>>>>
>>>> MOE> One that he used a camera to make the image, not scan it. And did
>>>> it
>>>> MOE> slightly off, angle-wise. Wonder why he simply didn't scan it. It
>>>> MOE> would have been easier.
>>>>
>>>> MOE> The font used for his name and date are also curious.
>>>>
>>>> ON CUE - Maureen suggests it *IS* a fake! Golly - I must be "Carnack
>>>> the magnificent."
>>>
>>> MOE> I said it was curious, not that it was a fake.
>>>
>>> Oh SURE you endorse it as REAL, don't ya, Moe. All those comments
>>> were PRAISE, weren't they?
>>
>> In the YEARS you've been posting on asCPS, ken pangborn, I've yet to see
>> a single client of yours post their thanks for how you helped them
>> prevail against CPS or any person or in ANY court of law.
>
> Could that be because you have turned ASCPS into your own personal
> wasteland, Danny?
Are you claiming I can prevent people from posting here or can edit what
people say?
Dan Sullivan
"krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
news:4b1f719b$0$4892$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4b1f07f2$0$31286$607e...@cv.net...
>>>> MY PREDICTION: Maureen would say or suggest it was a "FAKE."
>>>> MOE> The jpeg you sent me of his " honorable discharge" certificate was
>>>> MOE> interesting.
>>>> MOE> One that he used a camera to make the image, not scan it. And did
>>>> it
>>>> MOE> slightly off, angle-wise. Wonder why he simply didn't scan it. It
>>>> MOE> would have been easier.
>>>> MOE> The font used for his name and date are also curious.
>>>> ON CUE - Maureen suggests it *IS* a fake! Golly - I must be "Carnack
>>>> the magnificent."
>>> MOE> I said it was curious, not that it was a fake.
>>> Oh SURE you endorse it as REAL, don't ya, Moe. All those comments
>>> were PRAISE, weren't they?
>> In the YEARS you've been posting on asCPS, ken pangborn, I've yet to see
>> a single client of yours post their thanks for how you helped them
>> prevail against CPS or any person or in ANY court of law.
> Could that be because you have turned ASCPS into your own personal
> wasteland, Danny?
Are you claiming I can prevent people from posting here or can edit
what
people say?
krp
>> Could that be because you have turned ASCPS into your own personal
>> wasteland, Danny?
> Are you claiming I can prevent people from posting here or can edit what
> people say?
No you fukkkkking RETARD. I am STATING that you prevent people from
posting here by your BOMBAST and using the newsgroup as your personal THRONE
ROOM! People don't miss how you ATTACK anyone that doesn't genuflect at your
feet and kiss your ring. You don't edit what they say you just discourage
open discussions where folks can DISAGREE with the GREAT GOD SULLIVAN. You
RUN ASCPS as your own personal empire. Has it escaped your attention, BOZO,
that "discussion" in this newsgroup STOPPED even before I showed up here?
Unless you call the SHIT that you, Kane, and Ron were doing to people a
"discussion" where you ganged up on them. Like LK and MANY others. You're a
PUNK, Sullivan. I have asked you to name something in your life a POSITIVE
ACCOMPLISHMENT - - and your ONLY answer was attacking Greg and I. That is
your ONLY CLAIM for going on for near 62 YEARS of your miserable life. That
is the BEST and ONLY justification you can give for living, Sullivan. THAT'S
IT!
Dan Sullivan
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4b1fb0a3$0$22512$607e...@cv.net...
>
>>> Could that be because you have turned ASCPS into your own personal
>>> wasteland, Danny?
>
>> Are you claiming I can prevent people from posting here or can edit what
>> people say?
>
>
> No you fukkkkking RETARD. I am STATING that you prevent people from
> posting here
No, I don't prevent people from posting on asCPS.
> by your BOMBAST and using the newsgroup as your personal THRONE ROOM!
> People don't miss how you ATTACK anyone that doesn't genuflect at your
> feet and kiss your ring. You don't edit what they say you just discourage
> open discussions where folks can DISAGREE with the GREAT GOD SULLIVAN.
Convicted abusers of mentally challenged women and who are listed on their
states chid abuse registry, like grag hanson?
Frauds, third rate hacks and liars like you, pangborn?
The proof that what you're claiming is a lie is the fact that I haven't
stopped either you or grag from posting, and it's you and grag that have
turned asCPS into a wasteland.
> You RUN ASCPS as your own personal empire. Has it escaped your attention,
> BOZO, that "discussion" in this newsgroup STOPPED even before I showed up
> here?
Yes, grag was trying to flush asCPS down the toilet long before you got
here.
And he brought you into asCPS as the ultimate clown.
Of course grag doesn't care that you called him a schmuck and a schlub, he's
had YOU doing HIS bidding since he got you here!!!
LOL!!!
Greegor
DJS3 > ken pangborn, I've yet to see a single client
DJS3 > of yours post their thanks for how you helped
DJS3 > them prevail against CPS or any person or
DJS3 > in ANY court of law.
G > Moe says Ken is begging for praise
G > Dan says no past customers ever posted praise
G >
G > How many praises for ANYBODY do you
G > see in usenet, Dan, and how many of those
G > are the principal themself using a sock or a shill?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/cb725736421ae1ec
DJS3 > Surely you recall Jennifer Buckley,
DJS3 > Chuck Kimmel, etc, etc... posting
DJS3 > their appreciation.
Exactly, Dan, YOUR SOCKS and SHILLS!
You think because you present shills
and sycophants, that Ken should?
krp
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d4ed0aec-68f9-4aba...@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
I am supped to believe in the TOOTH FAIRY as well. Jimmy Kimmel's
brother would ONLY come to Dan Sullivan to REPRESENT HIM in his legal case
with CPS. YEAH RIGHT, I believe that, and I also believe OJ Simpson was
innocent. I am looking to invest in a bridge in Brooklyn too!
Dan Sullivan
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:d4ed0aec-68f9-4aba...@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
YOU exchanged hundreds of messages with Jennifer and Chuck, grag.
krp
>
> "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:4b1fc679$0$4969$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>
>> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>> news:4b1fb0a3$0$22512$607e...@cv.net...
>>
>>>> Could that be because you have turned ASCPS into your own personal
>>>> wasteland, Danny?
>>
>>> Are you claiming I can prevent people from posting here or can edit what
>>> people say?
>>
>>
>> No you fukkkkking RETARD. I am STATING that you prevent people from
>> posting here
> No, I don't prevent people from posting on asCPS.
Sure you DO, you abusive prick!!! Who the hell wqants to join in knowing
that YOU, the emperor of the universe will jump down their throat IF they
DARE disagree with the GREAT OZ (Sullivan).
>> by your BOMBAST and using the newsgroup as your personal THRONE ROOM!
>> People don't miss how you ATTACK anyone that doesn't genuflect at your
>> feet and kiss your ring. You don't edit what they say you just
>> discourage open discussions where folks can DISAGREE with the GREAT GOD
>> SULLIVAN.
> Convicted abusers of mentally challenged women and who are listed on their
> states chid abuse registry, like grag hanson?
> Frauds, third rate hacks and liars like you, pangborn?
Youhave your own special status as JUDGE and Jury, Sullivan and you
SCARE OFF people who had wanted to enter discussions here. You gave the
place a reputation by how you jump people, and, asshole, you were doing it
to people LONG before my first post in ASCPS. You're a bully wannabe.
> The proof that what you're claiming is a lie is the fact that I haven't
> stopped either you or grag from posting, and it's you and grag that have
> turned asCPS into a wasteland.
No - you found two people willing to stand up to you. It dives you BAT
SHIT because you used to RULE the newsgroup and only people wiling to kiss
your ass and genuflect could safely post. You ATTACKED anyone who NDARE
disagree with you, like Mike, LK and MANY MANY MANY others you drove off
because they just didn't want to put up with YOUR SHIT!
>> You RUN ASCPS as your own personal empire. Has it escaped your
>> attention, BOZO, that "discussion" in this newsgroup STOPPED even before
>> I showed up here?
> Yes, grag was trying to flush asCPS down the toilet long before you got
> here.
> And he brought you into asCPS as the ultimate clown.
No JERKOFF - YOU dragged me into ASCPS with your BULLSHIT bad legal
advice to people.
> Of course grag doesn't care that you called him a schmuck and a schlub,
> he's had YOU doing HIS bidding since he got you here!!!
Make up your mind, am I doing GREG'S bidding or is he doing mine, eh
psycho? Pick a lane. Greg isn't a terribly complicated guy. He's very
straightforward and not a devious ASSHOLE like YOU. He's Joe sixpack. Not
somebody trying to fool the world that he is an intellectual giant like you.
Dan Sullivan
>
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:4b1fce30$0$22522$607e...@cv.net...
>>
>> "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:4b1fc679$0$4969$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>
>>> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>>> news:4b1fb0a3$0$22512$607e...@cv.net...
>>>
>>>>> Could that be because you have turned ASCPS into your own personal
>>>>> wasteland, Danny?
>>>
>>>> Are you claiming I can prevent people from posting here or can edit
>>>> what people say?
>>>
>>>
>>> No you fukkkkking RETARD. I am STATING that you prevent people from
>>> posting here
>
>> No, I don't prevent people from posting on asCPS.
>
> Sure you DO, you abusive prick!!!
And I'm supposedly allowing you and grag to continue to post?
Why would I do that?
>>> by your BOMBAST and using the newsgroup as your personal THRONE ROOM!
>>> People don't miss how you ATTACK anyone that doesn't genuflect at your
>>> feet and kiss your ring. You don't edit what they say you just
>>> discourage open discussions where folks can DISAGREE with the GREAT GOD
>>> SULLIVAN.
>
>> Convicted abusers of mentally challenged women and who are listed on
>> their states chid abuse registry, like grag hanson?
>> Frauds, third rate hacks and liars like you, pangborn?
>
> Youhave your own special status as JUDGE and Jury, Sullivan and you
> SCARE OFF people who had wanted to enter discussions here. You gave the
> place a reputation by how you jump people, and, asshole, you were doing it
> to people LONG before my first post in ASCPS. You're a bully wannabe.
There were people here before you came (such as grag) that wanted people to
stay in trouble with CPS.
Those people heard what I had to say, much like yourself, pangborn.
>> The proof that what you're claiming is a lie is the fact that I haven't
>> stopped either you or grag from posting, and it's you and grag that have
>> turned asCPS into a wasteland.
>
> No - you found two people willing to stand up to you.
A twice convicted abuser of a mentally challenged woman, who's also listed
on his state's child abuse registry... and you, pangborn, a third rate hack,
fraud and liar.
Greegor
KRP > your personal THRONE ROOM!
KRP > People don't miss how you ATTACK
KRP > anyone that doesn't genuflect at your
KRP > feet and kiss your ring. You don't edit
KRP > what they say you just discourage
KRP > open discussions where folks can
KRP > DISAGREE with the GREAT GOD SULLIVAN.
DJS3 > Convicted abusers of mentally challenged
DJS3 > women
Where did you meet your bipolar ex-wife, Dan?
Were you both patients in the same psych ward?
Did you take advantage of her when you made
several BABIES with a freakin mental case?
DJS3 > and who are listed on their states
DJS3 > chid abuse registry, like grag hanson?
You were listed as FOUNDED on FIVE
of your 20+ Child Protection investigations.
DJS3 > Frauds, third rate hacks and liars like you, pangborn?
Post your credentials, DJ!
DJS3 > The proof that what you're claiming is a lie
DJS3 > is the fact that I haven't stopped either you
DJS3 > or grag from posting, and it's you and grag
DJS3 > that have turned asCPS into a wasteland.
Kane posted gratuitous profanity for over a year
and bragged about it afterwards.
He used the C word on a woman and other
hard core profanity profusely.
The intent was scorched earth policy.
Kane and you were VERY close and posted
testimonials for each other like you were
simultaneously fellating each other 69 style.
The circular testimonials were one of your
funniest attempts at a con job.
Kane turned out to be a retired Oregon
caseworker who lives in Carson, Wa.
Donald Lewis Fisher's own very OLD posts
were the final and most definitive proof,
so you and your cult went into overdrive
trying to deny it.
KRP > You RUN ASCPS as your own personal
KRP > empire. Has it escaped your attention,
KRP > BOZO, that "discussion" in this newsgroup
KRP > STOPPED even before I showed up here?
DJS3 > Yes, grag was trying to flush asCPS
DJS3 > down the toilet long before you got here.
Dan you incited your buddy Dave to
actually "flush" (your word) the group
both flooding it and rogue cancelling
stuff you didn't like.
Funny then you would accuse me of
doing what you actually did.
DJS3 > And he brought you into asCPS
DJS3 > as the ultimate clown.
DJS3 >
DJS3 > Of course grag doesn't care that you
DJS3 > called him a schmuck and a schlub,
Just because YOUR ego could not stand
it you think MY ego can't stand it?
Your egotism is monumental, Dan!
DJS3 > he's had YOU doing HIS bidding since
DJS3 > he got you here!!!
DJS3 >
DJS3 > LOL!!!
Damn, I'm GOOD! LOL
So, Dan, since you used socks, shills and
a retired CASEWORKER to post bogus
testimonials to inflate your bogus EGO,
is that why you think Ken should get
genuine satisfied customers and attorneys
to post testimonials on usenet?
So Dave and your other stooges can prank them?
Riiight...
Dan Sullivan
> KRP > by your BOMBAST and using the newsgroup as
> KRP > your personal THRONE ROOM!
> KRP > People don't miss how you ATTACK
> KRP > anyone that doesn't genuflect at your
> KRP > feet and kiss your ring. You don't edit
> KRP > what they say you just discourage
> KRP > open discussions where folks can
> KRP > DISAGREE with the GREAT GOD SULLIVAN.
>
> DJS3 > Convicted abusers of mentally challenged
> DJS3 > women
>
> Where did you meet your bipolar ex-wife, Dan?
> Were you both patients in the same psych ward?
>
> Did you take advantage of her when you made
> several BABIES with a freakin mental case?
>
> DJS3 > and who are listed on their states
> DJS3 > chid abuse registry, like grag hanson?
>
> You were listed as FOUNDED on FIVE
> of your 20+ Child Protection investigations.
I have no "founded" CPS reports against me, grag, nor any convictions.
> DJS3 > Frauds, third rate hacks and liars like you, pangborn?
>
> Post your credentials, DJ!
>
> DJS3 > The proof that what you're claiming is a lie
> DJS3 > is the fact that I haven't stopped either you
> DJS3 > or grag from posting, and it's you and grag
> DJS3 > that have turned asCPS into a wasteland.
>
> Kane posted gratuitous profanity for over a year
> and bragged about it afterwards.
So what?
And I did voice my disapproval.
> He used the C word on a woman and other
> hard core profanity profusely.
BFD.
> The intent was scorched earth policy.
> Kane and you were VERY close and posted
> testimonials for each other like you were
> simultaneously fellating each other 69 style.
Kane helped and continues to help in every case I work on.
Three at the moment, one criminal.
> The circular testimonials were one of your
> funniest attempts at a con job.
>
> Kane turned out to be a retired Oregon
> caseworker who lives in Carson, Wa.
Foster care trainer.
> Donald Lewis Fisher's own very OLD posts
> were the final and most definitive proof,
> so you and your cult went into overdrive
> trying to deny it.
Proof of what?
> KRP > You RUN ASCPS as your own personal
> KRP > empire. Has it escaped your attention,
> KRP > BOZO, that "discussion" in this newsgroup
> KRP > STOPPED even before I showed up here?
>
> DJS3 > Yes, grag was trying to flush asCPS
> DJS3 > down the toilet long before you got here.
>
> Dan you incited your buddy Dave to
> actually "flush" (your word) the group
> both flooding it and rogue cancelling
> stuff you didn't like.
Who did I ask to flush asCPS?
> Funny then you would accuse me of
> doing what you actually did.
When the shit gets flushed, grag, you and pangborn can hold hands as
you swirl down the bowl.
Greegor
Dan Sullivan
>
> Dan's bitchy that he can't RUN the newsgroups.
I just want to keep you and pangborn looking like the total fools you are,
grag.
Kent Wills
Pangborn does believe that David Moore can and does edit the
posts archived on Google. See sig for the verbatim quote with MID,
should you wish to verify the accuracy and context.
You don't have to take my word for it. Use the MID in the sig to
find and verify the accuracy and context of the quote.
Whereas he firmly believes that, he may well believe that you can
prevent people from posting to any newsgroup you wish.
Of course, Google shows that Greg was exposing his extremely
pro-CPS possition long before you started exposing him doesn't matter
to Pangborn.
Kent Wills
wrote:
Where does anyone claim Dan has turned ASCPS into a wasteland?
Maybe you've confused Dan and Greg?
"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, LYING
and claiming David Moore is his gay lover. Message-ID:
<_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06>
Kent Wills
wrote:
>DJS3 > In the YEARS you've been posting on asCPS,
You have admitted, by YOUR standards, that you were lying about
them being anything other than real people.
>
>You think because you present shills
>and sycophants, that Ken should?
Ken has done so in the past (judgedredd is but one example). Why
do you propose he's unable/unwilling to do so now?
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:d4ed0aec-68f9-4aba...@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
>> DJS3 > In the YEARS you've been posting on asCPS,
>> DJS3 > ken pangborn, I've yet to see a single client
>> DJS3 > of yours post their thanks for how you helped
>> DJS3 > them prevail against CPS or any person or
>> DJS3 > in ANY court of law.
>>
>> G > Moe says Ken is begging for praise
>> G > Dan says no past customers ever posted praise
>> G >
>> G > How many praises for ANYBODY do you
>> G > see in usenet, Dan, and how many of those
>> G > are the principal themself using a sock or a shill?
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/cb725736421ae1ec
>>
>> DJS3 > Surely you recall Jennifer Buckley,
>> DJS3 > Chuck Kimmel, etc, etc... posting
>> DJS3 > their appreciation.
>>
>> Exactly, Dan, YOUR SOCKS and SHILLS!
>
>
> I am supped to believe in the TOOTH FAIRY as well. Jimmy Kimmel's
>brother would ONLY come to Dan Sullivan to REPRESENT HIM in his legal case
>with CPS.
When, outside of your drunken delusions, has Chuck claimed to be
a lawyer? When has anyone, other than you, claimed Chuck Kimmel is a
lawyer?
Be specific, unless you'd rather admit I've exposed yet another
of your MANY drunken pathological lies.
>YEAH RIGHT, I believe that, and I also believe OJ Simpson was
>innocent.
He was found guilty on October 3, 2008. You may believe he was
and is innocent of all charges, but he was proved guilty beyond a
reasonable doubt. Much as Greg was found guilty beyond a reasonable
doubt for BEATING his mentally ill ex-wife.
Greg was and is so guilty of the offence, the Iowa Supreme Court
refused to even listen to any arguments from the appeal his lawyer
filed. That's some SERIOUS guilt!
I don't know if OJ's lawyers have filed an appeal.
> I am looking to invest in a bridge in Brooklyn too!
>
Given you're so bad at managing your finances you had to declare
bankruptcy, it's not too hard to accept that you would wish to invest
in such a thing.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:4b1fce30$0$22522$607e...@cv.net...
>>
>> "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:4b1fc679$0$4969$9a6e...@unlimited.newshosting.com...
>>>
>>> "Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>>> news:4b1fb0a3$0$22512$607e...@cv.net...
>>>
>>>>> Could that be because you have turned ASCPS into your own personal
>>>>> wasteland, Danny?
>>>
>>>> Are you claiming I can prevent people from posting here or can edit what
>>>> people say?
>>>
>>>
>>> No you fukkkkking RETARD. I am STATING that you prevent people from
>>> posting here
>
>> No, I don't prevent people from posting on asCPS.
>
> Sure you DO, you abusive prick!!!
I expect if he had the power your alcohol induced mental illness
(unless you lied about both) demands, he would have prevented you and
Greg from posting your disruptive troll rants.
>Who the hell wqants to join in knowing
>that YOU, the emperor of the universe will jump down their throat IF they
>DARE disagree with the GREAT OZ (Sullivan).
When, outside of your latest proof you only post when drunk, has
Dan done such a thing?
Be specific, including MIDs and/or Google links (a win for you),
unless I've just exposed ANOTHER of your MANY drunken pathological
lies (another in the LONG list of Kenneth Robert Pangborn losses).
>
>>> by your BOMBAST and using the newsgroup as your personal THRONE ROOM!
>>> People don't miss how you ATTACK anyone that doesn't genuflect at your
>>> feet and kiss your ring. You don't edit what they say you just
>>> discourage open discussions where folks can DISAGREE with the GREAT GOD
>>> SULLIVAN.
>
>> Convicted abusers of mentally challenged women and who are listed on their
>> states chid abuse registry, like grag hanson?
>> Frauds, third rate hacks and liars like you, pangborn?
>
> Youhave your own special status as JUDGE and Jury, Sullivan and you
>SCARE OFF people who had wanted to enter discussions here.
So long as you and Greg are busy keeping people from discussing
that for which the groups were made, it's not too likely on-topic
discussion will occur.
>You gave the
>place a reputation by how you jump people, and, asshole, you were doing it
>to people LONG before my first post in ASCPS. You're a bully wannabe.
>
If your claim is true, prove it. That will be a win for you.
If you are lying, you'll never be able to prove it. That will be
ANOTHER in a LONG list of losses for you.
>> The proof that what you're claiming is a lie is the fact that I haven't
>> stopped either you or grag from posting, and it's you and grag that have
>> turned asCPS into a wasteland.
>
> No - you found two people willing to stand up to you. It dives you BAT
>SHIT because you used to RULE the newsgroup and only people wiling to kiss
>your ass and genuflect could safely post. You ATTACKED anyone who NDARE
>disagree with you, like Mike, LK and MANY MANY MANY others you drove off
>because they just didn't want to put up with YOUR SHIT!
Mike was and is nothing more than a troll. He was fun, but he was
still a troll.
Patrick (aka LK) was, and probably is, very pro-CPS. His
attacking those who dared to win against CPS stands as reason to
believe he's all about CPS winning. Much like your buddy Greg, only
without all the criminal and civil cases having been lost.
>
>>> You RUN ASCPS as your own personal empire. Has it escaped your
>>> attention, BOZO, that "discussion" in this newsgroup STOPPED even before
>>> I showed up here?
>
>> Yes, grag was trying to flush asCPS down the toilet long before you got
>> here.
>
>> And he brought you into asCPS as the ultimate clown.
>
> No JERKOFF - YOU dragged me into ASCPS with your BULLSHIT bad legal
>advice to people.
Dan's not given legal advice.
You used to claim it was David Moore who brought you to ASCPS.
Where you lying then, or are you lying now? There's no way both
claims can be true. Both *can* be lies. One must be a lie.
>
>> Of course grag doesn't care that you called him a schmuck and a schlub,
>> he's had YOU doing HIS bidding since he got you here!!!
>
> Make up your mind, am I doing GREG'S bidding or is he doing mine, eh
>psycho?
Everyone is aware that Greg is so weak willed he does whatever
you tell him to do. This has been proved multiple times.
I've not seen anyone claim you do his bidding.
10 out of 10 for the attempt to distract from the truth. Negative
several million for using such an OBVIOUS lie.
>Pick a lane. Greg isn't a terribly complicated guy. He's very
>straightforward and not a devious ASSHOLE like YOU. He's Joe sixpack.
No, he's Greg the Wife BEATER and child abuser (unless he's lied
about abusing Lisa's daughter).
>Not
>somebody trying to fool the world that he is an intellectual giant like you.
>
Greg used to claim he is erudite. He's ceased doing so since I
consistently PROVED he is the polar opposite.
"CPS cases are legal matters. Offering advice IS practicing law
without a license."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he practices law without a
license in misc.legal
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Kane posted gratuitous profanity for over a year
The man hasn't posted in YEARS, and you're still OBSESSED with
him.
How badly did he prove you to be the worthless, pro-CPS scum you
are that after so long you still think about him?
>and bragged about it afterwards.
>He used the C word on a woman and other
>hard core profanity profusely.
Are you saying he adopted Pangborn's posting style?
I bet Ken's proud that someone used his posting style.
>The intent was scorched earth policy.
>Kane and you were VERY close and posted
>testimonials for each other like you were
>simultaneously fellating each other 69 style.
Do you often think of homosexual acts, Greg?
>The circular testimonials were one of your
>funniest attempts at a con job.
>
>Kane turned out to be a retired Oregon
>caseworker who lives in Carson, Wa.
Kane was PROVED to have lived in Kansas.
Care to try a different lie?
>Donald Lewis Fisher's own very OLD posts
I fail to see what one person has to do with the other.
>were the final and most definitive proof,
>so you and your cult went into overdrive
>trying to deny it.
If the claim you present were true, no denial could be offered
without being exposed. I've seen nothing to even suggest you exposed
any deception.
The reason is, of course, that you and your daisy chain of pro-CPS
shills never proved any deception in the denials.
krp
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fgg1i5lffjtr209qg...@4ax.com...
!
>>
>>
>> I am supped to believe in the TOOTH FAIRY as well. Jimmy Kimmel's
>>brother would ONLY come to Dan Sullivan to REPRESENT HIM in his legal case
>>with CPS.
>
> When, outside of your drunken delusions, has Chuck claimed to be
> a lawyer? When has anyone, other than you, claimed Chuck Kimmel is a
> lawyer?
Kunt your old "English as a 9th Language" reading problem again?
Greegor
KRP > ASCPS into your own personal wasteland,
KRP > Danny? They say it in other places
KRP > (other than Usenet) like in Falseacc and
KRP > in other family rights discussion groups.
KRP > Places that won't let YOU in!
KRP > Golly, I wonder WHY????
Dan is used to being rejected by Family Rights groups.
After he got kicked out of FightCPS he lied
about it in ascps until two moderators showed
up in ascps and refuted his deception.
Dan of course got quite pissy at them.
He started arguing about the MEANING of
an e-mail notice that he was ejected.
The funny part was that Dan had previously
claimed that he had not received any such notice!
Kent Wills
wrote:
I read what you wrote. If you were too drunk to post what you
intended, that's your issue to address.
> They don't use metaphors in Poland.
< That explains a lot.
I don't think they use toilets either.
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, insane drunken (by his own claims)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team expressing his
bigotry. In this instance it's against the people in Poland.
Message-ID: <M6Krj.1145$r03.503@trnddc08>
krp
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am supped to believe in the TOOTH FAIRY as well. Jimmy Kimmel's
>>>>brother would ONLY come to Dan Sullivan to REPRESENT HIM in his legal
>>>>case
>>>>with CPS.
>>>
>>> When, outside of your drunken delusions, has Chuck claimed to be
>>> a lawyer? When has anyone, other than you, claimed Chuck Kimmel is a
>>> lawyer?
>>
>> Kunt your old "English as a 9th Language" reading problem again?
>
> I read what you wrote. If you were too drunk to post what you
> intended, that's your issue to address.
Kunt - the amusement value of your posts is in rapid decline again. You
are endlessly repeating yourself with your IDIOTIC bullshit. I am now only
selectively responding to you and that is on the decline side of the bell
curve. You are speeding to the bit bin, Wills. Don't think you have won
because I IGNORE most of your messages.
womanGoddess
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:4baa2ddc-7af0-45b4...@m7g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > > MY PREDICTION: Maureen would say or suggest it was a "FAKE."
>
> > > MOE> The jpeg you sent me of his " honorable discharge" certificate was
> > > MOE> interesting.
>
> > > MOE> One that he used a camera to make the image, not scan it. And did
> > > it
> > > MOE> slightly off, angle-wise. Wonder why he simply didn't scan it. It
> > > MOE> would have been easier.
>
> > > MOE> The font used for his name and date are also curious.
>
> > > ON CUE - Maureen suggests it *IS* a fake! Golly - I must be "Carnack
> > > the magnificent."
>
> > MOE> I said it was curious, not that it was a fake.
>
> > Oh SURE you endorse it as REAL, don't ya, Moe. All those comments were
> > PRAISE, weren't they?
>
> MOE> It LOOKS legit, BUT it is a photo not a scan. And it may be a copy
> MOE> you made of the original, I dunno.
>
> Maureen, SCANS are usually done into IMAGE files or text files. Image =
> JPEG.
Flatbed scanner Kennie. You put the document on the glass of the
flatbed scanner and it scans the physical document into a computer
file.
You used a camera yo make your image, not did the direct image making
of a document most people do nowadays.
>
> MOE> What I DO know is that " honorable discharge" could mean anything
> MOE> from serving actually with honor to serving without getting your ass
> MOE> in court martial type trouble.
>
> There you go again, the "BRAT" who thinks that daddy having serves makes
> THEM an expert on the military. Thanks to the PEANUT FARMER from Georgia,
> military discharges were changed dramatically. But before Jimmy Carter an
> Honorable Discharge actually MEANT "HONORABLE" service. The other end of the
> spectrum was the "DISHONORABLE DISCHARGE." That meaning you were a BAD boy
> or girl. Then the "BAD CONDUCT DISCHARGE" sort of like George Carlin. But
> right above that was the "GENERAL" discharge. That's for those whose
> service was more or less honorable but managed just not to be court
> martialed. Article 15 cases. So back in those days "HONORABLE" actually
> MEANT "HONORABLE."
So you claim. Your word means nothing to me.
>
> You are sort of right on one thing. That certificate IS a duplicate. My
> original (along with almost all documentation of my life to that time) was
> destroyed by my first wife in one of her drunken rages. That one actually
> said, "HONORABLE DISCHARGE (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS") Yes Maureen they
> USED to specify the nature of your service.
AMAZING!! You actually admitted I was RIGHT!!!
Yes I did think it might have been a replacement document done later
on from your original discharge. Certain specifics about it were odd.
>The only things better are
> various awards granted and commendations. I had some of those as well. Oh,
> and Maureen, ONE of them was signed by General Callish.
Your claims, as usual, No proof, OC. And since you change your PB
page to private, well you might as well claim you got the Nobel Peace
prize.
Your word has no value with me Kennie. I've seen you lie to much.
> It seems that Mather
> AFB being in California would get tapped from time to time to send guys to
> help fight forest fires. I did 3 of them in my years at Mather. In one my
> group was trapped on a mountain surrounded by approaching fire. I'll spare
> the details - but I got a commendation signed from my squadron to group to
> the base commander with endorsements all the way up. And then to the AF
> Chief of Staff. General Bomb them into the stone age) himself. I am willing
> to be that you'll claim PROOF it never happened. The people had to be
> airlifted off the mountain. The helicopter took 2 or 3 at a time. I was the
> LAST one taken off. Which had something to do with the awards that followed.
Again your claim. Your word has no value with me since I've seen you
lie so much.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
Greegor
krp
"womanGoddess" <fvr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:efda8134-1f3b-4772...@m26g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > MY PREDICTION: Maureen would say or suggest it was a "FAKE."
>
> > > MOE> The jpeg you sent me of his " honorable discharge" certificate
> > > was
> > > MOE> interesting.
>
> > > MOE> One that he used a camera to make the image, not scan it. And did
> > > it
> > > MOE> slightly off, angle-wise. Wonder why he simply didn't scan it. It
> > > MOE> would have been easier.
>
> > > MOE> The font used for his name and date are also curious.
>
> > > ON CUE - Maureen suggests it *IS* a fake! Golly - I must be "Carnack
> > > the magnificent."
>
> > MOE> I said it was curious, not that it was a fake.
>
> > Oh SURE you endorse it as REAL, don't ya, Moe. All those comments were
> > PRAISE, weren't they?
>
> MOE> It LOOKS legit, BUT it is a photo not a scan. And it may be a copy
> MOE> you made of the original, I dunno.
>
> Maureen, SCANS are usually done into IMAGE files or text files. Image =
> JPEG.
MOE> Flatbed scanner Kennie. You put the document on the glass of the
MOE> flatbed scanner and it scans the physical document into a computer
file.
Really, Maureen? A "computer file?" And what pray tell would a "COMPUTER
FILE" look like if not a jpeg, text, or document file? Jones.computer? Not
Jones.jpg? There you go AGAIN brainiac
womanGoddess
> "womanGoddess" <fvrn...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Kennie, why didn't you make a flatbed scan of it in the first place?
Your noise otherwise is just smoke out of your arse as a distraction.
Greegor
Moe > And it may be a copy you made of the original, I dunno.
KRP > Maureen, SCANS are usually done into IMAGE
KRP > files or text files. Image = JPEG.
Moe > Flatbed scanner Kennie. You put the document
Moe > on the glass of the flatbed scanner and it scans
Moe > the physical document into a computer file.
KRP > Really, Maureen? A "computer file?" And what pray
KRP > tell would a "COMPUTER FILE" look like if not
KRP > a jpeg, text, or document file? Jones.computer?
KRP > Not Jones.jpg? There you go AGAIN brainiac
Moe > Kennie, why didn't you make a
Moe > flatbed scan of it in the first place?
Moe >
Moe > Your noise otherwise is just smoke
Moe > out of your arse as a distraction.
Moe wants a SCAN and she wants it NOW! LOL
Send it to her in TEXT format!
LOL
You know, Ken, somebody once sent Dan
pictures from his colonoscopy!
I bet you are developing an appreciation of why!
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:fn34i5dk5ajtfalju...@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am supped to believe in the TOOTH FAIRY as well. Jimmy Kimmel's
>>>>>brother would ONLY come to Dan Sullivan to REPRESENT HIM in his legal
>>>>>case
>>>>>with CPS.
>>>>
>>>> When, outside of your drunken delusions, has Chuck claimed to be
>>>> a lawyer? When has anyone, other than you, claimed Chuck Kimmel is a
>>>> lawyer?
>>>
>>> Kunt your old "English as a 9th Language" reading problem again?
>>
>> I read what you wrote. If you were too drunk to post what you
>> intended, that's your issue to address.
>
>
> Kunt - the amusement value of your posts is in rapid decline again.
Are you again going to LIE and claim to kill file me, only to
reply to some of my posts directly? You've done so before.
>You
>are endlessly repeating yourself with your IDIOTIC bullshit.
Outside of your drunken stupors, the truth isn't idiotic
bullshit.
>I am now only
>selectively responding to you and that is on the decline side of the bell
>curve. You are speeding to the bit bin, Wills. Don't think you have won
>because I IGNORE most of your messages.
>
Why do you lie? The truth is I am able to expose most, if not
all, of your lies. In the desperate hope that the TRUTH will go away,
you RUN.
Sort of like the TRUTH that you flat out LIED about David being
adopted (as PROVED by your cowardly RUNNING from honoring your word
that you would post the proof you claim exists).
You are a coward, and there's no escaping that.
"Maybe he's like me to attach some kiddie porn to aid his fantasies"
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn, alcoholic (according to him)
owner/operator of KRP CONsulting and The A-Team, expressing his
fondness for child porn in
Message-ID:
<RECUi.494$Q%3.238@trnddc04>
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>KRP > Really, Maureen? A "computer file?" And what pray
>KRP > tell would a "COMPUTER FILE" look like if not
>KRP > a jpeg, text, or document file? Jones.computer?
>KRP > Not Jones.jpg? =A0There you go AGAIN brainiac
>
>Moe >=A0Kennie, why didn't you make a
>Moe > flatbed scan of =A0it in the first place?
>Moe >
>Moe > Your noise otherwise is just smoke
>Moe > out of your arse as a distraction.
Can anyone reading explain why when Greg posts, there will be
"=A0" included? On rare occasions this occurs with Pangborn's posts
as well, but with Greg it's nearly every post.
Anyone have any idea as to what is causing it?
Greg, are you having computer problems that could explain it?
>
>Moe wants a SCAN and she wants it NOW! LOL
Outside of your drug induced hysteria, Moe made no such demand.
>
>Send it to her in TEXT format!
Um, JPGs aren't a text document, dullard. Unless you mean yEnc or
UUE. They are the most common formats used on Usenet for posting
files.
Last I knew, and I admit it's been YEARS since I last looked into
it, mime or Base 64 was most common in E-mail. I know that when I
send an image, it gets to the intended party, so the finer details
don't matter much to me anymore.
>
>LOL
>
>You know, Ken, somebody once sent Dan
>pictures from his colonoscopy!
Do I dare to ask how you would know such a thing, pretending your
claim is true?
>
>I bet you are developing an appreciation of why!
Ken can only develop an appreciation for refreshing Coors light.
Yes, I still think the audio is funny. Yes, I am easily amused
(as if my lame jokes didn't prove that truth long ago).