It has been reported by many news agencies that the US airforces attacked a village yesterday and killed over one hundred civilians in the village. One of these reports is on the following link at the UK newspaper, the Times.
As usual, the US says the village had Al-Qaeda and Taliban commanders. The fool people will believe that, without even asking simple questions such as "Who are those commanders? Can you name one of them? Who is controlling that village? Is it Taliban or the new US installed govt.?"
This type of mass murdering has happened many times so far. A few days ago, another village in Kabul has been equalized with the ground level. And before that, convey of vehicles has been eliminated, killing over 60 civilians, and many, many more.
Now I am not writing this article to complain about this dirty US act. This is a standard US policy and will never change. I am just wondering about the international human right organizations. Where are they? They haven't even sent their people there to investigate these US crimes. We have seen them condemning Taliban for preventing women from going to school. Why they are not condemning the US for killing these women? Taliban has said that they cannot educate them for financial reasons. But this excuse was not accepted. Now they are not even asking the US to give any excuse for killing them.
What a miserable world we are living in. Poor Afghan people do not have any value. No body bothers about them. Or even ask the question why they are killed. It is okay. Their blood is cheap and their lives are even cheaper. As long as the US remains in the driving seat and the whole world is following it blindly, this human misery will continue.
Wait a minute. For all third world poor people, don't give up hope. Soon you will have all the rights that you have dreamed of for very long time. Just support Osama bin Laden. He is the one who is going to destroy this evil country. A few years ago, when the US attacked his bases in Afghanistan with Tomahawk Missiles, he said he would make the US cry blood for what she did. And he did it. Now he is saying he is going to destroy the US. I believe he will be able to do it.
This man is a brain and the US govt. is stupid. The US is like a blind child carrying a gun and shooting on everybody. Or like a Spanish ox that tries to run behind everybody and finally gets beaten up. Fools always loose, no matter how strong they are.
In article <70ceae71.0201010940.6e8f5...@posting.google.com>, Daylight
<daylight80...@yahoo.com> wrote: > It has been reported by many news agencies that the US airforces > attacked a village yesterday and killed over one hundred civilians in > the village. One of these reports is on the following link at the UK > newspaper, the Times.
> As usual, the US says the village had Al-Qaeda and Taliban commanders. > The fool people will believe that, without even asking simple > questions such as "Who are those commanders? Can you name one of them? > Who is controlling that village? Is it Taliban or the new US installed > govt.?"
drivel deleted
when all is said and done you will find America killed 1/100th of the innocent people that the taliban did. also wheras America would have done it by accident, the taliban did it for fun.
> As usual, the US says the village had Al-Qaeda and Taliban commanders. > The fool people will believe that, without even asking simple > questions such as "Who are those commanders? Can you name one of them? > Who is controlling that village? Is it Taliban or the new US installed > govt.?"
We don't have to reveal our intelligence and intelligence sources. We need to keep the information close to our vests in order to protect the good people of Afghanistan on the ground who provide information for us.
It should be obvious to the layman that peasant villagers do not fire shoulder-fired missles into the air so the place was obviously a hotbed on Al Qaida.
Also, it should be pretty clear that we can destroy any village we want if we so choose, so why did we destroy this particular village and not a hundred others in the area? Just to watch these particular villagers die and nobody else? If our goal was to kill Afghan villagers, hundreds of villages would be wiped out every single day. Therefore, it is pretty obvious that we are specifically hunting Al Qaida.
Mate, I have truly come to believe that the US believes it is above all forms of law. Because they have the most powerful offence in the world, they think everyone else agrees with what they are doing.
We must be pro-active and capture the American leaders (and soldiers) that are carrying out these atrocities before they can do any more damage. We must then PUT THEM ON TRIAL for what they have done so the entire world can judge them. If they have sufficient defence, they will be released, if not maybe we should execute them like the US government seems to enjoy executing others on death row who have committed equally abhorent acts.
> Mate, I have truly come to believe that the US believes it is above all > forms of law. Because they have the most powerful offence in the world, > they think everyone else agrees with what they are doing.
> We must be pro-active and capture the American leaders (and soldiers) that > are carrying out these atrocities before they can do any more damage. We > must then PUT THEM ON TRIAL for what they have done so the entire world can > judge them. If they have sufficient defence, they will be released, if > not maybe we should execute them like the US government seems to enjoy > executing others on death row who have committed equally abhorent acts.
I'm sure the belgium courts will be happy to host your kangaroo court when they are done with their sham trial of sharon.
> Mate, I have truly come to believe that the US believes it is above all > forms of law.
No, we are under God's law, but as the only remaining superpower in the world, we DO have responsibilities to the civilized world to make sure that militant Islam ceases to threaten the civilized world.
> Because they have the most powerful offence in the world, > they think everyone else agrees with what they are doing.
It is nice that the UN and NATO unanimously backs the US War on Terrorism, but even if they didn't we have the responsibility to stop militant Islam.
> We must be pro-active and capture the American leaders (and soldiers) that > are carrying out these atrocities before they can do any more damage.
Killing Taliban and Al Qaida is not "damage", it is "medicine".
Just what the doctor ordered!!
> must then PUT THEM ON TRIAL
Heh, heh ... the Taliban already tried that and now they are fried hamburger.
> for what they have done so the entire world can > judge them.
The Afghans are dancing in the streets with joy over the removal of the Taliban. I even saw footage of Afghan women KISSING THE AMERICAN FLAG in Kabul after their liberation from Muslim oppression.
On 1 Jan 2002 09:40:45 -0800, daylight80...@yahoo.com (Daylight) wrote or quoted :
>Wait a minute. For all third world poor people, don't give up hope.
I saw a documentary last night about slavery and how over the centuries nations have economically exploited each other for goods. This is normal for the human species.
We are gradually developing a conscience about it, just as we are gradually developing a conscience about mistreating other species.
We are redeveloping a conscience about killing civilians after Hitler taught the world it was OK, and everyone fell in line.
The home video recorder may be the tool that finally stops the practice.
At the same time we need to develop a conscience about overbreeding. If we persist in that, wars, famines and pestilence are a natural consequence.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
Joseph Bradshaw wrote: > Mate, I have truly come to believe that the US believes it is above all > forms of law. Because they have the most powerful offence in the world, > they think everyone else agrees with what they are doing.
Darwin calls it survival of the fittest. If you don't like it, but live in the U.S., then leave. If you live elswhere then believe what you want, but, by all means, stay there.
> We must be pro-active and capture the American leaders (and soldiers) that > are carrying out these atrocities before they can do any more damage.
We must be pro-active and rise up against cry baby liberals, such as yourself, who do not have what it takes to arrive at a real solution to a problem, yet scream their frigging mouths off anytime they disagree with someone else's solution. You and your type make me sick. The U.S. is supposed to ignore the atrocities of 9/11? Or perhaps the U.S. should have done nothing and waited for it to happen again? What do you suggest Einstein?
> We > must then PUT THEM ON TRIAL for what they have done so the entire world can > judge them.
We must commend them for exacting revenge for the attrocities of 9/11.
> If they have sufficient defence, they will be released, if > not maybe we should execute them like the US government seems to enjoy > executing others on death row who have committed equally abhorent acts.
They need no defense other then the God given right to defend their country and its values.
IMMIGRANTS, NOT AMERICANS, MUST ADAPT
I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some individual or their culture.
Since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, we have experienced a surge in patriotism by the majority of Americans. However, the dust from the attacks had barely settled when the "politically correct" crowd began complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others.
I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is seeking a better life by coming to America. Our population is almost entirely comprised of descendants of immigrants.
However, there are a few things that those who have recently come to our country, and apparently some born here, need to understand.
This idea of America being a multicultural community has served only to dilute our sovereignty and our national identity. As Americans, we have our own culture, our own society, our own language and our own lifestyle.
This culture has been developed over centuries of struggles, trials, and victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom. We speak ENGLISH, not Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any other language. Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society, learn the language!
"In God We Trust" is our national motto. This is not some Christian, right wing, political slogan.
We adopted this motto because Christian men and women, on Christian principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools. If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world as your new home, because God is part of our culture.
If Stars and Stripes offend you, or you don't like Uncle Sam, then you should seriously consider a move to another part of this planet. We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change, and we really don't care how you did things where you came from. This is OUR COUNTRY, our land, and our lifestyle.
Our First Amendment gives every citizen the right to express his opinion and we will allow you every opportunity to do so. But, once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about our flag, our pledge, our national motto, or our way of life, I highly encourage you to take advantage of one other great American freedom, THE RIGHT TO LEAVE.
> Mate, I have truly come to believe that the US believes it is above all > forms of law. Because they have the most powerful offence in the > world, they think everyone else agrees with what they are doing.
> We must be pro-active and capture the American leaders (and soldiers) > that are carrying out these atrocities before they can do any more > damage. We must then PUT THEM ON TRIAL for what they have done so > the entire world can judge them. If they have sufficient defence, > they will be released, if not maybe we should execute them like the US > government seems to enjoy executing others on death row who have > committed equally abhorent acts.
I have a couple of points.
1. If you think you can come over and arrest US leaders and put them on trial then do it, what is stopping you. Oh yes, its the fact that we have the strongest military in the world, so you resort to just whinning and crying.
2. What jurisdiction does the world have over the US, and exactly what moral authority do they claim. Maybe Zimbabwe president Mugabe will be chief justice on this court, since he has just a spotless human rights record (100,000 dead or missing). Maybe Fidel Castro can be the prosecutor, since he knows all about police states and silencing dissent. Maybe we can find The ortega brothers, leaders of the Sandinistas or Papa Doc the former leader of Haiti. Maybe we can hold this court in South Africa where hundreds of people are killed daily. Maybe Momar Quadafi and Saddem Hussein can testify against american cruelty.
> It has been reported by many news agencies that the US airforces > attacked a village yesterday and killed over one hundred civilians in > the village. One of these reports is on the following link at the UK > newspaper, the Times.
> As usual, the US says the village had Al-Qaeda and Taliban commanders. > The fool people will believe that, without even asking simple > questions such as "Who are those commanders? Can you name one of them? > Who is controlling that village? Is it Taliban or the new US installed > govt.?"
> This type of mass murdering has happened many times so far. A few days > ago, another village in Kabul has been equalized with the ground > level. And before that, convey of vehicles has been eliminated, > killing over 60 civilians, and many, many more.
> Now I am not writing this article to complain about this dirty US act. > This is a standard US policy and will never change. I am just > wondering about the international human right organizations. Where are > they? They haven't even sent their people there to investigate these > US crimes. We have seen them condemning Taliban for preventing women > from going to school. Why they are not condemning the US for killing > these women? Taliban has said that they cannot educate them for > financial reasons. But this excuse was not accepted. Now they are not > even asking the US to give any excuse for killing them.
> What a miserable world we are living in. Poor Afghan people do not > have any value. No body bothers about them. Or even ask the question > why they are killed. It is okay. Their blood is cheap and their lives > are even cheaper. As long as the US remains in the driving seat and > the whole world is following it blindly, this human misery will > continue.
> Wait a minute. For all third world poor people, don't give up hope. > Soon you will have all the rights that you have dreamed of for very > long time. Just support Osama bin Laden. He is the one who is going to > destroy this evil country. A few years ago, when the US attacked his > bases in Afghanistan with Tomahawk Missiles, he said he would make the > US cry blood for what she did. And he did it. Now he is saying he is > going to destroy the US. I believe he will be able to do it.
> This man is a brain and the US govt. is stupid. The US is like a blind > child carrying a gun and shooting on everybody. Or like a Spanish ox > that tries to run behind everybody and finally gets beaten up. Fools > always loose, no matter how strong they are.
And you believe he will destroy the USA ?
With what ?
His smelly underarms ?
His heroin stash ?
The last sentence you make however is true , fools do always lose.
The fools however are actually the muslim idiots like yourself who support Bin laden.
Killing people is no moral problem for me if they are bin laden supporters.
So bring it on Daylight and all your backwards fundie friends as the USA has plenty more anti terrorist actions planned for you this coming year.
Feel free to join the party but don't expect to leave it in one piece, just like what happened to the Taliban.
> It has been reported by many news agencies that the US airforces > attacked a village yesterday and killed over one hundred civilians in > the village. One of these reports is on the following link at the UK > newspaper, the Times.
Joe, Human Beings are just another resource that this planet has to offer. All of this planets resources are for our personal use in achieving the collective goal of ManKind.
It has nothing to do with race, colour, creed, or religion. It has everything to do with production and consumption... whether it be intellectual, material, or 'spiritual'.
It is when a persons actions (not beliefs or stated beliefs) interfere, prevent, or threaten the human spirit (and it's ability to purchase and consume mass quantities) that the person becomes an 'undesirable' resource.
Now, you aren't trying to interfere in this endeavor are you?
> Mate, I have truly come to believe that the US believes it is above all > forms of law. Because they have the most powerful offence in the world, > they think everyone else agrees with what they are doing.
> No, we are under God's law, but as the only remaining superpower in the > world, we DO have responsibilities to the civilized world to make sure that > militant Islam ceases to threaten the civilized world.
America is no superpower, it is in decline, its decline can be measured in its total lack of morals.
You appear to be a Zionist funded heathen. The fear of Islam and its truth, is measured by the underhand and rather barbaric methods being used to suppress it.
Why is it that people like you, keep on forgetting that German christian killed 6 million Jews. Is it because zionist, agents like yourself are a bunch of whores.
> > Because they have the most powerful offence in the world, > > they think everyone else agrees with what they are doing.
> It is nice that the UN and NATO unanimously backs the US War on Terrorism, > but even if they didn't we have the responsibility to stop militant Islam.
Actually, the only other partner in this War against the Poor and non christians/zionists, will go down in history as the greatest crime against humanity the world has ever known.
You might have won the battle, but you have already lost the war.
> > We must be pro-active and capture the American leaders (and soldiers) that > > are carrying out these atrocities before they can do any more damage.
> Killing Taliban and Al Qaida is not "damage", it is "medicine".
The same way Christians Germans saw the murdering of 6 000 000 + jews as medicine. Interesting Jacob T.
> Just what the doctor ordered!!
> > must then PUT THEM ON TRIAL
> Heh, heh ... the Taliban already tried that and now they are fried > hamburger.
Just like 6 000 000 + jews who were gased at the hands of Christian Germans. Interesting.
> > for what they have done so the entire world can > > judge them.
> The Afghans are dancing in the streets with joy over the removal of the > Taliban. I even saw footage of Afghan women KISSING THE AMERICAN FLAG in > Kabul after their liberation from Muslim oppression.
> Face it ... militant Islam is now in decline!!!
I notice that you take the posters message out of the original thread and then replied to it.
Very clever, interesting that you need to do this, the original post was under the subject heading
'Killing Poor People Is No Problem - US Policy'
There is no such thing as militant Islam, but from your replies in this post I see that your bigotry and racism have reached a new level of rabidness.
From your post, you are a white Zionist Scumbag, but I could be wrong. I am sure you will confirm my hunch, by posting another crass erply.
> In article <70ceae71.0201010940.6e8f5...@posting.google.com>, Daylight > <daylight80...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > It has been reported by many news agencies that the US airforces > > attacked a village yesterday and killed over one hundred civilians in > > the village. One of these reports is on the following link at the UK > > newspaper, the Times.
> > As usual, the US says the village had Al-Qaeda and Taliban commanders. > > The fool people will believe that, without even asking simple > > questions such as "Who are those commanders? Can you name one of them? > > Who is controlling that village? Is it Taliban or the new US installed > > govt.?"
> when all is said and done you will find America killed 1/100th of the > innocent people that the taliban did. also wheras America would have > done it by accident, the taliban did it for fun.
By George F. Will Thursday, December 27, 2001; Page A23
"I fear the world will jump to the wrong conclusion that because I am in Atlanta the work is done. Far from it. We must kill three hundred thousand I have told you of so often, and the further they run the harder for us to get them."
-- Gen. William Tecumseh
Sherman, 1864
America's Civil War provides many analogies by which we measure -- and sometimes misunderstand -- today's military developments, and American ways of waging war.
Because facets of the Afghanistan operations -- real-time intelligence, stealthy aircraft, precision munitions -- are so modern, we miss the fact that the war requires an American tradition of warmaking that has a 19th-century pedigree. And the bloody uprisings by fanatical Taliban and al Qaeda prisoners underscore the pertinence of Sherman's understanding of how to define victory over an intensely motivated enemy.
When military operations in Afghanistan began, just four weeks after Sept. 11 and three weeks after Gen. Tommy Franks was told to begin planning attacks, some critics were quick to say the operations did not begin quickly enough. Then they said the tempo of operations was too torpid. Critics compared Franks -- and Colin Powell, ever mindful of allies' sensibilities -- to Gen. George McClellan. Those were fighting words, because McClellan was a reluctant fighter.
One of President Lincoln's commanders, McClellan was notoriously reluctant to close with Confederate forces, the strength of which he consistently overestimated. This drove Lincoln to distraction, and to sarcasm about hoping to "borrow" the Army if McClellan was not using it.
Sherman, an energetic user of the Army, believed its principal use against the Confederacy was not to occupy territory but to destroy enemy personnel. His reason for believing this has contemporary resonance during a war against fanatics, many of whom come from the privileged strata of corrupt and exploitative societies.
Long before secession, Sherman despised the South for its caste and class systems. In 1843, when stationed in South Carolina, he wrote: "This state, their aristocracy . . . their patriarchal chivalry and glory -- all trash. No people in America are so poor in reality, no people so poorly provided with the comforts of life."
So why did the Confederate army, composed mostly of poor whites, fight for a social system beneficial only to a tiny landed minority? Partly because of the elan of its martial elite, those whom Sherman called "young bloods" who were "brave, fine riders, bold to rashness and dangerous in every sense."
Sherman, writes professor Victor Davis Hanson in his book "The Soul of Battle," considered the Confederacy "a motley conglomeration of distrustful factions." Sherman thought the really dangerous faction -- dangerous during the war, and potentially afterward -- consisted of what Hanson calls "young zealots, men between 18 and 40 who often formed the cavalry of the South and were led by rabid knights like Nathan Bedford Forrest, Joseph Wheeler and Jeb Stuart. These fanatics . . . were the children of the wealthy, excellent horsemen, full of youthful vigor and insolence."
The South, although militarily weak, "fielded," Hanson says, "individual warriors who were among the most gallant and deadly in the entire history of warfare." Hence what Sherman called "the awful fact": Victory required "that the present class of men who rule the South must be killed outright."
Donald Rumsfeld says his preference is for al Qaeda fighters to surrender rather than fight to the death: "It ends it faster. It's less expensive." Gen. Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, says: "This is not a war of extermination." Such statements are perhaps obligatory and even sincere.
However, is surrender really less expensive in the long run? It is a reasonable surmise that a reformed terrorist is a very rare terrorist, and that the rate of recidivism will be high among terrorists who are forced to surrender but continue to believe they are doing God's will when they commit mass murder of infidels. So, as far as is consistent with the rules of war and the husbanding of the lives of U.S. military personnel, U.S. strategy should maximize fatalities among the enemy, rather than expedite the quickest possible cessation of hostilities.
Many Americans will vehemently reject any analogy between Confederate and al Qaeda elites. But Sherman might have felt vindicated by a postwar letter from one former Confederate general to another, D. H. Hill to Jubal Early:
"Why has the South become so toadyish & sycophantic? I think it is because the best and noblest were killed off during the war."
"Daylight" <daylight80...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> It has been reported by many news agencies that the US airforces > attacked a village yesterday and killed over one hundred civilians in > the village. One of these reports is on the following link at the UK > newspaper, the Times.
> As usual, the US says the village had Al-Qaeda and Taliban commanders. > The fool people will believe that, without even asking simple > questions such as "Who are those commanders? Can you name one of them? > Who is controlling that village? Is it Taliban or the new US installed > govt.?"
> This type of mass murdering has happened many times so far. A few days > ago, another village in Kabul has been equalized with the ground > level. And before that, convey of vehicles has been eliminated, > killing over 60 civilians, and many, many more.
> Now I am not writing this article to complain about this dirty US act. > This is a standard US policy and will never change. I am just > wondering about the international human right organizations. Where are > they? They haven't even sent their people there to investigate these > US crimes. We have seen them condemning Taliban for preventing women > from going to school. Why they are not condemning the US for killing > these women? Taliban has said that they cannot educate them for > financial reasons. But this excuse was not accepted. Now they are not > even asking the US to give any excuse for killing them.
> What a miserable world we are living in. Poor Afghan people do not > have any value. No body bothers about them. Or even ask the question > why they are killed. It is okay. Their blood is cheap and their lives > are even cheaper. As long as the US remains in the driving seat and > the whole world is following it blindly, this human misery will > continue.
> Wait a minute. For all third world poor people, don't give up hope. > Soon you will have all the rights that you have dreamed of for very > long time. Just support Osama bin Laden. He is the one who is going to > destroy this evil country. A few years ago, when the US attacked his > bases in Afghanistan with Tomahawk Missiles, he said he would make the > US cry blood for what she did. And he did it. Now he is saying he is > going to destroy the US. I believe he will be able to do it.
> This man is a brain and the US govt. is stupid. The US is like a blind > child carrying a gun and shooting on everybody. Or like a Spanish ox > that tries to run behind everybody and finally gets beaten up. Fools > always loose, no matter how strong they are.
> > Mate, I have truly come to believe that the US believes it is above all > > forms of law.
> No, we are under God's law, but as the only remaining superpower in the > world,
you are under Gods law, then you better pre-pare yourselves.
>we DO have responsibilities to the civilized world to make sure that > militant Islam ceases to threaten the civilized world.
> > Because they have the most powerful offence in the world, > > they think everyone else agrees with what they are doing.
> It is nice that the UN and NATO unanimously backs the US War on Terrorism, > but even if they didn't we have the responsibility to stop militant Islam.
> > We must be pro-active and capture the American leaders (and soldiers) that > > are carrying out these atrocities before they can do any more damage.
> Killing Taliban and Al Qaida is not "damage", it is "medicine".
Okay, I grant you that one. I love it when a plan comes together. I don`t like americas economic world plans and WHAM the temple of mercury comes tumbling down. I don`t like the taliban for destroying old artifacts and now they get their share.(and the treatment of people by them) It`s a win win situation, thank you God.Allah, Jesus, whatever.
> Just what the doctor ordered!!
> > must then PUT THEM ON TRIAL
Yeah, lets put everyone on trial, lets have a blast.
> Heh, heh ... the Taliban already tried that and now they are fried > hamburger.
Yep, lets see what i come up with next. Landing a airplanbe on a frontlawn was very tricky
> > for what they have done so the entire world can > > judge them.
> The Afghans are dancing in the streets with joy over the removal of the > Taliban.
Yep, everything falls into place.
> I even saw footage of Afghan women KISSING THE AMERICAN FLAG in > Kabul after their liberation from Muslim oppression.
Wow, yep, they must have been desperate.
> Face it ... militant Islam is now in decline!!!
I don`t know, I might use them again , they are so good followers.
> So bring it on Daylight and all your backwards fundie friends as the USA has > plenty more anti terrorist actions planned for you this coming year.
> Feel free to join the party but don't expect to leave it in one piece, just > like what happened to the Taliban.
Time for another educational lesson for america. It`s natures turn to hit america, they can`t send all their forces to fight the wind or the earth. 2002 will be a memorable year.
> > So bring it on Daylight and all your backwards fundie friends as the USA > has > > plenty more anti terrorist actions planned for you this coming year.
> > Feel free to join the party but don't expect to leave it in one piece, > just > > like what happened to the Taliban.
> Time for another educational lesson for america. > It`s natures turn to hit america, they can`t send all their > forces to fight the wind or the earth. > 2002 will be a memorable year.
So nature is going to terrorize the USA for fighting back against terrorists ?
> > Mate, I have truly come to believe that the US believes it is above all > > forms of law. Because they have the most powerful offence in the world, > > they think everyone else agrees with what they are doing. > Darwin calls it survival of the fittest.
Hmm, but that applies only to species, not to nations within the same species.
> The U.S. is supposed to ignore the atrocities of 9/11?
Of course not, that's just silly. Why would you suggest that?
> Or perhaps the U.S. should have done nothing and waited for it to happen
again? What do you suggest Einstein?
How about a non-violent defense? Too many of those Hollywood movies have gotten male hormones rife. According to Hollywood, the solution is to everything is to go around blowing up vans, and bringing down buildings everytime there's a dispute.
Shutting down suspect bank accounts as has been going on is a very good start.
> > We must then PUT THEM ON TRIAL for what they have done so the entire
world can judge them.
> We must commend them for exacting revenge for the attrocities of 9/11.
But innocent civilians did not cuase the atrocities of 9/11. What's wrong with a trial? If you're so cock-sure you've done nothing wrong, what have you got to lose?
> > If they have sufficient defence, they will be released, if > > not maybe we should execute them like the US government seems to enjoy > > executing others on death row who have committed equally abhorent acts.
> They need no defense other then the God given right to defend their country and > its values.
But defense does not include the murder of innocent civilians under any circumstances! An equal force to resist attack is quite acceptable (and indeed recognised in many countries' laws), but any more than 'reasonable force' constitutes an offence in itself - unless of course you believe you're above the law and that it doesn't apply to you.
> I am tired of this nation worrying about whether we are offending some
individual or their culture.
Why? We all live on the same planet as everyone else. If you don't take into consideration other nations and other people's feelings, they will probably come along and attack.... oh no, that's already happened, hasn't it!
> Since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, we have experienced a surge in
patriotism by the majority of Americans.
There has also been a severe increase in world-wide hatred towards the US, not least due to the fact that you've been killing innocent civilians - AGAIN!
> However, the dust from the attacks had barely settled when the
"politically correct" crowd began complaining about the possibility that our patriotism was offending others.
Well maybe you should listen to them then. If you cannot adapt to new situations and environments, you are doomed to extinction - that's Darwinism! Lol. Lol. Lol.
> I am not against immigration, nor do I hold a grudge against anyone who is
seeking a better life by coming to America.
Good. Because if you did, that would be racist.
> Our population is almost entirely comprised of descendants of immigrants. > This idea of America being a multicultural community has served only to
dilute our sovereignty and our national identity.
What are you ranting on about now? If the US population is 'almost entirely' made up of immigrants, then they ARE the national identity. You seem to be wanting to live in the past all the times. Don't forget, those that don't adapt, die. (Unless you're an innocent Afghan civilian, in which case you'll probably die anyway at the hands of US military aggression, er I mean peace-keeping missions, of course).
> As Americans, we have our own culture, our own society, and our own
lifestyle....
So does every other nation. Your point please?
> ...our own language...
Own language?
You mean the language they call 'American', er no. Sorry that's not right, is it? It's called English. Isn't that a place on the other side of the planet somewhere? Some island somewhere? Spoken by what, let me see now, there's also Canada, Australia, New Zealand, parts of Africa. Need I go on? It's also the primary business language of the world; and it's not called American!
> This culture has been developed over centuries of struggles, trials, and
victories by millions of men and women who have sought freedom.
So have a lot of other countries. You are nothing special.
> We speak ENGLISH, not Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian, or any
other language.
Oh, I'm surprised you haven't arrogantly changed it's name to 'American' yet. Still, I'm sure you will do given time. And if you're made up of so many immigrants, you must be speaking many languages, no?
> Therefore, if you wish to become part of our society, learn the language!
Maybe you should begin learning others' languages, that way you will begin to appreciate other cultures, and maybe begin to understand why 9/11 happened.
Integrate!
> "In God We Trust" is our national motto. This is not some Christian, right
wing, political slogan.
> We adopted this motto because Christian men and women, on Christian
principles, founded this nation, and this is clearly documented. It is certainly appropriate to display it on the walls of our schools.
Ah, now we come to the crunch of 9/11. A clash of religions. A clash of cultures. Each side refusing to embrace each other - indeed refusing to even acknowledge their existences unless forced to do so.
> If God offends you, then I suggest you consider another part of the world
as your new home, because God is part of our culture.
Why don't you change? Why are you always expecting everyone else to change to meet your expectations???
> If Stars and Stripes offend you, or you don't like Uncle Sam, then you
should seriously consider a move to another part of this planet.
Why don't you learn to live alongside other people, instead of pushing them apart?
> We are happy with our culture and have no desire to change....
Lol. Since when did you start speaking for every other person on the continent?
> and we really don't care how you did things where you came from. This is
OUR COUNTRY, our land, and our lifestyle.
You sound like you're about to go sit in the corner and sulk! Is you bottom lip quivering because you're not getting your own way anymore. Ah.
> Our First Amendment gives every citizen the right to express > his opinion and we will allow you every opportunity to do so. But, > once you are done complaining, whining, and griping about our flag, > our pledge, our national motto, or our way of life, I highly encourage > you to take advantage of one other great American freedom, > THE RIGHT TO LEAVE.
Why? What are you going to do? Have me beaten up if I don't go?
> It should be obvious to the layman that peasant villagers do not fire > shoulder-fired missles into the air so the place was obviously a hotbed on > Al Qaida.
This is Afghanistan not the United States of America we are talking about. Nothing is so clear.
> > > So bring it on Daylight and all your backwards fundie friends as the USA > > has > > > plenty more anti terrorist actions planned for you this coming year.
> > > Feel free to join the party but don't expect to leave it in one piece, > > just > > > like what happened to the Taliban.
> > Time for another educational lesson for america. > > It`s natures turn to hit america, they can`t send all their > > forces to fight the wind or the earth. > > 2002 will be a memorable year.
> So nature is going to terrorize the USA for fighting back against terrorists > ?
Nope for first aiding terrorists when they fight their "enemy" and then turning against them.
> Very creative writing.
Yeah, i know, I just love those prophets that are mentioned in the book. They say those things so colourfull. Those days God was a righteous dude.
> > No, we are under God's law, but as the only remaining superpower in the > > world, we DO have responsibilities to the civilized world to make sure that > > militant Islam ceases to threaten the civilized world.
> America is no superpower, it is in decline, its decline can be > measured in its total lack of morals.
We have better morals than you Muslims and had to free the Afghan people from your vicious oppression. Now they dance with joy in the streets, and kiss the America flag.
> You appear to be a Zionist funded heathen.
No, a self-sufficcient Christain.
> The fear of Islam
We do not fear militant Islam, but are disgusted with its evil and therefore will destroy it.
> and its truth,
The folly and the hate of Islam is clear for all to see.
> is measured by the underhand and rather barbaric methods being > used to suppress it.
We will bomb your Muslim terrorists until they are all dead.
> Why is it that people like you, keep on forgetting that German > christian killed 6 million Jews.
It is we great Christians in America who destroyed Nazi Germany and bombed Japan into submission. Now they have reformed themselves, thanks to our leadership. The same will happen in the barbaric Muslim world, and we will FORCE you to beat your weapons into plows.
> Is it because zionist, agents like > yourself ...
God Bless Israel. You can't touch Israel because Israel is protected by the ALmight God. And it really angers you, doesn't it?
Enjoy! Because there ain't a damn thing you can do about it.
> > It is nice that the UN and NATO unanimously backs the US War on Terrorism, > > but even if they didn't we have the responsibility to stop militant Islam.
> Actually, the only other partner in this War against ....
Everyone supports us, even the Afghan people who KISSED the American flag when the Taliban were destroyed.
> the Poor and non-christians/zionists, ...
The terrorists aren't poor ... they have sugar daddy Osama, or at least the y did until America came and kicked his wicked Muslim ass!
> will go down in history as the greatest crime > against humanity the world has ever known.
The world cheers America's War against Terrorism and rejoices with each new militant Muslim death.
Hallelujah!!
> You might have won the battle, but you have already lost the war.
We have one the battle, but haven't even warmed up yet.
> The same way Christians Germans saw the murdering of 6 000 000 + jews > as medicine. Interesting Jacob T.
Christian America stopped criminal Hitler, not helped him, and he was no Christian.
Now you Muslims should kill your own criminal murderers instead of waiting for the great USA to do it.
> Just like 6 000 000 + jews who were gased at the hands of Christian > Germans. Interesting.
Christian America stopped criminal Hitler, not helped him, and he was no Christian.
Now you Muslims should kill your own criminal murderers instead of waiting for the great USA to do it.
> > Face it ... militant Islam is now in decline!!!
> I notice that you take the posters message out of the original thread > and then replied to it.
No, I just tailor the title to fit the content.
> Very clever, interesting that you need to do this,
Not clever, just more focused.
> the original post > was under the subject heading
> 'Killing Poor People Is No Problem - US Policy'
And that title itself was in error.
> There is no such thing as militant Islam,
Sure there is .. we just killed thousands of murdering Taliban Muslims, and will kill tousands more.
Get used to it.
> but from your replies in > this post I see that your bigotry and racism have reached a new level > of rabidness.
I am rabidly against racism and bigotry and defend liberation, freedom and truth.
> From your post, you are a white Zionist Scumbag, but I could be wrong.
You are wrong as usual.
> I am sure you will confirm my hunch, by posting another crass erply.
No, I will just correct the numerous errors and lies you just posted.
> > It should be obvious to the layman that peasant villagers do not fire > > shoulder-fired missles into the air so the place was obviously a hotbed on > > Al Qaida.
> This is Afghanistan not the United States of America we are talking about. > Nothing is so clear.
If they fire at US soldiers they will be "toasted".
It's as simple as that.
("you are either with the terrorists or with the US -- make your choice!")
> > > > So bring it on Daylight and all your backwards fundie friends as the > USA > > > has > > > > plenty more anti terrorist actions planned for you this coming year.
> > > > Feel free to join the party but don't expect to leave it in one piece, > > > just > > > > like what happened to the Taliban.
> > > Time for another educational lesson for america. > > > It`s natures turn to hit america, they can`t send all their > > > forces to fight the wind or the earth. > > > 2002 will be a memorable year.
> > So nature is going to terrorize the USA for fighting back against > terrorists > > ?
> Nope for first aiding terrorists when they fight their "enemy" and > then turning against them.
> > Very creative writing.
> Yeah, i know, I just love those prophets that are mentioned in the book. > They say those things so colourfull. Those days God was a righteous dude.
What book are you talking about , a superman comic ?
Do you think you are somehow a prophet ?
So I guess when a tornado hits Arkansas , you will think a 'god' is responsible. Feel free to continue with your delusions with reards to why 'natural diasaters' will occur in the future.