Welch Couldn't Find His Ass in the Dark--(with both hands)
econtv
> >guy whose notes you wouldn't look at.
>
> s, Hopsicker, when they
> were right there on the table in front of you? How come you never
> answer this question?
> Billy
>
> VRWC fronteer
> http://www.mindspring.com/~wjb3/promise.html
I have received email asking me to respond to a query about welch.
okay. i'll do it, for my correspondent. and it figures it would be
crypoto-fascist roy-cohn wanna-be beck who brings it up.
Perhaps if he learned to use english. When heu says,
"Why weren't you interested in Welch's file?" what, specifically, are
you
talking about.
when he says, "Don't you think it's a little weird for you to
> come around asking about Welch's veracity *now*?" to what statement of mine do
you refer?
--
Daniel Hopsicker
http://www.madcowprod.com
The DrugMoney Times copyright 1998
A Caught Holding Company
"ALL THE NEWS THAT'S RIPPED FROM PRINT!"
--
Daniel Hopsicker
http://www.madcowprod.com
The DrugMoney Times copyright 1998
A Caught Holding Company
"ALL THE NEWS THAT'S RIPPED FROM PRINT!"
j...@inxpress.net
<zotzed>
Let's get this straight.
You set up the "Mena Summit."
You got to interview Russell Welch and Billy Bottoms.
Russell Welch offered to show you his case notes.
You rejected what Welch told you.
You rejected what Bottoms told you.
You weren't interested in looking at case notes.
You became upset that you weren't going to be able to
tell the story that wanted to tell.
Then you decided that you'd tell it anyway, even if it
was pure fantasy.
Now you look like a self-serving, dishonest, pigfucker asshole,
which is precisely what you are. At least you've managed to
document *that*.
Bear Bottoms
econtv wrote in message <35E74DBE...@earthlink.net>...
So now you expect to regain credibility by saying
"Welch couldn't find his ass in the dark -- (with both hands)"
You are pathetic Hopsucker...Spammaster -- Acid burned out brain.
Wassamatter Hoppy...too many holes blown in your pathetic
inanity fiction proposed to be the *real* truth. Not on
this planet.
Bear Bottoms
Billy Beck wrote in message <35e76714...@news.mindspring.com>...
>
>econtv <eco...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>>> >You remember him, don't you, Hopsucker? He's the
>>> >guy whose notes you wouldn't look at.
>>>
>>> s, Hopsicker, when they
>>> were right there on the table in front of you? How come you never
>>> answer this question?
>>> Billy
>
>>
>>okay. i'll do it, for my correspondent. and it figures it would be
>>crypoto-fascist roy-cohn wanna-be beck who brings it up.
>>
>>Perhaps if he learned to use english. When heu says,
>>"Why weren't you interested in Welch's file?" what, specifically, are
>>you talking about.
>
>
> That you were in Russell Welch's home to interview him?
>
> That he presented for your inspection his complete investigative
>file on his kitchen table?
>
> That you did not examine it?
>
> Is that your story?
I was there. I will vouch that Hopsucker was not even
curious. To be clear...he did not so much as look at
them. I did. Welch was good. Louisiana could have
made good use of such an investigator.
econtv
>
> econtv <eco...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >> >You remember him, don't you, Hopsucker? He's the
> >> >guy whose notes you wouldn't look at.
> >>
> >> s, Hopsicker, when they
> >> were right there on the table in front of you? How come you never
> >> answer this question?
> >> Billy
>
> >I have received email asking me to respond to a query about welch.
> >
> >okay. i'll do it, for my correspondent. and it figures it would be
> >crypoto-fascist roy-cohn wanna-be beck who brings it up.
> >
> >Perhaps if he learned to use english. When heu says,
> >"Why weren't you interested in Welch's file?" what, specifically, are
> >you talking about.
>
> Are you going to sit there and deny:
>
> That you were in Russell Welch's home to interview him?
>
> That he presented for your inspection his complete investigative
> file on his kitchen table?
>
> That you did not examine it?
>
> Is that your story?
>
> Billy
>
> VRWC fronteer
> http://www.mindspring.com/~wjb3/promise.html
Russel Welch allowed me to take his 'files' back to Los Angeles,
where they were perused, and interesting items photo-copied.
When he had his hissy fit over the fact that I was interviewing
'spooks,'
as he called them, he requested the file back, and it was returned.
Should you be referencing anything else, you should know that 95%
of what he's got is not original with him.
Russel Welch is a far more complicated individual than he has been given
credit for.
When my book is published, the portrait of Welch you will see is
of a stubborn man whose persistence in the face of federal intimidation
qualifies him as an authentic American hero,
in a time where there were virtually none...
At the same time, Russel Welch is deeply flawed, both
in ways which are germane to the Mena coverup still going on, and in
ways which are not.
But, germane to the Mena Coverup, Welch is fair game, as are we all,
and will be judged by the verdict of history, the first drafts of which
are being prepared even now, Billy Beck, by your betters.
Bear Bottoms
Bear Bottoms
j...@inxpress.net wrote in message <35E782...@inxpress.net>...
>econtv wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> But, germane to the Mena Coverup, Welch is fair game, as are we all,
>> and will be judged by the verdict of history, the first drafts of which
>> are being prepared even now, Billy Beck, by your betters.
>>
>
>
>by a jury of your peers, in a civil suit.
Now now, don't scare him off...rope, more rope.
j...@inxpress.net
Billy Beck
econtv
promises, promises.
Bear Bottoms
econtv wrote in message <35E81F15...@earthlink.net>...
>j...@inxpress.net wrote:
>>
>> econtv wrote:
>> >
>> > j...@inxpress.net wrote:
>> > >
>> > > econtv wrote:
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > But, germane to the Mena Coverup, Welch is fair game, as are we
all,
>> > > > and will be judged by the verdict of history, the first drafts of
which
>> > > > are being prepared even now, Billy Beck, by your betters.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > If you make some $$$ on it, you're going to be judged
>> > > by a jury of your peers, in a civil suit.
>> >
>> > promises, promises.
>>
>
>oh puuuuleeeze, osmalov. we both know if you didn't have the net you'd
>be pulling
>a bottle of Old Crow out of your back pocket while staring morosely down
>into a hole
>in the ice.
>
>they don't get much more gs-puke than you, pal.
>
>i'm not impressed.
>
>
>--
>Daniel Hopsicker
>
>http://www.madcowprod.com
>The DrugMoney Times copyright 1998
>A Caught Holding Company
>
>"ALL THE NEWS THAT'S RIPPED FROM PRINT!"
You will be, I promise. Class action...it's in the mill.
econtv
Thank you. you made me laugh. CLASS ACTION??
The only class action you'll ever be involved in was called 'ditch day.'
j...@inxpress.net
>
> j...@inxpress.net wrote:
> >
> > econtv wrote:
> > >
> > > j...@inxpress.net wrote:
> > > >
> > > > econtv wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > But, germane to the Mena Coverup, Welch is fair game, as are we all,
> > > > > and will be judged by the verdict of history, the first drafts of which
> > > > > are being prepared even now, Billy Beck, by your betters.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > If you make some $$$ on it, you're going to be judged
> > > > by a jury of your peers, in a civil suit.
> > >
> > > promises, promises.
> >
> > Promise.
>
> oh puuuuleeeze, osmalov. we both know if you didn't have the net you'd
> be pulling
> a bottle of Old Crow out of your back pocket while staring morosely down
> into a hole
> in the ice.
>
> they don't get much more gs-puke than you, pal.
>
> i'm not impressed.
Impressing you isn't on my agenda, Hopsicker.
Suing you is -- if you ever manage to get out debt.
And in the meantime, it pleases me to have helped
you prove yourself to be a mealy-mouthed scumbag
with nothing more than an agenda and an attitude.
Bear Bottoms
econtv wrote in message <35E865BE...@earthlink.net>...
>> >>
>> >> econtv wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > j...@inxpress.net wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > > econtv wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > But, germane to the Mena Coverup, Welch is fair game, as are we
>> all,
>> >> > > > and will be judged by the verdict of history, the first drafts
of
>> which
>> >> > > > are being prepared even now, Billy Beck, by your betters.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > If you make some $$$ on it, you're going to be judged
>> >> > > by a jury of your peers, in a civil suit.
>> >> >
>> >> > promises, promises.
>> >>
>> >> Promise.
>> >
>> >oh puuuuleeeze, osmalov. we both know if you didn't have the net you'd
>> >be pulling
>> >a bottle of Old Crow out of your back pocket while staring morosely down
>> >into a hole
>> >in the ice.
>> >
>> >they don't get much more gs-puke than you, pal.
>> >
>> >i'm not impressed.
>> >
>> >
>> >Daniel Hopsicker
>> >
>> >http://www.madcowprod.com
>> >The DrugMoney Times copyright 1998
>> >A Caught Holding Company
>> >
>> >"ALL THE NEWS THAT'S RIPPED FROM PRINT!"
>>
>> You will be, I promise. Class action...it's in the mill.
>
>
>Thank you. you made me laugh. CLASS ACTION??
>
>The only class action you'll ever be involved in was called 'ditch day.'
>
>--
David Ferrie or whoever and told him about your allegations.
He said he was interested in some aspects of who your sources
of funding were after he had a good laugh. I also told him about
your black suburban story and he nearly wet his pants with laughter.
The only serious thing he said is something about "ducks in a row."
econtv
>
> econtv wrote:
> >
> > j...@inxpress.net wrote:
> > >
> > > econtv wrote:
> > > >
> > > > j...@inxpress.net wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > econtv wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But, germane to the Mena Coverup, Welch is fair game, as are we all,
> > > > > > and will be judged by the verdict of history, the first drafts of which
> > > > > > are being prepared even now, Billy Beck, by your betters.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > If you make some $$$ on it, you're going to be judged
> > > > > by a jury of your peers, in a civil suit.
> > > >
> > > > promises, promises.
> > >
> > > Promise.
> >
> > oh puuuuleeeze, osmalov. we both know if you didn't have the net you'd
> > be pulling
> > a bottle of Old Crow out of your back pocket while staring morosely down
> > into a hole
> > in the ice.
> >
> > they don't get much more gs-puke than you, pal.
> >
> > i'm not impressed.
>
> Suing you is -- if you ever manage to get out debt.
> And in the meantime, it pleases me to have helped
> you prove yourself to be a mealy-mouthed scumbag
> with nothing more than an agenda and an attitude.
i got an attitude, i got backers,a dni got a laweyer'll
kick your fucking drug-smuggler coddling
ass anytime anyplace--unlessd you'd rather i do it personally,
you fascist asshole.
econtv
>
> On Fri, 28 Aug 1998 23:24:16 -0500, j...@inxpress.net wrote:
>
> >econtv wrote:
> >>
> >
> >>
> >> But, germane to the Mena Coverup, Welch is fair game, as are we all,
> >> and will be judged by the verdict of history, the first drafts of which
> >> are being prepared even now, Billy Beck, by your betters.
> >>
> >
> >
> >If you make some $$$ on it, you're going to be judged
> >by a jury of your peers, in a civil suit.
> >
> >
>
> to do with anything that went on at Mena, be threatening Daniel Hopsicker
> with a civil suit. If Hopsicker were to publish something about Mena which
> was way off base, why in the hell should Osmalov care?
Because, as my 7th grade nun always told us, 'birds of a feather stick
together...'
and the 'threats' are just what the fascistii <do>.
it helps them compensate for their little dicks.
right michael?
econtv
>
> >> Are you going to sit there and deny:
> >>
> >> That you were in Russell Welch's home to interview him?
> >>
> >> That he presented for your inspection his complete investigative
> >> file on his kitchen table?
> >>
> >> That you did not examine it?
> >>
> >> Is that your story?
>
>
> No, he didn't, Hopsicker, and you and I both know it. I don't
> know what you took to L.A. (although I do know that Welch eventually
> saw through you enough that your relationship was over before he
> demanded that you send it back to him), but he never let that file out
> of his possession. It represented a capital investment in his very
> *life*, and he's smart enough to not let a creep like *you* get away
> with it. No, Hopsicker: you didn't even *look* at Russell Welch's
> investigative file beyond the effort to open the top folder with a
> thumb & forefinger and glance at the first page. It all happened in
> his home, and no place else.
>
> You completely stiffed a major investigative resource when it was
> right in front of you - where a *real* reporter would have put on a
> pot of coffee, rolled up his sleeves and gone to *work* - and then you
> had the nerve to ask him later about stuff like Weinberger's "Swiss
> bank account number" and whether he'd steal a DOJ document for you.
>
> That's because you're a *punk* who; A) can't pull your own
> weight, and B) isn't interested at getting at the *facts*.
>
> This...
>
> >When he had his hissy fit over the fact that I was interviewing
> >'spooks,' as he called them, he requested the file back, and it was
> >returned.
>
> the shit's going to fly every time you get your narrow ass busted on
> this point. That's right: Welch didn't "eat" the note, Hopsicker, and
> your cheesy little Bic & notepad strong-arm game didn't work on him.
> He threw your ass out into the data-ditch where you belong.
>
> >Should you be referencing anything else, you should know that 95%
> >of what he's got is not original with him.
>
>
> Billy
>
You and Roy Cohn would have made such a fun couple! Ah, timing!
--
econtv
>
> Billy Beck wrote in message <35e7f292...@news.mindspring.com>...
> >
>
this beck guy--does anybody else get that salieri vibe?
j...@inxpress.net
>
> On Fri, 28 Aug 1998 23:24:16 -0500, j...@inxpress.net wrote:
>
> >econtv wrote:
> >>
> >
> >>
> >> But, germane to the Mena Coverup, Welch is fair game, as are we all,
> >> and will be judged by the verdict of history, the first drafts of which
> >> are being prepared even now, Billy Beck, by your betters.
> >>
> >
> >
> >If you make some $$$ on it, you're going to be judged
> >by a jury of your peers, in a civil suit.
> >
> >
>
> Why would Michael Osmalov, a person who *presumably* had nothing whatsoever
> to do with anything that went on at Mena, be threatening Daniel Hopsicker
> with a civil suit.
For slander, peckerwood. And possibly for making threats.
> If Hopsicker were to publish something about Mena which
> was way off base, why in the hell should Osmalov care?
I'd care about that because I value the truth. But I wouldn't
be suing over it. I'd be riding his skanky back over it,
like I have been doing.
j...@inxpress.net
>
> j...@inxpress.net wrote:
> >
> > econtv wrote:
> > >
> > > j...@inxpress.net wrote:
> > > >
> > > > econtv wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > econtv wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But, germane to the Mena Coverup, Welch is fair game, as are we all,
> > > > > > > and will be judged by the verdict of history, the first drafts of which
> > > > > > > are being prepared even now, Billy Beck, by your betters.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you make some $$$ on it, you're going to be judged
> > > > > > by a jury of your peers, in a civil suit.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Promise.
> > >
> > > oh puuuuleeeze, osmalov. we both know if you didn't have the net you'd
> > > be pulling
> > > a bottle of Old Crow out of your back pocket while staring morosely down
> > > into a hole
> > > in the ice.
> > >
> > > they don't get much more gs-puke than you, pal.
> > >
> > > i'm not impressed.
> >
> > Impressing you isn't on my agenda, Hopsicker.
> > Suing you is -- if you ever manage to get out debt.
> > And in the meantime, it pleases me to have helped
> > you prove yourself to be a mealy-mouthed scumbag
> > with nothing more than an agenda and an attitude.
>
> i got an attitude, i got backers,a dni got a laweyer'll
> kick your fucking drug-smuggler coddling
> ass anytime anyplace--unlessd you'd rather i do it personally,
> you fascist asshole.
Keep it coming, psycho. Dig it deeper. You've been working
on your hole for way over a year.
j...@inxpress.net
>
> User of DOOM wrote:
> >
> >
> > >econtv wrote:
> > >>
> > >
> > >>
> > >> But, germane to the Mena Coverup, Welch is fair game, as are we all,
> > >> and will be judged by the verdict of history, the first drafts of which
> > >> are being prepared even now, Billy Beck, by your betters.
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >If you make some $$$ on it, you're going to be judged
> > >by a jury of your peers, in a civil suit.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > to do with anything that went on at Mena, be threatening Daniel Hopsicker
> > was way off base, why in the hell should Osmalov care?
>
> together...'
>
> and the 'threats' are just what the fascistii <do>.
Withdraw your various slanders, if you're concerned.
>
> it helps them compensate for their little dicks.
I'm not interested in your sexual fantasies, Hopsucker.
>
> right michael?
>
Bet your ass, Hopsucker. All of it.
Bear Bottoms
econtv wrote in message <35E8D406...@earthlink.net>...
>j...@inxpress.net wrote:
>>
>> econtv wrote:
>> >
>> > j...@inxpress.net wrote:
>> > >
>> > > econtv wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > econtv wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > But, germane to the Mena Coverup, Welch is fair game, as are we
all,
>> > > > > > and will be judged by the verdict of history, the first drafts
of which
>> > > > > > are being prepared even now, Billy Beck, by your betters.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > If you make some $$$ on it, you're going to be judged
>> > > > > by a jury of your peers, in a civil suit.
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > Promise.
>> >
>> > oh puuuuleeeze, osmalov. we both know if you didn't have the net you'd
>> > be pulling
>> > a bottle of Old Crow out of your back pocket while staring morosely
down
>> > into a hole
>> > in the ice.
>> >
>> > they don't get much more gs-puke than you, pal.
>> >
>> > i'm not impressed.
>>
>> Impressing you isn't on my agenda, Hopsicker.
>> Suing you is -- if you ever manage to get out debt.
>> And in the meantime, it pleases me to have helped
>> you prove yourself to be a mealy-mouthed scumbag
>> with nothing more than an agenda and an attitude.
>
>i got an attitude, i got backers,a dni got a laweyer'll
> kick your fucking drug-smuggler coddling
>ass anytime anyplace--unlessd you'd rather i do it personally,
> you fascist asshole.
>Daniel Hopsicker
>
I'm not one to usually assert my masculinity Hop'sicker'.
In this case, I would rather settle this one at high noon.
I would rather you try personally to kick my ass...I accept
the offer. Name the place...maybe you could sell tickets.
Name your backers, of course I have someone with
considerable skills and noteriety working on dat one.
De fat lady ain't sung.
Bear Bottoms
econtv wrote in message <35E8D905...@earthlink.net>...
be able to afford *real* shoes for your girlfriend from
this one my sicko. Talk about "birds of a feather"...at
least your girlfriend lies too.
Bear Bottoms
econtv wrote in message <35E8D759...@earthlink.net>...
>Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>
>> Billy Beck wrote in message <35e7f292...@news.mindspring.com>...
>> >
>>
>
>this beck guy--does anybody else get that salieri vibe?
>
>
>
>Daniel Hopsicker
>
Russ Welch which corroborates Billy Beck.
It is easy to show what you really are Hop'sicker.'
A sick man and a liar.
Billy Beck
econtv <eco...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>Billy Beck wrote:
>You and Roy Cohn would have made such a fun couple! Ah, timi...
Stick to the *facts*, Hopsicker.
Bear Bottoms
Billy Beck wrote in message <35e96c29...@news.mindspring.com>...
a fact would be to contradict himself.
econtv
>
> De fat lady ain't sung.
For once and inadvertently, you speak the truth.
I got surprises for your ass, Bottoms.
--
econtv
little head....and i'm sure your friends all like
you that way.
illy Beck wrote:
>
>
> Stick to the *facts*, Hopsicker.
>
> Billy
>
> VRWC fronteer
> http://www.mindspring.com/~wjb3/promise.html
Míké^%Schnęîder
> No, he didn't, Hopsicker, and you and I both know it. I don't
>know what you took to L.A. (although I do know that Welch eventually
>saw through you enough that your relationship was over before he
>demanded that you send it back to him), but he never let that file out
>of his possession. It represented a capital investment in his very
>*life*, and he's smart enough to not let a creep like *you* get away
>with it. No, Hopsicker: you didn't even *look* at Russell Welch's
>investigative file beyond the effort to open the top folder with a
>thumb & forefinger and glance at the first page. It all happened in
>his home, and no place else.
>
> You completely stiffed a major investigative resource when it was
>right in front of you - where a *real* reporter would have put on a
>pot of coffee, rolled up his sleeves and gone to *work* - and then you
>had the nerve to ask him later about stuff like Weinberger's "Swiss
>bank account number" and whether he'd steal a DOJ document for you.
>
> That's because you're a *punk* who; A) can't pull your own
>weight, and B) isn't interested at getting at the *facts*.
Regards Hopsicker:
Was he a dope from day one, or is he another of those net types who
used think straight, until he got too close to forbidden truths and then
suddenly started behaving strangely?
Enquiring minds want to know.
Email: Replace everything before the @ with "mike1" and delete any CAPS.
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
The tree, as tall as a fifteen story building, held at least a hundred
nests, with 60,000 or so bees in each one. Bahadur was amused by my
climbing gear, without which I could not scale such a tree. By contrast,
his bare hands and feet moved like a whisper over the limbs, every move
meticulous and full of certainty. I asked Bahadur if anyone ever falls
from the trees. "Yes," he said. "You fall when your life is over."
-- Raji Honey Harvesters, National Geographic, June 1998.
j...@inxpress.net
>
> In article <35e7f292...@news.mindspring.com>, wj...@mindspring.com wrote:
>
> > No, he didn't, Hopsicker, and you and I both know it. I don't
> >know what you took to L.A. (although I do know that Welch eventually
> >saw through you enough that your relationship was over before he
> >demanded that you send it back to him), but he never let that file out
> >of his possession. It represented a capital investment in his very
> >*life*, and he's smart enough to not let a creep like *you* get away
> >with it. No, Hopsicker: you didn't even *look* at Russell Welch's
> >investigative file beyond the effort to open the top folder with a
> >thumb & forefinger and glance at the first page. It all happened in
> >his home, and no place else.
> >
> > You completely stiffed a major investigative resource when it was
> >right in front of you - where a *real* reporter would have put on a
> >pot of coffee, rolled up his sleeves and gone to *work* - and then you
> >had the nerve to ask him later about stuff like Weinberger's "Swiss
> >bank account number" and whether he'd steal a DOJ document for you.
> >
> > That's because you're a *punk* who; A) can't pull your own
> >weight, and B) isn't interested at getting at the *facts*.
>
> Regards Hopsicker:
>
> Was he a dope from day one, or is he another of those net types who
> used think straight, until he got too close to forbidden truths and then
> suddenly started behaving strangely?
>
> Enquiring minds want to know.
From Day One.
I told Mr. Investigator my name, and he thought I was lying.
It went downhill from there, as soon as I emailed him that
he had a unique opportunity and ought to be careful to
present what happened at the "Mena Summit" as accurately
as possible. That made me a spook, you see.
Bear Bottoms
j...@inxpress.net wrote in message <35E9B7...@inxpress.net>...
That's *Mr. Invoostigator* or *Hopsicko* forever and ever.
He deserves the handles.
Bear Bottoms
Temper temper sicko.
Billy Beck
j...@inxpress.net wrote:
Dittoer. Of course,...
>I told Mr. Investigator my name, and he thought I was lying.
>It went downhill from there, as soon as I emailed him that
>he had a unique opportunity and ought to be careful to
>present what happened at the "Mena Summit" as accurately
>as possible. That made me a spook, you see.
..."Day One" kinda depends: everybody's had their own with the
guy. I had mine, but Welch's is pretty impressive, for all kinds of
obvious reasons.
Billy Beck
Míké^%Schnęîder
<nob...@intesis.it> wrote:
>On Fri, 28 Aug 1998 23:24:16 -0500, j...@inxpress.net wrote:
>
>>econtv wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>
>>> But, germane to the Mena Coverup, Welch is fair game, as are we all,
>>> and will be judged by the verdict of history, the first drafts of which
>>> are being prepared even now, Billy Beck, by your betters.
>>>
>>
>>
>>If you make some $$$ on it, you're going to be judged
>>by a jury of your peers, in a civil suit.
>>
>>
>
>Why would Michael Osmalov, a person who *presumably* had nothing whatsoever
>to do with anything that went on at Mena, be threatening Daniel Hopsicker
>with a civil suit. If Hopsicker were to publish something about Mena which
>was way off base, why in the hell should Osmalov care?
If I called you a pig-fucker, and you weren't, why should you care?
johnz
Actually, the White Russian's revenge is the "Leningrad" chapter of LOOK
AT THE HARLEQUINS.
JS