Democrats Should Announce that Election Fraud Will Be Investigated by a Democratic Congress
Gandalf Grey
Investigated By A Democratic Congress
By Brent Budowsky
Created Oct 17 2006 - 8:12am
Democrats in Congress today should send a message loud, clear and powerful
that this election will be conducted with integrity and fairness, and that
if either House of Congress becomes Democratic there will be a full subpoena
powered investigation of any form of election abuse this November.
Moreover, I would urge nationally important Democrats such as those who may
run for the Democratic nomination for president, Senators not running for
reelection, some Congressmen and women from thoroughly safe seats, and
nationally prominent lawyers to spend election day in key states, in key
precincts, as super-poll watchers in those states and precincts most prone
to abuse.
Lets make several things crystal clear:
1. There has been a recent history of voter intimidation, voter suppression,
and attacks on voting rights that are in clear violation of law. This has
been particularly true in African- American precincts and I predict it will
be true this year, because of the immigration issue, in Hispanic precincts
as well.
2. In state election after state election this year, there have been
repeated problems in many precincts in various states. Many of the machines
are new. Many of the formal election officials are untrained in these new
machines. There should absolutely be major efforts to secure paper ballots
and verification everywhere. There should absolutely be aggressive
pre-emptive efforts assuming that there will be problem areas on election
day, whatever we do.
3. For Democrats and others seeking an honest election, according to law,
where all votes count we can isolate a reasonable number of states,
districts and precincts where the danger of fraud or honest but incompetent
mistakes are highest. If we target the most vulnerable, and concentrate the
maximum resources, in the smartest manner, we can make a major difference
that could prevent enough fraud to affect control in both the House and
Senate plus possible governorships.
There are huge long term issues surrounding electronic voting, software that
remains secret, potential foreign influence, penetration for fraud, the need
for paper ballots that provide, at minimum, verification. The issue for me,
is, exactly what can we do right now, that is self-executing, meaning
Democrats can make it happen, that would deter wrongdoing, prevent
wrongdoing, and create maximum fast respond time on election day.
Two specific, actionable and aggressive moves immediately come to mind.
The first is that Congressional Democrats can announce immediately that
after the election there will be special congressional committee
investigation, with full subpoena power, with testimony under oath, with
full public spotlight, and with referral if appropriate for criminal or
civil prosecution based on any evidence or proof that is uncovered.
This could be a joint committee of Congress if both Houses become
Democratic, or it could be a special or relevant committee of one House if
either the House of Representatives or the Senate becomes Democratic.
Keep in mind, that while national Republican leaders would make national
plans, whatever they are, if there is any wrongdoing it would be implemented
on the ground by local election officials. It would be powerful medicine for
local officials to know, before and during election day, that they run the
risk of being subpoenaed for testimony under oath and possibly then
prosecuted for wrongdoing.
For a local election official, this is a very big deal. And, if local
officials are asked ahead of the election to cheat, or if honest local
election officials become aware ahead of the election, of efforts to cheat,
they would have previously named members of a previously announced post
election Committee to contact immediately.
The message is: to those thinking of breaking election and voting rights
act, dont do it. To those who spot suspicious activities in the works, call
this number in Congress and turn the bums in.
Also, even the most honest local election official will face problems of new
machinery and untrained officials in many precincts, and knowing that there
would be a subpoena powered Congressional investigation would give one whale
of an incentive, to go the extra mile before and throughout election day.
The second actionable proposal is to create super-poll watchers that would
be high level Democrats such as Senators not running for re-election,
Congressmen and women from safe seats, nationally renowned attorneys and
others, to spend election day monitoring key precincts in key states. We
should not wait, before the polls open on election day, we should have
fleets of well trained lawyers and high level Democrats everywhere that
danger might come.
The party and candidates will have their own very good poll watchers, but it
would empower them profoundly on the spot, to have major national figures
with them. This would serve three important goals.
First, on election day, lower level election officials who might be tempted
to cheat, would frankly be intimidated and deterred from cheating with high
level figures a few feet away. Second, if there are suspicious activities,
such as attempts to prevent African- Americans from voting, high level
figures would have major clout to stop it early in the day. Third, high
level figures would have immediate high level access to party leaders,
election day lawyers and the media to blow up any fraud attempts and rectify
problems ASAP.
They would report any irregularities early and immediately; initiate formal
legal action within minutes; have information broadcast on Air America and
radio and cable television; have the blogosphere spread it instantly; and
get polls reopened or action taken almost instantly. By ratcheting this up
to highest levels, we will identify the problems faster, and solve them with
immediacy.
Considering the historic stakes in the election, and the relatively modest
net number of those precincts most vulnerable to fraud, or most likely to
have honest mistakes that could be rectified quickly, the prospect of
aggressive congressional investigation after the election, coupled with
super-poll watchers supporting local poll watchers would have major impact.
There are many good ideas out there, my hope is that Democrats in Congress
could quickly move on the prospect of post election hearings and send a
powerful, aggressive and clear message.
This election must be honest,
The whole world is watching.
We are watching at the highest level.
We are prepared for early detection and instant reaction.
With a Democratic Congress it will be a new day for honest elections in
America.
If you try to cheat you will end up with your hand on a Bible, your
testimony under oath, and your butt in prison.
_______
--
NOTICE: This post contains copyrighted material the use of which has not
always been authorized by the copyright owner. I am making such material
available to advance understanding of
political, human rights, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues. I
believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107
"A little patience and we shall see the reign of witches pass over, their
spells dissolve, and the people recovering their true sight, restore their
government to its true principles. It is true that in the meantime we are
suffering deeply in spirit,
and incurring the horrors of a war and long oppressions of enormous public
debt. But if the game runs sometimes against us at home we must have
patience till luck turns, and then we shall have an opportunity of winning
back the principles we have lost, for this is a game where principles are at
stake."
-Thomas Jefferson
Harry Reid Land Crime Syndicate@dnc.org Dem Dirty Harry Reid Mob Ties
"Gandalf Grey" <ganda...@infectedmail.com> wrote in message
news:453654dc$0$5929$9a6e...@news.newshosting.com...
> Democrats In Congress Should Announce That Any Election Fraud Will Be
> Investigated By A Democratic Congress
>
Why ? democrat Electon fraud is already going on in Democrat counties .
Return To Index
Incidents Of Voter Intimidation & Suppression
(A) Five Democrat Operatives In Milwaukee Charged With Slashing Tires
Of Republican Vans On Morning Of Election Day (60) (Exhibit E)
On Monday, January 24, 2005, five Democrat operatives were charged
with felony counts of "criminal damage to property" for slashing the tires
of 25 get-out-the-vote vans rented by Republicans early on the morning of
Election Day. The vans had been rented by Republicans to help transport
observers and voters to the polls on Election Day. The five individuals
charged in the case were all paid Democrat operatives. Two defendants in the
case are the sons of prominent Milwaukee Democrats: U.S. Rep. Gwen Moore and
former Acting Mayor Marvin Pratt, Chairman of the Kerry-Edwards campaign in
Milwaukee. (61) The following is a list of the individuals charged with
slashing tires on the morning of November 2, 2004, and their connections to
the Democrat campaign in 2004:
Michael J. Pratt
a.. Paid $7,965.53 by the Democratic Party of Wisconsin in 2004
b.. Pratt's father is former Acting Mayor Marvin Pratt, who
chaired the Kerry-Edwards campaign in Milwaukee
Sowande Ajumoke Omodunde (a.k.a "Supreme Solar Allah")
a.. Paid $6,059.83 by Gwen Moore for Congress and the Democratic
Party of Wisconsin in 2004
b.. Son of U.S. Rep. Gwen Moore (D-WI)
Lewis Gibson Caldwell, III
a.. Paid $4,639.09 by Gwen Moore for Congress and the Democratic
Party of Wisconsin in 2004
Lavelle Mohammad
a.. Paid $8,858.50 by the Democratic Party of Wisconsin and
America Coming Together ($966 for canvassing work in June and July) in 2004
Justin J. Howell
a.. Paid $2,550.29 in 2004 by the Democratic Party of Wisconsin
(62)
According to the criminal complaint filed in the case, on the day
before the election, DNC consultant Opel Simmons witnessed individuals at
the Democratic headquarters in Milwaukee discussing a plan to go to the
Republican campaign office and cover it with yard signs, placards and bumper
stickers. They referred to their plan as "Operation Elephant Takeover."
However, upon learning that there were security guards at the Republican
headquarters, they called off the operation. (63)
According to the complaint, at about 3 a.m. on Election Day, several
people at the Democratic headquarters were gearing up for another project.
Some of them dressed in what was described as "Mission Impossible" type
gear - black outfits and knit caps. Simmons asked them what they were up to
and warned them about the security guard. One of them told Simmons, "Oh,
man, you don't want to know, you don't want to know." They were laughing and
joking and continued to tell Simmons that he did not want to know what they
were going to do. (64)
About 20 minutes later, the group returned to Democrat headquarters
very excited, saying things like:
a.. "They won't go anywhere now, man, we got 'em, we got 'em"
b.. "Man, I walked right past the security guard. He didn't even
know anything was going on."
c.. "That's 'cause, you know, I was acting all crazy, you know, I
was acting crazy. I even let him watch me piss." (65)
The group went on talking about the affair and described the sound of
the air escaping the tires. There was apparently much bragging as they
described their various roles in the escapade. Mohammad was the "deception
guy" who walked around acting drunk. According to the criminal complaint,
when Simmons asked them what was going on, defendant Michael Pratt told him,
"We got 'em. We hit the tires." Simmons told investigators that at some
point on Election Day a staffer at Democrat headquarters pulled an article
on the tire-slashing incident from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel's website.
Simmons said that upon seeing the article, defendant Lavelle Mohammad said
he wanted to frame it and put it on his wall. Simmons said he did not talk
to any of the other defendants about the tire slashing incident over the
course of Election Day. (66)
While the Kerry-Edwards campaign and state Democrats denied knowledge
of the plan to vandalize the Republican get-out-the-vote vehicles, the
vehicle used by the defendants was rented by Simmons, a political consultant
from Virginia working for the DNC in Wisconsin. According to the criminal
complaint filed in the case, Simmons told police that he had rented the
vehicle "to be used by his workers for their campaign activities." When
questioned by police on the night of November 2, Simmons said he knew that
five of his workers were involved in slashing tires at Republican
headquarters early that morning, and identified all five defendants to
police. (67)
In all, forty tires on 25 separate vehicles were slashed in the
incident causing $4,192.35 of damage to the tires, plus $1,125 in towing
charges. Since the damage exceeded the $2,500 threshold for a felony, the
five were charged with felony "criminal damage to property," which carries a
maximum punishment of 3 1/2 years in prison and a $10,000 fine. The five
defendants pleaded not guilty at their March 4 arraignments. (68) A trial
was originally scheduled for mid-July, but has since been postponed until
January 2006. (69)
(B) Court Issues Injunction Against Democrat Operatives Targeting Ohio
Voters With Phone Calls Providing Deceptive Information to Voters
During the U.S. House Administration Committee hearings in March 2005,
a common point of inquiry was the issue of phone calls made in an apparent
effort to misdirect voters. The committee's Ranking Member, Rep. Juanita
Millender-McDonald (D-CA), stated that Ohio voters were "disenfranchised"
when "voters were told . that the presidential election would be on
Wednesday the 3rd of November as opposed to November 2nd." (70)
Ohio voters who had identified themselves as Republicans received
telephone calls telling them that the election was to be held a day later
than Election Day, that their polling locations had been changed and that
they could only vote if they brought four separate pieces of identification
to the poll. This information was intentionally deceptive and intended to
direct voters to a polling place where they would not be able to cast a
ballot.
The Marion County Common Pleas Court issued a temporary restraining
order against the Marion and Greene County Democratic Parties, the Ohio
Democratic Party and America Coming Together (ACT) enjoining them from
making inaccurate and deceptive phone calls to targeted voters. (71)
(Exhibit F) The judge originally assigned to the case recused himself
because he had "personally received a phone call" like the one described by
the plaintiff in which incorrect information about date of the election and
polling place was given, a point he noted in the Judgment Entry he signed
effectuating his recusal. The Ohio Supreme Court appointed a visiting judge
to hear the case who then issued a temporary restraining order against the
county and state Democrat parties and against ACT. (72)
Judge David C. Faulkner ordered state and local Democrats and ACT to
stop their calls "misstating the date of the November 2, 2004 election" and
"directing [voters] to the wrong location to which they should report to
vote." (73) Faulkner's restraining order specifically stopped the Democrats
from the following activities:
"Any acts of interfering in any way with the rights of Ohio
registered voters to vote in the November 2, 2004 election, including, but
not limited to, telephoning or contacting in any way any such registered
voters and misstating the date of the November 2, 2004 election, directing
them to the wrong location to which they should report to vote, telling such
voters that they must bring certain documentation to the polls in order to
vote and suggesting to, telling or implying to said voters that there are
procedural and/or documentary hurdles they must overcome in order to vote in
the November 2, 2004 election." (74)
The Marion County Democratic Party provided an affidavit in the case
that explained its role in the matter. The affidavit, as completed by Cathy
Chaffin, Chair of the Marion County Democratic Party, explained that
Kerry-Edwards campaign staffers made the misleading phone calls blocked by
Judge Faulker's order. Chaffin stated in the affidavit that once she became
aware that Kerry-Edwards staffers were using her office space to make calls
giving "the wrong polling location" to voters, she tried multiple times to
get them to stop the calls, to the point of threatening to kick them out of
the office if the calls did not stop. Below are the key points from Chaffin's
affidavit. (75)
a.. The Marion County Democratic Party provided space to the
Kerry-Edwards campaign for use as its campaign headquarters.
b.. Ms. Chaffin became aware that Kerry-Edwards staffers were
placing telephone calls to voters and giving out voting locations and "that
the wrong polling location was being given."
c.. Ms. Chaffin called Kerry-Edwards campaign staffer Jim Secreto
and told him the activity must stop. She was assured that it would stop.
d.. A few days later, Ms. Chaffin learned that the phone calls were
continuing. She again told Mr. Secreto to stop and again was told that the
activity would cease.
e.. Finally, on Election Day, Ms. Chaffin learned that the telephone
calls were still being made. At that time, she told Mr. Secreto that if the
calls did not stop, he would have to leave Marion County Democratic
Headquarters. (76)
The case is still pending before the Marion County Court of Common
Pleas.
(C) Court Issues Injunction Against Democratic National Committee
Ordering It To Stop Distributing Intimidating Materials To Republican
Volunteers In Florida
On Election Day 2004, a Seminole County, Florida, court stopped the
DNC and state Democratic Party from "further intimidation" and dissemination
of materials that were "designed or intended to intimidate or unduly
threaten the activities of poll watchers" organized by the Florida
Republican Party. (77) (Exhibit G)
Florida law allows all candidates and political parties to have
observers in polling places to monitor the conduct of the election. Both the
Florida Republican Party and the state Democratic Party organized thousands
of volunteers to participate in the election observers in polling locations
across Florida. (78)
Under Florida law, the names and addresses of volunteer poll observers
are filed with election officials in advance of the election. The DNC and
Florida Democrat Partyic obtained these records on the identity of
Republican poll observers and sought to prevent them from volunteering by
sending them a letter threatening legal action against them personally. The
letter, entitled "IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE," stated that each poll watcher
receiving the document had "now been provided notice of the law." (79)
(Exhibit H)
Individual volunteers who received the letter threatening legal action
by the DNC went to court in Seminole County and obtained an injunction
against the DNC and the Florida Democratic Party. (80) Seminole Circuit
Judge Nancy Alley ordered the DNC, Florida Democratic Party and Democratic
Executive Committee of Seminole County to stop "further intimidation,
further dissemination of these materials . designed or intended to
intimidate or unduly threaten the activities of poll watchers who are duly
carrying out their responsibilities" granted under Florida law. The court
ruled that the flyer constituted a "misrepresentation of [poll observers']
legal rights and obligations." (81) The DNC sought an emergency appeal of
the trial court's order to the Florida Appeals Court but was rebuffed. (82)
(Exhibit I)
(D) Intimidating And Misleading Phone Calls To GOP Volunteers Made By
President Bill Clinton And DNC General Counsel Joe Sandler In Florida
In addition to the intimidating letters sent by the DNC to Republican
volunteers, the DNC paid for recorded phone calls to Republican poll
observers' homes in Florida featuring the same message that the court in
Seminole County found to be intimidating and misleading.
These phone calls were recorded by former President Bill Clinton and
DNC General Counsel Joe Sandler. The call from Sandler said, "Please be
advised that any challenge to a voter must be stated in writing, under oath,
and that you must have direct and first-hand knowledge of the voter's
ineligibility. Interfering with a citizen's right to vote is a serious
offense and swearing out a false statement is a felony. Violations will be
referred to federal and state prosecutors." The recording finished by
noting, "This call is paid for by the Democratic National Committee,
www.democrats.org, not authorized by any candidate." (83) (Exhibit J)
(E) Court Orders MoveOn.org To Cease Voter Intimidation And Harassment
In Ohio
On Election Day, individuals in Franklin County, Ohio, were threatened
and harassed at their polling places by agents of MoveOn.org after being
asked about their voting preference and revealing their intention to vote
Republican. Similar situations are alleged to have occurred elsewhere around
the state and prompted a lawsuit filed in the Franklin County Common Pleas
Court. Voters were intimidated by MoveOn.org in an attempt to dissuade them
from voting for George W. Bush or in an attempt to harass them after they
voted. (84) (Exhibit K)
Examples of such intimidation include one plaintiff who arrived at his
polling place and was called over to a table operated by MoveOn.org that
promised "Free Coffee." The plaintiff asked for a cup of coffee, was asked
if he would voter for Kerry, and responded that he would not. The person at
the table refused him a cup of coffee. The plaintiff then noticed that
particular individual and others standing near the plaintiff's car. When he
exited the polling place, the MoveOn.org table was placed in front of his
car, blocking his exit. When he asked them to move, the individuals harassed
him, took his picture and recorded his license plate. (85)
Another voter noticed a loud and boisterous gentleman at her polling
place wearing a "Voting Rights Staff" badge and standing well within 100
feet of the polling place. In fact, he stood right outside one plaintiff's
voting booth and told her that she only had a few seconds left and needed to
make her final vote. These plaintiffs sought, and received, a temporary
restraining order against MoveOn.org. The complaint has subsequently been
amended to include allegations of similar acts by agents of MoveOn.org that
occurred elsewhere in the state. (86)
(F) Ohio Court Ordered Democrat Polling Place Challengers To Remove
Deceptive Arm Bands and Badges
On Election Day, several Lucas County voters brought suit against the
Lucas County Board of Elections and Democratic challengers in the polling
place who were wearing armbands and/or badges identifying them as "Voter
Protection Staff," "Voting Rights Staff," and other similar terms. The Lucas
County Court of Common Pleas granted the temporary restraining order
prohibiting the use of such intimidating insignia. (87) (Exhibit L)
(G) Violence Against Republican Volunteers In Philadelphia On Election
Day
Philadelphia has a long history of vote fraud and intimidation. (88)
According to press and police reports filed on November 2, this past
election was no different. Reports indicate that Republican volunteers in
Philadelphia were violently intimidated by Democrat activists on Election
Day 2004.
One Republican activist, working as a Bush campaign legal volunteer to
monitor the vote in Philadelphia, was "cornered in a parking lot by roughly
10 large men, whom the police later identified as 'union goons.'" The men
tried to tip over the minivan the Republican attorneys were sharing,
"punching it relentlessly, breaking parts off and failing to drag us out,
they chased us in and out of the dense urban traffic." It took "a frantic
911 call and a police roadblock" to stop the assault, and the GOP volunteers
"had to be secreted out of town to safety by a police escort." (89) (Exhibit
M)
According to police reports filed after the incident, the union
members' SUV was a rental vehicle. (90) (Exhibit N) On Election Day, rental
vehicles were used all over the city "primarily by the parties . for
transporting voters and election monitors." (91)
(H) Union-Coordinated Violence And Intimidation Against Republican
Campaign Offices And Volunteers
On October 5, a Bush-Cheney campaign volunteer in Orlando had his arm
broken when trying to stop union activists from storming the campaign
office. This incident was part of a series of simultaneous demonstrations
coordinated by the AFL-CIO against Bush-Cheney campaign offices in 20
cities, intimidating campaign volunteers with violence and vandalism. In
Orlando, AFL-CIO members stormed and ransacked the Bush-Cheney field office
as part of what one local newscaster called a "coordinated attack against
the Bush-Cheney campaign." Protesters also defaced posters of President Bush
and dumped piles of letters on to the floor of the office. Several
protesters in Orlando faced possible assault charges as a result of the
incident. (92)
As part of the 20-city anti-Bush protest, more than 100 AFL-CIO
members "stormed" the Bush-Cheney campaign's Miami office and "pushed
volunteers" inside. Three dozen union members rushed a campaign office in
Tampa, shaking up elderly volunteers. (93) Union members staged an
"invasion" of the Republican campaign office in West Allis, Wisconsin,
where police were called after 50 activists "marched right in" and "took
over the place for about 30 minutes" with bullhorns and chanting. (94)
(I) Violence And Other Incidents of Intimidation
In 2004, Republicans were subject to an aggressive and sometimes
violent campaign of harassment and intimidation orchestrated by Kerry
supporters. At least three Bush-Cheney offices were shot at during the
election season. A swastika was burned into the front yard of a Bush-Cheney
supporter in Madison, Wisconsin. Other incidents included offices
burglarized, windows smashed, tires slashed and other property damage. The
following is a timeline of documented election-related violence and
intimidation against the Bush-Cheney '04 campaign and Republicans in 2004.
September 2, 2004: Gun Shot Fired Into Huntington, WV, Republican
Headquarters. (95)
September 3, 2004: Windows Broken, Anti-Bush Messages Scrawled At
Gallatin County, MT, Republican Headquarters. (96)
September 6, 2004: Huntington, WV, Republican Headquarters Egged. (97)
September 13, 2004: Swastika Drawn On Duluth, MN, Resident's Lawn,
Signs Also Defaced With Words "Nazi" And "Liar." (98)
September 16, 2004: Community College Professor In Florida Punched
Republican County Chairman In Face. (99)
September 22, 2004: West Elmira, NY, Resident Found Swastika Drawn On
Bush Campaign Sign In His Yard. (100)
September 23, 2004: Office Ransacked During Break-In At Vilas County,
WI, Republican Headquarters, Obscene Words And Graphic Pictures Sprayed On
Campaign Signs. (101)
September 26, 2004: Windows Smashed And Signs Stolen At Oxford, MS,
Bush-Cheney '04 Headquarters. (102)
October 1, 2004: Laptops Of Executive And Field Director Stolen From
Bush-Cheney '04 Headquarters In Seattle, WA. (103)
October 1, 2004: Swastika Burned Into Front Yard Of Bush-Cheney '04
Supporter In Madison, WI. (104)
October 2, 2004: Collinsville, OH, Resident Chains Down Bush-Cheney
'04 Signs After Several Signs Stolen And One Was Replaced With Kerry Sign.
(105)
October 3, 2004: Burglary At Thousand Oaks, CA, Victory 2004
Headquarters Where Bush-Cheney '04 Banner Was Stolen From Outside Premises.
(106)
October 5, 2004: Gun Shots Fired Into Knoxville, TN, Bush-Cheney '04
Office, Shattering Office's Glass Front Doors. (107)
October 8, 2004: Two Men Were Caught On A Hidden Camera Tearing Down
And Urinating On Bush-Cheney '04 Sign In Akron, OH. (108)
October 9, 2004: Oxnard, CA, Supporter Placing Bush-Cheney '04 In
Yards Verbally Abused, Knocked Down And Had Signs Stolen. (109)
October 9, 2004: Bush-Cheney Signs Near Vail, CO, Cut In Half And
Burned In "Ransacking." (110)
October 10, 2004: Office Windows Broken And Field Director's Laptop
Bag and Purse Stolen In Burglary At Canton, OH, Victory Office. (111)
October 11, 2004: Windows Broken, Petty Cash Stolen And Computers
Tampered With In Burglary At Spokane, WA, Victory 2004 Headquarters. (112)
October 13, 2004: Walls And Windows Of York, PA, Victory 2004
Headquarters Vandalized With Pro-Kerry Spray-Paint And Signs Outside
Destroyed. (113)
October 13, 2004: Window Smashed At Laconia, NH, Victory 2004
Headquarters. (114)
October 13, 2004: Kerry Supporter Caught Stealing Bush Sign In Cape
Girardeau, MO, Pulled Knife On Sign's Owner And Was Arrested. (115)
October 15, 2004: Someone Destroyed Large Plywood Bush-Cheney '04
Sign, Then Tried To Smash Debris Though Glass Door Of Santa Fe, NM,
Republican Party Headquarters. (116)
October 15, 2004: Someone Lined Window Sill With Bullet Casings At
Littleton, NH, Republican Headquarters. (117)
October 16, 2004: Unknown Suspects Vandalized Large Bush-Cheney
Campaign Sign In Hollister, CA, With Obscenities. (118)
October 17, 2004: Stickers Placed Over Windows Of Gettysburg, PA,
Victory 2004 Headquarters. (119)
October 18, 2004: Eggs Thrown At Keene, NH, Victory 2004 Headquarters.
(120)
October 18, 2004: 21 Protesters Arrested At Bush-Cheney '04 Campaign
Headquarters In Arlington, VA. (121)
October 20, 2004: Rocks Thrown Through Windows At Multnomah County,
OR, Republican Party Headquarters. (122)
October 21, 2004: Bomb Threat Made Against Lake Havasu, AZ, Republican
Party Headquarters. (123)
October 21, 2004: Windows Smashed At Multnomah County Republican Party
Headquarters In Portland, OR. (124)
October 22, 2004: Break-In Discovered At Cincinnati, OH, Victory 2004
Headquarters. (125)
October 22, 2004: Break-In Discovered At Flagstaff, AZ, Victory 2004
Headquarters. Perpetrators gained entry by throwing a cinder block through a
plate glass window. (126)
October 22, 2004: Chunk Of Concrete Tossed Through Glass Door Of
Republican Headquarters In Santa Cruz, CA. (127)
October 23, 2004: Two Kerry Supporters Arrested After Stealing
Pro-Bush Signs From Activist And Pushing Police Officer At Edwards Rally In
St. Petersburg, FL. (128)
Gandalf Grey
"Dem Dirty Harry Reid Mob Ties" <Dem Harry Reid Land Crime
Synd...@DNC.org> wrote in message
news:453657f2$0$29666$a82e...@reader.athenanews.com...
Democrats In Congress Should Announce That Any Election Fraud Will Be
Investigated By A Democratic Congress
By Brent Budowsky
Roedy Green
On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 09:23:49 -0700, "Gandalf Grey"
<ganda...@infectedmail.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted
someone who said :
>Democrats In Congress Should Announce That Any Election Fraud Will Be
>Investigated By A Democratic Congress
With Diebold fraud there won't be a Democratic congress. The time to
dig in your heels and destroy those infernal machines is NOW.
People are not nearly worried enough. There are MORE of those
dishonest machines. Further there is no redundancy in the accumulation
computers. They are just fraud-welcoming.
--
Canadian Mind Products, Roedy Green, http://mindprod.com
For links to books about George W. Bush see
http://mindprod.com/politics/bushbooks.html
B1ackwater
>Democrats In Congress Should Announce That Any Election Fraud Will Be
>Investigated By A Democratic Congress
Counting your chickens already ??? That kind of hubris
can cost you votes ...
IMHO, at this point in time, GOP and DNC election fraud
kinda cancel each other out. You'll know when there's
an imbalance because one side will consistently win
close contests against all statistics and common sense.
Hmmm ... now if the DNC sweeps next months elections, should
we automatically suspect fraud ? More 'liberal' hackers than
'conservative' ones ... all those Diebold machines out there ...
Gandalf Grey
"B1ackwater" <b...@barrk.net> wrote in message
news:45368d86...@news.west.earthlink.net...
> On Wed, 18 Oct 2006 09:23:49 -0700, "Gandalf Grey"
> <ganda...@infectedmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Democrats In Congress Should Announce That Any Election Fraud Will Be
>>Investigated By A Democratic Congress
>
> Counting your chickens already ??? That kind of hubris
> can cost you votes ...
>
> IMHO, at this point in time, GOP and DNC election fraud
> kinda cancel each other out.
Then you're stuffed to the nose with crap, my friend.
hob
This is evidenced by the number of RNC stomper-trolls who jumped all over
your thread - like you swatted a hornets nest.
Every right wing-nut poster is on your post's tail. It looks like a
convention.
You must have really scared the shit out of them.
"Gandalf Grey" <ganda...@infectedmail.com> wrote in message
news:453654dc$0$5929$9a6e...@news.newshosting.com...
Gandalf Grey
"hob" <deho...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:usKdnUNAnJ8kXavY...@comcast.com...
> You have probably hit on the only thing that will assure a fair vote
> count.
>
> This is evidenced by the number of RNC stomper-trolls who jumped all over
> your thread - like you swatted a hornets nest.
>
> Every right wing-nut poster is on your post's tail. It looks like a
> convention.
>
> You must have really scared the shit out of them.
That's the way it usually works. They've got nothing substantive to say so
they trot out the phony FAQs and the usual trolls.
Kurt Nicklas
Richard "Gandalf Grey" Hanson wrote:
> > Oh, come on. We're talking about Democrats,
>
> Yeah. The democrats who are going to impeach Bush and Cheney.
Ricky Hanson as he dreams himself to be: