The *Mysterious* Hugh Sprunt... Part 3

[Freedom]

You know - as I was putting the coffee on - and getting back to work.. I
thought - I could be wrong about all this.

You know what Martin - you are right.

I suppose - rather than sending this stuff out there - he should have
called people - demanded that they get it themselves - (if they could
find it in their hometown)

And when they didn't hop to it - and just carried on their merry way of
covering up the truth about Vince Foster -

He should have just stewed about it for weeks - gotten really
angry and accused everybody who didn't take an interest in his material -
of being involved in the cover up of the Death of Vincent Foster

Yeah.

What a moron - to send the Clinton camps enough stuff to keep himself
from being in danger - and to let them know that should they try anything
- they would be too late. He should have done a Jerry Parks.

Sheesh

All this while - I thought you were being cheap about buying a stamp
Martin...

Now I see - just how smart you were to keep your stuff to yourself.

Now that I have figured it out - can I have my special agent decoder ring
- I have 4 kellogs box tops and 50 cents. I am looking forward to using
it on your *Fog* posts - to discover the hidden smarmy things Hugh Sprunt
has been doing.

MW

[Martin McPhillips]

On Wed, 14 Jan 1998 23:09:21 -0800, laissezfaire*nospam*@usa.net (Freedom) wrote:

>
>What a moron - to send the Clinton camps enough stuff to keep himself
>from being in danger - and to let them know that should they try anything
>- they would be too late. He should have done a Jerry Parks.

Is that the proffer?

By that reasoning, 200 reporters would be pumping out
Foster stories to *protect* themselves.

And Jerry Parks was an inside player in *Arkansas*
criminality. To use him as an example to compare to
Sprunt is analogical folly.