Thursday, 8 May 2008

In the US and Britain, there is a campaign to smear anybody who tries to describe the plight of
the Palestinian people. It is an attempt to intimidate and silence – and to a large degree, it
works. There is nobody these self-appointed spokesmen for Israel will not attack as
anti-Jewish: liberal Jews, rabbis, even Holocaust survivors.

My own case isn't especially important, but it illustrates how the wider process of
intimidation works. I have worked undercover at both the Finsbury Park mosque and among
neo-Nazi Holocaust deniers to expose the Jew-hatred there; when I went on the Islam Channel to
challenge the anti-Semitism of Islamists, I received a rash of death threats calling me "a
Jew-lover", "a Zionist-homo pig" and more.

Ah, but wait. I have also reported from Gaza and the West Bank. Last week, I wrote an article
that described how untreated sewage was being pumped from illegal Israeli settlements on to
Palestinian land, contaminating their reservoirs. This isn't controversial. It has been
documented by Friends of the Earth, and I have seen it with my own eyes.

The response? There was little attempt to dispute the facts I offered. Instead, some of the
most high profile "pro-Israel" writers and media monitoring groups – including Honest Reporting
and Camera – said I an anti-Jewish bigot akin to Joseph Goebbels and Mahmoud Ahmadinejadh,
while Melanie Phillips even linked the stabbing of two Jewish people in North London to
articles like mine. Vast numbers of e-mails came flooding in calling for me to be sacked.

Any attempt to describe accurately the situation for Palestinians is met like this. If you
recount the pumping of sewage onto Palestinian land, "Honest Reporting" claims you are reviving
the anti-Semitic myth of Jews "poisoning the wells." If you interview a woman whose baby died
in 2002 because she was detained – in labour – by Israeli soldiers at a checkpoint within the
West Bank, "Honest Reporting" will say you didn't explain "the real cause": the election of
Hamas in, um, 2006. And on, and on.

The former editor of Israel's leading newspaper, Ha'aretz, David Landau, calls the behaviour of
these groups "nascent McCarthyism". Those responsible hold extreme positions of their own that
place them way to the right of most Israelis. Alan Dershowitz and Melanie Phillips are two of
the most prominent figures sent in to attack anyone who disagrees with the Israeli right.
Dershowitz is a lawyer, Harvard professor and author of The Case For Israel. He sees ethnic
cleansing as a trifling matter, writing: "Political solutions often require the movement of
people, and such movement is not always voluntary ... It is a fifth-rate issue analogous in
many respects to some massive urban renewal." If a prominent American figure takes a position
on Israel to the left of this, Dershowitz often takes to the airwaves to call them anti-Semites
and bigots.

The journalist Melanie Phillips performs a similar role in Britain. Last year a group called
Independent Jewish Voices was established with this mission statement: "Palestinians and
Israelis alike have the right to peace and security." Jews including Mike Leigh, Stephen Fry
and Rabbi David Goldberg joined. Phillips swiftly dubbed them "Jews For Genocide", and said
they "encourage" the "killers" of Jews. Where does this come from? She says the Palestinians
are an "artificial" people who can be collectively punished because they are "a terrorist
population". She believes that while "individual Palestinians may deserve compassion, their
cause amounts to Holocaust denial as a national project". Honest Reporting quotes Phillips as a
model of reliable reporting.

These individuals spray accusations of anti-Semitism so liberally that by their standards, a
majority of Jewish Israelis have anti-Semitic tendencies. Dershowitz said Jimmy Carter's
decision to speak to the elected Hamas government "border[ed] on anti-Semitism." A Ha'aretz
poll last month found that 64 per cent of Israelis want their government to do just that.

As US President, Jimmy Carter showed his commitment to Israel by giving it more aid than
anywhere else and brokering the only peace deal with an Arab regime the country has ever
enjoyed. He also wants to see a safe and secure Palestine alongside it – so last year he wrote
a book called Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid. It is a bland and factual canter through the
major human rights reports. There is nothing there you can't read in the mainstream Israeli
press every day. Carter's comparison of life on the West Bank (not within Israel) to Apartheid
South Africa is not new. The West Bank is ruled in the interests of a small Jewish minority; it
is bisected by roads for the Jewish settlers from which Palestinians are banned. The Israeli
human rights group B'tselem says this "bears striking similarities to the racist Apartheid
regime". Yet for repeating these facts in the US, Carter has widely called "a racist". Several
universities have even refused to let the ex-President speak to their students.

These campus battles often succeed. Norman Finkelstein is a political scientist in the US whose
parents were both Jewish survivors of the Warsaw ghetto and the Nazi concentration camps. They
lost every blood relative. He made his reputation exposing a hoax called From Time Immemorial
by Joan Peters which claimed that Palestine was virtually empty when Zionist settlers arrived,
and the people claiming to be Palestinians were mostly impostors who had come from local areas
to cash in. Finkelstein showed it to be scarred by falsified figures and gross misreading of
sources. From that moment on, he was smeared as an anti-Semite by those who had lauded the
book. But it was when Finkelstein revealed two years ago that Alan Dershowitz had, without
acknowledgement, drawn wholesale from Peters' hoax for his book The Case For Israel, that the
worst began. Dershowitz campaigned to make sure Finkelstein was denied tenure at his
university. He even claimed that Finkelstein's mother – who made it through Maidenek and two
slave-labour camps – had collaborated with the Nazis. The campaign worked. Finkelstein was let
go by De Paul University, simply for speaking the truth.

Are the likes of Dershowitz and Phillips and Honest Reporting becoming more shrill because they
can sense they are losing the argument? Liberal Jews – the majority – are now setting up rivals
to the hard-right organisations they work with, because they believe this campaign of
demonisation is damaging us all. It damages the Palestinians, because it prevents honest
discussion of their plight. It damages the Israelis, because it pushes them further down an
aggressive and futile path. And it damages diaspora Jews, because it makes real anti-Semitism
harder to deal with.

We need to look the witch-hunters in the eye and say, as Joseph Welch said to Joe McCarthy
himself: "You've done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir, at long last? H ave you left
no sense of decency?"

http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/johann-...