In article <fcf1108e-5a64-4ae9-8a8b-
2bed7a...@googlegroups.com>
lady...@comcast.net wrote:
>
> On Thursday, May 24, 2012 5:18:44 PM UTC-4, RedDog wrote:
>
> >
> > You lying little liberal cunt.
>
> Look out ladies and gents, we got a badass over here! Sunshine, calling a woman "cunt" makes you look like a retard.
If the panties fit...
> > Dogs were certainly NOT domesticated
> > for "food purposes".
>
> Actually there is a great deal of supportive evidence that they were, in fact, domesticated for food purposes in parts of the world.
By Chinks and other slants.
> > Do you know anything at all about evolutionary
> > anthropology? ...
>
> I have a degree in anthropology. Do you?
Chemical engineering pays more.
> > No, of course you don't,
>
> And you know the education of a perfect stranger on the internet how exactly? :)
We don't need to know that, do we -> "Kat" <- ?
> > but like all liberal liars,
>
> Oh noes, the big man who called a woman "cunt" is now calling me a liar! Whatever shall I do? BWAHAHAHA
If the panties fit...
> > you don't mind distorting the truth if it will suit your anti-American
> > agenda.
>
> What anti-american agenda? Refuting lies and propaganda? Sorry dipshit, you have to do better than ad homs to refute me.