Karla Homolka loved animals? The Bestiality connection
BeautifulBrat4U
>From: Nickle Nickl...@finnex.org
>On 20 Aug 2001 18:18:19 -0700, rocke...@yahoo.com (Rocket) wrote:
>
>>On TV show I saw a while back that documented the two killers. They
>>showed a clip one of their home movies where Karla and Paul were out
>>back bye the pool. Paul was filming and Karla in her bathing suit was
>>playing with the dog on his back. Then a few seconds into the tape
>>Paul says a few words and Karla's hands move down instantly to the
>>dog's genitals and she Karla start playing with the dogs sheath!
>>Thats all of the clip they would show. While they were showing the
>>clip they made reference to Karla & Pauls high interest in bestiality.
>>As the police found nude pictures of Karla with different dogs and
>>commercial bestiality videos from Brazil & Holland. Also some of the
>>pictures they found were of the dogs testicles and penis in bondage!
>>Its clear Karla was not only interested in in sex with animals but
>>also torturing their genitals, CBT (cock & ball torture). As a
>>Veterinarian Assistant, Karla had access to a steady supply of animal
>>sex slaves. She could stay late and say she wold lock up and no one
>>would suspect what was going on after hours. Karl was also known for
>>bringing large male dogs such as Great Danes, home from work for the
>>weekend and was often seen walk these large breeds. Why allways big
>>dogs? Karl knew from work that the larger the breed the bigger the
>>male dog's penis and knot size. Interesting that along with othe
>>bondage devices that police found in their home were CBT devices. You
>>can be sure they weren' t for torturing Paul's cock & balls. when
>>police checked the hair that was in these devices thing that they had
>>evidence that the two had male slaves at one time for torture victims
>>were surprised to find out that it wasn't human hair! When they were
>>tightening the devices around their dogs genitals small bits of the
>>dogs fur would be trapped in the leather part of the harness. Also,
>>police found a strange box that Karl had. When they opened it
>>contained these unusual bones. When they brought it to forensics they
>>discovered to there shock! That the bones were actualy the penis bones
>>of male dogs, that they kept as trophies!
>>
>>There is more info on Karla & her pets if you want me to post more.
>
All of this is false!! Karla & Paul were not into bestiality.
Gary Zone
Whether or not this is true, I think we can all agree that they ARE
beasts!!!!!!
Gary
kieren shea
penises, they obviously added the last bit for shock value, but it is all
crap, and should be in an urban folklaw newsgroup. I'm from Australia, and
don't know the 2 people mentioned in the story, but it wreaks of amateur
journalism.
Gary Zone <gz...@your.pants.home.com> wrote in message
news:35Ok7.157167$sM.43...@news2.rdc1.ab.home.com...
Mr. E. Lurker
"kieren shea" <Kiere...@bigpond.com> said:
> Of course this must be false, NO penis has bones in it, this includes
> dogs penises, they obviously added the last bit for shock value, but
> it is all crap, and should be in an urban folklaw newsgroup. I'm
> from Australia, and don't know the 2 people mentioned in the story,
> but it wreaks of amateur journalism.
You are of course VERY wrong about that. There are species of animals
that do indeed have bones in the penis.
www.urolog.nl/patienten-eng/penis.asp
So, now that your accuracy has been established as not perfect, and since
you admit you don't know anything about these two subhumans, how about
you learn how to do some basic research before you decide to jump into a
discussion that you know nothing about? That sound okay with you?
kieren shea
claims as well, so I 'spose I'll just take your word for it then shall I?
And simply because you do not like the 2 criminals mention in the story,
does not mean that every article written about them is going to be true,
welcome to the real world... I'll enquire with a vet to see if a dogs are
one of the species mentioned, and if they do not, and you are WRONG, then
you will have as much credibility as the original writer of the article...
Thanks and enjoy the rest of your day.
Take care, hope to chat with you real soon.
Mr. E. Lurker <MrELurker@n0n3> wrote in message
news:9n1248$5k4$0...@dosa.alt.net...
Whiskey Agogo
there? I think you need to post that penis bone chart. And while extremely
rare, some humans do have penis bones. Harry Back is a case in point...why
do you think he's so popular with the ladies... ;)
Mr. E. Lurker wrote in message <9n1248$5k4$0...@dosa.alt.net>...
Joe Here
<Kiere...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>No not OK at all, and you have offered no proof to refute or back up your
>claims as well, so I 'spose I'll just take your word for it then shall I?
>And simply because you do not like the 2 criminals mention in the story,
>does not mean that every article written about them is going to be true,
>welcome to the real world... I'll enquire with a vet to see if a dogs are
>one of the species mentioned, and if they do not, and you are WRONG, then
>you will have as much credibility as the original writer of the article...
>Thanks and enjoy the rest of your day.
>Take care, hope to chat with you real soon.
>
Ahem...
I'm no expert on the subject, but a quick Google search (dog, penis,
bone) would appear to substantiate the claim that dogs do indeed have
bones in their penises. There are many sites available. Try this for
starters:
http://trc.ucdavis.edu/mjguinan/apc100/modules/Reproductive/mammal/penis0/penis.html
Can't wait to hear what Ms. Shea's vet told her????
Stay away from the sheep, Sheila : )
tory
sites auctioning moutain man toothpicks and raccoon cocks so
expeditiously... i wouldn't be so critical. ;)
incidentally, there is a curio shop in seattle right on the pier that sports
all sorts of oddities... one being a whale pecker. if y'all ever get to
seattle you should check it out.... if not for the whale prick then for the
shrunken heads at least..
"Pecker Checker" <pc...@mediaone.net> wrote in message
news:sseapt8pkmahell7b...@5xg.com...
> On Tue, 4 Sep 2001 07:57:53 +1000, "kieren shea" <Kiere...@bigpond.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Of course this must be false, NO penis has bones in it, this includes
dogs
> >penises, they obviously added the last bit for shock value, but it is all
> >crap, and should be in an urban folklaw newsgroup. I'm from Australia,
and
> >don't know the 2 people mentioned in the story, but it wreaks of amateur
> >journalism.
>
> Your problem is "You're from OZ!" You gimps are not noted for your
> knowledge. Take a look at this eBay site and then tell Crocodile Dundee,
> "Now that's a dick bone!"
> http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=1187178937
cy...@tiny.net.invalid
>
>Can't wait to hear what Ms. Shea's vet told her????
>Stay away from the sheep, Sheila : )
>
Sites I found said it's only found in male mammals who are predators.
Leaves the poor sheep out.
--
rbc: vixen Fairly harmless
remove invalid or hit reply to email.
Though I'm very slow to respond.
http://www.visi.com/~cyli
Harry Back
<whiskeya...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Where were you people when the penis bone expert was here? Rocket, you out
>there? I think you need to post that penis bone chart. And while extremely
>rare, some humans do have penis bones. Harry Back is a case in point...why
>do you think he's so popular with the ladies... ;)
You better believe it, baby!!
Art
>On 03 Sep 2001 07:10:27 GMT, beautif...@aol.com (BeautifulBrat4U) wrote:
>
>>>>There is more info on Karla & her pets if you want me to post more.
>>>
>>
>>All of this is false!! Karla & Paul were not into bestiality
>
>Oh were you there?
One need not have been there to realize the insipidity of the original
claim.
Paul was more likely to EAT the pets as he did with Karla's pet iguana
after he killed it and then forced her to cook it. What amazes me most is
how easily people believe such rubbish as the bestiality claim.
ART
Murray Anderson
"Art" <oh5...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:p356rtk7gtcadgbrh...@4ax.com...
It's generally known how much Karla loved her dog - it must have been the
only thing she loved for a couple years. The purpose of the bestiality claim
is to discredit that love.
By the way, welcome back, Art. Hope the newsgroup doesn't upset your health.
Murray Anderson
wmca...@earthlink.net
Thank Allah things are getting back to normal: bestiality, etc.
Whiskey Agogo
Murray Anderson wrote in message ...
>
>"Art" <oh5...@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
>news:p356rtk7gtcadgbrh...@4ax.com...
>> On Mon, 03 Sep 2001 07:28:59 GMT, Jung...@nextta.org wrote:
>>
>> >On 03 Sep 2001 07:10:27 GMT, beautif...@aol.com (BeautifulBrat4U)
>wrote:
>> >
>>
>> >>>>There is more info on Karla & her pets if you want me to post more.
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>All of this is false!! Karla & Paul were not into bestiality
>> >
>> >Oh were you there?
>>
>> One need not have been there to realize the insipidity of the original
>> claim.
>>
>> Paul was more likely to EAT the pets as he did with Karla's pet iguana
>> after he killed it and then forced her to cook it.
What amazes me most is
>> how easily people believe such rubbish as the bestiality claim.
No doubt. What kind of freaks would believe that a sweet wholesome girl
like karla would do something illegal and depraved like have sex with her
dog? Okay, so she drugged, raped and murdered a few teenagers, but nobody's
perfect.
>>
>> ART
>
>It's generally known how much Karla loved her dog -
I think paul captured this "love" on videotape.
it must have been the
>only thing she loved for a couple years. The purpose of the bestiality
claim
>is to discredit that love.
And to help explain why she and Buddy have conjugal visits and she still
sends him her used panties...
Harry Back
Anyone with any intelligence knows that whole thing about Karla
sending her dog her panties is an absurd rumour. But whatever floats
your boat...
Ambrose
control, a sense of degradation is a primary element driving pain=pleasure
patterns of behavior. Often manifesting as a game of daring one or the
other--ironically in many cases the actual controller is the submissive--to
go further and further into their greatest area of danger, which, also
ironically, produces the greatest sense of satisfaction for having submitted
to the internal personal conflict and fear, which then results in the
greatest sense of relief which the submissive identifies as pleasure and the
dominant believes is pleasure from having power--though illusiory--over the
submissive. In several of the more technicial texts on the subject of
variations within escalating dominance and submission fetish patterns,
bestiality can be just another in an often seemingless endless paraphiliac
responses. These outward manifestations of the s/m dynamic can be initiated
by either party, the covertly passive though outwardly dominant
partner--usually the more conservative sexual partner of the two--who in a
desparate attempt to achieve more control brings in an animal into the
sexual, or the challenging covertly agressive outwardly submissive partner,
who by submitting to sexual acts with the animal, is actually seeking to
threaten the power and control structure of the dominant partner by proving
that they, the outwardly submissive partener is in control because they have
the bravery to engage in the bestial act itself, thus proving that they are
the stronger. These roles often become wildly distorted, as the power
dynamic goes back and forth. No offence meant to those into s/m in its less
pernicious forms.
According to my connection in Canadian Law enforcement, there was at
least some evidence that the two were involved in bestiality though I
haven't heard how much of the currents stories are embelished. I don't mean
this as insulting but as an American I always find the Canadian legal system
strangely given to protecting "the public" from what someone up the line of
authority deems inapropriate for public discussion. Maybe Canadians just
have a better sense of decorum or a better sense of good taste. Uh, scratch
that last thought, I forgot that it was Canada who gave us Pam Anderson.
Hmmmm, you know, Karla looks a little like Pam.
Whatever.
Ambrose