>"Scout" <me4g...@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote in message
>news:jn3ut3$qv4$1@dont-email.me...

>> <d...@dudu.org> wrote in message
>> news:lrmap7dtroosdm65j7j48t0rm9mbo24nrm@4ax.com...
>>> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 09:28:41 -0400, Flint <age...@section31.org>
>>> wrote:

>>>>On 4/23/2012 3:31 AM, Nancy Luft wrote:
>>>>> On Apr 22, 9:00 pm, Flint<age...@section31.org>  wrote:
>>>>>> On 4/22/2012 6:40 PM, d...@dudu.org wrote:

>>>>>>> On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 15:21:15 -0700 (PDT), Nancy Luft
>>>>>>> <nanl...@yahoo.com>    wrote:

>>>>>>>> Greetings!

>>>>>>>> Here is a copy of my latest email to keep you all updated:

>>>>>>>> ### Zimmerman must be charged with PERJURY! ###

>>>>>>> And falisifying evidence and obstruction of justice.

>>>>>> You both are legal dipshits.  No trial has been held yet, nor has
>>>>>> Zimmerman offered testimony at one yet.  Therefore, hew can't have
>>>>>> possibly committed perjury... ainb't possible, no how, no way.

>>>>>> On top of it, the police and prosecutor already admitted they have no
>>>>>> evidence to refute Zim's claim of self defense.

>>>>>> Their case is DoA...

>>>>>> --
>>>>>> MFB

>>>>> Zimmerman did testify under oath last Friday at his bond hearing ...
>>>>> please read the news!

>>>>At a fucking bail hearing, Nancy drew...  His guilt has not been yet
>>>>been determined at trial.   What he said at the bail hearing has
>>>>absolutely no relevance to his guilt or innocence, most of which will
>>>>probably not even be admitted as evidence during the trial phase,
>>>>hence no 'perjury', Nancy Pigbitchslutfuckingcuntskankcumreceptacle.

>>> It's still testifying under oath, idiot.  And he perjured himself, as
>>> well as falsified evidence.

>> Yep, and while I see you making the accusation.... what I fail to see is
>> any evidence, much less proof, of the perjury you claim he committed.
>> Hell, you've already told us he's guilty of murder despite quite a bit of
>> evidence that suggests it could be self defense. One gets the idea you're
>> a bit prejudicial and thus your claims lack objectivity.

>The evidence is overwhelming for self defense.