Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Dawkins Leads EXODUS from Atheism
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Loirbaj
Feb 11, 2012, 5:10:13 AM2/11/12
to
So many Atheists it seems now are
vacating and coming to Him. Has
Dawkins 'set the pattern'? In a recent
and fatal NYTimes interview Dawkins
broke down after 2 hours and admitted
his personal belief in God.
It's highly plausible that in the universe there
are God-like creatures. - Richard Dawkins
vacating and coming to Him. Has
Dawkins 'set the pattern'? In a recent
and fatal NYTimes interview Dawkins
broke down after 2 hours and admitted
his personal belief in God.
It's highly plausible that in the universe there
are God-like creatures. - Richard Dawkins
Budikka666
Feb 11, 2012, 6:16:02 AM2/11/12
to
http://richarddawkins.net/articles/644915-archbishop-takes-on-atheist-dawkins
Dawkins - a staunch atheist despite the desperate LIES of creationists
to the contrary, will not only take on, but take down Britain's
leading man of a god.
Budikka
Dawkins - a staunch atheist despite the desperate LIES of creationists
to the contrary, will not only take on, but take down Britain's
leading man of a god.
Budikka
Free Lunch
Feb 11, 2012, 8:57:49 AM2/11/12
to
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:16:02 -0800 (PST), Budikka666
<budi...@netscape.net> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
I cannot imagine an Archbishop of Canterbury actually believing any of
the lies of creationists.
<budi...@netscape.net> wrote in alt.talk.creationism:
the lies of creationists.
George152
Feb 11, 2012, 3:29:12 PM2/11/12
to
Is the godbotherer going to apologise for taking the name of Brian in vain ?
Vurgil
Feb 11, 2012, 5:34:42 PM2/11/12
to
In article
<623880a7-652f-41f4...@hs8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
> his personal disbelief in God.
After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield. He
talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
silicon destiny. And heąs intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years into
the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into something
like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
[So the context of discussion is now established as being in Dyson's far
future, and the following must be interpreted in that context]
Doesnąt that description sound an awful lot like God?
[Again establishing that the context is Dyson's future universe]
łCertainly,˛ Professor Dawkins replies. łItąs highly plausible that in
the [Dyson future] universe there are God-like creatures.˛
He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks heąs gone around a
religious bend. łItąs very important to understand that these [future]
Gods came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
incremental evolution.˛
Could they be immortal?
The professor shrugs. łProbably not.˛ He smiles and adds, łBut I
wouldnąt want to be too dogmatic about that.˛
A version of this article appeared in print on September 20, 2011, in
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all
<623880a7-652f-41f4...@hs8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
Loirbaj <Rhod...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
> Dawkins 'set the pattern'? In a recent
> and fatal NYTimes interview Dawkins
> opened up after 2 hours and dispayed
> Dawkins 'set the pattern'? In a recent
> and fatal NYTimes interview Dawkins
> his personal disbelief in God.
After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield. He
talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a
silicon destiny. And heąs intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring
writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years into
the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into something
like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
[So the context of discussion is now established as being in Dyson's far
future, and the following must be interpreted in that context]
Doesnąt that description sound an awful lot like God?
[Again establishing that the context is Dyson's future universe]
łCertainly,˛ Professor Dawkins replies. łItąs highly plausible that in
the [Dyson future] universe there are God-like creatures.˛
He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks heąs gone around a
religious bend. łItąs very important to understand that these [future]
Gods came into being by an explicable scientific progression of
incremental evolution.˛
Could they be immortal?
The professor shrugs. łProbably not.˛ He smiles and adds, łBut I
wouldnąt want to be too dogmatic about that.˛
A version of this article appeared in print on September 20, 2011, in
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/science/20dawkins.html?pagewanted=all
Paul David Wright
Feb 12, 2012, 6:22:14 PM2/12/12
to
Loirbaj <Rhod...@wmconnect.com> wrote in
news:623880a7-652f-41f4...@hs8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com:
> So many Atheists it seems now are
> vacating and coming to Him.
More wishful thinking.
And that same out of context quote.
Don't you get tired of lying?
--
PDW
Check out my blog:
The first is a preview of my superhero comic book.
http://incognitoheroes.blogspot.com/
http://corneliusaddaptionproject.blogspot.com/
And my books:
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/pdwright42
news:623880a7-652f-41f4...@hs8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com:
> So many Atheists it seems now are
> vacating and coming to Him.
And that same out of context quote.
Don't you get tired of lying?
--
PDW
Check out my blog:
The first is a preview of my superhero comic book.
http://incognitoheroes.blogspot.com/
http://corneliusaddaptionproject.blogspot.com/
And my books:
http://www.lulu.com/spotlight/pdwright42
Paul David Wright
Feb 12, 2012, 6:23:56 PM2/12/12
to
George152 <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote in
news:0_udnagy2MQGUqvS...@giganews.com:
Not likely.
Being a fundimentalist means never having to apologise.
Ever.
news:0_udnagy2MQGUqvS...@giganews.com:
Being a fundimentalist means never having to apologise.
Ever.
0 new messages