Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Who knows Ted Frank?

0 views
Skip to first unread message

John W. Redelfs

unread,
May 17, 1993, 10:45:11 PM5/17/93
to

In THE SHADOWS OF POWER by James Perloff there is an appendix showing the
membership roster of the Council on Foreign Relations as of June 30, 1988.
Listed among the members is Charles R. Frank, Jr., Richard A. Frank, and
Isaiah Frank.

Does anyone know if Ted Frank is related to any of these men? If he is,
that would explain a lot about his world view and unreasoned allegiance to
statist and globalist objectives.

We could hardly expect Mr. Ted Frank to eschew family money, power and
position.

How about it Ted? Are you kin to any of these big shots?
--
------------ John W. Redelfs, cj...@cleveland.freenet.edu -------------
--------- All my opinions are tentative pending further data. ---------

Ted Frank

unread,
May 17, 1993, 11:51:16 PM5/17/93
to
In article <1t9ijn$4...@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> cj...@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John W. Redelfs) writes:
>In THE SHADOWS OF POWER by James Perloff there is an appendix showing the
>membership roster of the Council on Foreign Relations as of June 30, 1988.
>Listed among the members is Charles R. Frank, Jr., Richard A. Frank, and
>Isaiah Frank.
>
>Does anyone know if Ted Frank is related to any of these men? If he is,
>that would explain a lot about his world view and unreasoned allegiance to
>statist and globalist objectives.
>
>We could hardly expect Mr. Ted Frank to eschew family money, power and
>position.
>
>How about it Ted? Are you kin to any of these big shots?

No. There are five living Franks in my family, to my knowledge. The rest
are Rutas and Millers and Hurwitzs and Gordons and the occasional
Frankenthaler who didn't change his or her name coming over from Germany.

Frank is not an uncommon name. There were three in my Commercial Law class
last fall alone, none of them related.

Were there any Crockers? Is Steve any relation to Betty? Are you any
relation to the Keebler Redelf?
--
ted frank | "Cranberry sauce."
th...@kimbark.uchicago.edu | -- John Lennon,
the u of c law school | "Strawberry Fields Forever"
standard disclaimers |

Steve Crocker

unread,
May 18, 1993, 2:30:48 AM5/18/93
to

As Ted may or may not be aware, Betty Crocker is fictitious. It would
be more interesting to ask if I was related to Charles Crocker of the
Transcontinental Railroad, Chester Crocker, formerly of the State
Department, or the California banking Crockers. As far as I know, none
of these are my relatives. My great-grandfather and his son emigrated
from England's coal mining region, and as far as I know, in this country
were copper miners and farmers.

-Steve

Paolucci Paul

unread,
May 18, 1993, 2:15:22 AM5/18/93
to
In article <1t9ijn$4...@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> cj...@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John W. Redelfs) writes:
>In THE SHADOWS OF POWER by James Perloff there is an appendix showing the
>membership roster of the Council on Foreign Relations as of June 30, 1988.
>Listed among the members is Charles R. Frank, Jr., Richard A. Frank, and
>Isaiah Frank.
>Does anyone know if Ted Frank is related to any of these men? If he is,
>that would explain a lot about his world view and unreasoned allegiance to
>statist and globalist objectives.
>We could hardly expect Mr. Ted Frank to eschew family money, power and
>position.
>How about it Ted? Are you kin to any of these big shots?

I seem to remember several people also accusing him of being a
New World Order supporter and him never addressing or denying it. This
would all be true to form if the above were true. Would be anyway...


Tim Smith

unread,
May 18, 1993, 4:09:44 AM5/18/93
to
paol...@spot.Colorado.EDU (Paolucci Paul) writes:
> I seem to remember several people also accusing him of being a
>New World Order supporter and him never addressing or denying it. This

Was that a serious accusation? I thought someone was trying to assassinate
Ted by making him laugh to death. They nearly got a lot of the rest of
us, too...

--Tim Smith

William VanHorne

unread,
May 18, 1993, 7:34:03 AM5/18/93
to
In article <1993May18....@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> paol...@spot.Colorado.EDU (Paolucci Paul) writes:

> I seem to remember several people also accusing him of being a
>New World Order supporter and him never addressing or denying it. This
>would all be true to form if the above were true. Would be anyway...

Alright, I can't stand it anymore! What the hell is the New World Order?

---Bill VanHorne

Lance W. Bledsoe

unread,
May 18, 1993, 11:07:08 AM5/18/93
to
In article <1tahjb$6...@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> wvh...@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (William VanHorne) writes:
>
>Alright, I can't stand it anymore! What the hell is the New World Order?

Ask Ted, I think he's in charge. :-)

Well actually, I've got this book...

Lance


--
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Lance W. Bledsoe l...@im4u.cs.utexas.edu (512) 258-0112 |
| "Ye shall know the TRUTH, and the TRUTH shall make you free." |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+

norman miller

unread,
May 18, 1993, 1:27:05 PM5/18/93
to
In article <1993May18....@midway.uchicago.edu> th...@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>
>No. There are five living Franks in my family, to my knowledge. The rest
>are Rutas and Millers and Hurwitzs and Gordons and the occasional
>Frankenthaler who didn't change his or her name coming over from Germany.
>

A wise and calm answer from Ted Frank. Not one that I
would have given in similar circumstances. We seem to
be heading for the silly (or dirty) season kind of
early this year.

nm

Ted Frank

unread,
May 18, 1993, 2:06:14 PM5/18/93
to
In article <1t9vqo$q...@news.ysu.edu> ad...@yfn.ysu.edu (Steve Crocker) writes:
>
>As Ted may or may not be aware, Betty Crocker is fictitious.

That's just what *they* want you to think. It's fairly clear that
Betty Crocker is in cahoots with Lyndon Larouche, and Steve is just
trying to cover it up. That there's no evidence for this claim whatsoever
just shows how devious these folks are.

bpha...@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu

unread,
May 19, 1993, 2:06:03 AM5/19/93
to
> In article <1993May18....@ucsu.Colorado.EDU> paol...@spot.Colorado.EDU (Paolucci Paul) writes:
>
>> I seem to remember several people also accusing him of being a
>>New World Order supporter and him never addressing or denying it. This
>>would all be true to form if the above were true. Would be anyway...
>
Now everybody, what is it that ticks you off about Ted Frank? Is it
that he doesn't think like you do? That he *disagrees* with you?
He has the right to make his own decisions fellas. Even if that might
mean he's a, *gasp*, New World Order supporter!
And what's this crap about keeping a Ted Frank archive? Merely so you
can blackball him?

=======================================================================
"To be born to create, to love, to win at games is to be born to live
in time of peace. But war teaches us to lose everything and become
what we were not. It all becomes a question of style....." -A. Camus
||||||||Brian Harmon, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056 |||||||||||
-----------...@miavx1.acs.muohio.edu--------------------------

Mark Eckenwiler

unread,
May 19, 1993, 9:14:14 AM5/19/93
to
In <1993May18....@midway.uchicago.edu>, th...@midway.uchicago.edu sez:
>In article <1t9ijn$4...@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> cj...@cleveland.Freenet.Edu (John W. Redelfs) writes:
>>In THE SHADOWS OF POWER by James Perloff there is an appendix showing the
>>membership roster of the Council on Foreign Relations as of June 30, 1988.
>>Listed among the members is Charles R. Frank, Jr., Richard A. Frank, and
>>Isaiah Frank.
>>
>>Does anyone know if Ted Frank is related to any of these men? If he is,
>>that would explain a lot about his world view and unreasoned allegiance to
>>statist and globalist objectives.
>>How about it Ted? Are you kin to any of these big shots?

>Were there any Crockers? Is Steve any relation to Betty? Are you any


>relation to the Keebler Redelf?

NONONONO Ted,

dOn 't you
know tHat
all

the elVe$ we're PURGED in the 1950S ??????????

ThINk Back/kcaB to that DISCUSion
between Jos. Welch (NOTE INTIALS "J-W") and Roy ""COH[e]N"" about

ElVeS & piXiEs

durring the ARMY-MACCARTHY HERRINGS?!


{<I heaR JOHN has a COUSIN named "DOPey" tho.>}
--

UNAUTHORIZED INSEMINATION of this ARTICLE is ENCOURAGED

Drew Lawson

unread,
May 19, 1993, 12:01:16 PM5/19/93
to
In article <1993May18.1...@midway.uchicago.edu> th...@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>In article <1t9vqo$q...@news.ysu.edu> ad...@yfn.ysu.edu (Steve Crocker) writes:
>>
>>As Ted may or may not be aware, Betty Crocker is fictitious.
>
>That's just what *they* want you to think. It's fairly clear that
>Betty Crocker is in cahoots with Lyndon Larouche, and Steve is just
>trying to cover it up.


I thought that Betty Crocker was in cahoots with the Pillsbury Dough Boy.

I have it on good authority that Betty has "something in the oven."


Drew "gives a whole new meaning to poppin' fresh" Lawson
--
+--------------------+-------------------------------------------+
| Drew Lawson | I had to sell my internal organs |
| law...@acuson.com | Just to pay the rent. |
| | -- Weird Al (When I was Your Age) |

Roy Crabtree

unread,
May 20, 1993, 2:29:16 AM5/20/93
to
>In article <1t9vqo$q...@news.ysu.edu> ad...@yfn.ysu.edu (Steve Crocker) writes:
>>
>>As Ted may or may not be aware, Betty Crocker is fictitious.
>
>That's just what *they* want you to think. It's fairly clear that
>Betty Crocker is in cahoots with Lyndon Larouche, and Steve is just
>trying to cover it up. That there's no evidence for this claim whatsoever
>just shows how devious these folks are.

Easy, folks, lets not that Frankish powered engine revved up;
he's talking to himself again ...
royc

Roy Crabtree

unread,
May 20, 1993, 2:30:33 AM5/20/93
to
In article <1993May19.1...@acuson.com> law...@acuson.com (Drew Lawson) writes:
>In article <1993May18.1...@midway.uchicago.edu> th...@midway.uchicago.edu writes:
>>In article <1t9vqo$q...@news.ysu.edu> ad...@yfn.ysu.edu (Steve Crocker) writes:
>>>
>>>As Ted may or may not be aware, Betty Crocker is fictitious.
>>
>>That's just what *they* want you to think. It's fairly clear that
>>Betty Crocker is in cahoots with Lyndon Larouche, and Steve is just
>>trying to cover it up.
>
>
>I thought that Betty Crocker was in cahoots with the Pillsbury Dough Boy.

HERE IS WHERE THE MONEY WENT

LOTSA DOUGH


>
>I have it on good authority that Betty has "something in the oven."

Oh, yeah: something must be cookin' up ther!

royc

Lance W. Bledsoe

unread,
May 20, 1993, 1:22:04 PM5/20/93
to
>In article <1993May19.1...@acuson.com> law...@acuson.com (Drew Lawson) writes:
>>
>>I thought that Betty Crocker was in cahoots with the Pillsbury Dough Boy.

Last I heard Mr. Pop N. Fresh was getting his buns rubbed by Betty Crocker.
I'ts rumored that she even gave him a dough job! She even took him out,
filled him full of yeast, and waited for his biscuit to start rising.
This is probablly just a rumor, because the real scoop on Mr. Fresh is
that he likes to get together with Little Oscar and play "pigs in a blanket".

:-)

John W. Redelfs

unread,
May 27, 1993, 2:40:03 PM5/27/93
to

Hey Normy,

I have a Second Great Grandfather named Miller. Maybe we're cousins.
<grin>

Just kidding.

0 new messages