Re: Weinergate Development Takes a Back Seat to Palin Emails
John Smith
> ...
> Vitter? It was a commercial transaction between an adult male and an adult
> female. Personally I don't think prostitution should be illegal.
>
> Foley? How about Studds, you crawling bucket of shit. He actually fucked a
> 17 yo male page. And got a standing ovation from his fellow deviants when
> he returned to the House.
>
Into this dark, evil and dangerous world, we need some public servants
to bring us light and help lead us out of our problems and darkness ...
a few hundred of them, burning at the stake, would serve quite nicely! :-)
--
Regards,
JS
“The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain
the people, it’s an instrument for the people to restrain the
government.” -- Patrick Henry
JohnJohnsn
"Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles <Yoor...@Jurgis.net>, a/k/a
<rose...@enetis.net> and <rose...@idt.net>, Left-Wing Lying Liberal
Socialist LOSER Democrat™ (est. 2010-11-02) Gun Control Advocate,
wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:16:03 -0700, John Smith <bit_buc...@gmx.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 6/11/2011 4:12 PM, Gray Ghost wrote:
>>> ...
>>> Vitter? It was a commercial transaction between an adult male and an adult
>>> female. Personally I don't think prostitution should be illegal.
>
>>> Foley? How about Studds, you crawling bucket of shit. He actually fucked
>>> a 17 yo male page. And got a standing ovation from his fellow deviants when
>>> he returned to the House.
>
>> Into this dark, evil and dangerous world, we need some public servants
>> to bring us light and help lead us out of our problems and darkness ...
>
> Like Reagan?
Third Law of Leftist Debate:
The more you present a leftist with factual evidence that is counter
to his preconceived world view and the more difficult it becomes for
him to refute it without losing face the chance of him changing his
criteria (goal post move) approaches infinity.
> He committed perjury in the Pointdexter deposition
Prove it, Gary!
Perjury
Perjury is lying under oath, usually in a court of law, but also under
certain other specific circumstances, such as testifying before
Congress (in the U.S.).
The favorite way to avoid perjury in modern times, perfected by Ronald
Reagan under the sad influences of "plausible deniability" and
Alzheimer's Disease, is to claim to "have no memory".
-http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Perjury
List of American federal politicians convicted of crimes
1981–1988 (Reagan (R) presidency)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_federal_politicians_convicted_of_crimes#1981.E2.80.931988_.28Reagan_.28R.29_presidency.29
Well, Gary; Ronald Wilson Reagan isn't on that list.
However, there are quite a few "Ds" on that list. <snicker>
Mario Biaggi (D-New York) sentenced to 2½ years.
Robert Garcia (D-New York) sentenced to 2½ years.
Harrison A. Williams Senator (D-New Jersey) Convicted on 9 counts of
bribery and conspiracy. Sentenced to 3 years in prison.
John Jenrette Representative (D-South Carolina) sentenced to two years
in prison for bribery and conspiracy.
Raymond Lederer (D-Pennsylvania) "I can give you me" he said after
accepting $50K. Sentenced to 3 years.
Michael Myers (D-Pennsylvania) Accepted $50K saying, "...money talks
and bullshit walks." Sentenced to 3 years and was expelled from the
House.
Frank Thompson (D-New Jersey) Sentenced to 3 years.
John M. Murphy (D-New York) Served 20 months of a 3-year sentence.
Mario Biaggi (D-New York), Convicted of obstruction of justice and
accepting illegal gratuities he was sentenced to 2½ years in prison
and fined $500K for his role in the Wedtech scandal, see above. Just
before expulsion from the House, he resigned. The next year he was
convicted of another 15 counts of obstruction and bribery. (1988)
James Traficant (D-Ohio), convicted of ten felony counts including
bribery, racketeering and tax evasion and sentenced to 8 years in
prison. He was expelled from the House July 24, (2002)
Frederick W. Richmond (D-New York),Convicted of tax evasion and
possession of marijuana. Served 9 months (1982)
Dan Flood (D-Pennsylvania) censured for bribery. After a trial ended
in a deadlocked jury, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to a year's
probation.
Joshua Eilberg (D-Pennsylvania) pleaded guilty to conflict-of-interest
charges. In addition, he convinced president Carter to fire the U.S.
Attorney investigating his case.
Alcee Hastings (D-Florida), Federal District court judge impeached by
the House and convicted by the Senate of soliciting a bribe (1989).
Subsequently elected to the U.S. House of Representatives (1992)
Harry Claiborne (D-Nebraska), Federal District court Judge impeached
by the House and convicted by the Senate on two counts of tax evasion.
He served over one year in prison.
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant;
it's just that they know so much that isn't so."
— Ronald Wilson Reagan
Firebottle3
> On Jun 11, 6:43 pm, 69-year-old Vapid City, South Dakotan Gary Richard
> <rosel...@enetis.net> and <rosel...@idt.net>, Left-Wing Lying Liberal
Ronny Raygun, the idiot that started us down the path of large
deficits. Only to be continued by Big Bush and little bush.
Raygunomics never worked and never will.
My name is John Johnson
I come from Wisconsin
I make three dollars a day
I go to see Nelly
And, lay on her belly
She takes my three dollars a day.
Firebottle3
Correction.............................^^^^
JohnJohnsn
"The U.S. economy experienced substantial turbulence during the Reagan
years despite favorable general economic conditions. This was the
"creative destruction" that is characteristic of a healthy economy. At
the end of the Reagan administration, the U.S. economy had experienced
the longest peacetime expansion ever. The "stagflation" and "malaise"
that plagued the U.S. economy from 1973 through 1980 were transformed
by the Reagan economic program into a sustained period of higher
growth and lower inflation."
-William A. Niskanen, chairman of the Cato Institute
AuthorL "Reaganomics"
> My name is John Johnson
> I come from Wisconsin
> I make three dollars a day
> I go to see Nelly
> And, lay on her belly
> She takes my three dollars a day
Is that your way of admittting to purchasing sex from cheap whores,
Johnnie? <snicker>
"Confronting Liberals with the facts of reality is very much akin
to clubbing baby seals. It gets boring after a while, but because
Liberals are so stupid it is easy work."
— Steven M. Barry
RHF
Oops... Sarah Palin's eMails Prove Boring
-as-sarah-herself-is-boring-boring-boring-
-yawn-yawn-yawn-yawn-yawn-yawn-yawn-
.
-w-h-i-l-e-
.
Weiner is The Gift That Keeps On Giving ! ! !
-weiner-gate-=s-weiner-you-sick-stupid-dog-
.
WeinerGate© Is Liberal Immorality
Now Weiner is Linked-to Sexting a Teenagers
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexting
-the-naked-truth-about-weiner-gate-
.
WeinerGate© Is Democrat Debauchery
Weiner is Linked-to More and More Sexting
-weiner-gate-exposes-liberalism-as-a-sickness-
.
Weiner Wants Time-Off For Bad Behavior
-resign-now-weiner- -weiner-resign-now-
.
Weiner Want's The US Tax-Payers To Pay-the-Bill
For His Re-Hab -nah-resign-now-weiner-!-
.
.
Barack Obama [D-USA is Tainted by WeinerGate©
The Obama-Regime is Contaminated by Weiner
-going-into-2012-
.
Nancy Pelosi [D-CA] Stinks of WeinerGate©
-hence- All Democrat Reps are Now Weiners !
-going-into-2012-
.
Harry Reid [D-NV has the Stench of WeinerGate©
-hence- All Democrat Senators are Now Weiners !
-going-into-2012-
.
The Taint, Stink and Stench of WeinerGate©
Pollutes All Democrats As Weiners for 2012
.
Having Weiner "In-Office" : Will Cost The Democrats
17 to 25 Seats in the 2012 Election
--cause-it's-weiner-gate-24/7-weiner-gate-weiner-gate-
.
Again Sarah Palin's eMails Prove She Is Boring
-boring-boring-boring-boring-boring-boring-boring-
.
.
Gray Ghost
news:o9v7v6l5mqojtqnna...@4ax.com:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:16:03 -0700, John Smith <bit_b...@gmx.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On 6/11/2011 4:12 PM, Gray Ghost wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>>> Vitter? It was a commercial transaction between an adult male and an
>>> adult female. Personally I don't think prostitution should be illegal.
>>>
>>> Foley? How about Studds, you crawling bucket of shit. He actually
>>> fucked a 17 yo male page. And got a standing ovation from his fellow
>>> deviants when he returned to the House.
>>>
>>
>>Into this dark, evil and dangerous world, we need some public servants
>>to bring us light and help lead us out of our problems and darkness ...
>
> Like Reagan?
>
> He committed perjury in the Pointdexter deposition
Apparently only in the twisted minds of the Kangaroo Court of Leftist
shitbags. He was never charged. Are you suggesting that the then Democrat
Congress couldn't get it's collectives dicks out of the asses of 17 yo male
pages long enough to charge and impeach him?
> What fucking conservative could POSSIBLY "enlighten" the political
> scene?
Any one at random.
> Based on the long litany of moral lapses and stupidity of some of your
> most revered idols.
Like Bill clinton, Charlie Rangel, Gerry Studds, Jim Wright, Eliot Spitzer,
James McGreevey, Mel Reynolds, Gary Hart, Wayne Hays, et al?
I realise that in your incredibly simple world Democrat are God like in
thier purity and Republicans Satan like in thier evil but the world does
not function as the distorted, drug addled cartoon that you think it is.
--
Herman Cain for President! http://hermancain.com/
If you don't support him you are a Racist!!
He beat Cancer. He'll beat Obama (who is just like cancer)
Remember Desert One, Carter 0? Ain't it sad to wish that Obama had as much
ambition but being glad he doesn't knowing he doesn't have THAT much
competence?
Gray Ghost
0e05bf...@p20g2000yqg.googlegroups.com:
Hmm, personal attacks. Well, when you have nothing else and you're not all
that bright...
I have a scruffy little mutt that is smarter than you. And he ain't that
bright.
Gray Ghost
c94ebd...@d1g2000yqk.googlegroups.com:
And let us not forget the destruction without a general war of an
intractable enemy of 45 years.
>> My name is John Johnson
>> I come from Wisconsin
>> I make three dollars a day
>> I go to see Nelly
>> And, lay on her belly
>> She takes my three dollars a day
>
> Is that your way of admittting to purchasing sex from cheap whores,
> Johnnie? <snicker>
He's acknoledging his parentage.
> "Confronting Liberals with the facts of reality is very much akin
> to clubbing baby seals. It gets boring after a while, but because
> Liberals are so stupid it is easy work."
> — Steven M. Barry
>
> "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant;
> it's just that they know so much that isn't so."
> — Ronald Wilson Reagan
>
--
Gray Ghost
4a6206...@f2g2000yqh.googlegroups.com:
> On Jun 11, 7:29 pm, Firebottle3 <firebott...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jun 11, 7:22 pm, JohnJohnsn <TopCop1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Correction.............................^^^^
>
You certainly need one.
BTW you have been nominated for the dumb shit of the week award. Rest easy, i
expect you are a sure thing.
Gray Ghost
> On 6/11/2011 4:12 PM, Gray Ghost wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Vitter? It was a commercial transaction between an adult male and an
adult
>> female. Personally I don't think prostitution should be illegal.
>>
>> Foley? How about Studds, you crawling bucket of shit. He actually fucked
a
>> 17 yo male page. And got a standing ovation from his fellow deviants
when
>> he returned to the House.
>>
>
> Into this dark, evil and dangerous world, we need some public servants
> to bring us light and help lead us out of our problems and darkness ...
>
> a few hundred of them, burning at the stake, would serve quite nicely!
:-)
>
Well said, john. A blossom of intelligence from an otherwise barren plant.
JohnJohnsn
Richard "Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles <Yoorg...@Jurgis.net>, a/k/a
Socialist LOSER Democrat (est. 2010-11-02) Gun Control Advocate,
wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 17:22:12 -0700 (PDT), JohnJohnsn
> <TopCop1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> He committed perjury in the Pointdexter deposition
>
>> Prove it, Gary!
>
>> Perjury
>
>> Perjury is lying under oath, usually in a court of law, but also under
>> certain other specific circumstances, such as testifying before
>> Congress (in the U.S.).
>
> Reagan specifically went on TV (oval office) and did a "mea culpa" and
> admitted he lied about his awarness and involvement in the arms for
> hostages and gunrunning in South America.
>
> He wasn't prosecuted---because the impeachment clause (applied
> correctly) demands a threat to the nation. The criminal aspect of any
> crime of a president, (absent compelling evidence to be "clear and
> present danger") would be adjudicated AFTER his term in office.
>
> Reagan DID commit perjury, he admitted he did, and his Cabinent and
> advisors all confirmed he did.
Your unsupported assertion dies not constitute proof, Gary.
Come back when you can provide _proof_ of those assertions.
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant;
it's just that they know so much that isn't so."
— Ronald Wilson Reagan
"History is indeed the witness of the times, the light of truth."
--Cicero
John Smith
> ...
> "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant;
> it's just that they know so much that isn't so."
> — Ronald Wilson Reagan
> ...
Just goes to show you how right Barnum had it (even though it is
disputed he said it), out of the mouth of morons, huh?
John Smith
> ...
> "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant;
> it's just that they know so much that isn't so."
> — Ronald Wilson Reagan
>
> "History is indeed the witness of the times, the light of truth."
> --Cicero
Just goes to show you how right Barnum had it (even though it is
disputed he said it), out of the mouth of morons, huh?
Just goes to show you, the most dangerous man in the world can be a
moron who has found something to believe in.
Or, an alzheimers ridden imbecile who is being used by banksters and
wall street ...
JohnJohnsn
Richard "Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles <Yoorg...@Jurgis.net>, a/k/a
<rosel...@enetis.net> and <rosel...@idt.net>, Left-Wing Lying Liberal
Socialist LOSER Democrat (est. 2010-11-02) Gun Control Advocate,
wrote:
>
> <grey_ghost471-newsgro...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>> Into this dark, evil and dangerous world, we need some public servants
>>>> to bring us light and help lead us out of our problems and darkness ...
>
>>> Like Reagan?
>
>>> He committed perjury in the Pointdexter deposition
>
>> Apparently only in the twisted minds of the Kangaroo Court of Leftist
>> shitbags. He was never charged. Are you suggesting that the then Democrat
>> Congress couldn't get it's collectives dicks out of the asses of 17 yo male
>> pages long enough to charge and impeach him?
>
> is to "Protect" the nation, not to "get" a political enemy. (like
> republicans did against clinton)
>
> b) He wasn't charged (impeached) because it would have made more of a
> mess of the nation than the republicans had been doing. He was found
> out, he went on TV and admitted he lied, and democrats did not demand
> indictment because he was nothing but on old fool
PERJURY
When a person, having taken an oath before a competent tribunal,
officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the U.S. authorizes
an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or
certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition,
or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to
such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not
believe to be true; or in any declaration, certificate, verification,
or statement under penalty of perjury, willfully subscribes as true
any material matter which he does not believe to be true; 18 USC
In order for a person to be found guilty of perjury the government
must prove: the person testified under oath before [e.g., the grand
jury]; at least one particular statement was false; and the person
knew at the time the testimony was false.
The testimony of one witness is not enough to support a finding that
the testimony was false. There must be additional evidence, either the
testimony of another person or other evidence, which tends to support
the testimony of falsity. The other evidence, standing alone, need not
convince that the testimony was false, but all the evidence on the
subject must do so.
-http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/p032.htm
OK, Gary; using the above LEGAL definition of "perjury," prove that
Ronaldus Maximus commotted perjury.
Making an assertion is easy for you, Gary; let's see if you are
capable of assembling a criminal case to support that assertion.
Remember, Gary: in order to obtain a conviction you must prove your
case "beyond all reasonable doubt."
"Well; we're WAITING!" -Judge Elihu Smails
John Smith
>> ...
ROFLOL!
As if that brain dead fool knew anything, he could barely still act as
he attempted to play the part of a president -- only the children and
fools found the performance acceptable ...
raygun was the perfect puppet for the puppet masters, now they are
forced into using negro slaves and plotting to use palin soccer moms!
JohnJohnsn
> On 6/12/2011 6:38 AM, JohnJohnsn wrote:
>
> >> ...
>
> ROFLOL!
Since you snipped everything I posted, no one can tell what you find
so amusing, Smitty.
> As if that brain dead fool knew anything, he could barely still act as
> he attempted to play the part of a president -- only the children and
> fools found the performance acceptable ...
>
> raygun was the perfect puppet for the puppet masters, now they are
> forced into using negro slaves and plotting to use palin soccer moms!
Americans rate Reagan best U.S. president
By James Hohmann
2/18/11 4:08 PM EST
Updated: 2/18/11 4:56 PM EST
Gallup, in a poll released Friday, asked 1,015 adults to name the
president they regard as the greatest in history.
Ronald Reagan finished first at 19 percent, followed by Abraham
Lincoln at 14 percent and Bill Clinton at 13 percent.
-http://images.politico.com/global/news/110208_reagan_sunshine_605.jpg
...
One of three presidents — Lincoln, Reagan or Kennedy — has been on top
the past 12 years.
...
The poll was conducted from Feb. 2-5. The margin of error was plus or
minus 4 percent.
...
-http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49836.html
John Smith
> On Jun 12, 8:41 am, John Smith<bit_buc...@gmx.com> wrote:
>
>> On 6/12/2011 6:38 AM, JohnJohnsn wrote:
>>
>> >> ...
>>
>> ROFLOL!
>
> Since you snipped everything I posted, no one can tell what you find
> so amusing, Smitty.
>
Use a threaded usenet client, will save you from looking like a moron ...
>> As if that brain dead fool knew anything, he could barely still act as
>> he attempted to play the part of a president -- only the children and
>> fools found the performance acceptable ...
>>
>> raygun was the perfect puppet for the puppet masters, now they are
>> forced into using negro slaves and plotting to use palin soccer moms!
>
> Americans rate Reagan best U.S. president
> By James Hohmann
> 2/18/11 4:08 PM EST
> Updated: 2/18/11 4:56 PM EST
>
> Gallup, in a poll released Friday, asked 1,015 adults to name the
> president they regard as the greatest in history.
>
> Ronald Reagan finished first at 19 percent, followed by Abraham
> Lincoln at 14 percent and Bill Clinton at 13 percent.
>
> -http://images.politico.com/global/news/110208_reagan_sunshine_605.jpg
> ...
> One of three presidents — Lincoln, Reagan or Kennedy — has been on top
> the past 12 years.
> ...
> The poll was conducted from Feb. 2-5. The margin of error was plus or
> minus 4 percent.
> ...
> -http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49836.html
>
> "History is indeed the witness of the times, the light of truth."
> --Cicero
Yeah, I don't believe a word of it, only morons would not recognize that
raygun was/is the beginning of everything you now see happening, it was
he who tore off all the controls, and in his words, "time to turn the
bull loose."
Well, now that the bull has destroyed good jobs, decent wages,
sufficient retirement, medical, etc. see how you like your new digs!
Maybe it is thing with morons, they will live in a dump and count their
blessings ...
Joe from Kokomo
You're sure doing a lot of whining about Weiner.
How odd that I don't remember you saying anything at all against David
Vitter (R)-Louisiana who committed an arguably worse crime than Weiner.
Any reason you had no comment on Vitter? Blind partisanship? Selective
memory? Hypocrisy?
You must be taking your cue from Eric Cantor (R)-Virginia who said:
a) "We should pray for Mr. Vitter's family".
b) "Weiner should resign".
You presumably have some intelligence, so don't you detect just the
slightest bit of hypocrisy here?
Ol' Joe from Kokomo says Weiner should resign...right *after* Vitter
does. What could be more fair than that, hmmmm?
JohnJohnsn
"Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles <Yoorg...@Jurgis.net>, a/k/a
<rosel...@enetis.net> and <rosel...@idt.net>, Left-Wing Lying Liberal
Socialist LOSER Democrat (est. 2010-11-02) Gun Control Advocate,
wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:18:04 -0700 (PDT), JohnJohnsn
> <TopCop1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>> Reagan DID commit perjury, he admitted he did, and his Cabinen
>>>t and advisors all confirmed he did.
>
>>Your unsupported assertion dies not constitute proof, Gary.
>
> The public record is the proof, you dumb asshole
Just more unsupported assertion from the Yoorghis IDIOT.
If it's "public record" post it; don't just _claim_ it occurred, Gary.
> Are you now saying that Reagan did not go on TV and admit lying?
I am saying that you have yet to post proof that such a thing
occurred.
Your claiming it doesn't constitute proof in the real world; a place
where you Left-Wing Lying Liberal Socialist LOSER Democrast (est.
2010-11-02) don't want to live, Gary.
JohnJohnsn
Richard "Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles <Yoorg...@Jurgis.net>, a/k/a
<rosel...@enetis.net> and <rosel...@idt.net>, Left-Wing Lying Liberal
Socialist LOSER Democrat (est. 2010-11-02) Gun Control Advocate,
wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 17:22:12 -0700 (PDT), JohnJohnsn
> <TopCop1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant;
>> it's just that they know so much that isn't so."
>>— Ronald Wilson Reagan
>
> That was as he was covertly subverting government by selling arms
> to Iran and funneling the money to the Contras.
>
> He ran the "most criminal administration in history" in terms of rank
> and number of appointed cabinet officers and appointees.
-http://tinyurl.com/Irony-Meter-Pegged
You Left-Wing Lying Liberal Socialist LOSER Democrats (est.
2010-11-02) have a problem deciding which Republican administration
is the "most criminal administration in history", Gary:
Thou Shalt Not Accuse!
...
"...the most criminal administration in history..."
...
"WHY AMERICANS REFUSE TO BELIEVE THE 9/11 EVIDENCE!!! - The attacks of
9/11 were so unthinkable that most Americans would refuse to believe
the complicity of their own government, even if presented with a
mountain of evidence. - Very simply, it is possible to escape blame if
you do something that nobody in the world believes you could do."
...
-http://www.tvnewslies.org/html/thou_shalt_not_accuse_.html
Yea, Gary; you're in "good company" with the "9-11 Truthers."
<snicker>
"I'm all in favor of keeping dangerous weapons out
of the hands of fools. Let's start with typewriters."
--Frank Lloyd Wright (1868-1959)
"Confronting Liberals with the facts of reality is very much akin
to clubbing baby seals. It gets boring after a while, but because
Liberals are so stupid it is easy work."
-- Steven M. Barry
John Smith
Oh my, a budding new wannabe' spin doctor! Of course, we won't be
seeing any lab analysis, experts, engineers, architects, scientists,
building demolition technicians, etc. ... just smoke and mirrors ...
Gray Ghost
news:cig8v61srbk822irk...@4ax.com:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 22:47:13 -0500, Gray Ghost
><grey_ghost47...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>>>
>>>>Into this dark, evil and dangerous world, we need some public servants
>>>>to bring us light and help lead us out of our problems and darkness
>>>>...
>>>
>>> Like Reagan?
>>>
>>> He committed perjury in the Pointdexter deposition
>>
>>Apparently only in the twisted minds of the Kangaroo Court of Leftist
>>shitbags. He was never charged. Are you suggesting that the then
>>Democrat Congress couldn't get it's collectives dicks out of the asses
>>of 17 yo male pages long enough to charge and impeach him?
>
> a) It's true he wasn't charged. The intent of the impeachment clause
> is to "Protect" the nation, not to "get" a political enemy. (like
> republicans did against clinton)
>
> b) He wasn't charged (impeached) because it would have made more of a
> mess of the nation than the republicans had been doing. He was found
> out, he went on TV and admitted he lied, and democrats did not demand
> indictment because he was nothing but on old fool
You lameasses are nothing but one big, fucking, whining excuse, 24/7/365.
The world is not as you perceive it. If it was, it would not exist for all
the contradictions.
Didn't stop you from demanding Bush be impeached from the day he took
office.
Gray Ghost
8c5196...@z37g2000yqb.googlegroups.com:
Which is why JS lasted about a week before he went in the bozo bin. He's
just another asshole searching for some TP.
John Smith
> ...
> You lameasses are nothing but one big, fucking, whining excuse, 24/7/365.
>
> The world is not as you perceive it. If it was, it would not exist for all
> the contradictions.
>
> Didn't stop you from demanding Bush be impeached from the day he took
> office.
>
Well, we have his rant on that. Good thing that there are facts and
proofs in boundless supply and this idiot isn't important ...
Gray Ghost
I dunno, do you really think a commercial transaction between an adult male
and an adult female is worse than sending pictures of your junk to
anonymous women on the internet and putting yourself in a position to be
blackmailed and oh BTW one of his cuties, at least one of which was 17 yo
making him a sexual predator?
For the record, I hope the arrogant bastard doesn't resign. Of course if
the morons in his district reelect him, he's still good for 5 to 10 seats
overall on the digust issue. Hell, he may even end up in Fort Marcy Park.
John Smith
> ...
> I dunno,...
Yeah, that was quite apparent when you first started your rants.
Let us know when you have some thing other than your rants ...
John Smith
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 07:53:10 -0700 (PDT), JohnJohnsn
> <TopCo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> If it's "public record" post it;
>
>
> Citing is required when references are obscure---not accepted,
> recorded historical events.
> ...
Yep, only logical, the reason he can't find it, and you can't cite it is
it doesn't exist, we got that ...
JohnJohnsn
"Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles <Yoor...@Jurgis.net>, a/k/a
<rose...@enetis.net> and <rose...@idt.net>, Left-Wing Lying Liberal
Socialist LOSER Democrat™ (est. 2010-11-02) Gun Control Advocate,
wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:38:03 -0700 (PDT), JohnJohnsn
> <TopCop1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> In order for a person to be found guilty of perjury the government
>> must prove: the person testified under oath before [e.g., the grand
>> jury]; at least one particular statement was false; and the person
>> knew at the time the testimony was false.
>
> You're talking indictment under the criminal code
Pay close attention here, Gary:
"In order for a person to be found guilty of perjury the government
must prove: the person testified under oath before [e.g., the grand
jury]; at least one particular statement was false; and the person
knew at the time the testimony was false."
What is your evidence to prove that, IF, as you claim, Reagan made
false statements to a grand jury, that he KNEW the statements were
false.
GOTCHA! <snicker>
> Whether or not someone is indicted, doesn't mean that the act didn't
> happen.
You still offer ZERO proof, Gary; just more unsupported assertions.
> In the case of Reagan, he cannot be indicted until removed from office
> using the impeachment clause.
First: Ronald Wilson Reagan died at his home in Bel Air, California on
the afternoon of Saturday, June 5, 2004, so why in the world are you
writing in the present tense???
Second: Care to show ANY statute that prevents the indictment,
prosecution and conviction of a sitting POTUS?
Third: Ronald Reagan's approval ratings:
Ronald Reagan From the People’s Perspective: A Gallup Poll Review
March 18-20, 2002
Approval: 73%
Disapproval: 22%
No Opinion: 5%
-http://media.gallup.com/POLL/Releases/pr040607iii.gif
-http://media.gallup.com/POLL/Releases/pr040607iv.gif
"The People have spoken."
> He can be impeached, then prosecuted
{GIC}
> He can finish his term, then be indicted
Evidence?
> In reagan's case, the evidence of perjury were contained in Grand Jury
> depositions where all, or most, of the deposed witnesses in the John
> Pointdexter issue swore under oath that Reagan testified (under oath)
> falsely, that he did know about the ongoing Iran-Contra schemes, sat
> in on meetings, and gave permission
>
> Reagan also lied to congress
>
> Reagan lied to The public.
>
> In either case, no impeachment because doing so did not fit the "clear
> and present danger" test;
What "clear and present danger test"?
The Constitution of the United States
Article II - The Executive Branch
Section 4 - Disqualification
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United
States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and
Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and
Misdemeanors.
Don't find "clear and present danger" here, Gary.
> ... and because the poor sap was nothing more than
> a drooling idiot by the time he was in his last years.
I didn't see any evidence of his being " drooling idiot" while he was
in office, Gary; unlike you who demonstrate almost daily to your being
a "droolong Yoorghis IDIOT."
However:
The Case For Obama’s Impeachment : Obama Clear And Present Danger!
-http://politicalvelcraft.org/2010/05/25/the-case-for-obamas-
impeachment
"If Ignorance is Bliss, then Lying Left-Wing Liberal Socialist Gary
Richard "Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles must be in Nirvana"
"I found my friends / They're in my head "
--Gary Richard "Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles
george
> On Jun 11, 7:29 pm, Wisconsinite John "Firebottle3" Johnson
>
>
>
> <firebott...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jun 11, 7:22 pm, JohnJohnsn <TopCop1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >> On Jun 11, 6:43 pm, 69-year-old Vapid City, South Dakotan Gary
> >> Richard "Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles <Yoorg...@Jurgis.net>, a/k/a
> >> <rosel...@enetis.net> and <rosel...@idt.net>, Left-Wing Lying Liberal
> >> Socialist LOSER Democrat™ (est. 2010-11-02) Gun Control Advocate,
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>> On 6/11/2011 4:12 PM, Gray Ghost wrote:
> >>>>> ...
> >>>>> Vitter? It was a commercial transaction between an adult male and
> >>>>> an adult female. Personally I don't think prostitution should be illegal.
>
> >>>>> Foley?
> >>>>> How about Studds, you crawling bucket of shit.
> >>>>> He actually fucked a 17 yo male page.
> >>>>> And got a standing ovation from his fellow deviants when
> >>>>> he returned to the House.
>
> >>>> Into this dark, evil and dangerous world, we need some public servants
> >>>> to bring us light and help lead us out of our problems and darkness ...
>
> >>> Like Reagan?
>
> >> The more you present a leftist with factual evidence that is counter
> >> to his preconceived world view and the more difficult it becomes for
> >> him to refute it without losing face the chance of him changing his
> >> criteria (goal post move) approaches infinity.
>
> >> > He committed perjury in the Pointdexter deposition
>
>
> >> Perjury
>
> >> Perjury is lying under oath, usually in a court of law, but also under
> >> certain other specific circumstances, such as testifying before
> >> Congress (in the U.S.).
>
> >> Reagan under the sad influences of "plausible deniability" and
> >> Alzheimer's Disease, is to claim to "have no memory".
> >> -http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Perjury
>
> >> List of American federal politicians convicted of crimes
> >> 1981–1988 (Reagan (R) presidency)
> >>-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_federal_politicians_con...
>
> >> Well, Gary; Ronald Wilson Reagan isn't on that list.
>
> >> However, there are quite a few "Ds" on that list. <snicker>
>
> >> Mario Biaggi (D-New York) sentenced to 2½ years.
> >> Robert Garcia (D-New York) sentenced to 2½ years.
> >> Harrison A. Williams Senator (D-New Jersey) Convicted on 9 counts of
> >> bribery and conspiracy. Sentenced to 3 years in prison.
> >> John Jenrette Representative (D-South Carolina) sentenced to two years
> >> in prison for bribery and conspiracy.
> >> Raymond Lederer (D-Pennsylvania) "I can give you me" he said after
> >> accepting $50K. Sentenced to 3 years.
> >> Michael Myers (D-Pennsylvania) Accepted $50K saying, "...money talks
> >> and bullshit walks." Sentenced to 3 years and was expelled from the
> >> House.
> >> Frank Thompson (D-New Jersey) Sentenced to 3 years.
> >> John M. Murphy (D-New York) Served 20 months of a 3-year sentence.
> >> Mario Biaggi (D-New York), Convicted of obstruction of justice and
> >> accepting illegal gratuities he was sentenced to 2½ years in prison
> >> and fined $500K for his role in the Wedtech scandal, see above. Just
> >> before expulsion from the House, he resigned. The next year he was
> >> convicted of another 15 counts of obstruction and bribery. (1988)
> >> James Traficant (D-Ohio), convicted of ten felony counts including
> >> bribery, racketeering and tax evasion and sentenced to 8 years in
> >> prison. He was expelled from the House July 24, (2002)
> >> Frederick W. Richmond (D-New York),Convicted of tax evasion and
> >> possession of marijuana. Served 9 months (1982)
> >> Dan Flood (D-Pennsylvania) censured for bribery. After a trial ended
> >> in a deadlocked jury, pleaded guilty and was sentenced to a year's
> >> probation.
> >> Joshua Eilberg (D-Pennsylvania) pleaded guilty to conflict-of-interest
> >> charges. In addition, he convinced president Carter to fire the U.S.
> >> Attorney investigating his case.
> >> Alcee Hastings (D-Florida), Federal District court judge impeached by
> >> the House and convicted by the Senate of soliciting a bribe (1989).
> >> Subsequently elected to the U.S. House of Representatives (1992)
> >> Harry Claiborne (D-Nebraska), Federal District court Judge impeached
> >> by the House and convicted by the Senate on two counts of tax evasion.
> >> He served over one year in prison.
>
> >> "The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant;
> >> it's just that they know so much that isn't so."
> >> — Ronald Wilson Reagan
>
> > deficits. Only to be continued by Big Bush and little bush.
>
> > Raygunomics never worked and never will.
>
> "The U.S. economy experienced substantial turbulence during the Reagan
> years despite favorable general economic conditions. This was the
> "creative destruction" that is characteristic of a healthy economy. At
> the end of the Reagan administration, the U.S. economy had experienced
> the longest peacetime expansion ever. The "stagflation" and "malaise"
> that plagued the U.S. economy from 1973 through 1980 were transformed
> by the Reagan economic program into a sustained period of higher
> growth and lower inflation."
> -William A. Niskanen, chairman of the Cato Institute
> AuthorL "Reaganomics"
>
> > My name is John Johnson
> > I come from Wisconsin
> > I make three dollars a day
> > I go to see Nelly
> > And, lay on her belly
> > She takes my three dollars a day
>
> Is that your way of admittting to purchasing sex from cheap whores,
> Johnnie? <snicker>
It's an old 'bush shanty' and he hasn't got it correct.
Which is more or less what one would expect
Gray Ghost
4ax.com:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 06:38:03 -0700 (PDT), JohnJohnsn
><TopCo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>In order for a person to be found guilty of perjury the government
>>must prove: the person testified under oath before [e.g., the grand
>>jury]; at least one particular statement was false; and the person
>>knew at the time the testimony was false.
>
> You're talking indictment under the criminal code
No dingleberry i'm talking about what actually happened.
>
> Whether or not someone is indicted, doesn't mean that the act didn't
> happen.
Well, some evidence is always nice.
> In the case of Reagan, he cannot be indicted until removed from office
> using the impeachment clause.
>
> He can be impeached, then prosecuted
>
> He can finish his term, then be indicted
Reagan has been out of office going 23 years and has been dead for some
time. Or haven't you read a newspaper lately?
> In reagan's case, the evidence of perjury were contained in Grand Jury
> depositions where all, or most, of the deposed witnesses in the John
> Pointdexter issue swore under oath that Reagan testified (under oath)
> falsely, that he did know about the ongoing Iran-Contra schemes, sat
> in on meetings, and gave permission
In Reagan's case nobody thought there was a case. Which may explain why the
Democrat controlled House didn't impeach him, stupid.
> Reagan also lied to congress
Even were I to stipulate to the truth of that, what is your point. Every
President lies to Congress. Ever hear of Bull Clinton.
And, oh yeah, how's the war in Libya and the secret war in Yemen working
out?
> Reagan lied to The public.
Oh please.
> In either case, no impeachment because doing so did not fit the "clear
> and present danger" test; and because the poor sap was nothing more
> than a drooling idiot by the time he was in his last years.
You think that a President lieing to Congress regarding foreign policy does
not fit the "clear and present danger" test? Are you like 3? Oh wait you're
a Dumbocrat!
A drooling idiot that smoked the Dems in 2 Presdential elections, left the
economy in much better condition than he found it and oh yeah, drove our
sorn enemy of the Cold War into the ground, without a general war.
I'll take more drooling idiots like that anytime.
It's a pity you have your head shoved up your partisan ass so far. Or maybe
not. If you sneeze maybe you can blowout a hemmoroid and bleed out quickly.
You're angry becuase your chikldish and warped vsioin of the how the woprld
should be has been proven to be a disaster and your drooling isiot of a
hero is going to repudated in 2012.
John Smith
Nope, nothing there but someones personal opinion, I don't know, chit,
he might have just copied it off some chit-house wall!
Burr
Very strong??
--
Burr
From The Gardens
Roses & Orchids
Guiguinto, Bulacan. Philippines
http://www.guiguinto.gov.ph/
And Red Mountain, Ca. USA
I’m a member of The Tea Party, I VOTE
RHF
> Roy, did he really say all those bad thing I heard some TV show say he did?
>
> Very strong??
> --
> Burr
> From The Gardens
> Roses & Orchids
> And Red Mountain, Ca. USA
> I’m a member of The Tea Party, I VOTE
Yes Burr Weiner is a Total 'Sicko' Weiner !
Pelosi is a 'Sicko' Weiner !
Reid is a 'Sicko' Weiner !
Obama is a 'Sicko' Weiner !
Just Say 'NO' To 'Sicko' Weiners in 2012 !
.
.
WeinerGate© : 'Sicko' Weiner [D-NY] Admits to Being
a Real 'Weiner' a Lying "Sexting" Jerk-Off-in-Office !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/092606c0bf7bc23f
.
? So Why Hasn't The DOJ-FBI Opened A Case File
On 'Sicko' Weiner's Sexting To A Teenage Girl !
-obama-cover-up- -holder-cover-up- -mueller-cover-up-
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/5218105c66d5f19f
.
So Why Hasn't The DOJ-FBI Opened A Case File
On 'Sicko' Weiner's Sexting To A Teenage Girl !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/82ef28a285023499
.
WeinerGate© Liberal Democrat Internet Pedophiles
Like The 'Sicko' Weiner -sicko-sicko-sicko-sicko-
-serious-allegations- -serious-allegations-
=Requires=A=Complete=Independent=Investigation=
-'no'-obama-regime-cover-up- : WaterGate !
-'no'-doj-ag-holder-cover-up- : WaterGate !
-'no'-fbi-mueler-cover-up- : WaterGate !
.
Weiner the 'Sicko' Liberal !
-just-like- Obama : Pelosi : Reid
Liberals All -sicko-liberals-sickos-
Just Say 'NO' To Sickos In 2012 !
WeinerGate© WeinerGate© WeinerGate©
.
Weiner the 'Sicko' Democrat !
-just-like- Obama : Pelosi : Reid
Democrats All -sicko-democrats-sickos-
Just Say 'NO' To Sickos In 2012 !
WeinerGate© WeinerGate© WeinerGate©
.
WeinerGate© : 'Sicko' Weiner [D-NY] Admits
to Being a Real 'Weiner' a Lying "Sexting"
Jerk-Off-in-Office !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/e064b7e88a9fa47f
.
.
baracking weiner = weinering barack
-bringing-down-the-regime-in-2012-
.
.
Tom Gardner
"Joe from Kokomo" wrote in message news:it2j35$o43$3...@dont-email.me...
**********************************************
So, citing bad behavior justifies more bad behavior. Yep, makes perfect
sense.
Gray Ghost
> On 6/11/2011 10:20 PM, RHF wrote:
Who wants' him to resign. I want his ugly mug all over the election in
2012. Let the deviant stay.
John Smith
>> ...
>> Ol' Joe from Kokomo says Weiner should resign...right *after* Vitter
>> does. What could be more fair than that, hmmmm?
>>
>
> Who wants' him to resign. I want his ugly mug all over the election in
> 2012. Let the deviant stay.
>
True, the real sickos are the ones giving money and supporting cruds
like him on the ballots, it is the "closet sickos" who are behind the
curtain with which we need to begin applying the cure for our problems on.
Or, simply, they will just find another whacko to run for office and
groom and position him/her ... and, this will be a reoccurring problem
until fixed, permanently.
Joe from Kokomo
>> You're sure doing a lot of whining about Weiner.
>>
>> How odd that I don't remember you saying anything at all against David
>> Vitter (R)-Louisiana who committed an arguably worse crime than Weiner.
>> Any reason you had no comment on Vitter? Blind partisanship? Selective
>> memory? Hypocrisy?
>>
>> You must be taking your cue from Eric Cantor (R)-Virginia who said:
>>
>> a) "We should pray for Mr. Vitter's family".
>>
>> b) "Weiner should resign".
>>
>> You presumably have some intelligence, so don't you detect just the
>> slightest bit of hypocrisy here?
>>
>> Ol' Joe from Kokomo says Weiner should resign...right *after* Vitter
>> does. What could be more fair than that, hmmmm?
On 6/12/2011 1:06 PM, Gray Ghost wrote:
> I dunno, do you really think a commercial transaction between an adult male
> and an adult female is worse than sending pictures of your junk to
> anonymous women on the internet and putting yourself in a position to be
> blackmailed...
You keep saying "commercial transaction", but you conveniently overlook
the fact that it was an *ILLEGAL* commercial transaction. You also don't
address the ethical violations of his (legal) marriage contract.
Sending pictures is not illegal. Perverted? Maybe. Unethical? Maybe.
Illegal? No.
> ...and oh BTW one of his cuties, at least one of which was 17 yo
> making him a sexual predator?
Not really. At least he claims the 17 yr old web contact was not sexual.
In any event, it sounded like all the web 'conversations' were mutual,
hardly putting it in the "predator" category.
All I am pointing out is the *hypocrisy* of Vitter still being on the
job. BOTH should go.
Joe from Kokomo
On 6/13/2011 5:29 AM, Tom Gardner wrote:
> So, citing bad behavior justifies more bad behavior. Yep, makes perfect
> sense.
No, just citing the HYPOCRISY of Vitter still being on the job. Please
pay attention.
RHF
> > "Joe from Kokomo" wrote in messagenews:it2j35$o43$3...@dont-email.me...
Joe from Kokomo,
More Proof That Weiner is a Total 'Sicko' Weiner !
Making Pelosi a 'Sicko' Weiner Too !
Making Reid a 'Sicko' Weiner Too !
Making Obama a 'Sicko' Weiner Too !
Just Say 'NO' To 'Sicko' Weiners in 2012 !
.
TMZ Reveals Weiner Sexting Photos On-the-Job in
The House GYM : That's a Clear Ethics Violation !
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/brooklyn/weiner_trapped_gym_rat_fQgQvnOm8vo65NdfnZBFeO
The 11 More 'Sexting' Photos from GYM in the
'Rayburn' US House Office Building.
http://newsone.com/newsone-original/ggaynor/busted-weiner-gym-photo/
Gray Ghost
>
>> Joe from Kokomo<j...@indy.net> wrote in
>> news:it2j35$o43$3...@dont-email.me:
>
>>> You're sure doing a lot of whining about Weiner.
>>>
>>> How odd that I don't remember you saying anything at all against David
>>> Vitter (R)-Louisiana who committed an arguably worse crime than
>>> Weiner. Any reason you had no comment on Vitter? Blind partisanship?
>>> Selective memory? Hypocrisy?
>>>
>>> You must be taking your cue from Eric Cantor (R)-Virginia who said:
>>>
>>> a) "We should pray for Mr. Vitter's family".
>>>
>>> b) "Weiner should resign".
>>>
>>> You presumably have some intelligence, so don't you detect just the
>>> slightest bit of hypocrisy here?
>>>
>>> Ol' Joe from Kokomo says Weiner should resign...right *after* Vitter
>>> does. What could be more fair than that, hmmmm?
>
> On 6/12/2011 1:06 PM, Gray Ghost wrote:
>
>> I dunno, do you really think a commercial transaction between an adult
>> male and an adult female is worse than sending pictures of your junk to
>> anonymous women on the internet and putting yourself in a position to
>> be blackmailed...
>
> You keep saying "commercial transaction", but you conveniently overlook
> the fact that it was an *ILLEGAL* commercial transaction. You also don't
> address the ethical violations of his (legal) marriage contract.
So, you never heard of civil disobediance? Oh no, you don't get to have it
both ways. Democrats are always claiming that the marriage contract didn't
matter. Were you in favor of Bill "Couldn't keep it in hs pants" resigning?
> Sending pictures is not illegal. Perverted? Maybe. Unethical? Maybe.
> Illegal? No.
It's a good way to get blackmailed. Demonstrating extreme irresponsibility
and stupidity.
>> ...and oh BTW one of his cuties, at least one of which was 17 yo
>> making him a sexual predator?
>
> Not really. At least he claims the 17 yr old web contact was not sexual.
Yeah, he claims. After looking into the camera and lieing for over a week.
> In any event, it sounded like all the web 'conversations' were mutual,
> hardly putting it in the "predator" category.
No, just extremely stupid.
> All I am pointing out is the *hypocrisy* of Vitter still being on the
> job. BOTH should go.
I disagree, neither should.
JohnJohnsn
Richard "Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles <Yoor...@Jurgis.net>, a/k/a
<Yoor...@propagandists.dnc.org>, Left-Wing Lying Liberal Socialist
LOSER Democrat™ (est. 2010-11-02) Gun Control Advocate, wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:18:27 -0700 (PDT), JohnJohnsn
> <TopCop1...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Pay close attention here, Gary:
>
>> "In order for a person to be found guilty of perjury the government
>> must prove: the person testified under oath before [e.g., the grand
>> jury]; at least one particular statement was false; and the person
>> knew at the time the testimony was false."
>
> In order to be "found guilty"---one must be indicted.
No, Gary; one must be TRIED by a jury or bench: indictment does not
equal conviction ("found guilty").
> Reagan was not indicted because even though his lies Qualified for an
> indictment and could have led to a conviction---he was not so charged.
IOW: the United States Department of Justice knew there was no case to
pursue; despite your constant assertions.
We'll go with the USDoJ, rather than the "Vapid City Yoorghis IDIOT".
> The turmoil an impeachment would have caused (for REAL justification
> in reagan's case) was mitigated by his CONFESSION and public apology
Post the "CONFESSION" and "public apology," Gary.
> Reagan KNEW the arms were being sold---independent testimony put him
> there and clear and convincing evidence proved it
Post the "convincing evidence," Gary.
> Reagan KNEW the denial was a lie--and the lie was intended to shield
> him from criminal charges
Prove it.
> Reagan ADMITTED that he was present in discussion
Post the "admission," Gary.
> Reagan ADMITTED that his denial was false.
Post the "admission," Gary.
> That makes it perjury----
Prove it, Gary.
> "Indictment" is a separate issue.
The USDoJ didn't seek an indictment because they knew that there was
no case, Gary: prove otherwise or drop your false assertions.
"If Ignorance is Bliss, then Lying Left-Wing Liberal Socialist Gary
Richard "Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles must be in Nirvana"
"I found my friends / They're in my head "
--Gary Richard "Yoorghis IDIOT" Roselles
"History is indeed the witness of the times, the light of truth."
--Marcus Tullius Cicero
RHF
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 12:51:44 -0400, Joe from Kokomo <j...@indy.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >All I am pointing out is the *hypocrisy* of Vitter still being on the
> >job. BOTH should go.
>
>
> NEver was a call for any Republican to resign by any of the GOP
> leadership in 25 years.
>
> >=============================================================
>
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:32:34 -0700 (PDT),
> Kurtis T. Nicklas
>
> <nickl...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
> >I don't pay much attention to him these days, but I'd wager he's not
> >happy.
>
> You sure as shit paid attention when you got caught
> making all those late-night hang-up phone calls, didn't
> ya, Nickkkkers?
>
> CLICK ! ! !
Y@J : You 'Assume' That I Am Here To Debate You
While I 'Know' I Am Here To Propagate The Issue
WeinerGate© WeinerGate© WeinerGate© WeinerGate©
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/96fd794cdba0b665
.
-remember- 'Weiner Is A 'Sicko' Liberal Democrat !
'Sicko' Weiner! 'Sicko' Weiner! 'Sicko' Weiner!
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/96fd794cdba0b665
.
Some One Says 'Weiner' : Naturally You Think 'Sicko'
~political~translation~ 'Sicko' Weiner =s
'Sicko' Obama & 'Sicko' Pelosi & 'Sicko' Reid
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/e064b7e88a9fa47f
.
Some One Says 'Sicko' : Naturally You Think 'Weiner'
~political~translation~ 'Sicko' Weiner =s
'Sicko' Obama & 'Sicko' Pelosi & 'Sicko' Reid
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/63ace2fd1778d614
.
More New 'Sicko' Weiner On-the-Job Sexting Photos !
WeinerGate© Expanding as 'Sicko' Weiner [D-NY] Admits
to Being a Real 'Weiner' a Lying "Sexting" Jerk-Off
Who Is Still-in-Office ! With Obama's Support !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/799147264206c5fc
.
WeinerGate© Is The 'Sicko' Gift That Keeps
On Giving All The Way To 2012 ! -with-
On-the-Job Sexting Photos from the Capital GYM
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/527b3f74d30b40d3
.
? So Why Hasn't The DOJ-FBI Opened A Case File
On 'Sicko' Weiner's Sexting To A Teenage Girl !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/5218105c66d5f19f
-cover-up- -cover-up- -cover-up- -cover-up-
.
.