Hating Whites
-
http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=6671
Hating Whites
Race; Posted on: 2009-02-27
[ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ]
"The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some
may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from
committed white supremacists." Noel Ignatiev
White Skin Privilege
http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=548
We have all heard politicians talk about diversity, tolerance, understanding,
multiculturalism, immigration, integration, assimilation, the melting pot and
so on. What do they mean by this?
And what is their long-term goal? "The goal of abolishing the white race is on
its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could
incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists." So says
former Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev, whose magazine is called "Race
Traitor."
Anti-racists will rarely admit their goal as clearly as Professor Ignatiev
does.
Anti-racists generally will not call themselves "race traitors" or
"anti-white," nor will they call white genocide their goal. Instead of saying
it directly, they call themselves "anti-racist" and then argue for "a melting
pot" where all will be mixed and become brown.
This goal of abolishing the white race can be divided into four basic stages:
(1) The demonization of whites. Another term for this is what is often
referred to as "white guilt";
(2) Third world immigration into all white countries and only into white
countries;
(3) Forced integration as the first step towards assimilation. Assimilation is
not directly forced but everybody who opposes it is condemned for being
"racist";
(4) In addition, anyone who speaks out against any part of the process of
white genocide will be denounced as a "racist", or as a "white supremacist",
or as a "naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews."
The demonization of whites, i.e. the white guilt complex, makes white people
accept non-white immigration, integration and assimilation, leading to a
melting pot where all formerly white countries turn brown, thus eventually
eliminating the white race.
Consider the arguments that the so-called anti-racists use:
Why must white countries have immigration? A commonly used argument for why
America must accept immigration is because white people took the land away
from the native Americans. If that really was the case one might start to
wonder why Germany must accept immigrants. For as we all know, Germans never
took their land away from Indians or any other non-white group.
Then you will notice that anti-racists change their argument. They will now
talk about the evil Nazis, Hitler, and the Holocaust. They say it would be a
disgrace if Germany, with such a history, would discriminate and not take in
non-whites.
So what about Britain and France? Britain and France never took their land
from anyone nor did they support Hitler. Notice that the anti-racists change
their arguments again and pretend to be objectively interested in former
colonial powers taking in immigrants from former colonies.
What about Iceland? The people of Iceland did not take the land away from
anyone, nor did they support Hitler, nor did they have any colonies. Again the
anti-racists will change their arguments in order to support immigration and
say that Iceland has an ageing population needing more workers.
If you have argued with so-called anti-racists, you will notice that they
always have many arguments for why white countries must have immigration.
These arguments, taken as single cases, may seem genuine.
However, consider Japan: Japan was allied with Hitler, had colonies and also
has an ageing population. But Japan does not have massive third world
immigration. Do anti-racists condemn Japan, and accuse Japan of being a racist
country? No! That is because anti-racists are purely anti-white, not
anti-Asian.
Anyone who opposes this agenda is automatically accused of being racist.
The agenda says that the white race is a social construct...except when
someone is to be blamed.
Another argument is that the white race does not exist and therefore there is
no good reason to preserve it. Who is white, the anti-whites will ask?
Anti-whites pretend to have problems with identifying who is white and who is
not when people who want to preserve the white race confront them. But at the
same time they have no problems identifying who is white when they talk about
slavery, colonization, the Holocaust, discrimination, racism and so on.
Anti-racists know, as does everybody, who is white and who is not. The reason
they deny the existence of the white race is because they are justifying white
genocide. And remember; nothing justifies genocide! "Anti-racist" is just a
code word for anti-white.
Article 2 of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of
Genocide from 1948 defines genocide as any of the following acts committed
with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or
religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to
bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Anti-racists, as we know, are anti-white. They are going after all white
countries and only white countries. Through their forcing of immigration,
integration and assimilation into all white countries, and only white
countries, they have shown their intent to destroy the white race in whole.
They are deliberately inflicting on the white race conditions of life
calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole.
Whatever weapons these anti-whites come up with, whether the lynching of
blacks in the American South in times long gone, or the mass killing of Jews
in Germany three generations ago, it is all to justify genocide against the
completely innocent generations of whites today.
These anti-whites think this way. Whatever has been done in the past or
whatever is being done in the present, it can all be used to justify the
genocide and elimination of the white race. Period.
What is our goal as whites?
We who are pro-white want to preserve our race. We believe that all races have
the right to exist, including our race. And it is usually when we say this,
and include our race, that these people who call themselves anti-racists get
mad. We are fighting for our existence, for the right to live.
In the worldview of an anti-white, there is simply no place for white people.
In contrast, according to our worldview there is a place for all races,
including the white race.
News Source: author
2007-2008 European Americans United.
-
eohoe
> http://70.87.245.212/story.php?id=6671
>
> Hating Whites
> Race; Posted on: 2009-02-27
> [ Printer friendly / Instant flyer ]
>
> "The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some
> may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from
> committed white supremacists." Noel Ignatiev
>
>
> White Skin Privilege
> http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=548
<snip>
In the face of a hostile takeover do what the corporations do, use the "poison
pill" defense.
No to the mindcontrollers. No to the privately held Central Banking system. No
to the One True God religions. No to the NWO. No to the liberals/communists. No
to the Faggots. No to diversity. No to miscegenation. No to the Alien Hybrids!
The Lord thy God is a mighty fortress.
--
If it ain't White bread it's Alien Hybrid!