The world marks 60 years of zionist terror
Anarchore
terror, at: http://www.gregfelton.com
"We are to admire a state that tortures children, ransacks orphanages,
humiliates and terrorizes non-Jews as a matter of national policy, and
has openly threatened genocide against Palestinians if they stand up
for themselves??!!"
http://www.gregfelton.com/int_politics/2008_05_13.htm
The world marks 60 years of zionist terror made possible by a corrupt
U.S. president
Canadian Arab News
May 13, 2008 (expanded)
Over the past few weeks, The Lobby and its Christian acolytes in
government and the media have been forcing the world’s governments to
celebrate 60 years of Israeli “statehood.” Even the three U.S.
presidential [sic] nominees are falling over themselves to pay homage
to their political master.
I said “forcing” because I find it impossible to believe that any
law-abiding democratic government would of its own free will celebrate
a geopolitical perversity founded on torture, theft, murder,
gangsterism and blackmail. If that were not the case we should have
seen official celebrations of:
• Nazi Germany (Jan. 30, 1933);
• Chile’s military dictatorship (Sept. 11, 1973); or
• Democratic Kampuchea (April 17, 1975).
These tyrannies, fortunately, have all wound up on the ash heap of
history. The fact that the same fate has not befallen the Jewish
tyranny in Palestine is entirely due to the coercive power of The Lobby
and the corruption of President Harry Truman, who, 60 years ago, sold
the U.S.’s political soul for the sake of re-election.
The following account from Edwin Wright, Middle East specialist for
Near East-South Asian-African Affairs, shows what sort of soul-selling
coercion was put on Truman:
“When the election was coming up in 1946 in New York, [a] group of New
York Jews called upon Mr. Truman. Emmanuel Cellar was the head of this
committee. Rabbi Steven Wise and several others were in it. They called
upon Mr. Truman and said, ‘We have just been talking with Mr. [Tom]
Thomas Dewey. He is willing to come out and declare for a Jewish state,
and we are going to turn our money and urge the Jews to vote for him
unless you beat him to it.’ Then Emmanuel Cellar pounded upon Mr.
Truman’s desk and said, ‘And if you don't come out for a Jewish state
we’ll run you out of town.’”*
Against his better judgment Truman capitulated, but his statement on
the founding of Israel is anything but a ringing endorsement.
Truman’s Act of Betrayal
The handwritten edits belong to presidential advisor Clark Clifford,
who was pre-occupied with Truman's chances for re-election.
• “Provisional” is added to the description of the new government,
thereby distancing the U.S. from full recognition and endorsement;
• “Jewish state” is crossed out in favour of “State of Israel.”
Based upon this document it’s hard to tell that the U.S. even
recognized Israel as a legitimate state. In fact, the creation of
Israel is mired in so much coercion, blackmail and bribery that any
reasonable student of the event would have to conclude that Israel has
never had a moral right to exist. For The Lobby, therefore, the
historical record is very much something to be feared since it contains
the truth about Israel’s origins.
Since this history is accessible to any discerning scholar via the
Internet, the Lobby has to do more than spread lies about Jews finding
“empty” Palestine, censor of contrary information, and smear those who
stand up for honest scholarship. History, itself, has to be torqued to
support the myths of Israeli legitimacy and necessity.
A May 7 opinion piece by former U.S. diplomat and Washington Post
columnist Richard Holbrooke is an excellent example of the kind of
slick, tendentious dissembling that masquerades as plausible
scholarship.
As Holbrooke describes the matter, Truman and his neophyte domestic
political advisor Clark Clifford, who would later make the textual
changes to Truman's statement, were virtually alone in supporting
partition and recognition of Israel, whereas the highly respected
Secretary of State George C. Marshall and almost the entire foreign
policy establishment wanted Palestine to be placed under UN trusteeship.
The big problem for the reader is less what Holbrooke says but
Holbrooke himself. How far can he be trusted? What is he not telling?
Is the picture he paints believable? On the one hand, Holbrooke has
great credentials and intimate knowledge of the event. On the other
hand, he co-authored Clifford’s memoirs, which means his version of
events is biased.
This bias comes through in his subtle denigration of the foreign policy
establishment. He praises Marshall and the “wise men” who formulated
“the great Truman foreign policy of the late 1940s” but he never gives
us insight into their arguments. They are mentioned only to be
attacked. Holbrooke even invokes the canard of “anti-Semitism” to
condemn Defence Secretary James Forrestal for having pointed out the
uselessness of sacrificing the interests of 30 million Arabs for the
sake of 600,000 Jews.
For Holbrooke, the anti-recognition side was driven by the parochial
interests of “oil, numbers and history.” Those for recognition were all
sweetness and light. Not surprisingly, Holbrooke makes no mention of
zionist strong-arm tactics, the corrupting influence of zionists on the
1948 election, or the electoral imperative of selling out. According to
Loy Henderson, director of Near Eastern and African Affairs:
“If Truman had taken positions that would have resulted in a failure to
establish the Jewish State, he would almost certainly have been
defeated in the November elections, since the Zionists had almost the
full support of the Congress, the United States media and most of the
American people.Ӡ
Against this observation and the abovementioned reports of zionist
threats, Holbrooke offers this weak apologia: “Clifford insisted to me
and others in countless discussions over the next 40 years that
politics was not at the root of his position—moral conviction was.”
If that be the case, how does Holbrooke explain what happened to
Henderson (and doubtless others) who championed UN trusteeship out of
moral conviction? As Edwin Wright recounted:
“The Zionists went to various people like Drew Pearson and Walter
Winchell and said, ‘Smear this fellow. Destroy his character and get
him out of Government.’… The result was Mr. Henderson became the target
of Zionist attacks. All kinds of false stories were told about him in
these columns by Walter Winchell and others. I was at that time Mr.
Henderson’s assistant and I answered many of the letters, because he
didn’t have time to do it himself. I was his sort of alter ego in
handling much of this correspondence, and I saw the kind of letters
that he got. They were vituperative. Walter Winchell accused him of
crucifying the Jews the way that the Jews had been crucified earlier,
and so forth, and so on…”§
If Truman had taken positions that would have resulted in a failure to
establish the Jewish State, he would almost certainly have been
defeated in the November elections, since the Zionists had almost the
full support of the Congress, the United States media and most of the
American people.
Loy Henderson
Holbrooke presents Truman’s decision to recognize Israel as a rational
choice between two alternatives, but rationality had nothing to do with
it. Truman caved under pressure. Contrary to Holbrooke's assertion,
Truman was neither wholly opposed to UN trusteeship of Palestine nor
wedded to the idea of partition. In a March 25, 1948 statement, Truman
declared support for trusteeship, albeit temporarily, to stabilize the
region and maintain law and order:
“It has become clear that the partition plan cannot be carried out at
this time by peaceful means. We could not undertake to impose this
solution on the people of Palestine by the use of American troops, both
on Charter grounds and as a matter of national policy. The United
Kingdom has announced its firm intention to abandon its mandate in
Palestine on May 15. Unless emergency action is taken, there will be no
public authority in Palestine on that date capable of preserving law
and order.…
“The United States has proposed to the Security Council a temporary
United Nations trusteeship for Palestine to provide a government to
keep the peace. Such trusteeship was proposed only after we had
exhausted every effort to find a way to carry out partition by peaceful
means. Trusteeship is not proposed as a substitute for the partition
plan but as an effort to fill the vacuum soon to be created by the
termination of the mandate on May 15.”
Besides painting a false black-and-white view of conflict over Israel,
Holbrooke commits serious errors of omission. He causally speaks of the
partition of Palestine as if it were a legitimate option, but the UN’s
Partition Plan passed by the General Assembly on Nov. 29, 1947, was not
legitimate. The UN had no authority to take land from one people to
give to another, and even if it had, the plan was not ratified by the
Security Council, which means it does not exist. Since the plan was
never ratified, partition was never a legitimate option; because
partition was never a legitimate option, Truman had no legal basis for
recognizing Israel.
Now, watch as Holbrooke tries to trick the reader: “To this day, many
think that Marshall and Lovett were right on the merits and that
domestic politics was the real reason for Truman's decision. Israel,
they argue, has been nothing but trouble for the United States.”
“It has become clear that the partition plan cannot be carried out at
this time by peaceful means. We could not undertake to impose this
solution on the people of Palestine by the use of American troops, both
on Charter grounds and as a matter of national policy.
President Harry Truman
Bang on accurate! But now comes the cheat: “I think this misses the
point. Israel was going to come into existence whether or not
Washington recognized it. But without American support from the very
beginning, Israel’s survival would have been at even greater risk…”
What about the Arabs' survival? Israel has been nothing but trouble for
the United States, but note how Holbrooke mentions this fact only to
discredit it. Now comes the point of the piece:
“Truman’s decision, although opposed by almost the entire foreign
policy establishment, was the right one—and despite complicated
consequences that continue to this day, it is a decision all Americans
should recognize and admire.”
We are to admire a state that tortures children, ransacks orphanages,
humiliates and terrorizes non-Jews as a matter of national policy, and
has openly threatened genocide against Palestinians if they stand up
for themselves??!!
It’s a matter of debate which is the more responsible for the
Palestinian genocide—the perpetrator (Israel) or the facilitator (the
U.S.) Can a monster, following its nature, be held responsible for
committing atrocities if its creator, knowing the monster’s nature,
deliberately failed to prevent the atrocities and then actively
participated in them?
More than a just celebration [sic] of Israeli “statehood,” May 15
commemorates The Lobby’s purchase of the White House, and the beginning
of the U.S.’s role as an accessory to a war crime. This is the real
history that Holbrooke and others try to cover up.
Sources
* Cited in Greg Felton, The Host and the Parasite—How Israel’s Fifth
Column Consumed America, pp. 27–28.
† Ibid., p. 27.
§ Ibid., p. 28.
sdgreen
"Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote in message
news:hMidnZ05wuNbGLHV...@posted.uniservecommunications...
>A great new(to me) anti-Zionist site, in this age of appeasement of
> terror, at: http://www.gregfelton.com
>
> "We are to admire a state that tortures children, ransacks orphanages,
> humiliates and terrorizes non-Jews as a matter of national policy, and
> has openly threatened genocide against Palestinians if they stand up
> for themselves??!!"
>
>
> http://www.gregfelton.com/int_politics/2008_05_13.htm
>
> The world marks 60 years of zionist terror made possible by a corrupt
> U.S. president
> Canadian Arab News
> May 13, 2008 (expanded)
>
> Over the past few weeks, The Lobby and its Christian acolytes in
> government and the media have been forcing the world's governments to
> celebrate 60 years of Israeli "statehood." Even the three U.S.
> presidential [sic] nominees are falling over themselves to pay homage
> to their political master.
much bs snipped
up.
>
> Sources
> * Cited in Greg Felton, The Host and the Parasite-How Israel's Fifth
> Column Consumed America, pp. 27-28.
> ? Ibid., p. 27.
> § Ibid., p. 28.
What utter bullshit. Perhaps you need to review the history of this region.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Mandate_of_Palestine#Transjordan
You will discover that the issue of the disintigration of the OTTOMAN
Empire, which had control over the entire Mesopotemian region for almost 500
years created significant issues in 1923 for the region. The League of
Nations (predessor of the United Nations) had to consider the mess that was
left behind. The creation of a Statehood for Israel had always been
considered by the League. Further, if it was not for the stupid Arabs who
went to war with Israel in 1948, Palistine would likely be a Nation today,
as was envisioned by the League.
==================
Mr.Smartypants
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 13:49:42 -0500, "Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote:
>
> There must a site that exploits the torture of babies and young girls
> you can get your teeth into, maybe even torturing the disabled. Give
> it a try.
>
What the Jews are doing to the Palestinians ranks right up there with
anything Stalin did to the Ukrainians or Hitler did to Jews, gypsies,
gays, Slavs, etc.
Zionist Israel has to be done away with, just like Hitler's Germany
was.
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
sdgreen
"Mr.Smartypants" <bc...@canada.com> wrote in message
news:5124b775-b946-4b31...@p39g2000prm.googlegroups.com...
On May 16, 4:51 am, E. Barry Bruyea <lobbyi...@goaway.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 13:49:42 -0500, "Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote:
>
> There must a site that exploits the torture of babies and young girls
> you can get your teeth into, maybe even torturing the disabled. Give
> it a try.
>
What the Jews are doing to the Palestinians ranks right up there with
anything Stalin did to the Ukrainians or Hitler did to Jews, gypsies,
gays, Slavs, etc.
Zionist Israel has to be done away with, just like Hitler's Germany
was.
NONSENSE
Anarchore
>On Thu, 15 May 2008 13:49:42 -0500, "Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote:
>
>There must a site that exploits the torture of babies and young girls
>you can get your teeth into, maybe even torturing the disabled. Give
>it a try.
>
--
If you're thick enough to believe that Jews are your enemy why the
fuck would I want to have anything to do with you.
Consider me a Jew.
Consider me a fag.
Consider me an immigrant.
Anarchore
>On May 16, 4:51 am, E. Barry Bruyea <lobbyi...@goaway.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 May 2008 13:49:42 -0500, "Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote:
>>
>> There must a site that exploits the torture of babies and young
>>girls you can get your teeth into, maybe even torturing the
>>disabled. Give it a try.
>>
>
>
>
>What the Jews are doing to the Palestinians ranks right up there with
>anything Stalin did to the Ukrainians or Hitler did to Jews, gypsies,
>gays, Slavs, etc.
Except Hitler didn't have his agents owning the press and controlling
the political life of western countries.
>
>Zionist Israel has to be done away with, just like Hitler's Germany
>was.
But where would we send the Zionofascists to then?
--
Anarchore
Yes if only they capitulated to the invaders, the Jewish psycopaths and
baby-killers would have rolled over and given Palestinians a state?
LMAO!
klunk
> Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>
>>On May 16, 4:51 am, E. Barry Bruyea <lobbyi...@goaway.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 15 May 2008 13:49:42 -0500, "Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote:
>>>
>>> There must a site that exploits the torture of babies and young
>>>girls you can get your teeth into, maybe even torturing the
>>>disabled. Give it a try.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>What the Jews are doing to the Palestinians ranks right up there with
>>anything Stalin did to the Ukrainians or Hitler did to Jews, gypsies,
>>gays, Slavs, etc.
>
> Except Hitler didn't have his agents owning the press and controlling
> the political life of western countries.
joseph goebbels thanks you... ;-)
>>Zionist Israel has to be done away with, just like Hitler's Germany
>>was.
>
> But where would we send the Zionofascists to then?
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >A great new(to me) anti-Zionist site, in this age of appeasement
>>>of >terror, at:http://www.gregfelton.com
>>>
>>> >"We are to admire a state that tortures children, ransacks
>>>orphanages, >humiliates and terrorizes non-Jews as a matter of
>>>national policy, and >has openly threatened genocide against
>>>Palestinians if they stand up >for themselves??!!"
>>>
>>> >http://www.gregfelton.com/int_politics/2008_05_13.htm
>>>
>>> >The world marks 60 years of zionist terror made possible by a
>>>corrupt >U.S. president
>>> >Canadian Arab News
>>> >May 13, 2008 (expanded)
>>>
>>> >Over the past few weeks, The Lobby and its Christian acolytes in
>>> >government and the media have been forcing the world's
>>>governments to >celebrate 60 years of Israeli "statehood." Even
>>>the three U.S. >presidential [sic] nominees are falling over
>>>themselves to pay homage >to their political master.
>>>
>>> >I said "forcing" because I find it impossible to believe that any
>>> >law-abiding democratic government would of its own free will
>>>celebrate >a geopolitical perversity founded on torture, theft,
>>>murder, >gangsterism and blackmail. If that were not the case we
>>>should have >seen official celebrations of:
>>>
>>> >. Nazi Germany (Jan. 30, 1933);
>>> >. Chile's military dictatorship (Sept. 11, 1973); or
>>> >. Democratic Kampuchea (April 17, 1975).
>>>
>>> >These tyrannies, fortunately, have all wound up on the ash heap of
>>> >history. The fact that the same fate has not befallen the Jewish
>>> >tyranny in Palestine is entirely due to the coercive power of The
>>>Lobby >and the corruption of President Harry Truman, who, 60 years
>>>ago, sold >the U.S.'s political soul for the sake of re-election.
>>>
>>> >The following account from Edwin Wright, Middle East specialist
>>>for >Near East-South Asian-African Affairs, shows what sort of
>>>soul-selling >coercion was put on Truman:
>>>
>>> >"When the election was coming up in 1946 in New York, [a] group
>>>of New >York Jews called upon Mr. Truman. Emmanuel Cellar was the
>>>head of this >committee. Rabbi Steven Wise and several others were
>>>in it. They called >upon Mr. Truman and said, 'We have just been
>>>talking with Mr. [Tom] >Thomas Dewey. He is willing to come out
>>>and declare for a Jewish state, >and we are going to turn our
>>>money and urge the Jews to vote for him >unless you beat him to
>>>it.' Then Emmanuel Cellar pounded upon Mr. >Truman's desk and
>>>said, 'And if you don't come out for a Jewish state >we'll run you
>>>out of town.'"*
>>>
>>> >Against his better judgment Truman capitulated, but his statement
>>>on >the founding of Israel is anything but a ringing endorsement.
>>> >Truman's Act of Betrayal
>>> >The handwritten edits belong to presidential advisor Clark
>>>Clifford, >who was pre-occupied with Truman's chances for
>>>re-election.
>>>
>>> >. "Provisional" is added to the description of the new government,
>>> >thereby distancing the U.S. from full recognition and endorsement;
>>> >. "Jewish state" is crossed out in favour of "State of Israel."
>>>media and most of the >American people."?
>>>
>>> >Against this observation and the abovementioned reports of zionist
>>> >threats, Holbrooke offers this weak apologia: "Clifford insisted
>>>to me >and others in countless discussions over the next 40 years
>>>that >politics was not at the root of his position-moral
>>>conviction was."
>>>
>>> >If that be the case, how does Holbrooke explain what happened to
>>> >Henderson (and doubtless others) who championed UN trusteeship
>>>out of >moral conviction? As Edwin Wright recounted:
>>>
>>> >"The Zionists went to various people like Drew Pearson and Walter
>>> >Winchell and said, 'Smear this fellow. Destroy his character and
>>>get >him out of Government.'. The result was Mr. Henderson became
>>>the target >of Zionist attacks. All kinds of false stories were
>>>told about him in >these columns by Walter Winchell and others. I
>>>was at that time Mr. >Henderson's assistant and I answered many
>>>of the letters, because he >didn't have time to do it himself. I
>>>was his sort of alter ego in >handling much of this
>>>correspondence, and I saw the kind of letters >that he got. They
>>>were vituperative. Walter Winchell accused him of >crucifying the
>>>Jews the way that the Jews had been crucified earlier, >and so
>>>forth, and so on."§ > If Truman had taken positions that would
>>>have resulted in a failure to >establish the Jewish State, he
>>>would almost certainly have been >defeated in the November
>>>elections, since the Zionists had almost the >full support of the
>>>Congress, the United States media and most of the >American people.
>>> >Loy Henderson
>>> >Holbrooke presents Truman's decision to recognize Israel as a
>>>rational >choice between two alternatives, but rationality had
>>>nothing to do with >it. Truman caved under pressure. Contrary to
>>>Holbrooke's assertion, >Truman was neither wholly opposed to UN
>>>trusteeship of Palestine nor >wedded to the idea of partition. In
>>>a March 25, 1948 statement, Truman >declared support for
>>>trusteeship, albeit temporarily, to stabilize the >region and
>>>maintain law and order:
>>>
>>> >"It has become clear that the partition plan cannot be carried
>>>out at >this time by peaceful means. We could not undertake to
>>>impose this >solution on the people of Palestine by the use of
>>>American troops, both >on Charter grounds and as a matter of
>>>national policy. The United >Kingdom has announced its firm
>>>intention to abandon its mandate in >Palestine on May 15. Unless
>>>emergency action is taken, there will be no >public authority in
>>>Palestine on that date capable of preserving law >and order..
Anarchore
>
>"Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote in message
>news:B4idnQksQvzBT7HV...@posted.uniservecommunications...
>>Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>
>>>On May 16, 4:51 am, E. Barry Bruyea <lobbyi...@goaway.com> wrote:
>>>>On Thu, 15 May 2008 13:49:42 -0500, "Anarchore" <e...@t.me>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>There must a site that exploits the torture of babies and young
>>>>girls you can get your teeth into, maybe even torturing the
>>>>disabled. Give it a try.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>What the Jews are doing to the Palestinians ranks right up there
>>>with anything Stalin did to the Ukrainians or Hitler did to Jews,
>>>gypsies, gays, Slavs, etc.
>>
>>Except Hitler didn't have his agents owning the press and
>>controlling the political life of western countries.
>
>joseph goebbels thanks you... ;-)
Hey, he would have loved it!
klunk
> klunk wrote:
>
>>
>>"Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote in message
>>news:B4idnQksQvzBT7HV...@posted.uniservecommunications...
>>>Mr.Smartypants wrote:
>>>
>>>>On May 16, 4:51 am, E. Barry Bruyea <lobbyi...@goaway.com> wrote:
>>>>>On Thu, 15 May 2008 13:49:42 -0500, "Anarchore" <e...@t.me>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>There must a site that exploits the torture of babies and young
>>>>>girls you can get your teeth into, maybe even torturing the
>>>>>disabled. Give it a try.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>What the Jews are doing to the Palestinians ranks right up there
>>>>with anything Stalin did to the Ukrainians or Hitler did to Jews,
>>>>gypsies, gays, Slavs, etc.
>>>
>>>Except Hitler didn't have his agents owning the press and
>>>controlling the political life of western countries.
>>
>>joseph goebbels thanks you... ;-)
>
> Hey, he would have loved it!
ya... you're doing his propoganda for him beyond the grave... ;-)
sdgreen
Not true. Read up on the leaders of Trans-Jordan.....................
The man himself
This is standard disinformation. Also, it has been widely reported
that Zionists have sabotaged Wikipedia articles, which means anyone
who relies on Wikipedia is either lazy, uninformed or dishonest.
The lie of Arab aggression has been thoroughly debunked.
Typical of disinformation is the above post is the line "the stupid
Arabs who> went to war with Israel in 1948." The Arabs are not
"stupid" and DID NOT go to war. The zionists fired the first shots and
the Arabs responded to stop the flight of refugees. In fact, the Arab
states had EVERY RIGHT AND DUTY to come to the aid of the
Palestinians.
What Hitler did to Jews, Jews are doing to Arabs. No amount of
dissembling can alter that fact.
Read Chapter 3 of The Host and the Parasite—How Israel's Fifth Column
Consumed America. The documentary evidence
mich
"sdgreen" <sd.g...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:bp1Xj.139390$rd2.56539@pd7urf3no...
You are an ignorant fucking idiot.
sdgreen
Hardly balanced material. Felton's writing edges on hard core radical
Islamic material close to that of Bin Laden. He hates everything except
the Islamic warmongering.
==
Dan Clore
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 19:18:08 -0500, "Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote:
>> Yes if only they capitulated to the invaders, the Jewish psycopaths
>> and baby-killers would have rolled over and given Palestinians a
>> state? LMAO!
>
> They were given a State, 60 years ago, idiot, but they decided they
> wanted it all and lost.
"They, they." Nice bit of collectivism there.
--
Dan Clore
My collected fiction, _The Unspeakable and Others_:
http://tinyurl.com/2gcoqt
Lord We˙rdgliffe & Necronomicon Page:
http://tinyurl.com/292yz9
News & Views for Anarchists & Activists:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/smygo
Strange pleasures are known to him who flaunts the
immarcescible purple of poetry before the color-blind.
-- Clark Ashton Smith, "Epigrams and Apothegms"
BDK
c1118f...@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>, gr...@gregfelton.com says...
> Consumed America. The documentary evidence
>
Drugs are great, aren't they?
So, what are you on now?
--
BDK
Kook Magnet Supreme!
NJJC#1
Shill #1
Keon
>
> E. Barry Bruyea wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 May 2008 19:18:08 -0500, "Anarchore" <e...@t.me> wrote:
>
> >> Yes if only they capitulated to the invaders, the Jewish psycopaths
> >> and baby-killers would have rolled over and given Palestinians a
> >> state? LMAO!
> >
> > They were given a State, 60 years ago, idiot, but they decided they
> > wanted it all and lost.
>
> "They, they." Nice bit of collectivism there.
>
The fear in Israel today is not unlike what goes on elsewhere.
Israel is a "western" society, hence the birth rate is low.
The birth rates of the Orthodox Jews and their traditional ways (not unlike
fundamentalist Islam) are gaining.
Otherwise, fundamentalism is gaining in Israel in the Jewish sense.
It worrys American governments.
All fundamentalism is bad. That's my view.
Keon
Like I always said before.
"White Supremos should watch NHL Ice Hockey"
Over 700 elite players, 6 of whom are black, 3 of whom are Inuit and 2 who
are Jewish!
The rest? White Christians who speak various languages!
It's a hard core skin head's delight!
What did that American broadcaster say about the Winter Olympic games in Salt
Lake City? (Bryant Gumbel)
"Finally, tonight, the Winter Games. Count me among those who don?t like them
and won?t watch them ... Because they?re so trying, maybe over the next three
weeks we should all try too. Like, try not to be incredulous when someone
attempts to link these games to those of the ancient Greeks who never heard
of skating or skiing. So try not to laugh when someone says these are the
world?s greatest athletes, despite a paucity of blacks that makes the Winter
Games look like a GOP convention. Try not to point out that something?s not
really a sport if a pseudo-athlete waits in what?s called a kiss-and-cry
area, while some panel of subjective judges decides who won ... So if only to
hasten the arrival of the day they?re done, when we can move on to March
Madness ? for God?s sake, let the games begin."
BDK
@rogers.com says...
> BDK <B...@kookmagnet.com> wrote:
> > Drugs are great, aren't they?
> >
> > So, what are you on now?
> >
> Yeah,
>
> Like I always said before.
>
> "White Supremos should watch NHL Ice Hockey"
>
> Over 700 elite players, 6 of whom are black, 3 of whom are Inuit and 2 who
> are Jewish!
>
> The rest? White Christians who speak various languages!
>
> It's a hard core skin head's delight!
I don't think most people even think at all about what race the players
are. I'm sure some do though.
>
> What did that American broadcaster say about the Winter Olympic games in Salt
> Lake City? (Bryant Gumbel)
>
> "Finally, tonight, the Winter Games. Count me among those who don?t like them
> and won?t watch them ... Because they?re so trying, maybe over the next three
> weeks we should all try too. Like, try not to be incredulous when someone
> attempts to link these games to those of the ancient Greeks who never heard
> of skating or skiing. So try not to laugh when someone says these are the
> world?s greatest athletes, despite a paucity of blacks that makes the Winter
> Games look like a GOP convention. Try not to point out that something?s not
> really a sport if a pseudo-athlete waits in what?s called a kiss-and-cry
> area, while some panel of subjective judges decides who won ... So if only to
> hasten the arrival of the day they?re done, when we can move on to March
> Madness ? for God?s sake, let the games begin."
>
While I share Bryant's opinion on cheese, sports in general bore the
crap out of me. If I had to pick a ball type sport to watch, it would be
baseball, about as integrated as it gets, and hockey is fun to watch for
the fights, the rest bores me, especially skating and skiing.
Anarchore
What a twisted specimen you are. Of course you got the direction from
that Mossad/CIA asset "Bin Laden", that criticising Israel means you
are on the same team as "Bin Laden", because "Bin Laden" says that
Israel is bad.
So I assume you would be against Sunni radicals taking over Parliament?
So why are you OK with another band of secular-religious race-based
zealots taking over Canada's institutions and government? This is what
revolutions are made of, and quislings will not fare well when the war
crimes trials and expulsions of Zionists begin.
The man himself
Really!
How would you know?
Argue my facts or don't bother saying anything. Ad hominems and non-
cognitive denials are the last refuges of the zionist scoundrel.
Anarchore
Hi Greg, we are honoured! Don't mind Mr Sdgreen, he is a silly man and
the above is his response to just about everything!
Check out my blog, I'll be adding your link soon...
http://zionofascism.wordpress.com/
BDK
dnSI95qYm763Vn...@posted.uniservecommunications>, e...@t.me
says...
> >>Column > Consumed America. The documentary evidence
> >>
> >> ==============================
> >>
> >> Hardly balanced material. Felton's writing edges on hard core
> >>radical Islamic material close to that of Bin Laden. He hates
> >>everything except the Islamic warmongering.
> >>
> >> ==
> >
> >Really!
> >
> >How would you know?
> >Argue my facts or don't bother saying anything. Ad hominems and non-
> >cognitive denials are the last refuges of the zionist scoundrel.
>
> Hi Greg, we are honoured! Don't mind Mr Sdgreen, he is a silly man and
> the above is his response to just about everything!
>
> Check out my blog, I'll be adding your link soon...
> http://zionofascism.wordpress.com/
>
LOL, you need a new hobby, and a life.
Being a lunatic moronic paranoid jew hater is no way to go through
life..
BDK
@gmail.com says...
> BDK <B...@kookmagnet.com> wrote:
> > > Check out my blog, I'll be adding your link soon...
> > > http://zionofascism.wordpress.com/
> > >
> >
> > LOL, you need a new hobby, and a life.
> >
> > Being a lunatic moronic paranoid jew hater is no way to go through
> > life..
> >
I do love reading the kookspew, doesn't matter who it's from. If it's
kookery, it's worth a read.
>
>
> And some of them keep bellyaching about how the Jews control the Internet as
> well!
In their minds, everything bad is somehow done by jews. Everything.
>
> It's all a big plot!
The biggest.
>
>
> Marshall McLuhan underestimated the anonymous wackjob factor when he
> fanatised about the global village of communication.
Yep, just think if you would explain what SPAM is to him. Then after
that, the 911 whackos, and on and on to the full rainbow of kookdumb.
BDK
> > Newsgroups: can.politics, alt.conspiracy, alt.anarchism, mtl.general
>
> Man! That's profound!
>
> :)
It's a gift. That's why I'm a kook magnet!
BDK
> Herbert Marshall McLuhan's lectures.
Too bad.
>
> If you saw him on the CBC, he was one of the true eccentrics. Somewhat of a
> kook as well! In the days when Glenn Gould was a real eccentric!
There's eccentric kooks and just whacked out kooks, like most of the 911
type..
BDK
> backwards and digging Satan or something. I duuno.
>
>
Problem was, the net had given the whackaloons a way to broadcast their
crazy chemtrail, 911, anti freemason, 911, morgellon's, mind control,
jews are_______ (Fill in the blank),remote viewing, Venus has life ,
Hillary/Bush/Kissinger is the antichrist delusions, and 911 insanity,
practically for free, and pretty much totally uncensored, around the
world. So instead of being the raving maniac on the streetcorner, they
have websites, more correctly kooksites, and forums, and usenet, of
course, to rave on. They can do it silently, and not draw any attention
to themselves, unless they want to.
That's a curse, and a blessing to us, as it makes it simple to see the
entire rainbow of kookdumb.
I love reading the shit though.
Government Shill #2
>Before 911, the wack jobs had another cause. Like playing Led Zep albums
>backwards and digging Satan or something. I duuno.
Before 911 there were "chemtrails", Bill Clinton, TWA 800, JFK...
Shill #2
--
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
theobviousgcashman