Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

prj-digest V1 #189

1 view

Skip to first unread message

Lloyd Miller

unread,

Jun 20, 1999, 3:00:00 AM6/20/99

prj-digest Wednesday, 16 June 1999 Volume 01 : Number
189

<< END

----------------------------------------------------------------------

From: bate...@pacbell.net
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 23:58:15 -0700
Subject: Re: [prj] "Hitlerism" = Western Civilization?

Free Rare/Out-of-Print Book Searches - Ruling Class/Conspiracy Experts:
E-Mail: ra...@a-albionic.com
****************************************************************************
*** << END
Damian B. Cooper wrote:
>
> Free Rare/Out-of-Print Book Searches - Ruling Class/Conspiracy Experts:
E-Mail: ra...@a-albionic.com
*********************************************************
> Here is an analysis that sheds some interesting insights into
> the attacks on Western Civilization occurring under the
> guise of "Political Correctness".
>
> "Political Correctness" really IS nothing more or less than
> a covert attack on Western Civilization.
>
> Hitler is bad
> Western Civilization is Hitlerism
> Ergo: Western Civilization is bad
>
> DBC
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ---------------------------
> Reviewed by Mark Weber
>
> Hitler as 'Enlightenment Intellectual': The Enduring Allure of Hitlerism
>
> A specter is haunting the world -- the specter of Hitlerism. That, in
> short, is the stern warning of this provocative book, written by an
> Assistant Professor of History at Ball State University (Indiana), and
> published by Praeger, a leading US academic publisher.
>
> In spite of decades of vehement vilification, says author Lawrence Birken,
> Hitler's views have enduring and dangerous appeal -- not because they are
> bizarre and alien, but precisely because they are rational and well
> grounded in Western thought. In particular, Birken stresses, Hitlerism is
> firmly rooted in the rationalist and scientific outlook of the
18th-century
> European Enlightenment. This is not meant as a compliment, however; the
> author is hostile to the West and its traditions. Rejecting the American
> and Western historical legacy, Prof. Birken openly calls for a new,
> racially homogenized America.
>
> For more than half a century, Hitler and his views have been ceaselessly
> demonized in motion pictures, on television and in the print media. And
> yet, according to Birken, the appeal of Hitlerism remains so potent that
it
> threatens the ideal of a racially "redefined" America of "higher unity."
As
> traditional standards and long-established cultural, racial and religious
> values come under ever greater attack, and as this country's racial and
> cultural crisis becomes ever more acute, Birken fears that those who are
> unwilling to accept the "redefined" society that is developing in America
> and Europe will turn in ever greater numbers to Hitler's alternative
vision
> of society. Hitlerism, Birken says, will loom ever larger as a dangerously
> seductive "siren song."
>
> The author has no doubt made a sincere effort to provide an informed and
> objective look at Hitler and his views. But even if we overlook the
> numerous misspellings of proper names and titles, and the often polemical
> prose style, this is a badly flawed work. Birken's understanding of what
> Hitler really thought and believed is both limited and skewed.
>
> This is due in large part to the author's exclusive reliance on English
> translations of Hitler's writings and speeches (apparently he cannot read
> German), and a naive trust in unreliable secondary studies. These include
> Robert Waite's The Psychopathic God: Adolf Hitler (1977), a
> sensationalistic psychodramatization, and Hermann Rauschning's Revolution
> of Nihilism (1939), a thoroughly discredited diatribe. (See "Rauschning's
> Phony `Converstions With Hitler': An Update," Winter 1985 Journal, pp.
> 499-500.)
>
> Birken also quotes repeatedly from The Testament of Adolf Hitler: The
> Hitler-Bormann Documents, supposedly a transcript of "table talk" remarks
> made by Hitler in February and April 1945. These "documents" are fake,
says
> British historian David Irving, who reports that the late Swiss banker
> Francois Genoud admitted to him that he was the author.
>
> 'A Genuine Intellectual'
>
> Reflecting the ideological perspective that prevails in the Western world
> today, scholars of Hitler and Third Reich Germany have tended to dismiss
> the German leader's intellectual outlook as simplistic and crude -- or
even
> crazy. Many play down or simply deny Hitler's place in Western culture "as
> a means of sanitizing that culture," says Birken. "But if we are to read
> Hitler neither to condemn nor to praise but merely to understand, then we
> come away with a very different conclusion about his place in European
> history."
>
> Scholars and others have made a major mistake in failing to take Hitler
> seriously as a thinker, argues Birken, who believes that the German
> political leader "must be regarded as a genuine intellectual" on a par
with
> Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud. Birken's assessment is not as startling as
> many might believe. As he notes, as early as 1953, British historian Hugh
> R. Trevor-Roper "evoked the image of Hitler as a kind of synthesis of
> Spengler and Napoleon, noting that of all world conquerors the German
> leader had been the most `philosophical'..." More recently, German
> historian Rainer Zitelmann established in a study of impressive
scholarship
> that Hitler's outlook was rational, self-consistent and "modern." (R.
> Zitelmann, Hitler: Selbtsverstondnis eines Revolutionors [second edition,
> 1989].)
>
> Moreover, Hitler's outlook was very much a part of the Western
intellectual
> tradition. In his "combination of an almost religious faith with a
> revolutionary secularism," writes Birken, "Hitler represented the
> continuation of an essentially Enlightenment style of thought... Nazism,
> and especially Hitler's exposition of it, represented an attenuated and
> popularized form of the Enlightenment style of thought."
>
> Hitler had a gift for presenting his message in an attractive, accessible
> form. Writes Birken:
>
> The most attractive feature of Hitler's ideology was thus its optimism. It
> was not merely his mood but his message that carried an infectious
> excitement. He was a secular messiah proclaiming a Germanic version of the
> "good news." The possibility of class reconciliation, the plans for a
> national revival, the identification of a universal enemy whose
elimination
> would usher in the millennium, all stirred his audiences to the very
> depths. Hitler spoke the language of the Enlightenment] philosophes, a
> language that had almost passed out of existence in the rarefied strata of
> the grand intelligentsia.
>
> However, placing Hitler and Hitlerism in the intellectual tradition of the
> West, Birken continues, "should do less to raise our opinion" of
Hitlerism,
> than to "lower our opinion" of "the intellectual history of the West."
>
> Economic Views
>
> Hitler's economic worldview, writes Birken, was likewise rational,
> self-consistent, progressive, and entirely in keeping with Western
> tradition. "Hitler's economic ideas were also permeated by Enlightenment
> notions of progress," and were "closer to Ricardo and Marx than to
> Machiavelli or Keynes." Birken adds:
>
> "A careful reading of his speeches and writings suggests that he was
> neither a mercantilist nor a Keynesian, neither a medievalist nor a
> marginalist. Rather... his economic ideas fit all too well into the
> classical-physiocratic style of thought."
>
> Hitler believed that social and national considerations, not economic
ones,
> should be paramount in society. The economic and political system must
> serve the nation, not the other way around. Thus, Birken points out, while
> "political economy played an important role in his thinking," Hitler did
> not restore the primacy of the state after all but, quite the contrary,
> subordinated the state itself to a dynamic of aggressive technological and
> cultural expansion. In doing this, Hitler also asserted himself against
the
> last remnants of aristocratic civility at the same time that he opposed
the
> emerging relativism of consumer culture.
>
> As Birken explains, Hitler believed that "all growth could be traced to
> individual effort -- but only at the service of the common good. He thus
> tempered what might be taken as a `libertarian' definition of
inventiveness
> with a somber collectivism." Believing that socially useful creativity was
> "the product of individual geniuses of high personality value," Hitler
> supported equal social opportunity for all, and opposed legal and social
> barriers to individual economic achievement and success. Governmental and
> social policies, he believed, should encourage merit-based social
mobility.
>
> Hitler was critical of both capitalism and Marxism -- the first because it
> was "insufficiently democratic," and the latter because it was "too
> democratic" or "leveling." While supporting economic growth across
national
> boundaries, "Hitler also took what he considered to be a conservative
stand
> against the coming hyper-commercialism of an emerging global economy."
>
> Views on Race and Religion
>
> Although he is endlessly castigated as "the most notorious racist of the
> twentieth century," Hitler's racial views were actually quite in harmony
> with mainstream 19th- and early 20th-century European thinking. "It should
> be obvious," writes Birken, "that Hitler possessed a `classical' theory of
> race which dovetailed nicely with his classical notions of political
> economy."
>
> Far from being aberrant or bizarre, his views on race were consistent with
> those of most prominent Westerners in the decades before the Second World
> War. And while Birken does not specifically mention it, Hitler's racial
> views were comparable to those of Thomas Jefferson, Theodore Roosevelt,
> Woodrow Wilson and Winston Churchill.
>
> Contrary to popular belief, Hitler never supported notions of breeding a
> homogenous blond "hyper-Aryan" race. Accepting the reality that the German
> population consisted of several distinct sub-racial groups, he stressed
the
> German people's national and social unity. A certain degree of racial
> variety was desirable, he thought, and too much racial blending or
> homogeneity could be harmful because it would homogenize and thus
eliminate
> superior as well as inferior genetic traits.
>
> Hitler believed that "both conservative prudery and radical eroticism"
> harmed society, and he opposed birth control because it tended to lower
the
> genetic quality of the society that practices it.
>
> While he was critical of Christianity, Hitler was no atheist. "The
religion
> of Hitlerism was thus essentially a kind of deism," concludes Birken. Like
> Thomas Jefferson and other prominent early American leaders, Hitler
equated
> God with "the dominion of natural laws throughout the whole universe."
> Thus, "for Hitler, national socialism was natural socialism."
>
> Attitude Toward Jews
>
> It is "of course, a great mistake to see anti-Semitism as a rejection of
> Enlightenment values," writes Birken. "On the contrary, the Enlightenment
> simply secularized rather than destroyed traditional Judeophobia." (No
> Western thinker was more outspokenly anti-Jewish than Voltaire, the great
> French philosophe, who regarded the Jews as "enemies of mankind.") The
> Enlightenment concept of social "fraternity," Birken writes, demands
social
> solidarity, which implies that Jews, as an alien and self-absorbed people,
> cannot fit in.
>
> Hitler's hostile attitude toward Jews, Birken writes, was neither
> irrational nor aberrant. He saw "Jews as the personification of a great
> lie": that is, while they pretended to be merely a religious community, in
> fact they constituted a self-selected national-ethnic group with
> international ambitions. Because he regarded the Jews as the enemies of
all
> peoples, Hitler held that combatting Jewish power and influence should be
> the common duty of all nations -- a view that Birken calls an expression
of
> "Germanic universalism."
>
> The United States
>
> Hitler's attitude toward the United States was mixed. He saw much to
admire
> in 18th- and 19th-century America, and as Birken notes, he praised this
> country's pre-1940s pro-White racial policies, its restrictions on
> non-White immigration, and its pioneering adoption of eugenics measures.
>
> But Hitler also saw ominous trends during the 1920s and 1930s. Echoing the
> views of American industrialist Henry Ford, he was dismayed by the
> spectacular growth of Jewish power and cultural influence, and regarded
> Franklin Roosevelt's "New Deal" administration as a virtual revolution in
> American life, through which Jews largely usurped the country's
traditional
> ruling class.
>
> A Persistent Allure
>
> The defeat of Germany in 1945, Birken rightly notes, "clearly marked a
> watershed" in world history, and especially for the West:
>
> In a real sense, Hitler's defeat implicitly became the defeat of the
> European nation-state and the Enlightenment values that underpinned it.
> Germany's heirs, the United States and the Soviet Union, were both
> fundamentally transnational, multiracial empires whose territories were
> seemingly unlimited.
>
> As a result, for half a century we have been living in what Birken calls a
> "consumer capitalist" world in which "the hierarchical order of sex and
> race which had originally sustained bourgeois nationalism has been
> disintegrating" and in which "the increasing relativization of values is
> encouraged by the ever greater globalization of the economy and consequent
> emergence of a multinational business elite."
>
> This new world order is less durable than it might appear, says Birken.
The
> recent collapse of the multi-ethnic, multi-racial Soviet Union, he warns,
> portends similar problems for the American empire. Even a mere contraction
> of the economy could threaten "to dissolve the United States into several
> races." In Birken's view, racial nationalism threatens "the continued
> existence of the United States." He warns:
>
> What Hitler said in the thirties is thus what our racial nationalists are
> saying today: namely, that a genuinely inclusive multiracial nation
> violates the natural order of things. The United States must either be a
> white-dominated state or a collection of breakaway republics made up of
> this or that group.
>
> In short: if Hitler was right, America is an increasingly unnatural and
> artificial construct that does not deserve to survive, and will not
survive.
>
> Birken fears that Hitlerism will become ever more attractive to those who
> reject today's supra-national "consumer capitalism," and who resist the
> rapidly emerging "genuinely inclusive multiracial" order. This alternative
> vision has appeal beyond America and Europe, Birken believes. As he notes,
> Hitler's fight against the British empire -- a war he actually never
sought
> nor wanted -- "won him [Hitler] the admiration of colonial peoples from
> Ireland to India ..."
>
> A New 'Cosmic' Nation
>
> Birken concludes his book with a fervent call for "the gradual formation
of
> an American race as a higher synthesis. Then the Americans will truly
> constitute a universal or `cosmic' people." In Birken's view, the "race
> myth" and Hitlerism "will continue to tempt us" unless Americans "can be
> given a genuine metaphysical foundation." This "metaphysical foundation"
> must be to "uncreate race" through massive racial mixing. Therefore,
Birken
> writes, "we should not be afraid of that dirty little word,
> `miscegenation'." (Consistent with this vision, President Bill Clinton, in
> his much-discussed June 14, 1997, speech in San Diego on race relations,
> openly proclaimed the goal of making America "the world's first truly
> multiracial democracy.")
>
> Given the reluctance of many Americans, particularly conservative Whites,
> to warmly embrace this new "universal" nation, Birken says "we must have
an
> education system that is able to instill this redefinition of American
> culture."
>
> "Before we try uniting the world," Birken concludes, "let us try uniting
> ourselves. Until we do so, the siren song of Hitlerism will call to us."
>
> Stark Alternatives
>
> To anyone who views the past with an open mind, history demonstrates the
> utterly fantastic nature of the goal laid out by Prof. Birken (and
> President Clinton) -- a vision no less utopian than Marxian Communism. In
> any case, to meld the American population into a "universal"
> racial-cultural entity would require government repression on a scale
> unimaginable today.
>
> Few Americans today are able or willing to fully grasp the enormous
> implications of the radical program that intellectuals such as Birken (and
> political leaders such as Clinton) are spelling out for our future. But
> once they do (and as Prof. Birken fears) many will likely turn to
Hitlerism
> as an alternative to the official prevailing ideology. The decades-long
> campaign of vilification of Hitler and Third Reich Germany may actually
> contribute to this by convincing millions of Americans that Hitlerism is
> the antithesis of the Establishment's ideology, and thus the only real
> alternative.
>
> In spite of its defects, Hitler as Philosophe effectively dispels some
> widely-held misconceptions about Hitler and Hitlerism, acknowledges the
> critical importance of the race issue, and boldly spells out stark
> alternatives for the future of America and Europe. For this the author
> deserves credit.
>
> Hitler as Philosophe: Remnants of the Enlightenment in National Socialism,
> by Lawrence Birken. Westport, Conn.: Praeger, 1995. Hardcover.
>
> 120 pages.
> Reference notes. Bibliography. Index. $45.00.
>
>
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><><
> A Growing Selection of A-albionic's Books Can Be Browsed and
Purchased Convenient

BF>The equation of Hitler with Old Order mysticism has been simplistic.
He even adopted some of the symbolism of the very
Masonic-Illuminist-modernist forces he supposedly opposed. He rejected
the traditional power structures, aristocratic-old order and modernist
alike, and sought his own redefinition of Western culture.
He did uphold some aspects of Western civilization as defined by
the Enlightenment, including the dream of a One World Government under an
"illuminated" elite, which paradoxically emerged alongside nationalism as
part of the "resurrected phoenix" from the ashes of the old order. His
main beef with the Enlightenment was its egalitarianism, and its lack of
a racist foundation. Even there, however, there were Germanic occult and
racist forces within the various Enlightenment schools (including
Illuminism), and it makes the whole issue of whether Hitler was opposed
to western civilization or whether he was an upholder of its darkest
secrets an interesting question.
No firm answers here, only disturbing questions.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><><
> A Growing Selection of A-albionic's Books Can Be Browsed and Purchased
Conveniently in the Shopping Cart at http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html <<
END

------------------------------

From: bate...@pacbell.net
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 00:32:23 -0700
Subject: [prj] Re: [infonet-list] Pro-Life Infonet 6/16/99

Free Rare/Out-of-Print Book Searches - Ruling Class/Conspiracy Experts:
E-Mail: ra...@a-albionic.com
****************************************************************************
*** << END
BF>China is blamed by many in the Establishment for its trade policies,
treatment of dissidents, and, of course, the spying business. I'm not
saying that any of this is wrong, but how many have focused on an area
where NWO and Chinese government thinking HAVE intersected and that is
the population/abortion issue?
China has a repressive attitude towards women and their bodies.
Forced abortions in China are almost never discussed in the foreign media
in the same way that other human rights issues are. I think that this is
due to the fact that there is fundamental agreement behind much of the
appearant conflict between the "West" and China. There has been racist
sterilization here in America, and the roots of it remain.
There is more to be said, perhaps, but I will let it go for now.
MHO.

ert...@prolifeinfo.org wrote:
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> Pressure Building for Visa for Chinese Woman Forcibly Aborted
> Abortion-breast cancer link debated in Congress
> New Pro-Abortion Lobbying Campaign Will fight for UN Dues
> New Jersey: Pro-Abortion Groups Caught Off Guard on Whitman and Parental
> Notification
> Vote in an Online Poll Regarding Peter Singer
>
> --------------------
> From: Steven Ertelt <ert...@prolifeinfo.org>
> Reply-To: Steven Ertelt <ert...@prolifeinfo.org>
> To: The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet...@prolifeinfo.org>
> Subject: [infonet-list] Pressure Building for Visa for Chinese Woman
> Forcibly Aborted
>
> Pressure Building for Visa for Chinese Woman Forcibly Aborted
>
> Australia -- Pressure is building in Australia for the country to take
> back a Chinese
> woman forced to have an abortion after being deported while pregnant.
>
> Pro-life Senator Brian Harradine and refugee support groups have appealed
> directly to Prime Minister John Howard to allow Zhu Qingping to return.
>
> Marion Le, president of the Independent Council for Refugee Advocacy, said
> Senator Harradine, who first publicised Ms Zhu's plight, made several
> phone calls to Mr Howard over the weekend.
>
> "There's been some discussion as to whether or not the Prime Minister is
> going to intervene and order Immigration Minister Philip Ruddock to issue
> a visa," Ms Le said.
>
> Mr Howard is thought to be sympathetic towards Ms Zhu, an illegal
> immigrant deported in 1997. Last week, he said an abortion carried out on
> an eight-month pregnant woman "amounted to murder in the eyes of many
> Australians".
>
> Ms Le said Ms Zhu faced the prospect of being returned to her home town of
> Beihai, in Guangxi province, and forcibly sterilised for breaching family
> planning laws regarding the one-child policy.
>
> Senator Harradine refused to comment on his talks with Mr Howard,
> suggesting Ms Zhu's life was in danger.
>
> A spokeswoman for Mr Ruddock confirmed a visa application from Ms Zhu was
> received on Friday. She said it would have to be assessed. "We're taking
> legal advice because her application doesn't fall within the usual
> boundaries."
>
> --
> The Pro-Life Infonet is a daily compilation of pro-life news and
> information. To subscribe, send the message "subscribe" to:
> infonet- req...@prolifeinfo.org. Infonet is sponsored by Women and
> Children First (http://www.prolifeinfo.org/wcf). For more pro-life info
> visit http://www.prolifeinfo.org and for questions or additional
> information email ert...@prolifeinfo.org
>
> --------------------
> From: Steven Ertelt <ert...@prolifeinfo.org>
> Reply-To: Steven Ertelt <ert...@prolifeinfo.org>
> To: The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet...@prolifeinfo.org>
> Subject: [infonet-list] Abortion-breast cancer link debated in Congress
>
> Abortion-breast cancer link debated in Congress
> Source: Dr. Joel Brind Press Release
>
> Washington -- On June 8, a debate on the link between abortion and breast
> cancer
> erupted during the floor debate on the Coburn Amendment to the Agriculture
> Appropriations Act in the US House of Representatives. Dr. Coburn's
> Amendment--which ultimately passed by a vote of 217-214--prohibits the
> Food and Drug Administration from using federal funds to test or approve
> drugs such as RU-486 for the purpose of inducing abortion.
>
> Rep. Joe Pitts (R,PA) said "Scientific studies have shown a link between
> abortion and breast cancer. Unfortunately, many who commit abortions do
> not want to let women know about that risk ... How can we in good
> concsience approve new forms of abortion before we study the breast cancer
> and abortion link further and let women know of the risk? This kind of
> information should be held in hearings before the committee."
>
> Rep. DeLauro (D,CT) retorted that "the editor of the Journal of the
> National Cancer Institute said that there is insufficient evidence that
> exists to link induced abortion and breast cancer."
>
> Rep. Sue Myrick (R,NC) disagreed: "Ten out of 11 studies on American women
> report an increased risk of breast cancer after having an induced
> abortion, particularly among women with a history of breast cancer in
> their families."
>
> Rep. Nita Lowey countered, citing the NY Times as her authority for saying
> "no evidence exists to link induced abortion and breast cancer".
>
> Rep. Chris Smith (R,NJ) replied "The 'denial' people remind me of the
> Tobacco Institute denials who year after year said there is no connection
> between smoking and lung cancer."
>
> Smith then proceeded to cite hard data from the published research of
> 'pro-choice', NCI-funded scientist Janet Daling:
>
> "...there is an increase in the aggregate of all women of about 50% in the
> propensity to get breast cancer....She also found that if a woman aborts
> her first baby that number shoots up to 150%. Shame on those who say there
> is no linkage. They are
> misleading women. They are misleading women. And putting women at risk.
> Dr. Daling also found that where there is a history of breast cancer in
> that family, the vote (risk increase) skyrockets to 270% when abortion is
> involved."
>
> Dr. Coburn himself next joined the fray, in response to Rep. Lowey's
> citation of a National Cancer Institute statement which claimed "no
> evidence of a direct relationship between breast cancer and either induced
> or spontaneous abortion."
>
> Coburn, invoking his own training in science and professional expertise as
> an obstetrician/gynecologist, said "by combining that data, a normal
> response to a wrong and incomplete reproductive event (spontaneous
> abortion, or miscarriage) to the termination of a normal event (induced
> abortion), we do not have good data. They know that. That is why they put
> that material in there."
>
> Another physician-Congressman, Dave Weldon (R, FL) had the last word on
> the abortion-breast cancer link:
>
> "My colleagues, I have reviewed the studies on this issue and the studies
> are very, very compelling that there really is a link (between abortion
> and breast cancer). The statement released by the NCI (National Cancer
> Institute), I believe, is a very disingenuous statement. It really
> sincerely ignores the facts on this issue."
>
> For more information on the Abortion-breast cancer link, log on to
> http://www.abortioncancer.com
>
> --
> The Pro-Life Infonet is a daily compilation of pro-life news and
> information. To subscribe, send the message "subscribe" to:
> infonet- req...@prolifeinfo.org. Infonet is sponsored by Women and
> Children First (http://www.prolifeinfo.org/wcf). For more pro-life info
> visit http://www.prolifeinfo.org and for questions or additional
> information email ert...@prolifeinfo.org
>
> --------------------
> From: Steven Ertelt <ert...@prolifeinfo.org>
> Reply-To: Steven Ertelt <ert...@prolifeinfo.org>
> To: The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet...@prolifeinfo.org>
> Subject: [infonet-list] New Pro-Abortion Lobbying Campaign Will fight for
> UN Dues
>
> New Pro-Abortion Lobbying Campaign Will fight for UN Dues
>
> Washington -- A "new drive" is under way by abortion advocates to
> persuade Congress to authorize payment of $1 billion in debt to the United
> Nations without attaching a pro-life policy rider that has stymied the
> bill for the past two years, the Washington Post reported Sunday.
>
> The Better World Campaign, a Washington lobbying organization funded by
> pro-abortion media mogul Ted Turner, has enlisted the support of former
> Republican National Committee Chair Haley Barbour to lobby Congress to
> release the money without adding the pro-life language.
>
> Last year's effort to pass a similar bill was fortunately stymied by a
> policy rider prohibiting organizations that receive federal funds from
> promoting or performing abortions in foreign countries, and a 1997 bill
> prompted a presidential veto.
>
> Pro-life Rep. Chris Smith (R-NJ), who sponsored the previous rider, has
> indicated his desire to attach the language once more and may do so during
> a House-Senate conference committee on the legislation.
>
> Pro-abortion lobbyists and congressional staffers, however, say they will
> seek to attempt to stop Smith from doing so.
>
> According to the Post, the appropriations must be released by Sept. 30,
> 2000, after which time the U.N. funding request "would have to compete
> with other budgetary items, making it vulnerable to being raided for other
> purposes." The United Nations estimates the debt at about $1.5 billion,
> but the United States only acknowledges about $1 billion (Lippman,
> Washington Post, 6/13).
>
> --
> Pro-life books on abortion and euthanasia
> http://www.roevwade.org/books.html
>
> --------------------
> From: Steven Ertelt <ert...@prolifeinfo.org>
> Reply-To: Steven Ertelt <ert...@prolifeinfo.org>
> To: The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet...@prolifeinfo.org>
> Subject: [infonet-list] New Jersey: Pro-Abortion Groups Caught Off Guard
> on Whitman and Parental
> Notification
>
> New Jersey: Pro-Abortion Groups Caught Off Guard on Whitman and Parental
> Notification
>
> Trenton -- New Jersey abortion advocates, "blindsided" by pro-abortion
> Gov. Christine Todd Whitman's (R) unexpected support for a parental
> notification bill, rallied at the state House yesterday, but conceded they
> have little chance of blocking passage of the pro-life measure that
> cleared a state Senate committee and is now headed to the full Senate,
> where it is expected to pass.
>
> New Jersey NOW President Elizabeth Volz said of the bill, which was passed
> 5-2 by the state Senate Health Committee, "Obviously, if we had known the
> governor's position sooner, we would have mobilized sooner." The New York
> Times reports that abortion supporters said their only hope is to mount a
> court challenge questioning the measure's constitutionality, as they
> continue to do in states across the country.
>
> Some pro-life state legislators and even prominent pro-abortion leaders
> charge that the protests were too little and too late, indicative of
> complacency in a state known for supporting abortion more often than not.
>
> Pro-abortion assemblyman Neil Cohen (D), noting that pro-abortion forces
> mounted zero opposition to the bill, said, "They have unfortunately,
> distressingly, become an invisible voice for women's reproductive rights.
> They've been seduced into believing that the governor would protect them,
> so they haven't been out there organizing or raising money or mobilizing
> people on the grass-roots level. And in the Legislature they aren't active
> enough to be perceived as a threat. Legislators don't feel there's a price
> to pay for infringing on a woman's rights, and that's disturbing."
>
> State abortion advocates claim that Whitman "personally assured them that
> she opposed parental notification," and said her "about-face on the issue
> was so startling that when she announced her support for the bill ... they
> waited a few days before criticizing her too harshly, hoping that she
> would reconsider."
>
> At the rally yesterday -- which, in a "telling sign of the protesters'
> estrangement from the political process" featured only one legislator --
> "demonstrators wrote notes to Gov. Whitman on rubber sandals, a gesture
> which Ms. Volz said was meant to symbolize 'her flip-flop on the issue'"
> (Kocieniewski, New York Times, 6/15).
>
> --
> Support the Pro-Life Infonet with your financial donation to: Women and
> Children First, P.O. Box 4433, Helena, MT 59604-4433.
>
> --------------------
> From: Steven Ertelt <ert...@prolifeinfo.org>
> Reply-To: Steven Ertelt <ert...@prolifeinfo.org>
> To: The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet...@prolifeinfo.org>
> Subject: [infonet-list] Vote in an Online Poll Regarding Peter Singer
>
> Vote in an Online Poll Regarding Peter Singer
> From: Marie Tasy <mt...@njrtl.org>
>
> Channel 9 (UPN 9) aired a story last night they taped over a month ago
> about Professor Peter Singer, who believes it is morally okay for parents
> to kill a disabled infant even after it has been born. Singer has been
> appointed Chair of the Ira W DeCamp Center for Human Values at Princeton
> University. His appointment is expected to commence on July 1 of this
> year.
>
> Channel 9 News is conducting a poll on Professor Peter Singer's views.
> Please register your vote at www.upn9.com
>
> --
> The Pro-Life Infonet is a daily compilation of pro-life news and
> information. To subscribe, send the message "subscribe" to:
> infonet...@prolifeinfo.org. Infonet is sponsored by Women and
> Children First (http://www.prolifeinfo.org/wcf). For more pro-life info
> visit http://www.prolifeinfo.org and for questions or additional
> information email ert...@prolifeinfo.org
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><><
> A Growing Selection of A-albionic's Books Can Be Browsed and Purchased
Conveniently in the Shopping Cart at http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html <<
END

------------------------------

From: good...@northshore.net
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 07:35:25 -0700
Subject: [prj] Humanist Movement

Free Rare/Out-of-Print Book Searches - Ruling Class/Conspiracy Experts:
E-Mail: ra...@a-albionic.com
****************************************************************************
*** << END
Anyone know about the Humanist movement, especially in regards to a guy
named Silo in South America, who heads up a large group? The literature
sounds very One World. Since it is so anti-religion, can it be assumed it
is Judeo-Masonic rather than Vatican inspired?

Mark
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><><
> A Growing Selection of A-albionic's Books Can Be Browsed and Purchased
Conveniently in the Shopping Cart at http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html <<
END

------------------------------

From: Christopher Herman <christopher...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 09:42:46 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [prj] Regarding Anarchism

Free Rare/Out-of-Print Book Searches - Ruling Class/Conspiracy Experts:
E-Mail: ra...@a-albionic.com
****************************************************************************
*** << END

- --- bate...@pacbell.net wrote:

> BF>A:I never said I supported anarchism.

CH: I do recall you saying at one time last year on prj
list that you were an anarcho-Federalist...
===
Christopher Herman
Check out my VERY Amateurish Web Page
http://www.jpostmail.com/jpost/users/Christopher1
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><><
> A Growing Selection of A-albionic's Books Can Be Browsed and Purchased
Conveniently in the Shopping Cart at http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html <<
END

------------------------------

From: "Peter L. Sroufe" <deep...@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 10:59:18 -0700
Subject: [prj] DA tries to stop ABC's TV appearance of Bob Enyart [leader of
ShadowGov]

Free Rare/Out-of-Print Book Searches - Ruling Class/Conspiracy Experts:
E-Mail: ra...@a-albionic.com
****************************************************************************
*** << END

WEDNESDAY
JUNE 16
1999
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
- ----
DA tries to stop TV appearance
Talk show host Enyart's appearance
on ABC program in question

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
- ----

By Stephan Archer
Š 1999 WorldNetDaily.com

Bob Enyart, a long-time Denver talk show host and leader of ShadowGov, may
be prohibited from appearing on ABC's "Politically Incorrect" program Friday
if a motion requested by the Jefferson County district attorney's office in
Colorado and a probation official are granted by Jefferson County Court
Judge Charles Hoppin.
On May 26, the day after he got out of jail for a child abuse conviction
that resulted from him spanking his stepson, Enyart asked Intervention, a
private company that provides probation services to Jefferson County, for
permission to travel to Los Angeles for "Politically Incorrect." Upon his
request, Enyart was told that asking for permission to travel was normal
procedures, and he didn't have anything to worry about.

On June 9, however, Enyart was notified that Intervention had filed a motion
requesting Enyart be denied out-of-state permits until he has "proven a
pattern of compliance with probationary conditions, including treatment."
Although just notified last week about this motion, Intervention had
submitted the motion about two weeks prior.

Three days ago on June 13, the American Civil Liberties Union in Colorado
filed a motion on Enyart's behalf, and the district attorney's office filed
a counter-motion supporting Intervention's request. Because of these
motions, Judge Hoppin has ordered an emergency hearing to be held on the
case later today.

Although Enyart has often criticized the Colorado ACLU for its support of
those who sell child pornography, he said he is willing to take advantage of
the union's clout. He adds, however, the ACLU should take advantage of
ShadowGov's material, which speaks out against such things as child
pornography.

Intervention's motion states Enyart "has expressed his views of the criminal
justice process through the media" and if he gets the chance to speak on a
national program like "Politically Incorrect," the publicity might bring him
"support from a segment of the population." Intervention's motion also
expresses concern about Enyart talking publicly about his case since the
case involves a juvenile (his stepson).

"In other words, if I express on the air my support of traditional spanking,
they don't like the idea that the general public might agree with me and
encourage me to continue defending spanking," Enyart said. "They're trying
to cut me off from popular support for traditional Christian family values."

Besides prohibiting Enyart from traveling out of state and appearing on
"Politically Incorrect," Intervention is requesting other decisions in its
motion.

"Intervention ... respectfully requests that the court amend the probation
order to preclude Mr. Enyart from discussing this specific case, the
conditions imposed, or the supervision of this matter to or through the
media while on probation," states Intervention's motion.

Regardless of what the judge decides, Enyart said he will continue with his
plans.

"I will continue to speak regardless of what they order. They can't silence
me like I'm a political prisoner who's not allowed to speak about criminal
justice," said Enyart who believes a major reason for Intervention's motion
is his Christian beliefs.

"They're on a holy war against spanking, and Christians are the best
defenders of spanking. They're on a jihad," commented Enyart.

Although the ACLU couldn't be reached for comment on this case, Enyart said
the ACLU believes it is absurd for Intervention and the district attorney to
try to stop Enyart from going to the media and participating on "Politically
Incorrect." Enyart said the ACLU told him Colorado law is very specific in
that it only allows the judge to narrowly apply restrictions to his case.

Patrick Mulligan, an attorney who was hired by the ACLU to assist in
Enyart's case, said he doesn't understand why the district attorney's office
and probation officer at Intervention would try to prevent Enyart from
taking part in "Politically Incorrect" this Friday. It is because of the
unclear reason for the motion that Mulligan has decided to take on Enyart's
case.

"In all candor, it is not clear to me why they are trying to prevent him
from appearing on this television show," Mulligan said. "In opposition, we
have stated that we believe the position of the Intervention Department --
in attempting to restrict Enyart's freedom of speech, freedom of travel and
freedom of association -- is unconstitutional."

"It violates his protected First Amendment rights," Mulligan continued. "And
it is not reasonably related to his rehabilitation on probation. It is not
reasonably related to any sort of protection of the community."

Mulligan explained that although certain restrictions on a defendant are
appropriate and can be imposed, other restrictions and requirements are, or
can be, inappropriate if they unconstitutionally limit or infringe on one's
rights to free speech.

WorldNetDaily contacted Intervention for comments but was told that the only
information that could be given was information that could be obtained at
the courthouse. Thus, the statements from the motion were all that was
available from Intervention.

Enyart is best known for burning O.J. Simpson's memorabilia at the Los
Angeles courthouse in February while launching ShadowGov, a government
watchdog website. Enyart and ShadowGov are also known for their protest
campaign against Clinton and the alleged Broaddrick rape.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
- ----
Š 1999 WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
- ----
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/bluesky_exnews/19990616_xex_da_tries_to_.shtml

Bard
Visit me at:
The Center for Exposing Corruption in the Federal Government
http://www.xld.com/public/center/center.htm

Federal Government defined:
....a benefit/subsidy protection racket!

------------------------------

From: bate...@pacbell.net
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 11:50:49 -0700
Subject: Re: [prj] Regarding Anarchism

BF>Yes, I did. Let me explain it in context.
Bob Black writes of the vast contradictions within the anarchist
movement. He is, himself, an anarchist, who takes a very radical
anarchist line in which he rejects the hybrid anarchisms, such as
anarcho-syndicalism, anarcho-capitalism, and anarcho-pacifism. He uses
these various "anarcho-" hybridizations to prove a point to his readers
that anarchy must be taken pure.
I am something of a political agnostic. Therefore, I was being
flippant when I referred to myself as an "anarcho-Federalist", as though
Hamilton and John Adams could be reconciled with anarchist philosophy.
It was meant meant as a (half-)joking attempt to describe myself in
contradictory terms.
Actually, I do consider the philosophy of anarchism seriously.
There may have been some schools of Federalism which deviated from
statism considerably, rejected aristocratic rule, and eventually embraced
counter-majoritarian pacifist anarchism during their "radical moment" on
the abolition question. Some radical schools of Jeffersonian radicalism
joined in with them, and a semi-anarchist synthesis was born in the
Garrisonian movement.
I am a political agnostic, or one who does know what the ultimate
political solution is. I have considered philosophies as diverse as
Trotskyism, libertarianism, LaRouchianism, anarchism, liberalism,
Buchananism, and traditionalism. Today, I consider anarchism for its
consistency, but cannot go for what is unproven or Utopian. I think that
any true solution has to grow out of human voluntary exchange, and not an
attempt at coercion from any direction.
MHO.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><><
> A Growing Selection of A-albionic's Books Can Be Browsed and Purchased
Conveniently in the Shopping Cart at http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html <<
END

------------------------------

From: Christopher Herman <christopher...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 11:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: [prj] O.J.

Free Rare/Out-of-Print Book Searches - Ruling Class/Conspiracy Experts:
E-Mail: ra...@a-albionic.com
****************************************************************************
*** << END

Hey, I'm just curious...am I the only person on this list
who thinks O.J. is innocent?

===
Christopher Herman
Check out my improved Home Page-
http://www.jpostmail.com/jpost/users/Christopher1
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

------------------------------

From: Hugh Mathena <golfw...@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 12:02:24 PDT
Subject: Re: [prj] Regarding Anarchism

>From: bate...@pacbell.net
>To: p...@mail.msen.com
>Subject: Re: [prj] Regarding Anarchism
>Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 11:50:49 -0700
>
>Free Rare/Out-of-Print Book Searches - Ruling Class/Conspiracy Experts:
>E-Mail: ra...@a-albionic.com
>***************************************************************************
****
><< END
>Christopher Herman wrote:
> >
> > Free Rare/Out-of-Print Book Searches - Ruling Class/Conspiracy Experts:
>E-Mail: ra...@a-albionic.com
>*********************************************************
> >
> > --- bate...@pacbell.net wrote:
> >
> > > BF>A:I never said I supported anarchism.
> >
> > CH: I do recall you saying at one time last year on prj
> > list that you were an anarcho-Federalist...
> > ===
> > Christopher Herman
> > Check out my VERY Amateurish Web Page
> > http://www.jpostmail.com/jpost/users/Christopher1
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><>
<>
>A Growing Selection of A-albionic's Books Can Be Browsed and
>Purchased Convenient
>
>BF>Yes, I did. Let me explain it in context.
> Bob Black writes of the vast contradictions within the anarchist
>movement. He is, himself, an anarchist, who takes a very radical
>anarchist line in which he rejects the hybrid anarchisms, such as
>anarcho-syndicalism, anarcho-capitalism, and anarcho-pacifism. He uses
>these various "anarcho-" hybridizations to prove a point to his readers
>that anarchy must be taken pure.
> I am something of a political agnostic. Therefore, I was being
>flippant when I referred to myself as an "anarcho-Federalist", as though
>Hamilton and John Adams could be reconciled with anarchist philosophy.
>It was meant meant as a (half-)joking attempt to describe myself in
>contradictory terms.
> Actually, I do consider the philosophy of anarchism seriously.
>There may have been some schools of Federalism which deviated from
>statism considerably, rejected aristocratic rule, and eventually embraced
>counter-majoritarian pacifist anarchism during their "radical moment" on
>the abolition question. Some radical schools of Jeffersonian radicalism
>joined in with them, and a semi-anarchist synthesis was born in the
>Garrisonian movement.
> I am a political agnostic, or one who does know what the ultimate
>political solution is. I have considered philosophies as diverse as
>Trotskyism, libertarianism, LaRouchianism, anarchism, liberalism,
>Buchananism, and traditionalism. Today, I consider anarchism for its
>consistency, but cannot go for what is unproven or Utopian. I think that
>any true solution has to grow out of human voluntary exchange, and not an
>attempt at coercion from any direction.
> MHO.
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><>
<>
>A Growing Selection of A-albionic's Books Can Be Browsed and Purchased
>Conveniently in the Shopping Cart at http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html <<
> END
>

_______________________________________________________________
Get Free Email and Do More On The Web. Visit http://www.msn.com
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><><
> A Growing Selection of A-albionic's Books Can Be Browsed and Purchased
Conveniently in the Shopping Cart at http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html <<
END

------------------------------

From: bate...@pacbell.net
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 12:01:30 -0700
Subject: Re: [prj] FWD:WAGING DENUCLEARIZATION AND SOCIAL JUSTICE THROUGH
DEMOCRACY

> Any common man would say let's have peace forever. However, using
> nationalism and the codewords "human rights" we have international bodies
> determining who's sovereign and who's not. Once a group of nations ban
> together to wage war and economic destruction, they have an excuse to
ignore
> their citizens- Blame it on France or the UK or whoever.
>BF>Right.

> As long as world leadership is a selective and limited body, you're going
to
> have tyranny against a weaker foe. Big bullies vs little bullies. Parity
is
> no longer possible because the elites are grouping themselves into
> consolidation of worldwide leadership.
>BF>Certain ones are.

> The question is not who will win, but when?
>BF>I hope we have more latitude than that!
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><><
> A Growing Selection of A-albionic's Books Can Be Browsed and Purchased
Conveniently in the Shopping Cart at http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html <<
END

------------------------------

From: Hugh Mathena <golfw...@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 12:04:51 PDT
Subject: Re: [prj] O.J.

There are certainly better things to waste our time with than whether OJ
did/did not kill anyone- he's a burp or fart of history...

>From: Christopher Herman <christopher...@yahoo.com>
>To: p...@mail.msen.com
>Subject: [prj] O.J.
>Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 11:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Free Rare/Out-of-Print Book Searches - Ruling Class/Conspiracy Experts:
>E-Mail: ra...@a-albionic.com
>***************************************************************************
****
><< END
>
>Hey, I'm just curious...am I the only person on this list
>who thinks O.J. is innocent?
>
>
>===
>Christopher Herman
>Check out my improved Home Page-
>http://www.jpostmail.com/jpost/users/Christopher1
>_________________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
>
><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>><><><><><><><><>
<>
>A Growing Selection of A-albionic's Books Can Be Browsed and Purchased
>Conveniently in the Shopping Cart at http://a-albionic.com/shopping.html <<
> END

------------------------------

End of prj-digest V1 #189
*************************

<< END

--
Forwarded for info and discussion from the New Paradigms
Discussion List, not necessarily endorsed by:
***********************************
Lloyd Miller, Research Director for A-albionic Research (POB 20273,
Ferndale, MI 48220), a ruling class/conspiracy research resource for the
entire political-ideological spectrum. Quarterly journal, book sales,
rare/out-of-print searches, New Paradigms Discussion List, Weekly Up-date
Lists & E-text Archive of research, intelligence, catalogs, & resources.
To Discuss Ideas:
mailto:ll...@a-albionic.com http://msen.com/~lloyd/
For Ordering Info & Free Catalog:
mailto:ja...@a-albionic.com http://a-albionic.com/
For Discussion List:
mailto:majo...@mail.msen.com
text: subscribe prj <yo...@email.address>
**FREE RARE BOOK SEARCH: <mailto: frees...@a-albionic.com> **
Explore Our Archive: <http://a-albionic.com/a-albionic.html>
Please Patronize PRJ's Advertisers: http://home.msen.com/~daugh/store.htm
Many Pay Even If You Just Look and Don't Buy! Video Finder, Free catalogs,
Health Products, Sweepstakes, Etc.
***********************************
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a

a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a

a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
aa
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a

a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
aa
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a

a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a

0 new messages