A very good article that will be shunned by the conspiracy kooks
Thanks for posting it
See also Dr. Greening's other articles:
http://www.911myths.com/WTCREPORT.pdf
http://www.911myths.com/Energy_Transfer_Addendum.pdf
http://www.911myths.com/NISTREPORT.pdf
Unlike Prof. Jones and the so-called "Scholars for 9/11 Truth", Dr.
Greening's studies are fully transparent, revealing his assumptions, data,
and calculations.
I and others sent Prof. Jones these papers for comment. Eventually, Jones
et all will be forced to deal with the actual physics, chemsistry,
structural engineering, and forensic science they are so far avoiding.
The nerve of some people. ;)
nah it's interesting, but i find its central explanation of the
collapse weak. What is that with 10 tons of aluminium igniting and
exploding each floor at a time...that's kinda nuts.
"Sky King" <sky...@scientist.com> wrote in message
news:phmsu11q55qlok61j...@4ax.com...
Be sure to send the video to Snopes.
"Quintal" <xavi...@here.now> wrote in message
news:45ssu1lphg69rm8bq...@4ax.com...
Just put an ignition source under a pile of aluminium powder.
Cheaper
"george" <gbl...@hnpl.net> wrote in message
news:1139706500....@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>This will ignite your aluminum.
>http://ratemycameltoe.com/vote.php
Now that's the most sensible thing that's been posted here in months!
Phil
--
Statistics are like a bikini. What they reveal is
suggestive, but what they conceal is vital.
Aaron Levenstein
:-)
buy a cracker (fiework) and see which one goes off with a bang :-)
>
>New scientific research shows that there very well could have been
>Thermite-type explosions at WTC 1 and WTC 2:
>
>http://www.911myths.com/WTCTHERM.pdf
And Tower 7 ?