Re: Anti-semitism (anti-Judaism) in the sira, koran and hadith
drahcir
> "drahcir" <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrotenews:088eb260-84d9-46a2...@k17g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>
> > "_ G O D _" wrote:
> > > "drahcir" <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrote
> >>news:464e386b-dcba-4160...@w19g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> > There is no such thing as "semitism"....
>
> >> Only a COck-sucking imbecile
> >> like you would assert such crap....
>
> > Is that any way for GOD to speak? You're not
> > only a moron, you're a primitive, rude moron.
>
> I'm just being straight forward with you, COck-sucker.
> Because even kindergarteners know what the prefix
> "anti" stand for. Hence, the following word must exist...
Wow, sounds like good logic. So, since "biotic" means "pertaining to
life", I suppose you think an antibiotic is "against life". See what
happens when someone who should be flipping burgers tries to think?
You'd better cease that activity before you get yourself into trouble.
> The dogma of word Semitism is based upon a Bible
> fairy tale, where Sem was oldest (of 12) son of Noah....
> You see, I'm not a sectarian like you, but know things....
As I said, you are a moron. Anti-Semitism does NOT mean "against
semitism" any more than antibiotic means against biotic. An anti-
Semite is against ALL Jews, PERIOD, not against some fictional dogma
that some asshole on usenet claims SOME Jews subscribe to.
> _____________________________________________________
>
> I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
> and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
Just get back to your griddle, cretin.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> "The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
> Humvees, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or
> high security, or a high budget. The army that can defeat terrorism
> does battle quietly, clearing minefields and vaccinating children. It
> undermines military dictatorships and military lobbyists. It subverts
> sweatshops and special interests.Where people feel powerless, it
> helps them organize for change, and where people are powerful, it
> reminds them of their responsibility." ~~~~ Author Unknown ~~~~
> ___________________________________________________
> --
cornholio
> "drahcir" <justrichardsmu...@gmail.com> wrotenews:3f3d48b5-b755-48cf...@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
>
> > "_ G O D _" wrote:
>
> >> to an antibiotic, because they both fight sickness,
> >> but Judophobia is only a vehicle for that sickness....
>
> > Lots of pretentious blahblah to attempt to mask the fact that your
> > argument was stupid. Can't expect much more from your ilk.
>
> I don't really know to which particular "ilk" you are
> sorting me inside of your head, but the argument
> was yours, from the beginning. I just happened to
> support the fact that the meaning of the antibiotic,
> as you have inadvertently asserted, is indeed, - a
> destroyer, or inhibitor, of the life of bacteria which
> causing the disease. Therefore, if you are looking
> for someone to blame for "stupid argument," then
> blame yourself. There's nothing pretentious about
> the fact that the real culprit (every body should be
> fighting), is actually a Semitism, not the other way
> around....
> --
"A Semitism", is English your native language Abdul? Or is it
Arabic or Urdu?
_ G O D _
news:609f48d5-e290-4428...@d21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> "_ G O D _" wrote:
>> news:3f3d48b5-b755-48cf...@g26g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> > "_ G O D _" wrote:
>>
>> >> Therefore, you indeed, may equate antisemitism
>> >> to an antibiotic, because they both fight sickness,
>> >> but Judophobia is only a vehicle for that sickness....
>>
>> > Lots of pretentious blahblah to attempt to mask the fact that your
>> > argument was stupid. Can't expect much more from your ilk.
>>
>> I don't really know to which particular "ilk" you are
>> sorting me inside of your head, but the argument
>> was yours, from the beginning. I just happened to
>> support the fact that the meaning of the antibiotic,
>> as you have inadvertently asserted, is indeed, - a
>> destroyer, or inhibitor, of the life of bacteria which
>> causing the disease. Therefore, if you are looking
>> for someone to blame for "stupid argument," then
>> blame yourself. There's nothing pretentious about
>> the fact that the real culprit (every body should be
>> fighting), is actually a Semitism, not the other way
>> around....
>> --
>
Is this just another one of your "valid arguments," or you
are simply a COck-sucking sectarian retard who unable
to understand in the only language you communicate in,
and decided to show me your vial penis breath, instead?
Save it for your butt-buddies, who able to appreciate it...
--
_____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
and other beneficiaries of the institutionalized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Topaz
Jews say that being "anti-Semitic" is a terrible crime. Do they say
being "anti-Arab" is a terrible crime? What about "anti-Christian", or
"anti-German"? Of course the Jews think
they are special. Any other group could be our enemy, but not the
Jews, they say. The Jews tell us the Arabs are our enemies. The
Jewish controlled media tells us that the Jews are America's only
friend in the Middle East. The truth is that before these Jews America
didn't have any enemies in the Middle East.
No one is moaning because America once fought the British. But
suddenly Jews can not be the enemy under any circumstances. Why is
that? Because the Jews control the media. Think outside the box.
Now that America is ruled by the Jews it is no insult to be called
"anti-Semite". The insult is that they think we care about their self
serving verbiage.
The Jewish controlled media said the French were "cheese eating
surrender monkeys". Why can't the French howl "anti-French" like the
Jews howl "anti-Semite"? Because the French don't control the media,
Jews do.
This is what President Nixon said:
http://www.hnn.us/comments/15664.html
"There may be some truth in that if the Arabs have some complaints
about my policy towards Israel, they have to realize that the Jews in
the U.S. control the entire information and propaganda machine, the
large newspapers, the motion pictures, radio and television, and the
big companies. And there is a force that we have to take into
consideration."
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
Joe Bruno
> Jews say that being "anti-Semitic" is a terrible crime. Do they say
> being "anti-Arab" is a terrible crime? What about "anti-Christian", or
> "anti-German"? Of course the Jews think
I say that being stupid is a crime. You get 200 years in jail.
Topaz
In researching Jewish history, the investigator discovers a wide
variance of written material. Work by authors expressly critical of
Jews (and they include a surprising number of Jewish commentators,
mostly "apostates" of one kind or another) is invariably labeled by
today's political conventions to be "anti-Semitic" in nature. There is
a large body of such material extending throughout history, written by
critics wherever Jews were to be found. Observations about Jewish
life by non-Jews is startlingly consistent over two thousand years.
Consistently credible Gentile themes in attacks against Jews include
Jewish elitism, their insularity and clannishness, their disdain for
non-Jews, their exploitive and deceptive behavior towards those not
their own, the suspicion of Jewish national loyalties and allegiance
to the lands they lived in, excessive Jewish proclivity for money and
economic domination, and an economic "parasitism" (the concentration
of Jews in lucrative non-productive fields of finance-usury, money
lending, etc.-at the expense of non-Jewish communities).
"Hatred for the Jews," Abram Leon writes, "does not date solely from
the birth of Christianity. Seneca treated the Jews as a criminal race.
Juvenal believed that the Jews only existed to cause evil for other
peoples. Quintilian said that Jews were a curse for other people"
(Leon, 71).
In 59 BC the Roman statesman Cicero criticized Jewish "clannishness"
and "influence in the assemblies." In the second century AD Celsus,
one of Rome's great medical writers, wrote that Jews "pride themselves
in possessing superior wisdom and disdain for the company of other
men." Philostratus, an ancient Greek author, believed that Jews "have
long since risen against humanity itself. They are men who have
devised a misanthropic life, who share neither food nor drink with
others." (Cf. Shakespeare's Merchant of Venice, I, iii, 29-32.) The
great Roman historian Tacitus (A.D. 56-120) declared that "the Jews
are extremely loyal toward one another, and are always ready to show
compassion [for their fellow Jews], but toward other people they feel
only hate and enmity" (Morais, 46).
Centuries later Voltaire's criticism of Jews, in his Essai sur le
Moeurs, repeated many of the same charges: "The Jewish nation dares to
display an irreconcilable hatred toward all nations, and revolts
against all masters; always superstitious, always greedy for the
well-being enjoyed by others, always barbarous-cringing in misfortune
and insolent in prosperity."
"However uncomfortable it is to recognize," says Albert Lindemann,
"not all those whom historians have classified as anti-Semites were
narrow bigots, irrational, or otherwise incapable of acts of altruism
and moral courage. They represented a bewildering range of opinion and
personality types" (Lindemann, 13). And why is this "uncomfortable
[for Jews] to recognize?" Because, by even a child's exercise of logic
and common sense, the common denominator of all such disparate people
can only be the enduring truths about Jews as each observer
experienced them in varying historical and cultural circumstances.
The French Jewish intellectual (and eventual Zionist), Bernard Lazare,
among many others in history, noted this obvious fact in 1894, long
before the Nazi persecutions of Jews and resultant institutionalized
Jewish efforts to deny, or obfuscate, crucial-and central- aspects of
their history:
Wherever the Jews settled one observes the development of
anti-Semitism, or rather anti-Judaism ... If this hostility, this
repugnance had been shown towards the Jews at one time or in one
country only, it would be easy to account for the local cause of this
sentiment. But this race has been the object of hatred with all
nations amidst whom it settled.
Inasmuch as the enemies of Jews belonged to diverse races, as
they dwelled far apart from one another, were ruled by
different laws and governed by opposite principles; as they had
not the same customs and differed in spirit from one another,
so that they could not possibly judge alike of any subject, it
must needs be that the general causes of anti-Semitism have always
resided in [the people of] Israel itself, and not in those who
antagonized it (Lazare, 8).
Excerpts from from When Victims Rule, online at Jewish Tribal Review.
http://www.jewishtribalreview.org/wvr.htm
Joe Bruno
>
> http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
>
> http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
>
> http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
Until the early 20th century, the Russian Orthodox, Catholic, Baptist
and Lutheran churches included anti-Semitism as part of their
teachings. The European countries which expelled Jews, Spain,Russia,
France, Poland and England, were predominantly Catholic or Russian
Othodox.
cornholio
Yes and that ameliorates the fact that anti-semitism/anti-Judaism
is part and parcel of the muslime faith -- from bumhammad on down.
Bumhammad himself ordered and led in the slaughter/enslavement
of the Jews of Medina/Ytharib and Khybar. Which is why the muslime
fucks still rant and rave about the "Jews of Khybar" to this day and
Jews are expressly disallowed entry into Saudi Barbaria.
BTW, retard, the NT itself doesn't really contain much, if any anti-
semitism/anti-Judaism
at all, because all of Yeshua's 12 disciples were Jewish, as was he.
Genocidal
hatred and intolerance wasn't really part of Yeshua's message either.
He never advocated
violence against the Jewish people...EVER.
Topaz
wrote:
>
>Until the early 20th century, the Russian Orthodox, Catholic, Baptist
>and Lutheran churches included anti-Semitism as part of their
>teachings. The European countries which expelled Jews, Spain,Russia,
>France, Poland and England, were predominantly Catholic or Russian
>Othodox.
John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would
not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
John 20:19 "the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled
for fear of the Jews"
2 Co 11:24 "Of the Jews five times recieved I forty stripes save
one. Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned"
Mathew 27: 20+25 "But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the
multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus...then
answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our
children."
Acts 25:24 "ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the Jews
have dealt with me, both at Jerusalem and also here, crying that he
ought not to live any longer."
John 8:42,44,48 "Jesus said unto them...Ye are of your father the
devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from
the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth
in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a
liar, and the father of it...Then answered the Jews..."
Topaz
"Jews always position themselves as mediators. These
nasties hold it cardinal they accredit and interpret *everything*.
Nothing has worth or meaning until it's pronounced upon by a generous
scoop of shit in a hate hat. Nothing must be expressed save in jewish
terms. Invaders become undocumented workers. Queers become gays.
Freakins become African-Americans. Attack on Iraq becomes defense of
America. Nothing is legitimate save Big Kike stamp off on it.
BK doesn't like it when a Sheehan steps forward and foghorns facts to
fodder. Instantly, like mosquitoes at twilight, a flock of
bloodthirsty kikes appears, buzzing and sucking and whining. Have you
ever noticed that it is impossible to criticize jews and keep your
character? The jews have literally billions of enemies worldwide, yet
not a single one of them is an honest man of laudable motive. It is
impossible to carry off this charade without controlling the media
and a hell of a lot of other things too. The minute jew-criticism
appears, the ashkenazis and appeaser annies begin the smear. No one
ever opposed a loving kike except invidiously. Smear campaigns are
media control in action. There are other aspects of media control, but
day in day out, making horrible shrieks and gurgles to keep the goyish
herd away from the healthy green fields is the workaday business of
the controllers. Jews determine which issues may be debated, and in
what terms. Jews make up more than fifty percent of the experts on
both sides of these tiny debates. A few vetted goyim are allowed
through to keep up the charade of democratic discussion. The Internet
is the only medium that prevents the illusion of popular conformity
with jewthink being carried off. All that is necessary for jews to
maintain control is to create a congenial if bogus reality through
television and the main dailies, and relentlessly enforce this
orthodoxy through smear campaigns against any who breach it.
The death of a son is one of the few motives strong enough to drive
average goy fodder to breach etiquette and speak truth to kikes. She
must be shut down. How to do that? You can see the jews' uncertainty.
They attack her, at the same time, as both a lefty and a nazi.
Illogical, but in time they'll settle on an approach. Sometimes just
throwing shit and see what sticks is the best way. How dare Sheehan
value her own son more than the interests of Israel?
I say my son died for LIES. George Bush LIED to us and he knew he
was LYING.
And none of the thick rancid honkings Limbaugh and the freeper
patriotards can gainsay it. Remember that bushy came out of manly
Barbara, the wizened maw who asked why she should trouble her
"beautiful mind" about the body bags coming back from Iraq. You know -
the ones you never see, because they have to show you endless pictures
of $440,000-compensated jews being "ethnically cleansed," sniff, yet
again. Only an anti-Semite puts his own life before Israel. The jews
are the one people on earth who routinely are absolved of guilt for
that for which they and they alone are guilty. Isn't that odd?
DaX
http://www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
AgitProp
And isn't it strange that despite the alleged expulsions and imagined
"pogroms" - the jews fanatically kept staying & returning in the
oppressive
foreign lands?
Something doesn't add-up here, don't you think?
cornholio
> On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 09:28:40 -0800 (PST), Joe Bruno <joebr...@usa.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >Until the early 20th century, the Russian Orthodox, Catholic, Baptist
> >and Lutheran churches included anti-Semitism as part of their
> >teachings. The European countries which expelled Jews, Spain,Russia,
> >France, Poland and England, were predominantly Catholic or Russian
> >Othodox.
>
> John 7:1 "After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would
> not walk in Judea, because the Jews sought to kill him."
>
> John 20:19 "the doors were shut where the disciples were assembled
> for fear of the Jews"
>
> 2 Co 11:24 "Of the Jews five times recieved I forty stripes save
> one. Thrice was I beaten with rods, once was I stoned"
>
> Mathew 27: 20+25 "But the chief priests and the elders persuaded the
> multitude that they should ask Barabbas, and destroy Jesus...then
> answered all the people, and said, His blood be on us, and on our
> children."
>
> Acts 25:24 "ye see this man, about whom all the multitude of the Jews
> have dealt with me, both at Jerusalem and also here, crying that he
> ought not to live any longer."
>
> John 8:42,44,48 "Jesus said unto them...Ye are of your father the
> devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from
> the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth
> in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a
> liar, and the father of it...Then answered the Jews..."
>
According to the wikipedia article on Jesus, all of Jesus' apostles/
disciples
were Jewish and never renounced their faith in Judaism. Yeshua never
urged anyone to abandon Judaism or indeed, to harm anyone Jewish.
Topaz
<andx...@gmail.com> wrote:
>According to the wikipedia article on Jesus, all of Jesus' apostles/
>disciples
>were Jewish and never renounced their faith in Judaism. Yeshua never
>urged anyone to abandon Judaism or indeed, to harm anyone Jewish.
"He must be regarded as a popular leader who took up His position
against Jewry... The Jews, by the way, regarded Him as the son of a
whore and a Roman soldier ... For the Galilean's object was to
liberate His country from Jewish oppression. He set Himself against
Jewish capitalism, and that's why the Jews liquidated Him. ,... Jesus
was most certainly not a Jew. The Jews would never have handed one of
their own people to the Roman courts; they would have condemned Him
themselves. ...Jesus fought against the materialism of His age, and,
therefore, against the Jews.... a declaration of war on the golden
calf, on the egotism and the materialism of the Jews"
Adolf Hitler
_ G O D _
news:hfv1no$dgp$1...@news.eternal-september.org...
>
> "Dermot Goldstein" <dgold...@charter.net> wrote
> news:4b226dae...@news.x-privat.org...
>> drahcir <sg...@sgscc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> dgold...@charter.net (Dermot
>>>Goldstein) wrote:>>>>>> Where exactly do you see an opposition to a false
>>>>>> dogma of Semitism in the opposition to Judaism?
>>>>>
>>>>>There is no such thing as "semitism"
>>>>
>>>>And please excuse the change of name (again).
>>>
>>>There is no such thing as "semitism" - sometimes dictionaries get it wrong.
>>
>> I tend to disagree...
>> Semitism is the kind of jewish behaviour
>> that gives rise to 'anti-semitism'.
>
> Yes! Yes!
In defense of the anti-semitists, I'd have to (again !!!!)
explain the deliberate misinterpretation of the term of
"semitism," which COck-sucking sectarian imbeciles
are using to support their false dogma of creationism,
in opposition to the Darwin's theory of evolution which
is more solid and reasonable than a Bible's fairy tales....
The tale about Sem was written in Hebrew long before
someone has wrongly decided to stereotype and label
this language in the capacity of Semitic. Because this
tale is as old as an Old Testament itself. The fairy tale
of Noah and his 12 sons, who populated the world - is
the bone of the Semitism - upon which the earlier laws
were built. Some of those laws have survived until our
days - thanks to blatant support of superstitious nature,
and perpetuated by the followers of their religious cults.
Those laws are conflicting with modern laws designed
to improve the life of contemporary generation - where
dignity and equality - are overweighing the importance
of the primitive political structure. Hence, the sectarian
antagonism, which is based on their resentment of the
fact that their false dogma of superstitious nature can't
be a pivotal doctrine for a contemporary law of society...
--
---
_____________________________________________________
I intend to last long enough to put out of business all COck-suckers
along with all institutions of the industrialized slavery and genocide.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"The army that will defeat terrorism doesn't wear uniforms, or drive
Humvies, or calls in air-strikes. It doesn't have a high command, or