So many Atheists it seems now are
vacating and coming to Him. Has
Dawkins 'set the pattern'? In a recent
and fatal NYTimes interview Dawkins
broke down after 2 hours and admitted
his personal belief in God.
It's highly plausible that in the universe there
are God-like creatures. - Richard Dawkins
Dawkins - a staunch atheist despite the desperate LIES of creationists
to the contrary, will not only take on, but take down Britain's
leading man of a god.
>Dawkins - a staunch atheist despite the desperate LIES of creationists
>to the contrary, will not only take on, but take down Britain's
>leading man of a god.
>Budikka
I cannot imagine an Archbishop of Canterbury actually believing any of
the lies of creationists.
> Dawkins - a staunch atheist despite the desperate LIES of creationists
> to the contrary, will not only take on, but take down Britain's
> leading man of a god.
Lovely.
Is the godbotherer going to apologise for taking the name of Brian in vain ?
In article <623880a7-652f-41f4-b1cb-f6c73c7fc...@hs8g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>,
Loirbaj <Rhodi...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
> Dawkins 'set the pattern'? In a recent
> and fatal NYTimes interview Dawkins
> opened up after 2 hours and dispayed
> his personal disbelief in God.
After two hours of conversation, Professor Dawkins walks far afield. He talks of the possibility that we might co-evolve with computers, a silicon destiny. And heıs intrigued by the playful, even soul-stirring writings of Freeman Dyson, the theoretical physicist.
In one essay, Professor Dyson casts millions of speculative years into the future. Our galaxy is dying and humans have evolved into something like bolts of superpowerful intelligent and moral energy.
[So the context of discussion is now established as being in Dyson's far future, and the following must be interpreted in that context]
Doesnıt that description sound an awful lot like God?
[Again establishing that the context is Dyson's future universe]
³Certainly,² Professor Dawkins replies. ³Itıs highly plausible that in the [Dyson future] universe there are God-like creatures.²
He raises his hand, just in case a reader thinks heıs gone around a religious bend. ³Itıs very important to understand that these [future] Gods came into being by an explicable scientific progression of incremental evolution.²
Could they be immortal?
The professor shrugs. ³Probably not.² He smiles and adds, ³But I wouldnıt want to be too dogmatic about that.²
A version of this article appeared in print on September 20, 2011, in
>> Dawkins - a staunch atheist despite the desperate LIES of
>> creationists to the contrary, will not only take on, but take down
>> Britain's leading man of a god.
> Lovely.
> Is the godbotherer going to apologise for taking the name of Brian in
> vain ?
Not likely.
Being a fundimentalist means never having to apologise.
Ever.
