> > On 3 Oct, 11:33, "robcap...@netscape.com" <robcap...@netscape.com>
> > wrote:

> > > On Oct 3, 12:23 pm, Walt <papakochenb...@evertek.net> wrote:

> > > > On 3 Oct, 10:08, "robcap...@netscape.com" <robcap...@netscape.com>
> > > > wrote:

> > > > > On Oct 2, 9:23 pm, curtjester1 <curtjest...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> > > > > > On Oct 1, 11:05 pm, "Sam McClung" <mccl...@newsguy.com> wrote:

> > > > > > > Dallas County Deputy Seymour Weitzman, who identified the 7.65 Mauser found
> > > > > > > in the TSBD also identified Bernard "Macho" Barker as someone he saw behind
> > > > > > > the north knoll fence after the shooting.

> > > > > > > In what is traditionally known as the Badgeman area in the Moorman photo
> > > > > > > which sold at auction for $175,000 earlier this year, it appears a human
> > > > > > > head may be visible with the head and chin just clearing the triangluar
> > > > > > > picket fence tops about 5 feet tall, the "badge" being not a badge but
> > > > > > > something else in front of the fence, sunlight or something else being
> > > > > > > confused in the past for the discharge of a firearm in front of the person's
> > > > > > > head, with an even bigger light spot or something else area to the right of
> > > > > > > the "flash."

> > > > > > > There appears to possibly be a large X centered over the left eye area and a
> > > > > > > fainter large X over the right eye area of the person.

> > > > > > > Only about the top right quarter of the front of the head seems to be lit by
> > > > > > > direct sunlight.

> > > > > > >http://www.thevoiceofreason.com/Conspiracy/images/badgeman.jpg

> > > > > > Beverly Oliver saw Roscoe White in partial uniform when she went up
> > > > > > the steps.  She saw him prior when Roscoe's wife worked at Ruby's and
> > > > > > he picked her up.  And also Jack, Roscoe's son, saw a film cannister
> > > > > > in his possessions with Army man's labeled on the cannister.   And a
> > > > > > guy who said he corresponded with Lee Bowers who lived in Canada said
> > > > > > Bowers saw two policemen back of the fence and were shooters.  Al
> > > > > > Navis said he misplaced the letter, though.

> > > > > > CJ

> > > >  Robert Morningstar has done some interesting work in this area with
> > > >  the photos, and he s quite convinced that the "badgeman" could be
> > > >  either JDT or White (I think he says it is JDT).  It gets confusing
> > > > to
> > > >  people as we are all speculating to varying degrees

> > > > HOT DAMN!!!..... The stupid bastard said: "we are all speculating to
> > > > varying degrees "....

> > > > Do you want to tell that to your old homosexual pervert buddy........
> > > > You and he refer to my speculations as "lies"

> > > Show me where I claim as FACT that Tippit, White, Harrelson, Souetre,
> > > Mertz, Frenchy, Hunt, et.al. were the GN snipers (or any other
> > > location sniper).  I do NOT claim things to be FACTS like you do when
> > > I can't prove them.

> > Whoa there ya lying scumbag......Did you or did you not write:..."we
> > are all speculating to varying degrees "....

> See how scary this is??? Walt can't even follow a train of though, or
> he is really desperate, as he doesn't see the difference.

> Here is the difference for the logic impaired, i.e. Walt:

> 1) Speculating for speculating sake.  Most CTers do this from time to
> time, I do it sometimes to try and make pieces fit together.

> 2) Speculating, but claiming it to be FACT, AND attack anyone who
> doesn't agree that your "speculating" is FACT. This is what Walt does
> on a constant basis.

> > THAT'S the crux of my post..... The FACT that you admitted that "we
> > are all speculating to varying degrees "....
> > and yet you and yer homosexual buddy call my speculations "lies"

> Show me how 1 and 2 are the same.

> > Do try to pull yer usual duck and run crap.....be a man for once andadmit that you wrote..."we are all speculating to

> >  varying degrees "....

> When do I duck & run?  In fact, I would say I'm a glutton for
> punishment as I see these through much longer than is really sane to
> do.  I try and talk reason with a guy who calls me "Stupid B-----d"
> all the time.  I must be nuts!
The stupid bastard wrote:...." I must be nuts!"

> Don't get your undies in a knot, I did NOT say anything to get you off
> the big hook you placed yourself on.  Show me how 1 and 2 are the same.- Hide quoted text -

> - Show quoted text -