Shall We Welcome Gil Jesus ( aka : robcap ) To AAJ ....!
cdddraftsman
On Oct 10, 8:27 pm, robcap...@netscape.com wrote:
> back into the U.S. after defecting to the U.S.S.R. so easily? And
> why did we pay for his return trip? Is this customary for someone
> who defected and had top secret info he could have passed on to
> the Soviets (i.e. U2 details)? This seems strange to me , but I'd
> like to hear some of the official theory buffs answer this .
It appears Gil Jesus aka : robcap...@netscape.com whose Video's
on YouTube include :
' Was JFK Trying To Cough Up A Bullet ' and
' Did JBC Shoot JFK From The Floorboards Of The Limo '
is no more honest about the JFK Assassination then he is
about not visiting AAJ because
"John McAdam's can see into your computer "
and
" Gives you viruses " ala Tom Rossley fame .
Ya right ? Well ............
Perhaps if anyone would like to question Gil Jesus about his
remarkable string of Video's on YouTube , some 178 in all
( 30 alone culled from splices made from the series TMWKK )
Now would be the time to ask him .
_________________________________________________
Grom ACJ :
Unedited version :
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/browse_thread/thread/cf96979624b24545
Edited version :
justm...@gmail.com wrote :
GIL JESUS WITH ANOTHER DECEIVING NAME ROBCAP :
Well here we go again, when Gil is driven into the background and no
one listens to his him , he appears with another name and tries to
start threads where he can sound intelligent again. It's amazing what
he will do isn't it? LOL...
I told ya Gil, you're monitored and no matter how many different
emails you sign up for google with...or how many different names you
try and use...you're gonna get nailed. Keep it up though, each time
you do it you lose even more credibilty and prove to this newsgroup
that you mislead people on purpose about the JFK Assassination .
Links are below, take note of the exact IP Address once again. This
is really getting to be a joke...how many more names can Gil come up
with???
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/606f3c79b6033bf...
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.12.116.136
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/ae5561ab30b6905...
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.12.116.136
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gil Jesus wrote :
Justme . That's the ISP address, not the IP address.
That ISP belongs to AOL. I just checked it on my tracer.
Wasn't she the IT expert who said that AOL used "floating ISP
addresses" that change ?
If you look at my earlier posts, my ISP address is 172.166.43.125
So what's the point ?
I'm not rob whatever..he uses netscape. I use AOL.
This justme is wrong .
_______________________________________________________
Sorry Gil....aol will use different ip addresses but will never assign
the same one to two different people. Don't try and ___ your way out
of this one too Gil....It isn't going to work. You also have an ip
thats 205-188.116.136 so what's your point? That ip was the same one
tha your hotrod name used.
Shows how you are Gil....you use AOL ! Netscape is only a browser,
anyone can sign up for a netscape email address...same as they can for
any other email out there. I just got done telling you that AOL
changes the ip address when you dial in...but they will never assign
the SAME addy to 2 different people. No one else but Gil Jesus will
be assigned the ip addresses of 64.12.116.136, 205.188.116.136 or
172.166.43.125. They all belong to you Gil , you just never know which
one you'll get when you log onto your ISP.
_______________________________________________
If any of you are in doubt that Gil is trying to once again
deceive...here's some more solid proof of another poster on the net
who did the same thing and was nailed. Healy? You're comments about
me not being an IT person should taste pretty good right now .
http://antisocialmedia.net/?p=51
Usenet posts carry with them header data that's hidden by default,
but which includes important information identifying the origin of a
post.
Look at this post by Yitz with its header data included (limited to
the most relevant data below):
From: "Yitz"
Date: 18 Nov 2005 17:51:21 -0800
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.23.102.179 Compare that with this post by Ted
(truncated below):From: "Ted"
Date: 27 Nov 2005 09:25:49 -0800
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.23.102.179
Note that between the two posts, one element is identical: Posting-
Host. This means both of these posts, while nine days apart, were made
from the same computer.
In fact, identical Posting-Host data are also shared by
daveumansky,teddydichtler, tdicktler, Ted, annieschwartz and Brenda,
suggesting they're all the same person.
The IP address used in the above example (70.23.102.179) is owned by
Verizon and assigned to dsl customers in the pool designated as
NY325.Most subscribers in that pool see their IP address (and thus
Posting-Host) address change randomly, on roughly a monthly basis.
Some time in the first half of December, 2005, the Posting-Host of
garywbw, daveumansky, teddydichtler, tdicktler, Ted, annieschwartz and
Brenda all changed to 70.23.42.100 in unison: consistent with a single
user scenario posited here.
The point of this exercise is conclusively demonstrate that Gary
Weiss= garywbw = daveumansky = pascalamb = Yitz = Ted Dichtler
And here's why that's really important...
In April of 2005, a blog called Mediacrity appeared, calling itself a
"media insider's occasional rant on goofs, bias and hypocrisy in the
media."
Mediacrity's inaugural post is dated April 24, 2005. The first
reference to Mediacrity on Usenet occurs the next day, thanks to
TedDichtler, who read that first post and comments "this guy nailed it
on the head."
Within two hours of Mediacrity's second post, Dichtler is back on
Usenet spreading the word.
This time two interesting things happen.
First, a real person, Susan Cohen, asks Ted to clarify the identity
of Alison Weir, the post's subject. Soon thereafter, Mediacrity
appendsthe post with:
A reader informs me that the Jew-baiting pinhead who met with Okrentis
not to be confused with a distinguished historian also named Alison
Weir.
Second, a couple of days later a new poster arrives on the thread
started by Dichtler. His name is Rick Ruby, and his email address
is:mediacr...@hotmail.com (the original email used by the writer of
Mediacrity, recently replaced by a gmail account).
To be certain, let's compare the header data of Ted Dichtler and Rick
Ruby's respective posts.
Ted Dichtler (full version here):
From: "Ted"
Date: 26 Apr 2005 12:10:24 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.12.116.66
Rick Ruby (full version here)
From: "Rick Ruby"
Date: 29 Apr 2005 07:03:57 -0700
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.12.116.66
The IP data (corresponding to AOL at that point) are identical,
confirming Ted Dichtler and Rick Ruby posted from the same location,
and are most likely the same person.
At this point, it seems we can confidently add two elements to the
growing list of identities that begins with Gary Weiss:
Gary Weiss = garywbw = daveumansky = pascalamb = Yitz = Ted
Dichtler=Rick Ruby = Mediacrity blogger.
If each of those relationships is accurate, this chain of equalities
may also be correctly expressed as Gary Weiss = Mediacrity blogger.
Knowing Gary is the blogger behind Mediacrity opens up a whole
universe of conflicts and complications to examine, as we shall do
inPart Three of this series, set for publication on Saturday,
December23, 2006.
Read the entire article on the link attached !
_____________________________________________________
Seems the woman has her IS and ISP's together !
Excuse me while I go and look up what all that means
:-( Sad face by me )-:
........tl.......
robc...@netscape.com
> In Case McAdam's DON'T Post This One :
>
> On Oct 10, 8:27 pm, robcap...@netscape.com wrote:
>
> > back into the U.S. after defecting to the U.S.S.R. so easily? And
> > why did we pay for his return trip? Is this customary for someone
> > who defected and had top secret info he could have passed on to
> > the Soviets (i.e. U2 details)? This seems strange to me , but I'd
> > like to hear some of the official theory buffs answer this .
>
> It appears Gil Jesus aka : robcap...@netscape.com whose Video's
> on YouTube include :
>
> ' Was JFK Trying To Cough Up A Bullet ' and
>
> ' Did JBC Shoot JFK From The Floorboards Of The Limo '
>
> is no more honest about the JFK Assassination then he is
> about not visiting AAJ because
>
> "John McAdam's can see into your computer "
>
people. Both smart and on the right side. Keep up the good work
Gil. I'm fairly new to the board but I can tell already see
cdddraftsman needs help in seeing the light.
Gil Jesus
>
> - Show quoted text -
Thanks Rob and as any idiot, save "Justme Ironbox" can see, we're NOT
on the same ISP:
let the lurkers compare our two posts made at exactly 8:36pm:
mine
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/4ab7b268d4897360?dmode=source
and yours
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/19419a86fba40666?dmode=source
The issue is hereby dead...just like the trolls' brains.
Please excuse Lowry's (cdddraftsman) exuberance when he thinks he's
FOUND something...he couldn't find his ass with both hands.
Sam Brown
<robc...@netscape.com> wrote in message
news:1192149414.8...@t8g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
So you consider being a bigot and slightly deranged as being "smart and on
the right side"? Welcome aboard Rob, it's nice to have you here. hmmmmmm.
>
cdddraftsman
>
> and yours
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/19419a86fba4066...
>
> The issue is hereby dead...just like the trolls' brains.
>
> Please excuse Lowry's (cdddraftsman) exuberance when he thinks he's
Funny Gildoa , yours is posted at : On Oct 11, 8:36 pm
and robcap is posted at : On Oct 11, 6:04 pm
Funny TOO that you'd both post at exactely the same time as you
claim ? Hahahahahahaah ! Your lack of cwitical tinkering skills
doesn't apply to me Gil , forget it , everyone knows your the same
person ! Lights out !
robc...@netscape.com
> > people. Both smart and on the right side. Keep up the good work
> > Gil. I'm fairly new to the board but I can tell already see
> > cdddraftsman needs help in seeing the light.
>
> So you consider being a bigot and slightly deranged as being "smart and on
> the right side"? Welcome aboard Rob, it's nice to have you here. hmmmmmm.
I hope you are kidding, which I will assume you are, because calling
someone a bigot is a pretty serious charge. I don't think I have
written anything that could be construed as racial, so maybe you are
the bigot if you are not kidding.
Thanks for the reception.
Robert
justm...@gmail.com
How many puters do you own Chico?? Nah rob Gil is the Bigot...then
again you and he are one in the same so I guess that would make you a
bigot too huh? Keep trying Gilly, you're a loser no matter what the
outcome is. When are you going to just play dead? I told you it suits
you. BIGOT!
tomnln
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
For, they practise Nazi Justice.
<justm...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1192231152.2...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
YoHarvey
> The LOSERS are those who Refuse to address evidence/testimony.
>
>
> For, they practise Nazi Justice.
>
>
> news:1192231152.2...@q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > On Oct 12, 5:55 pm, robcap...@netscape.com wrote:
> >> > > I'm robcap and I know I'm not Gil Jesus. We are two different
> >> > > people. Both smart and on the right side. Keep up the good work
> >> > > Gil. I'm fairly new to the board but I can tell already see
> >> > > cdddraftsman needs help in seeing the light.
>
> >> > So you consider being a bigot and slightly deranged as being "smart and
> >> > on
> >> > the right side"? Welcome aboard Rob, it's nice to have you here.
> >> > hmmmmmm.
>
> >> I hope you are kidding, which I will assume you are, because calling
> >> someone a bigot is a pretty serious charge. I don't think I have
> >> written anything that could be construed as racial, so maybe you are
> >> the bigot if you are not kidding.
>
> >> Thanks for the reception.
>
> >> Robert
>
> > How many puters do you own Chico?? Nah rob Gil is the Bigot...then
> > again you and he are one in the same so I guess that would make you a
> > bigot too huh? Keep trying Gilly, you're a loser no matter what the
> > outcome is. When are you going to just play dead? I told you it suits
>
> - Show quoted text -
If the lives of Jesus's children were on the line and Jesus had to
tell the truh about ANYTHING, his children would be dead. He's
incapable of the truth. That's what makes him the sad pathological
misfit he's proven himself to be. Nothing else need be said.
tomnln
Tricks to get me a bottle when I'm with her.
(she's gonna make copies of that video with me & her and sell then to get
RICH)
Wanna address evidence/testimony NOW?>>>
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/mexcity.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/Walker.htm
http://www.whokilledjfk.net/tippit.htm
"YoHarvey" <bail...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1192236031.0...@y27g2000pre.googlegroups.com...